Ryzen 3 2200g vs 8100: AMD Ryzen 3 2200G vs Intel Core i3-8100

Group Test Results

• Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
• Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.
• Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB

How it works

• — Download and run UserBenchmark.
• — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
• — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
• — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
• — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
• — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
• — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark. com.
• — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
• — See speed test results from other users.
• — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
• — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
• — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

•   

  Intel Core i5-13600K

•   

  Intel Core i5-12400F

•   

  Intel Core i7-12700K

•   

  Intel Core i5-12600K

•   

  Intel Core i5-12400

•   

  Intel Core i9-13900K

•   

  AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

•   

  Intel Core i3-12100F

•   

  AMD Ryzen 5 3600

•   

  Intel Core i7-11700K

•   

  Intel Core i3-12100

•   

  Intel Core i5-11400F

About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube
Feedback

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G vs Intel Core i3-8100

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G vs Intel Core i3-8100

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 3 2200G on one side and the Intel Core i3-8100 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,7GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,6 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specifications:

Processor		AMD Ryzen 3 2200G				Intel Core i3-8100
Market (main)		Desktop				Desktop
ISA		x86-64 (64 bit)				x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture		Zen				Coffee Lake
Core name		Raven Ridge				Coffee Lake-S
Family		Ryzen 3 2000				Core i3-8000
Part number(s), S-Spec		YD2200C5M4MFB, YD2200C5FBBOX				BX80684I38100, BXC80684I38100, CM8068403377308, SR3N5
Release date		Q1 2018				Q4 2017
Lithography		14 nm				14 nm++
Transistors		4. 950.000.000				—
Cores		4				4
Threads		4				4
Base frequency		3,5 GHz				3,6 GHz
Turbo frequency		3,7 GHz				—
Cache memory		4 MB				6 MB
Max memory capacity		64 GB				64 GB
Memory types		DDR4-2933				DDR4-2400
Max # of memory channels		2				2
Max memory bandwidth		43,71 GB/s				37,5 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes		12				16
TDP		65 W				65 W
Suggested PSU		600W ATX Power Supply				600W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics		AMD Radeon Vega 8 (Raven)				Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Coffee Lake)
GPU cores		8				—
GPU execution units		—				23
GPU shading units		512				184
GPU base clock		300 MHz				350 MHz
GPU boost clock		1100 MHz				1100 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point		1. 126 GFLOPS				423,2 GFLOPS
Socket		AM4, PGA-1331				LGA1151
Compatible motherboard		Socket AM4 Motherboard				Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard
Maximum temperature		95°C				100°C
Crypto engine		Advanced Encryption Standard instructions				—
Security		Enhanced Virus Protection, Supervisor Mode Access Prevention, Secure Mode Execution Protection				—
CPU-Z single thread		419				422
CPU-Z multi thread		1. 694				1.654
Cinebench R15 single thread		140				154
Cinebench R15 multi-thread		585				616
Cinebench R20 single thread		335				363
Cinebench R20 multi-thread		1.402				1.408
Cinebench R23 single thread		953				707
Cinebench R23 multi-thread		3.637				2.745
PassMark single thread		2.047				2.231
PassMark CPU Mark		6. 766				6.120
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core		3.922				4.327
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core		10.594				12.377
(Windows) Geekbench 5 single core		835				962
(Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core		2.855				3.031
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance		174,4 GFLOPS				225,6 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio		163 pts / W				190 pts / W
Amazon
eBay

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G is greater, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The AMD Ryzen 3 2200G was designed earlier.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

In single core, the difference is -1%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 2%.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.

In single core, the difference is 10%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 5%.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.

In single core, the difference is 8%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 0%.

Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.

In single core, the difference is 35%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 32%.

Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.

	PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G	2.047 6.766
Intel Core i3-8100	2.231 6. 120

In single core, the difference is -8%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 11%.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows 64-bit:

In single core, the difference is 10%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 17%.

On Linux 64-bit:

In single core, the difference is 12%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 30%.

On Android 64-bit:

In single core, the difference is 10%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 5%.

On Mac OS X 64-bit:

In single core, the difference is 6%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 8%.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

On Windows:

In single core, the difference is 15%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 6%.

On Linux:

In single core, the difference is 2%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 10%.

On Android:

In single core, the difference is 27%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 15%.

On macOS:

In single core, the difference is 3%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 1%.