Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 7 3700X — Fortnite Battle Royale with GTX 1660 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison
GTX 1660 with
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Fortnite Battle Royale
GTX 1660 with
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 7 3700X
Multi-Thread Performance
19634 Pts
23838 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2900 Pts
2917 Pts
Fortnite Battle Royale
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 7 3700X in Fortnite Battle Royale using GTX 1660 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions
Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 7 3700X
Ultra Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
87.
|
1080p |
87.4 FPS
|
1440p |
56.8 FPS
|
1440p |
57.0 FPS
|
2160p |
30.7 FPS
|
2160p |
30.9 FPS
|
w1440p |
46.8 FPS
|
w1440p |
47.0 FPS
|
High Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
140.1 FPS
|
1080p |
140.
|
1440p |
97.5 FPS
|
1440p |
97.8 FPS
|
2160p |
57.4 FPS
|
2160p |
57.8 FPS
|
w1440p |
82.6 FPS
|
w1440p |
82.9 FPS
|
Medium Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
193.2 FPS
|
1080p |
193.9 FPS
|
1440p |
138.
|
1440p |
138.6 FPS
|
2160p |
84.2 FPS
|
2160p |
84.6 FPS
|
w1440p |
118.4 FPS
|
w1440p |
118.9 FPS
|
Low Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
299.4 FPS
|
1080p |
300.4 FPS
|
1440p |
219.7 FPS
|
1440p |
220.
|
2160p |
137.6 FPS
|
2160p |
138.3 FPS
|
w1440p |
190.1 FPS
|
w1440p |
190.7 FPS
|
Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 7 3700X
- The Ryzen 7 3700X has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
- The Ryzen 7 3700X has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
- The Ryzen 7 3700X has a higher turbo clock boost.
Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
Compare Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 7 3700X specifications
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Architecture
Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 3700X | |
---|---|---|
Codename | Zen 2 | Zen 2 |
Generation | Ryzen 5 (Zen 2) |
Ryzen 7 (Zen 2) |
Market | Desktop | Desktop |
Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Part# | unknown | unknown |
Production Status | Active | Active |
Released | Jul 2019 | Jul 2019 |
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Cache
Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 3700X | |
---|---|---|
Cache L1 | 96K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
Cache L2 | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
Cache L3 | 32MB (shared) | 32MB |
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Cores
Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 3700X | |
---|---|---|
# of Cores | 6 | 8 |
# of Threads | 12 | 16 |
Integrated Graphics | N/A | N/A |
SMP # CPUs | 1 | 1 |
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance
Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 3700X | |
---|---|---|
Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
Frequency | 3.![]() |
3.6 GHz |
Multiplier | 36.0x | 36.0x |
Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
TDP | 65 W | 65 W |
Turbo Clock | up to 4.2 GHz | up to 4.4 GHz |
Voltage | variable | variable |
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Physical
Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 3700X | |
---|---|---|
Die Size | unknown | unknown |
Foundry | TSMC | TSMC |
Package | ||
Process Size | 7 nm | 7 nm |
Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | AMD Socket AM4 |
Transistors | 4,800 million | 19,200 million |
tCaseMax | unknown | unknown |
Share Your Comments 0
Compare Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 7 3700X in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Summary
-
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
100%
-
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
114%
Relative performance
-
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
103%
-
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
100%
Relative performance
-
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
100%
-
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
133%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
None |
Reasons to consider AMD Ryzen 7 3700X |
Much higher multi threaded performance (around 33% higher).![]() |
Gaming
No clear winner declared
Productivity
HWBench recommends AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.
Features
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
MMX | ||||
SSE | ||||
SSE2 | ||||
SSE3 | ||||
SSSE3 | ||||
SSE4A | ||||
SSE4.1 | ||||
SSE4.2 | ||||
AES | ||||
AVX | ||||
AVX2 | ||||
BMI1 | ||||
BMI2 | ||||
SHA | ||||
F16C | ||||
FMA3 | ||||
AMD64 | ||||
EVP | ||||
AMD-V | ||||
SMAP | ||||
SMEP | ||||
SMT | ||||
Precision Boost 2 | ||||
XFR 2 |
Architecture
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Architecture | AMD Zen 2 | vs | AMD Zen 2 | |
Market | Desktop | vs | Desktop | |
Memory Support | DDR4 | vs | DDR4 | |
Codename | Zen 2 | vs | Zen 2 | |
Release Date | Mar 2019 | vs | Dec 2019 |
Cores
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cores | 6 | vs | 8 | |
Threads | 12 | vs | 16 | |
SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 | |
Integrated Graphics | No | vs | No |
Cache
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
L1 Cache | 96K (per core) | vs | 96K (per core) | |
L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | vs | 512K (per core) | |
L3 Cache | 16MB (shared) | vs | 32MB |
Physical
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | vs | AMD Socket AM4 | |
Max Case Temp | unknown | vs | unknown | |
Package | vs | |||
Die Size | unknown | vs | unknown | |
Process | 7 nm | vs | 7 nm |
Performance
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cpu Frequency | 3600 MHz | vs | 3600 MHz | |
Turbo Clock | 4400 MHz | vs | 4400 MHz | |
Base Clock | 100 MHz | vs | 100 MHz | |
Voltage | variable | vs | variable | |
TDP | 65 W | vs | 65 W |
-
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
4928 points
-
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
4928 points
Points — higher is better
-
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
29514 points
-
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
39352 points
Points — higher is better
points — higher is better
points — higher is better
VS | ||
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | Intel Core i7-11800H |
VS | ||
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | Intel Core i7-11700F |
VS | ||
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | Intel Core i5-12600K |
VS | ||
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | Intel Core i5-12600KF |
VS | ||
Intel Core i7-12700K | Intel Core i7-12700KF |
VS | ||
Intel Core i7-12700KF | Intel Core i9-12900K |
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
Compare AMD Ryzen 7 3700X vs AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
AMD Ryzen 7 3700x | AMD Ryzen 7 5700g | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Both processors from AMD | |||||||||||
Two CPUs belong to the same class Ryzen | Ryzen 7 | ||||||||||
Two processors appeared at the same time | |||||||||||
Two models belong to the table type | |||||||||||
both models operate on the Socket AM4 | processors have similarities in the Kol-VADS: 8 nuclei | ||||||||||
Both models have 16 threads | |||||||||||
These CPUs have a built-in overclocking capability | |||||||||||
The process technology of these processor models is 7 nm | |||||||||||
The number of transistors coincides in these processors: 19200 million | |||||||||||
Thermal power of the two processors reaches 65 WATT | |||||||||||
RAM for both CPUs 2 | |||||||||||
Two processor models support PCIe version 4.0 | |||||||||||
The presented processors can use the same number of PCI Express channels — 16 | |||||||||||
Two models support the 64 -bit set of commands | |||||||||||
CSH of level L1 512 kilobytes |
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | AMD Ryzen 7 5700G |
---|---|
The nucleus architecture of the Ryzen 7 3700X processor is called Matisse | The nucleus architecture at the Ryzen processor 7 5700G is called CEZANNE | Ryzen 7 3700X Encomes, 3600 MHz versus 3800 MHz versus 3800 MHz versus 3800 MHz versus 3800 MHz vs. strongly outperforms in terms of clock frequency, 3800 MHz versus 3600 MHz |
Ryzen 7 3700X does not lose much in terms of auto overclocking, 4400 MHz versus 4600 MHz for competitor | Ryzen 7 5700G does not benefit much in terms of auto-overclocking, 4600 MHz compared to 4400 MHz for the competitor Ryzen 7 3700X |
The size of the third cache in the Ryzen 7 3700X CPU is significantly larger compared to 5 702 7 Ryzen02 KB | Ryzen 7 5700G L3 cache size is much less compared to Ryzen 7 3700X and equals 16384 Kilobytes |
Comparison of instructions and technologies
Technology or instruction name | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | AMD Ryzen 7 5700G | Short description |
---|---|---|---|
Precision Boost | AMD self-overclocking technology.![]() |
Name of technology or instruction | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | AMD Ryzen 7 5700G | Short description |
---|---|---|---|
MMX (Multimedia Extensions) | Multimedia extensions. | ||
SSE (Streaming SIMD Extensions) | Streaming SIMD processor extension. | ||
SSE2 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 2) | Streaming SIMD Processor Extension 2. | ||
SSE3 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 3) | Processor Streaming SIMD Extension 3. | ||
SSSE3 (Supplemental Streaming SIMD Extension 3) | Additional SIMD extensions for streaming 3.![]() |
||
SSE4 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 4) | Processor Streaming SIMD Extension 4. | ||
AES (Intel Advanced Encryption Standard New Instructions) | Command set extension. | ||
AVX (Advanced Vector Extensions) | Command set extension. | ||
F16C (16-bit Floating-Point conversion) | 16-bit floating point conversion. | ||
FMA3 (Fused Multiply-Add 3) | Multiply Add with Round One (FMA3). | ||
SSE4A (Streaming SIMD Extensions 4A) | Processor Streaming SIMD 4A Extension. | ||
AVX 2 (Advanced Vector Extensions 2) | Command extension 2.![]() |
||
BMI1 (Bit manipulation instructions 1) | BMI1 bit control command set. | ||
AMD64 | 64-bit microprocessor architecture developed by AMD. |
Name of technology or instruction | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | AMD Ryzen 7 5700G | Short description |
---|---|---|---|
SMAP (Supervisor Mode Access Prevention) | Supervisor mode access prevention. | ||
SMEP (Supervisor Mode Execution Prevention) | Prevent execution in supervisor mode. | ||
EVP (Enhanced Virus Protection) | Improved virus protection.![]() |
Technology or instruction name | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | AMD Ryzen 7 5700G | Short description |
---|---|---|---|
AMD-V | AMD-V Virtualization Technology. |
Benchmarks
Overall performance rating
The rating is calculated according to the formula, taking into account all indicators: test results of all benchmarks, automatic overclocking technologies, number of cores and threads, structure, base frequency, instructions, socket, temperature data, release year, and much more. The results of the overall ranking showed that the Ryzen 7 5700G processor is not much superior to its rival Ryzen 7 3700X. The Ryzen 7 3700X processor itself was able to score 27190.85 points, slightly losing to the competitor.
PassMark CPU Mark
The benchmark includes a large set of tests to evaluate the performance of personal computers, including the CPU. Among them are floating point calculations, integer calculations, encryption, extended instruction checking, game physics calculations, compression, multi-threaded and single-threaded tests. It is also possible to compare the results with other configurations in a common database. Almost all of our processors have been tested in PassMark. This is perhaps the most famous benchmark on the Internet. The Performance Test showed slightly better performance for the Ryzen 7 5700G (23646 points) over the Ryzen 7 3700X (22792 points). The Ryzen 7 3700X trails marginally in this test.
Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Single-threaded test
It is possible to test multi-processor systems. The main performance testing mode is multi-level reflections, spatial light sources, working with light, simulated global illumination, photorealistic rendering of a 3D scene, and procedural shaders. Single — in its work uses only one thread for rendering and one core. This benchmark for testing video cards and processors is already outdated today. Works in operating systems Windows, Mac OS X. MAXON appeared, and is based on the 3D editor Cinema 4D. The method of geometric optics is used — ray tracing.
Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Multi-thread test
Multi-Core version is another testing method in Cinebench R10, which uses multi-thread and multi-core testing method. Please note that the number of threads in this version is limited to sixteen.
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test
Multi-threaded version of the CINEBENCH R11.5 test, it has the ability to load the processor to the full, including all cores and threads. It differs from previous versions, 64 threads will be involved here. Testing the Ryzen 7 5700G in the Cinebench 11.5 benchmark showed a result of 26.67 points, slightly ahead of its competitor. At this time, the Ryzen 7 3700X gets its 23.2 points, which fully justifies their close positions in the ranking.
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
Excellent fully functional Cinebench version R11. 5 from Maxon. His tests are still relevant today. The tests continue to use the ray tracing process, rendering a detailed 3D room with many crystalline and translucent and glass spheres. In this Single-Core variant, tests happen by using one core and one thread. The test metrics are the «frames per second» value. Testing in single-threaded mode of the Ryzen 7 5700G processor in Cinebench 11.5 Single-Core showed that with a score of 2.76 points, it is not far ahead of the competitor. But the Ryzen 7 3700X itself scored 2.3 points in this test.
Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test
Multi Core Cinebench R15 version — tests your build to the fullest, showing what it can do. All cores and threads of the processor are involved in the process of rendering highly detailed 3D objects. It is ideal for modern multi-threaded CPUs from AMD and Intel. it can use 256 threads. The Ryzen 7 5700G, with a score of 2320.58, doesn’t outperform much in the Cinebench r15 multi-thread benchmark. Slightly behind it is the Ryzen 7 3700X, gaining 2092 points.
Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
Cinebench Release 15 is the most up-to-date benchmark from the Finnish team Maxon. A complex 3D scene is rendered with many light sources, detailed objects and reflections. It produces a system test: both processors and video cards. For processors, the result of the calculation will be the number of PTS points, and for video cards, the number of frames per second. FPS. In this version of the Single Core program, one thread is used for rendering. Ryzen 7 5700G single-threaded Cinebench R15 performance test scores 292.42 points. Compared to it, its Ryzen 7 3700X competitor fails this test with a score of 204.
Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test
This is already a 64-bit multi-threaded Geekbench 4 test. It is the wide cross-platform support for different OS and devices that makes Geekbench tests the most valuable now. In Geekbench 4 64-bit multi-core, the Ryzen 7 5700G received a score of 49036. 12, which is significantly higher than the Ryzen 7 3700X. In this test, the Ryzen 7 3700X gets an extremely low score of 36561 compared to the Ryzen 7 5700G.
Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
The latest single-threaded version of Geekbench 4 for testing desktops and laptops. For the first time in this version of the tester, mobile devices running Android and iOS are also supported. The program, like its earlier versions, runs on OS: Windows, Mac OS, Linux. The Single-Core check uses one processor thread. Ryzen 7 5700G scores higher in Geekbench 4.0 single thread test with a score of 8832.89points. But its competitor Ryzen 7 3700X is doing much worse — 5677 points.
Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Multi-thread test
Multi-Thread benchmark Geekbench 3 — allows you to arrange a powerful synthetic test of your build and show how productive your OS is.
Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Single-threaded test
Single Core version of the benchmark uses no more than one processor core and one thread. Cross-platform Geekbench is usually used to test the system under Mac, but it can run on both Windows and Linux. The basic purpose is to test the performance of processors.
Geekbench 2
Today there are more recent options: the fifth and fourth. On our site you can find about 200 processor models that have test results in this program. An outdated version of the Geekbench 2 benchmark.
X264 HD 4.0 Pass 1
This is a practical test of processor performance by transcoding HD files to the new H.264 format, the so-called MPEG 4 x264 codec. The number of frames processed per second is the result of the test. This is the most appropriate test for multi-core and multi-thread processors. This test is faster than Pass 2, as it renders at a constant speed. The MPEG 4 video processing speed of the Ryzen 7 5700G is significantly higher at 628.5 FPS. But the Ryzen 7 3700X did a poor job of 270 FPS.
X264 HD 4.0 Pass 2
This is a slightly different, slower test based on video file compression. The same MPEG4 x264 codec is used, but the processing is already done at a variable rate. The end result is also determined by frames per second. You need to understand that a real task is being carried out, and the x264 codec is used in a large number of encoders. The result is better video quality. This means that the test results really evaluate the effectiveness of the platform. When measuring the speed of video file compression by the Ryzen 7 5700G processor in mpeg4 format, the result was 146.92 fps. Its rival Ryzen 7 3700X showed a much lower video encoding rate compared to it — 115 FPS.
3DMark06 CPU
Based on DirectX 9.0 by the Finnish company Futuremark. Benchmark program for testing video system, and CPU. This test is often used by overclockers and fans of overclocking processors and gamers. CPUs are tested in two ways: the game AI calculates the pathfinding, and the second test simulates the system using PhysX. The Ryzen 7 5700G performs significantly faster in the Pathfinding and Game Physics tests and scores 38105.