Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/xeon-x5680-vs-xeon-x5675%23general-info
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
Popular graphics cards
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
4090
Radeon RX
580
GeForce RTX
3060
Radeon RX
Vega 7
GeForce GTX
1650
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Core i5
1135G7
vs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
EPYC
7h22
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
3500U
Ryzen 3
5300U
Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/xeon-x5680-vs-xeon-x5675%23characteristics
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
Popular graphics cards
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
4090
Radeon RX
580
GeForce RTX
3060
Radeon RX
Vega 7
GeForce GTX
1650
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Core i5
1135G7
vs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
EPYC
7h22
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
3500U
Ryzen 3
5300U
0003
|
Release price |
|
$162 -10$ (-5. vs 172 $ |
|
Value for money |
|
40.7% 4.8% (13.4%) better than vs 35.9% nine0027 |
|
Power Demand (TDP) |
|
95 W -35 W (-26.9%) better than vs 130 W |
Benefits of Intel Xeon X5680
Comparison winner
|
Base frequency |
|
3.333 GHz At 0.267 GHz (8.7%) better than vs 3.066 GHz |
|
Maximum frequency |
|
3.6 GHz 0.14 GHz (4%) better than vs 3.46 GHz |
|
Maximum core temperature |
|
79°C -2 °C (-2. vs 81 °C |
|
Passmark |
|
6524 243 (3.9%) better than vs 6281 |
5%) better | General | |
|
Type |
|
| Server | Server |
|
Architecture code name |
|
| Westmere-EP | Westmere-EP |
|
Cores A large number of cores improves performance in multi-threaded applications. |
|
| 6 | 6 |
|
Threads More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
|
| 12 | 12 |
|
Base frequency |
|
3. 066 GHz |
3.333 GHz
At 0.267 GHz (8.7%) better than |
|
Process |
|
| 32 nm | 32 nm |
|
Chip size |
|
| 239 mm2 | 239 mm2 |
|
Number of transistors |
|
| 1 million | 1 million |
|
Maximum frequency Processors with a high clock speed perform more calculations per second and thus provide better performance. |
|
| 3.46GHz | 3.6 GHz
Better than at 0.14 GHz (4%) |
|
Support 64 bit |
|
|
Max. number of processors in configuration |
|
| 2 | 2 |
|
Socket |
|
| FCLGA1366 | FCLGA1366 |
|
Release price |
|
| $162
-10$ (-5. |
172 $ |
|
Value for money The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues. |
|
| 40.7%
4.8% (13.4%) better than |
35.9% |
|
Maximum core temperature |
|
| 81 °C | 79°C nine0002 -2 °C (-2.5%) better than |
|
TXT Intel Trusted Execution Technology for hardware-based malware protection. For each protected program, the processor allocates its own isolated section of RAM. |
|
|
Demand Based Switching |
|
| + | |
|
PAE |
|
| 40 bit | 40 bit |
|
Level 1 Cache The fastest level of cache that works directly with the core. |
|
| 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
|
Level 2 cache |
|
| 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
|
Level 3 cache |
|
| 12288 Kb (total) | 12 MB (total) |
|
Power Demand (TDP) The calculated heat output shows the average heat dissipation in load operation, |
|
| 95W
-35 W (-26.9%) better than |
130 W |
|
EDB |
|
| + | + |
|
Permissible core voltage |
|
| 0.75V-1.35V | 0.75V-1.35V |
8%) better than 
The larger the cache, the better the performance. | Benchmarks | |
|
Passmark |
|
| 6281 | 6524
243 (3. |
9%) better than | Technologies and Advanced Instructions | |
|
Extended Instructions |
|
| Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.2 |
|
Turbo Boost |
|
| 1.0 | 1.0 |
|
Idle States |
|
|
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) Technology from Intel that allows the processor to slow down to its lowest frequency to conserve power when the processor is idle. |
|
|
Hyper-Threading Intel hardware technology that allows multiple threads to be processed on each processor core. For server applications, the performance improvement is up to 30%. |
|
|
AES-NI Technology from Intel that speeds up the AES encryption process. |
|
| + | + |
| RAM options | |
|
RAM types |
|
| DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333 | |
|
Allowable memory The maximum amount of RAM that can be used with this processor. |
|
| 288 GB | 288 GB |
|
Number of memory channels |
|
| 3 | 3 |
|
ECC memory support EEC memory is designed specifically for systems with high requirements for data processing reliability. |
|
| Virtualization Technologies | |
|
VT-x |
|
|
EPT |
|
|
VT-d Intel virtualization technology allows you to forward devices on the PCI bus to the guest operating system so that it can work with them using its standard tools. |
|
nine0003 | Integrated graphics |
Dual processor system for pennies part 2: Upgrade
This material was written by a site visitor and has been rewarded.
In the last part, I described the assembly and the problems that I encountered when building a 2-processor system as a main computer. The system was assembled for the purpose of a subsequent upgrade. There have been some updates over the past month, but more on that later. Now the most important update is the replacement of temporary plugs with normal processors, today they arrived from Ali 2 handsome men in the form of Xeon X5660. nine0003
I thought for a long time which processors to order. X5650 cost 1700 r, but the frequency is too low, 2.66 in stock, 2.9 in Boost mode, the 3GHz psychological mode has an effect. Then I considered the X5675 models (2900r for 1 pc) and X5680 (3200r for 1 pc), but since I need 2 processors, the toad somehow began to choke.
And I caught my eye X5660 for 1980r for a stone, for some reason I had not even met them before. I considered only models with 6 cores: take more at once. I will not hide, I earned money for a new thing on blogs. nine0003
recommendations
There were other changes in the system from the last article, added memory up to 24GB, now it works in six-channel mode, Raid0 was built from 2x HDD WD CaviarGreen through the native controller, normal Creative audio was added, on the 2nd processor the standard cooler was replaced with IceHummer Ih5400.
In the last article, many asked about the noise. I’ll try to explain everything now. The video card is equipped with Acelero Extrime II Plus, the speed is set so that it does not spin up more than 60% (max temperature is about 70C). The first processor is equipped with ASUS Triton 88, the standard fan is powered through a resistor, rpm 900 rpm, the second processor is IceHummer Ih5400, the native fan has been replaced, its maximum speed is the same 900 rpm.
The blower in front is Zalman F3, powered by reobas, the back blower is 120mm CoolerMaster (I don’t remember which one) and 92mm Noname, powered by the same reobas. They were configured so that when the processor fans were running at 900 rpm, they would not stand out. The only noisy element was the PSU, although the power reserve (Cougar SX850) in it is large, it blows out a significant part of the heated air. Yes, and the standard fan is tired, it has been working for 7 years. I replaced it with Arctic F14, the PSU controls the speed itself, and now the fan does not spin at all without load. I took the valve with a margin, the maximum speed was 1350 rpm. nine0003
Corps is still the same «temporary». I modified it a bit, closed all the gaps at the back so that the fans would not drive heated air.
Yes, this is cardboard 🙂 Since the fan of the 2nd processor had nowhere to take cool air, and in front of it there were also hard drives that also heat up, I drilled a grill in the side wall
do not count the protruding BP.
I perfectly understand that this is a terrible collective farm, but everything is functional and works. In the future, a custom case is planned, because I could not find something ready at reasonable prices. nine0003
Let’s move on to the tests.
System configuration:
Motherboard: From HP Z800 graphics station, Bios latest 3.6
Processors: Xeon X5660 6 cores, HT technology, 2.8GHz stock, 3.06GHz Boost when all cores are loaded, 3.2GHz when loaded per 1 core of each processor. 2 pieces.
Memory: 4 sticks of 4GB + 4 sticks of 2GB Kingston 1333MHz 9-9-9-24 ECC Reg0003
Video card: Radeon HD 7870 2Gb 1100/1300 1.17v
Disk system: 2xHDD WD Caviar Green 1Tm Raid0 (for data) + SSD Kingston 120GB
Power supply: Cougar CX850.
Case: Termaltake Swing mutilated.
System: Windows 10 Pro with all current updates.
I have already written about the cooling system in detail.
In the configuration with E5540 processors, everything is the same, except for processors, and the memory worked in 1066 MHz mode 7-7-7-20
Everywhere in the tests, the first result is E5540, and the second X5660.
1. WinRAR
The difference is almost 2 times, it was unexpected.
2. Aida64 memory and cache speed test
The difference in memory speed is not that big, the increased timings have an effect, but the difference in processor cache speed is about 50%.
3. CINEBENCH R15
for clarity, the result is Core i7 8700k
Here, too, the difference is huge and is about 40%
4. Geekbench-4.2.3
Here, it is clear that in a single stream the difference is small and is caused by an increased frequency. 4 more cores have been added to the multithread and the result is expected.
And here, for clarity, the result is 8700k
The difference in single-thread is 2 times, but between the processors of 7 years 18nm and 700MHz, in a multi-thread is not so much. And in the case of i7 2xxx and above, AVX works which is not on socket 1366
5.