AMD Radeon HD 6750M vs RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
- CPU
- GPU
- SSD
- HDD
- RAM
- USB
▲
583,028
▼
Release date ≈ Q1 2018.
VS
YouTube*NEW*
About
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 93,161 user samples
Benchmark your GPU here
92,651 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 12% HP(103C 83E9) 1GB
Worst Bench: 6% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Poor: 6%
Great: 12%
SPEED RANK: 264th / 688
510 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 5% Apple(106B 00E2) 512MB
Worst Bench: 5% Apple(106B 6741) 512MB
Poor: 5%
Great: 5%
SPEED RANK: 391st / 688
| Effective 3D Speed Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed |
10. |
Hugely faster effective speed. +117% |
4.83 % |
| Lighting Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) |
12.4 fps | Hugely better lighting effects. +85% |
6.71 fps | |||
| Reflection Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) |
15.1 fps | Hugely better reflection handling. +123% |
6.77 fps | |||
| MRender Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) |
9.76 fps | Much faster multi rendering. +45% |
6.73 fps | |||
| Gravity Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) |
14. 3 fps |
Hugely faster NBody calculation. +198% |
4.8 fps |
| Lighting Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) |
14.6 fps | Hugely better peak lighting effects. +112% |
6.9 fps | |||
| Reflection High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) |
29.3 fps | Hugely better peak reflection handling. +319% |
7 fps | |||
| MRender Render target array GShader (Sphere) |
14 fps | Hugely faster peak multi rendering. +97% |
7.1 fps | |||
| Gravity NBody particle system (Galaxy) |
16 fps | Hugely faster peak NBody calculation. +229% |
4.87 fps |
Market Share
Based on 55,709,173 GPUs tested.
See market share leaders
| Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days) |
0.12 % | Insanely higher market share. +∞% |
0 % | |||
| User Rating UBM User Rating |
58 % | More popular. +12% |
52 % |
| Age Newest |
56+ Months | Much more recent. +45% |
102+ Months | |||
| Parallax Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) |
21. 9 fps |
Hugely better peak texture detail. +305% |
5.41 fps | |||
| Splatting Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) |
12.6 fps | Much faster peak complex splatting. +44% |
8.74 fps | |||
| Parallax Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) |
18 fps | Hugely better texture detail. +238% |
5.33 fps | |||
| Splatting Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) |
11.8 fps | Much faster complex splatting. +52% |
7.75 fps |
ADVERTISEMENT
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.
CHOOSE A COMPONENT:
CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance)
October 2022 GPU Rankings.
We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]
ADVERTISEMENT
Group Test Results
- Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
- Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.
- Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.
Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.
UserBenchmark of the month
Gaming
Desktop
ProGaming
CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB
How it works
- — Download and run UserBenchmark.
- — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
- — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.
com. - — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- — See speed test results from other users.
- — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Frequently Asked Questions
Best User Rated
-
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti
-
Nvidia RTX 3070
-
Nvidia RTX 3050
-
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)
-
Nvidia RTX 3080
-
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)
-
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)
-
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB
-
Nvidia RTX 2060
-
AMD RX 6600-XT
-
AMD RX 5600-XT
-
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)
About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube
Feedback
AMD Radeon HD 6750 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 8: What is the difference?
26points
AMD Radeon HD 6750
32points
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
vs
54 facts in comparison
AMD Radeon HD 6750
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
Why is AMD Radeon HD 6750 better than AMD Radeon RX Vega 8?
- 400MHz faster GPU clock speed?
700MHzvs300MHz - 2.
4 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
11.2 GPixel/svs8.8 GPixel/s - 208 more shading units?
720vs512 - Supports multi-display technology?
- Has an HDMI output?
- 4 more texture mapping units (TMUs)?
36vs32 - 1 higher version of GDDR memory?
5vs4 - 8 more render output units (ROPs)?
16vs8
Why is AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 better than AMD Radeon HD 6750?
- 0.12 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance?
1.13 TFLOPSvs1.01 TFLOPS - 21W lower TDP?
65Wvs86W - 10 GTexels/s higher texture rate?
35.2 GTexels/svs25.2 GTexels/s - 1 newer version of DirectX?
12vs11 - 0.4 newer version of OpenGL?
4.6vs4.2 - 3900million more transistors?
4940 millionvs1040 million - 0.8 newer version of OpenCL?
2vs1.
2 - 26nm smaller semiconductor size?
14nmvs40nm
Which are the most popular comparisons?
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop
AMD Radeon RX 5500M
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop
AMD Radeon RX 5500M
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Laptop
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop
AMD Radeon RX 6400
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Price comparison
User reviews
Performance
1.GPU clock speed
700MHz
300MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
2.GPU turbo
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon HD 6750)
1100MHz
When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
3.pixel rate
11.2 GPixel/s
8.8 GPixel/s
The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.
4.floating-point performance
1.01 TFLOPS
1.13 TFLOPS
Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.
5.texture rate
25.2 GTexels/s
35.2 GTexels/s
The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.
6.GPU memory speed
1150MHz
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 8)
The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth.
7.shading units
Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.
8.texture mapping units (TMUs)
TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.
9.render output units (ROPs)
The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.
Memory
1.effective memory speed
4600MHz
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 8)
The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
73.6GB/s
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 8)
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.VRAM
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 8)
VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of a graphics card. More VRAM generally allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.
4.memory bus width
128bit
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 8)
A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card.
5.version of GDDR memory
Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance.
6.Supports ECC memory
✖AMD Radeon HD 6750
✖AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
Features
1.DirectX version
DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
2.OpenGL version
OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
3.OpenCL version
Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.
4.Supports multi-display technology
✔AMD Radeon HD 6750
✖AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
The graphics card supports multi-display technology.
This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view.
5.load GPU temperature
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon HD 6750)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 8)
A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.
6.supports ray tracing
✖AMD Radeon HD 6750
✖AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games.
7.Supports 3D
✔AMD Radeon HD 6750
✖AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses).
8.supports DLSS
✖AMD Radeon HD 6750
✖AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an upscaling technology powered by AI.
It allows the graphics card to render games at a lower resolution and upscale them to a higher resolution with near-native visual quality and increased performance. DLSS is only available on select games.
9.PassMark (G3D) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 8)
This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.
Ports
1.has an HDMI output
✔AMD Radeon HD 6750
✖AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.
2.HDMI ports
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon HD 6750)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 8)
More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.
3.
HDMI version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon HD 6750)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 8)
Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.
4.DisplayPort outputs
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 8)
Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.
5.DVI outputs
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 8)
Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.
6.mini DisplayPort outputs
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 8)
Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort.
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best graphics cards?
Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/radeon-hd-6750-vs-radeon-rx-vega-8%23general-info
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
2060
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
Popular graphics cards
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
3090 Ti
Radeon RX
Vega 7
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Core i5
1135G7
vs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 7
3700X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
EPYC
7h22
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
3500U
Ryzen 3
5300U
Comparison of AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 and AMD Radeon HD 6750
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 and AMD Radeon HD 6750 video cards by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, API support, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, Memory, Technology support.
Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score, PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan ( Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
versus
AMD Radeon HD 6750
Benefits
Reasons to choose AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
- Newer graphics card, release dates difference 6 year(s) 9 month(s)
- A newer manufacturing process for the video card makes it more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 14 nm vs 40 nm
9019 % more: 1200 MHz vs 900 MHz
| Issue date | 26 Oct 2017 vs 21 January 2011 |
| Boost core clock | 1200 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Process | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Reasons to choose AMD Radeon HD 6750
- 41% more shader processors: 720 vs 512
| Number of shader processors | 720 vs 512 |
Benchmark comparison
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6750
| Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 | AMD Radeon HD 6750 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 1429 | |
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 962 | |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 297 | |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
7.456 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 529.474 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.869 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.57 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 90.406 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2100 | |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
3378 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2100 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3378 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 |
Feature comparison
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 | AMD Radeon HD 6750 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Vega | TeraScale 2 |
| Codename | Vega Raven Ridge | Juniper |
| Production date | 26 Oct 2017 | 21 January 2011 |
| Place in the ranking | 984 | 929 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
| Price at first issue date | $49. 99 |
|
| Price now | $49.99 | |
| Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 33.46 | |
| Boost core clock | 1200 MHz | 900MHz |
| Process | 14nm | 40 nm |
| Number of shaders | 512 | 720 |
| Floating point performance | 1,008.0 gflops | |
| Texturing speed | 25. 2 GTexel/s |
|
| Power consumption (TDP) | 86 Watt | |
| Number of transistors | 1,040 million | |
| DirectX | 12.1 | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
| Video connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Tire | PCIe 2. 0 x16 |
|
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Length | 170 mm | |
| Additional power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Maximum memory size | 1GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 73.6 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory frequency | 1050MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire |
Comparison AMD Radeon HD 7480D vs AMD Radeon HD 6750 which is better? AMD Radeon HD 7480D vs AMD Radeon HD 6750
AMD Radeon HD 7480D
16%
DeviceList Score
vs
AMD Radeon HD 6750
54%
DeviceList Score
We compared the AMD Radeon HD 7480D vs.
Find out which one to choose in 2022.
Advantage AMD Radeon HD 7480D
|
Process |
|
32 nm -8 nm (-20%) better than vs 40 nm |
Benefits AMD Radeon HD 6750
Comparison winner
|
Number of shader processors |
|
720 592 (462.5%) better than vs 128 |
|
Boost frequency |
|
900 MHz 176 MHz (24.3%) better than vs 724 MHz |
| General information | |
|
Price-quality ratio The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues. |
|
| n/a | 58.5% |
|
Architecture |
|
| Terascale 3 | TeraScale 2 |
|
Codename |
|
| Trinity | Juniper |
|
Type |
|
| Desktop | Desktop |
|
Release price |
|
| n/a | $49.99 |
|
Number of shaders |
|
| 128 | 720
592 (462.5%) better than |
|
Core clock |
|
| 614MHz | n/a |
|
Boost frequency |
|
| 724 MHz | 900 MHz
176 MHz (24.3%) better than |
|
Number of transistors |
|
| n/a | 1.040 million |
|
Process |
|
| 32 nm
-8 nm (-20%) better than |
40 nm |
|
Interface |
|
| n/a | PCIe 2. 0 x16 |
|
Power Demand (TDP) The calculated heat output shows the average heat dissipation in load operation, |
|
| no data | 86 W |
|
Length |
|
| n/a | 170 mm |
|
Additional power connectors |
|
| n/a | 1x 6-pin |
|
Tire |
|
| n/a | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
|
Design |
|
| n/a | reference |
|
Eyefinity |
|
| n/a | + |
|
HDMI |
|
|
Video connectors |
|
| n/a | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
|
DirectX |
|
DirectX 11, Shader 5. 0 |
DirectX® 11 |
|
Floating point performance |
|
| n/a | 1,008.0 gflops |
|
CrossFire |
|
| n/a | + |
| benchmark |
| memory | |
|
Memory type | |
| No data | GDDR5 |
|
Maximum memory Large video memory allows you to run demanding games with lots of textures, |
|
| n/a | 1 GB |
|
Memory bus width The wider the video memory bus, the more data is transferred to the GPU per unit of time and the better performance in demanding games. |
|
| n/a | 128 bit |
|
Shared memory |
|
| + | n/a |
|
Memory frequency A high memory frequency has a positive effect on the speed of a video card with a large amount of data. |
|
| n/a | 1050 MHz |
|
Memory bandwidth The higher the data transfer bandwidth, the more effective amount of RAM the PC can use. |
|
| n/a | 73.6 |
Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M vs AMD Radeon HD 6750 which is better?
Home / Video card / Nvidia GeForce GT 520M VS AMD Radeon HD 6750
NVIDIA GEFORCE GT 520M
58%
DEVICELIST
VS
AMD Radist 6750
54% 9000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 54% specifications of NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M and AMD Radeon HD 6750 and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2022.
Benefits NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
|
Power Demand (TDP) |
|
12 W -74 W (-86%) better than vs 86 W |
Benefits AMD Radeon HD 6750
Comparison winner
|
Value for money |
|
58. 1.8% (3.2%) better than vs 56.7% |
|
Release price |
|
$49.99 -10$ (-16.7%) better than vs $59.99 |
|
Number of shader processors |
|
720 672 (1400%) better than vs 48 |
|
Memory bus width |
|
128 bit 64 bit (100%) better than vs 64 bit |
|
Memory frequency |
|
1050 MHz 250 MHz (31.3%) better than vs 800 MHz |
|
Memory bandwidth |
|
73.6 60.8 (475%) better than vs 12.8 |
5%
| General | |
|
Value for money The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. |
|
| 56.7% | 58.5%
1.8% (3.2%) better than |
|
Architecture |
|
| Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
|
Codename |
|
| GF108 | Juniper |
|
Type |
|
| Notebook | Desktop |
|
Release price |
|
| 59.99 $ | $49.99
-10 $ (-16.7%) better than |
|
Number of shaders |
|
| 48 | 720
672 (1400%) better than |
|
Core clock |
|
| 672MHz | n/a |
|
Boost frequency |
|
| n/a | 900 MHz |
|
Number of transistors |
|
| 585 million | 1. 040 million |
|
Process |
|
| 40 nm | 40 nm |
|
Interface |
|
| PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
|
Power Demand (TDP) Calculated thermal power shows the average heat output in operation under load, |
|
| 12 W
-74 W (-86%) better than |
86 W |
|
Length |
|
| n/a | 170 mm |
|
Additional power connectors |
|
| n/a | 1x 6-pin |
|
CUDA The CUDA architecture enables applications that are optimized for |
|
|
Tire |
|
| n/a | PCIe 2. 0 x16 |
|
Number of CUDA cores A large number of CUDA cores improve performance in graphics computing, |
|
| 48 | n/a |
|
Design |
|
| n/a | reference |
|
Eyefinity |
|
| n/a | + |
|
HDMI |
|
|
OpenCL |
|
| 1.1 | n/a |
|
Verde Drivers |
|
| + | n/a |
|
DirectCompute |
|
| + | n/a |
|
Video connectors |
|
| No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
|
DirectX |
|
| 12 API | DirectX® 11 |
|
Floating point performance |
|
129. 02 gflops |
1,008.0 gflops |
|
Optimus |
|
| + | n/a |
|
CrossFire |
|
| n/a | + |
The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues. | benchmark |
| memory | |
|
Memory Type | |
| DDR3 | GDDR5 |
|
Maximum memory Large video memory allows you to run demanding games with lots of textures, |
|
| 1 GB | 1 GB |
|
Memory bus width The wider the video memory bus, the more data is transferred to the GPU per unit of time and the better performance in demanding games. |
|
| 64 bit | 128 bit
64 bit (100%) better than |
|
Shared memory |
|
| — | n/a |
|
Memory frequency A high memory frequency has a positive effect on the speed of a video card with a large amount of data. | |
