Ryzen 5 3600 vs ryzen 5 1600: Please click the green button to continue.

31 мая, 2021

Page not found

Page not found









We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/ryzen-5-1600-vs-ryzen-5-3600%23general-info

Popular graphics cards comparisons



GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs



GeForce RTX
3060




GeForce RTX
2060 Super

vs



GeForce RTX
3060




GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB

vs



Radeon RX
580




GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs



GeForce RTX
3070




GeForce GTX
1660 Super

vs



GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB




GeForce GTX
1660 Ti

vs



GeForce GTX
1660 Super

Popular graphics cards



GeForce RTX
4090




Radeon RX
580




GeForce GTX
1650




Radeon RX
Vega 7




GeForce RTX
3060




GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

Popular CPU comparisons



Ryzen 5
5600X

vs



Core i5
12400F




Ryzen 5
3600

vs



Ryzen 5
5500




Core i5
10400F

vs



Core i3
12100F




Ryzen 5
3600

vs



Core i5
10400F




Ryzen 5
3600

vs



Core i3
12100F




Core i5
12400F

vs



Core i5
13400F

Popular CPUs



EPYC
9654




Core i3
1115G4




Ryzen 5
5500U




Core i5
12400F




Core i5
1135G7




Core i5
1235U












Page not found

Page not found









We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/ryzen-5-1600-vs-ryzen-5-3600%23characteristics

Popular graphics cards comparisons



GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs



GeForce RTX
3060




GeForce RTX
2060 Super

vs



GeForce RTX
3060




GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB

vs



Radeon RX
580




GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs



GeForce RTX
3070




GeForce GTX
1660 Super

vs



GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB




GeForce GTX
1660 Ti

vs



GeForce GTX
1660 Super

Popular graphics cards



GeForce RTX
4090




Radeon RX
580




GeForce GTX
1650




Radeon RX
Vega 7




GeForce RTX
3060




GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

Popular CPU comparisons



Ryzen 5
5600X

vs



Core i5
12400F




Ryzen 5
3600

vs



Ryzen 5
5500




Core i5
10400F

vs



Core i3
12100F




Ryzen 5
3600

vs



Core i5
10400F




Ryzen 5
3600

vs



Core i3
12100F




Core i5
12400F

vs



Core i5
13400F

Popular CPUs



EPYC
9654




Core i3
1115G4




Ryzen 5
5500U




Core i5
12400F




Core i5
1135G7




Core i5
1235U












frequencies against GECID.

com streams. Page 1

::>Processors
>2021
> Comparison of Ryzen 5 1600 AF vs. Core i3-10105F vs. GeForce GTX 1650: clocks vs. threads

03-11-2021

Page 1
Page 2
One page

While you are warming up, we will briefly remind you that the idea for this material came about by accident. In one of the past, we tested the adequacy of the PC assembly autogenerator from the TELEMART.ua store. The one with a wide selection of components, everything for eSports, ongoing promotions and even a section with discounted goods for those who want to save a little.

Under the given parameters, the autogenerator offered three options. We chose the cheapest one with Ryzen 5 1600 AF at the base. But recently, this processor has often flashed in our materials, so we decided to test the Core i3-10105F.

Moreover, these are the two most popular options in Telemart. In the comments, you asked to compare the resulting bundle with a similar assembly on AM4 with Ryzen 5 on board. This is the request we are fulfilling.

In the original config, we changed only two positions — the processor and the motherboard. The original Ryzen 5 1600 came out in 2017. It is based on the 14nm Zen architecture and features 6 cores, 12 threads with an unlocked multiplier and a 65W TDP. And in 2019In the same year, the Ryzen 5 1600 AF version appeared with 12nm Zen + architecture and similar characteristics.

Since the AMD processor is more expensive than Intel, the motherboard was taken cheaper than last time, so that the total assembly costs were approximately equal. The choice fell on the proven and popular MSI B450M PRO-VDH MAX. It is suitable for future upgrades, offers a heatsink for the VRM part, an M.2 slot for fast storage and a reinforced video card slot.

Other components have not changed. Let’s go through them quickly. See the previous article for more details.

In order to save money, we use a boxed cooler with a 92mm fan. At the same time, let’s see if it allows you to at least slightly overclock the processor. And whether there will be at the same time stable work.

The 16 GB DDR4-2666 GOODRAM IRDM X Black RAM kit was easily overclocked to 3200 MHz with CL16 timings and 1.25 V. It was possible to speed it up to 3600, but with raising the timings. We decided to keep assemblies as equal as possible and left the memory unchanged.

Uses a 2.5-inch third-generation GOODRAM CL100 SSD with a capacity of 480 GB for OS, games and other data storage. For most budget systems, it will be enough. Endurance is declared at the level of 350 TB, and the warranty is 3 years.

Graphics processing was entrusted to the low-profile MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Low Profile OC video card with a slight factory overclocking of the GPU frequency Boost from 1665 to 1695 MHz. Video memory is represented by 4 GB GDDR5, although there are versions with GDDR6 on sale.

The CHIEFTEC Task series 500W power supply is a good workhorse in this segment. It offers a single +12V channel with a load capacity of up to 456W. He also has an 80 PLUS Bronze certificate and a full list of protections. Read more about it in our review.

The Deepcool MATREXX 30 has gained popularity due to its thoughtful design and good features. It has ventilation holes on the front panel and a viewing window on the side. It is designed with an eye on compact systems with microATX and Mini-ITX boards.

The cost of these assemblies and the exchange rate were taken at the time of compiling the first config:

Component

Price, ₴ / $

Component

Price, ₴ / $

Intel Core i3-10105F

2599 / 97

AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF

3479 / 130

ASUS PRIME B560M-A

3249 / 122

MSI B450M PRO-VDH MAX

1859 / 70

MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Low Profile OC

10999 / 412

MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Low Profile OC

10999 / 412

DDR4-2666 GOODRAM IRDM X Black

2 x 1009 / 76

DDR4-2666 GOODRAM IRDM X Black

2 x 1009 / 76

CHIEFTEC Task 500W

1199 / 45

CHIEFTEC Task 500W

1199 / 45

GOODRAM CL100 Gen. 3

1467 / 55

GOODRAM CL100 Gen.3

1467 / 55

DeepCool MATREX 30

971 / 36

DeepCool MATREX 30

971 / 36

Total cost

22502 / 843

Total cost

21992 / 824

Course $1 = ₴26.69

Gameplay recorded by external system with AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K without loss of performance.

The stock clock speeds of the processors are too different. To level things up a bit, we overclocked the Ryzen 5 across all cores to 3.8GHz. In theory, under a boxed cooler, it is possible up to 4 GHz, but then overheating is possible in tasks that are demanding on the processor.

This is what we see in the stress test. The maximum temperature of the cores rose to 99°C at a critical value of 95°C, but there was no throttling and the frequency was stable at 3.8 GHz. The system worked in this mode without reboots.

The feasibility of overclocking was tested in several synthetic benchmarks. The speed of working with memory in AIDA64 did not change much after overclocking. A system with Ryzen 5 feels better when reading and copying data. Writing information is a little faster with the Core i3.

And, of course, the RAM access latency for Intel processors is traditionally lower.

In 3DMark Fire Stike , we first look at the Physics Score. At face value, Ryzen 5 outperforms the competitor by 23%. After overclocking, the advantage increases to 31%.

Similar to the picture, but with a smaller gap gives 3DMark Time Spy . At nominal, the AMD chip is faster than Intel by 11% in terms of CPU Score, and in overclocking — by 20%. Maybe we overclocked it in vain, because it already feels great in synthetics? Let’s not jump to conclusions though.

Cross-platform 3DMark Wild Life relies more on the graphics subsystem. And here it is the same. But still, overclocking the processor is useful. In nominal terms, the assembly with Core i3 is 2% faster. After overclocking, the minimal victory is on the side of Ryzen 5.

And finally, in PCMark , the Intel processor did not feel the competition. In stock, its advantage tends to 15%. Overclocking the Ryzen 5 helped bring the difference down to a maximum of 12%.

Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 5 1600 — Fortnite Battle Royale vs GTX 1660 9 performance comparison0001

GTX 1660 with

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Fortnite Battle Royale

GTX 1660 with

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 1600

Multi-Thread Performance

19634 Pts

12265 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2900 Pts

1821 Pts

Fortnite Battle Royale

Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 5 1600 in Fortnite Battle Royale using GTX 1660 — CPU performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium and Low Quality settings at 108 resolution 0p, 1440p, ultrawide , 4K

Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 1600

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames per second
1080p

87. 0 FPS

1080p

68.1 FPS

1440p

56.8 FPS

1440p

44.4 FPS

2160p

30.7 FPS

2160p

24.0 FPS

w1440p

46.8 FPS

w1440p

36.6 FPS

High quality
Resolution Frames per second
1080p

140.1 FPS

1080p

113.8 FPS

1440p

97.5 FPS

1440p

79. 0 FPS

2160p

57.4 FPS

2160p

46.4 FPS

w1440p

82.6 FPS

w1440p

66.9 FPS

Medium quality
Resolution Frames per second
1080p

193.2 FPS

1080p

159.6 FPS

1440p

138.3 FPS

1440p

113.5 FPS

2160p

84.2 FPS

2160p

68.8 FPS

w1440p

118. 4 FPS

w1440p

97.1 FPS

Low quality
Resolution Frames per second
1080p

299.4 FPS

1080p

251.1 FPS

1440p

219.7 FPS

1440p

182.7 FPS

2160p

137.6 FPS

2160p

113.5 FPS

w1440p

190.1 FPS

w1440p

157.7 FPS

Ryzen 5 3600
  • Ryzen 5 3600 has higher L3 cache. This is useful when you have significant multi-processor workloads, many computational processes at the same time. Rather on a server rather than a personal computer for interactive workloads.
  • In some games, a processor with a higher clock speed, or with the technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), performs better than other processors with more cores and a lower core frequency.
  • The Ryzen 5 3600 has a higher turbo clock. Turbo Boost is a processor feature that will run at a processor clock speed faster than its base clock speed if certain conditions are present. This will allow older software that runs on fewer cores to run better on newer hardware. Since games are also software, they are also applicable.
  • Ryzen 5 3600 The Ryzen 5 3600 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can turn on and off, the faster it can work. And transistors that turn on and off with less power are more efficient, reducing the operating power or «dynamic power» required by the processor.
Ryzen 5 1600