AMD RX 560 vs Nvidia GT 1030
- CPU
- GPU
- SSD
- HDD
- RAM
- USB
▲
605,748
▼
Release date ≈ Q2 2017.
VS
YouTube*NEW*
About
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 226,355 user samples
Benchmark your GPU here
171,815 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 15% Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB
Worst Bench: 12% MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB
Poor: 12%
Great: 15%
SPEED RANK: 228th / 688
54,540 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 27% Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 17% Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 17%
Great: 27%
SPEED RANK: 171st / 688
| Effective 3D Speed Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed |
14. |
22.6 % | Much faster effective speed. +58% |
| Lighting Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) |
17.6 fps | 26.2 fps | Much better lighting effects. +49% |
|||
| Reflection Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) |
17.1 fps | 28 fps | Much better reflection handling. +64% |
|||
| MRender Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) |
13.8 fps | 27.4 fps | Hugely faster multi rendering. +99% |
|||
| Gravity Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) |
18. 8 fps |
30.7 fps | Much faster NBody calculation. +63% |
| Lighting Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) |
19 fps | 32.1 fps | Much better peak lighting effects. +69% |
|||
| Reflection High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) |
21.7 fps | 30.4 fps | Much better peak reflection handling. +40% |
|||
| MRender Render target array GShader (Sphere) |
16.3 fps | 29.2 fps | Much faster peak multi rendering. +79% |
|||
| Gravity NBody particle system (Galaxy) |
20 fps | 35. 9 fps |
Much faster peak NBody calculation. +80% |
| CSGO Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
87 Fps | 110 Fps | Better CSGO Fps. +25% |
|||
| Fortnite Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
44 Fps | 52 Fps | Better Fortnite Fps. +19% |
|||
| GTAV Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
35 Fps | 50 Fps | Much Better GTAV Fps. +41% |
|||
| LoL Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
102 Fps | 121 Fps | Better LoL Fps. +19% |
|||
| Minecraft Avg.  Fps @ 1080p on Max
|
112 Fps | 123 Fps | Better Minecraft Fps. +10% |
Market Share
Based on 56,014,841 GPUs tested.
See market share leaders
| Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days) |
0.64 % | Hugely higher market share. +700% |
0.08 % | |||
| User Rating UBM User Rating |
60 % | Slightly more popular. +7% |
56 % |
| Age Newest |
65+ Months | 65 Months | ||||
| Parallax Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) |
19. 8 fps |
42.6 fps | Hugely better peak texture detail. +115% |
|||
| Splatting Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) |
17.9 fps | 27.2 fps | Much faster peak complex splatting. +52% |
|||
| Parallax Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) |
17.7 fps | 37.6 fps | Hugely better texture detail. +112% |
|||
| Splatting Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) |
16.3 fps | 23.3 fps | Much faster complex splatting. +43% |
ADVERTISEMENT
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.
CHOOSE A COMPONENT:
CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance)
November 2022 GPU Rankings.
We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]
ADVERTISEMENT
Group Test Results
- Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
- Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.
- Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.
Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.
UserBenchmark of the month
Gaming
Desktop
ProGaming
CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB
How it works
- — Download and run UserBenchmark.
- — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
- — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.
com. - — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- — See speed test results from other users.
- — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Frequently Asked Questions
Best User Rated
-
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti
-
Nvidia RTX 3070
-
Nvidia RTX 3050
-
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)
-
Nvidia RTX 3080
-
Nvidia RTX 4090
-
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)
-
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB
-
Nvidia RTX 2060
-
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)
-
AMD RX 6600-XT
-
AMD RX 5600-XT
About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube
Feedback
GeForce GT 1030 vs Radeon RX 560
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 1030 |
45 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon RX 560 . |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon RX 560 |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports FreeSync |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports TrueAudio |
| Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon RX 560
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GT 1030 | Radeon RX 560 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPU Name | GP108 (GP108-300-A1) | vs | Baffin (Baffin XT) | |
| Fab Process | 14 nm | vs | 14 nm | |
| Die Size | 74 mm² | vs | 123 mm² | |
| Transistors | 1,800 million | vs | 3,000 million | |
| Shaders | 384 | vs | 1024 | |
| Compute Units | 3 | vs | 16 | |
| Core clock | 1228 MHz | vs | 1090 MHz | |
| ROPs | 16 | vs | 16 | |
| TMUs | 24 | vs | 64 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GT 1030 | Radeon RX 560 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5 | |
| Bus Width | 64 bit | vs | 128 bit | |
| Memory Speed | 1502 MHz 6008 MHz effective |
vs | 1750 MHz 7000 MHz effective |
|
| Memory Size | 2048 Mb | vs | 4096 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GT 1030 | Radeon RX 560 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30 watts | vs | 75 watts | |
| Release Date | 17 May 2017 | vs | 1 Apr 2017 |
-
GeForce GT 1030
23.
49 GP/s -
Radeon RX 560
19.20 GP/s
GigaPixels — higher is better
-
GeForce GT 1030
35.23 GT/s
-
Radeon RX 560
76.80 GT/s
GigaTexels — higher is better
-
GeForce GT 1030
48.06 GB/s
-
Radeon RX 560
112.00 GB/s
GB/s — higher is better
-
GeForce GT 1030
1127.00 GFLOPs
-
Radeon RX 560
2457.60 GFLOPs
GFLOPs — higher is better
| VS | ||
| GeForce GT 1030 | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| VS | ||
| GeForce GT 1030 | Radeon Vega 8 |
| VS | ||
| Radeon RX 560 | Radeon RX 460 |
| VS | ||
| Radeon RX 560 | GeForce GTX 950 |
| VS | ||
| GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB | GeForce GTX 1050 |
| VS | ||
| GeForce GTX 1050 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.