Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 5 1600 — Minecraft with RX 570 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison
RX 570 with
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Minecraft
RX 570 with
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Ryzen 5 2600
Ryzen 5 1600
Multi-Thread Performance
13503 Pts
12265 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2008 Pts
1821 Pts
Minecraft
Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 5 1600 in Minecraft using RX 570 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions
Ryzen 5 2600
Ryzen 5 1600
Ultra Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
418.
|
1080p |
393.4 FPS
|
1440p |
193.2 FPS
|
1440p |
181.6 FPS
|
2160p |
96.6 FPS
|
2160p |
90.8 FPS
|
w1440p |
155.1 FPS
|
w1440p |
145.7 FPS
|
High Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
509.8 FPS
|
1080p |
485.
|
1440p |
272.6 FPS
|
1440p |
259.1 FPS
|
2160p |
153.0 FPS
|
2160p |
145.3 FPS
|
w1440p |
227.4 FPS
|
w1440p |
215.9 FPS
|
Medium Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
601.0 FPS
|
1080p |
576.9 FPS
|
1440p |
352.
|
1440p |
336.5 FPS
|
2160p |
209.5 FPS
|
2160p |
199.7 FPS
|
w1440p |
299.6 FPS
|
w1440p |
286.0 FPS
|
Low Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
783.2 FPS
|
1080p |
760.4 FPS
|
1440p |
510.8 FPS
|
1440p |
491.
|
2160p |
322.4 FPS
|
2160p |
308.6 FPS
|
w1440p |
444.2 FPS
|
w1440p |
426.3 FPS
|
Ryzen 5 2600
- For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU’s with higher core count and lower core speed.
- The Ryzen 5 2600 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
- The Ryzen 5 2600 has a smaller process size.
The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Ryzen 5 1600
Compare Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 5 1600 specifications
Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 5 1600 Architecture
Ryzen 5 2600 | Ryzen 5 1600 | |
---|---|---|
Codename | Zen | Zen |
Generation | Ryzen 5 (Zen+ (Pinnacle Ridge)) |
Ryzen 5 (Zen) |
Market | Desktop | Desktop |
Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Part# | YD2600BBM6IAF | YD1600BBM6IAEYD1600BBAEBOX |
Production Status | Active | Active |
Released | Apr 2018 | Apr 2017 |
Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 5 1600 Cache
Ryzen 5 2600 | Ryzen 5 1600 | |
---|---|---|
Cache L1 | 96K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
Cache L2 | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
Cache L3 | 16MB (shared) | 16MB (shared) |
Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 5 1600 Cores
Ryzen 5 2600 | Ryzen 5 1600 | |
---|---|---|
# of Cores | 6 | 6 |
# of Threads | 12 | 12 |
Integrated Graphics | N/A | N/A |
SMP # CPUs | 1 | 1 |
Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 5 1600 Features
Ryzen 5 2600 | Ryzen 5 1600 | |
---|---|---|
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4A SSE4. ![]() SSE4.2 AES AVX AVX2 BMI1 BMI2 SHA F16C FMA3 AMD64 EVP AMD-V SMAP SMEP SMT Precision Boost 2 |
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4A SSE4.1 SSE4.2 AES AVX AVX2 BMI1 BMI2 SHA F16C FMA3 AMD64 EVP AMD-V SMAP SMEP SMT Precision Boost |
Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 5 1600 Notes
Ryzen 5 2600 | Ryzen 5 1600 | |
---|---|---|
This processor comes with an unlocked base clock multiplier, allowing users to set the multiplier value higher than shipped value, to facilitate better overclocking. | This processor comes with an unlocked base clock multiplier, allowing users to set the multiplier value higher than shipped value, to facilitate better overclocking. |
Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 5 1600 Performance
Ryzen 5 2600 | Ryzen 5 1600 | |
---|---|---|
Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
Frequency | 3.![]() |
3.2 GHz |
Multiplier | 34.0x | 32.0x |
Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
TDP | 65 W | 65 W |
Turbo Clock | up to 3.9 GHz | up to 3.6 GHz |
Voltage | unknown | unknown |
Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 5 1600 Physical
Ryzen 5 2600 | Ryzen 5 1600 | |
---|---|---|
Die Size | 192 mm² | 192 mm² |
Foundry | GlobalFoundries | GlobalFoundries |
Package | µOPGA-1331 | µPGA |
Process Size | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | AMD Socket AM4 |
Transistors | 4800 million | 4800 million |
tCaseMax | unknown | unknown |
Share Your Comments 0
Compare Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 5 1600 in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity
2016
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Hitman
2016
Rise of the Tomb Raider
2016
The Division
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
DiRT Rally
2015
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
The Witcher 3
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Battlefield 4
2013
Crysis 3
2013
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 vs AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 vs AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 on one side and the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 6 cores, 12 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,6GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 12 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,9 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
Processor | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | ||||||
Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
Microarchitecture | Zen | Zen+ | ||||||
Core name | Summit Ridge | Pinnacle Ridge | ||||||
Family | Ryzen 5 1000 | Ryzen 5 2000 | ||||||
Part number(s), S-Spec |
YD1600BBAEBOX, |
YD2600BBM6IAF |
||||||
Release date | Q1 2017 | Q2 2018 | ||||||
Lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm | ||||||
Transistors | 4.![]() |
4.800.000.000 | ||||||
Cores | 6 | 6 | ||||||
Threads | 12 | 12 | ||||||
Base frequency | 3,2 GHz | 3,4 GHz | ||||||
Turbo frequency | 3,6 GHz | 3,9 GHz | ||||||
Cache memory | 16 MB | 16 MB | ||||||
Max memory capacity | 64 GB | 64 GB | ||||||
Memory types |
DDR4-2667 |
DDR4-2933 |
||||||
Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
Max memory bandwidth | 39,74 GB/s | 43,71 GB/s | ||||||
Max PCIe lanes | 20 | 20 | ||||||
TDP | 65 W | 65 W | ||||||
Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
GPU integrated graphics | None | None | ||||||
Socket | AM4, PGA-1331 | AM4, PGA-1331 | ||||||
Compatible motherboard | Socket AM4 Motherboard | Socket AM4 Motherboard | ||||||
Maximum temperature | 95°C | 95°C | ||||||
CPU-Z single thread | 403 | 438 | ||||||
CPU-Z multi thread | 3.![]() |
3.542 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 single thread | 145 | 161 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 1.147 | 1.384 | ||||||
Cinebench R23 single thread | 824 | 1.022 | ||||||
Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 6.476 | 8.126 | ||||||
PassMark single thread | 2.068 | 2.243 | ||||||
PassMark CPU Mark | 12.335 | 13.215 | ||||||
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
4.114 | 4.441 | ||||||
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
19.![]() |
20.954 | ||||||
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
247,7 GFLOPS | 267,1 GFLOPS | ||||||
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
293 pts / W | 322 pts / W | ||||||
Amazon | ||||||||
eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of AMD Ryzen 5 2600 is bigger, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 was started more recently.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
438 3.542 |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
403 3. ![]() |
In single core, the difference is 9%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 12%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
161 1.384 |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
145 1.147 |
In single core, the difference is 11%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 21%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
1.022 8.126 |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
824 6.476 |
In single core, the difference is 24%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 25%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
2.243 13.215 |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
2.068 12. ![]() |
In single core, the difference is 8%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 7%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
4.441 20.954 |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
4.114 19.013 |
In single core, the difference is 8%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 10%.
On Linux 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
4.570 20.707 |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
4.354 19.596 |
In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 6%.
On Android 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
4.361 13.960 |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
3.435 9.900 |
In single core, the difference is 27%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 41%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
4.216 19.258 |
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
4.213 19.017 |
In single core, the difference is 0%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 1%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 Intel equivalentAMD Ryzen 5 2600 Intel equivalent
See also:
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AFAMD Ryzen 5 1600X
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
3DNews Technologies and IT market. News processors The cheapest six-core processor has become even better… The most interesting in the reviews
12/18/2019 [00:16], Andrey Sozinov While AMD’s third generation Ryzen processors (3000 series) are already on the market, some first generation Ryzen processors (1000 series) are still quite popular. And the steady demand seems to have prompted AMD to take the rather odd step of selling more advanced processors from the Ryzen 2000 family under the guise of Ryzen 5 1600. The first thing that distinguishes the new Ryzen 5 1600 versions from the «original» ones is the complete cooling system. Previously, the Ryzen 5 1600 was equipped with Wraith Spire, while the new version is equipped with a simpler Wraith Stealth. Also, from external differences, you can pay attention to the model number: earlier it looked like YD1600BB AE BOX, and now it looks like YD1600BB A F BOX. In the first case, the marked letters indicate the B1 stepping, which is inherent in the Ryzen 1000 on the Zen architecture, while in the second case, the B2 stepping, which indicates the Ryzen 2000 chips with the Zen + architecture. The CPU-Z utility also confirms that the new versions of the Ryzen 5 1600 are built on chips with the B2 stepping, and also indicates that this processor is made according to the 12nm process technology and belongs to the Pinnacle Ridge family, while the «original» Ryzen The 5 1600 was manufactured to 14nm and belonged to Summit Ridge. Based on all this, it’s safe to say that AMD is now selling more advanced processors belonging to the next generation of Ryzen chips under the guise of Ryzen 5 1600. Undoubtedly, the end user only benefits from this AMD strategy — he gets a processor with better performance for the same money. Note that such processors have met before, but only occasionally, and now they have become publicly available. For example, you can buy an “improved” Ryzen 5 1600 on Amazon for $85.
Source:
If you notice an error, select it with the mouse and press CTRL+ENTER. Related materials Permanent URL: https://3dnews.ru/999945 Headings: Tags: ← |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 vs AMD Ryzen 5 2600 comparison
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
VS
WINNER
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Rating: 2 points
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Rating: 2 points
Test results
Technology
Performance
Memory specification
Interfaces and communications
Key features
Top specifications and features
- Heat dissipation (TDP)
- Technological process
- Number of transistors
- Geekbench score 5
- Number of Cores
Thermal Dissipation (TDP)
AMD Ryzen 5 1600: 65 W
AMD Ryzen 5 2600: 65 W
Process
AMD Ryzen 5 1600: 14 nm
AMD Ryzen 5 2600: 12 nm
Number of transistors
AMD Ryzen 5 1600: 4800 million
AMD Ryzen 5 2600: 4800 million
Geekbench 5 score
AMD Ryzen 5 1600: 877. 184
AMD Ryzen 5 2600: 936.054
Cores
AMD Ryzen 5 1600: 6
AMD Ryzen 5 2600: 6
Description
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 runs at 3.2Hz, second AMD Ryzen 5 2600 runs at 3.4Hz. AMD Ryzen 5 1600 is capable of overclocking up to 3.6 Hz, and the second up to 3.9 Hz. The maximum power consumption of the first processor is 65W, while the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 has 65W.
In terms of architecture, the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 is based on 14nm technology. AMD Ryzen 5 2600 on 12 nm architecture.
Regarding processor memory. AMD Ryzen 5 1600 can support DDR4. Maximum supported size N/A MB. It should be noted that the maximum memory bandwidth is 42.7. The second AMD Ryzen 5 2600 processor is capable of supporting DDR4. The throughput is 43.7. And the maximum amount of supported RAM is No data MB.
Graphics. The AMD Ryzen 5 1600 has a Discrete Graphics Card Required graphics core. The frequency of which is — No data MHz. AMD Ryzen 5 2600 received a Discrete Graphics Card Required video core. Here the frequency is No data MHz.
How processors perform in benchmarks. PassMark AMD Ryzen 5 1600 scored No data. And AMD Ryzen 5 2600 scored No data points.
Why AMD Ryzen 5 1600 is better than AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Comparison AMD RYZEN 5 1600 and AMD Ryzen 5 2600: the main points
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)