Crucial P1 vs Samsung 970 EVO: Complete comparison!
Table of Contents
Crucial P1 SSDs are available at an affordable price, then why buyers prefer Samsung SSDs? Obliviously, this question will be rolling in your mind. There may be a reason for investing in Samsung 970 SSDs. Want to compare the Crucial P1 and Samsung 970 EVO? I’m here to assist you with the same. Investing a few minutes to read the whole article, will help to compare the features, price, and other information for both NVMe SSDs.
After comparing both the SSDs, it’s pretty clear that Samsung 970 EVO is the “Winner”. Though the price is less for Crucial P1 compared to Samsung 970 EVO, considering the features Samsung 970 EVO is the more reliable choice. Check out the difference for the NVMe SSDs to gain a better understanding.
To have the best choice, you must have a better understanding of the Product. Crucial and Samsung are competitive brands, before investing in any of them it’s good to recognize more reliable and durable SSD. Let’s explore the necessary information to determine the best NVMe SSD to invest in.
1.
Storage Space
Considering storage, Samsung 970 EVO includes more variants compared to Crucial P1 NVMe SSDs. Have a look at variants for both SSDs.
Crucial P1: 500GB/1TB/ 2TB
Samsung 970 EVO: 250GB/500GB/ 1TB/ 2TB
Now, if you’re intending to have extra storage then, you know the better choice. It’s Samsung 970 EVO, you can obtain up to 2TB Storage Space which is one of the best storages in the NVMe SSDs category.
Note: The Read/Write speed increases with higher variants, investing in a higher variant will get you increased R/W speed. Let’s explore the Read/Write for each variant of Crucial P1 and Samsung 970 EVO NVMe SSDs.
2.
Sequential Read/Write Speed (Theoretical)
Let’s see and compare the sequential read/write speeds of both the SSDs. These speeds are promised by the companies.
We will come to the actual benchmarks of the same further.
Read/Write Speed of Crucial P1
| Variant | Seq. Read Speed | Seq. Write Speed |
|---|---|---|
| 500 GB | 1900 MB/s | 950 MB/s |
| 1 TB | 2000 MB/s | 1900 MB/s |
| 2 TB | 2000 MB/s | 1750 MB/s |
Read/Write Speed of Samsung 970 EVO
| Variant | Seq. Read Speed | Seq. Write Speed |
|---|---|---|
| 250 GB | 3400 MB/s | 1500 MB/s |
| 500 GB | 3400 MB/s | 2300 MB/s |
| 1 TB | 3400 MB/s | 2500 MB/s |
| 2 TB | 3500 MB/s | 2500 MB/s |
3.
Input/Output Operations Per Second (4KB Random )
Samsung 970 EVO delivers 2x Random IOPS compared to Crucial P1. Each variant of the Samsung 970 NVMe SSD is faster compared to Crucial P1 NVMe SSDs. Smart Buyers would intend to acquire better speed investing a bit more on Samsung NVMe SSDs. Though Crucial P1 SSDs are preferred by buyers, it’s not a bad choice but you have a better option available in the market.
Random IOPS R/W Speed of Crucial P1 (Theoretical)
| Variant | Read IOPS | Write IOPS |
|---|---|---|
| 500 GB | 90,000 | 220,000 |
| 1 TB | 170,000 | 240,000 |
| 2 TB | 250,000 | 250,000 |
Random IOPS R/W Speed of Samsung 970 EVO NVMe SSD
| Variant | Read IOPS | Write IOPS |
|---|---|---|
| 250 GB | 200,000 | 350,000 |
| 500 GB | 370,000 | 450,000 |
| 1 TB | 500,000 | 450,000 |
| 2 TB | 500,000 | 480,000 |
4.
Benchmark Scores
Note: These are average benchmarks with 100% empty space in the 1TB version of both the SSD. The tests were done on an i7 8th generation processor with 3200 MHz RAM. The actual speeds may vary depending on your system configurations.
Crucial P1 (1 TB) Benchmark Scores
| Variant | Seq. Read | Seq. Write | 4K Read | 4K Write |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 TB | 1483 MB/s | 1361 MB/s | 57.6 MB/s | 140 MB/s |
Samsung 970 EVO Benchmark Scores
| Variant | Seq. Read | Seq. Write | 4K Read | 4K Write |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 TB | 2330 MB/s | 2118 MB/s | 60. 5 MB/s |
145 MB/s |
The SAMSUNG 970 Evo is again winning the war when tested under tough practical situations. The SSD performed well both in sequential and random data read/write operations.
5.
SSD Endurance Terabytes Written
Crucial P1 TBW (Tera-bytes Written)
| Variant | TBW |
|---|---|
| 500 GB | 100 TBW |
| 1 TB | 200 TBW |
| 2 TB | 400 TBW |
Samsung 970 EVO TBW (Tera-bytes Written)
| Variant | TBW |
|---|---|
| 250 GB | 150 TBW |
| 500 GB | 300 TBW |
| 1 TB | 600 TBW |
| 2 TB | 1200 TBW |
What is TBW? TBW stands for Terabytes Written which helps to indicate the Lifespan of an NVMe SSD.
More, Terabytes Written indicates better durability. After, comparing TBW of each variant, the result is the same. SAMSUNG is again beating Crucial. This may make your decision much more straightforward.
6.
Price Difference
Note: The stated price for Samsung 970 EVO may differ depending on market price and demand, nowadays there is more demand for the latest model of Samsung 970 EVO Plus SSD. Check out the blog Samsung 970 EVO vs 970 EVO Plus for detailed information on both the popular Samsung NVMe SSDs.
Check the price of crucial p1
check the price of samsung 970 evo
7.
Other Differences
1.
Bus Type/Form Factor
The form factor (interface) for both NVMe SSDs is M.2. The interface is PCIe 3.0 x4. and the protocol is NVMe 1.3.
2. NAND Type
Crucial P1 NVMe SSD is based on Micron 64 Layer 3D QLC NAND.
This might be the reason why P1 comes with less TBW as compared to the 970 Evo.
Samsung 970 EVO NVMe SSD is based on Samsung 3D TLC V-NAND. This one also has 64 layers of NAND.
3.
Controller Type
Crucial P1 SSDs include Silicon Motion SM2263 controller which has two cores and 4-Channels.
The Samsung 970 EVO SSDs include its own Samsung’s Phoenix Penta-Core, 4-Channel Controller.
If we compare both, the SAMSUNG Phoenix is much more powerful than the SM2263. This is one of the main reasons why 970 EVO is beating the P1 everywhere.
4.
DRAM
Both the NVMe SSDs include different Cache Storages depending on Variants. Check out the DRAM for each variant of Crucial P1 and Samsung 970 EVO SSDs.
Crucial P1 DRAM (Cache Type)
| Variant | DRAM Type and Size |
|---|---|
| Crucial P1 500GB | 512MB DDR3 |
| Crucial P1 1TB | 1GB DDR3 |
| Crucial P1 2TB | 2GB DDR4 |
SAMSUNG 970 Evo DRAM (Cache Type)
| Variant | DRAM Type and Size |
|---|---|
| Samsung 970 EVO 500 | 512MB LPDDR4 |
| Samsung 970 EVO 1TB | 1GB LPDDR4 |
| Samsung 970 EVO 2TB | 2GB LPDDR4 |
What is the warranty period for these SSDs?
One of the common factors for both the Crucial P1 and Samsung 970 EVO is Warranty.
Both the brands offer 5 Years for the warranty to buyers.
Software for SSD Routine Health Check-up
You have to rely on compatible SSD software to have a routine health check-up for SSDs. Both Crucial and Samsung brands have their SSD-based software which helps users to perform the below-stated tasks.
- Check New Firmware Updates
- Perform Secure Erase
- Fix Minor Bugs
- Check System temperature
- Gain Drive Details
- Disk Test
- S.M.A.R.T Diagnostic
- Boost up the R/W speed
Download: SAMSUNG MAGICIAN SOFTWARE
Download: CRUCIAL SOFTWARE EXECUTIVE
What are my Views on both (Which one should you buy?)
I would suggest you invest in Samsung 970 EVO NVMe SSDs because it’s a more durable and reliable SSD compared to Crucial P1 SSDs. You can obtain better Read/Write speed, more TBW (Terabytes Written) Though, the price is a bit more compared to Crucial P1 NVMe SSDs but it’s a good choice to invest in.
However, the P1 is also a good option for the people who are good with lesser read/write speeds. The cache storage and controller is good in Crucial P1. So, you will not regret investing in it. But, if you ask me to choose between the both, I would go with the SAMSUNG 970 Evo.
Conclusion
I hope now you will be able to pick the right one for you. There is no question with the durability and cache of both these products. But, if we talk about the practical applications, 970 Evo is going to give you great results.
Thanks for reading!!
Crucial P1 vs Samsung SSD 970 EVO
In the product groups of 2.5-inch SSD hard disks and M.2 plug-in cards with SATA connection, Crucial and Samsung have long been competing for the favour of customers. Among the NVMe SSD drives, Crucial had until recently no comparable product to the popular Samsung SSD 970 EVO in its range. But now the Crucial P1 has appeared on the market to compete with the M.2 SSD from Samsung.
How do the two storage drives differ in detail? How do the Crucial P1 and the Samsung SSD 970 EVO compare?
— ADS —
Advantages Crucial P1 compared to Samsung SSD 970 EVO
- Lower price
- Lower costs per gigabyte
- Sufficient performance
Advantages Samsung SSD 970 EVO compared to Crucial P1
- Better performance in reading and writing
- Capacities from 250 GB
- Higher TBW values
find best buy SSD on eBay.com
shop worldwide on | Amazon.com #ad | computeruniverse.net | eBay.com | AliExpress.com |
Differences of Crucial P1 and Samsung SSD 970 EVO
Form factor and interface
The Crucial P1 and the Samsung SSD 970 EVO are manufactured exclusively in the M.2 2280 form factor, which results in the standardized external dimensions of 22 millimeters in width and 80 millimeters in length. The interface used for the two NVMe SSD hard disks is the third-generation PCIe interface with the four lanes.
While Samsung uses a 3-bit flash memory in the SSD 970 EVO series, Crucial uses the so-called QLC NAND in the P1 series, which can hold up to 4 bits of data per cell and should therefore be more cost-effective for the same capacity.
Crucial P1 Series (Source: Crucial)
Capacity and performance
The Crucial P1 starts with a memory size of 500 GB. The Samsung SSD 970 EVO, on the other hand, is already available from 250 GB. With an M.2 SSD with 2 TB capacity, the two manufacturers round off their offer upwards. In terms of performance, the differences between the Crucial P1 and the Samsung SSD 970 EVO become apparent despite the same interface. Thus, the former achieves a maximum of 2,000 MB/s in sequential reading compared to the up to 3,500 MB/s with the Samsung SSD. Also, in sequential writing, Crucial’s P1 with a maximum of 1,750 MB/s is also the shorter of the 2,500 MB/s of the 970 EVO. In both series, the smaller versions are also noticeably slower in some cases.
Guarantee and equipment
The NVMe SSDs from Crucial and Samsung are on a par with the very customer-friendly 5 years in terms of the warranty period.
Nevertheless, the Samsung SSD 970 EVO allows a much higher amount of data to be written to the drive during the same period before warranty claims can no longer be made. For example, the TBW value of Samsung’s SSD is three times the value of the Crucial P1 in the 500 GB version and even six times the value in the 2 TB version. Crucial includes a license for the cloning software Acronis True Image with its SSD. The 970 EVO, like the other SSDs from Samsung, is compatible with the in-house applications for data transfer and drive management.
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Series (Source: Samsung)
Conclusion SSD comparison – Crucial P1 and Samsung SSD 970 EVO differences
Although the Crucial P1 and the Samsung SSD 970 EVO are similar in the interface used and partly in the memory sizes offered, there are still differences in the target group that should be addressed with the respective drive. Due to the significantly lower price, the NVMe SSD from Crucial is primarily aimed at the thrifty buyers, who however expect a higher performance than would be possible with a SATA SSD.
The M.2 SSD from Samsung on the other hand convinces with its better performance in reading and writing, which can also satisfy professional users.
Both the Crucial P1 and the Samsung SSD 970 EVO offer a very good price-performance ratio. Thus, the two SSD models are worth a purchase recommendation depending on the personal specifications as well as the individual usage profile.
find best buy SSD on eBay.com
shop worldwide on | Amazon.com #ad | computeruniverse.net | eBay.com | AliExpress.com |
Crucial P1 vs Samsung SSD 970 EVO – Technical data comparison differences
| product | Crucial P1 | Samsung SSD 970 EVO |
| form factor | M.2 2280 SSD | M.2 2280 SSD |
| interface | PCIe Gen 3.0 x4, NVMe 1.3 | PCIe Gen 3.0 x4, NVMe 1.3 |
| capacity | 500 GB 1 TB 2 TB |
250 GB 500 GB 1 TB 2 TB |
| NAND type | 3D 4-bit QLC | 3D 3-bit TLC |
| sequential read | 1,900 MB/s (500 GB) 2,000 MB/s (1 TB, 2 TB) |
3,400 MB/s (250 GB, 500 GB, 1 TB) 3,500 MB/s (2 TB) |
| sequential write | 950 MB/s (500 GB) 1,700 MB/s (1 TB) 1,750 MB/s (2 TB) |
1,500 MB/s (250 GB) 2,300 MB/s (500 GB) 2,500 MB/s (1 TB, 2 TB) |
| reliability (MTTF) | 1. 5 million hours |
1.5 million hours |
| TBW | 100 TB (500 GB) 200 TB (1 TB, 2 TB) |
150 TB (250 GB) 300 TB (500 GB) 600 TB (1 TB) 1,200 TB (2 TB) |
| warranty | 5 years limited | 5 years limited |
crucial ssdsamsung ssdssd comparisonssd differencesssd pros and cons
|
3DNews Technologies and IT market. News RAM modules, memory cards, flash drives… The Samsung 970 EVO Plus is indispensable… The most interesting in the reviews
08/27/2021 [00:35], Nikolai Khizhnyak Following Western Digital, Samsung was caught replacing components in solid state drives. Attention to the issue was attracted by the Trendy player YouTube channel from Asia, which found two different versions of NVMe drives on sale 970 EVO Plus with a capacity of 1 TB and conducted a video review of them.
Image source: Samsung The channel compared two variants of the Samsung 970 EVO Plus. The original version of the drive, which has the part number MZVLB1T0HBLR, was released in April 2021. It is equipped with a Phoenix S4LR020 controller and 96-layer TLC 3D NAND flash memory marked K9DUGY8J5B-DCK0. The new version of the SSD, which has recently appeared on sale, has a different model number MZVL21T0HBLU, is equipped with an Elpis S4LV003 controller and is equipped with TLC 3D NAND flash memory marked K9DUGY8J5B-CCK0. 970 EVO Plus: old — left, new — right (Images here and below: 潮玩客 YouTube)
970 EVO Plus: top — old, bottom — new right The main difference between the versions was the controller. The Elpis chip migrated to the new version of the 970 EVO Plus from the younger and more productive Samsung 980 PRO series of drives, and it is focused on the PCIe 4.0 x4 interface. Therefore, support for PCIe 3.0 x4 in the new version 970 EVO Plus is implemented thanks to backward compatibility, and the PCIe 4. 970 EVO Plus: old on top, new on bottom The memory in the new version of the drive is also 96-layer TLC 3D NAND, but, apparently, uses a different package. An additional difference between the 970 EVO Plus versions is the firmware. The original drive has 2B2QEXM7 firmware, the new revision has 3B2QEXM7. Comparative tests of both versions show mixed results. For example, the new revision of the drive with the Elpis controller shows higher performance in the CrystalDiskMark and AS SSD benchmarks. 970 EVO Plus: old left, new right RND4K Q1T1 single stream random read speed difference is higher for the new drive — 82 MB/s versus 56 MB/s for the old version. The AS SSD test also indicates that the new version delivers faster 4K block random reads, but also higher latencies. 970 EVO Plus old left, new right 970 EVO Plus old left, new right 970 EVO Plus old top, new bottom Another aspect is the HD Tune Pro linear recording test. 970 EVO Plus: old left, new right In practice, the linear recording speed will depend on the size of the file being transferred. Tests of two versions of drives 970 EVO Plus were carried out when writing files of 156 GB. In this case, both versions of the SSD cope with the task in the same time. When transferring even larger files, the old version of the drive will certainly take the lead. But with a file size of less than 115 GB, the new version will be noticeably faster. Reviewers also noticed that the new version of the drive with the Elpis controller heats up a little more during operation. In today’s realities of semiconductor shortages, replacing components in an SSD is quite common. And as long as this fact does not have a negative impact on performance and is invisible to the end user, this usually does not create a problem. However, there are cases when manufacturers noticeably degrade the performance of their SSDs. Data sheet for 970 EVO Plus series: left — old, right — new Fortunately, in the case of 970 EVO Plus, we can talk about some improvement in performance due to the use of a newer controller and a more beneficial SLC caching strategy for average users. However, if someone likes the old version of the drive, then it will not be difficult to distinguish it. The old and new versions of the 970 EVO Plus are sold in different packages and have different part numbers. Source:
If you notice an error, select it with the mouse and press CTRL+ENTER. |
0 mode is hardware-locked. 
The old version starts at 1750 MB/s and drops to 1500 MB/s after the dedicated 42 GB SLC cache is full. The new version of the drive starts at a write speed of 2500 MB / s and maintains it until about 115 GB of information is written, which indicates an increased amount of SLC cache. However, after that, performance sags to 800 MB / s. Apparently, the new version of the drive uses NAND crystals with a higher capacity, which reduces the degree of parallelism of the flash memory array. 
