Rx 460 2gb specs: AMD Radeon RX 460 Specs

Radeon RX 460 [in 6 benchmarks]

Summary

AMD started Radeon RX 460 sales 8 August 2016 at a recommended price of $86. This is a desktop graphics card based on a Polaris architecture and made with 14 nm manufacturing process. It is primarily aimed at gamer market. 4 GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 7 GHz are supplied, and together with 128 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s.

Compatibility-wise, this is dual-slot card attached via PCIe 3.0 x8 interface. Its manufacturer default version has a length of 170 mm. No additional power connector is required, and power consumption is at 75 Watt.

It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at

10.53%

of a leader’s which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

GeForce RTX4090

Compare

General info

Some basic facts about Radeon RX 460: architecture, market segment, release date etc.

Place in performance ranking	352
Value for money	3.09
Architecture	Polaris (2016−2019)
GPU code name	Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Market segment	Desktop
Release date	8 August 2016 (6 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)	$86
Current price	$316 (3.7x MSRP)	of 168889 (A100 PCIe 80 GB)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Technical specs

Radeon RX 460’s specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Radeon RX 460’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	896	of 20480 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT)
Core clock speed	1090 MHz	of 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT)
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	of 3599 (Radeon RX 7990 XTX)
Number of transistors	3,000 million	of 14400 (GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile)
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	of 4 (GeForce RTX 4080)
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	of 2400 (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem)
Texture fill rate	67.20	of 969.9 (h200 SXM5 96 GB)
Floating-point performance	2,150 gflops	of 16384 (Radeon Pro Duo)

Size and compatibility

This section provides details about the physical dimensions of Radeon RX 460 and its compatibility with other computer components. This information is useful when selecting a computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards, it includes details about the interface and bus (for motherboard compatibility) and additional power connectors (for power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	170 mm
Width	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None

Memory

Parameters of memory installed on Radeon RX 460: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.

Memory type	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	of 128 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory bus width	128 Bit	of 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz	of 22400 (GeForce RTX 4080)
Memory bandwidth	112. 0 GB/s	of 3276 (Aldebaran)
Shared memory	—

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on Radeon RX 460. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI	+

Technologies

Technological solutions and APIs supported by Radeon RX 460. You’ll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API support

APIs supported by Radeon RX 460, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	6.4
OpenGL	4.6
OpenCL	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131

Benchmark performance

Synthetic benchmark performance of Radeon RX 460. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 460
10.53

Passmark

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 460
4115

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280×720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 16%

RX 460
8597

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark coverage: 13%

RX 460
5166

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920×1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

RX 460
5701

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280×720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

RX 460
34892

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280×720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

RX 460
307888

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Radeon RX 460. Usually measured in megahashes per second.

Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)

240 Mh/s

Gaming performance

Let’s see how good Radeon RX 460 is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:

Full HD	41
1440p	55
4K	20

Performance in popular games

Relative perfomance

Radeon RX 460’s performance compared to nearest competitors among desktop video cards.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
106.17

AMD Radeon R9 270
104.65

NVIDIA P104-100
104.27

AMD Radeon RX 460
100

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
98.2

AMD Radeon R7 265
97.15

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
97.06

NVIDIA equivalent

According to our data, the closest NVIDIA alternative to Radeon RX 460 is GeForce GTX 480, which is slower by 2% and lower by 3 positions in our ranking.

GeForce GTX480

Compare

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon RX 460:

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
110.26

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
106. 17

NVIDIA P104-100
104.27

AMD Radeon RX 460
100

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
98.2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
97.06

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
96.3

Similar GPUs

Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

GeForce GTX750 Ti

Compare

Radeon R7370

Compare

Radeon R9270X

Compare

GeForce GTX1050

Compare

GeForce GTX950

Compare

GeForce GT1030

Compare

Recommended processors

These processors are most commonly used with Radeon RX 460 according to our statistics.

FX
6300

4.4%

Core i5
3470

2.3%

Core i3
6100

FX
4300

1.9%

Core i5
2400

1.8%

Core i3
7100

1.6%

Core i5
4460

1.5%

FX
8350

1.5%

Core i3
10100F

1.4%

Ryzen 3
1200

1.4%

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Radeon RX 460, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

AMD Radeon RX 460 review

AMD has scored two solid hits with its initial brace of Polaris 10-based graphics cards, with both RX 470 and RX 480 offering good performance at well-judged price points. These two products essentially allow for console-beating visual quality at 1080p60. The new RX 460 is different — based on the smaller Polaris 11 processor, the idea here is to bring console-level visual power to the entry-level enthusiast market — and indeed gaming notebooks — where the new chip’s power efficiency comes to the fore.

However, in assessing the RX 460, we’re looking at two high-end iterations of the card — Asus’s Strix model, and Sapphire’s Nitro edition. Both are exceptionally quiet, and crucially, both of them are equipped with 4GB of GDDR5, meaning that users shouldn’t need to skimp on texture quality — and should still be capable of matching PS4’s visual quality settings at similar frame-rates. The thing is, both of them cost £30/$30 more than the base £109/$109 price-point, so they really need to be special.

It’s still the same Polaris 11 processor inside, of course. This offers 14 fourth generation GCN compute units (there are 16 on the chip, two are disabled) while the reference boost clock is set to 1200MHz. There’s a factory overclock in effect on both of these models though, taking them up to 1250MHz. The base RX 460 is powered entirely through the motherboard’s PCI Express slot; however, this brace of overclocked editions feature an additional six-pin power input, opening up extra OC potential. It may also explain how both of these cards have a rock solid lock on their boost frequencies no matter what load you subject them to — something we didn’t see on the reference RX 480.

Physically, both of these cards are very imposing compared to the reference board we’ve seen from AMD, with twin-fan cooling assemblies — which may well be overkill for what is supposed to be a low-power processor. Video outputs are basic but to the point — dual-link DVI, DisplayPort and HDMI 2.0. The base level RX 460 at $109/£109 is the cheapest HDMI 2.0 card on the market — something worth bearing in mind for those interested in putting together an entry-level media PC.

A video review of the RX 460, offering a detailed overview and performance test of AMD’s debut Polaris 11 product.

Buy the AMD Radeon RX 460 from Amazon with free shipping.

Bearing in mind that we have 4GB overclocked versions of the RX 460, we slotted the card directly into our standard testing set-up, allowing us to more easily leverage our existing GPU data. In truth, the RX 460 is not set up for the ultra-level visuals tested here — it’s better suited to console-equivalent settings for consistently playable frame-rates, but we feel fairly confident in saying that the RX 460 should deliver frame-rates north of 30fps on high settings at 1080p in most titles.

Benchmarks should never be considered as a guide to the kind of experience you’ll get in the titles covered here. Instead we should consider them as identical game engine workloads tested on each piece of hardware, the idea being to establish the differentials between them.

We’ve split the tests into two here. In the first set of benchmarks, we stack up the RX 460 with its nearest Nvidia equivalent — the GTX 950 — along with its Polaris 10 neighbour, the RX 470. In between we have GTX 960 and its R9 380 rival. These may seem like unfair tests bearing in mind the RX 460’s £109/$109 price-point — but perhaps not bearing in mind the two cards we were supplied with have a £30/$30 price-premium. In the second test, we stack up Polaris 11 against a host of older AMD cards. Our testing here is limited to DirectX 11 as AMD still hasn’t properly fixed v-sync support for older Radeons based on Bonaire, Pitcairn and Tahiti designs, meaning that our preferred testing method — FCAT — won’t produce accurate results. This is a little disappointing — it means users of older cards don’t have full DX12 v-sync support, and it also means we are limited in the data we can provide.

A look at how RX 460 stacks up against GTX 950, RX 470 and R9 380. The latter strikes a mid-point between RX 460 and RX 470 that the Polaris line-up currently lacks.

1920×1080 (1080p)	RX 460 4GB Asus	RX 460 4GB Sapphire	GTX 950 LP 2GB	GTX 960 2GB	R9 380 4GB	RX 470 4GB
Assassin’s Creed Unity, Ultra High, FXAA	27.0	27.0	24.5	29.8	35.2	48.8
Ashes of the Singularity, Extreme, 0x MSAA, DX12	23.8	23.2	21.6	27.2	33.3	45.2
Crysis 3, Very High, SMAA T2x	35.0	34.9	36.7	46.4	50.2	68.0
The Division, Ultra, SMAA	27.2	27.4	25.6	33.8	37.0	37.3
Far Cry Primal, Ultra, SMAA	29.3	29.2	30. 5	37.8	41.3	54.7
Hitman, Ultra, SMAA, DX12	36.5	36.5	25.3	31.7	53.0	68.6
Rise of the Tomb Raider, Very High, High Textures, SMAA, DX12	33.4	33.6	35.3	45.0	42.8	64.1
The Witcher 3, Ultra, Post AA, No HairWorks	32.1	32.0	31.2	38.9	42.6	57.9

First of all, there are few surprises in stacking up the two top-tier RX 460s we have available — both of them offer totally identical performance and like-for-like acoustics and thermals. Until you move into the overclocking area, the products are very, very quiet.

The data offers up few surprises — the RX 470 with an additional 18 compute units offers almost twice the level of performance, leaving something of a gaping hole in AMD’s product line-up between the RX 460 and RX 470 — a gap that a product along the lines of the R9 380 fills quite nicely. Hitman aside, the RX 460 can’t match the old GTX 960, but it’s very much in the game up against the similarly priced GTX 950, where its dominance in Hitman in particular is suitably commanding. However, there is no knockout blow here. GTX 950 is faster in Crysis 3, Rise of the Tomb Raider and Far Cry Primal and within spitting distance with a few other titles.

And one more thing to point out — the GTX 950 we tested is the low-power 75W version from Asus that does not require any additional PCI Express inputs. The MSI model we have with a factory overclock adds 2-3fps over the low power version, and this may actually have been a fairer test bearing in mind that we are testing OCed versions of the RX 460 with the same additional six-pin power input.

Data is limited to DirectX 11 here, but it gives an outlook of how RX 460 slots into the existing low to mid-tier Radeon products. It effectively sits between the two Pitcairns of old — Radeon HD 7850/R7 265/R7 370 and Radeon HD 7870/R9 270/R9 270X.

1920×1080 (1080p)	RX 460 4GB	R7 260X 2GB	R7 370 2GB	R9 270X 2GB	R9 280 3GB	R9 280X 3GB
Assassin’s Creed Unity, Ultra High, FXAA	27.0	20.3	25.5	25.6	33.7	40.4
Crysis 3, Very High, SMAA T2x	35.0	26.0	34.0	38.8	45.0	52.2
The Division, Ultra, SMAA	27.2	19.3	25.3	30.2	33.1	37.8
Far Cry Primal, Ultra, SMAA	29.3	25.5	33.9	36.7	41.1	48.9
The Witcher 3, Ultra, Post AA, No HairWorks	32.1	24.4	26.5	29.0	30.6	34.1

If there’s a sense of disappointment from the RX 460, a look at this AMD-only comparison is more positive. In the US, the RX 460 is only $10 more expensive than the old Bonaire-powered R7 260X and R7 360, which both offer essentially identical performance clock-for-clock, despite the 14 vs 12 compute unit count. The benches above show that the RX 460 is much, much faster, moving more into line as a mid-point between the R7 370 (a more highly clocked Radeon R7 265 or HD 7850) and the R9 270X (aka Radeon HD 7870).

At its entry-level price-point — in the US at least — the performance on offer here is very good indeed and as a replacement for both R7 360 and R7 370, it’s a good deal. The old power-hungry Tahiti cards, R9 280/280X (aka HD 7950/7970) are considerably ahead, but the more efficient GCN architecture performs miracles with The Witcher 3, where it’s actually faster than the R9 280. This may well be down to driver optimisations when we consider that the 280 actually has twice as many compute units as the RX 460.

At its base price point, the RX 460 looks highly appealing but as the custom models and extra VRAM ramp up the prices, the RX 460 loses much of its appeal. With the RX 460 hitting up to $140/£140, the remarkable reality is that just $40/£40 more buys you over 80 per cent more performance. The pricing on the premium RX 460 models just doesn’t make sense in a world where the RX 470 even in its base configuration has everything you need for 1080p60 gameplay for not much more money.

This scene from Crysis 3 is easily repeatable and incurs a heavy, sustained load on the GPU — good for testing overclocks and heavy power draw.

	RX 460 Asus	RX 460 OC	GTX 950 LP	GTX 950	RX 470 MSI	RX 480
Peak System Power Draw	190W	202W	169W	200W	283W	271W

The premium RX 460 models can be overclocked — RAM goes up to 8gbps on the Sapphire model (we topped out at around 7.7gbps on the Asus — not that it made any worthwhile difference to the benches), but the core can only see a 5.5 per cent boost, taking us up to around 1320MHz. This isn’t so bad bearing in mind that the cards we had for testing are already factory overclocked, but the end result is a mere seven per cent of additional performance overall.

Power efficiency was a bit of a disappointment. We wanted to see AMD hand in Nvidia-beating efficiencies with its new 14nm FinFET process, but the reality is that the RX 460 doesn’t stack up so favourably against either the low power or factory overclocked GTX 950s we have on tap. The RX 460 is only 10W more efficient than a similarly factory overclocked GTX 950, which is operating on a 28nm process. Meanwhile, the low power GTX 950 we have here moves ahead considerably — it’s 31W down on its factory OC sibling and 21W more efficient than the RX 460. We use Crysis 3 as the stress test here where the low power GTX 950 is actually handing in higher performance too.

The missing data here is how the standard RX 460 2GB compares — without the factory overclock, and without the additional PCI Express power delivery. We suspect that we may claw back a fair amount of efficiency on the base SKU, but the bottom line is that even at 28nm, Nvidia’s class-leading performance here is still remarkable, and we can fully expect a 16nm FinFET replacement for GTX 950 in the fullness of time, of course.

There’s the sense that we’ve reviewed the wrong RX 460s here. We’re seeing the product at its absolute best here in terms of thermals, clocks and memory and yet the price-point for these top-tier cards simply doesn’t offer value when the much more appealing RX 470 doesn’t cost that much more, and where existing R9 380 inventories offer much better performance for lower price. Where the RX 460 scores more highly is with its base model, which acts as a direct replacement for the R7 260X and R7 360. The performance uplift here is excellent, plus there’s HDMI 2.0 and next-gen media codec support lacking in the older AMD cards.

Unfortunately, in the UK, the RX 460’s pricing isn’t quite so appealing, where the RX 460 essentially comes across more as an R7 370 replacement — albeit with improved performance in many (but not all) titles. It also puts it on a collision course with the GTX 950 — in benchmarking scenarios, the AMD card pulls ahead, but the Nvidia product has better overclockability, equivalent power efficiency, and superior driver-level performance meaning fewer CPU bottlenecks on the kind of budget PCs the card is likely to be installed in. On top of that, there’s still no AMD equivalent to the half-rate adaptive v-sync mode offered on Nvidia cards, effectively offering properly frame-paced 30fps.

All the signs point to the base-level RX 460 offering the best value and fulfilling what we believe must be the original decision brief, and there’s the sense that the premium-priced RX 460s have been manufactured in order to fill in a gaping hole in the new Radeon line-up — there’s clearly a midway point between the RX 460 and RX 470 where a product with R9 380-level performance with a 4GB framebuffer could do pretty well. The Asus and Sapphire cards are well put together and the VRAM is nice to have, but fundamentally, they are way more over-engineered than they need to be, and the price-points just don’t reflect the performance level.

AMD Radeon RX 460 specifications and reviews 012

9 0009

Go to the list of all graphics cards XTRadeon RX 6700 XTRadeon RX 6700Radeon RX 6650 XTRadeon RX 6600 6400Radeon RX 5700 XTRadeon RX 5700Radeon RX 5600 XTRadeon RX 5500 XTRadeon VIIRadeon RX Vega 64Radeon RX Vega 56Radeon RX 590Radeon RX 580 XTRRadeon RX 580Radeon RX 570Radeon RX 560Radeon RX 550Radeon RX 480Radeon RX 470Radeon RX 460Radeon R9Fury XRadeon R9 FuryRadeon R9 NanoRadeon R9 390XRadeon R9 390Radeon R9 380XRadeon R9 380Radeon R7 370Radeon R7 360Radeon R9 295X2Radeon R9 290XRadeon R9 290Radeon R9 280XRadeon R9 285 Radeon R9 280Radeon R9 270XRadeon R9 270Radeon R7 265Radeon R7 260XRadeon R7 260Radeon R7 250Radeon R7 240Radeon HD 7970Radeon HD 7950Radeon HD 7870 XTRadeon HD 7870Radeon HD 7850Radeon HD 7790Radeon HD 7770Radeon HD 7750Radeon HD 6990Radeon HD 6970Radeon HD 6950Radeon HD 6930Radeon HD 6870Radeon HD 6850Radeon HD 6790Radeon HD 6770Radeon HD 6750Radeon HD 6670 GDDR5Radeon HD 6670 GDDR3Radeon HD 6570 GDDR5Radeon HD 6570 GDDR3Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5Radeon HD 6450 GDDR3Radeon HD 5570 GDDR5Radeon HD 3750Rade on HD 3730Radeon HD 5970Radeon HD 5870Radeon HD 5850Radeon HD 5830Radeon HD 5770Radeon HD 5750Radeon HD 5670Radeon HD 5570Radeon HD 5550Radeon HD 5450Radeon HD 4890Radeon HD 4870 X2Radeon HD 4870Radeon HD 4860Radeon HD 4850 X2Radeon HD 4850Radeon HD 4830Radeon HD 4790Radeon HD 4770Radeon HD 4730Radeon HD 4670Radeon HD 4650Radeon HD 4550Radeon HD 4350Radeon HD 4290 (IGP 890GX) Radeon HD 4200 (IGP) Radeon HD 3870 X2Radeon HD 3870 Radeon HD 3850 Radeon HD 3690 Radeon HD 3650 Radeon HD 3470 Radeon HD 3450 Radeon HD 3300 (IGP) Radeon HD 3200 (IGP) 0 (IGP)Radeon HD 2900 XT 1Gb GDDR4Radeon HD 2900 XTRadeon HD 2900 PRORadeon HD 2900 GTRadeon HD 2600 XT DUALRadeon HD 2600 XT GDDR4Radeon HD 2600 XTRadeon HD 2600 PRORadeon HD 2400 XTRadeon HD 2400 PRORadeon HD 2350Radeon X1950 CrossFire EditionRadeon X19 50 XTXRadeon X1950 XTRadeon X1950 PRO DUALRadeon X1950 PRORadeon X1950 GTRadeon X1900 CrossFire EditionRadeon X1900 XTXRadeon X1900 XTRadeon X1900 GT Rev2Radeon X1900 GTRadeon X1800 CrossFire EditionRadeon X1800 XT PE 512MBRadeon X1800 XTRadeon X1800 XLRadeon X1800 GTORadeon X1650 XTR adeon X1650 GTRadeon X1650 XL DDR3Radeon X1650 XL DDR2Radeon X1650 PRO on RV530XTRadeon X1650 PRO on RV535XTRadeon X1650Radeon X1600 XTRadeon X1600 PRORadeon X1550 PRORadeon X1550Radeon X1550 LERadeon X1300 XT on RV530ProRadeon X1300 XT on RV535ProRadeon X1300 CERadeon X1300 ProRadeon X1300Radeon X1300 LERadeon X1300 HMRadeon X1050Radeon X850 XT Platinum Edition Radeon X850 XT CrossFire EditionRadeon X850 XT Radeon X850 Pro Radeon X800 XT Platinum EditionRadeon X800 XTRadeon X800 CrossFire EditionRadeon X800 XLRadeon X800 GTO 256MBRadeon X800 GTO 128MBRadeon X800 GTO2 256MBRadeon X800Radeon X800 ProRadeon X800 GT 256MBRadeon X800 GT Radeon X550 XTRadeon X550Radeon X300 SE 128MB HM-256MBRadeon X300 SE 32MB HM-128MBRadeon X300Radeon X300 SERadeon 9800 XTRadeon 9800 PRO /DDR IIRadeon 9800 PRO /DDRRadeon 9800Radeon 9800 SE-256 bitRadeon 9800 SE-128 bitRadeon 9700 PRORadeon 9700Radeon 9600 XTRadeon 9600 PRORadeon 9600Radeon 9600 SERadeon 9 600 TXRadeon 9550 XTRadeon 9550Radeon 9550 SERadeon 9500 PRORadeon 9500 /128 MBRadeon 9500 /64 MBRadeon 9250Radeon 9200 PRORadeon 9200Radeon 9200 SERadeon 9000 PRORadeon 9000Radeon 9000 XTRadeon 8500 LE / 9100Radeon 8500Radeon 7500Radeon 7200 Radeon LE Radeon DDR OEM Radeon DDR Radeon SDR Radeon VE / 7000Rage 128 GL Rage 128 VR Rage 128 PRO AFRRage 128 PRORage 1283D Rage ProIntelArc A770 16GBArc A770 8GBArc A750Arc A380Arc A310NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090GeForce RTX 4080GeForce RTX 4080 12GBGeForce RTX 4070 TiGeForce RTX 4070GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GBGeForce RTX 4060 TiGeForce RTX 4060GeForce RTX 3090 TiGeForce RTX 3090GeForce RTX 30 80 TiGeForce RTX 3080 12GBGeForce RTX 3080GeForce RTX 3070 TiGeForce RTX 3070GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6XGeForce RTX 3060 TiGeForce RTX 3060 rev. 2GeForce RTX 3060GeForce RTX 3050GeForce RTX 2080 TiGeForce RTX 2080 SuperGeForce RTX 2080GeForce RTX 2070 SuperGeForce RTX 2070GeForce RTX 2060 SuperGeForce RTX 2060GeForce GTX 1660 TiGeForce GTX 1660 SuperGeForce GTX 1660GeForce GTX 1650 SuperGeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6GeForce GTX 1650 rev.3GeForce GTX 1650 rev.2GeForce GTX 1650GeForce GTX 1630GeForce Titan X GeForce GTX 980 TiGeForce GTX 980GeForce GTX 970GeForce GTX 960GeForce GTX 950GeForce GTX TitanGeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce GTX 780GeForce GTX 770GeForce GTX 760GeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 750GeForce GT 740 GeForce GT 730GeForce GTX 690GeForce GTX 680GeForce GTX 670GeForce GTX 660 TiGeForce GTX 660GeForce GTX 650 Ti BoostGeForce GTX 650 TiGeForce GTX 650GeForce GT 640 rev.2GeForce GT 640GeForce GT 630 rev.2GeForce GT 630GeForce GTX 590GeForce GTX 580GeForce GTX 570GeForce GTX 560 TiGeForce GTX 560GeForce GTX 550 TiGeForce GT 520GeForce GTX 480G eForce GTX 470GeForce GTX 465GeForce GTX 460 SEGeForce GTX 460 1024MBGeForce GTX 460 768MBGeForce GTS 450GeForce GT 440 GDDR5GeForce GT 440 GDDR3GeForce GT 430GeForce GT 420GeForce GTX 295GeForce GTX 285GeForce GTX 280GeForce GTX 275GeForce GTX 260 rev. 2GeForce GTX 260GeForce GTS 250GeForce GTS 240GeForce GT 240GeForce GT 230GeForce GT 220GeForce 210Geforce 205GeForce GTS 150GeForce GT 130GeForce GT 120GeForce G100GeForce 9800 GTX+ GeForce 9800 GTXGeForce 9800 GTSGeForce 9800 GTGeForce 9800 GX2GeForce 9600 GTGeForce 9600 GSO (G94)GeForce 9600 GSOGeForce 9500 GTGeForce 9500 GSGeForce 9400 GTGeForce 9400GeForce 9300GeForce 8800 ULTRAGeForce 8800 GTXGeForce 8800 GTS Rev2GeForce 8800 GTSGeForce 8800 GTGeForce 8800 GS 768MBGeForce 8800 GS 384MBGeForce 8600 GTSGeForce 8600 GTGeForce 8600 GSGeForce 8500 GT DDR3GeForce 8500 GT DDR2GeForce 8400 GSGeForce 8300GeForce 8200GeForce 8100GeForce 7950 GX2GeForce 7950 GTGeForce 7900 GTXGeForce 7900 GTOGeForce 7900 GTGeForce 7900 GSGeForce 7800 GTX 512MBGeForce 7800 GTXGeForce 7800 GTGeForce 7800 GS AGPGeForce 7800 GSGeForce 7600 GT Rev.2GeForce 7600 GTGeForce 7600 GS 256MBGeForce 7600 GS 7100 GS TC 128 (512)GeForce 6800 Ultra 512MBGeForce 6800 UltraGeForce 6800 GT 256MBGeForce 6800 GT 128MBGeForce 6800 GTOGeForce 6800 256MB PCI-EGeForce 6800 128MB PCI-EGeForce 68 00 LE PCI-EGeForce 6800 256MB AGPGeForce 6800 128MB AGPGeForce 6800 LE AGPGeForce 6800 GS AGPGeForce 6800 GS PCI-EGeForce 6800 XTGeForce 6600 GT PCI-EGeForce 6600 GT AGPGeForce 6600 DDR2GeForce 6600 PCI-EGeForce 6600 AGPGeForce 6600 LEGeForce 6200 NV43VGeForce 6200GeForce 6200 NV43AGeForce 6 500GeForce 6200TC 64(256)GeForce 6200TC 32(128)GeForce 6200TC 16(128)GeForce PCX5950GeForce PCX 5900GeForce PCX 5750GeForce PCX 5550GeForce PCX 5300GeForce PCX 4300GeForce FX 5950 UltraGeForce FX 5900 UltraGeForce FX 5900GeForce FX 5900 ZTGeForce FX 5900 XTGeForce FX 5800 UltraGeForce FX 5800GeForce FX 5700 Ultra /DDR-3GeForce FX 5700 Ultra /DDR-2GeForce FX 5700GeForce FX 5700 LEGeForce FX GeForce FX 5600 Ultra (rev. 1) SEGeForce 4 Ti 4200-8xGeForce 4 Ti 4600GeForce 4 Ti 4400GeForce 4 Ti 4200GeForce 4 MX 4000GeForce 4 MX 440-8x / 480GeForce 4 MX Force 3GeForce 2 Ti VXGeForce 2 TitaniumGeForce 2 UltraGeForce 2 PROGeForce 2 GTSGeForce 2 MX 400GeForce 2 MX 200GeForce 2 MXGeForce 256 DDRGeForce 256Riva TNT 2 UltraRiva TNT 2 PRORiva TNT 2Riva TNT 2 M64Riva TNT 2 Vanta LTRiva TNT 2 VantaRiva TNTRiva 128 ZXRiva 128

You can simultaneously select
up to 10 video cards by holding Ctrl

Reviews of video cards AMD Radeon RX 460:

ASUS ROG Strix RX 460 video card review and testing

ASUS ROG STRIX-RX460-O4G-GAMING
Testing AMD Radeon RX 460 using Sapphire Nitro RX 460 4G D5 as an example

Sapphire Nitro RX 460 4G D5

Radeon RX 460 [in 6 benchmarks]

Description

AMD started Radeon RX 460 sales on August 8, 2016 at a suggested price of $86. This is a desktop card based on the Polaris architecture and 14 nm manufacturing process, primarily aimed at gamers. It has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory at 7 GHz, and coupled with a 128-bit interface, this creates a bandwidth of 112.0 Gb / s.

In terms of compatibility, this is a dual-slot PCIe 3.0 x8 card. The length of the reference version is 170 mm. An additional power cable is not required for connection, and the power consumption is 75 W.

It provides poor performance in tests and games at the level of

10.53%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 130

Information about the type (desktop or laptop) and architecture of the Radeon RX 460, as well as when sales started and cost at the time.

900 11 3.09

9001 1 Desktop

9 0009

Performance ranking	352
Value for money
Architecture	Polaris (2016-2019)
GPU	Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Release date	August 8, 2016 (6 years ago)
Price at release	$86	$316 (3. 7x)	of 168889 (A100 PCIe 80 GB)

quality

Performance to price ratio. The higher the better.

Features

Radeon RX 460’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. They indirectly speak of Radeon RX 460’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

900 11 1200 MHz

The number of stream processors	896	from 20480 (Data Center GPU MAX Next)
Core clock	1090 MHz	of 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT)
Boost clock	of 3599 (Radeon RX 7990 XTX)
Number of transistors	3.000 million	out of 14400 (GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (mobile))
Workflow 900 12	14 nm	out of 4 (GeForce RTX 4080)
TDP	75W	out of 2400 (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem)
Texturing Speed	67. 20	of 969.9 (h200 SXM5 96 GB)
Floating point performance	2.150 gflops	of 16384 (Radeon Pro Duo)

Compatibility and dimensions

Information on Radeon RX 460 compatibility with other computer components. Useful for example when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one. For desktop video cards, these are the interface and connection bus (compatibility with the motherboard), the physical dimensions of the video card (compatibility with the motherboard and case), additional power connectors (compatibility with the power supply).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	170mm
Thickness	2 slots power connectors	no

RAM

Parameters of the memory installed on Radeon RX 460 — type, size, bus, frequency and bandwidth. For video cards built into the processor that do not have their own memory, a shared part of the RAM is used.

Memory type	GDDR5
Maximum memory	9014 9 4 GB	of 128 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory bus width	128 bit	of 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory frequency	7000 MHz	9 0149 of 22400 (GeForce RTX 4080)
Memory bandwidth	112.0 Gb/s	of 3276 (Aldebaran)
Shared memory	—

Video outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on Radeon RX 460. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for laptop ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.

Video connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI 9001 2	+