GPU FPS Benchmark: GeForce RTX 2080 Ti vs Radeon RX 5700 XT
GPU FPS Benchmark
-
Benchmarks - GeForce RTX 2080 Ti ? Radeon RX 5700 XT
Comparison and key differences summary
- GeForce RTX 2080 Ti outperforms Radeon RX 5700 XT @ 1920×1080 resolution by average 24% more FPS.
- GeForce RTX 2080 Ti outperforms Radeon RX 5700 XT @ 2560×1440 resolution by average 24% more FPS.
- GeForce RTX 2080 Ti outperforms Radeon RX 5700 XT @ 3840×2160 resolution by average 31% more FPS.
Find
VS
Find
FPS Comparisons
GeForce RTX 2070
VS
GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
Radeon RX 570
VS
Radeon VII
GeForce GTX 1080
VS
GeForce RTX 2060
Components price will be taken from the selected region.
Global (USD $)
Argentina (ARS $)
Australia (AUD $)
Austria (EUR €)
Bahrain (BHD BHD)
Belgium (EUR €)
Brasil (BRL R$)
Canada (CAD CA$)
Denmark (DKK kr.
)
France (EUR €)
Germany (EUR €)
Hong Kong (HKD HKD$)
Ireland (EUR €)
Japan (JPY ¥)
Kuwait (KWD KWD)
India (INR ₹)
Israel (ILS ₪)
Italia (EUR €)
Mexico (MXN MXN$)
Netherlands (EUR €)
New Zealand (NZD NZ$)
Norway (NOK kr)
Oman (OMR OMR)
Philippines (PHP ₱)
Qatar (QAR QAR)
Saudi Arabia (SAR ر.
س)
Singapore (SGD S$)
South Korea (KRW ₩)
Spain (EUR €)
Sweden (SEK kr)
Switzerland (CHF CHF)
Thailand (THB ฿)
Turkey (TRY ₺)
UAE (AED AED)
United Kingdom (GBP £)
rtx 2080 Ti vs rx 5700 xt for Gaming PC build
Specs
| rtx 2080 Ti | rx 5700 xt | |
|---|---|---|
| Average Price | $1318 | $429 |
| Brand | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Memory | 11G | 8G |
Gaming performance (working with i7 7700k, Ultra quality)
| FPS (rtx 2080 Ti) | FPS (rx 5700 xt) | |
|---|---|---|
| A Way Out | 188. 8 |
134.2 |
| AirMech Strike | 177.3 | 126.1 |
| apexlegends | 141.4 | 100.5 |
| Battlefield 4 | 92.4 | 65.7 |
| BATTLETECH | 118.2 | 84 |
| Call of Duty ww2 | 195.1 | 138.7 |
| CSGO | 342.1 | 243.2 |
| destiny2 | 167.7 | 119.2 |
| DOTA2 | 226.7 | 161.2 |
| Far Cry 5 | 147.5 | 104.9 |
| Fortnite | 178.2 | 126.7 |
| Frostpunk | 181.1 | 128.7 |
| GTA | 116.5 | 82.9 |
| LOL | 309.2 | 219.8 |
| overwatch | 220.2 | 156.6 |
| Path of Exile | 217. 2 |
154.4 |
| PUBG | 115.2 | 81.9 |
| Radical Heights | 129.6 | 92.2 |
| rainbow6siege | 135.9 | 96.6 |
| Sea of Thieves | 182.1 | 129.5 |
| StarCraft 2 | 206.9 | 147.1 |
| Total War THREE KINGDOMS | 106.7 | 75.9 |
| Warframe | 235.8 | 167.6 |
| World of Tanks | 96.3 | 68.5 |
Conclusion
Price to Performance: rx 5700 xt is better.
(67% Lower on Price,
29% Lower on performance.)
All resources
Games:
A Way Out AirMech Strike Apex Legends Battlefield 4 BATTLETECH Call of Duty WWII Counter-Strike: Global Offensive Destiny 2 Dota 2 Far Cry 5 Fortnite Frostpunk Grand Theft Auto V League of Legends Overwatch Path of Exile PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds Radical Heights Rainbow Six | Siege Sea of Thieves StarCraft 2 Total War THREE KINGDOMS Warframe World of Tanks
GPUs:
RX 570rx 5700rx 5700 xtRX 580rx 590RX Vega 64gtx 1050gtx 1050 Tigtx 1060 3Ggtx 1060 6Ggtx 1070gtx 1070 Tigtx 1080gtx 1080 Tigtx 1660gtx 1660 supergtx 1660 Tigtx 970gtx 980gtx 980 Tigtx Titan Xrtx 2060rtx 2060 superrtx 2070rtx 2070 superrtx 2080rtx 2080 TiRTX 3070
CPUs:
Ryzen 5 1600xRyzen 5 2600Ryzen 5 2600xRyzen 5 3600Ryzen 5 3600xRyzen 7 1700XRyzen 7 3700xRyzen 7 3800xRyzen 7 3900xi3 7100i5 10400i5 7500i5 7600ki5 8400i5 8600ki5 9400fi7 10700ki7 7700Ki7 8700Ki7 9700ki7 9900k
What is better than the Galax GeForce RTX 2080 Ti OC or Sapphire Radeon RX 6800 XT
Galax GeForce RTX 2080 Ti OC
SAPPHire RADEON RX 6800 XT 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000.
000 -clock. high clock speed.
1350MHz
max 2459
Average: 1124.9 MHz
1825MHz
max 2459
Average: 1124.9MHz
GPU memory frequency
This is an important aspect calculating memory bandwidth
1750MHz
max 16000
Average: 1468 MHz
2000MHz
max 16000
Average: 1468 MHz
FLOPS
The measurement of processing power of a processor is called FLOPS.
13.83TFLOPS
max 1142.32
Average: 53 TFLOPS
20.
51TFLOPS
max 1142.32
Average: 53 TFLOPS
RAM
11GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
16 GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
Turbo GPU
If the GPU speed drops below its limit, it can switch to a high clock speed to improve performance.
Show all
1620MHz
max 2903
Average: 1514 MHz
2250MHz
max 2903
Average: 1514 MHz
Texture size
A certain number of textured pixels are displayed on the screen every second.
Show all
440.6 GTexels/s
max 756.8
Average: 145.4 GTexels/s
648 GTexels/s
nine0005
max 756.8
Average: 145.4 GTexels/s
Architecture name
Turn
Navi / RDNA2
Graphic processor name
TURING TU102
NAVI 21
This is the rate at which the device stores or reads information. nine0005
616GB/s
max 2656
Average: 257.8 GB/s
512GB/s
max 2656
Average: 257.8 GB/s
Effective memory speed
The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and information transfer rate of the memory.
The performance of the device in applications depends on the clock frequency. The higher it is, the better.
Show all
14000MHz
nine0005
max 19500
Average: 6984.5 MHz
16000 MHz
max 19500
Average: 6984.5 MHz
RAM
11GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
16 GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
GDDR Memory Versions
Latest GDDR memory versions provide high data transfer rates to improve overall performance
Show all
6
Mean: 4.
9
6
Mean: 4.9
Memory bus width
A wide memory bus means that it can transfer more information in one cycle. This property affects the performance of the memory as well as the overall performance of the device’s graphics card.
Show all
352bit
max 8192
Average: 283.9bit
256bit
nine0005
max 8192
Average: 283.9bit
Heat dissipation (TDP)
Heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
Show all
250W
Average value: 160 W
300W
Average value: 160 W
Process
The small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip.
12 nm
Average: 34.7 nm
7 nm
Average: 34.7 nm
Number of transistors
The higher their number, the more processor power it indicates
18600 million
max 80000
Average: 7150 million
26800 million
max 80000
Average: 7150 million
PCIe version
Considerable speed is provided by the expansion card used to connect the computer to peripherals. The updated versions have impressive throughput and provide high performance.
Show all
3
Average: 3
4
Average: 3
Width
283mm
max 421.
7
Average: 192.1mm
266.7mm
max 421.7
Average: 192.1mm
Height
139mm
max 619
Average: 89.6mm
119.8mm
max 619
Average: 89.6mm
DirectX
Used in demanding games, providing enhanced graphics
12
max 12.2
Mean: 11.4
12
max 12.2
Mean: 11.4
OpenCL version
Used by some applications to enable GPU power for non-graphical calculations.
The newer the version, the more functional it will be
Show all
2
max 4.6
Average: 2.2
nine0005
2
max 4.6
Average: 2.2
opengl version
Later versions provide better game graphics
4.5
max 4.6
Average: 4.2
4.6
max 4.6
Average: 4.2
Shader model version
6.5
max 6.6
Average: 5.9
6.5
max 6.6
Average: 5.
9
version Vulkan
1.2
1.2
version CUDA
7.5
No data
has an HDMI output
HDMI exit allows you to connect devices with HDMI or mini-HDMI ports. They can transmit video and audio to the display.
Full text
Yes
Yes
HDMI version
The latest version provides a wide signal transmission channel due to the increased number of audio channels, frames per second, etc.
Show all
2
max 2.1
Mean: 1.9
max 2.1
Mean: 1.9
DisplayPort
Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort
3
Average: 2.
2
nine0005
2
Average: 2.2
Number of HDMI sockets
The more there are, the more devices can be connected at the same time (for example, game/TV type consoles)
Show all
one
Average: 1.1
one
Average: 1.1
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x16
HDMI
Yes
Yes
Passmark score
21276
max 29325
Average: 7628.6
22952
max 29325
Average: 7628.6
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test score
161820
max 191204
Average: 80042.
3
189192
max 191204
Average: 80042.3
nine0005
3DMark Fire Strike Score
25702
max 38276
Average: 12463
37886
max 38276
Average: 12463
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test score
19806
max 49575
Average: 11859.1
48740
max 49575
Average: 11859.one
3DMark 11 Performance GPU score
46223
max 57937
Average: 18799.
9
51005
max 57937
Average: 18799.9
3DMark Vantage Performance score
81885
max 97887
Average: 37830.6
94586
max 97887
Average: 37830.6
nine0005
3DMark Ice Storm GPU score
511029
max 533357
Average: 372425.7
494349
max 533357
Average: 372425.7
SPECviewperf 12 test score — Solidworks
77
max 202
Average: 62.
4
max 202
Average: 62.4
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 sw-03
77
max 202
Average: 64
max 202
Average: 64
SPECviewperf 12 test evaluation — Siemens NX
12
max 212
Average: 14
max 212
Average: 14
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 showcase-01
175
max 232
Average: 121.3
max 232
Average: 121.3
SPECviewperf 12 test score — Showcase
175
max 175
Average: 108.
4
max 175
Average: 108.4
SPECviewperf 12 test score — Medical
fifty
max 107
Average: 39.6
max 107
Average: 39.6
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 mediacal-01
fifty
max 107
Average: 39
max 107
Average: 39
SPECviewperf 12 test score — Maya
177
max 177
Average: 129.eight
max 177
Average: 129.8
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 maya-04
177
max 180
Average: 132.
8
max 180
Average: 132.8
SPECviewperf 12 — Energy score
16
max 25
Average: 9.7
max 25
Average: 9.7
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 energy-01
16
max 21
Average: 10.7
max 21
Average: 10.7
SPECviewperf 12 test score — Creo
62
max 153
Average: 49.5
max 153
Average: 49.5
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 creo-01
62
max 153
Average: 52.
5
max 153
Average: 52.5
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 catia-04
119
max 189
Average: 91.5
max 189
Average: 91.5
SPECviewperf 12 test score — Catia
119
max 189
Average: 88.6
max 189
Average: 88.6
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 3dsmax-05
267
max 316
Average: 189.5
max 316
Average: 189.5
SPECviewperf 12 test score — 3ds Max
267
max 269
Average: 169.
8
max 269
Average: 169.8
Rumor: Radeon RX 6000 performance on RDNA 2 is comparable to RTX 2080 Ti
Unconfirmed benchmarks of the new AMD Radeon RX 6000 graphics generation based on the RDNA 2 architecture have appeared online. The tests were done in Ashes of The Singularity, so the big picture it is impossible to compose from them, even if they are real.
nine0002 It is impossible to say what kind of video card model is in the benchmark — it can be either Big Navi or something more affordable. The official names of the RX 6000 will not be known until October 28, when AMD will hold its presentation.
An unknown graphics card scored between 5900 and 6200 points in 4K resolution with insane graphics settings. Performance was measured in DirectX 11 on the Core i9-9900K, and the frequency was around 60 fps.
In terms of performance, the alleged RX 6000 is only 20% faster than the heavily overclocked RX 5700 XT.
It can be compared with NVIDIA RTX 2080 Ti, which received 6100 points without overclocking. The overclocked version reaches 79fps and 7800 points, making it 25% faster than the RX 6000.
RX 6000 performance in comparison:
- MSI Gaming X Trio 2080 Ti 74.4 (156.63%)
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti water cooled 71.4 (150.31%)
- EVGA XC Black 2080 Ti stock 64.9 (136.63%)
- AMD Radeon(TM) Graphics 63.9(134.52%)
- MSI Gaming X Trio 2080 stock 54.4 (114.52%)
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 stock 47.5 (100%)
In the case of the RTX 3080, the gap between NVIDIA’s new flagship and the alleged AMD card is truly huge. According to a leaked independent test, the RTX 3080 hits 98 fps in Ashes of The Singularity, making it 25% faster than the 2080 Ti and 55% faster than the RX 6000.
AMD is rumored to introduce graphics cards based on the Navi 21 and Navi 22. There are reports that the Navi 21 will compete with the RTX 3080 in terms of price and power, and the Navi 22 will challenge the RTX 3070. So in the test, the model with Navi 22.
If in the case of NVIDIA everything was pretty clear with the new generation back in May, when they introduced professional Ampere solutions with a significant increase in power and a very favorable price. We don’t really know what to expect from AMD. It is expected that the performance per watt of RDNA 2 will increase by 50% compared to the previous generation, but how this will be reflected in games and with regard to ray tracing is not clear.
Now AMD is in an interesting position where the company has the opportunity to really shake up the market with really competitive graphics, even if NVIDIA impressed the RTX 30. If the graphics presentation on RDNA 2 is weak, then the RX 6000 will remain the lot of AMD enthusiasts and lovers.