Ym2700C4T4Mfb: Ym2200c4t4mfb Ym2200c4t20fb Ym2300c4t4mfb Ym2500c4t4mfb Ym2700c4t4mfb Stencil Kits

AMD Ryzen 7 2700U vs AMD Ryzen 5 3500U Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences








AMD Ryzen 7 2700U vs AMD Ryzen 5 3500U

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 7 2700U on one side and the AMD Ryzen 5 3500U on the other side. The first is dedicated to the high-end performance laptop sector, It has 4 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,8GHz. The second is used on the mainstream-class laptop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,7 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specification comparison:

Processor

AMD Ryzen 7 2700U

AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
Market (main)

High-end performance laptop

Mainstream-class laptop
ISA

x86-64 (64 bit)

x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture

Zen

Zen+
Core name

Raven Ridge

Picasso
Family

Ryzen 7 2000

Ryzen 5 3000
Part number(s), S-Spec

YM2700C4T4MFB

YM3500C4T4MFG


Release date

Q4 2017

Q1 2019
Lithography

14 nm

12 nm
Transistors

4. 950.000.000

4.940.000.000
Cores

4

4
Threads

8

8
Base frequency

2,2 GHz

2,1 GHz
Turbo frequency

3,8 GHz

3,7 GHz
Cache memory

4 MB

4 MB
Max memory capacity

32 GB

32 GB
Memory types

DDR4-2400

DDR4-2400


Max # of memory channels

2

2
Max memory bandwidth

35,76 GB/s

35,76 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes

12

12
TDP

15 W

15 W
GPU integrated graphics

AMD Radeon Vega 10

AMD Radeon Vega 8 (Picasso)
GPU cores

10

8
GPU shading units

640

512
GPU base clock

300 MHz

300 MHz
GPU boost clock

1. 300 MHz

1200 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point

1.792 GFLOPS

1.229 GFLOPS
Socket

FP5

FP5
Maximum temperature

95°C

105°C
CPU-Z single thread

364

366
CPU-Z multi thread

1.726

1.991
Cinebench R15 single thread

139

140
Cinebench R15 multi-thread

597

658
Cinebench R23 single thread

816

784
Cinebench R23 multi-thread

2. 803

3.451
PassMark single thread

1.703

2.112
PassMark CPU Mark

6.814

7.915
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core

3.135

3.218
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core

8.516

9.297
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance

112,1 GFLOPS

117,3 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio

568 pts / W

620 pts / W
Amazon


eBay


Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of AMD Ryzen 7 2700U is greater, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The AMD Ryzen 5 3500U was started more recently.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.





CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U

366

1. 991
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U

364

1.726

In single core, the difference is 1%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 15%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.





Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U

140

658
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U

139

597

In single core, the difference is 1%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 10%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.





Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U

784

3.451
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U

816

2.803

In single core, the difference is 4%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 23%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.





PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U

2.112

7.915
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U

1.703

6. 814

In single core, the difference is 24%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 16%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U

3.218

9.297
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U

3.135

8.516

In single core, the difference is 3%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 9%.

On Linux 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U

3.746

9.864
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U

2.765

6.011

In single core, the difference is 35%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 64%.

On Android 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U

3.496

9.049
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U

3.112

7.308

In single core, the difference is 12%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 24%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

Equivalence:

AMD Ryzen 7 2700U Intel equivalentAMD Ryzen 5 3500U Intel equivalent

See also:

AMD Ryzen 7 2700AMD Ryzen 7 2700EAMD Ryzen 7 2700X

AMD Ryzen 5 3500AMD Ryzen 5 3500CAMD Ryzen 5 3500X

YM2200C4T4MFB YM2200C4T20FB YM2300C4T4MFB YM2500C4T4MFB YM270BC4T4MFB YM3200C4T4MFG YM3500C4T4MFG Stencil





    LRF CATEGORIES





View History



 




YM2200C4T4MFB YM2200C4T20FB YM2300C4T4MFB YM2500C4T4MFB YM270BC4T4MFB YM3200C4T4MFG YM3500C4T4MFG Stencil
$3. 50
 

 
  • Description
  • Reviews (0)
  • Shipping & Payment
  • Seller Guarantees




 



 Technical Support


BGA CHIPSET OBSERVE PRECAUTIONS FOR HANDLING


BGA Chips is MOISTURE SENSITIVE DEVICES.  Devices require baking, before mounting, Here is the general bake-out process, Lay the BAG on the tray, and put it in to a baking dry cabinet. Set the temperature and time as: 125℃±5℃ x 24 hours or 80℃±5℃ x 48 hours







Pay attention to the difference between


leaded (Pb) balls and lead free (No Pb) balls.


Lead-free/No Pb BGA chips:


245℃-260℃(Maximun)


Leaded/Pb BGA chips:


180℃-205℃(Maximun)



 Sufficient Stock








 


Payment


Accept payment for PayPal, WesternUnion, AliPay, MonetyGram, Sigue, Ria, Bank transfer & Credit card



Shipment







1. Airmail Registered: If you choose this option, your item will be sent by Singapore Post Airmail.


The delivery time varies from 15-45 days in different countries. For more details, you can visit:


http://track.4px.com/?locale=en_US



2. DHL: If you choose this option, your item will be sent by DHL Express.


The delivery time is 3-7 days. Before you choose this option, please check if your location is in the DHL Remote Areas list.


You can visit: http://www.dhl.com/



3. EMS: If you choose this option, your item will be sent by EMS Express.


The delivery time varies from 5-20 days in different countries.


For more details, you can visit: http://ems.com.cn/english.html



4. The shipping time may be delayed in busy seasons. For more details, please feel free to contact us.


We are only responsible for the tax/duty generated in China.
We are NOT responsible for any tax/duty in the destination countries.
If you need items to declare the value of the customs, please leave us message.