UHD Graphics 750 [in 1 benchmark]
UHD Graphics 750
Buy
- Interface Ring Bus
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory System Shared
- Memory type System Shared
- Memory clock speed System Shared
- Maximum resolution
Summary
Intel started UHD Graphics 750 sales 30 March 2021. This is Generation 12.1 architecture desktop card based on 14 nm+++ manufacturing process and primarily aimed at gamers.
Compatibility-wise, this is an integrated video card. No additional power connector is required, and power consumption is at 15 Watt.
It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at
5.86%
of a leader’s which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti.
UHD
Graphics 750
vs
GeForce RTX
3090 Ti
General info
Of UHD Graphics 750’s architecture, market segment and release date.
| Place in performance rating | 547 | |
| Value for money | 0.59 | |
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) | |
| GPU code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | |
| Market segment | Desktop | |
| Release date | 30 March 2021 (1 year ago) | |
| Current price | $1314 | of 49999 (A100 SXM4) |
Value for money
To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.
- 0
- 50
- 100
Technical specs
UHD Graphics 750’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed.
These parameters indirectly speak of UHD Graphics 750’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 256 | of 18432 (AD102) |
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | of 2903 (Radeon Pro W6600) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm+++ | of 4 (GeForce RTX 4080 Ti) |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 15 Watt | of 900 (Tesla S2050) |
| Texture fill rate | 20.80 | of 939.8 (h200 SXM5) |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on UHD Graphics 750’s compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it’s interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | Ring Bus | |
| Width | IGP |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed on UHD Graphics 750: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don’t have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | of 128 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | of 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | of 21000 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on UHD Graphics 750. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
| Display Connectors | No outputs |
API support
APIs supported by UHD Graphics 750, sometimes including their particular versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2 |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance of UHD Graphics 750. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
UHD Graphics 750
5.86
- Passmark
Passmark
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 26%
UHD Graphics 750
1733
Game benchmarks
Let’s see how good UHD Graphics 750 is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.
Average FPS
Popular games
Relative perfomance
Overall UHD Graphics 750 performance compared to nearest competitors among desktop video cards.
AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
102.9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
101.37
ATI Radeon HD 5830
100
Intel UHD Graphics 750
100
AMD Radeon R9 M375X
99.32
AMD Radeon HD 7750
98.63
ATI Radeon HD 5770
98.29
Similar GPUs
Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
Radeon RX
570X
Compare
Radeon
550X
Compare
Radeon
540
Compare
Radeon Vega
6
Compare
Radeon RX
550X
Compare
Radeon RX
560X
Compare
Recommended processors
These processors are most commonly used with UHD Graphics 750 according to our statistics.
Core i5
11600K
15.9%
Core i5
11500
13.3%
Core i7
11700K
11%
Core i7
11700
8.7%
Core i5
11600
7.9%
Core i5
11400
2.9%
Core i9
11900K
2.8%
Core i3
1115G4
2.
7%
Core i5
1035G1
1.6%
Core i5
1135G7
1.4%
User rating
Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about UHD Graphics 750, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
Intel UHD 750 (Rocket Lake) Review
UHD 750 Overview:
With the recent release of Intel’s 11th-gen Rocket Lake CPUs comes the accompanying integrated GPU, the UHD 750. With it Intel replaces Comet Lake’s UHD 630 graphics, and attempts to improve on the design for better graphical performance.
Integrated graphics come standard with every Intel processor, from the mid-tier 11400 to the top-of-the-line 11900K.
The only exception to this is Intel’s “F” line of processors like the 11400F, which are identical to their non-F counterparts aside from their lack of integrated graphics.
Integrated graphics have grown in popularity over the years for a number of reasons. They allow you to build a PC without the added cost of a discrete graphics card, making computers more affordable. Even less demanding games can be run at reasonable framerates using solely integrated graphics, allowing games like Minecraft to reach a much wider audience.
Intel’s i5-11600K processor, which includes UHD 750 integrated graphics
UHD 750 Benchmarks
The best metric of performance for an integrated GPU is in-game benchmarks. This is the primary way in which integrated graphics improve from generation to generation; games are able to perform better without a graphics card.
With this in mind, we’ve benchmarked the UHD 750 graphics in several games, ranging from low-demand titles like VALORANT to high-demand GPU-bound games such as PUBG.
How We Tested
For our benchmarks we used Intel’s i5-11600K, but results should be roughly the same with any 11th-gen Intel processor. All Rocket Lake CPUs include the same exact GPU, which will bottleneck even the lowest-performing 11th-gen processor in any game. In short, the maximum possible framerate is determined solely by the UHD 750 graphics, regardless of what CPU is benchmarked.
In our benchmarks, we only tested relevant settings in 1080p. When using integrated graphics you’ll most likely be running games at the lowest possible setting to maximize performance, so we only listed higher settings if they were able to be run at 60+ FPS.
Lastly, all benchmarks were recorded with an uncapped (unlimited) framerate. Expect slightly better performance with a capped framerate. For example, if a game averaged 58FPS in benchmarks, you may be able to get 60 steadily if you cap your frames at 60 per second).
UHD 750 Benchmarks
Benchmark results for the UHD 750 integrated graphics
- Fortnite Battle Royale: 69FPS (Performance Mode)
- VALORANT: 116FPS (Low), 95FPS (Medium), 87FPS (High)
- Apex Legends: 52FPS (Lowest)
- PUBG: 35 (Very Low)
UHD 750 vs.
Radeon Vega Graphics
UHD 750’s competition is currently AMD’s Vega graphics, found most recently in the Ryzen 5 5600G and Ryzen 7 5700G. How does Intel compare to AMD in this regard?
In a recent benchmark by Testing Games, which compared performance of the 7-core, 1900MHz GPU-equipped 5600G with the i5-11600K, the AMD APU won out by an average of nearly 60%.
| Game | UHD 750 FPS | Vega 7 FPS | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitman 3 | 18 | 35 | Vega +94% |
| Battlefield V | 30 | 48 | Vega +60% |
| GTA V | 57 | 89 | Vega +56% |
| Rainbow Six Siege | 64 | 95 | Vega +48% |
| Witcher 3 | 30 | 42 | Vega +40% |
Processor-wise, the i5-11600K and Ryzen 5 5600G are virtually identical. As such, the 5600G is an even better graphics-less option if you can find it at a similar price to the 11600K.
It’s worth mentioning that the Ryzen 7 5700G has an 8-core variation of Radeon’s Vega graphics with a 5% faster clock (Radeon doesn’t use uniform GPUs across same-generation APUs), allowing even faster performance. Thus, if you’re looking for the fastest-possible performance without a discrete GPU, the 5700G will perform the best.
UHD 750 Processors:
What this means for you:
Unfortunately some games are too much for any integrated GPU that’s currently available. Games like PUBG, Battlefield V, and Call of Duty: Warzone will struggle to run much faster than 30FPS because they simply demand a more powerful GPU.
On the other hand, we found that Intel’s new UHD 750 integrated graphics could run a wide range of games at 60 or more frames per second. Even more GPU-intensive games like Apex Legends were able to average close to 60.
Moreover, games like VALORANT and CS:GO can easily push past the 100FPS mark, and can run over 60 frames with ease, even at max settings.
This means that if you’re looking for a way to wait out the current GPU shortage, buying a Rocket Lake CPU with UHD 750 graphics may be a viable choice. Especially if you play well-optimized, CPU-heavy titles, you can game at 60 or more FPS without having to spend a massive chunk of money on a dedicated graphics card. When (or if) prices eventually drop, you can upgrade.
Of course, this will only work if you’re alright with running games at low settings in 1080p or lower. Some folks understandably like to play at max settings or high resolutions, and UHD 750 graphics simply won’t cut it for tasks like these.
Either way, UHD 750 is a significant step up from UHD 630. It enables the majority of games, and even a decent proportion of AAA titles, to be run at upwards of 60FPS, an impressive accomplishment for a GPU that comes as a complimentary add-on.
You can find some of our favorite Intel 11th-gen CPUs in our list of the best Intel CPUs for gaming.
ArtofPC is reader-supported.
We may earn a commission if you make a purchase through one of our affiliate links, but it won’t cost you anything. Thanks for your support!
Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and NVIDIA Quadro T1000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory.
Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s).
Intel UHD Graphics 750
Buy on Amazon
vs
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 3.
3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt - 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames): 11068 vs 3359
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps): 11068 vs 3359
| Launch date | 2021 vs 27 May 2019 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 vs 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 vs 3359 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000
- 4.7x more core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1300 MHz
- 3.4x more texture fill rate: 69.84 GTexel/s vs 20.
80 GTexel/s - 3x more pipelines: 768 vs 256
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 3.7x better performance in PassMark — G3D Mark: 6540 vs 1749
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark — G2D Mark: 451 vs 341
- 4.2x better performance in Geekbench — OpenCL: 32981 vs 7782
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9009 vs 2899
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3219
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9009 vs 2899
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3219
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1300 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 69. 84 GTexel/s vs 20.80 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 256 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 6540 vs 1749 |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 451 vs 341 |
| Geekbench — OpenCL | 32981 vs 7782 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 vs 2899 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 vs 2899 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps) |
3718 vs 3219 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
| PassMark — G3D Mark |
|
|
||
| PassMark — G2D Mark |
|
|
||
| Geekbench — OpenCL |
|
|
||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 1749 | 6540 |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 341 | 451 |
| Geekbench — OpenCL | 7782 | 32981 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
2899 | 9009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 3219 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2899 | 9009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3219 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 656 | |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
43.415 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 750 | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Turing |
| Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | TU117 |
| Launch date | 2021 | 27 May 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 550 | 304 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile Workstation |
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1455 MHz |
| Compute units | 32 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1395 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 166. 4 GFLOPS (1:4) |
69.84 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1331 GFLOPS (2:1) | 4.470 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 665.6 GFLOPS | 2.235 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 256 | 768 |
| Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | 46.56 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 20.80 GTexel/s | 69.84 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| DirectX | 12. 0 (12_1) |
12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 128 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 |
Overview of the Intel UHD Graphics 750
Description
Specifications
| Released | 2021 |
| Segment | integrated graphics core |
| Base frequency | 350 Mhz |
| Game frequency | — |
| Turbo frequency | 1300 Mhz |
| Tire | — |
| Memory size | dynamic, up to 64 gigabytes |
| Stream Processors | 256 |
| Compute modules | 32 |
| Texture blocks | 16 |
| Rasterizers | 8 |
| Architecture (core) | Intel Gen12. 1 |
| Process | 14nm |
| TDP | 15W |
Supported APIs, technologies: Vulkan 1.2, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL 4.6, DirectX 11, DirectX 12, DirectX 12.1, Shader Model 6.4
Supported operating systems: Windows 10-11 x86-x64, Linux x86-x64
B what processors are used: Core i5-11500T, Core i5-11500, Core i5-11600T, Core i5-11600, Core i5-11600K, Core i7-11700T, Core i7-11700, Core i7-11700K, Core i9-11900T, Core i9-11900, Core i9-11900K
Overview of the Intel UHD Graphics 750
The graphics core (GPU) Intel UHD Graphics 750 appeared in 2021 as part of the mid-budget and high-performance desktop (desktop) processors Core 11th generation (Rocket Lake). The GPU is made according to technological standards of 14nm and carries the Intel Gen 12.1 architecture, has a base frequency of 350 megahertz and a maximum of 1300 megahertz. The graphics core does not have its own video memory, but takes it from the RAM, which makes the graphics subsystem extremely dependent on the RAM frequency (the higher the frequency, the better the GPU performance).
The core is extremely sensitive to the dual-channel RAM mode (when there are two memory sticks of the same size and frequency) and shows significantly better performance in this mode compared to the single-channel mode. Intel UHD Graphics 750 is a low cost integrated GPU and will provide the minimum required performance (30fps+) in undemanding modern games such as DOTA2, CS:Source, CS:GO, World of Tanks at low graphics settings and 720p(1280*720) resolution. In modern demanding games: The Witcher 3, Red Dead Redemption 2, at 720p(1280*720) resolution and minimum graphics settings, the frame rate will be 20-25, with subsidence in the most difficult scenes up to 15. In older games like GTA V and Tomb Raider 2013, Intel UHD Graphics 750 will provide a comfortable amount of fps (40fps+) at low graphics settings.
Additional information:
1) To further increase performance in games, turn off the «vertical sync» option in the graphics settings.
2) If possible, use RAM in dual-channel mode (two identical strips), this will give the system additional performance.
Test Intel UHD Graphics 750 in games:
Table of processors equipped with Intel UHD Graphics 750 frequency characteristics of the video core.
| Model | Core | Cores/Threads | Frequency Turbo | Video core | Process | Frequency Base_Turbo |
| Core i9-11900K | Rocket Lake 14nm | 8/16 | 3. 5/5.3GHz |
UHD 750 | 14nm | 350-1300MHz |
| Core i9-11900 | Rocket Lake 14nm | 8/16 | 2.5/5.2GHz | UHD 750 | 14nm | 350-1300MHz |
| Core i9-11900T | Rocket Lake 14nm | 8/16 | 1.5/4.9GHz | UHD 750 | 14nm | 350-1300MHz |
| Core i7-11700K | Rocket Lake 14nm | 8/16 | 3.6/5.0GHz | UHD 750 | 14nm | 350-1300MHz |
| Core i7-11700 | Rocket Lake 14nm | 8/16 | 2.5/4.9GHz | UHD 750 | 14nm | 350-1300MHz |
| Core i7-11700T | Rocket Lake 14nm | 8/16 | 1.4/4.6GHz | UHD 750 | 14nm | 350-1300MHz |
| Core i5-11600K | Rocket Lake 14nm | 6/12 | 3. 9/4.9GHz |
UHD 750 | 14nm | 350-1300MHz |
| Core i5-11600 | Rocket Lake 14nm | 6/12 | 2.8/4.8GHz | UHD 750 | 14nm | 350-1300MHz |
| Core i5-11600T | Rocket Lake 14nm | 6/12 | 1.7/4.1GHz | UHD 750 | 14nm | 350-1300MHz |
| Core i5-11500 | Rocket Lake 14nm | 6/12 | 2.7/4.6GHz | UHD 750 | 14nm | 350-1300MHz |
| Core i5-11500T | Rocket Lake 14nm | 6/12 | 1.5/3.9GHz | UHD 750 | 14nm | 350-1300MHz |
performance overview and gaming performance tests
The UHD Graphics 750 graphics card was released by Intel, release date: 2021. The graphics card is designed for desktop computers and is built on the Generation 12.1 architecture, codenamed Rocket Lake GT1.
Core frequency — 300 MHz. The core frequency in Boost mode is 1300 MHz. Texturing speed — 20.80 GTexel/s. Number of shader processors — 256. Technological process — 14 nm. Power consumption (TDP) — 15 Watt.
Benchmarks
| PassMark G3D Mark |
|
|||||
| PassMark G2D Mark |
|
|||||
| Geekbench OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4. 0 Car Chase Offscreen |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Manhattan |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 T-Rex |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4. 0 Car Chase Offscreen |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Manhattan |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 T-Rex |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score |
|
000 Fps | Name | Meaning |
|---|---|
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 1749 |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 341 |
| Geekbench — OpenCL | 7782 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen |
2899 Frames |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan | 3219 Frames |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex | 11068 Frames |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen | 2899.000 Fps |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan | 3219.000 Fps |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex | 11068.000 Fps |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 656 |
Gaming performance
1. Days Gone (2021)
2. Mass Effect Legendary Edition (2021)
3 Resident Evil Village (2021)
4 Outriders (2021)
5.
Hitman 3 (2021)
6 Cyberpunk 2077 (2020)
7 Immortals Fenyx Rising (2020)
8 Crysis Remastered (2020)
9. Yakuza Like a Dragon (2020)
10 Assassin’s Creed Valhalla (2020)
11. Dirt 5 (2020)
12. FIFA 21 (2020)
13 Star Wars Squadrons (2020)
14 Mafia Definitive Edition (2020)
15. Serious Sam 4 (2020)
16. Death Stranding (2020)
17. F1 2020 (2020)
18 Strange Brigade (2018)
19. Gears Tactics (2020)
20. Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019)
21.
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019)
22. Borderlands 3 (2019)
23. Control (2019)
24. Anno 1800 (2019)
25. The Division 2 (2019)
26. Metro Exodus (2019))
27 Apex Legends (2019)
28. Battlefield V (2018)
29. Far Cry 5 (2018)
30. X-Plane 11.11 (2018)
31. Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)
32. Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
33. GTA V (2015)
Days Gone (2021)
| Low, 1280×720 | 22.70 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 12.40 |
| High, 1920×1080 | 10. 80 |
Mass Effect Legendary Edition (2021)
| Low, 1280×720 | 57.20 | |
| Ultra, 1920×1080 | 26.60 |
| Low, 1280×720 | 23.50 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 13.40 |
Outriders (2021)
| Low, 1280×720 | 29.10 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 23.10 |
| High, 1920×1080 | 17.40 |
| Ultra, 1920×1080 | 15.40 |
Hitman 3 (2021)
| Low, 1280×720 | 42.60 9 9000 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 16.00 |
| High, 1920×1080 | 13.10 |
| Ultra, 1920×1080 | 11.80 |
Cyberpunk 2077 (2020)
| Low, 1280×720 | 12. 40 |
Immortals Fenyx Riding (2020)
| Low, 1280×720 | 18.00 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | |
| High, 1920×1080 | 10.00 |
Crysis Remastered (2020)
| Low, 1280×720 | 33.20 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 9.67 |
Yakuza Like a Dragon (2020)
| LOW, 1280×720 | 29.20 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | .72 | HIIGH, 1920×1080 | 9000 9.30 |
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020)
| Low, 1280×720 | 20.00 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 11.00 |
| High, 1920×1080 | 9.00 |
Dirt 5 (2020)
| Low, 1280×720 | 23. 80 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | .509 | HIIGH, 1920×1080 | 7.70 |
FIFA 21 (2020)
| Low, 1280×720 | 99.50 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 47.30 |
| High, 1920×1080 | 42.70 |
| Ultra, 1920×1080 | 31.70 |
Star Wars Squadrons (2020)
| Low, 1280×720 | 74.40 | Medium, 1920×1080 | High, 1920×1080 | 24.00 |
| Ultra, 1920×1080 | 22.00 |
Mafia Definitive Edition (2020)
| Low, 1280×720 | 22.30 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 9. 84 |
Serious SAM 4 (2020)
| Low, 1280×720 | 58.60 | |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | ,0009000 | 000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 |
| High, 1920×1080 | 8.06 |
Death Stranding (2020)
| Low, 1280×720 | 27.40 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 15.10 |
| High, 1920×1080 | 14.90 |
F1 2020 (2020)
| Low, 1280×720 | 53.20 | Medium, 1920×1080 | High, 1920×1080 | 17.00 |
| Ultra, 1920×1080 | 10.70 |
Strange Brigade (2018)
| Low, 1280×720 | 51.10 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 19. 00 |
| High, 1920×1080 | 15.00 |
| Ultra, 1920×1080 | 13.20 |
GEARS TACTICS (2020)
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019)
| Low, 1280×720 | 28.60 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 13.40 | HIGH, 1920×1080 |
STAR Wars Jedi)
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 15.00 |
| High, 1920×1080 | 11.50 |
Borderlands 3 (2019)
| Low, 1280×720 | 26.10 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 11. 00 |
| HIGH, 1920×1080 | 6.29 |
Control (2019)
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 8.40 |
Anno 1800 (2019)
| Low, 1280×720 | 42.00 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 14.30 |
| High, 1920×1080 | 8.56 |
The Division 2 (2019)
| LOW, 1280×720 | 35.90 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | |
| 10.50 |
Metro Exodus (2019)
| Low, 1280×720 | 24.00 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 10.60 |
| High, 1920×1080 | 7.74 |
APEX Legends (2019)
| Low, 1280×720 | 59. 00 |
Medium, 1920×1080 |
| 15.70 | |
| Ultra, 1920×1080 | 15.70 |
Battlefield V (2018)
| Low, 1280×720 | 48.70 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 18.40 |
| High , 1920×1080 | 15.50 |
| Ultra, 1920×1080 | 14.50 |
| Low, 1280×720 | 31.00 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 14.00 |
| High, 1920×1080 | 13.00 |
| Ultra, 1920×1080 | 12.00 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)
| LOW, 1280×720 | 22.80 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 17.30 |
| HIGH, 1920×1080 |
FINAL FANTASY XV (2012)0771
| Low, 1280×720 | 23. 00 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 12.40 |
| High, 1920×1080 | 8.46 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
| Low, 1280×720 | 84.75 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 61.65 |
| High, 1920×1080 | 33.90 |
| Ultra, 1920×1080 |
GTA V (2015)
| Low, 1024×768 | 108.00 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 84.10 |
| High, 1920×1080 | 18.10 |
| Ultra, 1920×1080 | 7.43 |
List of processors with integrated graphics Intel UHD Graphics 750
| Processor | Type | Code name | Launch date | Number of cores | Max. frequency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-11500 | Desktop | Rocket Lake | 16 Mar 2021 | 6 | 4.60 GHz |
| Intel Core i5-11600 | Desktop | Rocket Lake | 16 Mar 2021 | 6 | 4.80 GHz |
| Intel Core i5-11600K | Desktop | Rocket Lake | 16 Mar 2021 | 6 | 4.90 GHz |
| Intel Core i7-11700 | Desktop | Rocket Lake | 16 Mar 2021 | 8 | 4. 90 GHz |
| Intel Core i7-11700K | Desktop | Rocket Lake | 16 Mar 2021 | 8 | 5.00 GHz |
| Intel Core i9-11900 | Desktop | Rocket Lake | 16 Mar 2021 | 8 | 5.20 GHz |
| Intel Core i9-11900K | Desktop | Rocket Lake | 16 Mar 2021 | 8 | 5.30 GHz |
| Intel Core i9-11900T | Desktop | Rocket Lake | 16 Mar 2021 | 8 | 4. 90 GHz |
| Intel Core i5-11500T | Desktop | Rocket Lake | 16 Mar 2021 | 6 | 3.90 GHz |
| Intel Core i9-11900H | Mobile | Tiger Lake | 11 May 2021 | 8 | 4.90 GHz |
| Intel Core i9-11900KB | Desktop | Tiger Lake | Q2’21 | 8 | 4.90 GHz |
| Intel Core i9-11950H | Mobile | Tiger Lake | 11 May 2021 | 8 | 5. 00 GHz |
| Intel Core i5-11600T | Desktop | Rocket Lake | 16 Mar 2021 | 4.10 GHz | |
| Intel Core i7-11700T | Desktop | Rocket Lake | 16 Mar 2021 | 4.60 GHz |
Features
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 |
| Codename | Rocket Lake GT1 |
| Production date | 2021 |
| Ranking | 550 |
| Type | Desktop |
| Boost core clock | 1300MHz |
| Number of Compute | 32 |
| Core frequency | 300MHz |
| Process | 14nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 166. 4GFLOPS (1:4) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1331 GFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 665.6GFLOPS |
| Number of shaders | 256 |
| Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s |
| Texturing Speed | 20.80 GTexel/s |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt |
| Video connectors | No outputs |
| DirectX | 12. 0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 |
| Vulcan | |
UHD Graphics 750 [in 1 benchmark]
UHD Graphics 750
- Ring Bus Interface
- Core clock
- Video memory size System Shared
- Memory type System Shared
- System Shared Memory Frequency
- Maximum resolution
Description
Intel started UHD Graphics 750 sales 30 March 2021. This is Generation 12.1 architecture desktop card based on 14 nm+++ manufacturing process and primarily aimed at gamers.
In terms of compatibility, this is an integrated graphics card.
An additional power cable is not required for connection, and the power consumption is 15 W.
It provides poor performance in tests and games at level
5.86%
from the leader, which is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti.
UHD
Graphics 750
or
GeForce RTX
3090 Ti
General information
Information about the type (desktop or laptop) and architecture of UHD Graphics 750, as well as when sales started and cost at the time.
- 0
- 50
- 100
Features
UHD Graphics 750’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. They indirectly speak of UHD Graphics 750’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
| Textory speed | 20.80 | of 939.8 (h200 SXM5) |
Compatibility and size
Information on UHD Graphics 750 compatibility with other computer components. Useful for example when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one. For desktop video cards, these are the interface and connection bus (compatibility with the motherboard), the physical dimensions of the video card (compatibility with the motherboard and case), additional power connectors (compatibility with the power supply).
| Interface | Ring Bus | |
| Thickness |
Parameters of the memory installed on UHD Graphics 750 — type, size, bus, frequency and bandwidth. For video cards built into the processor that do not have their own memory, a shared part of the RAM is used.
Video outputsTypes and number of video connectors present on UHD Graphics 750. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for laptop ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
API 91.2 |
Benchmark tests
These are the results of UHD Graphics 750 rendering performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest video card at the moment.
Overall benchmark performance
This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
UHD Graphics 750
5.86
- Passmark
Passmark
This is a very common benchmark included in the Passmark PerformanceTest package. He gives the card a thorough evaluation, running four separate tests for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11, and 12 (the latter being done at 4K resolution whenever possible), and a few more tests using DirectCompute.
Benchmark coverage: 26%
UHD Graphics 750
1733
Game tests
FPS in popular games on UHD Graphics 750, as well as compliance with system requirements. Remember that the official requirements of the developers do not always match the data of real tests.
Average FPS
Popular games
Relative performance
Overall performance of the UHD Graphics 750 compared to its closest desktop competitor.
AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
102.
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
101.37
ATI Radeon HD 5830
100
Intel UHD Graphics 750
100
AMD Radeon R9 M375X
99.32
AMD Radeon HD 7750
98.63
ATI Radeon HD 5770
98.29
Other video cards
Here we recommend several video cards that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one.
Radeon RX
570X
Compare
Radeon
550X
Compare
Radeon
540
Compare
Radeon Vega
6
Compare
Radeon RX
550X
Compare
Radeon RX
560X
Compare
Recommended processors
According to our statistics, these processors are most often used with the UHD Graphics 750.
Core i5
11600K
15.9%
Core i5
11500
13.3%
Core i7
11700K
11%
Core i7
11700
8.7%
Core i5
11600
7.9%
Core i5
11400
2.9%
Core i9
11900K
2.8%
Core i3
1115G4
2.7%
Core i5
1035G1
1.6%
Core i5
1135G7
1.