Dual Intel Xeon E5450 vs Intel Core i7-9700 Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
Dual Intel Xeon E5450 vs Intel Core i7-9700
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Dual Intel Xeon E5450 on one side and the Intel Core i7-9700 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the server sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,0GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,7 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
Processor | Dual Intel Xeon E5450 | Intel Core i7-9700 | ||||||
Market (main) | Server | Desktop | ||||||
ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
Microarchitecture | Penryn | Coffee Lake | ||||||
Core name | Harpertown | Coffee Lake-S | ||||||
Family | Xeon E5400 | Core i7-9000 | ||||||
Part number(s), S-Spec |
BX80574E5450A, |
CM8068403874521, |
||||||
Release date | Q4 2007 | Q2 2019 | ||||||
Lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm++ | ||||||
Transistors | 1. 640.000.000 | — | ||||||
Cores | 8 | 8 | ||||||
Threads | 8 | 8 | ||||||
Base frequency | 3,0 GHz | 3,0 GHz | ||||||
Turbo frequency | — | 4,7 GHz | ||||||
High performance cores |
8 Cores 8 Threads @ 3,0 GHz |
— |
||||||
Bus speed | 2,66 GT/s | 8 GT/s | ||||||
Cache memory | 24 MB | 12 MB | ||||||
Max memory capacity | 16 GB | 128 GB | ||||||
Memory types |
DDR2 SDRAM, DDR3 SDRAM |
DDR4-2666 |
||||||
Max # of memory channels | 6 | 2 | ||||||
Max PCIe lanes | — | 16 | ||||||
TDP | 160 W | 65 W | ||||||
Suggested PSU | 700W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
GPU integrated graphics | None | Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Coffee Lake) | ||||||
GPU execution units | — | 23 | ||||||
GPU shading units | — | 184 | ||||||
GPU base clock | — | 350 MHz | ||||||
GPU boost clock | — | 1200 MHz | ||||||
GPU FP32 floating point | — | 423,2 GFLOPS | ||||||
Socket | LGA771 | LGA1151 | ||||||
Compatible motherboard | Socket LGA 771 Motherboard | Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard | ||||||
Maximum temperature | 67°C | 100°C | ||||||
Crypto engine |
— |
AES New Instructions, |
||||||
Security |
Execute Disable Bit |
Software Guard Extensions, |
||||||
Max display resolution |
— |
4096 x 2304@60Hz |
||||||
CPU-Z single thread | 278 | 486 | ||||||
CPU-Z multi thread | 2. 280 | 3.938 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 single thread | 102 | 184 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 676 | 1.344 | ||||||
Cinebench R20 single thread | 236 | 468 | ||||||
Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 1.412 | 3.416 | ||||||
Cinebench R23 single thread | 574 | 1.184 | ||||||
Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 3.423 | 8.628 | ||||||
PassMark single thread | 1.266 | 2.785 | ||||||
PassMark CPU Mark | 4. 674 | 13.432 | ||||||
(Linux 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
1.963 | 6.278 | ||||||
(Linux 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
10.256 | 31.114 | ||||||
(Linux) Geekbench 5 single core |
453 | 1.225 | ||||||
(Linux) Geekbench 5 multi-core |
2.362 | 6.391 | ||||||
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
126,9 GFLOPS | 419,5 GFLOPS | ||||||
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
64 pts / W | 479 pts / W | ||||||
Amazon | ||||||||
eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor Intel Core i7-9700 has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i7-9700 is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Core i7-9700 is less. The Intel Core i7-9700 was started more recently.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-9700 |
486 3.938 |
Dual Intel Xeon E5450 |
278 2.280 |
In single core, the difference is 75%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 73%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-9700 |
184 1. 344 |
Dual Intel Xeon E5450 |
102 676 |
In single core, the difference is 80%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 99%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-9700 |
468 3. 416 |
Dual Intel Xeon E5450 |
236 1.412 |
In single core, the difference is 98%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 142%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-9700 |
1. 184 8.628 |
Dual Intel Xeon E5450 |
574 3.423 |
In single core, the difference is 106%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 152%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-9700 |
2. 785 13.432 |
Dual Intel Xeon E5450 |
1.266 4.674 |
In single core, the difference is 120%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 187%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-9700 |
5. 528 26.583 |
Dual Intel Xeon E5450 |
1.824 8.904 |
In single core, the difference is 203%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 199%.
On Linux 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-9700 |
6.278 31.114 |
Dual Intel Xeon E5450 |
1.963 10.256 |
In single core, the difference is 220%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 203%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-9700 |
5.944 29.147 |
Dual Intel Xeon E5450 |
1. 827 9.220 |
In single core, the difference is 225%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 216%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows:
Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-9700 |
1. 179 6.325 |
Dual Intel Xeon E5450 |
428 2.456 |
In single core, the difference is 175%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 158%.
On Linux:
Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-9700 |
1.225 6.391 |
Dual Intel Xeon E5450 |
453 2.362 |
In single core, the difference is 170%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 171%.
On macOS:
Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — macOS | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-9700 |
1.194 6.935 |
Dual Intel Xeon E5450 |
437 1. 977 |
In single core, the difference is 173%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 251%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
Dual Intel Xeon E5450 AMD equivalentIntel Core i7-9700 AMD equivalent
See also:
Intel Xeon E5450
Intel Core i7-970Intel Core i7-9700EIntel Core i7-9700FIntel Core i7-9700KIntel Core i7-9700KFIntel Core i7-9700T
CPU-Z Benchmark for Intel Xeon E5450 (1T)
Best CPU performance — 64-bit — February 2023
Intel Xeon E5450 (1T)
Back to validation
Intel Core i7-7700K
Intel Core i7-6700K
Intel Core i5-6600K
Intel Core i7-4790K
Intel Core i7-6850K
Intel Core i5-4690K
Intel Core i7-6900K
Intel Core i7-6800K
Intel Core i7-6950X
Intel Core i7-5930K
Intel Core i5-6600
Intel Core i7-4770K
Intel Core i7-6700
Intel Core i5-4670K
Intel Core i3-6100
Intel Pentium G3258
Intel Core i7-5820K
Intel Core i7-3770K
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5
Intel Core i5-3570K
Intel Core i7-4790
Intel Core i7-4930K
Intel Core i7-4820K
Intel Core i5-4690
Intel Core i7-7500U
Intel Core i7-4770
Intel Core i5-6500
Intel Pentium G4400
Intel Core i5-4670
Intel Core i7-5960X
Intel Core i3-4170
Intel Core i7-3770
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3
Intel Core i7-6820HK
Intel Core i5-4590
Intel Core i3-4160
Intel Core i5-3570
Intel Core i5-6400
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
Intel Core i5-2500K
Intel Core i5-4570
Intel Core i7-2700K
Intel Core i5-3550
Intel Core i3-4150
Intel Core i7-2600K
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
Intel Core i7-3960X
Intel Core i3-4130
Intel Core i5-3470
Intel Core i7-3820
Intel Core i5-7200U
Intel Pentium G3260
Intel Core i5-2550K
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
Intel Core i5-4460
Intel Core i7-4710MQ
Intel Core i5-4210H
Intel Core i5-3450
Intel Core i7-3930K
Intel Core i7-3520M
Intel Core i5-4200H
Intel Core i7-4700MQ
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
Intel Core i3-3240
Intel Core i5-4440
Intel Core i7-6500U
Intel Core i7 X 990
Intel Core i5-4430
Intel Core i3-3220
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
Intel Core i5-6300U
Intel Core i7-3630QM
Intel Core i5-3350P
AMD FX -9590
Intel Core i7-2600
Intel Core i5-4210M
Intel Pentium G3220
Intel Core i7-4702MQ
Intel Core i7-5500U
Intel Core i7-3610QM
Intel Core i7 X 980
Intel Core i5-3330
Intel Core i5-3320M
Intel Core i5-2500
Intel Xeon W3690
AMD FX -9370
Intel Pentium G2030
Intel Core i7-4510U
Intel Core i5-6200U
Intel Core i7-3632QM
Intel Core i5-3230M
Intel Core i5-4200M
(YOU) Intel Xeon E5450
AMD FX-8370
Intel Pentium G2020
Intel Core i7-3612QM
AMD FX -4350
Intel Core i5-2400
Intel Core i5-3210M
AMD FX -8350
AMD A10-6800K
AMD A10-7890K
Intel Xeon X5675
Intel Xeon X5470
Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3
AMD Athlon X4 880K
AMD FX-8370E
Intel Core i3-2120
Intel Xeon X5670
AMD FX -6350
Intel Core i5-4300U
Intel Core i7-2620M
Intel Core i7 870
Intel Core i5-2320
Intel Core i7 960
Intel Core i5-5200U
AMD Athlon X4 845
AMD A8-6600K
AMD A10-5800K
Intel Xeon E5-2670
Intel Core i5-2540M
AMD A6-6400K
AMD FX -8320
Intel Core i5 760
AMD A10-7870K
AMD Athlon X4 870K
Intel Core i5-2310
AMD Athlon X4 760K
Intel Core i7 950
AMD FX -8300
AMD FX -4300
AMD FX -6300
AMD Athlon X4 860K
AMD FX-8320E
Intel Core i3-2100
AMD A10-7850K
Intel Core 2 Duo E8600
Intel Core i5 650
Intel Xeon X5460
Intel Core i5-2520M
Intel Core i5-2300
Intel Core i7 860
Intel Core i3-6100U
AMD Athlon X4 750K
AMD A10-7860K
AMD A6-5400K
AMD A8-5600K
Intel Core i5 750
Intel Core i3 550
Intel Core i7-2670QM
Intel Core 2 Duo E8500
Intel Xeon E5450
AMD A10-7700K
Intel Core i5-3337U
AMD A10-7800
Intel Core i7 930
Intel Core i5-2430M
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650
Intel Core i3 540
Intel Core i5 M 560
Intel Xeon X5650
AMD A8-7600
Intel Xeon X5450
Intel Core i5-2450M
Intel Xeon X3440
AMD A8-7650K
Pentium E5700
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
Intel Core i5-2410M
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
AMD Athlon X4 740
Intel Core i7-2630QM
Intel Core 2 Duo E6850
Intel Core i3-3110M
Intel Xeon E5440
Intel Core 2 Duo E7500
Intel Core i7 920
Pentium E6500
Intel Core i3 530
Intel Core i5 M 480
Intel Pentium G620
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
Pentium E5500
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450
Intel Core i5 M 460
Intel Core i5 M 520
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
Intel Core i3-5005U
Intel Core 2 Duo E7300
Pentium E5400
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400
Pentium E5300
Intel Core 2 Duo E6750
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300
AMD FX -8150
Pentium E5200
Intel Xeon L5420
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300
Intel Core i3 M 380
Intel Core i3-2350M
Intel Core i5 M 430
Intel Core i7 Q 720
AMD FX -8120
Intel Core i3 M 370
Intel Core i3-4030U
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
Intel Core i3-2330M
Intel Core 2 Quad
AMD FX -6100
AMD FX -4100
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core i3-2310M
AMD A10-8700P
Intel Core i3 M 350
Intel Core i3-3217U
Intel Core i3-4005U
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T
Intel Core 2 Duo E4500
Intel Core i3 M 330
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T
AMD Phenom II X4 965
AMD A8-7410
AMD Phenom II X4 955
AMD Phenom II X4 B55
AMD A8-6410
AMD A8-4500M
AMD Phenom II X4 840
AMD Phenom II X4 B50
AMD A6-6310
AMD Phenom II X4 945
AMD Athlon II X2 250
AMD Athlon II X4 640
AMD Athlon II X2 245
AMD Phenom II X4 925
AMD Athlon II X4 630
AMD Athlon II X2 240
AMD Athlon II X4 620
AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+
Intel Pentium N3540
Intel Celeron N2840
Intel Celeron N3050
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
Intel Pentium Gold G5400 vs Intel Xeon E5-2640: What is the difference?
54 BALLLA
Intel Pentium Gold G5400
34 BALLLA
Intel Xeon E5-2640
Winter when compared to
VS
66 FACTICS Compared to 9000 3 INTEL PENTIUM 9000 9000. TEL RETELA Is Pentium Gold G5400 better than Intel Xeon E5-2640?
- 1067MHz higher RAM speed?
2400MHz vs 1333MHz - Is the maximum operating temperature higher than 27°C?
100°C vs 73°C - Are 18nm semiconductors smaller?
14nm vs 32nm - 37W below TDP?
58W vs 95W - Does it have integrated graphics?
- 49.45% higher PassMark score (single)?
2182 vs 1460 - 1 support higher version of DDR memory?
4 vs 3 - 0.8GT/s higher data rate?
8GT/s vs 7.2GT/s
- 2.03x higher CPU speed?
6 x 2.5GHz vs 2 x 3.7GHz - 8 more CPU threads?
12 vs 4 - 1MB more L2 cache?
1.5MB vs 0.5MB - 1.92x higher PassMark score?
10001 vs 5212 - 11MB more L3 cache?
15MB vs 4MB - 64KB more L1 cache?
192KB vs 128KB - 5. 1GB/s more memory bandwidth?
42.6GB/s vs 37.5GB/s - 686GB more max memory?
750GB vs 64GB
Which comparisons are the most popular?
Intel Pentium Gold G5400
vs
Intel Core i3-7100
Intel Xeon E5-2640
vs
Intel Xeon E5-2670
Intel Pentium Gold G5400
vs
Intel Core i5-7400
Intel Xeon E5-2640
VS
Intel Xeon E5-2620
Intel Pentium Gold Gold G5400
Intel Core i5-4430
VS
° C 9000
Intel Pentium Gold G5400
VS
Intel Core i3-8100
Intel Xeon E5-2640
VS
Intel Xeon E5-2660
VS 9000) Intel Xeon E5-2640
VS
Intel Xeon E5-1620
Intel Pentium Gold G5400
Intel Core i5-2500S
9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS
Intel Pentium Gold G5400
VS
Intel Core i3-9100F
Intel Xeon E5-2640
VS
Intel Xeon E5-2450
VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000) Intel Xeon E5-2640
VS
Intel Xeon E5-2630
Intel Pentium Gold G5400
Intel Core i3-3220
VS
9000 3 Intel Pentium Gold G5400
10. 0 /10
1 reviews of users
Functions
Price and quality ratio
10.0271 /10
2 Votes
10.0 /10 9000 /10
2 VOTES
reviews not yet
performance
10.0 /10
2 Votes
10.0 /10
1 Votes
Reliability
10.0 /10
2 Votes
10.0 /10
1 VOTES
Energy
10.0
2 votes 9000
Performance
CPU speed
2 x 3.7GHz
6 x 2.5GHz
CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second a processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
turbo clock speed
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium Gold G5400)
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
Has an unlocked multiplier of
✖Intel Pentium Gold G5400
✖Intel Xeon E5-2640
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.
L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L2 core
0.25MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
L3 core
2MB/core
2.5MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Geotagging
PassMark result
This benchmark measures CPU performance using multithreading.
PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium Gold G5400)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2640)
Cinebench R20 is a test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium Gold G5400)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2640)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium Gold G5400)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2640)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)
Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium Gold G5400)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2640)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)
Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium Gold G5400)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2640)
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
Blender result (classroom)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium Gold G5400)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2640)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
performance per watt
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium Gold G5400)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2640)
This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Integrated graphics
GPU clock speed
350MHz
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2640)
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
Turbo GPU
1050MHz
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2640)
When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
GPU Executors
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium Gold G5400)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2640)
A graphics processing unit (GPU) with more execution units can provide better graphics.
monitor support
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2640)
By using multiple displays, you can expand your workspace, making it easier to work across multiple applications.
DirectX version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2640)
DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.
OpenGL version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2640)
The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.
OpenCL version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium Gold G5400)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2640)
Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.
textured units (TMUs)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium Gold G5400)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2640)
TMUs take texture units and map them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.
imaging units ROPs
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium Gold G5400)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2640)
ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.
Memory
RAM speed
2400MHz
1333MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
maximum memory bandwidth
37.5GB/s
42.6GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
DDR version
DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of main memory. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
maximum memory
Maximum memory (RAM).
bus baud rate
7.2GT/s
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
Supports memory recovery code
✔Intel Pentium Gold G5400
✔Intel Xeon E5-2640
Memory error recovery code can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium Gold G5400)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2640)
A newer version of eMMC — Built-in Flash Memory Card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium Gold G5400)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2640)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Functions Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading provides better performance by dividing each physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads.
Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
Has AES
✔Intel Pentium Gold G5400
✔Intel Xeon E5-2640
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
Has AVX
✖Intel Pentium Gold G5400
✔Intel Xeon E5-2640
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
version of SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
Has F16C
✖Intel Pentium Gold G5400
✖Intel Xeon E5-2640
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium Gold G5400)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2640)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
Has MMX
✔Intel Pentium Gold G5400
✔Intel Xeon E5-2640
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
Has TrustZone
✖Intel Pentium Gold G5400
✖Intel Xeon E5-2640
Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and digital rights management (DRM) video streaming.
interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium Gold G5400)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2640)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better
Price comparison
Which CPUs are better?
Intel Xeon D-2183IT vs Intel Pentium Gold G5400
- Main
- CPU comparison
 / 
 / 
Overall rating
Issued
Q1/2018
Issued
Q2/2018
Overall rating
What is better to choose Intel Xeon D-2183IT or Intel Pentium Gold G5400?
We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their characteristics and benchmark results.
Intel Xeon D-2183IT has a maximum frequency of 2.20 GHz. 16 / 32 cores. Power consumption 100 W. Released Q1/2018.
The Intel Pentium Gold G5400 has a maximum frequency of 3.70 GHz. 2 cores. Power consumption 54 W. Released Q2/2018.
Differences
Characteristics
Benchmarks (tests)
Reviews
Differences
Reasons to choose
Intel Xeon D-2183IT
Report a bug
Positions in benchmark results
General positions of Intel Xeon D-2183IT CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
-
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
655 place
-
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
141 place
Reasons to choose
Intel Pentium Gold G5400
Report a bug
Positions in benchmark results
General positions of Intel Pentium Gold G5400 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
-
Cinebench R15 (Single Core)
409 place
-
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
626 place
-
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
490 place
-
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
764 place
-
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
1238 place
-
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
233 place
-
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
443 place
-
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
239 place
-
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
429 place
-
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
166 place
-
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
644 place
Characteristics
Technical data
Intel Xeon D-2183IT
Intel Pentium Gold G5400
CPU group and family
Reference information on compared processors, series, generation and market segment.
-
Series
Intel Xeon D Intel Pentium
-
CPU group
Intel Xeon D-2100 Intel Pentium G5000
-
Segment
Desktop / Server Desktop / Server
-
Generation
2 8
CPU specifications
Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, cache size. These parameters indirectly speak about the speed of the processor, the higher they are, the better.
-
Kernel architecture
normal normal
-
Acceleration
No No
-
Frequency
2. 20 GHz 3.70 GHz
IGPU
Internal graphics does not affect CPU performance, performs the work of a graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.
-
GPU
no iGPU Intel HD Graphics 610
-
GPU frequency
0.35GHz
-
GPU (Turbo)
no turbo 1.05 GHz
-
Processing units
12
-
Shaders
96
-
Max. GPU Memory
— 32 GB
-
Max. displays
3
-
Generation
9. 5
-
Tech. process
14nm
-
Issue
Q3/2016
Hardware codec support
Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speed up the work with the required operations.
RAM & PCI specifications
Types, number of channels of RAM supported by Intel Pentium Gold G5400 and Intel Xeon D-2183IT. Higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported depending on motherboards.
-
Memory type
DDR4-2400 DDR4-2400
-
Maximum memory
512GB 64GB
-
Memory channels
4 2
-
ECC
Yes Yes
Power Consumption
Compare the TDP requirements of Intel Xeon D-2183IT and Intel Pentium Gold G5400 for cooling system selection. The TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
-
TDP (PL1)
100W 54W
Technologies and extensions
Architecture, interfaces, instruction sets supported by Intel Xeon D-2183IT and Intel Xeon D-2183IT, virtualization technology and process technology.
-
Instruction set (ISA)
x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
-
ISA Extensions
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 SSE4.1, SSE4.2
-
Cash L2
22.00MB —
-
Cash L3
— 4.00 MB
-
Architecture
Skylake Coffee Lake S
-
Tech. process
14 nm 14 nm
-
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
-
Socket
BGA 2518 LGA 1151
-
Issue
Q1/2018 Q2/2018
Benchmarks (tests)
CPUs performance tests
Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately assess the performance difference between the Intel Xeon D-2183IT and the Intel Pentium Gold G5400.
Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best processor!
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform benchmark for desktop or mobile processors that is memory intensive.
Intel Xeon D-2183IT
Intel Pentium Gold G5400
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors, is memory intensive and multi-threaded.