Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
|
|
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on one side and Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 4864 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,7 GHz, its lithography is 8 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 4352 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,5 GHz, its lithography is 12 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in various benchmarks.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Graphics card | Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
| Release date | Q4 2020 | Q3 2018 | ||||||
| Model number | GA104-200-A1 | TU102-300-K1-A1, TU102-300A-K1-A1 |
||||||
| GPU name | GA104 | TU102 | ||||||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing | ||||||
| Generation | GeForce 30 | GeForce 20 | ||||||
| Lithography | 8 nm | 12 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | 17. 400.000.000 |
18.600.000.000 | ||||||
| Bus interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 1.410 MHz | 1.350 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 1.665 MHz | 1.545 MHz | ||||||
| Memory frequency | 1.750 MHz | 1.750 MHz | ||||||
| Effective memory speed | 14 Gbps | 14 Gbps | ||||||
| Memory size | 8 GB | 11 GB | ||||||
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 | ||||||
| Memory bus | 256 Bit | 352 Bit | ||||||
| Memory bandwidth | 448,0 GB/s | 616,0 GB/s | ||||||
| TDP | 200 W | 250 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 650W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| Multicard technology | — | 2-way NVLink | ||||||
| Outputs |
1x HDMI |
1x HDMI |
||||||
| Max display resolution |
— |
4096 x 2160@60Hz (HDMI), |
||||||
| Maximum GPU Temperature | 93°C | 89°C | ||||||
| Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) | 38 | 68 | ||||||
| Shading units (cuda cores) | 4. 864 |
4.352 | ||||||
| TMUs | 152 | 272 | ||||||
| ROPs | 80 | 88 | ||||||
| Tensor cores | 152 | 544 | ||||||
| RT cores | 38 | 68 | ||||||
| Cache memory | 4 MB | 5,5 MB | ||||||
| Pixel fillrate | 133,2 GP/s | 136,0 GP/s | ||||||
| Texture fillrate | 253,1 GT/s | 420,2 GT/s | ||||||
| Performance FP16 (half) | 16,2 TFLOPS | 26,9 TFLOPS | ||||||
| Performance FP32 (float) | 16,2 TFLOPS | 13,5 TFLOPS | ||||||
| Performance FP64 (double) | 253,1 GFLOPS | 420,2 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Tensor FLOPS | 129,6T | 107,6T | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| FP32 Performance in GFLOPS | |
|---|---|
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
16.200 |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
13.450 |
The difference is 20%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.
Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.
Equivalence:
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD equivalentNvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti AMD equivalent
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase.
These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer’s website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.
5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Buy on Amazon
vs
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1410 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark — G2D Mark: 999 vs 941
- Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.
5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 275.862 vs 172.949 - Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 23659
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 23659
| Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 vs 20 September 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1410 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 999 vs 941 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) |
275.862 vs 172.949 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 vs 23659 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 vs 23659 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3358 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark — G3D Mark: 21901 vs 20569
- Around 16% better performance in Geekbench — OpenCL: 138925 vs 120183
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.
5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 394.088 vs 314.126 - Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5451.484 vs 3615.048
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.104 vs 35.311
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1975.628 vs 1297.279
- Around 26% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score: 14624 vs 11583
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 21901 vs 20569 |
| Geekbench — OpenCL | 138925 vs 120183 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 394. 088 vs 314.126 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.484 vs 3615.048 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.104 vs 35.311 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1975.628 vs 1297.279 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3717 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 14624 vs 11583 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
| PassMark — G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark — G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench — OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score |
|
|
311
628| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 20569 | 21901 |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 999 | 941 |
| Geekbench — OpenCL | 120183 | 138925 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
314.126 | 394.088 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3615.048 | 5451.484 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 41.104 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 275.862 | 172.949 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1297.279 | 1975.628 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
3717 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 23659 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 11583 | 14624 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Code name | GA104 | TU102 |
| Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 | 20 September 2018 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $999 |
| Place in performance rating | 51 | 47 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price now | $1,279. 99 |
|
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.22 | |
| Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 1545 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1410 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16. 20 TFLOPS |
|
| Pipelines | 4864 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 253.1 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 17400 million | 18,600 million |
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4. 0 x16 |
PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.
|