X5690 vs x5650: Intel Xeon X5690 @ 3.47GHz vs Intel Xeon X5650 @ 2.67GHz [cpubenchmark.net] by PassMark Software

Intel Xeon X5690 vs Intel Xeon X5650

Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon X5690 and Intel Xeon X5650 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

Intel Xeon X5690

Buy on Amazon

vs

Intel Xeon X5650

Buy on Amazon

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon X5690

• CPU is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
• Around 22% higher clock speed: 3. 73 GHz vs 3.06 GHz
• Around 31% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 1716 vs 1306
• Around 27% better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 12887 vs 10167
• Around 24% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 637 vs 515
• Around 15% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 3517 vs 3060
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.301 vs 2.639
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 57.148 vs 56.607
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.762 vs 0.711
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 5.122 vs 4.087
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 15.77 vs 12.497

Launch date	February 2011 vs March 2010
Maximum frequency	3. 73 GHz vs 3.06 GHz
PassMark — Single thread mark	1716 vs 1306
PassMark — CPU mark	12887 vs 10167
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	637 vs 515
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	3517 vs 3060
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	3.301 vs 2.639
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	57.148 vs 56.607
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.762 vs 0.711
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	5.122 vs 4.087
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	15.77 vs 12.497

Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon X5650

• Around 4% higher maximum core temperature: 81.3°C vs 78.5°C
• Around 37% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 130 Watt

Maximum core temperature	81.3°C vs 78.5°C
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	95 Watt vs 130 Watt

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Xeon X5690
CPU 2: Intel Xeon X5650

PassMark — Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2
PassMark — CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	57.148 56.607
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	12.497

Name	Intel Xeon X5690	Intel Xeon X5650
PassMark — Single thread mark	1716	1306
PassMark — CPU mark	12887	10167
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	637	515
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	3517	3060
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score	0	3987
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	3.301	2.639
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	57.148	56.607
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.762	0.711
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	5.122	4.087
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	15.77	12.497

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Xeon X5690	Intel Xeon X5650
Architecture codename	Westmere EP	Westmere EP
Launch date	February 2011	March 2010
Launch price (MSRP)	$205	$53
Place in performance rating	2041	2059
Price now	$149	$29. 91
Processor Number	X5690	X5650
Series	Legacy Intel® Xeon® Processors	Legacy Intel® Xeon® Processors
Status	Discontinued	Discontinued
Value for money (0-100)	17.68	73.02
Vertical segment	Server	Server
64 bit support
Base frequency	3. 46 GHz	2.66 GHz
Bus Speed	6.4 GT/s QPI	6.4 GT/s QPI
Die size	239 mm	239 mm
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	64 KB (per core)
L2 cache	256 KB (per core)	256 KB (per core)
L3 cache	12288 KB (shared)	12288 KB (shared)
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	32 nm
Maximum core temperature	78. 5°C	81.3°C
Maximum frequency	3.73 GHz	3.06 GHz
Number of cores	6	6
Number of QPI Links	2	2
Number of threads	12	12
Transistor count	1170 million	1170 million
VID voltage range	0.750V-1.350V	0.750V-1.350V
ECC memory support
Max memory channels	3	3
Maximum memory bandwidth	32 GB/s	32 GB/s
Maximum memory size	288 GB	288 GB
Supported memory types	DDR3 800/1066/1333	DDR3 800/1066/1333
Low Halogen Options Available
Max number of CPUs in a configuration	2	2
Package Size	42. 5mm X 45mm	42.5mm X 45mm
Sockets supported	FCLGA1366	FCLGA1366
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	130 Watt	95 Watt
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
Idle States
Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4. 2	Intel® SSE4.2
Intel 64
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Physical Address Extensions (PAE)	40-bit	40-bit
Thermal Monitoring
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)

Navigation

Choose a CPU

Compare processors

Compare Intel Xeon X5690 with others

Intel
Xeon X5690



vs



Intel
Xeon X5650




Intel
Xeon X5690



vs



AMD
Opteron 3260 HE




Intel
Xeon X5690



vs



AMD
Opteron 3250 HE




Intel
Xeon X5690



vs



AMD
Opteron 2354




Intel
Xeon X5690



vs



Intel
Xeon Gold 6248




Intel
Xeon X5690



vs



Intel
Xeon X7460

Dual Intel Xeon X5650 vs Dual Intel Xeon X5690 Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences

Dual Intel Xeon X5650 vs Dual Intel Xeon X5690

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Dual Intel Xeon X5650 on one side and the Dual Intel Xeon X5690 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the server sector, It has 6 cores, 12 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,1GHz. The second is used on the server segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 12 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,7 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench and Cinebench.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specification comparison:

Processor		Dual Intel Xeon X5650				Dual Intel Xeon X5690
Market (main)		Server				Server
ISA		x86-64 (64 bit)				x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture		Westmere				Westmere
Core name		Beckton				Westmere-EP
Family		Xeon X5600				Xeon X5600
Part number(s), S-Spec		BX80614X5650, AT80614004320AD, Q3QN, Q3UQ, Q4EJ, SLBV3				BX80614X5690, AT80614005913AB, Q4F1, SLBVX
Release date		Q1 2010				Q1 2011
Lithography		32 nm				32 nm
Transistors		2. 340.000.000				2.340.000.000
Cores		12				12
Threads		24				24
Base frequency		2,66 GHz				3,46 GHz
Turbo frequency		3,06 GHz				3,73 GHz
High performance cores		12 Cores 24 Threads @ 2,66 / 3,06 GHz				12 Cores 24 Threads @ 3,46 / 3,73 GHz
Bus speed		12,8 GT/s				12,8 GT/s
Cache memory		24 MB				24 MB
Max memory capacity		576 GB				576 GB
Memory types		DDR3 800/1066/1333				DDR3 800/1066/1333
Max # of memory channels		6				6
Max memory bandwidth		64 GB/s				64 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes		72				72
TDP		190 W				260 W
Suggested PSU		700W ATX Power Supply				800W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics		None				None
Socket		LGA1366				LGA1366
Compatible motherboard		Socket LGA 1366 Motherboard				Socket LGA 1366 Motherboard
Maximum temperature		81. 3°C				78.5°C
Crypto engine		AES New Instructions				AES New Instructions
Security		Trusted Execution Technology, Execute Disable Bit				Trusted Execution Technology, Execute Disable Bit
CPU-Z single thread		251				306
CPU-Z multi thread		3.781				4.930
Cinebench R15 single thread		91				110
Cinebench R15 multi-thread		1.279				1.470
Cinebench R20 single thread		191				120
Cinebench R20 multi-thread		2. 667				3.270
Cinebench R23 single thread		474				684
Cinebench R23 multi-thread		6.942				10.691
PassMark single thread		1.309				1.626
PassMark CPU Mark		10.472				12.615
(Linux) Geekbench 4 single core		2.432				2.937
(Linux) Geekbench 4 multi-core		19.909				20.033
(Linux) Geekbench 5 single core		540				614
(Linux) Geekbench 5 multi-core		5. 401				5.787
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance		167,8 GFLOPS				223,56 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio		105 pts / W				77 pts / W
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of Dual Intel Xeon X5690 is bigger, that the PDT of Dual Intel Xeon X5650 is lower. The Dual Intel Xeon X5690 was started more recently.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.

	CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
Dual Intel Xeon X5690	306 4.930
Dual Intel Xeon X5650	251 3.781

In single core, the difference is 22%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 30%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.

	Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Dual Intel Xeon X5690	110 1.470
Dual Intel Xeon X5650	91 1.279

In single core, the difference is 21%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 15%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.

	Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Dual Intel Xeon X5690	120 3.270
Dual Intel Xeon X5650	191 2.667

In single core, the difference is 59%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 23%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.

	Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Dual Intel Xeon X5690	684 10.691
Dual Intel Xeon X5650	474 6.942

In single core, the difference is 44%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 54%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.

	PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
Dual Intel Xeon X5690	1.626 12.615
Dual Intel Xeon X5650	1.309 10.472

In single core, the difference is 24%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 20%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows
Dual Intel Xeon X5690	2.710 22.429
Dual Intel Xeon X5650	2.243 16.320

In single core, the difference is 21%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 37%.

On Linux:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux
Dual Intel Xeon X5690	2.937 20.033
Dual Intel Xeon X5650	2. 432 19.909

In single core, the difference is 21%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 1%.

On Mac OS X:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X
Dual Intel Xeon X5690	2.930 23.996
Dual Intel Xeon X5650	2.507 21.266

In single core, the difference is 17%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 13%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

On Windows:

	Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows
Dual Intel Xeon X5690	645 6.168
Dual Intel Xeon X5650	481 4.029

In single core, the difference is 34%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 53%.

On Linux:

	Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux
Dual Intel Xeon X5690	614 5.787
Dual Intel Xeon X5650	540 5.401

In single core, the difference is 14%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 7%.

On macOS:

	Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — macOS
Dual Intel Xeon X5690	665 5.628
Dual Intel Xeon X5650	533 5.178

In single core, the difference is 25%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 9%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.