AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs Intel Core i7-7700K Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs Intel Core i7-7700K
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 on one side and the Intel Core i7-7700K on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 6 cores, 12 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,2GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,5 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
Processor | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | Intel Core i7-7700K | ||||||
Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
Microarchitecture | Zen 2 | Kaby Lake | ||||||
Core name | Matisse | Kaby Lake-S | ||||||
Family | Ryzen 5 3000 | Core i7-7000 | ||||||
Part number(s), S-Spec |
100-000000031, |
BXC80677I77700K, |
||||||
Release date | Q3 2019 | Q1 2017 | ||||||
Lithography | 7 nm FinFET | 14 nm | ||||||
Transistors | 4. 800.000.000 | 2.150.000.000 | ||||||
Cores | 6 | 4 | ||||||
Threads | 12 | 8 | ||||||
Base frequency | 3,6 GHz | 4,2 GHz | ||||||
Turbo frequency | 4,2 GHz | 4,5 GHz | ||||||
Cache memory | 32 MB | 8 MB | ||||||
Max memory capacity | 128 GB | 64 GB | ||||||
Memory types |
DDR4-3200 |
DDR4-2133/2400, |
||||||
Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
Max memory bandwidth | 47,68 GB/s | 38,4 GB/s | ||||||
Max PCIe lanes | 20 | 16 | ||||||
TDP | 65 W | 91 W | ||||||
Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
GPU integrated graphics | None | Intel HD Graphics 630 | ||||||
GPU execution units | — | 24 | ||||||
GPU shading units | — | 192 | ||||||
GPU base clock | — | 350 MHz | ||||||
GPU boost clock | — | 1150 MHz | ||||||
GPU FP32 floating point | — | 384 GFLOPS | ||||||
Socket | AM4 | LGA1151 | ||||||
Compatible motherboard | Socket AM4 Motherboard | Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard | ||||||
Maximum temperature | 95°C | 100°C | ||||||
Crypto engine |
— |
AES New Instructions, |
||||||
Security |
— |
Software Guard Extensions, |
||||||
Max display resolution |
— |
4096×2304@60Hz |
||||||
CPU-Z single thread | 509 | 574 | ||||||
CPU-Z multi thread | 4. 039 | 3.004 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 single thread | 195 | 200 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 1.564 | 995 | ||||||
Cinebench R23 single thread | 1.215 | 1.207 | ||||||
Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 9.109 | 6.074 | ||||||
PassMark single thread | 2.570 | 2.736 | ||||||
PassMark CPU Mark | 17.842 | 9.687 | ||||||
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
5.470 | 5.555 | ||||||
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
27. 530 | 18.316 | ||||||
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
484 GFLOPS | 326,1 GFLOPS | ||||||
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
424 pts / W | 201 pts / W | ||||||
Amazon | ||||||||
eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor AMD Ryzen 5 3600 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i7-7700K is bigger, that the PDT of AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is lower. The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 was designed earlier.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
509 4.039 |
Intel Core i7-7700K |
574 3.004 |
In single core, the difference is -11%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 34%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
195 1.564 |
Intel Core i7-7700K |
200 995 |
In single core, the difference is -3%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 57%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
1.215 9.109 |
Intel Core i7-7700K |
1.207 6.074 |
In single core, the difference is 1%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 50%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
2.570 17.842 |
Intel Core i7-7700K |
2.736 9.687 |
In single core, the difference is -6%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 84%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
5.470 27.530 |
Intel Core i7-7700K |
5.555 18.316 |
In single core, the difference is -2%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 50%.
On Linux 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
5.782 30.309 |
Intel Core i7-7700K |
5.887 16.660 |
In single core, the difference is -2%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 82%.
On Android 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
5.610 27.268 |
Intel Core i7-7700K |
4.560 14.945 |
In single core, the difference is 23%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 82%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
5. 540 28.445 |
Intel Core i7-7700K |
5.711 19.376 |
In single core, the difference is -3%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 47%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Intel equivalentIntel Core i7-7700K AMD equivalent
See also:
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
Intel Core i7-7700Intel Core i7-7700HQIntel Core i7-7700T
i7 7700K vs Ryzen 5 3600
i7 7700K vs Ryzen 5 3600
FPS Benchmark
i7 7700K vs Ryzen 5 3600
i7 7700K
i7 7700K
Benchmarks
working with
gtx 1070
i7 7700K
Ryzen 5 3600
CSGO
209 fps
211 fps
LOL
189 fps
191 fps
Warframe
144 fps
145 fps
DOTA2
138 fps
140 fps
overwatch
134 fps
136 fps
Path of Exile
132 fps
134 fps
StarCraft 2
126 fps
128 fps
Call of Duty ww2
119 fps
120 fps
A Way Out
115 fps
116 fps
Sea of Thieves
111 fps
112 fps
Frostpunk
110 fps
112 fps
Fortnite
109 fps
110 fps
AirMech Strike
108 fps
109 fps
destiny2
102 fps
103 fps
Far Cry 5
90 fps
91 fps
apexlegends
86 fps
87 fps
rainbow6siege
83 fps
84 fps
Radical Heights
79 fps
80 fps
BATTLETECH
72 fps
73 fps
GTA
71 fps
72 fps
PUBG
70 fps
71 fps
Total War THREE KINGDOMS
65 fps
65 fps
World of Tanks
58 fps
59 fps
Battlefield 4
56 fps
57 fps
More Benchmarks
Games
destiny2
overwatch
GTA
DOTA2
CSGO
Warframe
rainbow6siege
Fortnite
Sea of Thieves
A Way Out
LOL
Far Cry 5
PUBG
Call of Duty ww2
Radical Heights
Battlefield 4
World of Tanks
apexlegends
Path of Exile
Total War THREE KINGDOMS
Frostpunk
BATTLETECH
AirMech Strike
StarCraft 2
GPUs
RTX 3070
RTX 4090
RX 7900 XTX
RTX 4080
RTX 4070 Ti
RX 7900 XT
RTX 4070
RX 6900 XT
RX 6800 XT
RTX 3080
RX 6800
rtx 2080 Ti
RX 6700
rtx 2080
gtx 1080 Ti
gtx Titan X
rtx 2070 super
rtx 2070
gtx 1080
rx 5700 xt
rtx 2060 super
rx 5700
rtx 2060
RX Vega 64
gtx 1070 Ti
gtx 1070
gtx 1660 Ti
gtx 1660 super
gtx 980 Ti
gtx 1660
CPUs
i9 13900k
i7 13700k
Ryzen 7900x
i7 12700k
Ryzen 5900x
Ryzen 5800x
i5 13600k
Ryzen 5700x
Ryzen 5600
i5 13500
i5 12600k
Ryzen 5500
i5 13400f
i7 9900k
i7 10700k
i7 9700k
Ryzen 7 3900x
Ryzen 7 3800x
i5 10400
Ryzen 7 3700x
Ryzen 5 3600x
i7 8700K
Ryzen 5 3600
i7 7700K
©fpsbenchmark.