Xeon 2630 vs fx 6100: AMD FX-6100 vs Intel Xeon E5-2630: What is the difference?

AMD FX-6100 vs Intel Xeon E5-2630: What is the difference?

36points

AMD FX-6100

35points

Intel Xeon E5-2630

64 facts in comparison

AMD FX-6100

Intel Xeon E5-2630

Why is AMD FX-6100 better than Intel Xeon E5-2630?

43.48% faster CPU speed?
6 x 3.3GHzvs6 x 2.3GHz
533MHz higher ram speed?
1866MHzvs1333MHz
4.5MB bigger L2 cache?
6MBvs1.5MB
1.1GHz higher turbo clock speed?
3.9GHzvs2.8GHz
Has an unlocked multiplier?
0.75MB/core more L2 cache per core?
1MB/corevs0.25MB/core
Has F16C?
Has FMA4?

Why is Intel Xeon E5-2630 better than AMD FX-6100?

6 more CPU threads?
12vs6
1.6x higher PassMark result?
8634vs5406
7MB bigger L3 cache?
15MBvs8MB
1 newer version of PCI Express (PCIe)?
3vs2
96KB bigger L1 cache?
384KBvs288KB
21. 6GB/s more memory bandwidth?
42.6GB/svs21GB/s
17.05% higher PassMark result (single)?
1407vs1202
2 more memory channels?
4vs2

Which are the most popular comparisons?

AMD FX-6100

Intel Core i5-4440

Intel Xeon E5-2630

Intel Xeon E5-2603

AMD FX-6100

AMD FX-6300

Intel Xeon E5-2630

Intel Xeon E5-2650

AMD FX-6100

Intel Core i5-11600K

Intel Xeon E5-2630

Intel Xeon E5-4620

AMD FX-6100

AMD FX-4300

Intel Xeon E5-2630

Intel Xeon W-2155

AMD FX-6100

Intel Core i5-4570

Intel Xeon E5-2630

Intel Xeon E5-2660

AMD FX-6100

Intel Core i5-3470

Intel Xeon E5-2630

Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5

AMD FX-6100

Intel Core i3-3220

Intel Xeon E5-2630

Intel Xeon E5-1650

AMD FX-6100

Intel Core i5-9400F

Intel Xeon E5-2630

Intel Xeon E5-2630L

AMD FX-6100

Intel Core i3-8300

Intel Xeon E5-2630

Intel Xeon E5-2620

AMD FX-6100

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

Intel Xeon E5-2630

Intel Xeon E5-2640

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

AMD FX-6100

1 User reviews

AMD FX-6100

7. 0/10

1 User reviews

Intel Xeon E5-2630

0 User reviews

Intel Xeon E5-2630

0.0/10

0 User reviews

Features

Value for money

8.0/10

1 votes

No reviews yet

Gaming

7.0/10

1 votes

No reviews yet

Performance

6.0/10

1 votes

No reviews yet

Reliability

8.0/10

1 votes

No reviews yet

Energy efficiency

7.0/10

1 votes

No reviews yet

Performance

1.CPU speed

6 x 3.3GHz

6 x 2.3GHz

The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.

2. CPU threads

More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.

3.turbo clock speed

3.9GHz

2.8GHz

When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

4.Has an unlocked multiplier

✔AMD FX-6100

✖Intel Xeon E5-2630

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.

5.L2 cache

A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

6.L3 cache

A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

7.L1 cache

A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

8.L2 core

1MB/core

0. 25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

9.L3 core

1.33MB/core

2.5MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

Memory

1.RAM speed

1866MHz

1333MHz

It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

21GB/s

42.6GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.DDR memory version

DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.

4.memory channels

More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.

5. maximum memory amount

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6100)

The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.

6.bus transfer rate

5.4GT/s

7.2GT/s

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7.Supports ECC memory

✖AMD FX-6100

✔Intel Xeon E5-2630

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6100)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E5-2630)

A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.

9.bus speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6100)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E5-2630)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

Benchmarks

1.PassMark result

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.

2.PassMark result (single)

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6100)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E5-2630)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6100)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E5-2630)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 (single) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6100)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E5-2630)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6100)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E5-2630)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7.Blender (bmw27) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6100)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E5-2630)

The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

8.Blender (classroom) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6100)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E5-2630)

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

9.performance per watt

This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.

Features

1.uses multithreading

✖AMD FX-6100

✔Intel Xeon E5-2630

Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.

2.Has AES

✔AMD FX-6100

✔Intel Xeon E5-2630

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3.Has AVX

✔AMD FX-6100

✔Intel Xeon E5-2630

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.

4.SSE version

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5.Has F16C

✔AMD FX-6100

✖Intel Xeon E5-2630

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

6.bits executed at a time

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6100)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E5-2630)

NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.

7.Has MMX

✔AMD FX-6100

✔Intel Xeon E5-2630

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

8.Has TrustZone

✖AMD FX-6100

✖Intel Xeon E5-2630

A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).

9.front-end width

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6100)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E5-2630)

The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best CPUs?

Intel Xeon E5-2630 vs AMD FX-6100

Intel Xeon E5-2630 vs AMD FX-6100

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Xeon E5-2630 on one side and the AMD FX-6100 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the server sector, It has 6 cores, 12 threads, a maximum frequency of 2,8GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 6 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,9 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specifications:

Processor	Intel Xeon E5-2630	AMD FX-6100
Market (main)	Server	Desktop
ISA	x86-64 (64 bit)	x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture	Sandy Bridge	Bulldozer
Core name	Sandy Bridge-EP	Zamberi
Family	Xeon E5-2600	FX-6000
Part number(s), S-Spec	BX80621E52630, CM8062101038801, QB7X, QBF1, QBV3, SR0H6, SR0KV	FD6100WMGUSBX, FD6100WMW6KGU
Release date	Q1 2012	Q4 2011
Lithography	32 nm	32 nm SOI
Transistors	2. 270.000.000	1.200.000.000
Cores	6	6
Threads	12	6
Base frequency	2,3 GHz	3,3 GHz
Turbo frequency	2,8 GHz	3,9 GHz
Cache memory	15 MB	8 MB
Max memory capacity	384 GB	16 GB
Memory types	DDR3 800/1066/1333	DDR3-1866
Max # of memory channels	4	2
Max memory bandwidth	42,6 GB/s	29,9 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes	40	16
TDP	95 W	95 W
Suggested PSU	600W ATX Power Supply	600W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics	None	None
Socket	LGA2011	AM3+
Compatible motherboard	Socket LGA 2011 Motherboard	Socket AM3+ Motherboard
Maximum temperature	77. 4°C	70°C
CPU-Z single thread	243	169
CPU-Z multi thread	1.676	875
Cinebench R15 single thread	98	73
Cinebench R15 multi-thread	676	355
PassMark single thread	1.285	1.297
PassMark CPU Mark	6.104	3.617
(Linux 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core	2.520	2.268
(Linux 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core	10. 086	5.506
(Linux) Geekbench 5 single core	504	499
(Linux) Geekbench 5 multi-core	2.837	1.478
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance	131,6 GFLOPS	39,2 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio	106 pts / W	58 pts / W
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of AMD FX-6100 is bigger, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The Intel Xeon E5-2630 was designed earlier.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

	CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Xeon E5-2630	243 1. 676
AMD FX-6100	169 875

In single core, the difference is 44%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 92%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.

	Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Xeon E5-2630	98 676
AMD FX-6100	73 355

In single core, the difference is 34%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 90%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.

	PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
Intel Xeon E5-2630	1.285 6.104
AMD FX-6100	1.297 3.617

In single core, the difference is -1%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 69%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit
Intel Xeon E5-2630	2.487 12.226
AMD FX-6100	2.186 7.000

In single core, the difference is 14%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 75%.

On Linux 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit
Intel Xeon E5-2630	2. 520 10.086
AMD FX-6100	2.268 5.506

In single core, the difference is 11%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 83%.

On Mac OS X 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit
Intel Xeon E5-2630	2.374 12.234
AMD FX-6100	2.035 6.628

In single core, the difference is 17%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 85%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

On Windows:

	Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows
Intel Xeon E5-2630	475 2.882
AMD FX-6100	454 1.720

In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 68%.

On Linux:

	Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux
Intel Xeon E5-2630	504 2.837
AMD FX-6100	499 1.478

In single core, the difference is 1%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 92%.

On macOS:

	Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — macOS
Intel Xeon E5-2630	337 2.554
AMD FX-6100	393 1.687

In single core, the difference is -14%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 51%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.

Equivalence:

Intel Xeon E5-2630 AMD equivalentAMD FX-6100 Intel equivalent

Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 vs AMD FX-6100

Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 vs AMD FX-6100

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 on one side and the AMD FX-6100 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the server sector, It has 8 cores, 16 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,2GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 6 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,9 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Specifications:

Processor	Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3	AMD FX-6100
Market (main)	Server	Desktop
ISA	x86-64 (64 bit)	x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture	Haswell	Bulldozer
Core name	Haswell-EP	Zamberi
Family	Xeon E5-2600 v3	FX-6000
Part number(s), S-Spec	BX80644E52630V3, CM8064401831000, QGZX, SR206	FD6100WMGUSBX, FD6100WMW6KGU
Release date	Q3 2014	Q4 2011
Lithography	22 nm	32 nm SOI
Transistors	—	1. 200.000.000
Cores	8	6
Threads	16	6
Base frequency	2,4 GHz	3,3 GHz
Turbo frequency	3,2 GHz	3,9 GHz
Cache memory	20 MB	8 MB
Max memory capacity	768 GB	16 GB
Memory types	DDR4 1600/1866	DDR3-1866
Max # of memory channels	4	2
Max memory bandwidth	59 GB/s	29,9 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes	40	16
TDP	85 W	95 W
Suggested PSU	600W ATX Power Supply	600W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics	None	None
Socket	LGA2011-3	AM3+
Compatible motherboard	Socket LGA 2011-3 Motherboard	Socket AM3+ Motherboard
Maximum temperature	72. 1°C	70°C
CPU-Z single thread	295	169
CPU-Z multi thread	3.043	875
Cinebench R15 single thread	162	73
Cinebench R15 multi-thread	1.056	355
PassMark single thread	1.757	1.297
PassMark CPU Mark	10.072	3.617
(Linux 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core	3.630	2.268
(Linux 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core	19. 614	5.506
(Linux) Geekbench 5 single core	795	499
(Linux) Geekbench 5 multi-core	5.303	1.478
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance	431,2 GFLOPS	39,2 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio	231 pts / W	58 pts / W
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

The processor Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 has more cores, the turbo frequency of AMD FX-6100 is bigger, that the PDT of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 is lower. The Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 was designed earlier.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

	CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3	295 3. 043
AMD FX-6100	169 875

In single core, the difference is 75%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 248%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

	Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3	162 1.056
AMD FX-6100	73 355

In single core, the difference is 122%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 197%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

	PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3	1.757 10.072
AMD FX-6100	1.297 3.617

In single core, the difference is 35%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 178%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

On Windows 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3	3.606 21.222
AMD FX-6100	2.186 7.000

In single core, the difference is 65%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 203%.

On Linux 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3	3.630 19.614
AMD FX-6100	2.268 5.506

In single core, the difference is 60%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 256%.

On Mac OS X 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3	3.537 19.718
AMD FX-6100	2.035 6.628

In single core, the difference is 74%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 197%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

On Windows:

	Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3	750 5.173
AMD FX-6100	454 1.720

In single core, the difference is 65%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 201%.

On Linux:

	Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3	795 5.303
AMD FX-6100	499 1.478

In single core, the difference is 59%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 259%.

On Android:

	Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Android
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3	750 4.558
AMD FX-6100	362 1.429

In single core, the difference is 107%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 219%.

On macOS:

	Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — macOS
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3	817 5. 189
AMD FX-6100	393 1.687

In single core, the difference is 108%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 208%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Equivalence:

Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 AMD equivalentAMD FX-6100 Intel equivalent

Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 vs Intel Core i3-6100

Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 and Intel Core i3-6100 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).

Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3

Buy on Amazon

Intel Core i3-6100

Buy on Amazon

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3

6 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 2
12 more threads: 16 vs 4
Around 11% higher maximum core temperature: 72. 1°C vs 65°C
12x more maximum memory size: 768 GB vs 64 GB
4.1x better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 17069 vs 4153
2.7x better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 5264 vs 1976

Number of cores	8 vs 2
Number of threads	16 vs 4
Maximum core temperature	72.1°C vs 65°C
Maximum memory size	768 GB vs 64 GB
Max number of CPUs in a configuration	2 vs 1
PassMark — CPU mark	17069 vs 4153
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	5264 vs 1976

Reasons to consider the Intel Core i3-6100

Around 16% higher clock speed: 3. 7 GHz vs 3.20 GHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 22 nm
Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 51 Watt vs 85 Watt
Around 28% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 2209 vs 1721
Around 27% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 906 vs 711

Maximum frequency	3.7 GHz vs 3.20 GHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 22 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	51 Watt vs 85 Watt
PassMark — Single thread mark	2209 vs 1721
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	906 vs 711

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
CPU 2: Intel Core i3-6100

PassMark — Single thread mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

PassMark — CPU mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

Geekbench 4 — Single Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

Name	Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3	Intel Core i3-6100
PassMark — Single thread mark	1721	2209
PassMark — CPU mark	17069	4153
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	711	906
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	5264	1976
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score		2255
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)		2.581
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		47.944
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.3
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)		1.387
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		3.445
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		1558
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)		3264
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)		5567
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		1558
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)		3264
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)		5567

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3	Intel Core i3-6100
Architecture codename	Haswell	Skylake
Launch date	Q3’14	September 2015
Place in performance rating	986	1000
Processor Number	E5-2630V3	i3-6100
Series	Intel® Xeon® Processor E5 v3 Family	6th Generation Intel® Core™ i3 Processors
Status	Launched	Launched
Vertical segment	Server	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$110
Price now		$147. 49
Value for money (0-100)		10.96
64 bit support
Base frequency	2.40 GHz	3.70 GHz
Bus Speed	8 GT/s QPI	8 GT/s DMI3
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm	14 nm
Maximum core temperature	72.1°C	65°C
Maximum frequency	3. 20 GHz	3.7 GHz
Number of cores	8	2
Number of QPI Links	2
Number of threads	16	4
VID voltage range	0.65V–1.30V
Die size		150 mm
L1 cache		64 KB (per core)
L2 cache		256 KB (per core)
L3 cache		4096 KB (shared)
Maximum case temperature (TCase)		65 °C
Transistor count		1400 million
Max memory channels	4	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	59 GB/s	34. 1 GB/s
Maximum memory size	768 GB	64 GB
Supported memory types	DDR4 1600/1866	DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V
ECC memory support
Low Halogen Options Available
Max number of CPUs in a configuration	2	1
Package Size	52.5mm x 45mm	37.5mm x 37.5mm
Sockets supported	FCLGA2011-3	FCLGA1151
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt	51 Watt
Thermal Solution		PCG 2015C (65W)
Max number of PCIe lanes	40	16
PCI Express revision	3. 0	3.0
PCIe configurations	x4, x8, x16	Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4
Scalability	2S	1S Only
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Identity Protection technology
Intel® OS Guard
Intel® Secure Key technology
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)
Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX)
Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX)
Secure Boot
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
Idle States
Instruction set extensions	Intel® AVX2	Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
Intel 64
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Intel® Flex Memory Access
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® TSX-NI
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
Physical Address Extensions (PAE)	46-bit
Thermal Monitoring
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP)
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)
Device ID		0x1912
Graphics base frequency		350 MHz
Graphics max dynamic frequency		1. 05 GHz
Graphics max frequency		1.05 GHz
Intel® Clear Video HD technology
Intel® Clear Video technology
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology
Intel® Quick Sync Video
Max video memory		64 GB
Processor graphics		Intel® HD Graphics 530
DisplayPort
DVI
eDP
HDMI
Number of displays supported		3
Wireless Display (WiDi) support
4K resolution support
Max resolution over DisplayPort		[email protected]
Max resolution over eDP		[email protected]
Max resolution over HDMI 1. 4		[email protected]
Max resolution over VGA		N / A
Max resolution over WiDi		1080p
DirectX		12
OpenGL		4.5

AMD FX-8150 vs. Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2

AMD FX-8150

The AMD FX-8150 operates with 8 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 4.20 GHz base 4.20 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 125 W.The processor is attached to the AM3+ CPU socket. This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-1866 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Vishera (Bulldozer) Architecture is enhanced with 32 nm technology and supports AMD-V. The product was launched on Q4/2011

Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2

The Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 operates with 6 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 3.10 GHz base 2.80 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 80 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 2011 CPU socket. This version includes 15.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 4 memory channels to support DDR3-1600 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 40 lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Ivy Bridge EP Architecture is enhanced with 22 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q3/2013

AMD FX-8150

Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2

Compare Detail

3.60 GHz	Frequency	2.60 GHz
8	Cores	6
4.20 GHz	Turbo (1 Core)	3. 10 GHz
4.20 GHz	Turbo (All Cores)	2.80 GHz
No	Hyperthreading	Yes
Yes	Overclocking	No
normal	Core Architecture	normal
no iGPU	GPU	no iGPU
No turbo	GPU (Turbo)	No turbo
32 nm	Technology	22 nm
No turbo	GPU (Turbo)	No turbo
	DirectX Version
	Max. displays
DDR3-1866	Memory	DDR3-1600
2	Memory channels	4
	Max memory
Yes	ECC	Yes
—	L2 Cache	—
8.00 MB	L3 Cache	15.00 MB
	PCIe version	3.0
	PCIe lanes	40
32 nm	Technology	22 nm
AM3+	Socket	LGA 2011
125 W	TDP	80 W
AMD-V	Virtualization	VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Q4/2011	Release date	Q3/2013
Show more data		Show more data

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11. 5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Electric Usage Estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)

Power cost, dollar per kWh

Electric Usage Estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)

Power cost, dollar per kWh

AMD FX-8150		Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2
125 W	Max TDP	80 W
NA	Power consumption per day (kWh)	NA
NA	Running cost per day	NA
NA	Power consumption per year (kWh)	NA
NA	Running cost per year	NA

Popular Comparision

Comments

[PDF] CPU Benchmarks Over 600,000 CPUs Benchmarked

1 1 z :41 Home Software Hardware Benchmarks Services Store Support Forums About Us Home» CPU Benchmarks» Hig. ..

PassMark Intel vs AMD CPU Benchmarks — High End

1 z 12

Home

Software

Hardware

https://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html

Benchmarks

Services

Store

Support

Forums

About Us

Home » CPU Benchmarks » High End CPUs

CPU Benchmarks

—-Select A Page —-

Over 600,000 CPUs Benchmarked High End CPUs — Intel vs AMD This chart comparing high end CPUs is made using thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and is updated daily. These are the high end AMD and Intel CPUs are typically those found in newer computers. The chart below compares the performance of Intel Xeon CPUs, Intel Core i7 CPUs, AMD Phenom II CPUs and AMD Opterons with multiple

How does your CPU compare? Add your CPU to our benchmark chart with PerformanceTest V8!

cores. Intel processors vs AMD chips — find out which CPUs performance is best for your new gaming rig or server!

CPU Mark | Price Performance (Click to select desired chart)

Rank: 397 Number of Samples: 119 Number of Cores: 4 (2 logical per)

PassMark — CPU Mark High End CPUs — Updated 12th of September 2016 Price (USD) Intel Xeon E5-2679 v4 @ 2. 50GHz

Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4 @ 2.20GHz

Intel Xeon E5-2697 v4 @ 2.30GHz

$2,792.61

Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4 @ 2.60GHz

Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz

$3,800.00

Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 @ 2.30GHz

Intel Xeon E5-2696 v4 @ 2.20GHz

Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 @ 2.30GHz

$2,660.00

Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 @ 2.60GHz

$2,740.00

Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 @ 2.20GHz

$4,699.95

Intel Xeon E5-2695 v3 @ 2.30GHz

$2,632.00

Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz

Intel Xeon E5-2687W v4 @ 3.00GHz

Intel Core i7-6950X @ 3.00GHz

$1,649.99

Intel Xeon E5-2686 v3 @ 2.00GHz

Intel Xeon E5-2689 v4 @ 3.10GHz

Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 @ 2.60GHz

$2,054.00

Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 @ 2.10GHz

$2,842.95

Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz

$1,500.00

Intel Xeon E5-1681 v3 @ 2.90GHz

Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 @ 2. 00GHz

$2,128.88*

Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 @ 3.10GHz

$2,179.99

Intel Xeon E5-2676 v3 @ 2.40GHz

Intel Core i7-6900K @ 3.20GHz

$1,074.37

Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 @ 2.70GHz

$2,579.95

2016-09-12 13:41

PassMark Intel vs AMD CPU Benchmarks — High End

2 z 12

https://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html

Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 @ 3.00GHz

Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3 @ 3.20GHz

Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 @ 2.40GHz

Intel Xeon E5-2696 v2 @ 2.50GHz

Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz

$2,335.05*

Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 @ 3.40GHz

$2,321.48

Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 @ 2.50GHz

Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 @ 2.30GHz

$1,600.00

Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 @ 3.30GHz

$2,282.14

Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz

$1,779.95

Intel Xeon E5-2673 v2 @ 3.30GHz

Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 @ 2.20GHz

Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 @ 2. 60GHz

$1,440.00

Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz

$2,110.00

Intel Core i7-5960X @ 3.00GHz

$1,015.99

Intel Xeon E5-2675 v3 @ 1.80GHz

Intel Xeon E5-2658 v3 @ 2.20GHz

Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 @ 2.40GHz

$2,448.49*

Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4 @ 2.40GHz

Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 @ 2.30GHz

$1,055.00

Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 @ 2.50GHz

$1,577.26

Intel Xeon E5-2692 v2 @ 2.20GHz

Number of Cores: 4 (2 logical per)

Intel Xeon E5-2687W @ 3.10GHz

$2,215.07

Intel Xeon E5-2690 @ 2.90GHz

$835.75

Intel Xeon E5-2643 v4 @ 3.40GHz

Intel Core i7-6850K @ 3.60GHz

$609.99

Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4 @ 2.20GHz

Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 @ 2.60GHz

$978.45

Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 @ 3.60GHz

Intel Xeon E5-1660 v3 @ 3.00GHz

$1,229.00

Intel Core i7-4960X @ 3.60GHz

$1,024.99*

Intel Xeon E5-2658 v2 @ 2. 40GHz

Intel Xeon E5-2689 @ 2.60GHz

Intel Xeon E5-2663 v3 @ 2.80GHz

Intel Xeon E5-1660 v2 @ 3.70GHz

$1,767.05

Intel Xeon E5-2643 v3 @ 3.40GHz

$1,609.00

Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 @ 2.20GHz

$1,535.90*

Intel Core i7-5930K @ 3.50GHz

$579.99

Intel Core i7-6800K @ 3.40GHz

$438.07

Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 @ 3.50GHz

$644.41

Intel Xeon E5-2650L v3 @ 1.80GHz

Intel Core i7-4930K @ 3.40GHz

$1,317.99

Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz

$1,125.00

Intel Core i7-5820K @ 3.30GHz

$389.99

Intel Xeon E5-2680 @ 2.70GHz

$309.00

Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 @ 2.40GHz

$764.16

Intel Core i7-3960X @ 3.30GHz

$839.81

Intel Core i7-3970X @ 3.50GHz

$1,377.90*

Intel Xeon E5-1660 @ 3.30GHz

$1,104.00*

Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 @ 3.50GHz

$625.49

2016-09-12 13:41

PassMark Intel vs AMD CPU Benchmarks — High End

3 z 12

https://www. cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html

Intel Xeon E5-2670 @ 2.60GHz

$356.82

Intel Xeon E5-2665 @ 2.40GHz

$1,085.88*

Intel Core i7-3930K @ 3.20GHz

$586.24

Intel Xeon E5-2648L v3 @ 1.80GHz

Intel Xeon E5-4650 @ 2.70GHz

$3,899.99*

Intel Xeon E5-1650 @ 3.20GHz

$660.44

Intel Xeon E5-2643 v2 @ 3.50GHz

$1,679.70

Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz

Intel Xeon E5-2660 @ 2.20GHz

$154.99

Intel Xeon D-1541 @ 2.10GHz

Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4.00GHz

$339.99

Intel Xeon E5-2651 v2 @ 1.80GHz

Intel Core i7-5775C @ 3.30GHz

$365.99

Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.00GHz

$339.99

Intel Core i7-5950HQ @ 2.90GHz

Intel Core i7-5775R @ 3.30GHz

Intel Xeon D-1540 @ 2.00GHz

Intel Core i7-995X @ 3.60GHz

Intel Xeon E5-2650 @ 2.00GHz

$262.00

Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 @ 2.60GHz

$619. 99

Intel Core i7-3740 @ 3.40GHz

Intel Xeon E5-2667 @ 2.90GHz

Number of Cores: 4 (2 logical per) $2,410.00*

Intel Xeon E3-1285L v3 @ 3.10GHz

Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 @ 3.70GHz

$411.99

Intel Xeon E3-1545M v5 @ 2.90GHz

Intel Xeon E5-2637 v3 @ 3.50GHz

$1,459.95

AMD FX-9590 Eight-Core

$223.95

Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 @ 3.70GHz

Intel Xeon E3-1276 v3 @ 3.60GHz

$359.99

Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5 @ 3.60GHz

Intel Xeon E5-2450 @ 2.10GHz

$503.50

Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 @ 3.50GHz

Intel Core i7-4770K @ 3.50GHz

$411.99

AMD Opteron 6380

$1,110.99

Intel Xeon E3-1281 v3 @ 3.70GHz

$455.00*

Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5 @ 3.50GHz

Intel Core i7-4980HQ @ 2.80GHz

Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3 @ 3.50GHz

$282.43

Intel Core i7-4790 @ 3.60GHz

$299.99

Intel Core i7-6700 @ 3.40GHz

$304. 99

Intel Xeon E3-1271 v3 @ 3.60GHz

$356.34

Intel Xeon E3-1246 v3 @ 3.50GHz

$299.99

Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz

$413.99

Intel Xeon E3-1290 V2 @ 3.70GHz

$885.00*

Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 @ 3.60GHz

$364.90

Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 @ 2.00GHz

$889.99

Intel Core i7-4771 @ 3.50GHz

$305.58

Intel Core i7-4770R @ 3.20GHz

Intel Core i7-4960HQ @ 2.60GHz

$623.00*

Intel Core i7-4770 @ 3.40GHz

$306.99

2016-09-12 13:41

PassMark Intel vs AMD CPU Benchmarks — High End

4 z 12

https://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html

Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3 @ 3.50GHz

$421.00

Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 @ 3.50GHz

$370.00

Intel Core i7-4820K @ 3.70GHz

$406.89

Intel Xeon E3-1280 V2 @ 3.60GHz

$644.99*

Intel Xeon E5-2640 @ 2.50GHz

$315.00

Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 @ 3.40GHz

$312.94*

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 @ 3.50GHz

$307. 99

Intel Core i7-4940MX @ 3.10GHz

$1,008.95*

Intel Xeon E5-2637 v4 @ 3.50GHz

$1,075.00

Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 @ 3.60GHz

$800.49*

Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3 @ 3.40GHz

$264.99

Intel Core i7-4790S @ 3.20GHz

$304.99

Intel Core i7-6920HQ @ 2.90GHz

Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.50GHz

$560.50

Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5 @ 3.40GHz

Intel Xeon E3-1245 v3 @ 3.40GHz

$315.00

Intel Core i7-4930MX @ 3.00GHz

$1,096.00*

Intel Xeon W3690 @ 3.47GHz

$1,635.49

AMD FX-9370 Eight-Core

$189.99

Intel Xeon E5-2658 @ 2.10GHz

$1,462.00

Intel Xeon E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz

$421.00

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 @ 3.70GHz Intel Core i7-6770HQ @ 2.60GHz

Number of Cores: 4 (2 logical per)

$314.99 $1,009.00

AMD Opteron 6376

$699.99

Intel Core i7-4910MQ @ 2.90GHz

$572.99*

Intel Core i7-5850HQ @ 2.70GHz

Intel Xeon E3-1286 v3 @ 3. 70GHz

Intel Core i7-3940XM @ 3.00GHz

$549.99*

Intel Core i7-4870HQ @ 2.50GHz

Intel Core i7-3770 @ 3.40GHz

$335.55

Intel Xeon E5-2637 v2 @ 3.50GHz

$1,125.92*

Intel Xeon E3-1275 V2 @ 3.50GHz

$424.47

Intel Xeon E5-2440 @ 2.40GHz

$745.00*

Intel Core i7-4770S @ 3.10GHz

$295.99

Intel Xeon W3680 @ 3.33GHz

$353.43

Intel Core i7-4860HQ @ 2.40GHz

Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3 @ 3.30GHz

$305.45

Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 @ 2.90GHz

Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2 @ 3.40GHz

$437.83

Intel Core i7-990X @ 3.47GHz

$1,509.99

Intel Core i7-3920XM @ 2.90GHz

$1,096.00*

Intel Xeon X5690 @ 3.47GHz

$280.00

AMD Opteron 6282 SE

$1,089.99*

Intel Xeon E5-1620 @ 3.60GHz

$250.88

Intel Core i7-4790T @ 2.70GHz

Intel Core i7-4850HQ @ 2.30GHz

$434.00*

Intel Xeon E3-1245 V2 @ 3.40GHz

$607. 59

Intel Core i7-4900MQ @ 2.80GHz

$635.70*

Intel Core i7-6820HK @ 2.70GHz

Intel Xeon E5-2623 v3 @ 3.00GHz

$481.49

2016-09-12 13:41

PassMark Intel vs AMD CPU Benchmarks — High End

5 z 12

https://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html

Intel Core i7-3820 @ 3.60GHz

$404.38

AMD Opteron 6276

$99.25

Intel Core i7-980X @ 3.33GHz

$499.00

Intel Xeon X5680 @ 3.33GHz

$185.00

AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core

$149.99

Intel Core i7-4770HQ @ 2.20GHz

Intel Core i7-6700T @ 2.80GHz

$1,103.82*

Intel Xeon E5-2630 @ 2.30GHz

$500.00

AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core

$184.99

Intel Core i7-3770S @ 3.10GHz

$359.99

Intel Core i7-3840QM @ 2.80GHz

$504.75*

Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2 @ 3.30GHz

$286.81

Intel Core i7-980 @ 3.33GHz

$1,108.95*

Intel Core i7-2700K @ 3.50GHz

$279.99*

Intel Core i7-4810MQ @ 2.80GHz

$664. 62*

Intel Xeon E3-1290 @ 3.60GHz

$885.00*

Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 @ 2.50GHz

$508.95

Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz

$404.99

Intel Core i7-6820HQ @ 2.70GHz

Intel Core i7-4770T @ 2.50GHz

$381.74*

Intel Xeon E3-1275L v3 @ 2.70GHz

Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 @ 2.20GHz Intel Xeon X5675 @ 3.07GHz

Number of Cores: 4 (2 logical per)

$439.99 $178.53

Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 @ 2.80GHz

Intel Core i7-970 @ 3.20GHz

$595.40

Intel Core i7-4800MQ @ 2.70GHz

$509.95*

Intel Core i7-2600K @ 3.40GHz

$559.97

Intel Core i7-3820QM @ 2.70GHz

$602.97*

Intel Xeon E3-1280 @ 3.50GHz

$989.11

Intel Xeon E5-2643 @ 3.30GHz

$550.00

Intel Xeon W3670 @ 3.20GHz

$964.60*

Intel Core i7-5700HQ @ 2.70GHz

Intel Core i7-3740QM @ 2.70GHz

$409.00*

Intel Xeon E3-1275 @ 3.40GHz

$363.94

Intel Xeon E5-2430 v2 @ 2. 50GHz

$626.27

Intel Xeon E3-1270 @ 3.40GHz

$403.87*

Intel Core i7-4750HQ @ 2.00GHz

Intel Core i7-2600 @ 3.40GHz

$214.99

Intel Core i7-5700EQ @ 2.60GHz

Intel Core i7-3770T @ 2.50GHz

$329.99*

Intel Core i7-3720QM @ 2.60GHz

$375.17*

Intel Xeon X5670 @ 2.93GHz

$109.98

Intel Xeon E3-1245 @ 3.30GHz

$324.73

Intel Core i7-4722HQ @ 2.40GHz

Intel Core i7-4720HQ @ 2.60GHz

Intel Core i5-5675C @ 3.10GHz

$289.99

AMD FX-8320 Eight-Core

$134.99

Intel Core i7-6700HQ @ 2.60GHz

$1,509.00*

Intel Xeon E3-1240 @ 3.30GHz

$305.76

Intel Core i7-4710MQ @ 2.50GHz

$288.00*

2016-09-12 13:41

PassMark Intel vs AMD CPU Benchmarks — High End

6 z 12

https://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html

Intel Xeon E5-2620 @ 2.00GHz

$407.19

Intel Xeon X5660 @ 2.80GHz

$98.55

Intel Xeon E3-1230 @ 3. 20GHz

$274.29

Intel Xeon E5-2630L @ 2.00GHz

Intel Core i7-4760HQ @ 2.10GHz

Intel Core i7-4710HQ @ 2.50GHz

AMD Opteron 6328

$611.23

Intel Core i5-6600K @ 3.50GHz

$234.99

Intel Xeon E3-1235 @ 3.20GHz

$478.18*

Intel Core i7-4700HQ @ 2.40GHz

$383.00*

AMD FX-8370E Eight-Core

$195.14

Intel Core i7-4700MQ @ 2.40GHz

$467.40

Intel Xeon E3-1265L V2 @ 2.50GHz

$732.58*

Intel Core i5-4690K @ 3.50GHz

$239.99

AMD FX-8310 Eight-Core

AMD FX-8150 Eight-Core

$165.99*

Intel Core i5-6600 @ 3.30GHz

$227.33

Intel Core i7-3630QM @ 2.40GHz

$304.49*

AMD FX-8300 Eight-Core

$109.99

Intel Core i5-4670K @ 3.40GHz

$268.26

Intel Xeon X5650 @ 2.67GHz

$84.95

Intel Core i5-4690 @ 3.50GHz

Number of Cores: 4 (2 logical per)

$224.99

Intel Core i7-4785T @ 2.20GHz

Intel Core i7-4702HQ @ 2. 20GHz

Intel Xeon E3-1240L v3 @ 2.00GHz

Intel Core i7-4712HQ @ 2.30GHz

Intel Core i7-3610QM @ 2.30GHz

$399.99*

AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core

$139.99

Intel Xeon E3-1226 v3 @ 3.30GHz

$234.99

Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 @ 3.30GHz

Intel Core i7-3615QM @ 2.30GHz

Intel Xeon E3-1230L v3 @ 1.80GHz

Intel Core i5-4670 @ 3.40GHz

$226.99

Intel Core i5-4690S @ 3.20GHz

$219.99

Intel Core i7-4700EQ @ 2.40GHz

Intel Xeon E5-1410 @ 2.80GHz

Intel Core i7-4765T @ 2.00GHz

Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5 @ 3.00GHz

Intel Xeon X5687 @ 3.60GHz

$165.00

Intel Core i5-4590 @ 3.30GHz

$199.99

Intel Core i7-2960XM @ 2.70GHz

$1,096.00*

Intel Core i7-4702MQ @ 2.20GHz

Intel Xeon E5-2420 @ 1.90GHz

$414.25

Intel Core i7-4712MQ @ 2.30GHz

Intel Core i5-3570K @ 3.40GHz

$438. 99

Intel Core i7-2860QM @ 2.50GHz

$599.99*

Intel Xeon E5649 @ 2.53GHz

$98.00*

Intel Core i7-4770TE @ 2.30GHz

Intel Core i7-2920XM @ 2.50GHz

$608.95*

Intel Core i7-2600S @ 2.80GHz

$215.00

2016-09-12 13:41

PassMark Intel vs AMD CPU Benchmarks — High End

7 z 12

https://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html

Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 @ 3.20GHz

$283.59

Intel Xeon L5639 @ 2.13GHz

Intel Core i5-6500 @ 3.20GHz

$204.72

Intel Core i5-6600T @ 2.70GHz

$472.40*

Intel Core i5-4570 @ 3.20GHz

$199.99

Intel Xeon X5677 @ 3.47GHz

$106.82*

Intel Core i5-3570 @ 3.40GHz

$307.35

AMD FX-6350 Six-Core

$119.99

Intel Core i5-4590S @ 3.00GHz

$209.99

Intel Core i7-3632QM @ 2.20GHz

$467.04*

Intel Xeon E5-2430 @ 2.20GHz

$346.00

Intel Core i5-5575R @ 2.80GHz

Intel Core i7-3612QM @ 2. 10GHz

Intel Xeon E5-1410 v2 @ 2.80GHz

Intel Core i5-3550 @ 3.30GHz

$219.00

Intel Core i5-3550S @ 3.00GHz

Intel Core i7-2840QM @ 2.40GHz

Intel Core i7-3615QE @ 2.30GHz

AMD Opteron 6272

$325.00

Intel Xeon E5-1607 v3 @ 3.10GHz

Intel Xeon E3-1225 V2 @ 3.20GHz

$506.59

Intel Core i5-6402P @ 2.80GHz

Number of Cores: 4 (2 logical per) $202.11*

Intel Core i5-2550K @ 3.40GHz

$309.00*

Intel Core i5-4690T @ 2.50GHz

Intel Core i7-2760QM @ 2.40GHz

$467.40*

Intel Core i7-3635QM @ 2.40GHz

Intel Core i7-2820QM @ 2.30GHz

$381.28*

Intel Core i5-4570S @ 2.90GHz

$194.99

Intel Core i5-4460 @ 3.20GHz

$189.99

Intel Xeon L5640 @ 2.27GHz

$94.99

AMD FX-8120 Eight-Core

$173.18*

Intel Core i5-3570S @ 3.10GHz

Intel Core i5-3470 @ 3.20GHz

$245.25

Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3 @ 3. 10GHz

$223.12

Intel Xeon E3-1260L @ 2.40GHz

$576.10*

Intel Xeon E3-1220 V2 @ 3.10GHz

$243.98

Intel Core i5-6400 @ 2.70GHz

$189.99

Intel Xeon X5672 @ 3.20GHz

$138.08*

Intel Core i5-4570R @ 2.70GHz

Intel Xeon E5645 @ 2.40GHz

$195.12

Intel Core i7-3612QE @ 2.10GHz

Intel Xeon W3580 @ 3.33GHz

$1,083.47*

Intel Core i5-3450 @ 3.10GHz

$204.99

Intel Core i5-2500K @ 3.30GHz

$309.00

Intel Core i5-4670S @ 3.10GHz

AMD Opteron 6174

$73.05

Intel Core i5-4440 @ 3.10GHz

$196.77

AMD Opteron 3380

Intel Core i5-3475S @ 2.90GHz

AMD FX-6300 Six-Core

$89.99

2016-09-12 13:41

PassMark Intel vs AMD CPU Benchmarks — High End

8 z 12

https://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html

Intel Core i5-6440HQ @ 2.60GHz

Intel Core i5-4460S @ 2.90GHz

Intel Core i7-975 @ 3. 33GHz

$299.00

Intel Core i5-4430 @ 3.00GHz

$184.99

Intel Core i5-2500 @ 3.30GHz

$208.15

Intel Core i5-4670T @ 2.30GHz

$282.00*

AMD FX-6130 Six-Core

Intel Xeon W3570 @ 3.20GHz

$584.95*

Intel Core i7-3610QE @ 2.30GHz

Intel Core i5-3470S @ 2.90GHz

$209.99

Intel Xeon W5590 @ 3.33GHz

$1,759.40*

Intel Core i5-4440S @ 2.80GHz

$184.40

Intel Core i7-2720QM @ 2.20GHz

$197.57

AMD FX-8100 Eight-Core

$142.00*

AMD FX-6200 Six-Core

$119.99

Intel Core i5-3350P @ 3.10GHz

$275.00

Intel Core i3-6320 @ 3.90GHz

$159.99

Intel Core i5-2450P @ 3.20GHz

$214.99*

Intel Core i5-3450S @ 2.80GHz

$189.99

Intel Xeon E3-1265L @ 2.40GHz

$717.75*

Intel Xeon X5647 @ 2.93GHz

$1,207.50*

Intel Xeon E3-1220 @ 3.10GHz Intel Xeon W3565 @ 3.20GHz

Number of Cores: 4 (2 logical per)

$225.36 $322. 99*

Intel Core i5-3340 @ 3.10GHz

$185.00

AMD Opteron 6234

$399.99*

Intel Xeon X3480 @ 3.07GHz

Intel Xeon E3-1225 @ 3.10GHz

$239.71

Intel Core i7-2670QM @ 2.20GHz

$378.00*

Intel Core i5-4430S @ 2.70GHz

Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 @ 3.00GHz

$313.00*

Intel Core i7-965 @ 3.20GHz

$1,508.95

Intel Core i7-960 @ 3.20GHz

$459.95

Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 @ 1.90GHz

$288.25

Intel Core i5-3330 @ 3.00GHz

$320.00

AMD FX-8140 Eight-Core

AMD A10-7890K

$148.99

AMD Phenom II X6 1100T

$395.99*

Intel Core i5-2400 @ 3.10GHz

$171.40

Intel Core i5-6500T @ 2.50GHz

Intel Xeon W5580 @ 3.20GHz

$1,659.99*

AMD PRO A10-8850B

Intel Core i5-3570T @ 2.30GHz

Intel Xeon E5-1603 v3 @ 2.80GHz

Intel Core i5-3335S @ 2.70GHz

Intel Core i3-6300 @ 3.80GHz

$149. 99

Intel Xeon W3550 @ 3.07GHz

$235.00*

AMD FX-6120 Six-Core

Intel Core i5-6300HQ @ 2.30GHz

Intel Core i5-2380P @ 3.10GHz

$211.91*

Intel Core i5-3340S @ 2.80GHz

$96.99*

2016-09-12 13:41

PassMark Intel vs AMD CPU Benchmarks — High End

9 z 12

https://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html

Intel Xeon E5-1607 @ 3.00GHz

Intel Xeon X5570 @ 2.93GHz

$38.88

Intel Xeon L5638 @ 2.00GHz

$593.00*

Intel Core i5-2320 @ 3.00GHz

$295.45

AMD Phenom II X6 1090T

$472.13

Intel Core i7-880 @ 3.07GHz

$583.00*

Intel Core i5-6500TE @ 2.30GHz

Intel Core i7-2675QM @ 2.20GHz

AMD Opteron 3365

AMD Athlon X4 880K

$93.45

Intel Core i7-950 @ 3.07GHz

$408.95

AMD PRO A10-8750B

Intel Core i5-3330S @ 2.70GHz

$98.98

Intel Core i7-2630QM @ 2.00GHz

$184.95*

AMD A10-7870K

$129. 99

Intel Core i3-4370 @ 3.80GHz

$146.99

AMD PRO A8-8650B

AMD Athlon X4 860K

$71.99

AMD A10-7850K APU

$175.15

AMD Athlon X4 845

$66.00

AMD A10 PRO-7850B APU

Intel Core i7-875K @ 2.93GHz

Number of Cores: 4 (2 logical per)

$344.55

Intel Xeon W3540 @ 2.93GHz

$698.95*

Intel Core i7-2635QM @ 2.00GHz

Intel Core i7-6567U @ 3.30GHz

Intel Xeon E5-1603 @ 2.80GHz

$164.99*

Intel Core i5-4590T @ 2.00GHz

Intel Core i3-4360 @ 3.70GHz

$155.69

Intel Core i5-2310 @ 2.90GHz

$169.99*

Intel Core i7-870 @ 2.93GHz

$236.21

Intel Core i7-940 @ 2.93GHz

$409.95*

Intel Xeon E5640 @ 2.67GHz

$88.81

Intel Xeon X5560 @ 2.80GHz

$37.88

AMD A10 PRO-7800B APU

AMD Phenom II X6 1075T

$259.99*

Intel Xeon X5550 @ 2.67GHz

$74.48

Intel Core i7-2710QE @ 2. 10GHz

AMD FX-6100 Six-Core

$89.99*

AMD A8-8650

Intel Xeon W3530 @ 2.80GHz

$293.95*

AMD Opteron 4332 HE

Intel Core i5-6400T @ 2.20GHz

$159.00

Intel Core i3-6100 @ 3.70GHz

$124.73

Intel Core i3-4350 @ 3.60GHz

$163.99

AMD FX-4330

Intel Core i5-2300 @ 2.80GHz

$189.99

Intel Core i7-2715QE @ 2.10GHz

AMD Opteron 3280

$273.18*

AMD FX-4350 Quad-Core

$86.00

Intel Core i3-4340 @ 3.60GHz

$170.99*

2016-09-12 13:41

PassMark Intel vs AMD CPU Benchmarks — High End

10 z 12

https://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html

Intel Core i7-930 @ 2.80GHz

$400.45

Intel Core i5-2500S @ 2.70GHz

$152.00*

AMD A10-7700K APU

$94.99

Intel Xeon X3470 @ 2.93GHz

$509.95*

AMD A8-7600 APU

$79.99

AMD Phenom II X6 1065T

Intel Core i3-6098P @ 3.60GHz

$128. 22*

Intel Xeon E5630 @ 2.53GHz

$73.80

AMD Athlon X4 870K

$86.99

Intel Xeon X3460 @ 2.80GHz

$75.50*

AMD A10-7800 APU

$104.99*

Intel Core i3-4170 @ 3.70GHz

$119.99

Intel Core i3-6300T @ 3.30GHz

$158.06

AMD Athlon X4 840

Intel Core i3-4570T @ 2.90GHz

Intel Core i7-860 @ 2.80GHz

$347.30

Intel Xeon W3520 @ 2.67GHz

$408.95*

Intel Core i3-4330 @ 3.50GHz

$149.99

AMD Phenom II X6 1055T

$185.00*

Intel Core i7-870S @ 2.67GHz

Intel Core i7-4610M @ 3.00GHz

Intel Core i3-4160 @ 3.60GHz

Number of Cores: 4 (2 logical per)

$119.99

Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 @ 2.50GHz

$311.47

Intel Xeon X3450 @ 2.67GHz

$172.54*

Intel Core i7-920 @ 2.67GHz

$235.67

AMD FX-4320

AMD A10-6800B APU

AMD A8-7650K

$89.99

Intel Xeon X5492 @ 3.40GHz

$1,391. 29*

AMD A10-7860K

$109.99

Intel Core i5-4340M @ 2.90GHz

AMD A8-7670K

$101.99

AMD A8 PRO-7600B APU

Intel Core i5-2405S @ 2.50GHz

$471.59*

AMD A10-8750

Intel Core i7-5557U @ 3.10GHz

$895.00

AMD A10-6800K APU

$114.00

AMD FX-770K Quad-Core

Intel Xeon E5-2603 v3 @ 1.60GHz

$189.00

Intel Xeon E5620 @ 2.40GHz

$20.90

AMD Phenom II X6 1045T

$175.00*

Intel Core i3-4150 @ 3.50GHz

$126.16

Intel Xeon E5540 @ 2.53GHz

$39.40*

Intel Core i5-2400S @ 2.50GHz

$339.95

Intel Core i5-4460T @ 1.90GHz

Intel Core i7-6650U @ 2.20GHz

AMD FX-4170 Quad-Core

$143.61*

Intel Core i5-6267U @ 2.90GHz

Intel Core i7-4600M @ 2.90GHz

Intel Core i7-860S @ 2.53GHz

$460.00

2016-09-12 13:41

PassMark Intel vs AMD CPU Benchmarks — High End

11 z 12

https://www. cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html

Intel Xeon X5470 @ 3.33GHz

$276.00*

Intel Core i3-4130 @ 3.40GHz

$189.95

Intel Core i5-4570T @ 2.90GHz

$210.99

AMD Phenom II X6 1035T

$189.00*

Intel Core i3-6100T @ 3.20GHz

$125.87

AMD Opteron 6128

$206.67

AMD Embedded R-Series RX-421BD

Intel Core i7-6600U @ 2.60GHz

Intel Xeon X5667 @ 3.07GHz

$160.00*

Intel Xeon X5482 @ 3.20GHz

$94.99

Intel Xeon X3380 @ 3.16GHz

Intel Core i7-6560U @ 2.20GHz

Intel Core i5-4330M @ 2.80GHz

$274.99*

Intel Core i7-4578U @ 3.00GHz

Intel Xeon E5-2407 v2 @ 2.40GHz

$468.08

Intel Core2 Extreme X9770 @ 3.20GHz

$1,400.00*

AMD FirePro A320 APU

Intel Core2 Extreme X9775 @ 3.20GHz

$995.00*

AMD A10-6790K APU

$146.80

AMD A10-5800K APU

$90.99

Intel Core i5-5287U @ 2.90GHz

Intel Core i3-4360T @ 3. 20GHz AMD FX-4300 Quad-Core

Number of Cores: 4 (2 logical per)

NA $79.99

AMD A10-5800B APU

Intel Xeon E5530 @ 2.40GHz

$81.15*

Intel Core i7-3540M @ 3.00GHz

$348.54*

Intel Xeon E5-2609 @ 2.40GHz

$39.99

AMD A10-6700 APU

$126.99

Intel Core i5-2500T @ 2.30GHz

Intel Core2 Extreme X9750 @ 3.16GHz

AMD FX-4150 Quad-Core

AMD A8-6600K APU

$155.93

AMD Phenom II X4 980

$136.64*

AMD Phenom II X4 975

$129.99*

AMD A10-9630P

Intel Core i5-4310M @ 2.70GHz

AMD Athlon X4 760K Quad Core

$113.24*

AMD A8-6500B APU

Intel Core i5-4210H @ 2.90GHz

Intel Core i7-3520M @ 2.90GHz

Intel Xeon X5460 @ 3.16GHz

$74.99

AMD Athlon X4 750 Quad Core

Intel Core i3-4330T @ 3.00GHz

Intel Core i5-3470T @ 2.90GHz

$232.87*

Intel Xeon X3370 @ 3. 00GHz

$365.50*

AMD RX-427BB

Intel Core i3-4170T @ 3.20GHz

Intel Xeon E5520 @ 2.27GHz

$19.50

Intel Xeon X3440 @ 2.53GHz

$508.95*

AMD FX-670K Quad-Core

2016-09-12 13:41

PassMark Intel vs AMD CPU Benchmarks — High End

12 z 12

https://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html

AMD Phenom II X4 B70

AMD Phenom II X4 970

$124.99*

Intel Xeon L5630 @ 2.13GHz

$451.05*

Intel Core i5-4288U @ 2.60GHz

Intel Core i3-3250 @ 3.50GHz

$337.56

Intel Core i5-4200H @ 2.80GHz

AMD A8-6500 APU

$324.87*

Intel Core i5-3360M @ 2.80GHz

$239.36*

AMD FX-9800P

Intel Core i5-4300M @ 2.60GHz

Intel Xeon L5520 @ 2.27GHz

$18.90*

Intel Core i3-4160T @ 3.10GHz

AMD PRO A12-8800B

Intel Core i5-4308U @ 2.80GHz

Intel Core i5-5257U @ 2.70GHz

Intel Core i3-3225 @ 3. 30GHz

$319.59*

Intel Core i3-2140 @ 3.50GHz

Intel Core i7-6500U @ 2.50GHz

AMD A8-5600K APU

$179.99

Intel Core i5-3380M @ 2.90GHz

* — Last seen price from our affiliates.

Number of Samples: 119 Number of Cores: 4 (2 logical per)

[Home] — [Common CPUs] — [Overclocked CPUs] — [Searchable CPU List] — [Graph Notes] [High-End CPUs] — [High Mid-Range CPUs] — [Low Mid-Range CPUs] — [Low-End CPUs] [CPU Popularity 90 days] — [Multi CPU Systems] — [Laptop CPUs] — [CPU Mega Page — Detailed CPU List] [Single Thread CPU Performance] — [CPU Mark by Socket Type] — [Manufacturer Market Share]

2016-09-12 13:41

AMD FX-6100 vs Intel Xeon E5-2630: What is the difference?

Smartphone-graphic wire headphones

36 ballla

AMD FX-6100

35 BALLLA

Intel Xeon E5-2630

64 AMD FX-6100

Intel XEON ENTEL XEON ENTEL XEON ENTL Is FX-6100 better than Intel Xeon E5-2630?

43. 48% higher CPU speed?
6 x 3.3GHz vs 6 x 2.3GHz
533MHz higher RAM speed?
1866MHz vs 1333MHz
4.5MB more L2 cache?
6MB vs 1.5MB
1.1GHz higher turbo clock speed?
3.9GHz vs 2.8GHz
Has unlocked multiplier?
0.75MB/core more L2 cache per core?
1MB/core vs 0.25MB/core
Has F16C?
Has FMA4?

Why is Intel Xeon E5-2630 better than AMD FX-6100?

6 more CPU threads?
12 vs 6
1.6x higher PassMark score?
8634 vs 5406
7MB more L3 cache?
15MB vs 8MB
1 newer PCI Express (PCIe) version?
3 vs 2
96KB more L1 cache?
384KB vs 288KB
21.6GB/s more memory bandwidth?
42.6GB/s vs 21GB/s
17. 05% higher PassMark score (single)?
1407 vs 1202
2 more memory channels?
4 vs 2

Which comparisons are the most popular?

AMD FX-6100

Intel Core i5-4440

Intel Xeon E5-2630

Intel Xeon E5-2603

AMD FX-6100

AMD FX-6300

Intel Xeon E5-2630

Intel Xeon E5-2650

AMD FX-6100

Intel Core I5-11600K Intel Xeon E5-2630

Intel Xeon E5-4620

AMD FX-6100

AMD FX-4300

Intel Xeon E5-26302 VS

Intel W-2155 9000 9000 9000 9 FX-6100

Intel Core i5-4570

Intel Xeon E5-2630

Intel Xeon E5-2660

AMD FX-6100

Intel Core i5-3470

Intel Xeon E5-2630 9000

INTEL XEON ENT V5

AMD FX-6100

Intel Core i3-3220

Intel Xeon E5-2630

Intel Xeon E5-1650

AMD FX-6100

9000 VS

Intel Core INTEL INTEL INTEL

Intel Xeon E5-2630

Intel Xeon E5-2630L

AMD FX-6100

Intel Core i3-8300

Intel Xeon E5-2630

Intel Xeon E5-2620

AMD FX-6100

AMD RYZEN 3 2200G

Intel Xeon E5-2630

Intel Xeon E5-2640

Complexes of users

General0002 AMD FX-6100

7. 0 /10

1 Reviews of users

Intel Xeon E5-2630

0 Reviews of Users

Intel Xeon E5-2630

0.0 /10

0 Reviews of Users 9000 9000 9000 Functions

The price ratio

8.0 /10

1 Votes

reviews is not

Games

7.0 /10

1 Votes

Reviews until

performance

6.0 /10

1 Votes

Reviews not yet

Reliability

8.0 /10 9000

1 Votes

Reviews yet not

7.0 /10

1 votes

No reviews yet

Performance

1.cpu speed

6 x 3.3GHz

6 x 2.3GHz

CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second the processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.

2nd processor thread

More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.

3.speed turbo clock

3.9GHz

2.8GHz

When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

4. Unlocked

✔AMD FX-6100

✖Intel Xeon E5-2630

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and can be easily overclocked for better performance in games and other applications.

5.L2 cache

More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

6.L3 cache

More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

7.L1 cache

More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

8.core L2

1MB/core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

9.core L3

1.33MB/core

2.5MB/core

More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad memory to access each processor core.

Memory

1.RAM speed

1866MHz

1333MHz

Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.

2.max memory bandwidth

21GB/s

42.6GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3.DDR version

DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.

4. Memory channels

More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.

5.max memory

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6100)

Maximum amount of memory (RAM).

6.baud rate bus

5.4GT/s

7.2GT/s

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7.Supports memory troubleshooting code

✖AMD FX-6100

✔Intel Xeon E5-2630

Memory error recovery code can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6100)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2630)

A newer version of eMMC — Embedded Flash Memory Card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.

9.bus frequency

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6100)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2630)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device

Geotagging

1. PassMark result

This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.

2. PassMark result (single)

This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6100)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2630)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

4. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6100)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2630)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6100)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2630)

Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6100)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2630)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7. Blender test result (bmw27)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6100)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2630)

Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

8.Blender result (classroom)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6100)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2630)

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

9.performance per watt

This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.

Functions

1.uses multithreading

✖AMD FX-6100

✔Intel Xeon E5-2630

processor cores into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.

2. Has AES

✔AMD FX-6100

✔Intel Xeon E5-2630

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3. Has AVX

✔AMD FX-6100

✔Intel Xeon E5-2630

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.

4.Version SSE

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5. Has F16C

✔AMD FX-6100

✖Intel Xeon E5-2630

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

6.bits transmitted at the same time

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6100)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2630)

NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.

7. Has MMX

✔AMD FX-6100

✔Intel Xeon E5-2630

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

8. Has TrustZone

✖AMD FX-6100

✖Intel Xeon E5-2630

The technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and video streaming using Digital Rights Management (DRM) technology ).

9.interface width

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6100)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2630)

The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which CPUs are better?

Comparison of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 and AMD FX-6100

Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 and AMD FX-6100 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and Reliability, Technology, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation ( Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score.

Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2

versus

AMD FX-6100

Benefits

Reasons to choose Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2

Newer processor, release dates difference 1 year(s) 11 month(s) 9023 more cores

run more applications simultaneously: 8 vs 6

10 more threads: 16 vs 6
About 7% more max core temperature: 75°C vs 70°C
A newer manufacturing process for the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 22 nm vs 32 nm SOI
L1 cache is about 78% larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
L3 cache in 2. 5 times more means more data can be stored in it for quick access
Performance in PassMark — Single thread mark benchmark is about 29% higher: 1706 vs 1321
Performance in PassMark — CPU mark benchmark is 4.7 times (and ) more: 17470 vs 3692
About 33% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 618 vs 466
2.9x better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 4894 vs 1702
Performance in CompuBench 1 Desktop.5 Desktop. — Face Detection (mPixels/s) about 26% more: 7.754 vs 6.171
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop performance — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4.2 times more: 67.377 vs 15.905
Benchmark performance CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.7 times bigger: 0.893 vs 0.327
6.1x more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 3.684 vs 0.606
2x performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) benchmark( a) more: 9.875 vs 4.915

configuration

Release date	September 2013 vs October 2011
Number of cores	8 vs 6
Number of threads	16 vs 6
Maximum core temperature	75°C vs 70°C
Process	22 nm vs 32 nm SOI
Level 1 cache	64 KB (per core) vs 288 KB
Level 3 cache	20480 KB (shared) vs 8 MB
Maximum number of processors in	2 vs 1
PassMark — Single thread mark	1706 vs 1321
PassMark — CPU mark	17470 vs 3692
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	618 vs 466
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	4894 vs 1702
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	7.754 vs 6.171
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	67.377 vs 15.905
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.893 vs 0.327
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	3.684 vs 0.606
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	9.875 vs 4.915

Reasons to choose AMD FX-6100

Unlocked CPU, unlocked multiplier allows easy overclocking
About 15% more clock speed: 3.9 GHz vs 3.40 GHz
L2 cache is 3 times larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access

Unlocked	Unlocked / Locked
Maximum frequency	3. 9GHz vs 3.40GHz
Level 2 cache	6 MB vs 256 KB (per core)

Benchmark comparison

CPU 1: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
CPU 2: AMD FX-6100

PassMark — Single thread mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

PassMark — CPU mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

Geekbench 4 — Single Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

CompuBench 1.

5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

67.377

15.905

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

CompuBench 1.

5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

Name	Intel Xeon E5-2650v2	AMD FX-6100
PassMark — Single thread mark	1706	1321
PassMark — CPU mark	17470	3692
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	618	466
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	4894	1702
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	7.754	6.171
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	67.377	15.905
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.893	0.327
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	3.684	0.606
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	9.875	4.915
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score		0

Feature comparison

configuration

	Intel Xeon E5-2650v2	AMD FX-6100
Architecture name	Ivy Bridge EP	Zambezi
Issue date	September 2013	October 2011
Price at first issue date	$650
Place in the rating	1356	2216
Price now	$260. 56	$299
Processor Number	E5-2650V2
Series	Intel® Xeon® Processor E5 v2 Family	AMD FX 6-Core Black Edition Processors
Status	Launched
Price/performance ratio (0-100)	14.78	5.30
Applicability	Server	Desktop
Family		AMD FX-Series Processors
OPN PIB		FD6100WMGUSBX
OPN Tray		FD6100WMW6KGU
Support 64 bit
Base frequency	2. 60 GHz	3.3 GHz
Bus Speed	8 GT/s QPI
Crystal area	160 mm	315 mm
Level 1 cache	64 KB (per core)	288KB
Level 2 cache	256 KB (per core)	6MB
Level 3 cache	20480 KB (shared)	8MB
Process	22nm	32nm SOI
Maximum core temperature	75°C	70°C
Maximum frequency	3. 40 GHz	3.9 GHz
Number of cores	8	6
Number of QPI Links	2
Number of threads	16	6
Number of transistors	1400 million	1200 million
Permissible core voltage	0.65–1.30V
Unlocked
ECC support
Maximum number of memory channels	4
Maximum memory bandwidth	59. 7 GB/s
Maximum memory size	768GB
Supported memory types	DDR3 800/1066/1333/1600/1866	DDR3
Supported memory frequency		1866MHz
Low Halogen Options Available
Maximum number of processors in	2	1
Package Size	52.5mm x 51mm
Supported sockets	FCLGA2011	AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	95 Watt
Number of PCI Express lanes	40
PCI Express revision	3. 0
PCIe configurations	x4, x8, x16
Scalability	2S Only
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Identity Protection Technology
Intel® OS Guard
Intel® Secure Key Technology
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT)
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology
Idle States
Extended instructions	Intel® AVX
Intel 64
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Intel® Flex Memory Access
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology
Intel® TSX-NI
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
Physical Address Extensions (PAE)	46-bit
Thermal Monitoring
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA)
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)

AMD FX-8320 vs.

Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3

AMD FX-8320

AMD FX-8320 runs with 8 and 8 CPU threads It runs at 4.00 GHz base 3.75 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 125 W .CPU plugs into socket CPU AM3+ This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR3-1866 RAM, and supports PCIe Gen . Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, the Vishera (Bulldozer) Architecture is advanced beyond 32 nm and supports AMD-V . The product was launched Q4/2012

Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3

Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 runs with 8 and 8 CPU threads It runs at 3.20 GHz base 2.80 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 85 W .Processor connects to LGA CPU socket 2011-3 This version includes 20.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 4 to support DDR4-2133 RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 40 . Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, Haswell E Architecture is advanced beyond 22 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q3/2014

AMD FX-8320

Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3

Frequency 2.

40 GHz 8 Cores 8 4.00 GHz Turbo (1 core) 3.20 GHz 3.75GHz Turbo (all cores) 2.80 GHz No. Hyper Threading Yes Yes Overclocking No. normal Basic architecture normal no iGPU GPU no iGPU no turbo GPU (Turbo) No turbo 32nm Technology 22nm no turbo GPU (Turbo) No turbo DirectX Version Max. displays DDR3-1866 memory size DDR4-2133 2 Memory channels 4 Maximum memory Yes ECC Yes — L2 Cache — 8.

00MB L3 Cache 20.00MB PCIe version 3.0 PCIe lanes 40 32nm Technology 22nm AM3+ Connector LGA 2011-3 125 W TDP 85W AMD-V Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Q4/2012 Release date Q3/2014

Show more details

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the processors listed below have been tested with CPU-Comparison. However, most of the processors were not tested and the results were evaluated by the secret patented CPU-Comparison formula. As such, they do not accurately reflect the actual values of Passmark CPU ratings and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Energy usage estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU usage (0-100%)

Cost of electricity, USD/kWh

Energy usage estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU usage (0-100%)

Cost of electricity, USD/kWh

Comments

i3 6100 vs i7 2600

Contents

Why is Intel Core i7-2600K better than Intel Core i3-6100?
What are the most popular comparisons?
General information
Performance
Memory
Features
Benefits
Reasons to choose Intel Core i3-6100
Reasons to choose Intel Core i7-2600K
Benchmark comparison
Add CPUs to start comparisons

Why is Intel Core i3-6100 better than Intel Core i7-2600K?

800MHz higher ram speed

Why is Intel Core i7-2600K better than Intel Core i3-6100?

1. 84x higher CPU clock speed
4 x 3.4GHz vs 2 x 3.7GHz
4 more CPU threads

What are the most popular comparisons?

Intel Core i3-6100

Intel Pentium Silver N5000

Intel Core i7-2600K

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i3-6100 9000 9000 9000 9000.200 Core I5-3470 9000. Intel Core i7-3770K

Intel Core i3-6100

Intel Core i5-2500K

Intel Core i7-2600K

Intel Core i7-2600

Intel Core i3-6100

AMD Ryzen 3200g 9000

AMD Ryzen 3200g

AMD0002 Intel Core i7-2600K

Intel Xeon E3-1270

Intel Core i3-6100

Intel Pentium G4560

Intel Core i7-2600K

Intel Core i5-9400F

Intel Core i3-6100

Intel Core i7-2600K

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

Intel Core i3-6100

AMD Ryzen 5 1600x

Intel Core i7-2600K

Intel Core i7-2700K

Intel Core i3-6100

Intel Core i7-2600K

Intel Core i5-7400

Intel Core i3-6100

Intel Core i7-2600K

Intel Xeon E5-26303

Intel Core i3-6100

Intel Core i5-3570

Intel Core

2600

Intel Core i5-2500K

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

The heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that the cooling system will have to dissipate. A lower TDP also usually means less power consumption.

Intel Atom E3805

A smaller size indicates a newer chip creation process.

AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

32-bit operating system can support up to 4 GB of RAM. 64-bit allows more than 4 GB, which improves performance. It also allows you to run 64-bit applications.

Intel Core i3-6100

Intel Core i7-2600K

DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.

AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE

When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

Intel Core i7-4930MX

Performance

Intel Xeon Platinum 9282

More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

Intel Xeon Phi 7290F

More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

AMD Ryzen 9 3900X

More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.

Intel Xeon Phi 7290F

More L1 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

Intel Xeon Phi 7290F

More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

Intel Core i5-4200Y

Memory

Can support faster memory that speeds up system performance.

AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.

Intel Atom x5-Z8350

Maximum amount of memory (RAM).

Intel Xeon E7-8830

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.

Intel Xeon Gold 5115

Memory error recovery code can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

Intel Core i3-6100

Intel Core i7-2600K

Features

Dynamic frequency scaling is a technology that allows the processor to save power and reduce noise when it is under light load.

Intel Core i3-6100

Intel Core i7-2600K

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

Intel Core i3-6100

Intel Core i7-2600K

It’s easier to get better quality using virtualization if it’s hardware supported.

Intel Core i3-6100

Intel Core i7-2600K

Many Intel processors use Hyperthreading technology, which means that each processor core can run on two threads at the same time, rather than most processors that run on a single thread for each core. This means you will get better quality in some applications.

Intel Core i3-6100

Intel Core i7-2600K

Advanced transistor technology developed by Intel for low power consumption and high speed.

Intel Core i3-6100

Intel Core i7-2600K

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as image editing or volume control. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

Comparative analysis of Intel Core i3-6100 and Intel Core i7-2600K processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphical interfaces, Image quality in graphics, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and reliability, Technology, Virtualization. Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T- Rex (Fps).

Benefits

Reasons to choose Intel Core i3-6100

Newer processor, release date difference 4 year(s) 7 month(s)
A newer manufacturing process for the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 14 nm vs 32 nm
Maximum memory size is 2 times larger: 64 GB vs 32 GB
Approximately 86% less power consumption: 51 Watt vs 95 Watt
Performance in PassMark — Single thread mark about 8% higher: 2105 vs 1941
Geekbench 4 — Single Core about 10% better performance: 4247 vs 3865

AMD FX-8320		Intel Xeon E5-2630v3
125 W	Max TDP	85W
NA	Power consumption per day (kWh)	NA
NA	Operating cost per day	NA
NA	Power consumption per year (kWh)	NA
NA	Cost per year	NA

Features
Issue date	September 2015 vs 3 January 2011
Process	14 nm vs 32 nm
Maximum memory size	64 GB vs 32 GB
Power consumption (TDP)	51 Watt vs 95 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark — Single thread mark	2105 vs 1941
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	4247 vs 3865

Reasons to choose Intel Core i7-2600K

Processor unlocked, unlocked multiplier makes it easy to overclock
2 more cores, the ability to run more applications simultaneously: 4 vs 2
4 more threads: 8 vs 4
Approximately 3% higher clock speed: 3. 80 GHz vs 3.7 GHz
Approximately 12% higher max core temperature: 72.6°C vs 65°C
L1 cache is 2 times larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
L2 cache is 2 times larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
L3 cache is 2 times larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
Performance in PassMark benchmark — CPU mark about 54% higher: 8434 vs 5483
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core performance about 57% better: 12630 vs 8028
Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) about 64% better: 4.592 vs 2.795
Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) about 58% better: 77.745 vs 49.124
Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) about 92% better: 0.602 vs 0.314
Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — V >

Features
Unlocked	Unlocked / Locked
Number of cores	4 vs 2
Number of threads	8 vs 4
Maximum frequency	3. 80 GHz vs 3.7 GHz
Maximum core temperature	72.6°C vs 65°C
Level 1 cache	64 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core)
Level 2 cache	1024 KB vs 256 KB (per core)
Level 3 cache	8192 KB vs 4096 KB (shared)
Benchmarks
PassMark — CPU mark	8434 vs 5483
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	12630 vs 8028
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	4.592 vs 2.795
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	77.745 vs 49.124
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.602 vs 0.314
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	2.14 vs 1.401
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	5. 018 vs 3.445

benchmark comparison The values for the CPU are determined from thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and is updated daily.

Add CPUs to start comparisons

Compare the performance of up to 3 different CPUs

buying a processor, motherboard and memory in China / Workshop

GeForce GTX 1070. Of course, a faster version of the graphics accelerator could be used for processor-dependency tests, but in reality, a user who has the funds to buy adapters of the GeForce GTX 1080 and GeForce GTX 1080 Ti level is unlikely to deny himself the pleasure of buying modern and more productive platform.

Test bench configuration
CPU	Intel Xeon E5-2670 @2.6GHz
Motherboard	G218A-V1.1a
RAM	Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YK0 DDR3-1600, 2 × 8 GB
ROM	Samsung 850 Pro
Video card	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8 GB
Power supply	Corsair AX1500i, 1500W
CPU cooling system	Noctua NH-D9DX
Housing	Lian Li PC-T60A
Monitor	NEC EA244UHD
Operating system	Windows 10 Pro x64
Graphics Software
NVIDIA	GeForce Game Ready Driver 378. 78
Additional software
Remove drivers	Display Driver Uninstaller 17.0.6.1
FPS measurement	Fraps 3.5.99
FPS measurement	Action! 2.3.0
Overclocking and Monitoring	GPU-Z 1.18.0
	SetFSB 2.3.178.134
	MSI Afterburner 4.3.0
Accessories
Thermal Imager	Fluke Ti400
Sound level meter	Mastech MS6708
Wattmeter	watts up? PRO

Compare Xeon E5-2670 in terms of performance with Core i3-6100, Core i5-7400 and Core i7-6400T processors. The first two chips act as an alternative in terms of price. We can easily buy these CPUs at any computer store. And the Core i7-6400T is another “hello from China”. We have studied the capabilities of this processor in detail in this article. The author has an engineering version marked QHQG (L501C679) at a voltage of 1.375 V, it accelerates to a stable 4008 MHz (the BCLK frequency was increased from the nominal 100 to 167 MHz. To achieve this result, we had to use a very efficient cooling — the Noctua NH-D15 cooler. and Core i7-7700.Taking into account the fact that overclocking the Core i7-6400T via the bus does not lead to a decrease in performance in applications using AVX instructions, in my opinion, a fairly clear picture is formed.0003

The ASUS Z170 PRO GAMING motherboard and Kingston HyperX Fury HX421C14FB2K2/16 (DDR4-2133, 14-14-14-35) dual-channel memory kit were used with Skylake and Kaby Lake processors.

Games
		API	Graphic quality	FSAA
		API	Graphic quality	1920 × 1080 / 2560 × 1440
1	Crysis 3 mission Safeties off	DirectX 11	Max. quality	4 x MSAA
2	The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Novigrad		Max. quality, NVIDIA HairWorks incl.	AA
3	GTA V, built-in benchmark		Max. quality	4 × MSAA + FXAA
4	Fallout 4 Commonwealth		Max. quality, high resolution textures, bullet fragments off.	TAA
5	Watch_Dogs 2		Ultra	SMAA
6	Far Cry 4		Max. quality	4 x MSAA
7	Rise of the Tomb Raider, Soviet Base	DirectX 12	Max. quality	SMAA
8	HITMAN, built-in benchmark		Max. quality	SMAA
9	Total War: WARHAMMER, built-in benchmark		Max. quality	4 x MSAA
10	Battlefield 1 Cape Helles		Ultra	TAA
11	Sid Meier’s Civilization VI, built-in benchmark		Ultra	4 x MSAA

Game graphics settings are shown in the table, testing was carried out in Full HD and WQHD resolutions, since these formats are the most suitable for a GeForce GTX 1070 level video card. Computational performance was measured using the following software:

WinRAR 5.40. Archiving a folder of 11 GB with various data in RAR5 format and with the maximum degree of compression.
Blender 2.76. Determining the speed of the final rendering in one of the popular free packages for creating three-dimensional graphics. The duration of building the final model from Blender Cycles Benchmark rev4 is measured.
x265 HD Benchmark. Testing the speed of video transcoding to the promising H.265/HEVC format.
CINEBENCH R15. Measuring the performance of photorealistic 3D rendering in the CINEMA 4D animation package.
Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.9. Performance testing when exporting 200 RAW photos at 5184 x 3456 pixels to JPEG at 1620 x 1080 at maximum quality.
Adobe After Effects CC 2017. Project rendered in 1920 × 1080 @60 FPS.
SONY Vegas Movie Studio Platinum v13. Project rendering in 1920 × 1080 @30 FPS with various effects applied.

⇡#Performance in applications and benchmarks

We have decided on the competitors for the Xeon E5-2670. But first, let’s see how the server processor is positioned relative to modern and expensive Kaby Lake and Broadwell-E chips — just for fun.

Performance of Intel Xeon E5-2670 in CINEBENCH R15

Well, Xeon E5-2670 is clearly not lost against more modern models. In CINEBENCH R15, it is located exactly between the Core i7-7700K and Core i7-6800K. Eight cores and 16 threads do the trick.

The Xeon E5-2670 is great for content creation. Especially taking into account the fact that dual-core Pentium and Core i3 are its competitors in terms of price. When rendering 3D graphics, encoding video, and archiving data, the server CPU’s 16 threads and 20 MB of L3 cache make themselves felt. Although in After Effects, the difference in performance between Sandy Bridge and Skylake architectures also affects. This time not in favor of the Xeon E5-2670.

Memory overclocking has a positive effect on performance in all cases. Even taking into account the fact that when setting the DDR3-1866 mode, delays increase.

Xeon E5-2670 is a worthy option for those who want to build the most budget PC for work. But at the same time, it should be noted that the Core i7-6400T overclocked to 4 GHz in most cases is ahead of the 8-core server «stone». Only to achieve such a subordination between processors, we need a sample that, firstly, will overclock itself to at least 3.8-4 GHz, and, secondly, a more expensive motherboard based on the Z170 Express chipset.

Intel Xeon E5-2670 performance in 3DMark Time Spy

Xeon E5-2670 overclocking and memory increased 3DMark Time Spy scores by 3%.

⇡#Performance in games

The fact that modern games are optimized for multi-core CPUs is no secret to anyone. At the same time, another review of the Ryzen 7 1800X processor shows a different picture: the Core i7-7700K is currently considered the best solution for entertainment — a quad-core with support for Hyper-threading technology. It is inferior not only to the flagship AMD chips, but also to the more expensive models Core i7-6800K, Core i7-6900K and Core i7-6950X. So the presence of 12 and 16 threads is often superfluous in games. While superfluous.

The table below shows not only the average FPS, but also the minimum. This is an important point, as four threads are not enough for some games. The video card does not start to work at full capacity, but the most annoying thing is FPS drawdowns, which can be observed visually and spoil the whole impression. Xeon E5-2670, as we have already found out, competes with junior Intel solutions — Pentium processors, which received Hyper-threading support in the Kaby Lake generation, and Core i3. In games, the Core i3-6100, Pentium G4560, and Pentium G4600 models show similar results, because in such applications, with a few exceptions, the vector instruction set is not used, and the clock speeds of these chips do not differ much.

Games, FPS
	1920 × 1080				2560 × 1440
	Intel Xeon E5-2670 [DDR3-1937]		Intel Core i3-6100 [DDR4-2133]		Intel Xeon E5-2670 [DDR3-1937]		Intel Core i3-6100 [DDR4-2133]
	min	avg	min	avg	min	avg	min	avg
Crysis 3	56	71	56	71	34	44	35	44
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	67	78	64	73	50	56	45	56
GTAV	45	63	42	57	39	55	39	53
Fallout 4	70	102	63	101	47	70	47	70
Watch_Dogs 2	38	55	30	43	31	41	29	39
Far Cry 4	37	58	56	77	36	51	45	53
Rise of the Tomb Raider	56	67	45	63	40	47	40	47
HITMAN	52	100	42	73	60	83	43	71
Total War: WARHAMMER	47	61	41	51	38	42	27	42
Battlefield 1	64	77	59	78	42	53	42	56
Sid Meier’s Civilization VI	26	54	44	55	30	54	45	54

As a result, the stand with the eight-core Xeon E5-2670 together with the GeForce GTX 1070 performs better than the system with the Core i3-6100. The average FPS is higher in a number of games: The Witcher 3, GTA V, Watch_Dogs 2, Rise of the Tomb Raider, HITMAN and Total War: WARHAMMER. In addition, there are applications (Fallout 4 and Battlefield 1) in which the Xeon E5-2670 and Core i3-6100 show a similar average frame rate, but the dual-core Skylake chip has a lower minimum FPS.

At WQHD resolution, CPU dependence in games is less observed, since the video card works at full capacity with the graphics quality settings we have set. The Core i3-6100 again turns out to be an outsider. We are once again convinced that a GeForce GTX 1070-level video card should be paired with at least a Core i5, since four cores are better than four threads.

In some games, overclocking the Xeon E5-2670 and memory gives a noticeable increase in frames per second: in GTA V — 7%; in HITMAN — 8%; in the sixth «Civilization» — 20%. And if there is no need for «troubles» with SetFSB for the sake of an additional 100 MHz, then «flashing» the BIOS with subsequent overclocking of the memory to 1866 MHz is very, very desirable.

There are games in which the Skylake architecture is noticeably superior to Sandy Bridge. For example, in Far Cry 4 in Full HD resolution, the Xeon E5-2670 is inferior to the Core i3-6100 by no less than 33%. At the same time, we know that the DUNIA game engine is optimized for eight threads. A similar situation is observed in Sid Meier’s Civilization VI. Only here the clock frequency of the processor comes first. Therefore, the Core i3-6100 is ahead of the Core i5-7400 as well.

And there are games in which a system based on the Xeon E5-2670 is noticeably ahead of the stand with the Core i3. In HITMAN, the difference between 8-core and 2-core is 27% in Full HD and 14% in WQHD. Yes, in the case of Core i3 and GeForce GTX 1070, processor dependence manifests itself even at a resolution of 2560 × 1440 pixels. In Watch_Dogs 2 — 28% in Full HD and 5% in WQHD.

If, after all these results, you are seriously thinking about building a gaming PC based on the Xeon E5-2670, then you can safely act. The processor in many games «pulls» the GeForce GTX 1070-level adapter. Sixteen gigabytes of DDR3 RAM is enough for any modern games. And it will be for quite a long time.

Comparison of Xeon E5-2670 (bottom) and Core i5-7400 (top) load in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

Finally, let’s look at one situation. Above is a gluing of two screenshots from The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. As you can see, the Core i5-7400 level processor is 100% loaded in some gaming locations. This leads to the fact that the maximum load on the GeForce GTX 1070 may drop — drawdowns will appear. As a result, the average number of frames for the Core i5-7400 and Xeon E5-2670 turned out to be the same — 78 FPS, but the minimum figure is higher for the 8-core: 67 versus 58 frames per second.

A similar situation, when Core i3 and Core i5 are loaded at 100%, is observed in many modern games: Battlefield 1 (and other games based on the Frostbite Engine), Watch_Dogs 2 and Total War: WARHAMMER.

⇡#Power Consumption

The Xeon E5-2670 TDP level is 115 W — not the highest figure, by the way. The eight-core processors Core i7-5960X and Core i7-6900K, which are produced according to the 22- and 14-nm process technology, respectively, according to the passport have 140 watts of maximum thermal power, and the overclocked Xeon E5-1650 has 130 watts.

Since the Xeon E5-2670 was compared with the more economical 6th and 7th generation Core models, the 8-core chip was completely outperformed by Core i3, Core i5, and Core i7.

⇡#Conclusions

We have bad news. The wide dissemination of information about the capabilities and goodies of the Core i7-6400T engineering sample has seriously raised interest in the Chinese quad-core. As a result, enterprising merchants from China raised prices for this processor. Perhaps the situation will repeat itself with the Xeon E5-2670 reviewed today, as well as other models for the LGA2011 platform.

Other than that, great news! Personally, the purchase of a processor, motherboard and RAM pleased the author. As it turned out, Chinese manufacturers have enough minor flaws, but, fortunately, a lot has already been fixed. Many thanks to the enthusiasts who have collected a large knowledge base on this topic. The Xeon-board-memory bundle competes in price with the dual-core Pentium and Core i3 Skylake and Kaby Lake generations for the LGA1151 platform. Only in the case of LGA2011 you will get a noticeably faster solution. Testing showed that the Xeon E5-2670, together with DDR3-1866 RAM, looks better not only in resource-intensive computing applications, but also in games. The architectural «backwardness» still affects — there is a big difference between the generations of Sandy Bridge and Skylake (Kaby Lake), but the server chip takes its toll due to the large number of cores and threads.

With a limited budget, building a gaming computer based on the Xeon E5-2670, a Chinese motherboard and inexpensive DDR3 RAM seems to be quite an adequate solution. A video card of the GeForce GTX 1070 level harmoniously fits into such a system.

In 2017, 16 GB of RAM is enough for many tasks, including games. And although initially this whole idea with the purchase of a Xeon and an X79 board was dictated by savings, but taking into account the low cost of this product, it would not be out of place to immediately take 32 GB DDR3.

Many are wondering which option to prefer: order one of the Xeons in China or take the Core i7-6400T? Testing showed that the overclocked engineering sample still performs better in games. A more modern architecture and a higher clock frequency (after overclocking) also have an effect. Let’s not forget about the current platform, which has a future. In addition, the Core i7-6400T, together with efficient cooling and a motherboard based on the Z170/Z270 Express chipset, will be noticeably more expensive. Well, it should lead to the sample itself, not all models are overclocked to 4 GHz.

The disadvantages of buying a Xeon and related accessories are obvious. Buying in a Chinese online store is a lottery associated with both the iron itself and its delivery. But risk, as you know, is a noble cause.

RYZEN 5 2600 VS XEON E5-2630 V3

Hi everyone Artem. Today we will compare the performance of RYZEN 5 2600 4.0GHz and XEON E5-2630v3 3.2GHz processors in games and synthetic benchmarks. The memory in both cases is DDR4. RYZEN will operate at 3066MHz memory frequency, and XEON at 1866MHz in four channels. E5-2630 V3 will be with Unlock Turbo Boost, the operating frequency will constantly stay at around 3.2GHz with drawdowns in rendering up to 3.0GHz. But these drawdowns are only at its full load for a long period. This situation does not apply to games.

Game settings will be as high as possible, resolution will be mostly 720p. The results on the charts are pure FPS benchmark run, no capture and no overlay. There may be an error with the video.

I would like to take this opportunity to remind you that we have a catalog of selected products from AliExpress in our AliStore direction, summary tables of XEON processors (INFO menu section), in the future there will be specifications for each. Well, and most importantly, this is a forum where you can discuss all possible topics on computer topics. Do not hesitate to come, you will be very welcome. If there are problems during registration or in general on the technical part of the resource. Contact the online chat in the lower right corner.

Our first project is Shadow of the Tomb Raider . The average frame rate across the entire benchmark is 103/105. As for the third episode with the market, at the beginning Ryzen is a little ahead, and towards the middle they parry. It can be assumed that the performance is very similar.
Grand Theft Auto V Average frame rate 77/74. I remind you that the settings are ultra. MSAAx2 anti-aliasing and advanced settings are fully enabled. According to the latest episode with the machine, the processors are almost equally Ryzen slightly ahead.
HITMAN 2 Average frame rate 86/87. In the demonstrated section of the game, it is clear that Ryzen was almost always ahead. But as a result of running the FPS benchmark from the beginning of this location to the end of the entire section, we got very similar results, even one frame ahead of the 2630 V3. But this is of course conditional, it is clear that 2-3 frames easily fall into error. In general, we can say that although not the entire route of the FPS benchmark is presented in the video, the capture from the E5-2630 V3 still leads to a fairly serious error, which is the minimum FPS, which is the average. This is especially noticeable with versions V3. With the previous generation, there was no such noticeable run-up. The same situation happened with the E5-2628 V3. But I want to note that the result on the diagrams is pure performance without errors.
PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS Average frame rate 174/172. After the latest update, the performance has improved slightly. There are fewer friezes and stators. In some segments, the processors seriously support the video card. Which in our case is not good. Luckily these sections are short.
DOTA 2 Average frame rate 168/156. In this game, the frequency is still a little shaky. We can say that the difference in frequency is high, 800MHz, but do not forget about + two cores and four threads in the E5-2630 V3. And this is a serious claim to victory. In some cases, even 800MHz difference in frequency may not be enough.
Watch Dogs 2 Average frame rate 73/81. This is exactly the case when the frequency difference of 800MHz is not enough. Of all the Zeons I’ve tested, the E5-2630 V3 shows the highest GPU load in CPU-heavy scenes in this project.
RESIDENT EVIL 2 Average frame rate 161/138. There was a serious gap. It is worth noting that these are not 61 and 38, which of course would have affected the comfort of the game. And this is far beyond 100, you can not even feel the difference. Here you need to clarify if your card, of course, can provide this frame rate. In most cases, the card will limit the performance of both one and the other processor. And this applies to all comparison tests of processors.
And the last project for today is Call Of Pripyat Benchmark , the result of which, as always, we will find out a little later.

These are the results. We can conclude that the XEON E5-2630 V3 is a good alternative to the RYZEN 5 2600. Which is also half the price of the R5 at a used price.

Xeon 2630 vs fx 6100: AMD FX-6100 vs Intel Xeon E5-2630: What is the difference?

AMD FX-6100 vs Intel Xeon E5-2630: What is the difference?

Why is AMD FX-6100 better than Intel Xeon E5-2630?

Why is Intel Xeon E5-2630 better than AMD FX-6100?

Which are the most popular comparisons?

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

Features

Performance

Memory

Benchmarks

Features

Price comparison

Which are the best CPUs?

Intel Xeon E5-2630 vs AMD FX-6100

Intel Xeon E5-2630 vs AMD FX-6100

Specifications:

Performances :

Equivalence:

See also:

Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 vs AMD FX-6100

Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 vs AMD FX-6100

Specifications:

Performances :

Equivalence:

See also:

Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 vs Intel Core i3-6100

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3

Reasons to consider the Intel Core i3-6100

Compare benchmarks

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD FX-8150 vs. Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2

AMD FX-8150

Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2

Compare Detail

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Electric Usage Estimate

Electric Usage Estimate

Popular Comparision

Comments

[PDF] CPU Benchmarks Over 600,000 CPUs Benchmarked

AMD FX-6100 vs Intel Xeon E5-2630: What is the difference?

Why is Intel Xeon E5-2630 better than AMD FX-6100?

Which comparisons are the most popular?

Complexes of users

General0002 AMD FX-6100

Performance

Memory

Geotagging

Functions

Price comparison

Which CPUs are better?

Comparison of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 and AMD FX-6100

Benefits

Reasons to choose Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2

Reasons to choose AMD FX-6100

Benchmark comparison

Feature comparison

AMD FX-8320 vs.

AMD FX-8320

Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

benchmark comparison The values for the CPU are determined from thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and is updated daily.