AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs 7 2700
| 05 Nov20|Techpowerup AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Review |
10 % | FarC5 17%, BFV 18%, SotTR 4%, Rage2 3%, Witcher3 4%, Civ6 10%, ACO 3%, MetroEx 12%, Sekiro 19%, Wolf2 13% | ||||
| 28 May20|Techpowerup Intel Core i5-10400F Review — Six … |
10 % | FarC5 17%, BFV 18%, SotTR 4%, Rage2 3%, Witcher3 4%, Civ6 10%, ACO 1%, MetroEx 12%, Sekiro 19%, Wolf2 13% | ||||
| 22 Nov22|Gamers Nexus Intel i7-13700K CPU Review & Bench… |
21 % | FarC6 25%, FinFant14 13%, GTAV 18%, SotTR 16%, CSGO 43%, R6S 23%, TWarW3 12% | ||||
| 14 Nov19|PCGamer AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review |
StrangeB 1% | 12 % | Hitm2 22%, FarC5 15%, TWarW2 21%, SotTR 18%, ACO 8%, MetroEx 14%, MESoW 8%, Divis2 8% |
| Memory Avg. |
75.7 Pts | 76.3 Pts | +1% | |||
| 1-Core Avg. Single Core Speed |
103 Pts | 133 Pts | Faster single-core speed. +29% |
|||
| 2-Core Avg. Dual Core Speed |
202 Pts | 259 Pts | Faster dual-core speed. +28% |
|||
| 4-Core Avg. Quad Core Speed |
387 Pts | 483 Pts | Faster quad-core speed. +25% |
|||
| 8-Core Avg. Octa Core Speed |
667 Pts | 792 Pts | Faster octa-core speed. +19% |
| Memory OC Memory Latency |
83. 7 Pts |
87.5 Pts | +5% | |||
| 1-Core OC Single Core Speed |
118 Pts | 141 Pts | Faster OC single-core speed. +19% |
|||
| 2-Core OC Dual Core Speed |
236 Pts | 281 Pts | Faster OC dual-core speed. +19% |
|||
| 4-Core OC Quad Core Speed |
453 Pts | 546 Pts | Faster OC quad-core speed. +21% |
|||
| 8-Core OC Octa Core Speed |
823 Pts | 869 Pts | Slightly faster OC octa-core speed. +6% |
| Age Newest |
55 Months | 40 Months | More recent. +27% |
|||
| TDP Thermal Design Power (TDP) |
65 Watts | 65 Watts | ||||
| Cores CPU Processing Cores |
8 cores | Much higher core count. +33% |
6 cores | |||
| Threads CPU Processing Threads |
16 threads | Much higher thread count. +33% |
12 threads | |||
| Lithography Manufacturing process |
12 nm | 7 nm | Much newer manufacturing. +42% |
|||
| Base Clock Base Clock Speed |
3.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz | Faster base frequency. +12% |
|||
| Turbo Clock Turbo Clock Speed |
4. 1 GHz |
4.2 GHz | +2% | |||
| 64-Core OC Multi Core Speed |
1176 Pts | Slightly faster OC 64-core speed. +8% |
1091 Pts | |||
| 64-Core Avg. Multi Core Speed |
1017 Pts | +2% | 999 Pts |
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 7 2700 — Red Dead Redemption 2 with GTX 1660 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison
GTX 1660 with
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Red Dead Redemption 2
GTX 1660 with
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 7 2700
Multi-Thread Performance
19634 Pts
15033 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2900 Pts
2011 Pts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 7 2700 in Red Dead Redemption 2 using GTX 1660 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions
Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 7 2700
Ultra Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
42. |
| 1080p |
36.0 FPS |
| 1440p |
34.3 FPS |
| 1440p |
29.4 FPS |
| 2160p |
21.8 FPS |
| 2160p |
18.7 FPS |
| w1440p |
30.0 FPS |
| w1440p |
25.7 FPS |
0 FPSHigh Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
75.3 FPS |
| 1080p |
65.9 FPS |
| 1440p |
63.2 FPS |
| 1440p |
55.3 FPS |
| 2160p |
42.7 FPS |
| 2160p |
37.3 FPS |
| w1440p |
56.3 FPS |
| w1440p |
49.2 FPS |
Medium Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
108. |
| 1080p |
95.8 FPS |
| 1440p |
92.1 FPS |
| 1440p |
81.2 FPS |
| 2160p |
63.5 FPS |
| 2160p |
55.9 FPS |
| w1440p |
82.6 FPS |
| w1440p |
72.7 FPS |
6 FPSLow Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
175.1 FPS |
| 1080p |
155.7 FPS |
| 1440p |
150.0 FPS |
| 1440p |
133.1 FPS |
| 2160p |
105.2 FPS |
| 2160p |
93.1 FPS |
| w1440p |
135.2 FPS |
| w1440p |
119.8 FPS |
Ryzen 5 3600
- The Ryzen 5 3600 has higher Level 3 Cache.
This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads. - For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU’s with higher core count and lower core speed.
- The Ryzen 5 3600 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
- The Ryzen 5 3600 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Ryzen 7 2700
- The Ryzen 7 2700 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
- The Ryzen 7 2700 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
Compare Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 7 2700 specifications
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 7 2700 Architecture
| Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 2700 | |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Zen 2 | Zen |
| Generation | Ryzen 5 (Zen 2) |
Ryzen 7 (Zen+ (Pinnacle Ridge)) |
| Market | Desktop | Desktop |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Part# | unknown | YD2700BBM88AF |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Released | Jul 2019 | Apr 2018 |
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 7 2700 Cache
| Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 2700 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cache L1 | 96K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| Cache L2 | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Cache L3 | 32MB (shared) | 16MB (shared) |
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 7 2700 Cores
| Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 2700 | |
|---|---|---|
| # of Cores | 6 | 8 |
| # of Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Integrated Graphics | N/A | N/A |
| SMP # CPUs | 1 | 1 |
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 7 2700 Performance
| Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 2700 | |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Frequency | 3. 6 GHz |
3.2 GHz |
| Multiplier | 36.0x | 32.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| TDP | 65 W | 65 W |
| Turbo Clock | up to 4.2 GHz | up to 4.1 GHz |
| Voltage | variable | variable |
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 7 2700 Physical
| Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 2700 | |
|---|---|---|
| Die Size | unknown | 192 mm² |
| Foundry | TSMC | GlobalFoundries |
| Package | µOPGA-1331 | |
| Process Size | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Transistors | 4,800 million | 4800 million |
| tCaseMax | unknown | unknown |
Share Your Comments 0
Compare Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 7 2700 in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
0007
Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 7 2700
Ultra Quality
| Resolution | Frames per second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
83. |
| 1080p |
71.3 FPS |
| 1440p |
66.4 FPS |
| 1440p |
56.9 FPS |
| 2160p |
35.7 FPS |
| 2160p |
30.6 FPS |
| w1440p |
54.6 FPS |
| w1440p |
46.8 FPS |
3 FPS High quality
| Resolution | Frames per second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
135.1 FPS |
| 1080p |
118.4 FPS |
| 1440p |
111.4 FPS |
| 1440p |
97.7 FPS |
| 2160p |
65.4 FPS |
| 2160p |
57.3 FPS |
| w1440p |
94.3 FPS |
| w1440p |
82. |
6 FPS Medium quality
| Resolution | Frames per second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
186.8 FPS |
| 1080p |
165.4 FPS |
| 1440p |
156.4 FPS |
| 1440p |
138.5 FPS |
| 2160p |
95.2 FPS |
| 2160p |
83.9 FPS |
| w1440p |
134.0 FPS |
| w1440p |
118.4 FPS |
Low quality
| Resolution | Frames per second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
290.3 FPS |
| 1080p |
259.6 FPS |
| 1440p |
246.5 FPS |
| 1440p |
220. |
| 2160p |
154.7 FPS |
| 2160p |
137.3 FPS |
| w1440p |
213.4 FPS |
| w1440p |
190.1 FPS |
0 FPS Ryzen 5 3600
- Ryzen 5 3600 has higher L3 cache. This is useful when you have significant multi-processor workloads, many computational processes at the same time. Rather on a server rather than a personal computer for interactive workloads.
- In some games, a processor with a higher clock speed, or with the technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), performs better than other processors with more cores and a lower core frequency.
- The Ryzen 5 3600 has a higher turbo clock. Turbo Boost is a processor feature that will run at a processor clock speed faster than its base clock speed if certain conditions are present. This will allow older software that runs on fewer cores to run better on newer hardware.
Since games are also software, they are also applicable. - Ryzen 5 3600 The Ryzen 5 3600 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can turn on and off, the faster it can work. And transistors that turn on and off with less power are more efficient, reducing the operating power or «dynamic power» required by the processor.
Ryzen 7 2700
- Ryzen 7 2700 has more cores. The advantage of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can process a separate data stream. This architecture greatly improves the performance of a system running parallel applications.
- Ryzen 7 2700 has more themes. Large programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to speed up execution.
Compare Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 7 2700 specifications
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 7 2700 Architecture
| Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 2700 | |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Zen 2 | Zen |
| Generation | Ryzen 5 (Zen 2) |
Ryzen 7 (Zen+ (Pinnacle Ridge)) |
| Market | Desktop | Desktop |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Part# | unknown | YD2700BBM88AF |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Released | Jul 2019 | Apr 2018 |
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 7 2700 Cache
| Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 2700 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cache L1 | 96K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| Cache L2 | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Cache L3 | 32MB (shared) | 16MB (shared) |
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 7 2700 Cores
| Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 2700 | |
|---|---|---|
| # of Cores | 6 | 8 |
| # of Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Integrated Graphics | N/A | N/A |
| SMP# CPUs | 1 | 1 |
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 7 2700 Performance
| Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 2700 | |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Frequency | 3. 6 GHz |
3.2 GHz |
| Multiplier | 36.0x | 32.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| TDP | 65W | 65W |
| Turbo Clock | up to 4.2 GHz | up to 4.1 GHz |
| Voltage | variable | variable |
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 7 2700 Physical
| Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 2700 | |
|---|---|---|
| Die Size | unknown | 192 mm² |
| Foundry | TSMC | GlobalFoundries |
| Package | µOPGA-1331 | |
| Process Size | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Transistors | 4,800 million | 4800 million |
| tCaseMax | unknown | unknown |
Share your comments 0
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need for Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 Processor Review
Skip to content
- Description
Description
Specifications
| Release year | 2019 |
| Segment | for desktop computers |
| Socket | Socket AM4 |
| Number of cores | 6 |
| Number of threads | 12 |
| Base frequency | 3600MHz |
| Turbo Core | 4200MHz |
| Cache L1/L2/L3 | 384Kb/3Mb/32Mb |
| Unlocked multiplier | yes |
| Architecture (core) | Zen2 |
| Process | 7nm |
| Integrated video core | no |
Max. memory frequency |
DDR4 3200 |
| TDP | 65W |
| Max. temperature | 95C |
The difference between the PRO version of the processor and the standard one is the presence of AMD Secure security technology, support for Windows 10 security tools, Windows Server, hardware 128-bit data encryption and other means of protection against unauthorized access to the PC. In all other respects, the Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 and Ryzen 5 3600 are identical.
Ever since the Zen1 architecture released in 2017 and built on it a really popular and productive 6-core Ryzen 5 1600, Advanced Micro Devices has begun to actively recapture the processor market of medium and mid-budget price positions. And the Core i5 competitor (and its successor, the Ryzen 5 2600) really has a lot to offer: 6 cores, 12 threads, comparable clock speeds and overclocking capability, and significantly more affordable prices than Intel, all this more than compensates for a few percent.
losing in game tests.
With the advent of the Ryzen 5 3600, everything has changed. AMD has done a really titanic job of transferring the Zen core to 7nm «rails» (technological process), also significantly improving it, improving the instruction sets and increasing the number of operations per clock. The resulting Zen2 core opened a new page in the history of processor building and performance, and perhaps it was the Ryzen 5 3600 that led it. Why him? The answer is simple, 3600 is the youngest, which means the most budget processor in the series, which has an excellent price / performance ratio. So great that AMD had to drastically cut prices on all previous models. And even the 8-core 16-thread Ryzen 7 2700 began to cost less than the Ryzen 5 3600 ($180 versus $200) because the latter, despite the smaller number of cores, beats the competitor in all tests due to the new technology. But not only 2700 wins a newcomer. In gaming tests (which have always been a strong point of Intel processors), it, albeit slightly, wins even its direct price competitor Core i5 9400F.