Ryzen 5 2600x vs ryzen 7 2700x: AMD Ryzen 5 2600X vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700X [cpubenchmark.net] by PassMark Software

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 5 2600X Reviewed — Next Gen Zen

Christopher Coke Posted: May 2, 2018 9:00 AM
Category: Hardware Reviews 0

The launch of Zen in 2017 shook the PC building world. After massive anticipation, AMD’s latest CPU platform redefined expectation for core count and performance per dollar, reigniting progress in a processing space that had begun to stagnate. This year, they hope to do the same with launch of the R5 2600X and R7 2700X. Did they succeed? We’re here with the answer in our official review. Read on to see just how Zen+ stacks up.

Specifications

Ryzen 7 2700X

MSRP: $329.99
# of CPU Cores: 8
# of Threads: 16
Base Clock: 3.7GHz
Max Boost Clock: 4.3GHz
Cache: Total L1: 768KB, Total L2: 4MB, Total L3: 16MB
Unlocked: Yes
CMOS: 12nm FinFET
Socket: AM4
System Memory Type: DDR4
Max System Memory Speed: 2933MHz
Memory Channels: 2
PCI Express Version: PCIe 3. 0 x16
PCI-e Lanes: 24
Thermal Solution: Included Wraith Prism with RGB LED
Default TDP / TDP: 105W
Max Temps: 85C
Supported Technologies: AMD StoreMI Technology, AMD SenseMI Technology, AMD Ryzen™ Master Utility

Ryzen 5 2600X

MSRP: $229.99
# of CPU Cores: 6
# of Threads: 12
Base Clock: 3.6GHz
Max Boost Clock: 4.2GHz
Cache: Total L1: 576KB, Total L2: 3MB, Total L3: 16MB
Unlocked: Yes
CMOS: 12nm FinFET
Socket: AM4
System Memory Type: DDR4
Max System Memory Speed: 2933MHz
Memory Channels: 2
PCI Express Version: PCIe 3.0 x16
PCI-e Lanes: 24
Thermal Solution: Included Wraith Spire
Default TDP / TDP: 95W
Max Temps: 95°C
Supported Technologies: AMD StoreMI Technology, AMD SenseMI Technology, AMD Ryzen™ Master Utility

New Generation, New Improvements

As with any new generation, performance boosting is the name of the game. With the Zen+ platform, AMD aims to push the limits in several core areas and, without spoiling too much of the performance testing coming up shortly, they’ve done a good job of achieving these goals. The production process has shifted over to a 12nm LP, which increases the circuit density from last year’s 14nm chips, though keeps the actual size of the chip the same. The real benefit here is that AMD is able to pull more performance from each bit of voltage taken in by the chip. Conversely, we could also say that the new Zen+ chips use less power to achieve the same frequencies as Gen 1.

Of course, it wouldn’t be a new generation without a boost to clock speeds. While the Ryzen 5 2600X features the same base frequency as the 1600X at 3.6GHz, it now turbos 200MHz faster at 4.2GHz. The Ryzen 7 2700x is all-around more rapid than its counterpart, the R7 1700X, coming in at 3.7GHz and 4.3GHz, 300 and 500MHz increases respectively. In fact, our 2700X is more aptly compared to last year’s flagship, the 1800X, whose clocks are ever so slightly higher, 3. 6GHz and 4.0GHz, but still fall short of AMD’s new premiere 2700X.

Value for the Dollar

Though we can appreciate much about these chips, their greatest impact may just be in how we define value for the dollar. While last year’s 1800X hit the market at $499, the Ryzen 7 2700X is a clear champion in performance and comes in at only $329. That’s a whopping $170 savings — though it’s unclear if a 2800X will be coming to market in the future. The Ryzen 5 2600X, on the other hand, releases for only $229 versus the 1600X’s $249.

This pricing also positions each processor favorably alongside Intel’s current offerings in the i7-8700K and i5-8600K. Both Zen+ R5 and R7 CPUs come in up to $20 cheaper (as of this writing) while offering improved core counts, if slightly slower clock speeds. While both Intel chips offer six cores, only the Core i7 features hyperthreading. The R7 2700X, on the other hand, features two more cores for a full 8 core/16 threads performance boost. The R5 2600X features the same six cores as the i5-8600K but opens up hyperthreading for 12 active threads.

For users whose apps make use of those extra threads, AMD’s Zen+ line is the clear value leader.

Precision Boost 2

Zen+ also brings with is a much improved Precision Boost 2 system. The original, featured on the 1000 series line, would assess the running conditions of the chip to offer heightened boost speeds. The problem, however, was that the system was limited to a maximum of two cores, leaving much of those higher-ended chips at their base clock speeds.

Precision Boost 2 works similarly but applies its boost consistently to all cores and threads so long as voltage and temperature permit it to do so. Thermal management is a limiting factor, so users running better coolers should see greater improvements for a longer period of time. In my testing at stock speeds with both pack-in Wraith coolers, I was quite impressed. For normal gaming — for us, normal use — I didn’t notice any significant drops in my clock speeds.

Improved Latency

Another area that’s seen improvement is the latency timing’s of the CPU’s cache stores. Looking back at generation one, it’s clear that, for gaming at least, there were some margins that could stand to be tightened. AMD has tweaked the utilization of the L1-L3 cache to improve overall latency, theoretically closing those margins in gaming benchmarks. They promise a 13-percent improvement in L1 latency, 34-percent for L2, 16-percent for L3, and 11-percent for DRAM latency. Moving more data faster through the chip results in an all around faster CPU in instructions per cycle, or IPC.

Improved Memory Compatibility

If there was one thorn in the side of first-gen Ryzen, it was the memory compatibility issues that plagued the platform. This was especially true for higher clocked memory — something that I found quite disappointing in my own testing as Ryzen’s Infinity Fabric benefits from faster clocked DRAM. It seems that this problem has largely been solved. Our reviewer’s kit included 16GB of G.Skill Sniper X memory clocked at 3400MHz. As expected, this kit booted up with no issues whatsoever. What about other kits?

As it happens, I had several DDR4 kits available from assorted builds and reviews. I tested 16GB 3200MHz kits from G.Skill (RipJaws V) and Patriot (Viper) and both worked fine by simply enabling the XMP profile in the motherboard’s BIOS. Cue a sigh of relief.

Improved Wraith Coolers

All of this does result in higher overall TDP on the 2700X, which necessitates a better cooler. AMD has delivered with their improved Wraith coolers included with the chip packages we received. Temperatures stayed manageable. The Wraith Prism is the more effective cooler — fitting for the more premium CPU — keeping us at a peak of 72C under load. The Wraith Spire on the 2600X hovered about 9-degrees higher, peaking at 81C.

If you’re a fan of the RGB trend, the Wraith Prism also receives the full RGB treatment and looks just gorgeous.

Click through to Page 2 to see how they held up in our performance testing and overclocking!

Pages:
1
2

Ryzen 5 2600X vs Ryzen 7 2700X — Fortnite Battle Royale with GTX 1660 SUPER Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison

GTX 1660 SUPER with

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

Fortnite Battle Royale

GTX 1660 SUPER with

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

Ryzen 5 2600X
Ryzen 7 2700X

Multi-Thread Performance

14358 Pts

16960 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2138 Pts

2190 Pts

Fortnite Battle Royale

Ryzen 5 2600X vs Ryzen 7 2700X in Fortnite Battle Royale using GTX 1660 SUPER — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

Ryzen 5 2600X
Ryzen 7 2700X

Ultra Quality

Resolution	Frames Per Second
1080p	80. 8 FPS
1080p	83.6 FPS
1440p	52.4 FPS
1440p	54.2 FPS
2160p	28.4 FPS
2160p	29.3 FPS
w1440p	43.2 FPS
w1440p	44.7 FPS

High Quality

Resolution	Frames Per Second
1080p	131.6 FPS
1080p	135.5 FPS
1440p	91.0 FPS
1440p	93.7 FPS
2160p	53.7 FPS
2160p	55.2 FPS
w1440p	77.1 FPS
w1440p	79.4 FPS

Medium Quality

Resolution	Frames Per Second
1080p	182. 4 FPS
1080p	187.3 FPS
1440p	129.7 FPS
1440p	133.2 FPS
2160p	79.0 FPS
2160p	81.0 FPS
w1440p	111.1 FPS
w1440p	114.2 FPS

Low Quality

Resolution	Frames Per Second
1080p	284.1 FPS
1080p	291.1 FPS
1440p	206.9 FPS
1440p	212.2 FPS
2160p	129.5 FPS
2160p	132.7 FPS
w1440p	178.9 FPS
w1440p	183.6 FPS

Ryzen 5 2600X

The Ryzen 5 2600X is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Ryzen 7 2700X

The Ryzen 7 2700X has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
The Ryzen 7 2700X has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU’s with higher core count and lower core speed.
The Ryzen 7 2700X has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare Ryzen 5 2600X vs Ryzen 7 2700X specifications

Ryzen 5 2600X vs Ryzen 7 2700X Architecture

	Ryzen 5 2600X	Ryzen 7 2700X
Codename	Zen	Zen
Generation	Ryzen 5 (Zen+ (Pinnacle Ridge))	Ryzen 7 (Zen+ (Pinnacle Ridge))
Market	Desktop	Desktop
Memory Support	DDR4	DDR4
Part#	YD260XBCM6IAF YD260XBCAFBOX	unknown
Production Status	Active	Active
Released	Apr 2018	Apr 2018

Ryzen 5 2600X vs Ryzen 7 2700X Cache

	Ryzen 5 2600X	Ryzen 7 2700X
Cache L1	96K (per core)	96K (per core)
Cache L2	512K (per core)	512K (per core)
Cache L3	16MB (shared)	16MB (shared)

Ryzen 5 2600X vs Ryzen 7 2700X Cores

	Ryzen 5 2600X	Ryzen 7 2700X
# of Cores	6	8
# of Threads	12	16
Integrated Graphics	N/A	N/A
SMP # CPUs	1	1

Ryzen 5 2600X vs Ryzen 7 2700X Features

	Ryzen 5 2600X	Ryzen 7 2700X
	MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4A SSE4. 1 SSE4.2 AES AVX AVX2 BMI1 BMI2 SHA F16C FMA3 AMD64 EVP AMD-V SMAP SMEP SMT Precision Boost 2 XFR 2	MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4A SSE4.1 SSE4.2 AES AVX AVX2 BMI1 BMI2 SHA F16C FMA3 AMD64 EVP AMD-V SMAP SMEP SMT Precision Boost 2 XFR 2

Ryzen 5 2600X vs Ryzen 7 2700X Notes

	Ryzen 5 2600X	Ryzen 7 2700X
	This processor comes with an unlocked base clock multiplier, allowing users to set the multiplier value higher than shipped value, to facilitate better overclocking.	This processor comes with an unlocked base clock multiplier, allowing users to set the multiplier value higher than shipped value, to facilitate better overclocking.

Ryzen 5 2600X vs Ryzen 7 2700X Performance

	Ryzen 5 2600X	Ryzen 7 2700X
Base Clock	100 MHz	100 MHz
Frequency	3. 6 GHz	3.7 GHz
Multiplier	36.0x	37.0x
Multiplier Unlocked	Yes	Yes
TDP	95 W	105 W
Turbo Clock	up to 4.25 GHz	up to 4.35 GHz
Voltage	unknown	variable

Ryzen 5 2600X vs Ryzen 7 2700X Physical

	Ryzen 5 2600X	Ryzen 7 2700X
Die Size	192 mm²	192 mm²
Foundry	GlobalFoundries	GlobalFoundries
Package	µOPGA-1331	µOPGA-1331
Process Size	12 nm	12 nm
Socket	AMD Socket AM4	AMD Socket AM4
Transistors	4800 million	4800 million
tCaseMax	unknown	unknown

Share Your Comments 0

For three years, AMD Ryzen processors have proven themselves well both in the segment of gaming processors for home PCs and in the professional environment. It is also worth mentioning that more and more streamers prefer Ryzen processors due to good multithreading and high performance per core. But let’s not get ahead of ourselves and look at all the advantages and disadvantages of our TOP 5 AMD Ryzen desktop processors in 2021. nine0003

Let’s go!

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G Processor

The AMD Ryzen 3 processor line is designed for entry-level home systems. Since the Ryzen 3 2200G has integrated graphics, there is no need for a discrete graphics card. For undemanding users, the integrated Radeon Vega 8 is more than enough. The performance of this graphics chip is comparable to Nvidia GT1030.

If it comes to more serious games, then the question arises of the advisability of buying this CPU, because the installation from the eighth Vega, even at the lowest graphics settings, will hardly squeeze out an acceptable 30 FPS in AAA level games. In this case, it is better to consider buying a budget-level graphics card, such as the Nvidia GTX 1050ti, GTX 1060 or Radeon RX 5500XT. nine0003

So, what about the processor itself?

And here everything is very clear. Four cores is four cores. These cores are enough to run most modern programs.

This CPU is not afraid of overclocking, and it is happy to share with you a stable frequency of 3.9GHz. Impressive, isn’t it? The AMD Ryzen 3 2200G is a great CPU for everyday use of your PC and light games.

The Ryzen 3 2200G is the sweet spot for building a budget entry-level PC while keeping your budget as low as possible. And if you need a good processor to work in resource-intensive applications, then it’s better to turn your attention to the older processors of the Ryzen line. nine0003

Features

Number of CPU cores	4
Number of threads	4
Base frequency	3. 5GHz
Max. frequency	up to 3.7GHz
L1 cache size	384KB
L2 cache size	2MB
L3 cache size	4MB
Unlocked multiplier	D a
Process	14nm FinFET
Socket	AM4
PCI Express Version	PCIe 3.0 x8
Overtemperature protection (PIB)	Wraith Stealth
Cooling system (MPK)	Wraith Stealth
TDP nominal / TDP	65W
cTDP	46-65W
Max. temperature	95°C
Max. memory speed	Rated 2933MHz, Supported 3200MHz
Memory type	DDR4
Memory channels	2

Integrated graphics card specifications

GPU model	Radeon™ Vega 8 Graphics
Number of GPU cores	8
GPU frequency	1100MHz

Supported technologies

Core architecture Zen
Technology SenseMI
VR Ready
Software Ryzen™ Master
Enmotus FuzeDrive™ for AMD Ryzen™
Radeon™ Software
Technology Radeon FreeSync™
DisplayPort — Yes
HDMI™ — Yes

Sales launch date — February 12, 2018

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

The AMD Ryzen 7 2700 is primarily an enthusiast processor. 8 cores and 16 threads, much more serious than the previous line in the face of the Ryzen 5 2600 with 6 cores and 12 threads. 2nd generation AMD Ryzen processors are built on the Zen+ architecture, which has received significant improvements over the Zen architecture. The Infinity Fabric bus has not gone away, but the performance per core has increased significantly (by as much as 3%). nine0003

All Zen+-based processors received support for a nominal RAM frequency of 2933 MHz out of the box, versus 2667 MHz on the Zen architecture. Also, AMD engineers reduced CPU latency to RAM by 11%, L1 cache by 13%, L2 cache by 34%, and L3 cache by 13%. All this did not give some crazy performance for all processors on the Zen + architecture, but improved their work with L1, L2, L3 cache and RAM, which in turn affected the overall performance of the entire system. nine0003

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 is not afraid of the heaviest games, programs and streaming. Its cores, threads and power will last for 5 years with a margin. The price tag for a new processor varies from $225 for the OEM version to $300 for the BOX version. On AliExpress and the used market, you can buy it for about $225.

Features

nine0039

Number of CPU cores	8
Number of threads	16
Base frequency	3.2GHz
Max. frequency	up to 4.1GHz
L1 cache size	768KB
L2 cache size	4MB
L3 cache size	16MB
Unlocked multiplier	D a
Process	12nm FinFET
Socket	AM4
PCI Express Version	PCIe 3. 0 x16
Overtemperature protection (PIB)	Wraith Spire with RGB LED
Cooling system (MPK)	Wraith Spire
TDP nominal / TDP	65W
cTDP	46-65W
Max. temperature	95°C
Max. memory speed	Rated 2933MHz, Supported 3200MHz
Memory type	DDR4
Memory channels	2

Supported technologies

Core architecture Zen+
Technology SenseMI
Technology StoreMI
Software Ryzen™ Master
VR Ready Premium

Sales launch date — April 19, 2018

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

And here we come to the true favorite of 2017 in the face of AMD Ryzen 5 1600. Who would have thought that after a few years this processor can still prove itself in modern games and everyday tasks . Although let’s be honest, the architecture of the first generation of Zen has managed to become obsolete by today. But the processor can still deliver decent power for the money. nine0003

For an average user, this processor is enough to perform all everyday tasks and a comfortable FPS. For its low price, it will be able to offer relatively high performance in all games and programs. Good multi-threading ensures fast video and 3D rendering.

Overclocking also takes place. On better crystals, you can reach a frequency of 4.1 GHz across all cores, but it’s still better not to risk it and stop at a stable 3.9-4 GHz.

AMD Ryzen 5 1600 is deservedly the «popular» processor of its time. And if you want to purchase an updated version of the 1600, then you should take a closer look at its updated and modified version AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF .

Features

nine0033 Wraith Spire (No LED )

nine0039

Number of CPU cores	6
Number of threads	12
Base frequency	3.2GHz
Max. frequency	up to 3.6GHz
L1 cache size	576KB
L2 cache size	3MB
L3 cache size	16MB
Unlocked multiplier	D a
Process	14nm
Socket	AM4
PCI Express Version	PCIe 3.0 x16
Overtemperature protection (PIB)
Cooling system (MPK)	Wraith Spire
TDP nominal / TDP	65W
cTDP	46-65W
Max. temperature	95°C
Max. memory speed	Rated 2667MHz, Supported 3000MHz
Memory type	DDR4
Memory channels	2

Supported technologies

Core architecture Zen
Technology SenseMI
Core Virtualization
Software Ryzen™ Master
Enmotus FuzeDrive™ for AMD Ryzen™
AES
FMA3
XFR technology (extended frequency range)

Sales launch date — April 11, 2017

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 is an overclocked version of the R5 1600 with updated Zen+ architecture and 12nm process technology. As for the Zen + architecture itself, everything is exactly the same as in the case of the Ryzen 7 2700, namely, reducing the delays in accessing RAM and L1, L2, L3 cache memory. nine0003

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 boasts better performance than its junior model, Ryzen 5 1600, due to minor improvements. In some cases, the performance increase can reach up to 17%.

Ryzen 5 2600 overclocking lacks stars from the sky and stable operation can be achieved at a frequency of up to 4.1GHz on all cores with a TDP of about 120W. A boxed cooler, which is expected, will not cope with such a volume of TDP and you will have to get at least a three-tube tower cooler. nine0003

For games, 6 physical cores and 12 logical processors (threads) will last a long time. Today, a large number of games are being developed taking into account multithreading, and since our friend has a small reserve for the future, it’s definitely not worth worrying about the fact that this processor will not “pull” modern games.

Thanks to the newer Zen+ architecture, the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 is one of the most attractive processors in its price segment. For $150-200 you will get a new powerful processor with little overclocking potential and support for all modern instructions. nine0003

Features

Number of CPU cores	6
Number of threads	12
Base frequency	3.4GHz
Max. frequency	up to 3.9GHz
L1 cache size	576KB
L2 cache size	3MB
L3 cache size	16MB
Unlocked multiplier	D a
Process	12nm FinFET
Socket	AM4
PCI Express Version	PCIe 3. 0 x16
Overtemperature protection (PIB)	Wraith Stealth
Cooling system (MPK)	Wraith Stealth
TDP nominal / TDP	65W
cTDP	46-65W
Max. temperature	95°C
Max. memory speed	Rated 2933MHz, Supported 3200MHz
Memory type	DDR4
Memory channels	2

Supported technologies

Core architecture Zen+
Technology SenseMI
Technology StoreMI
Software Ryzen™ Master
VR Ready Premium

Sales launch date — April 19, 2018

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Our next test subject is the AMD Ryzen 5 3600. Six-core, twelve-thread processor based on the new Zen2 architecture. You can learn more about the innovations of the architecture in comparison with Zen and Zen + by looking at the review of the Ryzen 7 2700 processor. Note that one of the key features of the Zen2 architecture was the decoupling of the Infinity Fabric bus frequency from the frequency of RAM, which had a positive effect on the processing speed of paged data. from RAM. nine0003

Basically, all the changes in the performance of the 3rd generation Ryzen processors are due to the new architecture. Hence the high frequencies of the processor itself, and support for RAM with a frequency of 3200 MHz as a nominal one.

TDP remains at the level of Ryzen first and second generation, and is 65W due to the “thin” 7nm process technology. But let’s be realistic, still the factory TDP of 65W has nothing to do with real numbers. At stock frequencies, under full load, the Ryzen 5 3600 can “eat” all 90W, which is almost one and a half times higher than the declared power consumption. When overclocking, you should take this moment into account and get a more powerful cooler in advance. Personally, I advise you to immediately change the boxed cooler to a tower cooler with two or three copper tubes.

In general, the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 processor has every chance of becoming the 1600’s successor in the title of «people’s processor». This will not happen immediately, but only when AMD announces a new line of its processors and lowers prices for past generations of Ryzen 5 processors.0003

Features

Number of CPU cores	6
Number of threads	12
Base frequency	3.6GHz
Max. frequency	up to 4.2GHz
L1 cache size	384KB
L2 cache size	3MB
L3 cache size	32MB
Unlocked multiplier	D a
Process	TSMC 7nm FinFET
Socket	AM4
PCI Express Version	PCIe 4. 0 x16
Overtemperature protection (PIB)	Wraith Stealth
Cooling system (MPK)	Wraith Stealth
TDP nominal / TDP	65W
cTDP	46-65W
Max. temperature	95°C
Max. memory speed	Rated 3200MHz, Supported 3600MHz
Memory type	DDR4
Memory channels	2

Supported technologies

Wide range of processors

Lower cost compared to Intel

MINUSES

Infinity Fabric bus (yes, it’s a plus and a minus)
Binding frequency of Infinity to RAM frequency Zen+913 (915 Zen+916) High latency RAM (Zen)
Not the best cooling out of the box

Tags: AMD

Ryzen 5 2600 or Ryzen 7 2700 for Monerka? | Page 3

nine0002

saturn_troy

Dancing with a tambourine

6 Mar 2020

saturn_troy said:

who are interested in configs:
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Patriot Viper Steel 16GB DDR4 Kit 4000(Samsung)
MSI B450I-GAMING-PLUS-AC
——————- —————
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Micron DDR4 2133 DIMM 4Gb x 2
ASUS TUF B450M — PRO GAMING
———————————
3600 works at 4hz, 2700 3. 9hz, in both the selection of the optimal memory frequencies/timings, optimal overclocking and voltage + LLC

Click to expand…

since they all have the same thing with the power supply in the b450 series, and take it only for 6 cores, I think it’s more expedient to overpay for another mother and put 8 or 12 there in the long term, here such a question is mining for the sake of mining or a computer for yourself, and I remember that giga had wild problems with memory! my config is not a calling to buy, but a given. I took msi because of the form factor, for a small case I didn’t think that some kind of holivar

saturn_troy said:

since they all have the same thing with the power supply in the b450 series, and take it only for 6 cores, I think it’s more expedient to overpay for another mother and put 8 or 12 there in the future, here such a question is mining for the sake of mining or a computer for yourself, and I remember that Gigi had wild problems with memory! my config is not a calling to buy, but a given. msi took it because of the form factor, for a small case I didn’t think that some kind of holivar would start from this

Click to expand …

was bought directly under 2700x? or did it happen? once again, I managed to buy ASUS TUF B450M — PRO GAMING for 500r more than than asrock b450 pro4 at the time of purchase, asrock b450 pro4 has an element base as lucky with the batch, besides, there are 3×2 + 3, against 4×2 + 2, the radiators are thinner, still no LLC, pressure boost + stupid bios, I buy equipment based on: this is a rare purchase for a long time of use

saturn_troy said:

was bought directly under 2700x? or did it happen? once again, I managed to buy ASUS TUF B450M — PRO GAMING is 500r more expensive than than asrock b450 pro4 at the time of purchase, asrock b450 pro4 has an element base as lucky with the batch, besides, there are 3×2 + 3, against 4×2 + 2, the radios are thinner, there is still no LLC, presizhin boost + stupid bios, I buy equipment based on: it is a rare purchase for a long time of use

Click to expand. ..

saturn_troy said:

was bought directly under 2700x? or did it happen? once again, I managed to buy ASUS TUF B450M — PRO GAMING for 500r more than than asrock b450 pro4 at the time of purchase, the asrock b450 pro4 has an element base as lucky with the batch, besides, there are 3×2 + 3, against 4×2 + 2, the radicals are thinner, there is still no LLC, presizhin boost + dumb bios, I buy equipment based on: this is a rare purchase on long time use

Click to expand. ..

I got an ASRock AB350M Pro 4 under 3900X just to see if the 12-core could work well under full load on a relatively budget mATX board, and I ended up liking it more than the MSI X470 Gaming Pro. The location of everything on the board is more convenient, with incorrect settings it simply prompts you to enter the BIOS, and does not give out a blank screen with the need to constantly use Clear CMOS, the heatsinks on the VRM are made much smarter and cool well even with light airflow. LLC, Precision Boost and other fine tuning are not really needed if you want to work at a constant high frequency for all cores under load at the same voltage and reset frequencies and voltages in idle. The same memory also overclocks the same way, all the timing settings that affect performance are there and there. nine0003

Найти:

Свежие записи

Intel pentium dual core 6000: Please click the green button to continue.

Rivatuner osd not display in league of legends: Reddit — Dive into anything

980 ti wattage: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti Specs

A6-5200M: AMD A-Series A6-5200 Notebook Processor

G502 lightspeed review: Logitech G502 LIGHTSPEED Review — RTINGS.com

Свежие комментарии
Архивы

Октябрь 2023

Сентябрь 2023

Август 2023

Июль 2023

Июнь 2023

Май 2023

Апрель 2023

Март 2023

Февраль 2023

Январь 2023

Декабрь 2022

Ноябрь 2022

Октябрь 2022

Сентябрь 2022

Август 2022

Июль 2022

Июнь 2022

Май 2022

Апрель 2022

Март 2022

Февраль 2022

Январь 2022

Декабрь 2021

Ноябрь 2021

Октябрь 2021

Сентябрь 2021

Август 2021

Июль 2021

Июнь 2021

Май 2021

Апрель 2021

Март 2021

Февраль 2021

Январь 2021

Декабрь 2020

Ноябрь 2020

Октябрь 2020

Сентябрь 2020

Август 2020

Июль 2020

Июнь 2020

Май 2020

Апрель 2020

Март 2020

Февраль 2020

Январь 2020

Декабрь 2019

Рубрики

Amd

Benchmark

Cpu

Gpu

Miscellaneous

Monitor

Playstation

Radeon

Windows

Xbox

Мета

Войти

Лента записей

Лента комментариев

WordPress.org

Core architecture Zen2
Technology SenseMI
Technology StoreMI
Software Ryzen™ Master
VR Ready Premium