AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs Intel Core i7-9700K
|
|
|
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs Intel Core i7-9700K
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 on one side and the Intel Core i7-9700K on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 6 cores, 12 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,2GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,9 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | Intel Core i7-9700K | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Zen 2 | Coffee Lake | ||||||
| Core name | Matisse | Coffee Lake-S | ||||||
| Family | Ryzen 5 3000 | Core i7-9000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | 100-000000031, 100-000000031BOX |
BX80684I79700K, BXC80684I79700K, CM8068403874212, SRELT, QQPK |
||||||
| Release date | Q3 2019 | Q4 2018 | ||||||
| Lithography | 7 nm FinFET | 14 nm++ | ||||||
| Transistors | 4. 800.000.000 |
— | ||||||
| Cores | 6 | 8 | ||||||
| Threads | 12 | 8 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 3,6 GHz | 3,6 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 4,2 GHz | 4,9 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 32 MB | 12 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-2666 | ||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 47,68 GB/s | 41,6 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 20 | 16 | ||||||
| TDP | 65 W | 95 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | None | Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Coffee Lake) | ||||||
| GPU execution units | — | 23 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | — | 184 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | — | 350 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | — | 1200 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | — | 423,2 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1151 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket AM4 Motherboard | Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 95°C | 100°C | ||||||
| Crypto engine | — | AES New Instructions, Secure Key |
||||||
| Security | — | Software Guard Extensions, Memory Protection Extensions, OS Guard, Trusted Execution Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Boot Guard |
||||||
| Max display resolution | — | 4096 x 2304@60Hz | ||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 509 | 554 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 4. 039 |
4.158 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 195 | 211 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 1.564 | 1.510 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 1.215 | 1.273 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 9.109 | 9.419 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 2.570 | 2.908 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 17.842 | 14.549 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
5.470 | 6.084 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
27. 530 |
29.763 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
484 GFLOPS | 424,3 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
424 pts / W | 313 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor Intel Core i7-9700K has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i7-9700K is bigger, that the PDT of AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is lower. The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 was designed earlier.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-9700K |
554 4.158 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
509 4.039 |
In single core, the difference is 9%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 3%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
195 1.564 |
| Intel Core i7-9700K |
211 1.510 |
In single core, the difference is -8%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 4%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-9700K |
1.273 9.419 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
1.215 9.109 |
In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 3%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
2.570 17.842 |
| Intel Core i7-9700K |
2.908 14.549 |
In single core, the difference is -12%.
In multi-core, the differential gap is 23%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-9700K |
6.084 29.763 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
5.470 27.530 |
In single core, the difference is 11%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 8%.
On Linux 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
5.782 30.309 |
| Intel Core i7-9700K |
6.057 24.055 |
In single core, the difference is -5%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 26%.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
5.610 27.268 |
| Intel Core i7-9700K |
5.273 24.482 |
In single core, the difference is 6%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 11%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-9700K |
6.  22931.150 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
5.540 28.445 |
In single core, the difference is 12%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 10%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Intel equivalentIntel Core i7-9700K AMD equivalent
See also:
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
Intel Core i7-9700Intel Core i7-9700EIntel Core i7-9700FIntel Core i7-9700KFIntel Core i7-9700T
Ryzen 5 3600 vs i7-9700K — Valorant with R5 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison
R5 with
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Valorant
R5 with
Intel Core i7-9700K @ 3.
60GHz
Ryzen 5 3600
i7-9700K
Multi-Thread Performance
19634 Pts
17589 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2900 Pts
2834 Pts
Valorant
Ryzen 5 3600 vs i7-9700K in Valorant using R5 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions
Ryzen 5 3600
i7-9700K
Ultra Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
50.0 FPS |
| 1080p |
51.2 FPS |
| 1440p |
39.5 FPS |
| 1440p |
39.9 FPS |
| 2160p |
34.4 FPS |
| 2160p |
34.8 FPS |
| w1440p |
39.6 FPS |
| w1440p |
40.0 FPS |
High Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
87. |
| 1080p |
89.2 FPS |
| 1440p |
71.4 FPS |
| 1440p |
72.0 FPS |
| 2160p |
63.4 FPS |
| 2160p |
64.0 FPS |
| w1440p |
71.6 FPS |
| w1440p |
72.2 FPS |
4 FPSMedium Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
124.9 FPS |
| 1080p |
127.3 FPS |
| 1440p |
103.3 FPS |
| 1440p |
104.2 FPS |
| 2160p |
92.4 FPS |
| 2160p |
93.2 FPS |
| w1440p |
103.5 FPS |
| w1440p |
104.4 FPS |
Low Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
199. |
| 1080p |
203.4 FPS |
| 1440p |
167.1 FPS |
| 1440p |
168.4 FPS |
| 2160p |
150.3 FPS |
| 2160p |
151.7 FPS |
| w1440p |
167.5 FPS |
| w1440p |
168.8 FPS |
8 FPSRyzen 5 3600
- The Ryzen 5 3600 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
- The Ryzen 5 3600 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
- The Ryzen 5 3600 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
- The Ryzen 5 3600 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
- The Ryzen 5 3600 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i7-9700K
- The i7-9700K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
- The i7-9700K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
Compare Ryzen 5 3600 vs i7-9700K specifications
Ryzen 5 3600 vs i7-9700K Architecture
| Ryzen 5 3600 | i7-9700K | |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Zen 2 | Coffee Lake |
| Generation | Ryzen 5 (Zen 2) |
Core i7 (Coffee Lake Refresh) |
| Market | Desktop | Desktop |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Part# | unknown | unknown |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Released | Jul 2019 | Oct 2018 |
Ryzen 5 3600 vs i7-9700K Cache
| Ryzen 5 3600 | i7-9700K | |
|---|---|---|
| Cache L1 | 96K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| Cache L2 | 512K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Cache L3 | 32MB (shared) | 12MB (shared) |
Ryzen 5 3600 vs i7-9700K Cores
| Ryzen 5 3600 | i7-9700K | |
|---|---|---|
| # of Cores | 6 | 8 |
| # of Threads | 12 | 8 |
| Integrated Graphics | N/A | UHD Graphics 630 |
| SMP # CPUs | 1 | 1 |
Ryzen 5 3600 vs i7-9700K Performance
| Ryzen 5 3600 | i7-9700K | |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Frequency | 3. 6 GHz |
3.6 GHz |
| Multiplier | 36.0x | 36.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| TDP | 65 W | 95 W |
| Turbo Clock | up to 4.2 GHz | up to 4.9 GHz |
| Voltage | variable | unknown |
Ryzen 5 3600 vs i7-9700K Physical
| Ryzen 5 3600 | i7-9700K | |
|---|---|---|
| Die Size | unknown | unknown |
| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |
| Package | FC-LGA14C | |
| Process Size | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Transistors | 4,800 million | unknown |
| tCaseMax | unknown | 72°C |
Share Your Comments 0
Compare Ryzen 5 3600 vs i7-9700K in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity
2016
Hitman
2016
Rise of the Tomb Raider
2016
The Division
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
DiRT Rally
2015
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
The Witcher 3
2015
Total War: Attila
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Dragon Age: Inquisition
2014
Far Cry 4
2014
GRID Autosport
2014
Shadow of Mordor
2014
The Talos Principle
2014
Battlefield 4
2013
Crysis 3
2013
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We did not find such a page on our website: /ru/cpu/core-i7-9700k-protiv-ryzen-5-3600%23built-in-video
Popular video card comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
nine0010
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
nine0012 1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8GB
nine0004
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
Popular video cards
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
4090
nine0004
Radeon RX
580
GeForce RTX
3060
Radeon RX
Vega 7
GeForce GTX
1650
Popular
processor comparisons
nine0005
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Ryzen 5
nine0012 5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Core i5
10400F
nine0002 vs
Core i3
12100F
Core i5
1135G7
vs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Popular processors
Ryzen 5
5500U
nine0010
EPYC
7h22
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
3500U
Ryzen 3
5300U
nine0000 Intel Core i7 9700K vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600:
performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i7 9700K
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Which is better: 8-core Intel Core i7 9700K at 3.
6 GHz or AMD Ryzen 5 3600 with 6 cores at 3.6 GHz? To find out, read our comparative testing of these desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single -flow performance
Rating in tests using one nucleus
Core i7 9700k
60
Ryzen 5 3600
Multi -flow performance
Tests in benchmarks, where all nucleus
9 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000
Core i7 9700k
37
Ryzen 5 3600
38
Energy Equality
Energy Effects Chip
Core I7 9700K
44
Ryzen 5 3600
RIGH
Core i7 9700K
48
Ryzen 5 3600
51
Key differences
What are the main differences between 3600 and 9700K
Reasons to choose Intel Core i7 9700K
- Has 2 more physical cores
- 17% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4.
9 GHz vs. 4.2 GHz)
- Integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630
Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Has 20 MB more L3 cache
- More modern process technology — 7 vs. 14 nanometers
- 32% lower than Core i7 9700K peak power consumption — 65 vs 95 Watts
- New PCI Express — 4.0 standard
- 9 months later than rival
- 6.08 GB/s (15%) higher maximum memory bandwidth
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Core i7 9700K
1291
Ryzen 5 3600
+1%
1302
Cinebench R23 (multi-core)
Core i7 9700K
9483
Ryzen 5 3600
+1%
9583
Passmark CPU (single core)
Core i7 9700K
+12%
2902
Ryzen 5 3600
2587
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Core i7 9700K
900 R2 14631
60002
+22%
17827
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Core i7 9700K
+3%
1290
Ryzen 5 3600
1253
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Core i7 9700K
+4%
7504
Ryzen 5 3600
7197
▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23
Specifications
List of full technical specifications for Intel Core i7 9700K and AMD Ryzen 5 3600
General information
| Manufacturer | Intel | |
| Release date | October 8, 2018 | July 7, 2019 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Coffee Lake | Matisse |
| Model number | i7-9700K | — |
| Socket | LGA-1151 | AM4 |
| Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics 630 | No |
Performance
| Number of cores | 8 | 6 |
| Number of threads | 8 | 12 |
| Frequency | 3. |
3.6 GHz |
| Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 4.9 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 36x | 36x |
| Bus speed | 8 GT/s | — |
| Level 1 cache | 64KB (per core) | 64KB (per core) |
| Level 2 cache | 256KB (per core) | 512KB (per core) |
| Level 3 cache | 12MB (shared) | 32MB (shared) |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Power consumption
| Number of transistors | — | 3.8 billion |
| Process | 14 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 W | 65 W |
| Critical temperature | 100°C | 95°C |
| Integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| GPU clock | 350 MHz | — |
| Boost GPU frequency | 1200 MHz | — |
| Shader blocks | 192 | — |
| TMUs | 24 | — |
| ROPs | 3 | — |
| Computer units | 24 | — |
| TGP | 15 W | — |
| Max. |
4096×2304 — 60Hz |
Igpu Flops
Core i7 9700k
0.38 Teraflops
Ryzen 5 3600
N/D
Memory Support
| memory type | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max. size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Number of channels | 2 | |
| Max. bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 47.68 GB/s |
| ECC support | No | Yes |
Other
| Official site | Site Intel Core i7 9700K | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 website |
| PCI Express Version | 4.0 | |
| Max. PCI Express lanes | 16 | 16 |
| Extended instructions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 | — |
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Core i7 9700K
43 (30.