AMD RX 590 vs Nvidia RTX 2060
- CPU
- GPU
- SSD
- HDD
- RAM
- USB
VS
YouTube*NEW*
About
▲
785,598
▼
BUY • $200
Release date: Q4 2018.
Watch Gameplay
CSGO Dust 2 1080p Max |
245 EFps | 270 EFps | Better CSGO EFps. +10% |
|||
GTAV Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max |
96 EFps | Much Better GTAV EFps. +50% |
64 EFps | |||
Overwatch Temple of Anubis 1080p Max |
119 EFps | Much Better Overwatch EFps. +40% |
85 EFps | |||
PUBG M249 Training 1080p Max |
117 EFps | Much Better PUBG EFps. +48% |
79 EFps | |||
Fortnite UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max |
131 EFps | Much Better Fortnite EFps. +42% |
92 EFps |
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 773,205 user samples
Benchmark your GPU here
653,453 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 95% MSI(1462 3755)
Worst Bench: 81% Asus(1043 86F0) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 81%
Great: 95%
SPEED RANK: 59th / 688
119,752 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 65% MSI(1462 C411)
Worst Bench: 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E366)
Poor: 52%
Great: 65%
SPEED RANK: 90th / 688
Effective 3D Speed Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed |
88. 6 % | Much faster effective speed. +48% |
60 % |
Lighting Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) |
114 fps | Much better lighting effects. +60% |
71.1 fps | |||
Reflection Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) |
118 fps | Much better reflection handling. +72% |
68.5 fps | |||
MRender Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) |
133 fps | Hugely faster multi rendering. +95% |
68.2 fps | |||
Gravity Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) |
99. 9 fps | Faster NBody calculation. +25% |
80.1 fps |
Lighting Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) |
123 fps | Much better peak lighting effects. +57% |
78.1 fps | |||
Reflection High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) |
167 fps | Hugely better peak reflection handling. +136% |
70.9 fps | |||
MRender Render target array GShader (Sphere) |
142 fps | Hugely faster peak multi rendering. +98% |
71.7 fps | |||
Gravity NBody particle system (Galaxy) |
107 fps | Faster peak NBody calculation. +22% |
87.7 fps |
Market Share
Based on 56,078,810 GPUs tested.
See market share leaders
Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days) |
2.17 % | Insanely higher market share. +1,176% |
0.17 % | |||
Value Value For Money |
80.2 % | Better value. +13% |
71.1 % | |||
User Rating UBM User Rating |
88 % | More popular. +13% |
78 % | |||
Price Price (score) |
$262 | $200 | Cheaper. +24% |
Age Newest |
45 Months | +4% | 47 Months | |||
Parallax Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) |
124 fps | Better peak texture detail. +12% |
111 fps | |||
Splatting Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) |
98.5 fps | Hugely faster peak complex splatting. +82% |
54.1 fps | |||
Parallax Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) |
110 fps | Better texture detail. +11% |
99.2 fps | |||
Splatting Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) |
90.2 fps | Much faster complex splatting. +72% |
52.5 fps |
ADVERTISEMENT
The 6GB RTX 2060 is the latest addition to Nvidia’s RTX series of graphics card which are based on their Turing architecture. Turing features AI enhanced graphics and real time ray tracing which is intended to eventually deliver a more realistic gaming experience. The 2060 has 1920 CUDA cores and 336GB/s of GDRR6 memory bandwidth. With a launch price of $350 for the Founders Edition, the 2060 offered the best value for money amongst the RTX range and somewhat redeemed Nvidia from their earlier RTX releases (2070, 2080, 2080 Ti) which were unrealistically priced. The RTX 2060 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. The 2060 is capable of delivering 100+ EFps in almost all of today’s popular games at 1080p with maximum details. This should more than satisfy the majority of 1080p gamers including those who play at 144Hz. Rapidly diminishing returns lie beyond the 2060’s price point of $325 and they are not worth it for the majority of gamers that play at or below 1080p. For gamers that play at 1440p the next step up would be to the $400 2060S. [Nov ’19 GPUPro]
MORE DETAILS
AMD’s mid-range RX 590 is the latest refresh of their Polaris-based RX 580, which in turn was a refresh of the RX 480. This iteration yields 10% higher clock speeds compared to the RX 580 which is fuelled by an increased power draw from 185W to 225W. The 590 does not have a 4GB variant which is good for longevity. At launch the 590 was priced at $280, which was 20% more expensive and 7% faster than Nvidia’s then popular 6GB 1060. In today’s market the 590 can be found for little as $170. For more than 90% of gamers (≤1080p) the RX 590 (at $170) represents the best value for money available. Since the GPU is by far the most important component in a gaming PC, it is usually worth spending more on it. The next step up from a 590 would be to Nvidia’s comparable $230 1660S. The 1660S is a more refined card, less heat results in less fan noise, but both are capable of delivering silky smooth 60+ EFps in almost all of today’s popular games at 1080p with maximum details. [Nov ’19 GPUPro]
MORE DETAILS
Systems with these GPUs
Top Builds that include these GPUs
- Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING (8,338)
- MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) (6,111)
- MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) (4,547)
- Gigabyte B450M DS3H (4,367)
- Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE (3,938)
- Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (3,713)
- Asus PRIME B450M-A (3,365)
- Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING (1,628)
- Gigabyte B450M DS3H (1,581)
- MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) (1,205)
- Gigabyte GA-B450M S2H (1,147)
- Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE (1,129)
- Asrock B450M Pro4 (811)
- Asus PRIME B450M-A (783)
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.
CHOOSE A COMPONENT:
CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance)
November 2022 GPU Rankings.
We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]
ADVERTISEMENT
Group Test Results
- Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
- Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.
- Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.
Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.
UserBenchmark of the month
Gaming
Desktop
ProGaming
CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB
How it works
- — Download and run UserBenchmark.
- — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
- — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
- — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- — See speed test results from other users.
- — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Frequently Asked Questions
Best User Rated
-
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti
-
Nvidia RTX 3070
-
Nvidia RTX 3050
-
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)
-
Nvidia RTX 3080
-
Nvidia RTX 4090
-
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)
-
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB
-
Nvidia RTX 2060
-
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)
-
AMD RX 6600-XT
-
AMD RX 5600-XT
About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube
Feedback
AMD Radeon RX 590 GME vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 12GB
|
|
|
AMD Radeon RX 590 GME vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 12GB
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon RX 590 GME on one side and Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 12GB on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 2304 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,4 GHz, its lithography is 14 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 2176 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,7 GHz, its lithography is 12 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in various benchmarks.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
Graphics card | AMD Radeon RX 590 GME | Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 12GB | ||||||
Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
Release date | Q1 2020 | Q4 2021 | ||||||
Model number | 215-0910066, Polaris 20 XTR | TU106-200A-KA-A1 | ||||||
GPU name | Polaris 20 | TU106 | ||||||
Architecture | GCN 4. 0 | Turing | ||||||
Generation | Polaris RX 500 | GeForce 20 | ||||||
Lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm | ||||||
Transistors | 5.700.000.000 | 10.800.000.000 | ||||||
Bus interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 | ||||||
GPU base clock | 1,26 GHz | 1,47 GHz | ||||||
GPU boost clock | 1,38 GHz | 1,65 GHz | ||||||
Memory frequency | 2.000 MHz | 1.750 MHz | ||||||
Effective memory speed | 8 GB/s | 14 GB/s | ||||||
Memory size | 8 GB | 12 GB | ||||||
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 | ||||||
Memory bus | 256 Bit | 192 Bit | ||||||
Memory bandwidth | 256,0 GB/s | 336,0 GB/s | ||||||
TDP | 175 W | 184 W | ||||||
Suggested PSU | 450W ATX Power Supply | 500W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
Multicard technology | — | — | ||||||
Outputs |
1x HDMI |
1x DVI |
||||||
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) | 36 | 34 | ||||||
Shading units (cuda cores) | 2. 304 | 2.176 | ||||||
TMUs | 144 | 136 | ||||||
ROPs | 32 | 48 | ||||||
Cache memory | 2 MB | 3 MB | ||||||
Pixel fillrate | 44,2 GP/s | 79,2 GP/s | ||||||
Texture fillrate | 198,7 GT/s | 224,4 GT/s | ||||||
Performance FP16 (half) | 6,4 TFLOPS | 14,4 TFLOPS | ||||||
Performance FP32 (float) | 6,4 TFLOPS | 7,2 TFLOPS | ||||||
Performance FP64 (double) | 397,4 GFLOPS | 224,4 GFLOPS | ||||||
Amazon | ||||||||
eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
FP32 Performance in GFLOPS | |
---|---|
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 12GB |
7.181 |
AMD Radeon RX 590 GME |
6.359 |
The difference is 13%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.
Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.
Equivalence:
AMD Radeon RX 590 GME Nvidia equivalentNvidia GeForce RTX 2060 12GB AMD equivalent
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website.