Ryzen 3 1200 vs 2200g: Please click the green button to continue.

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G vs Ryzen 3 1200: performance comparison

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

AMD Ryzen 3 1200

We compared two 4-core desktop CPUs: the 3.5 GHz AMD Ryzen 3 2200G against the 3.1 GHz Ryzen 3 1200. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review
Differences
Performance
Specs
Comments

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors

Single-Core Performance

Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks

Ryzen 3 2200G

Ryzen 3 1200

Multi-Core Performance

Measure performance when all cores are involved

Ryzen 3 2200G

Ryzen 3 1200

Power Efficiency

The efficiency score of electricity consumption

Ryzen 3 2200G

Ryzen 3 1200

NanoReview Final Score

Generic CPU rating

Ryzen 3 2200G

Ryzen 3 1200

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 1200 and 2200G

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

Newer — released 7-months later
Includes an integrated GPU Radeon Vega 8
9% higher Turbo Boost frequency (3. 7 GHz vs 3.4 GHz)
Around 3.97 GB/s (10%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200

Has 4096 KB larger L3 cache size

Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Ryzen 3 2200G
+13%

938

Ryzen 3 1200

829

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Ryzen 3 2200G
+19%

3570

Ryzen 3 1200

3000

Passmark CPU (Single-Core)

Ryzen 3 2200G
+7%

2058

Ryzen 3 1200

1932

Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)

Ryzen 3 2200G
+7%

6741

Ryzen 3 1200

6296

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)

Ryzen 3 2200G

901

Ryzen 3 1200
+2%

921

Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)

Ryzen 3 2200G
+1%

3071

Ryzen 3 1200

3045

Submit your Cinebench R23 result

Specifications

Full technical specification of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen 3 1200

General

Vendor	AMD	AMD
Released	February 12, 2018	July 27, 2017
Type	Desktop	Desktop
instruction set	x86-64	x86-64
Codename	Zen (Raven Ridge)	—
Integrated GPU	Radeon Vega 8	No

Performance Cores
P-Cores	4	4
P-Threads	4	4
Base Frequency (P)	3. 5 GHz	3.1 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P)	3.7 GHz	3.4 GHz

Total
Total Cores	4	4
Total Threads	4	4
Bus Frequency	100 MHz	100 MHz
Multiplier	35x	31x
L1 Cache	128K (per core)	96K (per core)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512K (per core)
L3 Cache	4MB (shared)	8MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier	Yes	Yes

Package

Transistors	4. 9 billions	4.8 billions
Fabrication process	14 nm	14 nm
TDP (PL1)	65 W	65 W
Socket	AM4	AM4
Peak temperature	95°C	95°C

Integrated Graphics	Radeon Vega 8	—
GPU Base Clock	300 MHz	—
GPU Boost Clock	1100 MHz	—
Shading Units	512	—
TMUs	32	—
ROPs	8	—
Execution Units	8	—
TGP	65 W	—
Max. Resolution	3840×2160 — 60 Hz	—

iGPU FLOPS

Ryzen 3 2200G

1.13 TFLOPS

Ryzen 3 1200

n/a

Memory Support

Memory types	— DDR4-2933	— DDR4-2666
Memory Size	64 GB	64 GB
Max. Memory Channels	2	2
Max. Memory Bandwidth	43.71 GB/s	39.74 GB/s
ECC Support	Yes	Yes

Official site	AMD Ryzen 3 2200G official page	AMD Ryzen 3 1200 official page
PCI Express Version	3.0	3.0
PCI Express Lanes	12	20

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors

Ryzen 3 2200G

14 (60. 9%)

Ryzen 3 1200

9 (39.1%)

Total votes: 23

So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen 3 1200 or Ryzen 3 2200G?

Name

Message

Promotion

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G vs AMD Ryzen 3 1200 AF Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G vs AMD Ryzen 3 1200 AF

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 3 2200G on one side and the AMD Ryzen 3 1200 AF on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,7GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench and Cinebench.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specification comparison:

Processor	AMD Ryzen 3 2200G	AMD Ryzen 3 1200 AF
Market (main)	Desktop	Desktop
ISA	x86-64 (64 bit)	x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture	Zen	Zen+
Core name	Raven Ridge	Pinnacle Ridge
Family	Ryzen 3 2000	Ryzen 3 1000
Part number(s), S-Spec	YD2200C5M4MFB, YD2200C5FBBOX	YD1200BBAFBOX
Release date	Q1 2018	Q2 2020
Lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Transistors	4. 950.000.000	4.800.000.000
Cores	4	4
Threads	4	4
Base frequency	3,5 GHz	3,1 GHz
Turbo frequency	3,7 GHz	3,4 GHz
Cache memory	4 MB	8 MB
Max memory capacity	64 GB	64 GB
Memory types	DDR4-2933	DDR4-2667
Max # of memory channels	2	2
Max memory bandwidth	43,71 GB/s	42,7 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes	12	20
TDP	65 W	65 W
Suggested PSU	600W ATX Power Supply	600W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics	AMD Radeon Vega 8 (Raven)	None
GPU cores	8	—
GPU shading units	512	—
GPU base clock	300 MHz	—
GPU boost clock	1100 MHz	—
GPU FP32 floating point	1. 126 GFLOPS	—
Socket	AM4, PGA-1331	AM4, PGA-1331
Compatible motherboard	Socket AM4 Motherboard	Socket AM4 Motherboard
Maximum temperature	95°C	95°C
Crypto engine	Advanced Encryption Standard instructions	Advanced Encryption Standard instructions
Security	Enhanced Virus Protection, Supervisor Mode Access Prevention, Secure Mode Execution Protection	Enhanced Virus Protection, Supervisor Mode Access Prevention, Secure Mode Execution Protection
CPU-Z single thread	419	433
CPU-Z multi thread	1. 694	1.747
Cinebench R15 single thread	140	150
Cinebench R15 multi-thread	585	570
Cinebench R20 single thread	335	360
Cinebench R20 multi-thread	1.402	1.370
Cinebench R23 single thread	953	893
Cinebench R23 multi-thread	3.637	3.536
PassMark single thread	2.047	1.931
PassMark CPU Mark	6. 766	6.287
(Windows) Geekbench 4 single core	3.922	3.765
(Windows) Geekbench 4 multi-core	10.594	10.868
(Windows) Geekbench 5 single core	835	870
(Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core	2.855	2.813
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance	174,4 GFLOPS	73,7 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio	163 pts / W	167 pts / W
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G is greater, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The AMD Ryzen 3 1200 AF was started more recently.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.

	CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 AF	433 1.747
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G	419 1.694

In single core, the difference is 3%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 3%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.

	Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G	140 585
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 AF	150 570

In single core, the difference is -7%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 3%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.

	Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G	335 1.402
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 AF	360 1.370

In single core, the difference is -7%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 2%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.

	Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G	953 3.637
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 AF	893 3.536

In single core, the difference is 7%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 3%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.

	PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G	2.047 6.766
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 AF	1.931 6.287

In single core, the difference is 6%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 8%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 AF	3.765 10.868
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G	3.922 10.594

In single core, the difference is 4%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 3%.

On Linux:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 AF	3. 600 10.870
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G	4.151 9.301

In single core, the difference is 15%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 17%.

On Android:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 AF	3.620 9.420
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G	3.451 7.420

In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 27%.

On Mac OS X:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G	4.211 12.142
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 AF	3. 843 11.047

In single core, the difference is 10%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 10%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

On Windows:

	Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G	835 2. 855
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 AF	870 2.813

In single core, the difference is -4%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 1%.

On Linux:

	Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G	1.051 3.584
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 AF	960 3.124

In single core, the difference is 9%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 15%.

On macOS:

	Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — macOS
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G	909 3.190
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 AF	861 2.860

In single core, the difference is 6%.