AMD RX 570 vs Nvidia GTX 970
- CPU
- GPU
- SSD
- HDD
- RAM
- USB
VS
YouTube*NEW*
About
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 1,225,498 user samples
Benchmark your GPU here
809,548 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 55% Gigabyte(1458 367A)
Worst Bench: 45% Asus(1043 8508)
Poor: 45%
Great: 55%
SPEED RANK: 106th / 688
415,950 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 38% MSI(1462 341B)
Poor: 38%
Great: 52%
SPEED RANK: 116th / 688
Effective 3D Speed Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed |
50. 2 % | Slightly faster effective speed. +8% |
46.4 % |
Lighting Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) |
61.3 fps | Better lighting effects. +12% |
54.6 fps | |||
Reflection Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) |
71.5 fps | Better reflection handling. +21% |
59 fps | |||
MRender Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) |
67.8 fps | Faster multi rendering. +14% |
59.3 fps | |||
Gravity Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) |
62. 2 fps | +2% | 61.2 fps |
Lighting Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) |
69 fps | Better peak lighting effects. +10% |
62.6 fps | |||
Reflection High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) |
93.1 fps | Much better peak reflection handling. +48% |
63.1 fps | |||
MRender Render target array GShader (Sphere) |
71.2 fps | Faster peak multi rendering. +15% |
61.7 fps | |||
Gravity NBody particle system (Galaxy) |
67.6 fps | 67. 7 fps | +0% |
CSGO Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
156 Fps | Better CSGO Fps. +25% |
124 Fps | |||
Fortnite Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
94 Fps | Better Fortnite Fps. +15% |
81 Fps | |||
PUBG Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
63 Fps | +1% | 62 Fps | |||
GTAV Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
53 Fps | 54 Fps | +2% | |||
LoL Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
156 Fps | Better LoL Fps. +14% |
137 Fps | |||
Overwatch Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
97 Fps | Slightly Better Overwatch Fps. +8% |
90 Fps | |||
BF1 Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
62 Fps | Better BF1 Fps. +27% |
49 Fps | |||
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
48 Fps | 48 Fps | +1% | |||
Minecraft Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
189 Fps | Better Minecraft Fps. +23% |
154 Fps | |||
DOTA 2 Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
121 Fps | Better DOTA 2 Fps. +11% |
109 Fps | |||
WoW Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
63 Fps | 68 Fps | Slightly Better WoW Fps. +8% |
|||
WoT Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
97 Fps | Better WoT Fps. +15% |
85 Fps |
Market Share
Based on 56,013,683 GPUs tested.
See market share leaders
Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days) |
1.23 % | Much higher market share. +43% |
0.86 % | |||
Value Value For Money |
35 % | 84. 2 % | Hugely better value. +141% |
|||
User Rating UBM User Rating |
69 % | +5% | 66 % | |||
Price Price (score) |
$340 | $130 | Much cheaper. +62% |
Age Newest |
98 Months | 66 Months | Much more recent. +33% |
|||
Parallax Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) |
69.7 fps | 86.5 fps | Better peak texture detail. +24% |
|||
Splatting Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) |
59. 8 fps | Faster peak complex splatting. +29% |
46.2 fps | |||
Parallax Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) |
62.4 fps | 77 fps | Better texture detail. +23% |
|||
Splatting Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) |
54 fps | Faster complex splatting. +24% |
43.7 fps |
ADVERTISEMENT
The Nvidia GTX 970 is a game changer in terms of performance per watt and value for money. The GTX 970 is based on Nvidia’s ground-breaking Maxwell architecture which delivers considerable clock for clock performance gains over Kepler, its predecessor. Comparing the GTX 970 and 780 Ti shows that the two cards offer comparable performance yet the new GTX 970 costs nearly half as much! Unsurprisingly Nvidia are discontinuing the 780 Ti as it’s now largely redundant. These price to performance gains typically occur once or twice a decade and although the new Maxwell architecture will improve down the line with the release of the Ti/Titan versions, at the moment the 970 offers the best value for money on the market by miles. Since this summary was originally written AMD have slashed prices and older Nvidia models (780/780 Ti/770) have also been hugely discounted. See the latest value for money rankings here. [Jul ’15 GPUPro]
MORE DETAILS
The Radeon RX 570 is the second in the line-up of AMD’s 500 series of GPUs targeting the popular mid-range market. The 500 series is based on the second generation Polaris architecture and is a minor upgrade over the 400 series. The RX 570 is around 10% faster than its predecessor, the RX 470. With 2048 cores, it is a cut down version of the RX 580 which is $30 more expensive and around 20% faster. At $130, the RX 570 offers superb value to gamers on a very tight budget. By dropping detail levels slightly below maximum the RX 570 can deliver 60 EFps in most of today’s popular games. If at all possible, we would suggest spending around $50 more for the 30% faster 8GB RX 590 which can comfortably hold 60+ EFps at 1080p with maximum details. [Nov ’19 GPUPro]
MORE DETAILS
Systems with these GPUs
Top Builds that include these GPUs
- MSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917) (3,145)
- Asus Z170 PRO GAMING (2,497)
- Asus Z97-A (1,906)
- Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING (1,689)
- MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) (1,521)
- Asus Z170-A (1,441)
- MSI Z97 PC Mate(MS-7850) (1,322)
- Gigabyte B450M DS3H (6,700)
- Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF (4,411)
- Asus PRIME A320M-K (4,205)
- Asrock B450M Pro4 (3,251)
- Asus PRIME B450M-A (3,176)
- Gigabyte GA-B450M S2H (2,885)
- Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING (2,869)
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.
CHOOSE A COMPONENT:
CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance)
November 2022 GPU Rankings.
We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]
ADVERTISEMENT
Group Test Results
- Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
- Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.
- Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.
Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.
UserBenchmark of the month
Gaming
Desktop
ProGaming
CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB
How it works
- — Download and run UserBenchmark.
- — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
- — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
- — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- — See speed test results from other users.
- — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Frequently Asked Questions
Best User Rated
-
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti
-
Nvidia RTX 3070
-
Nvidia RTX 3050
-
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)
-
Nvidia RTX 3080
-
Nvidia RTX 4090
-
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)
-
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB
-
Nvidia RTX 2060
-
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)
-
AMD RX 6600-XT
-
AMD RX 5600-XT
About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube
Feedback
AMD RX 570 vs Nvidia GTX 980-Ti
- CPU
- GPU
- SSD
- HDD
- RAM
- USB
VS
YouTube*NEW*
About
▲
6611,524
▼
BUY • $130
Release date: Q2 2017.
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 634,397 user samples
Benchmark your GPU here
218,447 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 89% Asus(1043 8565) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 69% MSI(1462 3235) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 69%
Great: 89%
SPEED RANK: 66th / 688
415,950 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 38% MSI(1462 341B)
Poor: 38%
Great: 52%
SPEED RANK: 116th / 688
Effective 3D Speed Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed |
79.9 % | Much faster effective speed. +72% |
46.4 % |
Lighting Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) |
99.2 fps | Hugely better lighting effects. +82% |
54.6 fps | |||
Reflection Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) |
118 fps | Hugely better reflection handling. +100% |
59 fps | |||
MRender Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) |
98.6 fps | Much faster multi rendering. +66% |
59.3 fps | |||
Gravity Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) |
98.6 fps | Much faster NBody calculation. +61% |
61.2 fps |
Lighting Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) |
113 fps | Hugely better peak lighting effects. +81% |
62.6 fps | |||
Reflection High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) |
158 fps | Hugely better peak reflection handling. +150% |
63.1 fps | |||
MRender Render target array GShader (Sphere) |
106 fps | Much faster peak multi rendering. +72% |
61.7 fps | |||
Gravity NBody particle system (Galaxy) |
108 fps | Much faster peak NBody calculation. +60% |
67.7 fps |
CSGO Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
196 Fps | Much Better CSGO Fps. +58% |
124 Fps | |||
Fortnite Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
121 Fps | Much Better Fortnite Fps. +49% |
81 Fps | |||
PUBG Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
81 Fps | Much Better PUBG Fps. +31% |
62 Fps | |||
GTAV Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
80 Fps | Much Better GTAV Fps. +48% |
54 Fps | |||
LoL Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
215 Fps | Much Better LoL Fps. +57% |
137 Fps | |||
Overwatch Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
115 Fps | Better Overwatch Fps. +27% |
90 Fps | |||
BF1 Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
98 Fps | Hugely Better BF1 Fps. +99% |
49 Fps | |||
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
82 Fps | Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps. +70% |
48 Fps | |||
Minecraft Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
244 Fps | Much Better Minecraft Fps. +58% |
154 Fps | |||
DOTA 2 Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
153 Fps | Much Better DOTA 2 Fps. +40% |
109 Fps | |||
WoW Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
91 Fps | Much Better WoW Fps. +33% |
68 Fps | |||
WoT Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
121 Fps | Much Better WoT Fps. +42% |
85 Fps |
Market Share
Based on 56,013,683 GPUs tested.
See market share leaders
Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days) |
0.26 % | 0.86 % | Hugely higher market share. +231% |
|||
Value Value For Money |
33.8 % | 84.2 % | Hugely better value. +149% |
|||
User Rating UBM User Rating |
66 % | 66 % | ||||
Price Price (score) |
$560 | $130 | Much cheaper. +77% |
Age Newest |
90 Months | 66 Months | More recent. +27% |
|||
Parallax Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) |
112 fps | Better peak texture detail. +29% |
86.5 fps | |||
Splatting Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) |
97.9 fps | Hugely faster peak complex splatting. +112% |
46.2 fps | |||
Parallax Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) |
101 fps | Much better texture detail. +31% |
77 fps | |||
Splatting Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) |
88.2 fps | Hugely faster complex splatting. +102% |
43.7 fps |
ADVERTISEMENT
The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don’t have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn’t possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May ’15 GPUPro]
MORE DETAILS
The Radeon RX 570 is the second in the line-up of AMD’s 500 series of GPUs targeting the popular mid-range market. The 500 series is based on the second generation Polaris architecture and is a minor upgrade over the 400 series. The RX 570 is around 10% faster than its predecessor, the RX 470. With 2048 cores, it is a cut down version of the RX 580 which is $30 more expensive and around 20% faster. At $130, the RX 570 offers superb value to gamers on a very tight budget. By dropping detail levels slightly below maximum the RX 570 can deliver 60 EFps in most of today’s popular games. If at all possible, we would suggest spending around $50 more for the 30% faster 8GB RX 590 which can comfortably hold 60+ EFps at 1080p with maximum details. [Nov ’19 GPUPro]
MORE DETAILS
Systems with these GPUs
Top Builds that include these GPUs
- Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO (1,040)
- Asus Z170 PRO GAMING (886)
- Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING (608)
- Asus Z170-A (586)
- MSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917) (542)
- MSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977) (498)
- Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (388)
- Gigabyte B450M DS3H (6,700)
- Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF (4,411)
- Asus PRIME A320M-K (4,205)
- Asrock B450M Pro4 (3,251)
- Asus PRIME B450M-A (3,176)
- Gigabyte GA-B450M S2H (2,885)
- Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING (2,869)
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.
CHOOSE A COMPONENT:
CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance)
November 2022 GPU Rankings.
We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]
ADVERTISEMENT
Group Test Results
- Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
- Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.
- Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.
Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.
UserBenchmark of the month
Gaming
Desktop
ProGaming
CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB
How it works
- — Download and run UserBenchmark.
- — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.