What is best processor for gaming: The Best CPU for Gaming in 2023 — Top Gaming CPUs for the Money

Honorable Mentions

There are only a couple of honorable mentions to go along with the best processors for PC gaming, and they didn’t quite make the list due to a few reasons. One because it’s more of a media center processor, but still works for gaming, and the other because it’s still too new.

Under $100 Budget Processor for gaming runner up: Intel Pentium K G3258All-Around Best Processor for gaming runner up: Intel i5 6600K

Conclusion

You should now have a pretty solid idea of the processors you want to be looking at within your price range. Whether you need a multitasking beast able to tackle the most modern games in 1 monitor while running photoshop and after effects in another, the i7 4790K is for you. If you need just something that is going to get good performance in games, and you want to keep your budget down, then consider the AMD FX 6300.

At the end of the day, the best all-around processor for gaming is the Intel i5 4690K due to it’s amazing price vs performance and overall amazing benchmarks and real-world performance in games. But, the new Intel i5 6600K shows very similar benchmarks and is returning very similar real-world results, and for the same price. The only downside with the 6600K is the fact that it comes with a new socket type (LGA 1151), and if you’re currently running an LGA 1150 mobo, it won’t be compatible with the 6600k, hence the 4690K still holding onto the crown as the all-around best processor for gaming.

Which processor are you currently running? Is it working like you expected it to? Let us know in the comment section! 

Best Processors for Gaming in 2023

cpus

by Perfect Tech Reviewer

Updated
2 days ago

A high-end gaming PC is based on some advanced and quality components; one of these basic components is a highly responsible processor for running the super-smart games. You are no longer concerned about multiple tasks challenging your Gaming set up to its maximum after choosing the Best Processor for gaming PC.

Since more cores are accessible than ever, but there are several things to remember before determining a gaming Processor to go with. Is there an AMD or Intel processor you can get? What kind of generation? What is your Route to Upgrade?

Contents

At A Glance:

Best pick

Best Fastest Processor for Gaming

Intel Core i7 10700K

✓
Complete hyper texture

✓
Comparatively low-price pr thread.

✓
Great performance for multi-tasking

✓
Heavy overclocking on base and boost speed

Staff Pick

Best Mid-Price Processor for Gaming

AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

✓
Pretty affordable

✓
Supports DDR4 memory.

✓
Pro-efficient and speedy

✓
PCIe 4.0 and 7-nanometer manufacturing.

Budget Pick

Best Budget-Friendly Processor for Gaming

Intel Core i5 9400F

✓
Lower TDP

✓
Included Cooler inbox

✓
Available intermediate output

✓
Excellent single-core performance.

You need to make sure that your motherboard is aligned with anything you want, depending on what you wish to since they are essentially compatible. At least AMD has made the situation a little simpler, as all its processors on this line socket are powered by 300, 400, or 500-series graphics cards into AM4 socket.

W5 Intel CPUs are somewhat slightly more complicated since the current Comet Lake update uses the new LGA1200 socket, and at this stage, we wish for either a Z490 or an affordable B460 motherboard. While the mentioned 9th gene CPUs are compliant with the LGA1151 socket’s motherboards and are assisted by the 300 series chipset.

Whatever generation you want, when you’re doing a complete upgrade, there’s a risk your outdated motherboard might not be aligned with that new Processor. Happily, our motherboard lineups for best gaming are congruent with the CPUs on just this ranking. Let’s discuss selecting a new processor because it’s not as easy as you would imagine.

Although you can rate them determined by the number of caches and performance, it may not be worth the effort to buy the most powerful one. In the end, you want a processor that is strong enough not to congest your GPU, despite causing a handful of cores lazing around doing something. Below we suggested CPUs to help you find the perfect balance between energy and cost at several different prices.

Intel Core i7 10700K

Best pick

View on amazon

Cores: 8 Threads: 16 Base clock: 3.8GHz Turbo clock: 5.1GHz (single core) Overclocking: Yes, standard allcore 5.1GHz L3 clock: 16 MB TDP: 95W PCIe 3.0 lanes: 16 MB TDP: 95W PCIe 3.0 lanes: 16.

The Core i7 10700 K isn’t the Processor that seeped into the initial Comet Lake verification. Intel needed to concentrate on the 10-core 10900 K, or 6-core 10600 K; however, for green cleaners cash, it’s the best android chip approximately. For the far more affordable Core i9 Processor, you’ll get a touch of more efficiency, although not as much as users find it in the game.

Particularly in comparison with AMD’s 3700X, another 8-core, 16-thread Processor of the 7 nm Zen 2 wide range, it provided a complete game development production top spot. It’s close in economic output evaluation too, while this Ryzen chip will probably get the advantage there, but not by it at all perceptible.

Then the overclocking is in. AMD processors don’t have many administrative costs in each other, CPUs’ widespread pricing. The Comet Lake CPUs compared to the single-core intensity. Still, you can probably leave the 10700 K from over 5GHz threshold on all processors, with or without evaporating through the vicissitudes. With PCIe 4.0 compatibility, the AMD framework has the advantages.

However, it is interesting to note that it does not have a lot of impact on gaming efficiency, notwithstanding Nvidia integrating it into the Ampere RTX 30 prequel chips. All it will do is accommodate, with PCIe 4.0 SSDs, for the best value disk drives. And we’d go for the new Intel Comet Lake processor for necessary playing connection speeds.

The Pros

✓
Complete hyper texture

✓
Comparatively low-price pr thread.

✓
Great performance for multi-tasking

✓
Heavy overclocking on base and boost speed

The Cons

✗
Energy stricken

✗
Little bit of heating issues while overclocking.

View on Amazon

Intel Core i9 10900K

View on amazon

Cores: 10 | Threads: 20 | Base Clock: 3.7GHz | Turbo Clock: 5.3GHz | Overclocking: Yes, 5.0-5.3GHz typical | L3 Cache: 20MB | TDP: 95W | PCIe 3.0 lanes: 16

If you need the very tough smart Processor, maybe all the Processor you want is the Core i9 10900K. For the overwhelming bulk of instances, and possibly at the very, really high-end, it’s overkill, but there’s stoic truth in the ‘premium gaming processor in the world. ’ You don’t require such a Processor, but as you build a computer across it, you recognize it’s not going to be this Processor that keeps you back.

For the first time Intel has tried to fit ten processing cores into its standard portfolio, the Core i9 10900 K is the first time Intel has tried to scrape ten processing cores through its popular starting rotation, and since it is capable of reaching 5.3GHz (but briefly), it indeed represents a fantastic debut for the 14 nm engineering that Intel has been connected to for so long.

Gaming still profits from elevated overclockability, and until then, the truth holds Intel ahead. To go along with this chip and some severe cooling, you’ll need to invest in a Z490 motherboard (a good PSU will not go amiss either). One should not be deceived by that rational 95W TDP, as it will propel well beyond that, mainly if you believe in investigating its overclocking cajones.

The 10900 K’s title prototype is the core count of the chip. With a full 10 CPU cores at its core, this is the first time Intel has managed to cram so many bodies into one mainstream CPU outside of the high-priced X-series chips. Throw in HyperThreading, and you have 20 threads of processing power, and they’re able to process a lot given the fast clock rate connected to this deca-core chip.

The primary clock seems a bit miserable at 3.7GHz, and you’re not even going to see it practically in actual service. Although the same could be said for the top-end clock speed of 5.3GHz, provided by a combination of Turbo Boost Max 3.0 and Thermal Velocity Boost. Those a couple of methodology sections by the Core i9 processors at Comet Lake, offering higher fluctuations should thermal and power delivery permit.

But, when it tends to overclock, With the i9’s thin die STIM attribute, ultimately slimmer CPU die, with adhesive on top as the thermally conductive substance and a heavier heat propagator, you’ll probably see some pretty good OC headroom out of the 10900K. However, Intel itself has already taken most of the headroom by offering the hallmark chip a single-core rating of 5.3GHz.

The Pros

✓
Large memory support

✓
High overclocking ability

✓
Super efficient for high-end gaming

✓
Fast in both single- and multi-threaded speed

The Cons

✗
High price range.

✗
PCIe 3.0 interface.

View on Amazon

AMD Ryzen 9 3900X

View on amazon

Cores: 12 | Threads: 24 | Base Clock: 3.8GHz | Boost Clock: 4.6GHz | Overclocking: Yes, though PBO is better | L3 Cache: 64MB | TDP: 105W | PCIe 4.0 lanes: 16

In our gaming CPU tests, AMD’s third-generation Ryzen processors facilitate the stakeholders’ most significant victory. The 3900X might not be the actual maximum gaming CPU, but it is powerful enough to use gamers’ configurations and exposures, which are still the most efficient beyond games CPU.

The Ryzen 9 3900X from AMD costs approximately much like the Core i9 9900 K last-gen, but it contains a right Wraith Ripple radiator and packs 50 percent additional cores and strings. In hyperthreaded staffing levels such as video processing and 3D rendering, that transforms into 8% slower gaming efficiency and 25% reliable speed.

And suppose one is just concerned about gaming. In that case, the eight percent shortfall can only be seen in poorer quality configurations and more unsatisfactory performance with the fastest option GPU ( RTX 2080 Ti at 1080p ultra ). Unless you’re a pro player striving for the best processor for gaming that gives you 240fps at an acceptable standard, it might matter, but most would be delighted only with the output the 3900X provides.

AMD traps you at a constant turbo boost when overclocking is inevitable, leading to slower clocks at lower workflows. Precision Boost Overdrive (PBO) can yield higher output up to 200MHz while preserving turbo proportions, and is the best option for the 3900X. Users might also move up to the Ryzen 9 3950X, giving you 16 cores and 32 threads.

That being said, it charges the CPU 50 percent extra, and you must also have a cooler. The 3900X is much more than adequate for entertainment purposes, and even for most application development activities. You also get PCIe Gen4, which doesn’t appeal to most users. Still, like Nvidia’s ray tracing assistance, I would much rather have that than not moving forward; you have a specialized x4 PCIe link for your default M.2 NVMe SSD, you get a little more cores, users also get reduced power use.

And all of the side-channel assault vulnerabilities such as Spectre, Foreshadow, MDS, and Fallout target Intel CPUs so far cross fingers and don’t function on AMD’s CPUs. All this at rates that are equal or smaller than what you will spend for Intel. entertainment purposes and most application development activities.

The Pros

✓
Supports PCIe 4.0

✓
Reasonable price range.

✓
Fast and efficient by architecture.

✓
Fifty percent more cores and strings.

The Cons

✗
High consumption of power.

✗
Most apps don’t need 12 cores.

View on Amazon

AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

Staff Pick

View on amazon

Cores: 8 | Threads: 16 | Base Clock: 3. 6GHz | Turbo Clock: 4.4GHz | Overclocking: Yes, 4.2-4.3GHz (PBO is better) | L3 Cache: 32MB | TDP: 65W | PCIe 4.0 lanes: 16

Standing aside from the 3900X on cost and component metrics, the Ryzen 7 3700X is almost as quick in games and has all the other advantages of AMD’s Zen 2 framework. That provides functions for PCIe Gen4, which is not essential, mainly, but becomes valuable shortly.

It’s a decent AMD selection, and then you’ll get an 8-core/16-thread CPU with a Wraith Prism cooler for about $280. It’s about 9 percent weaker in gaming comparable performance to Intel’s i7 9700 K, indeed, at 1080p via an RTX 2080 Ti. If users afford a better GPU like the RX 5700 XT from AMD, some gaming output variation would mostly be insignificant.

In other areas, it’s around 18 percent faster in multithreaded implementations, and ultimately it gains the contest at both size and cost. The 3700X, as a straight gaming CPU, is acceptable. It’s one of the best investments right now, bringing in the whole kit. Overclocking is merely inadequate, as with the 3900X, but storage optimization can theoretically make a more significant distinction.

MD’s Ryzen processors tend to keep Intel’s strain, prompting the widespread pricing of efficient and modern CPUs. AMD sounds the decapitation-knell for HEDT networks with the third generation Ryzen. Users love the concept of extreme performance, and the 56-core and 64-core server chips are cold, but in my home PC, I don’t need them.

One doesn’t require the Intel or AMD HEDT processors with chips like the Ryzen 9 3900X. So the decision must be logical if you can get a decent 8-core chip for $329 and 12-core chips for $499. Ryzen 7 3700X is a decent overall CPU, and for most users, it is probably a reasonable solution.

It is still more straightforward when we step down for outstanding and comfortable pieces by a nick or two. Absolute quality is fine, but sometimes the balanced approach is better.

The Pros

✓
Pretty affordable

✓
Supports DDR4 memory.

✓
Pro-efficient and speedy

✓
PCIe 4.0 and 7-nanometer manufacturing.

The Cons

✗
Heating issues.

✗
Limited possible overclocking

View on Amazon

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

View on amazon

Cores: 6 | Threads: 12 | Base Clock: 3.6GHz | Turbo Clock: 4.2GHz | Overclocking: Yes, 4.2GHz typical | L3 Cache: 32MB | TDP: 65W | PCIe 4.0 lanes: 16

For its third-generation Ryzen CPUs, its enhanced efficiency and productivity, AMD makes a compelling argument. As it contributes to gameplay and other activities, the Ryzen 5 3600 is marginally below the 3900X.

However, the focus is on the term ‘slightly’ without a reason, usually a 5 percent discrepancy or less. Furthermore, for an intermediate CPU, we highly doubt that anyone intends to pair it with an RTX 2080 Ti. A moderate GPU, just like AMD RX 5700, or even the following generations RX 590, would have been a better alternative.

The 3600 didn’t stick you back eventually. You already get a 6-core/12-thread graphics card, and the 3600 is relatively smoother than the 9400F of Intel outside of sports. But again, the 3600 costs more as well. It has the other advantages of AMD’s Zen 2 framework, such as PCIe Gen4, and AMD’s CPUs have also had even fewer challenges with side-channel assault such as Meltdown, Spectre, Foreshadow, and MDS, offering you more sense of security as far as protection is concerned.

It can also be looked at for $40, mostly as a minor step inefficiency. Still, compared to a cheaper preliminary stage, the vanilla 3600 can overclock a little stronger, fitting its more famous relative efficiently. Even with Ryzen CPUs, quick recollection with fast positioning increases productivity.

The Pros

✓
Budget-friendly

✓
Nice pairing with AMD GPU

✓
Does every that it promises.

✓
Quite safe and reliable with 6 cores and 12 threads.

The Cons

✗
Poor combination of 6 cores

✗
Heating issue while overclocking

View on Amazon

Summary For Best Processor for Gaming

Conclusion

The right choice of purchasing and selecting the Best Processor for gaming demands the proper use. Whenever purchasing a processor for gaming requires some especially focusing elements such as Cores, Threads, Base clock, Turbo clock, Overclocking, cache, TDP, PCIe, and its lanes. The compatibility of all these elements cores the final notations about its object. A wise purchaser always researched the hook up of a system, or the easiest way is to read our article for quick and straightforward guidelines.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best gaming processor?

You would like to match quality and performance with your PC allocation while shopping for the best gaming CPU. Our suggestions and choices will help you select the best gaming CPU. But you can carry out our Buying Guide for comprehensive support on choosing the right Processor for your gaming machine. But if you’re in the debate about which CPU firm to go along with, then the AMD vs. Intel features exhaustive research, and a strong champion pops up. Of course, you didn’t overlook a graphics card if your primary focus is gaming. If your GPU is underpowered and outdated, getting the best available gaming CPU didn’t improve you much. So be best to inspect our Best Graphics Cards page and also GPU Hierarchy to ensure you’ve got the right card for the gaming level you’re looking for. As our number one ranking INTEL CORE I7 10700k.

What is the best intel processor for gaming?

Intel and AMD have outstanding processors such as video editing and transcoding for gaming and productivity activities, but they also have their specialties. AMD’s top-of-the-line processors, such as the 3900X and 3950X 12- and 16-core processors, have more core than anything Intel has on an offer outside the skilled space, making them real workhorse processors. They’re good at gaming, too, but Intel’s most competent CPUs, such as the 9900 K and 10900 K, carry a significant advantage over even AMD’s best at the very top end.

What is the best AMD processor f6r gaming?

However, you don’t have to buy the best to receive an excellent CPU for gaming or work. At around the $250 mark, AMD’s Ryzen 7 3700X is a perfect chip for work and play, with eight cores and a higher load clock, comfortably topping the Intel 10600 K in productivity tasks. On the other hand, the Intel CPU is a more powerful gaming processor, and if you’re keen in overclocking, it can also obtain the kind of multigame performance offered by the much more costly 10900K. There are several other explanations you may need to recommend AMD or Intel than the other, though than results. If that’s something you can make use of, Intel’s new generation CPUs have much more robust support for Thunderbolt 3 ports. The new AMD 500-series motherboards support PCI-Express 4.0, allowing higher picture quality in some niche cases and opening up more possibilities for faster processing.

Is Ryzen 7 better than i7?

Although Intel’s Core i7-9700 K indeed provides better raw output than AMD’s Ryzen 7 2700X, because of its significant come down in price, AMD’s chip offers a considerably better value. A PC based on Intel’s Core i7-9700 K will easily cost $130 too much for a machine fitted with an AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $329/£299.99 if you factor in the cost of a motherboard and cooler. The extra production you have with the i7-9700 K for most customers is not worth the price. The incredibly expensive Processor you’re ready to throw a fair amount of money on will finally remain well equipped with gaming clips. You can guarantee that it’s running to its highest capability.

Perfect Tech Reviewer

I write about PC gaming hardware and tech gadgets for gamers and professionals. My mission is to help you build individualized and unique high-performance PCs for your special needs and budget.

What is the best processor for gaming: An overview of the characteristics of

The question of which processor is best for games has been raised since the very time when games began to appear on personal computers.

Today it has not lost its relevance.

Content:

Therefore, it would be useful to understand what characteristics can make this or that processor really the best for gaming computers.

And also what model can be called the best in all these characteristics in 2017.

Let’s say right away that we will not choose a model that costs the most and has all the characteristics at its maximum.

Instead, we will select the model that will 100% pull absolutely all modern games.

The reason for this is that today there is simply no need for too high characteristics, and processors with high parameters are a simple means of PR for various companies.

In principle, we can state the fact that the most powerful processor today is the Intel Core i7-5960X, but it makes no sense to buy it.

The fact is that so far not a single program, not a single game needs its power.

In addition, it is only 9 times more powerful than one of the weakest AMD A4-4000 processors, and it is 43 times more expensive ($1,300)!

You can buy it purely out of sporting interest. And this is a vivid example of what we talked about above — the processor is powerful, but who needs it?

Processor Intel Core i7-5960X

Therefore, it is better to choose the processor that is ideal for a gamer and that can be bought for a «human» amount.

You should also be interested in articles:

• Which Windows is better for gaming — A detailed comparison of

systems

• Buying a laptop! Which one to choose for games?
• Which graphics card is best for gaming — Selection by main parameters

Parameter #1. Number of cores

As you know, the processor core is the part where the calculations take place. But the definition of «number of processor cores» is not entirely correct, from a technical point of view.

A quad-core processor is actually four separate processors on the same board.

Only the task that arrives at the device is divided into all four parts.

It is logical that the more «cores», the better, because the faster the device will work.

Last year, a study was conducted that clearly showed that the power of the processor in games directly depends on the number of cores.

GTA 5 was taken for research and launched on two, four, six and eight cores.

The graphs show the number of frames per second (fps).

Test results of GTA 5 on different number of CPU cores

But the same study of The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt gave a completely unexpected result — there a larger number of fps was recorded when four and six cores were working.

The results of testing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt on a different number of processor cores

Interestingly, most experts agree on the optimal number of cores.

They say that all modern games run smoothly on a quad-core processor.

Yes, heavier games will be released in the future, but it still doesn’t make much sense to choose a six-core processor.

After all, for the same GTA 5, two cores are enough. Well, what kind of game should come out so that 4 cores are not enough for it?

Today it is difficult to imagine such a thing. Hence the first selection criterion.

back to content ↑

Parameter #2. Frequency

This characteristic determines how many operations per second the device can process. Logically, the higher the frequency, the better.

In the same past year, Metro: Last Light was tested at different frequencies of the same processor.

The number of frames per second was measured, but at different screen resolutions. What happened in the end can be seen in the figure.

Diagram of frames per second versus processor frequency

Considering this characteristic, it should be said that today there is no point in buying processors with a frequency of less than 2.4 GHz.

The fact is that they will not be able to properly process all the information from games and programs that require significant computing resources.

At the same time, when choosing the optimal number of GHz, one should take into account the notorious marketing factor, which is that manufacturers simply make processors with too high a frequency, which makes no sense today.

The fact is that the heaviest games work quietly at 2.5 GHz.

But it is also worth considering that we want to use the computer for a long time and not change the processor.

And over time, when too much information accumulates on the computer, it becomes more difficult for even the most powerful processor to process it.

This is not due to the fact that the frequency and, accordingly, the power are falling, but simply due to the increasing load.

Therefore, it is better to buy a processor with a margin — at 4 GHz.

Such a device, even after five years of use, will easily run the heaviest games, despite the fact that terabytes of information will be stored on the hard drive.

Hence the second criterion.

Another argument in favor of this criterion is the rating of processors compiled by cpubenchmark.net, whose experts determine which model has the highest performance (classic Benchmark).

Their ranking for 2017 is as follows:

CPU rating cpubenchmark. net

As you can see, the first place here is generally occupied by a model with 2.3 GHz.

back to content ↑

Parameter #3. Architecture

Without really going into details, let’s say that Intel’s best architectures are Haswell, Broadwell and Skylake, while AMD’s is Steamroller.

They came out in the last three years and are in the lead in all ratings of audience sympathy and opinions of specialists.

Most of all they have positive feedback.

As for which one is the best, another study helps determine this, in which processors with different architectures were tested on computers with one video card and fps was measured in GTA 5.

The result can be seen in the figure.

Comparison of processors with different architectures in GTA 5

As you can see, the indicators are not very different, but the Broadwell and Skylake architectures show themselves best. And Haswell, Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridge, which are used by most gamers today, are far behind the leading positions.

True, the study was conducted only for Intel devices. But AMD’s Steamroller will also show good results. Hence the next criterion.

back to content ↑

Comparison of processors from Intel and AMD

Now the main question — Intel or AMD? In fact, this question has been raised ever since two models from these two companies were released simultaneously.

But it can be answered with the help of the same comparison that was made earlier.

We take different processors with the same number of cores and frequency, run a heavy game in them (the same GTA 5) and see where there are more fps. The result can be seen in Figure 7.

Comparison of processors from Intel and AMD

It is clearly seen that in this game you can get more fps on Intel processors, and the difference is quite significant. This leads to the next criterion.

But if you don’t have much money in your pocket, then you can look for a budget solution among AMD representatives.

back to content ↑

Summing up

So, based on the above: we are looking for an Intel processor with Broadwell or Skylake architecture, a minimum frequency of 4 GHz and a minimum number of cores equal to 4.

This exists only 1 and it is called very simply — Intel Core i7 Skylake. You can buy such a model for $ 450, which is very good.

Intel Core i5 and i7 Skylake

Among other features of this processor 8192 KB of L3 cache.

We did not include this parameter in the selection criteria, because studies have shown that cache size does not really affect performance.

In addition, on models with the specified architectures, the cache simply cannot be too small for normal operation.

Of particular note is the maximum memory bandwidth.

Here it is 34.1 GB/s. This means that in one second the processor can process 34.1 GB of information.

An impressive figure!

In addition, in Intel Core i7 Skylake 1150 MHz is the maximum frequency of the graphics core.

Given that most powerful modern video cards operate at a frequency of 1000-1200 MHz, we can conclude that any conflicts and freezes with this processor are simply excluded.

back to content ↑

Combination: processor + hard disk

It’s worth saying that while the Intel Core i7 Skylake has been voted the best processor for gaming today, it’s been known for a long time that the combination of a good processor and a hard drive can produce great results.

It is known that if a user wants to achieve good performance, he needs to buy not an HDD, but an SSD drive.

A good dual-core processor combined with a fast SSD drive will give the same result as the same Intel Core i7 Skylake with a slow HDD.

Based on this, the next advice.

Of course, the Intel Core i7 Skylake with a fast SSD will make your computer a real bomb!

And if you add a cool video card to this, then you will provide yourself with a gaming resource for the next 5 years.

Some more information about our winner, the Intel Core i7 Skylake, in the video below.

Intel Core i7-6700K — an overview of the top Intel Skylake processor

Introducing the Intel Skylake microarchitecture, as well as comparing the flagship 6th generation Intel Core with its direct competitors in the market.

Which processor is better to choose for a tablet?

The tablet has turned from a fashionable electronic gadget into a valuable assistant for a student, businessman, young mother, freelancers. Thanks to this electronic device, you can easily solve work issues, chat with relatives, friends and acquaintances via Skype, share vivid photos and play your favorite computer games. As you can see, the device has a lot of functions. However, they are difficult to implement without the support of a powerful processor.

We evaluate the processor

When choosing a tablet, it is important to evaluate not only the appearance of the device, but also its technical characteristics:

• amount of RAM;
• screen resolution;
• operating system type.

These indicators determine how comfortable you will be working with an electronic gadget. However, all these characteristics fade without a high-quality, reliable and high-speed processor. The first thing to evaluate is:

• processor frequency;
• number of cores;
• processor model.

A couple of years ago, a tablet with a single core processor was considered a good and practical purchase. His work seemed reactive, and loading media files within 2-3 minutes did not cause irritation.
Today, user requests have increased significantly. They choose tablet processors that have at least two cores to make watching HD movies, playing PC games and chatting in messengers faster. They don’t like waiting 60 seconds for a web app and pages to load. The processor with four cores copes with such small tasks within 10-20 seconds. As a result, surfing the Web becomes pleasant — not annoying or unnerving.

Also, the power of the central processor in the tablet is of no small importance for processing information. Agree, it’s not very pleasant to wait 5-6 minutes until a text document or video clip is loaded on the screen for 2 minutes. In this case, it is necessary to “overclock” the speed of the processor or “pump” its technical indicators. Programs for this are enough. For example, a cpu for a tablet. This application will provide maximum information about the electronic gadget and speed up the processor.

Number of cores in the processor

Many buyers are interested in the question: «What is the optimal number of cores for a tablet processor?».
Experts are sure that the choice of this indicator directly depends on your goals in using an electronic gadget.
Let’s say that you plan to work with text documents and occasionally run short videos. In this case, it is quite enough for you to choose a processor for a tablet with two cores.
It will provide fast loading text editors for writing articles, reviews and testimonials, videos. A tablet of this type will also cope with the work in a browser in which only 2-3 tabs are open. But to run computer games or work with numerous tabs in the browser, you need a device with a more powerful processor. There is a chance that a mini-computer with a dual-core processor simply will not pull virtual fun, and when loading numerous web pages, it will turn off and on automatically every time to save battery.

What is the best processor for gaming on a tablet?

They say that the best option for fans of computer games is a tablet computer with a quad-core processor. With it, you will quickly start large games and will not worry about the fact that the game will stop at the most interesting place or the electronic gadget will restart for no reason. The game will give you the most vivid impressions and a carefree holiday. But the main thing is that you can run your favorite games anywhere and anytime: on the train, in the mall or on the beach. By the way, there will be no problems with the choice of electronic gadgets in this format — they are produced by all the leading manufacturers of the world market.

How to test the processor?

Many users have doubts: is a tablet with a multi-core processor as good as it is written about in magazines and experienced computer scientists say? You can check this indicator when buying a device. In retail outlets, you can always download the game or play online. You will evaluate the speed of the electronic gadget, its capabilities and technical indicators.
Better more expensive, but better quality?
The number of cores in the processor affects the final cost of the device.