AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies.
Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).
AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
Buy on Amazon
vs
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 3.
9x more core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 3.1x more texture fill rate: 32 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
- 16x more pipelines: 640 vs 40
- 9.8x better floating-point performance: 1,024 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark — G3D Mark: 1390 vs 1235
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench — OpenCL: 10500 vs 5106
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2862 vs 2095
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2862 vs 2095
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 27 May 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 200 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 32 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 40 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops vs 104. 0 gflops |
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 1390 vs 1235 |
| Geekbench — OpenCL | 10500 vs 5106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2862 vs 2095 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2862 vs 2095 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Around 63% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 800 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark — G2D Mark: 416 vs 344
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames): 3285 vs 1667
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.
0 — Manhattan (Fps): 3285 vs 1667
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 416 vs 344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 3285 vs 1667 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3285 vs 1667 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
| PassMark — G3D Mark |
|
|
||
| PassMark — G2D Mark |
|
|
||
| Geekbench — OpenCL |
|
|
||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 1390 | 1235 |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 344 | 416 |
| Geekbench — OpenCL | 10500 | 5106 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25. 151 |
|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 516.994 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.297 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.932 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 111.138 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2862 | 2095 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 1667 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
3326 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2862 | 2095 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 1667 | 3285 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3326 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 7.5 |
| Code name | Tropo | Haswell GT3e |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 27 May 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 899 | 563 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops | 104. 0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 40 |
| Texture fill rate | 32 GTexel / s | 10.4 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 392 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Interface | PCIe 3. 0 x16 |
PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Quick Sync |
SOLVED: Are logic boards interchangeable on the Retina, 15-inch, Mid 2015? — MacBook Pro 15″ Retina Display Mid 2015
2.
2 GHz (Turbo Boost up to 3.4 GHz), 2.5 GHz (Turbo Boost up to 3.7 GHz), or 2.8 GHz (Turbo Boost up to 4.0 GHz) quad-core Intel Core i7 processor with 6 MB shared L3 cache.
666 Questions
View all
stevenjklein
@yourmacexpert
Rep: 49
5
1
Posted:
Options
- Permalink
- History
- Subscribe
There are five different logic boards for the MacBook Pro (Retina, 15-inch, Mid 2015).
- 2.2 GHz
- 2.5 GHz
- 2.5 GHz with dual graphics
- 2.8 GHz
- 2.8 GHz with dual graphics
Can I replace a bad 2.2 GHz board with a 2.5 or 2.8 board?
Swap an integrated graphics for dual graphics?
Answered!
View the answer
I have this problem too
Is this a good question?
Yes
No
Score
1
Cancel
Chosen Solution
Dan
@danj
Rep: 449.7k
Self employed contract worker
35
297
962
Posted:
Options
- Permalink
- History
There are some differences between the IG models Vs the DG models logic boards as the IG models only have one fan and the DG models have dual fans.
I would stick with the same graphics model (IG vs DG) your system is as being the simpler direction. If you have a IG model you still can upgrade it to a DG model. But you’ll need the second fan as well as a different heat sink and gasket.
Was this answer helpful?
Yes
No
Score
4
Cancel
oldturkey03
@oldturkey03
Rep: 707.6k
822
821
2.2k
Posted:
Options
- Permalink
- History
@yourmacexpert yes you can for as long as it is the same series.
The boards you listed (Can I replace a bad 2.2 GHz board with a 2.5 or 2.8 board) will qualify for replacement.
Was this answer helpful?
Yes
No
Score
1
Cancel
Gene
@surfside
Rep: 1
1
Posted:
Options
- Permalink
- History
I have 2 Mid 2015 MacBook Pros.
One is the top-tier Mid-2015 — 2.
8GHz 16GB with AMD Radeon R9 M370X 2048 MB / Intel Iris Pro 1536 MB.
It’s in poor shape, with a cracked screen.
The other is also a Mid-2015 — 2.2GHz 16GB MJLQ2LL/A (2.2 GHz) with Intel Iris Pro 5200.
It’s in almost perfect shape.
If I understand Dan’s reply, is there any reason that I couldn’t take the logic board along with the second fan and heat sink from the one with the cracked screen and put it in the other one?
Was this answer helpful?
Yes
No
Score
0
Cancel
Buy Certified Used Mac
Intel Iris Pro 1536 MB w/ AMD Radeon R9 M370X 2 GB» – ItsWorthMore
-
Surface Duo 128GB Glacier (GSM Unlocked)
Surface Duo 128GB
Glacier (GSM Unlocked)128GB
— Glacier
Works with
- Regular price
-
$306.
99 - Sale price
-
$306.99 — $486.99
Available Conditions
Excellent
-
MacBook Pro 16″ (2021)
MacBook Pro 16″ (2021)
3.
2GHz M1 Pro 10-Core CPU16GB Unified Memory
512GB SSD
— Silver
- Regular price
-
$1,733.
99 - Sale price
-
$1,611.99 — $1,733.99
Available Conditions
Excellent
-
MacBook Pro 16″ (2021)
MacBook Pro 16″ (2021)
3.
2GHz M1 Pro 10-Core CPU16GB Unified Memory
512GB SSD
— Space Gray
- Regular price
-
$1,733.
99 - Sale price
-
$1,611.99 — $1,733.99
Available Conditions
Excellent
-
MacBook Pro 16″ (2021)
MacBook Pro 16″ (2021)
3.
2GHz M1 Pro 10-Core CPU16GB Unified Memory
1TB SSD
— Silver
- Regular price
-
$1,937.
99 - Sale price
-
$1,784.99 — $1,979.99
Available Conditions
Excellent
Compare AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 video cards by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory, Technology support.
Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T -Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.
0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).
AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
versus
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Benefits
Reasons to choose AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
- Newer graphics card, release dates difference 1 year(s) 11 month(s) 9019 core times 9002 (a) more: 775 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 3.1 times more texturing speed: 32 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
- 16 times more shader processors: 640 vs 40
- 9.8 times better floating point performance: 1,024 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
- Approx. ) more: 10500 vs 5106
- About 37% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 benchmark — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2862 vs 2095
- About 37% more performance in GFXBench 4.
0 benchmark — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2862 vs 2095
| Production date | 5 May 2015 vs 27 May 2013 |
| Core frequency | 775 MHz vs 200 MHz |
| Texturing speed | 32 GTexel/s vs 10.4 GTexel/s |
| Number of shader processors | 640 vs 40 |
| Floating point performance | 1.024 gflops vs 104.0 gflops |
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 1390 vs 1235 |
| Geekbench — OpenCL | 10500 vs 5106 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
2862 vs 2095 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2862 vs 2095 |
Reasons to choose Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Boost core clock 63% higher: 1300 MHz vs 800 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process for the video card allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- Performance in the PassMark — G2D Mark benchmark is about 21% higher: 416 vs 344
- Performance in the GFXBench 4.0 benchmark — About 97% more Manhattan (Frames): 3285 vs 1667
- Performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) about 97% more: 3285 vs 1667
| Boost core clock | 1300 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Process | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 416 vs 344 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
3285 vs 1667 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3285 vs 1667 |
Benchmark comparison
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
| PassMark — G3D Mark |
|
|||
| PassMark — G2D Mark |
|
|||
| Geekbench — OpenCL |
|
|||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps) |
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 1390 | 1235 |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 344 | 416 |
| Geekbench — OpenCL | 10500 | 5106 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25. 151 |
|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 516.994 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.297 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.932 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 111.138 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2862 | 2095 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 1667 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
3326 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2862 | 2095 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 1667 | 3285 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3326 |
Performance comparison
| AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 7.5 |
| Codename | Tropo | Haswell GT3e |
| Production date | May 5, 2015 | 27 May 2013 |
| Place in the ranking | 899 | 563 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Boost core clock | 800MHz | 1300MHz |
| Core frequency | 775MHz | 200MHz |
| Floating point performance | 1. 024 gflops |
104.0 gflops |
| Process | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Number of shaders | 640 | 40 |
| Texturing speed | 32 GTexel/s | 10.4 GTexel/s |
| Number of transistors | 1,500 million | 392 million |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
| Video connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Interface | PCIe 3. 0 x16 |
PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Notebook size | medium sized | |
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
| Maximum memory size | 2GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory frequency | 4500MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Quick Sync |
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs AMD Radeon R9 M370X.
Comparative characteristics and benchmarks of video cards
VS
General information
The general information section of the video card comparison list contains release date, type, overall rating and other useful data to determine the winner between Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 and AMD Radeon R9 M370X. Please note that the comparison takes place on all indicators, and below are the ratings from synthetic benchmarks that define different criteria in games and work applications.
468
Performance rating position
Specifications
Which graphics card is better in Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs AMD Radeon R9 M370X comparison in manufacturing process, power consumption, and base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part contained in the rating of graphics cards.
576
Pipelines
640
350 MHz
Core Clock
800 MHz
0002 Acceleration
No data
189 Million
Transistors
1500 Million
14 NM
Technological process
28 NM
15 WATT
Power consumption
No data 9000 75.
60 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 Number of texels processed in 1 second
N/A
72
Pipelines / CUDA cores
640
1100 MHz
Overclocking speed
No data
189 Million
The number of transistors
1500 Million
15 WATT
Called thermal capacity
No data
Size, connectors and compatibility
Let’s discuss what sizes (length, width, height) for Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 and AMD Radeon R9 M370X. As well as the main types of connectors and connected interfaces
PCIe 3.0 x1
Interface
No data
N/A
Laptop size
medium sized
Memory (frequency and overclocking)
Graphics card memory plays an important role in both gaming and graphics applications. The higher the standard ( GDDR ), the better. It directly affects the speed and efficiency of data processing.
What is the difference in type, base and turbo frequency, GDDR bandwidth between Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 and AMD Radeon R9 M370X:
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5
64 GB
Maximum RAM AMOUNT
2 GB
No data
Dressing of memory tire
128 Bit
No data
Frequencies of memory
4500 MHZ
+
+
9000.S. —
Port and display support
Let’s find out the difference in ports that Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 and AMD Radeon R9 M370X are equipped with. Pay attention to the number of ports and the maximum resolution of supported monitors.
No outputs
Display connections
No data
Technologies
Let’s see what the difference is. It is worth noting that NVIDIA and AMD use different technologies.
+
Quick Sync
n.a.
n.a. Hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not taken into account in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests.
12 (12_1)
DirectX
DirectX 12 (FL 11_1), Shader 5.0
4.6
Opengl
1.1.
n.a.
2.1
OpenCL
n.a.0017
| one. | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs. NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | |
| 2. | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs. AMD Radeon HD 7870 | |
3.
|
AMD Radeon R5 M330 vs. AMD Radeon R9 M370X | |
| four. | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs. NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC | |
| 5. |
AMD Cayman vs. AMD Radeon R9 M370X
|
|
| 6. | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs. NVIDIA NVS 510 | |
| 7. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M vs. Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 | |
| eight. |
AMD Radeon R9 M370X vs. AMD Baffin
|
|
| 9. | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs. NVIDIA GeForce 820A | |
| ten. | AMD Radeon HD 6740G2 vs. AMD Radeon R9 M370X | |
| eleven. |
AMD Radeon R9 M370X vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
|
|
| 12. | NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT vs. AMD Radeon R9 M370X | |
| 13. | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs. AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | |
| fourteen. |
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs. AMD Hainan
|
|
| fifteen. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs. AMD Radeon R9M370X |
A1398 i7/16/amd Radeon R9 | Festima.Ru
Electronics
Table
List
Tape
Motherboard
We found this ad 2 years ago
Click Follow and the system will automatically notify you of new offers from all bulletin boards
Go to announcement
Complaint type
OtherCopyright infringementProhibited informationAd out of datePornographySpam
Comment
Show original
More announcements
Macbook Pro (Retina, 15-inch, Mid 2015, A1398) 02S16H8G8W — serial 16 GB RAM, 512 GB SSD, AMD Radeon R9 M370X, i7 4870HQ.
The matrix is broken, the battery is half dead, there are scratches on the case, there is a small chip in the needle. For good, also clean it and lubricate the fans. Otherwise, everything works, you can connect it to a monitor and use it as a stationary PC. In total, the repair goes to 50k + -, for me it’s a lot and I don’t see the point, it’s easier to sell it for spare parts. Bargaining is appropriate, but I won’t sell it for a penny, if it doesn’t work out, I’ll take it apart and sell it separately.
Laptops
a year ago
Source
Motherboard 820-00138 820-00163 820-00426 for Macbook Pro 15″ Retina A1398 2015 New. Original. Processor 2.3-2.7 Mhz Intel Core i7 Memory 16 Gb 1600 MHz DDR3 Graphics AMD Radeon R9 M370X 2GB + Intel Iris Graphics 6100 1.5GB Can be installed in our specialized Apple service center Also available are any spare parts for Apple equipment
Computer accessories and components
2 years ago
Source
Motherboard 820-00138 820-00163 820-00426 for Macbook Pro 15″ Retina A1398 2015 New.
Original. Processor 2.3-2.7 Mhz Intel Core i7 Memory 16 Gb 1600 MHz DDR3 Graphics AMD Radeon R9 M370X 2GB + Intel Iris Graphics 6100 1.5GB Can be installed in our specialized Apple service center Also available are any spare parts for Apple equipment
Computer accessories and components
Moscow, st. Malaya Yakimanka, 24
2 years ago
Source
Model: A1398 EMC 2910 Processor: Intel Core i7 Memory (RAM): 16 GB 1600 MHz DDR3 Recharge cycles: 189 Video card: AMD Radeon R9 M370X Memory: 512 GB SSD
Notebooks
St. Petersburg, Vereiskaya st., 22-24B
2 years ago
Source
Attention! Festima.Ru is a search engine for ads from popular sites.
We do not sell goods, we do not store images and personal data.
All images belong to their respective authors
Denial of responsibility
Motherboard
Computer accessories and components
2 years ago
Source
Apple Macbook Pro 15 2015 model: A1398 Condition 9 of 10 Number of recharge cycles 626 excellent condition, screen as new, no scratches _________________________________ Processor : Intel Core i7 @ 2.
5 Ghz RAM : 16 GB Video card : AMD Radeon R9 M370X 2gb Intel IRIS Pro 1536, 1536 Mb SSD : 512g Installed OS: MacOS Mojave but you can install Catalina Accounts are unlinked.
Laptops
2 years ago
Source
sell macbook pro retina 15 inch mid 2015 A1398 condition good processor intel core i7 2.5GHz ram 16gb ssd 512gb original video card intel iris pro amd radeon r9 m370x new screen new battery
laptops
a year ago
Source
MacBook Pro 15 Retina A1398 Mid 2015 Processor 2.5 Intel Core i7 Memory 16 GB Graphics AMD Radeon R9 M370X 2 GB SSD 250 GB angle, I can’t take a picture. Charger included.
Laptops
Moscow
2 years ago
Source
MacBook Pro 15 Retina A1398 Mid 2015 Processor 2.5 Intel Core i7 Memory 16 GB Graphics AMD Radeon R9 M370X 2 GB SSD 512 GB There are slight traces of use — no drops on the cover on the aluminum side, visible only under angle, I can’t take a picture.
Charger included.
Notebooks
Moscow
2 years ago
Source
For sale Apple Macbook pro 15 Mid 2015 Excellent condition. Number of cycles 85. Specifications Model A1398 Proc. Intel core i7 Memory DDR3 16gb Graphics intel iris pro 1536gb Graphics AMD Radeon R9 M370X 2gb SSD 512 gb Includes charger only Reason for selling, Macbook pro 16
Laptops
2 years ago
Source
Pro 2015 15 2.5 i7 16 512 M370X RU 1 cycle battery serial number C02QD42MG8WP Apple MacBook Pro 15 Retina, Mid 2015 in good condition. Cool laptop, without technical nuances and surprises, fully tested, everything works 100%, iCloud is clean! Model — A1398 Screen — Retina 2880×1800 Processor — Intel i7- 2.5 — 3.4 GHz (Turbo Boost) RAM — 16 Gb SSD — 512 Video card — Intel Iris Pro 1.5Gb + AMD Radeon R M370X 2Gb R47f
Notebooks
2 years ago
Source
Apple 15-inch MacBook Pro with Retina display Selling Apple MacBook Pro 15 Retina, Mid 2015, mjlt2, A1398 in good condition.
Powerful laptop, works stably, no complaints! Model range Mid 2015 Model — mjlt2 / A1398 Screen — Retina 2880×1800 CPU — Intel Core i7 2.5 — 3.4 GHz (Turbo Boost) RAM 16 Gb SSD 512 gb Intel Iris Pro 5200 & AMD Radeon R9M370X with 2GB VRAM 770 recharge cycles
2 years ago
Source
Selling Apple MacBook Pro 15 (Retina, Mid 2015, MJLQ2, A1398) in almost PERFECT condition (9.8/10). Cool laptop, no nuances or surprises, fully tested, everything works 100%, iCloud is clean! Includes laptop and original MagSafe2 85W charger. Model range — 2015 Model — MJLQ2LL / A1398 Screen — Retina 2880×1800 Proc — Intel i7 2.5 — 3.4 GHz (Turbo Boost) RAM — 16 Gb SSD 512 gb Amd Radeon R9M370X 2 gb Intel Iris pro 1536 mb 470 recharge cycles
Notebooks
2 years ago
Source
Macbook pro a1398 mid 2015 ( Manufactured mid 2016) Intel core i7 2.5 ghz (4870hq) 16 gb ram ssd 512 gb Iris pro 5200 Amd radeon r9 m370x 2 gb 15.
4 retina no dead pixels. Force touch 634 recharge cycles of native battery (88% health) Includes laptop and charger. Removed from all passwords.
Notebooks
a year ago
Source
Laptop in excellent condition. Mid 2015 model A1398. Produced in 2016. Keys, ports, wifi, bluetooth, everything is fine. Characteristics also laid out in the photo. processor Intel core i7 2.8 GHz 16 GB RAM ssd storage 512 GB Intel iris graphics 1.5 GB + AMD Radeon R9 M370X 2 GB native battery.
Notebooks
a year ago
Source
Excellent condition, complete set. – Model A1398 – Intel Core i7 2.5 Ghz – Intel Iris Pro 5200 + AMD Radeon R9M370X 2 GB — 16 GB RAM — 512 GB SSD In 2019, the battery was replaced by an authorized service center under the battery recall program. Therefore only 220 recharge cycles. In 2020, the thermal paste was changed and cleaned, after which it was used minimally. Of the minuses: the charging cable is a little peeled off, but it works properly.
Notebooks
a year ago
Source
Apple Laptop MacBook Pro 15″ A1398 mid 2015 in excellent condition with two graphics cards The screen is in perfect order, the anti-glare coating is normal. Specifications: Processor — 2.5 GHz Intel Core i7 RAM — 16 GB 1600 MHz DDR3 Hard drive — 256 GB SSD Graphics — AMD Radeon R9M370 X 2 gb Intel Iris Pro 1536 mb Battery — 750 recharge cycles Charger included.
Notebooks
a year ago
Source
MacBook Pro 15 retina 2015 Processor 2.5 GHz intel core i7 Memory 16 gb 1600 MHz DDR3 Graphics AMD RADEON R9 M370X 2048mb Intel iris pro 1536mb SSD 512 Hello everyone! I’m selling an excellent laptop, the number of charges at the moment is 89 Damage, no scratches, from the word it’s completely, completely serviceable, model A1398, it was taken out of the house a couple of times in a case + keyboard overlay, the reason for the sale was the purchase of 13 pro.