Radeon 265: AMD Radeon R7 265 Specs

AMD Radeon R7 265 review

32points

AMD Radeon R7 265

AMD Radeon R7 265

Why is AMD Radeon R7 265 better than the average?

• Thermal Design Power (TDP)?
  150Wvs191.46W
• DVI outputs?
  2vs0.79
• Width?
  210mmvs256.02mm

Which are the most popular comparisons?

AMD Radeon R7 265

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

AMD Radeon R7 265

vs

AMD Radeon R7 360

AMD Radeon R7 265

vs

Sapphire Radeon R7 370 Dual-X

AMD Radeon R7 265

vs

AMD Radeon HD 7850

AMD Radeon R7 265

vs

AMD Radeon R9 270X

AMD Radeon R7 265

vs

AMD Radeon RX 460

AMD Radeon R7 265

vs

Asus Dragon HD 7850 DirectCU II 2GB

AMD Radeon R7 265

vs

Asus Strix GeForce GTX 750 Ti OC 4GB

AMD Radeon R7 265

vs

EVGA GeForce GTX 750

AMD Radeon R7 265

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 560

Price comparison

User reviews

Performance

1. GPU clock speed

900MHz

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

2.GPU turbo

925MHz

When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

3.pixel rate

28.8 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

4.floating-point performance

1.84 TFLOPS

Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.

5.texture rate

57.6 GTexels/s

The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

1400MHz

The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth.

7.shading units

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.

8.texture mapping units (TMUs)

TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.

9.render output units (ROPs)

The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.

Memory

1.effective memory speed

5600MHz

The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

179.2GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of a graphics card. More VRAM generally allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4.memory bus width

256bit

A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card.

5.version of GDDR memory

Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance.

6.Supports ECC memory

✖AMD Radeon R7 265

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

Features

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

2.OpenGL version

OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

3.OpenCL version

Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.

4.Supports multi-display technology

✔AMD Radeon R7 265

The graphics card supports multi-display technology. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view.

5.load GPU temperature

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.

A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.

6.supports ray tracing

✖AMD Radeon R7 265

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games.

7. Supports 3D

✔AMD Radeon R7 265

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses).

8.supports DLSS

✖AMD Radeon R7 265

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an upscaling technology powered by AI. It allows the graphics card to render games at a lower resolution and upscale them to a higher resolution with near-native visual quality and increased performance. DLSS is only available on select games.

9.PassMark (G3D) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.

This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.

Ports

1.has an HDMI output

✔AMD Radeon R7 265

Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.

2.HDMI ports

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.

More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.

3.HDMI version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.

Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.

4.DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.

5.DVI outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.

6.mini DisplayPort outputs

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.

Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort.

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best graphics cards?

AMD Radeon R7 265 Specs, Price, and FPS in Games

---

2 GB	GDDR5	256-bit	179.2 GB/s
Memory Size	Memory Type	Memory Bus	Memory Bandwidth

Pixel Fillrate

29. 6 GPixel/s

9%

Texture Fillrate

59.2 GTexel/s

7%

Availability

MSRP in USD: $149

No items available

Processor

Resolution

Select game resolution

Graphics Settings

Select game graphics

Offset

…

Apply Offset

Value Rating

Performance Rating

Value per FPS

You will receive

… FPS

486

FPS

League of Legends

112

FPS

Grand Theft Auto V

216

FPS

VALORANT

133

FPS

Apex Legends

119

FPS

Fortnite

100

FPS

PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds

Alternatives for Radeon R7 265

1080p, High

No alternatives — this is the best option

Specifications

General
Release Date	Feb 13th, 2014
Generation	Volcanic Islands
Outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Power Connectors	1x 6-pin
Power Consumption	150 W

Performance
Base Clock Speed	900 MHz
Boost Clock Speed	925 MHz
Memory Clock Speed	1400 MHz
Pixel Fillrate	29. 6 GPixel/s
Texture Fillrate	59.2 GTexel/s

Memory
Memory Size	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5
Memory Bus	256-bit
Memory Bandwidth	179.2 GB/s

Find out which of the 2 GPUs performs better, view a side-by-side specification comparison.

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

$1,199.95

Radeon R7 265

N/A Stock

GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB

$1,294.9

Radeon R7 265

N/A Stock

GeForce RTX 2060

Radeon R7 265

N/A Stock

GeForce RTX 3050

$319.99

Radeon R7 265

N/A Stock

GeForce RTX 3080

Radeon R7 265

N/A Stock

Radeon RX 6800 XT

$619.99

Radeon R7 265

N/A Stock

Refine results to filter 325 graphics cards by performance, release date, price, and value. Click on a GPU to view more in-depth specifications and game FPS.

Found 325 GPUs.

Popularity

Graphics Card

Performance

GeForce RTX 3070

Release Date: Sep 1st, 2020

---

Performance Rating

---

$569.99 on Amazon

In Stock

---

Radeon RX 6600

Release Date: Oct 13th, 2021

---

Performance Rating

---

$249.99 on Amazon

In Stock

---

GeForce RTX 3060

Release Date: Jan 12th, 2021

---

Performance Rating

---

$399.99 on Amazon

In Stock

---

GeForce RTX 2060

Release Date: Jan 7th, 2019

---

Performance Rating

---

$350 on Amazon

In Stock

---

GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB

Release Date: Dec 7th, 2021

---

Performance Rating

---

$299 on Amazon

In Stock

---

GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB

Release Date: Jan 11th, 2022

---

Performance Rating

---

$1,294. 9 on Amazon

In Stock

---

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Release Date: Feb 22nd, 2019

---

Performance Rating

---

$218.99 on Amazon

In Stock

---

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Release Date: May 31st, 2021

---

Performance Rating

---

$709.99 on Amazon

In Stock

---

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

Release Date: Oct 29th, 2019

---

Performance Rating

---

$229.55 on Amazon

In Stock

---

Radeon RX 6700 XT

Release Date: Mar 3rd, 2021

---

Performance Rating

---

$419.99 on Amazon

In Stock

---

GeForce RTX 3090

Release Date: Sep 1st, 2020

---

Performance Rating

---

$1,393.99 on Amazon

In Stock

---

GeForce GT 730

Release Date: Jun 18th, 2014

---

Performance Rating

---

$58.99 on Amazon

In Stock

---

GeForce GT 1030

Release Date: May 17th, 2017

---

Performance Rating

---

$89.99 on Amazon

In Stock

---

GeForce GTX 1650

Release Date: Apr 23rd, 2019

---

Performance Rating

---

$189. 99 on Amazon

In Stock

---

GeForce RTX 3080

Release Date: Sep 1st, 2020

---

Performance Rating

---

$925 on Amazon

In Stock

---

GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER

Release Date: Jul 9th, 2019

---

Performance Rating

---

$329.99 on Amazon

In Stock

---

Radeon RX 6900 XT

Release Date: Oct 28th, 2020

---

Performance Rating

---

$809.99 on Amazon

In Stock

---

Radeon RX 6600 XT

Release Date: Jul 30th, 2021

---

Performance Rating

---

$339.99 on Amazon

In Stock

---

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Release Date: Oct 25th, 2016

---

Performance Rating

---

$178.9 on Amazon

In Stock

---

GeForce RTX 3050

Release Date: Jan 4th, 2022

---

Performance Rating

---

$319.99 on Amazon

In Stock

---

Radeon RX 6800 XT

Release Date: Oct 28th, 2020

---

Performance Rating

---

$619.99 on Amazon

In Stock

---

Radeon RX 550

Release Date: Apr 20th, 2017

---

Performance Rating

---

$139. 98 on Amazon

In Stock

---

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Release Date: Dec 1st, 2020

---

Performance Rating

---

$369.99 on Amazon

In Stock

---

GeForce GT 710

Release Date: Jan 26th, 2016

---

Performance Rating

---

$69.99 on Amazon

In Stock

---

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Release Date: May 31st, 2021

---

Performance Rating

---

$1,199.95 on Amazon

In Stock

---

• Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• …
• 11
• 12
• 13
• Next

Radeon R7 265 [in 1 benchmark]

Radeon R7 265

Buy

• Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
• Core clock speed 0
• Max video memory 4096 MB
• Memory type GDDR5
• Memory clock speed 1400
• Maximum resolution

Summary

AMD started Radeon R7 265 sales 13 February 2014 at a recommended price of $149. This is GCN 1.0 architecture desktop card based on 28 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at gamers. 4 GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 1.4 GHz are supplied, and together with 256 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 179.2 GB/s.

Compatibility-wise, this is dual-slot card attached via PCIe 3.0 x16 interface. Its manufacturer default version has a length of 210 mm. 1 x 6-pin power connector is required, and power consumption is at 150 Watt.

We have no data on Radeon R7 265 benchmark results.

General info

Of Radeon R7 265’s architecture, market segment and release date.

Place in performance rating	not rated
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code name	Pitcairn
Market segment	Desktop
Design	reference
Release date	13 February 2014 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$149
Current price	$327 (2. 2x MSRP)	of 49999 (A100 SXM4)

Technical specs

Radeon R7 265’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Radeon R7 265’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	of 18432 (AD102)
Boost clock speed	925 MHz	of 2903 (Radeon Pro W6600)
Number of transistors	2,800 million	of 14400 (GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile)
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	of 4 (GeForce RTX 4080 Ti)
Thermal design power (TDP)	150 Watt	of 900 (Tesla S2050)
Texture fill rate	59. 20	of 939.8 (h200 SXM5)
Floating-point performance	1,894 gflops	of 16384 (Radeon Pro Duo)

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Radeon R7 265’s compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it’s interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	210 mm
Width	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1 x 6-pin

Memory

Parameters of memory installed on Radeon R7 265: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don’t have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	of 128 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory bus width	256 Bit	of 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory clock speed	1400 MHz	of 21000 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti)
Memory bandwidth	179.2 GB/s	of 14400 (Radeon R7 M260)

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on Radeon R7 265. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Eyefinity	1
HDMI	+
DisplayPort support	—

Technologies

Technological solutions and APIs supported by Radeon R7 265. You’ll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	—
CrossFire	1
Enduro	—
FreeSync	1
HD3D	—
PowerTune	—
TrueAudio	—
ZeroCore	—
DDMA audio	+

API support

APIs supported by Radeon R7 265, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12
Shader Model	5.1
OpenGL	4.6
OpenCL	1. 2
Mantle	—

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance of Radeon R7 265. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

---

• 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920×1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R7 265
5220

---

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Radeon R7 265. Usually measured in megahashes per second.

Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)

14. 5 Mh/s

NVIDIA equivalent

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Radeon R7 265 from NVIDIA is GeForce GTX 1050.

GeForce GTX
1050

Compare

Similar GPUs

Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

Radeon HD
6930

Compare

Radeon R7
260X

Compare

GeForce GTX
660

Compare

Radeon HD
7790

Compare

Radeon HD
7850

Compare

Radeon R7
360

Compare

Recommended processors

These processors are most commonly used with Radeon R7 265 according to our statistics.

FX
6300

5.1%

Core i5
3470

3.4%

FX
8350

3.1%

FX
4300

2.5%

FX
8300

2.3%

Ryzen 3
1200

1.7%

Core i5
4460

1.7%

Athlon II
X2 250

1. 7%

Athlon II
X4 640

1.7%

Core i5
2300

1.4%

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.

---

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Radeon R7 265, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.

---

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

GPU Compare | Graphics Card Comparison

The Radeon R7 265 will run 78% of the top 10,000 PC games. It will also run 47% of these games at the recommended or best experience levels.

Manufacturer

AMD

Generation

10 generations old

Category

High Performance

Dedicated RAM

2. 0 GB

DirectX

12

Rank

75th percentile of AMD GPUs

Rank in Power

129th of AMD GPUs

Rank in Popularity

313rd of AMD GPUs

Can the Radeon R7 265 run the Top PC games? You can see a GPU comparison by choosing another video card. How many games can your GPU run?

		Radeon R7 265 Choose Another. ..	Radeon RX 6950 XT Choose Another…
Rank	Game	Min Rec	Min Rec
1	Overwatch 2
2	Grand Theft Auto V
3	Cyberpunk 2077
4	FIFA 23
5	VALORANT
6	Call of Duty: Warzone
7	Elden Ring
8	Red Dead Redemption 2
9	Fortnite
10	Minecraft
11	Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered
12	Need for Speed Heat
13	League of Legends
14	Genshin Impact
15	God of War
16	Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
17	Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
18	Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
19	Forza Horizon 5
20	Apex Legends
21	Overwatch
22	FIFA 22
23	The Sims 4
24	PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS
25	The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
26	Far Cry 6
27	Phasmophobia
28	Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
29	Assassin’s Creed: Origins
30	Battlefield 2042
31	Fallout 76
32	Dying Light 2 Stay Human
33	Fallout 4
34	Forza Horizon 4
35	Call of Duty: Modern Warfare
36	Assassin’s Creed Unity
37	Grounded
38	ARK: Survival Evolved
39	Assassin’s Creed IV Black Flag
40	Call of Duty: Black Ops II
41	Battlefield 1
42	Call of Duty: WW2
43	Rust
44	Batman: Arkham Knight
45	GTA 5 Thor Mod
46	Paladins
47	Rocket League
48	Grand Theft Auto IV
49	Detroit: Become Human
50	Middle-earth: Shadow of War
51	Destiny 2
52	The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
53	Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six: Siege
54	WARZONE
55	Escape from Tarkov
56	Assassin’s Creed Mirage
57	CS:GO — Operation Riptide
58	Far Cry 3
59	Call of Duty: Black Ops III
60	Dota 2
61	Assassin’s Creed II
62	GTA 5 Premium Online Edition
63	PUBG Lite
64	Roblox
65	Far Cry 5
66	Dark Souls 3
67	World of Warcraft
68	SEKIRO: SHADOWS DIE TWICE
69	Far Cry 4
70	Assassin’s Creed Syndicate
71	Sea of Thieves
72	Assassin’s Creed
73	Battlefield 4
74	Forza Horizon 3
75	Mortal Kombat 11
76	Hogwarts Legacy
77	Battlefield 5
78	Fortnite: Battle Royale
79	Assassin’s Creed Rogue
80	World War 3
81	Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
82	Assassin’s Creed III
83	The Forest
84	Persona 5 Royal
85	FIFA 19
86	Fall Guys: Ultimate Knockout
87	Manor Lords
88	Dying Light
89	Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3
90	eFootball 2022
91	Marauders
92	Shatterline
93	FIFA 17
94	Stray
95	Dead by Daylight
96	Borderlands 3
97	Euro Truck Simulator 2
98	Ready or Not
99	Valheim
100	Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020

AMD

NVIDIA

Intel

Rank	GPU

R7 265 benchmark with Ryzen 5 2600 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K benchmarks at Ultra Quality

Compare To
Select. .AMD Radeon 530 Mobile — $ 636AMD Radeon 540 Mobile — $ 1,086AMD Radeon HD 6850 — $ 199AMD Radeon HD 6870 — $ 199AMD Radeon HD 6950 — $ 250AMD Radeon HD 6970 — $ 299AMD Radeon HD 6990 — $ 699AMD Radeon HD 7750 — $ 140AMD Radeon HD 7750M — $ 858AMD Radeon HD 7790 — $ 149AMD Radeon HD 7850 — $ 249AMD Radeon HD 7850M — $ 964AMD Radeon HD 7950 — $ 149AMD Radeon HD 7950M — $ 1,023AMD Radeon HD 7970 — $ 299AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition — $ 299AMD Radeon HD 7970M — $ 1,079AMD Radeon HD 7990 — $ 999AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile — $ 1,959AMD Radeon R5 — $ 710AMD Radeon R5 — $ 701AMD Radeon R7 250 — $ 95AMD Radeon R7 370 — $ 202AMD Radeon R9 270 — $ 275AMD Radeon R9 280 — $ 350AMD Radeon R9 280X — $ 350AMD Radeon R9 285 — $ 380AMD Radeon R9 290 — $ 310AMD Radeon R9 290X — $ 399AMD Radeon R9 295X2 — $ 1,499AMD Radeon R9 380 — $ 299AMD Radeon R9 380X — $ 229AMD Radeon R9 390 — $ 465AMD Radeon R9 390X — $ 495AMD Radeon R9 FURY — $ 549AMD Radeon R9 FURY X — $ 649AMD Radeon R9 M270X — $ 1,016AMD Radeon R9 M280X — $ 1,070AMD Radeon R9 M280X 2GB — $ 1,070AMD Radeon R9 M290X — $ 1,209AMD Radeon R9 M380 — $ 1,074AMD Radeon R9 Nano — $ 1,529AMD Radeon RX 460 — $ 140AMD Radeon RX 470 — $ 342AMD Radeon RX 470 Mobile — $ 1,203AMD Radeon RX 480 — $ 399AMD Radeon RX 480 Mobile — $ 1,275AMD Radeon RX 540 Mobile — $ 645AMD Radeon RX 550 — $ 74AMD Radeon RX 550 Mobile — $ 923AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB — $ 169AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB — $ 199AMD Radeon RX 550X Mobile — $ 923AMD Radeon RX 560 — $ 99AMD Radeon RX 560 Mobile — $ 987AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT — $ 279AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile — $ 641AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile 2GB — $ 987AMD Radeon RX 570 — $ 123AMD Radeon RX 570 Mobile — $ 1,260AMD Radeon RX 5700 — $ 349AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT — $ 399AMD Radeon RX 580 — $ 151AMD Radeon RX 580 Mobile — $ 1,307AMD Radeon RX 580X Mobile — $ 1,307AMD Radeon RX 590 — $ 214AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT — $ 379AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT — $ 479AMD Radeon RX 6800 — $ 579AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT — $ 649AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT — $ 999AMD Radeon RX VEGA 10 — $ 632AMD Radeon RX VEGA 3 — $ 567AMD Radeon RX VEGA 6 — $ 1,119AMD Radeon RX VEGA 8 — $ 601AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 — $ 269AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile — $ 1,579AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 — $ 419AMD Radeon VII — $ 664ATI Radeon HD 4870 — $ 299NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 — $ 79NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 — $ 79NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 — $ 199NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 — $ 129NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q — $ 1,282NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile — $ 750NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 2GB — $ 1,062NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti — $ 129NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q — $ 1,270NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile — $ 876NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB — $ 170NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB — $ 159NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q — $ 1,185NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile — $ 987NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 — $ 329NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q — $ 1,106NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile — $ 1,559NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti — $ 503NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 — $ 522NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q — $ 1,955NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile — $ 1,857NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti — $ 807NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 — $ 149NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q — $ 1,239NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile — $ 1,151NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER — $ 160NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 — $ 220NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER — $ 229NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti — $ 279NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q — $ 1,185NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile — $ 1,758NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 — $ 449NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 — $ 299NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 — $ 649NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 — $ 249NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 — $ 299NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 — $ 499NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti — $ 199NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 — $ 153NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti — $ 220NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 — $ 349NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 — $ 399NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 — $ 699NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 — $ 49NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti — $ 64NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost — $ 169NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 — $ 79NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti — $ 299NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M — $ 987NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 — $ 79NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M — $ 1,058NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX — $ 1,058NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 — $ 485NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M — $ 1,083NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 — $ 439NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti — $ 279NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 — $ 320NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M — $ 1,036NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 — $ 179NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M — $ 1,100NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 — $ 355NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti — $ 410NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M — $ 1,162NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M — $ 1,162NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 — $ 89NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 — $ 89NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M — $ 1,066NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 — $ 449NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M — $ 1,249NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M 6GB — $ 1,249NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 — $ 249NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Mobile — $ 1,345NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti — $ 619NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M — $ 1,345NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980MX — $ 1,345NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN — $ 650NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK — $ 999NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X — $ 1,099NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 — $ 349NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile — $ 1,104NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER — $ 400NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 — $ 469NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q — $ 1,516NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile — $ 1,724NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER — $ 499NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 — $ 693NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q — $ 1,772NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile — $ 1,942NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER — $ 699NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti — $ 1,187NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 — $ 200NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti — $ 249NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 — $ 329NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti — $ 399NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 — $ 499NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti — $ 599NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 — $ 699NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti — $ 799NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 — $ 1,499NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 — $ 200NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 — $ 329NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti — $ 399NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 — $ 499NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 — $ 699NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti — $ 799NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 — $ 1,499NVIDIA TITAN RTX — $ 2,499NVIDIA TITAN V — $ 2,999NVIDIA TITAN Xp — $ 1,199

Change CPU To
Select. .AMD Athlon 5000 Dual-Core — $ 100AMD Athlon 5200 Dual-Core — $ 30AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+ — $ 130AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4400+ — $ 60AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4600+ — $ 360AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4800+ — $ 460AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+ — $ 331.5AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+ — $ 53.1AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5400+ — $ 53AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5600+ — $ 150AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5800+ — $ 25AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+ — $ 46AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6400+ — $ 260AMD Athlon 7550 Dual-Core — $ 60AMD Athlon 7750 Dual-Core — $ 148.7AMD Athlon 7850 Dual-Core — $ 209.7AMD Athlon Dual Core 5000B — $ 95AMD Athlon II X2 215 — $ 12AMD Athlon II X2 220 — $ 32.2AMD Athlon II X2 240 — $ 35AMD Athlon II X2 245 — $ 35AMD Athlon II X2 250 — $ 39AMD Athlon II X2 255 — $ 65.2AMD Athlon II X2 260 — $ 20AMD Athlon II X2 265 — $ 82.9AMD Athlon II X2 270 — $ 24AMD Athlon II X2 B22 — $ 36AMD Athlon II X2 B24 — $ 40AMD Athlon II X2 B28 — $ 49.1AMD Athlon II X3 425 — $ 104. 2AMD Athlon II X3 435 — $ 50AMD Athlon II X3 440 — $ 47AMD Athlon II X3 445 — $ 91AMD Athlon II X3 450 — $ 40AMD Athlon II X3 455 — $ 116.9AMD Athlon II X3 460 — $ 50AMD Athlon II X4 620 — $ 60AMD Athlon II X4 630 — $ 43AMD Athlon II X4 631 Quad-Core — $ 80AMD Athlon II X4 635 — $ 70AMD Athlon II X4 640 — $ 80AMD Athlon II X4 641 Quad-Core — $ 91.5AMD Athlon II X4 645 — $ 50AMD Athlon X4 740 Quad Core — $ 277AMD Athlon X4 760K Quad Core — $ 46AMD Athlon X4 840 — $ 78.7AMD Athlon X4 845 — $ 50AMD Athlon X4 860K — $ 64AMD Athlon X4 870K — $ 80AMD Athlon X4 880K — $ 90AMD Athlon X4 950 — $ 60AMD E2-3200 APU — $ 8AMD FX-4100 Quad-Core — $ 130AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core — $ 76AMD FX-4170 Quad-Core — $ 100AMD FX-4200 Quad-Core — $ 228.2AMD FX-4300 Quad-Core — $ 53.4AMD FX-4350 Quad-Core — $ 130AMD FX-6200 Six-Core — $ 340AMD FX-6300 Six-Core — $ 59AMD FX-6350 Six-Core — $ 130AMD FX-8120 Eight-Core — $ 100AMD FX-8150 Eight-Core — $ 383.5AMD FX-8300 Eight-Core — $ 80.6AMD FX-8320 Eight-Core — $ 79.5AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core — $ 98. 9AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core — $ 80AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core — $ 135AMD FX-8370E Eight-Core — $ 180AMD FX-9370 Eight-Core — $ 178.9AMD FX-9590 Eight-Core — $ 122AMD Phenom 8250e Triple-Core — $ 47AMD Phenom 8450 Triple-Core — $ 30AMD Phenom 8600 Triple-Core — $ 53AMD Phenom 8600B Triple-Core — $ 53AMD Phenom 8650 Triple-Core — $ 50AMD Phenom 9100e Quad-Core — $ 40AMD Phenom 9150e Quad-Core — $ 40AMD Phenom 9350e Quad-Core — $ 3382.1AMD Phenom 9450e Quad-Core — $ 105AMD Phenom 9500 Quad-Core — $ 60AMD Phenom 9550 Quad-Core — $ 40AMD Phenom 9600 Quad-Core — $ 50AMD Phenom 9600B Quad-Core — $ 147.2AMD Phenom 9650 Quad-Core — $ 55AMD Phenom 9750 Quad-Core — $ 60AMD Phenom 9850 Quad-Core — $ 50AMD Phenom 9950 Quad-Core — $ 180AMD Phenom II X2 545 — $ 44AMD Phenom II X2 550 — $ 50AMD Phenom II X2 555 — $ 142.1AMD Phenom II X2 565 — $ 30AMD Phenom II X2 B55 — $ 48AMD Phenom II X3 705e — $ 152.3AMD Phenom II X3 710 — $ 84.5AMD Phenom II X3 720 — $ 70AMD Phenom II X3 B73 — $ 75AMD Phenom II X4 805 — $ 174AMD Phenom II X4 810 — $ 116AMD Phenom II X4 820 — $ 75AMD Phenom II X4 840 — $ 90AMD Phenom II X4 905e — $ 212. 4AMD Phenom II X4 910 — $ 100AMD Phenom II X4 910e — $ 157AMD Phenom II X4 920 — $ 67AMD Phenom II X4 925 — $ 160AMD Phenom II X4 940 — $ 120AMD Phenom II X4 945 — $ 50AMD Phenom II X4 955 — $ 130.2AMD Phenom II X4 960T — $ 135AMD Phenom II X4 965 — $ 59.5AMD Phenom II X4 B95 — $ 73AMD Phenom II X4 B97 — $ 90AMD Phenom II X6 1035T — $ 189AMD Phenom II X6 1045T — $ 175AMD Phenom II X6 1055T — $ 185AMD Phenom II X6 1075T — $ 260AMD Phenom II X6 1090T — $ 396.1AMD Phenom II X6 1100T — $ 200AMD Phenom X3 8550 — $ 170AMD Ryzen 3 1200 — $ 95AMD Ryzen 3 1300X — $ 125AMD Ryzen 3 2200G — $ 98AMD Ryzen 3 3100 — $ 90AMD Ryzen 3 3200G — $ 99AMD Ryzen 3 3300X — $ 120AMD Ryzen 5 1400 — $ 134AMD Ryzen 5 1500X — $ 144.9AMD Ryzen 5 1600 — $ 155AMD Ryzen 5 1600X — $ 178.4AMD Ryzen 5 2400G — $ 159AMD Ryzen 5 2600 — $ 150AMD Ryzen 5 2600X — $ 210AMD Ryzen 5 3400G — $ 150AMD Ryzen 5 3500 — $ 148AMD Ryzen 5 3500X — $ 160.5AMD Ryzen 5 3600 — $ 199AMD Ryzen 5 3600X — $ 249AMD Ryzen 5 5500 — $ 160AMD Ryzen 5 5600X — $ 299AMD Ryzen 7 1700 — $ 190AMD Ryzen 7 1700X — $ 200AMD Ryzen 7 1800X — $ 250AMD Ryzen 7 2700 — $ 249. 2AMD Ryzen 7 2700X — $ 305AMD Ryzen 7 3700X — $ 330AMD Ryzen 7 3800X — $ 399AMD Ryzen 7 5700X — $ 300AMD Ryzen 7 5800X — $ 399AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D — $ 450AMD Ryzen 9 3900X — $ 499AMD Ryzen 9 3950X — $ 750AMD Ryzen 9 5900X — $ 499AMD Ryzen 9 5950X — $ 710AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X — $ 350AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X — $ 420AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X — $ 680AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X — $ 900AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX — $ 1720Intel Core i3-10100 — $ 122Intel Core i3-10300 — $ 143Intel Core i3-11100 — $ 122Intel Core i3-11300 — $ 143Intel Core i3-12100 — $ 122Intel Core i3-12300 — $ 143Intel Core i3-2100 @ 3.10GHz — $ 60Intel Core i3-2102 @ 3.10GHz — $ 58Intel Core i3-2105 @ 3.10GHz — $ 80Intel Core i3-2120 @ 3.30GHz — $ 30Intel Core i3-2125 @ 3.30GHz — $ 199Intel Core i3-2130 @ 3.40GHz — $ 70Intel Core i3-3210 @ 3.20GHz — $ 100Intel Core i3-3220 @ 3.30GHz — $ 34.9Intel Core i3-3225 @ 3.30GHz — $ 100Intel Core i3-3240 @ 3.40GHz — $ 46Intel Core i3-3245 @ 3.40GHz — $ 80Intel Core i3-3250 @ 3. 50GHz — $ 95Intel Core i3-4130 @ 3.40GHz — $ 140Intel Core i3-4150 @ 3.50GHz — $ 260Intel Core i3-4160 @ 3.60GHz — $ 140Intel Core i3-4170 @ 3.70GHz — $ 150Intel Core i3-4330 @ 3.50GHz — $ 180Intel Core i3-4340 @ 3.60GHz — $ 170Intel Core i3-4350 @ 3.60GHz — $ 170Intel Core i3-4360 @ 3.70GHz — $ 280Intel Core i3-4370 @ 3.80GHz — $ 450Intel Core i3-530 @ 2.93GHz — $ 20Intel Core i3-540 @ 3.07GHz — $ 21Intel Core i3-550 @ 3.20GHz — $ 180Intel Core i3-560 @ 3.33GHz — $ 30Intel Core i3-6098P @ 3.60GHz — $ 133.7Intel Core i3-6100 @ 3.70GHz — $ 166.1Intel Core i3-6300 @ 3.80GHz — $ 143Intel Core i3-6320 @ 3.90GHz — $ 160Intel Core i3-7100 @ 3.90GHz — $ 170Intel Core i3-7300 @ 4.00GHz — $ 210Intel Core i3-7320 @ 4.10GHz — $ 174.8Intel Core i3-7350K @ 4.20GHz — $ 230Intel Core i3-8100 @ 3.60GHz — $ 130Intel Core i3-8300 @ 3.70GHz — $ 179.4Intel Core i3-8350K @ 4.00GHz — $ 184Intel Core i3-9100 @ 3.60GHz — $ 170Intel Core i3-9100F @ 3.60GHz — $ 105Intel Core i3-9320 @ 3.70GHz — $ 162Intel Core i3-9350KF @ 4. 00GHz — $ 224Intel Core i5 750S @ 2.40GHz — $ 100Intel Core i5-10400 — $ 182Intel Core i5-10600K — $ 236.8Intel Core i5-11400 — $ 182Intel Core i5-11600K — $ 262Intel Core i5-12400 — $ 143Intel Core i5-12600K — $ 290Intel Core i5-2300 @ 2.80GHz — $ 80Intel Core i5-2310 @ 2.90GHz — $ 80Intel Core i5-2320 @ 3.00GHz — $ 195.3Intel Core i5-2380P @ 3.10GHz — $ 90Intel Core i5-2400 @ 3.10GHz — $ 84Intel Core i5-2400S @ 2.50GHz — $ 65.7Intel Core i5-2405S @ 2.50GHz — $ 164.4Intel Core i5-2450P @ 3.20GHz — $ 90Intel Core i5-2500 @ 3.30GHz — $ 105Intel Core i5-2500K @ 3.30GHz — $ 124Intel Core i5-2500S @ 2.70GHz — $ 75Intel Core i5-2550K @ 3.40GHz — $ 130Intel Core i5-3330 @ 3.00GHz — $ 100Intel Core i5-3330S @ 2.70GHz — $ 95Intel Core i5-3340 @ 3.10GHz — $ 262Intel Core i5-3340S @ 2.80GHz — $ 150Intel Core i5-3350P @ 3.10GHz — $ 170Intel Core i5-3450 @ 3.10GHz — $ 128Intel Core i5-3450S @ 2.80GHz — $ 100Intel Core i5-3470 @ 3.20GHz — $ 125Intel Core i5-3470S @ 2.90GHz — $ 140.1Intel Core i5-3475S @ 2. 90GHz — $ 143.5Intel Core i5-3550 @ 3.30GHz — $ 330Intel Core i5-3550S @ 3.00GHz — $ 341Intel Core i5-3570 @ 3.40GHz — $ 140Intel Core i5-3570K @ 3.40GHz — $ 144Intel Core i5-3570S @ 3.10GHz — $ 285Intel Core i5-4430 @ 3.00GHz — $ 180Intel Core i5-4430S @ 2.70GHz — $ 160Intel Core i5-4440 @ 3.10GHz — $ 170Intel Core i5-4440S @ 2.80GHz — $ 463Intel Core i5-4460 @ 3.20GHz — $ 170Intel Core i5-4460S @ 2.90GHz — $ 660Intel Core i5-4570 @ 3.20GHz — $ 175Intel Core i5-4570S @ 2.90GHz — $ 221.6Intel Core i5-4590 @ 3.30GHz — $ 185Intel Core i5-4590S @ 3.00GHz — $ 198Intel Core i5-4670 @ 3.40GHz — $ 188Intel Core i5-4670K @ 3.40GHz — $ 250Intel Core i5-4670R @ 3.00GHz — $ 276Intel Core i5-4690 @ 3.50GHz — $ 200Intel Core i5-4690K @ 3.50GHz — $ 200Intel Core i5-4690S @ 3.20GHz — $ 269.9Intel Core i5-5675C @ 3.10GHz — $ 400Intel Core i5-6400 @ 2.70GHz — $ 200Intel Core i5-6402P @ 2.80GHz — $ 190Intel Core i5-650 @ 3.20GHz — $ 100Intel Core i5-6500 @ 3.20GHz — $ 234.4Intel Core i5-655K @ 3.20GHz — $ 60Intel Core i5-660 @ 3. 33GHz — $ 49Intel Core i5-6600 @ 3.30GHz — $ 220Intel Core i5-6600K @ 3.50GHz — $ 288.9Intel Core i5-661 @ 3.33GHz — $ 100Intel Core i5-670 @ 3.47GHz — $ 90Intel Core i5-680 @ 3.60GHz — $ 90Intel Core i5-7400 @ 3.00GHz — $ 213.5Intel Core i5-750 @ 2.67GHz — $ 160.5Intel Core i5-7500 @ 3.40GHz — $ 210Intel Core i5-760 @ 2.80GHz — $ 100Intel Core i5-7600 @ 3.50GHz — $ 240Intel Core i5-7600K @ 3.80GHz — $ 251Intel Core i5-7640X @ 4.00GHz — $ 250Intel Core i5-8400 @ 2.80GHz — $ 200Intel Core i5-8500 @ 3.00GHz — $ 239Intel Core i5-8600 @ 3.10GHz — $ 244.5Intel Core i5-8600K @ 3.60GHz — $ 377.7Intel Core i5-9400 @ 2.90GHz — $ 170Intel Core i5-9400F @ 2.90GHz — $ 170Intel Core i5-9600K @ 3.70GHz — $ 280Intel Core i5-9600KF @ 3.70GHz — $ 215Intel Core i7-10700K — $ 409.1Intel Core i7-11700K — $ 410Intel Core i7-12700K — $ 470Intel Core i7-2600 @ 3.40GHz — $ 150Intel Core i7-2600K @ 3.40GHz — $ 198Intel Core i7-2600S @ 2.80GHz — $ 200Intel Core i7-2700K @ 3.50GHz — $ 200Intel Core i7-3770 @ 3.40GHz — $ 179Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3. 50GHz — $ 249Intel Core i7-3770S @ 3.10GHz — $ 200Intel Core i7-3820 @ 3.60GHz — $ 200Intel Core i7-3930K @ 3.20GHz — $ 399Intel Core i7-3960X @ 3.30GHz — $ 800Intel Core i7-3970X @ 3.50GHz — $ 954Intel Core i7-4770 @ 3.40GHz — $ 240Intel Core i7-4770K @ 3.50GHz — $ 285Intel Core i7-4770S @ 3.10GHz — $ 250Intel Core i7-4771 @ 3.50GHz — $ 300Intel Core i7-4790 @ 3.60GHz — $ 279Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4.00GHz — $ 307Intel Core i7-4790S @ 3.20GHz — $ 342.6Intel Core i7-4820K @ 3.70GHz — $ 500Intel Core i7-4930K @ 3.40GHz — $ 399Intel Core i7-4960X @ 3.60GHz — $ 770Intel Core i7-5775C @ 3.30GHz — $ 450Intel Core i7-5820K @ 3.30GHz — $ 300Intel Core i7-5930K @ 3.50GHz — $ 499Intel Core i7-5960X @ 3.00GHz — $ 770Intel Core i7-6700 @ 3.40GHz — $ 433.7Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.00GHz — $ 335Intel Core i7-6800K @ 3.40GHz — $ 420Intel Core i7-6850K @ 3.60GHz — $ 550Intel Core i7-6900K @ 3.20GHz — $ 1200Intel Core i7-6950X @ 3.00GHz — $ 1576Intel Core i7-7700 @ 3.60GHz — $ 325.1Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4. 20GHz — $ 355Intel Core i7-7740X @ 4.30GHz — $ 349Intel Core i7-7800X @ 3.50GHz — $ 370Intel Core i7-7820X @ 3.60GHz — $ 930Intel Core i7-8086K @ 4.00GHz — $ 553Intel Core i7-860 @ 2.80GHz — $ 290Intel Core i7-860S @ 2.53GHz — $ 200Intel Core i7-870 @ 2.93GHz — $ 310Intel Core i7-8700 @ 3.20GHz — $ 454.5Intel Core i7-8700K @ 3.70GHz — $ 369.9Intel Core i7-875K @ 2.93GHz — $ 200Intel Core i7-880 @ 3.07GHz — $ 583Intel Core i7-920 @ 2.67GHz — $ 174Intel Core i7-930 @ 2.80GHz — $ 60Intel Core i7-940 @ 2.93GHz — $ 70.7Intel Core i7-950 @ 3.07GHz — $ 245Intel Core i7-960 @ 3.20GHz — $ 100Intel Core i7-965 @ 3.20GHz — $ 140Intel Core i7-970 @ 3.20GHz — $ 150Intel Core i7-9700 @ 3.00GHz — $ 330Intel Core i7-9700F @ 3.00GHz — $ 368Intel Core i7-9700K @ 3.60GHz — $ 410Intel Core i7-975 @ 3.33GHz — $ 180Intel Core i7-980 @ 3.33GHz — $ 200Intel Core i7-980X @ 3.33GHz — $ 220Intel Core i7-990X @ 3.47GHz — $ 350Intel Core i9-10900K — $ 590Intel Core i9-11900K — $ 488Intel Core i9-12900K — $ 590Intel Core i9-7900X @ 3. 30GHz — $ 1380Intel Core i9-7920X @ 2.90GHz — $ 1096.7Intel Core i9-7940X @ 3.10GHz — $ 1192.1Intel Core i9-7960X @ 2.80GHz — $ 2000Intel Core i9-7980XE @ 2.60GHz — $ 2005.5Intel Core i9-9900 @ 3.10GHz — $ 440Intel Core i9-9900K @ 3.60GHz — $ 835Intel Core2 Duo E4300 @ 1.80GHz — $ 158Intel Core2 Duo E4400 @ 2.00GHz — $ 9Intel Core2 Duo E4500 @ 2.20GHz — $ 40Intel Core2 Duo E4600 @ 2.40GHz — $ 158Intel Core2 Duo E4700 @ 2.60GHz — $ 100Intel Core2 Duo E6300 @ 1.86GHz — $ 13Intel Core2 Duo E6320 @ 1.86GHz — $ 50Intel Core2 Duo E6400 @ 2.13GHz — $ 20Intel Core2 Duo E6420 @ 2.13GHz — $ 50Intel Core2 Duo E6550 @ 2.33GHz — $ 15Intel Core2 Duo E6600 @ 2.40GHz — $ 15Intel Core2 Duo E6700 @ 2.66GHz — $ 30Intel Core2 Duo E6750 @ 2.66GHz — $ 13Intel Core2 Duo E6850 @ 3.00GHz — $ 50Intel Core2 Duo E7200 @ 2.53GHz — $ 75Intel Core2 Duo E7300 @ 2.66GHz — $ 20Intel Core2 Duo E7400 @ 2.80GHz — $ 29Intel Core2 Duo E7500 @ 2.93GHz — $ 15Intel Core2 Duo E7600 @ 3.06GHz — $ 120Intel Core2 Duo E8200 @ 2.66GHz — $ 50Intel Core2 Duo E8300 @ 2. 83GHz — $ 20Intel Core2 Duo E8400 @ 3.00GHz — $ 9.8Intel Core2 Duo E8500 @ 3.16GHz — $ 40Intel Core2 Duo E8600 @ 3.33GHz — $ 50Intel Core2 Extreme Q6800 @ 2.93GHz — $ 1125Intel Core2 Extreme Q6850 @ 3.00GHz — $ 1496Intel Core2 Extreme X6800 @ 2.93GHz — $ 263.6Intel Core2 Extreme X9650 @ 3.00GHz — $ 909Intel Core2 Extreme X9770 @ 3.20GHz — $ 1609Intel Core2 Extreme X9775 @ 3.20GHz — $ 1806Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 @ 2.40GHz — $ 40Intel Core2 Quad Q6700 @ 2.66GHz — $ 45Intel Core2 Quad Q8200 @ 2.33GHz — $ 23Intel Core2 Quad Q8300 @ 2.50GHz — $ 50Intel Core2 Quad Q8400 @ 2.66GHz — $ 99.5Intel Core2 Quad Q9300 @ 2.50GHz — $ 50Intel Core2 Quad Q9400 @ 2.66GHz — $ 34Intel Core2 Quad Q9450 @ 2.66GHz — $ 335Intel Core2 Quad Q9500 @ 2.83GHz — $ 35Intel Core2 Quad Q9505 @ 2.83GHz — $ 190Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 @ 2.83GHz — $ 49Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 @ 3.00GHz — $ 69.8Intel Pentium G2010 @ 2.80GHz — $ 34.9Intel Pentium G2020 @ 2.90GHz — $ 32.9Intel Pentium G2030 @ 3.00GHz — $ 41Intel Pentium G2120 @ 3. 10GHz — $ 46Intel Pentium G2130 @ 3.20GHz — $ 50Intel Pentium G2140 @ 3.30GHz — $ 50Intel Pentium G3220 @ 3.00GHz — $ 120Intel Pentium G3240 @ 3.10GHz — $ 80Intel Pentium G3250 @ 3.20GHz — $ 110Intel Pentium G3258 @ 3.20GHz — $ 178.3Intel Pentium G3260 @ 3.30GHz — $ 105Intel Pentium G3420 @ 3.20GHz — $ 110Intel Pentium G3430 @ 3.30GHz — $ 90Intel Pentium G3440 @ 3.30GHz — $ 159.9Intel Pentium G3450 @ 3.40GHz — $ 100Intel Pentium G3460 @ 3.50GHz — $ 288.2Intel Pentium G3470 @ 3.60GHz — $ 104.3Intel Pentium G4400 @ 3.30GHz — $ 80Intel Pentium G4500 @ 3.50GHz — $ 85.3Intel Pentium G4520 @ 3.60GHz — $ 110.9Intel Pentium G4560 @ 3.50GHz — $ 103.1Intel Pentium G4600 @ 3.60GHz — $ 100Intel Pentium G4620 @ 3.70GHz — $ 105.9Intel Pentium G640 @ 2.80GHz — $ 25Intel Pentium G645 @ 2.90GHz — $ 95Intel Pentium G840 @ 2.80GHz — $ 35Intel Pentium G850 @ 2.90GHz — $ 30Intel Pentium G860 @ 3.00GHz — $ 30Intel Pentium G870 @ 3.10GHz — $ 97Intel Pentium Gold G5400 @ 3.70GHz — $ 123.9Intel Pentium Gold G5500 @ 3. 80GHz — $ 100.3Intel Pentium Gold G5600 @ 3.90GHz — $ 100.9

Change Variant To
Select..ASUS R7 265 DirectCU IIClub 3D R7 265 royalQueenGIGABYTE R7 265 WindForce 2X OCMSI R7 265MSI R7 265 OCPCYES R7 265 HammerXPowerColor TurboDuo R7 265 OCSapphire Dual-X R7 265VTX3D R7 265 X-EditionXFX R7 265 1 GBXFX R7 265 1 GBXFX R7 265 2 GBXFX R7 265 2 GB

Desired Quality Setting
Select..Ultra Quality — MSAA, HBAO, and advanced shadowsHigh Quality — No MSAA, HBAO, or advanced shadowsMedium QualityLow Quality

AMD Radeon R7 265 Review feat. XFX

Written by

Matthew Lambert

May 8, 2014 | 09:08

Tags: #mantle #radeon

Companies: #amd

1 — AMD Radeon R7 265 Review feat. XFX2 — AMD Radeon R7 265 Review — Test Setup3 — AMD Radeon R7 265 Review — Battlefield 4 Performance4 — AMD Radeon R7 265 Review — BioShock Infinite Performance5 — AMD Radeon R7 265 Review — Crysis 3 Performance6 — AMD Radeon R7 265 Review — Skyrim Performance7 — AMD Radeon R7 265 Review — Unigine Valley 1. 0 Benchmark8 — AMD Radeon R7 265 Review — Power and Thermals9 — AMD Radeon R7 265 Review — Overclocking10 — AMD Radeon R7 265 Review — Performance Analysis and Conclusion

Using MSI Afterburner, we ramped up the card’s power limit by 20 percent, the maximum allowed. Voltage increases were not an option, but even so we were quickly able to reach an overclock of 1,050MHz – the highest frequency we were allowed to use. This is already a not-too-shabby 14 percent increase, but after unlocking Afterburner’s limits we were amazed to find that we could add a further 100MHz before the card started acting like it had had one too many. This final frequency of 1,150MHz is equal to a whopping 24 percent increase in raw speed.

The memory was also game for a bit of tweaking, and we managed a final frequency here of 1.55GHz (6.2GHz effective), which is akin to an 11 percent increase.

Click to enlarge — The card’s two memory power phases and four GPU ones

Revisiting the GTX 750 Ti

When we first reviewed the GTX 750 Ti, we managed to add 135MHz to its core clock speed, which at the time was the most that the drivers would allow. This was a common experience amongst reviewers, so Nvidia raised the amount of overclocking headroom on the card in its next WHQL driver, 335.23. As such, given how closely priced the GTX 750 Ti is to the R7 265, we decided to revisit Nvidia’s card with the newer drivers. While we didn’t notice any significant change in stock performance, the main reason for our doing so was to see if we could squeeze any extra juice from it.

In the end, we were able to add 185MHz to the base clock, taking it to 1,205MHz. This is 50MHz more than before and a tasty 18 percent overclock overall. At this speed, the card’s boost clock was a whopping 1,270MHz. We were unable to improve our memory overclock, which we left at 1.65GHz (6.6GHz), a 22 percent gain.

We’ve included overclocked results for both the GTX 750 Ti and the R7 265 in the charts below.

• Nvidia GeForce GTX 760 2GB
• AMD Radeon R9 270X 2GB
• XFX Radeon R7 265 Core Edition 2GB (OC)
• AMD Radeon R9 270 2GB
• Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 2GB
• XFX Radeon R7 265 Core Edition 2GB
• Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB (OC)
• Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB
• AMD Radeon R7 260X 2GB

• • 38

  • 47

• • 36

  • 42

• • 34

  • 41

• • 32

  • 38

• • 30

  • 37

• • 29

  • 34

• • 27

  • 35

• • 23

  • 30

• • 22

  • 27

10

20

30

40

50

Frames Per Second

• Minimum

• Average

• Nvidia GeForce GTX 760 2GB
• AMD Radeon R9 270X 2GB
• XFX Radeon R7 265 Core Edition 2GB (OC)
• Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 2GB
• AMD Radeon R9 270 2GB
• Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB (OC)
• XFX Radeon R7 265 Core Edition 2GB
• Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB
• AMD Radeon R7 260X 2GB

• • 36

  • 45

• • 31

  • 37

• • 30

  • 36

• • 29

  • 35

• • 28

  • 34

• • 26

  • 32

• • 25

  • 31

• • 23

  • 27

• • 21

  • 25

10

20

30

40

50

Frames Per Second

• Minimum

• Average

• AMD Radeon R9 270X 2GB
• Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 2GB
• XFX Radeon R7 265 Core Edition 2GB (OC)
• AMD Radeon R9 270 2GB
• Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB (OC)
• Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB
• XFX Radeon R7 265 Core Edition 2GB
• AMD Radeon R7 260X 2GB

• • 1284

• • 1263

• • 1197

• • 1148

• • 1113

• • 981

• • 967

• • 846

250

500

750

1000

1250

1500

Score (higher is beter)

• Score

1 — AMD Radeon R7 265 Review feat. XFX2 — AMD Radeon R7 265 Review — Test Setup3 — AMD Radeon R7 265 Review — Battlefield 4 Performance4 — AMD Radeon R7 265 Review — BioShock Infinite Performance5 — AMD Radeon R7 265 Review — Crysis 3 Performance6 — AMD Radeon R7 265 Review — Skyrim Performance7 — AMD Radeon R7 265 Review — Unigine Valley 1.0 Benchmark8 — AMD Radeon R7 265 Review — Power and Thermals9 — AMD Radeon R7 265 Review — Overclocking10 — AMD Radeon R7 265 Review — Performance Analysis and Conclusion

Review and testing of ASUS R7265-DC2-2GD5 video card based on AMD Radeon R7 265 GECID.com. Page 1

::>Video cards
>2014
> ASUS R7265-DC2-2GD5

05/25/2014

Page 1
Page 2
One page

In February 2014, a new graphics card from the AMD Volcanic Islands family, the AMD Radeon R7 265, was officially introduced. It is designed to take a place between the AMD Radeon R7 260X and AMD Radeon R9270 and compete for the attention of buyers with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti. Note that the recommended price of the novelty (and the competitor from NVIDIA) with reference parameters is declared at $150.

In fact, the AMD Radeon R7 265 is nothing more than the well-known AMD Radeon HD 7850 with a graphics core overclocked to 925 MHz and an increased TDP level (from 130 to 150 W). Also, the novelty boasts support for the AMD Mantle API.

For more clarity, let’s compare the technical characteristics of current mid-range AMD video cards:

	AMD Radeon R7 265	AMD Radeon R7 260X	AMD Radeon R7 260	AMD Radeon R7 250
Codename	Curacao	Bonaire XTX	Bonaire PRO	Oland XT
Number of stream processors	1024	896	768	384
Texture blocks	64	56	48	24
ROPs	32	16	16	8
GPU frequency, MHz	to 925	1100	1000	1050
Video memory type and frequency, MHz	GDDR5 1400	GDDR5 1625	GDDR5 1500	GDDR3 / GDDR5 900 / 1125
Video memory interface, bit	256	128	128	128

Separately, we note that the base frequency of the graphics core is 900 MHz, and it can dynamically accelerate up to 925 MHz in AMD PowerTune Boost mode.

And now let’s move on to a direct review of the video card ASUS Radeon R7 265 DirectCU II , on the example of which we will study all the features of the AMD Radeon R7 265.

Model

ASUS Radeon R7 265 DirectCU II

(ASUS R7265-DC2-2GD5)

Graphics core

AMD Radeon R7 265 (Curacao)

Number of universal shader processors

1024

Supported APIs and technologies

DirectX 11.2, OpenGL 4.3, AMD Mantle, AMD Eyefinity, AMD App Acceleration, AMD HD3D, AMD CrossFireX, AMD PowerPlay, AMD PowerTune, AMD ZeroCore

GPU base / dynamic frequency, MHz

900 / 925

Memory frequency (effective), MHz

1400 (5600)

Memory size, GB

2

Memory type

GDDR5

Memory bus width, bit

256

Memory bandwidth, GB/s

179. 2

Tire type

PCI Express 3.0 x16

Maximum resolution

Digital — up to 4096 x 2160

Analog — up to 2048 x 1536

Image output interfaces

1 x DVI-I

1 x DVI-D

1 x HDMI

1 x DisplayPort

Support for HDCP and HD video decoding

Yes

Minimum power supply unit, W

500

Additional PCIe power connectors

1 x 6-pin

Dimensions from the official website (according to measurements in our test laboratory), mm

233.6 x 124.4 (240 x 127)

Drivers

Latest drivers can be downloaded from the ASUS website or the GPU manufacturer’s website

Manufacturer website

ASUS

All prices for Asus+R7265-DC2-2GD5

The tested modification of AMD Radeon R7 265 differs from the reference version by the original ASUS DirectCU II cooling system and high-quality hardware components. As for the printed circuit board and power subsystem, in this case, AMD did not create a «reference» sample, but allowed its partners to use their own developments in this area.

Packing and contents

The ASUS R7265-DC2-2GD5 video card comes in a traditional ASUS box made of thick cardboard and decorated with high-quality printing in the corporate style. In addition to the name of the manufacturer and model, on its front side, we note the mention of the amount and type of video memory used, as well as the presence of the GPU Tweak utility in the package. The main advantages of the novelty are: the proprietary DirectCU II cooling system and an improved element base, made according to the Super Alloy Power concept. It includes:

• solid capacitors with up to 50,000 hours longer life and 20% more high temperature endurance;
• ferrite core chokes.

The above benefits provide 15% more performance, 35°C lower power cell temperatures, and 2. 5x longer graphics card life.

The reverse side of the box is traditionally reserved for a more detailed description of the benefits indicated on the front side. Also here is a schematic representation of the interface panel.

The list of system requirements for the computer where you plan to install the video card is located on one of the sides of the box. Based on the recommendations, the power supply in such a system must have a power of at least 500 W and deliver at least 24 A through the + 12V power line. As for the additional power connectors, the ASUS Radeon R7 265 DirectCU II requires a single 6-pin PCIe cable.

In addition to the standard documentation and software CD, we found a DVI to D-Sub adapter and an AMD CrossFireX bridge bundled with the graphics adapter, which can be safely called an excellent set for an affordable video card.

To output an image on the tested novelty, a reference set of interfaces is provided:

• 1 x DVI-I;
• 1 x DVI-D;
• 1 x HDMI;
• 1 x DisplayPort.

The following resolutions are supported:

• digital — up to 4096 x 2160;
• analog — up to 2048 x 1536.

Appearance and element base

The novelty is made on a relatively compact black printed circuit board with a matte finish. As you can see, the main principles for the location of key elements are quite standard: the graphics core, slightly offset from the center of the textolite, is surrounded by video memory chips, while the elements of the power subsystem are located on both sides.

The tested video card is powered by an eight-phase scheme (six phases for the GPU and one phase for the PLL and memory chips). The element base is recruited in accordance with the Super Alloy Power concept and includes only high-quality components: solid capacitors and ferrite core chokes, which improves the stability and reliability of the graphics adapter, as well as extending its service life.

The graphics core power subsystem is implemented on the DIGI + VRM ASP1215AH digital PWM controller, information about which, unfortunately, is not widely available.

In addition to the PCI Express 3.0 x16 slot, ASUS R7265-DC2-2GD5 adapter is powered through one additional connector located on the right side of the video card. As recommended by AMD, the 6-pin option is used. By tradition, when testing video cards from ASUS, once again we note the competent work of design engineers from the Taiwanese manufacturer, who took care of the convenience of connecting and disconnecting the power cable.

To implement AMD CrossFireX technology on ASUS R7265-DC2-2GD5, one connector is used to connect the corresponding bridge, which allows you to combine two video accelerators for joint calculation of graphic effects.

The reverse side of the printed circuit board is notable except for the fixing screws of the cooling system, one of which is covered with a warranty sticker, which means that if you remove the cooler yourself, you, unfortunately, will lose the warranty.

The heroine of our review is based on the AMD Curacao graphics chip manufactured using the 28-nm process technology. It consists of 1024 universal shader pipelines, 32 rasterization units and 64 texture units. Since the ASUS Radeon R7 265 DirectCU II comes with a reference frequency formula, the graphics core is able to dynamically accelerate up to the recommended 925 MHz.

The memory of the novelty, with a total capacity of 2 GB, is assembled using 8 ELPIDA W2032BBBG-6A-F chips with a capacity of 256 MB each, which operate at a frequency recommended by AMD of 1400 MHz (effective value — 5600 MHz). Data exchange between the graphics core and memory is carried out through a 256-bit bus, which is capable of passing 179.2 GB of information per second.

Cooling system

The video accelerator with DirectCU II proprietary cooling system installed takes up two expansion slots and has a total length of 240 mm (according to measurements in our test lab).

The cooler consists of a relatively small heatsink with 37 aluminum fins and two fans with an impeller diameter of 74 mm, mounted on a plastic casing that covers the entire structure from above.

Two copper heatpipes 8 mm in diameter are used to evenly distribute heat over the entire area of ​​the radiator. Note that the radiator fins and heat pipes are covered with a layer of nickel, which is designed to reduce the drop in CO efficiency during operation, caused by the oxidation of metals. As standard for DirectCU II coolers, heat pipes directly contact the surface of the GPU through a small layer of thermal paste.

As you can see, the main cooling system, using a special thermal interface, is in direct contact with two of the eight memory chips, while the remaining six and the power elements of the power stabilization module do not have additional cooling.

The heatpipes are tightly mounted on the heatsink fins without the use of solder.

During automatic fan speed control, in maximum load mode, the graphics core heated up to 69degrees, and the cooler, judging by the monitoring readings, worked at 56% of its maximum capacity. The noise level in this mode of operation can be subjectively described as quiet.

After forcibly increasing the fan speed to the maximum level, the GPU temperature dropped to 62 degrees. The noise level generated can be described as «below average, comfortable for extended use». By tradition, we remind you that such a mode of operation in everyday use is unlikely, since the rotational speed of the blades was forced to the maximum level, solely to measure the «safety margin» of CO.

When there is no load, the graphics core and memory frequencies are automatically reduced to reduce their power consumption and heat dissipation. In this mode, the GPU temperature does not exceed 36 degrees, and the noise level is very quiet.

Testing

specs and benchmarks in 9 games and 1 benchmark

AMD started selling the Radeon R7 265 on February 13, 2014 at a suggested price of $149. This is a desktop video card based on the GCN 1.0 architecture with a 28 nm process technology. It has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory with a frequency of 1400 MHz, a 256-bit bus, which provides a bandwidth of 56 Gb / s.

Card occupies 2 slots, connected via PCIe 3.0 x16 interface. The length of the reference version is 210 mm. The card requires one 6-pin auxiliary power cable, the declared maximum power consumption is 150 watts.

Specifications

GPU

GPU option

Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)

Architecture

GCN 1.0

Manufacturer

TSMC

Process

28 nm

Number of transistors

2800 million

Crystal area

212 mm²

Graphic card

Issue date

February 13, 2014

Generation

Volcanic Islands (R7 200)

Predecessor

Sea Islands

Descendant

Pirate Islands

Launch price

$149

Market price

$149

Data bus interface

PCIe 3. 0 x16

Frequencies

Base frequency

900 MHz

Boost frequency

925 MHz

Memory frequency

1400 MHz

Memory

Memory capacity

2 GB

Memory type

GDDR5

Memory bus

256 bit

Memory speed

56 Gb/s

Memory bandwidth

179.2 GB/s

Render configuration

Shader units

1024

Compute modules

16

Texture blocks

64

Screen blocks

32

L1 cache

16 KB

L2 cache

512 KB

Rated output

Pixel fill rate

29. 60 GP/s

Texture Fill Rate

59.20 GT/s

Performance FP32

1.894 Tflops

Performance FP64

118.4 GFlops

Graphic options

DirectX

12 (11_1)

OpenGL

4.6

OpenCL

1.2

Vulcan

1.2

Shader model

5.1

Video card design

Occupied slots

2

Length

210 mm

Heat Sink Requirements

150 W

Recommended PSU power

450 W

Outlets

2x DVI 1x HDMI 1x DisplayPort

Power supply

1x 6-pin

Board number

C630

Maximum temperature

61 °C

Maximum noise

43. 6 dB

FPS in games

Assassin’s Creed Valhalla

(2020)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M.

1920×1080 / Ultra / 12.5

2560×1440 / Ultra / 10.8

3840×2160 / Ultra / 7.3

Valorant

(2020)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M.

1920×1080 / Ultra / 54. 8

2560×1440 / Ultra / 44.8

3840×2160 / Ultra / 39.0

Death Stranding

(2020)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M.

1920×1080 / Ultra / 24.8

2560×1440 / Ultra / 19.2

3840×2160 / Ultra / 11.7

Cyberpunk 2077

(2020)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M.

1920×1080 / Ultra / 12.5

2560×1440 / Ultra / 11.7

3840×2160 / Ultra / 7.7

Apex Legends

(2019)

Better than AMD Radeon HD 7950, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.

1920×1080 / Ultra / 27.0

2560×1440 / Ultra / 20.1

3840×2160 / Ultra / 12. 0

Metro Exodus

(2019)

Better than AMD Radeon HD 7970M, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M.

1920×1080 / Ultra / 15.0

2560×1440 / Ultra / 11.7

3840×2160 / Ultra / 7.3

Red Dead Redemption 2

(2019)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M.

1920×1080 / Ultra / 12. 8

2560×1440 / Ultra / 10.5

3840×2160 / Ultra / 6.7

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

(2012)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M.

1920×1080 / Ultra / 79.9

2560×1440 / Ultra / 66.6

3840×2160 / Ultra / 59.9

League of Legends

(2019)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M, but worse than AMD Radeon R7 370.

1920×1080 / Ultra / 149.9

2560×1440 / Ultra / 83.3

3840×2160 / Ultra / 33.3

Benchmark tests

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: 5220 Better than AMD Radeon HD 7850 but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M.

Comparison with other graphics cards

Map 1:

Map 2:

Video reviews and tests

Error 403 The request cannot be completed because you have exceeded your quota. : quotaExceeded

If you find an error or have something to add, write in the comments. Have you had any experience with this video card? Is it worth buying such a card today?

AMD Radeon R7 265 Overview.

Benchmarks and specs

The AMD Radeon R7 265 graphics card (GPU) is in our performance ranking. Manufacturer: AMD. AMD Radeon R7 265 running at minimum clock speed. The graphics chip is equipped with an acceleration system and can operate in turbo mode or when overclocked at a frequency of 925 MHz. The RAM size is 4 GB GB with a clock speed of 1400 MHz and a bandwidth of 179.2 GB/s.

The power consumption of the AMD Radeon R7 265 is 150 Watt and the process technology is only 28 nm. Below you will find key compatibility, sizing, technology, and gaming performance test results. You can also leave comments if you have any questions.

Let’s take a closer look at the most important characteristics of the AMD Radeon R7 265. To get an idea of ​​which video card is better, we recommend using the comparison service.

4.5
From 10
Hitesti Grade

Popular video cards

Most viewed

AMD Radeon RX Vega 7

Intel UHD Graphics 630

Intel UHD Graphics 600

NVIDIA Quadro T1000

AMD Radeon RX Vega 10

NVIDIA GeForce MX330

Intel HD Graphics 530

Intel UHD Graphics 620

Intel HD Graphics 4600

Intel HD Graphics 520

Buy here:

AliExpress

General information

The base set of information will help you find out the release date of the AMD Radeon R7 265 graphics card and its purpose (laptops or PCs), as well as the price at the time of release and the average current cost. This data also includes the architecture used by the manufacturer and the video processor code name.

Performance Rating Position:		not rated
Architecture:		GCN 1.0
Code name:		Pitcairn
Type:		Desktop
Release date:		February 13, 2014 (7 years ago)
Starting price:		$149
Current price:		$600 (4x MSRP)
Design:		reference
GPU Code Name:		Pitcairn
Market segment:		Desktop

Specifications

This is important information that determines all the power characteristics of the AMD Radeon R7 265 video card. The smaller the chip manufacturing process, the better (in modern realities). The clock frequency of the core is responsible for its speed (direct correlation), while signal processing is carried out by transistors (the more transistors, the faster the calculations are performed, for example, in cryptocurrency mining).

Conveyors:		1024
Acceleration:		925MHz
Number of transistors:		2,800 million
Process:		28nm
Power consumption (TDP):		150 Watt
Number of texels processed in 1 second:		59.20
Floating point:		1.894 gflops
Pipelines / CUDA cores:		1024
Acceleration speed:		925MHz
Number of transistors:		2,800 million
Estimated heat output:		150 Watt

Dimensions, connectors and compatibility

There are many form factors of PC cases and laptop sizes today, so it is extremely important to know the length of the video card and its connection types (except for laptop options). This will help make the upgrade process easier, as Not all cases can accommodate modern video cards.

Interface:		PCIe 3.0 x16
Length:		210 mm
Additional power:		1 x 6-pin
Tire support:		PCIe 3.0

Memory (frequency and overclocking)

The internal memory is used to store data when performing calculations. Modern games and professional graphics applications place high demands on the amount and speed of memory. The higher this parameter, the more powerful and faster the video card. Memory type, size and bandwidth for AMD Radeon R7 265 + turbo overclocking capability.

Memory type:		GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount:		4GB
Memory bus width:		256 Bit
Memory frequency:		1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth:		179. 2 GB/s

Port and display support

As a rule, all modern video cards have several types of connection and additional ports, for example HDMI and DVI . Knowing these features is very important in order to avoid problems connecting a video card to a monitor or other peripherals.

Display connections:		2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Eyefinity:		1
HDMI:		+
DisplayPort support:		—

Technologies

Each graphics card manufacturer complements its products with proprietary technologies that are used both in games and in the workflow. Below is a list of features that will be useful to you.

AppAcceleration:		—
CrossFire:		1
FreeSync:		1
HD3D:		—
PowerTune:		—
TrueAudio:		—
ZeroCore:		—
DDMA audio:		+
Enduro:		—

API support

All APIs supported by the AMD Radeon R7 265 graphics card are listed below. This is a minor factor that does not greatly affect the overall performance.

DirectX:		DirectX® 12
OpenGL:		4.6
Shader Model:		5.1
OpenCL:		1.2
Mantle:		—

General gaming performance

All tests are based on FPS. Let’s take a look at how the AMD Radeon R7 265 scores in the gaming performance test (calculated based on the game developer’s recommended system requirements and may differ from actual situations).

Select games
Horizon Zero DawnDeath StrandingF1 2020Gears TacticsDoom EternalHunt ShowdownEscape from TarkovHearthstoneRed Dead Redemption 2Star Wars Jedi Fallen OrderNeed for Speed ​​HeatCall of Duty Modern Warfare 2019GRID 2019Ghost Recon BreakpointFIFA 20Borderlands 3ControlF1 2019League of LegendsTotal War: Three KingdomsRage 2Anno 1800The Division 2Dirt Rally 2. 0AnthemMetro ExodusFar Cry New DawnApex LegendsJust Cause 4Darksiders IIIFarming Simulator 19Battlefield VFallout 76Hitman 2Call of Duty Black Ops 4Assassin´s Creed OdysseyForza Horizon 4FIFA 19Shadow of the Tomb RaiderStrange BrigadeF1 2018Monster Hunter WorldThe Crew 2Far Cry 5World of Tanks enCoreX-Plane 11.11Kingdom Come: DeliveranceFinal Fantasy XV BenchmarkFortniteStar Wars Battlefront 2Need for Speed ​​PaybackCall of Duty WWIIAssassin´s Creed OriginsWolfenstein II: The New ColossusDestiny 2ELEXThe Evil Survival 2Middle-earth:8 Shadow of WarFIFA EvolvedF1 2017Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (2017)Team Fortress 2Dirt 4Rocket LeaguePreyMass Effect AndromedaGhost Recon WildlandsFor HonorResident Evil 7Dishonored 2Call of Duty Infinite WarfareTitanfall 2Farming Simulator 17Civilization VIBattlefield 1Mafia 3Deus Ex Mankind Divid edMirror’s Edge CatalystOverwatchDoomAshes of the SingularityHitman 2016The DivisionFar Cry PrimalXCOM 2Rise of the Tomb RaiderRainbow Six SiegeAssassin’s Creed SyndicateStar Wars BattlefrontFallout 4Call of Duty: Black Ops 3Anno 2205World of WarshipsDota 2 RebornThe Witcher 3Dirt RallyGTA VDragon Age: InquisitionFar Cry 4Assassin’s Creed UnityCall of Duty: Advanced WarfareAlien: IsolationMiddle-earth: Shadow of MordorSims 4Wolfenstein: The New OrderThe Elder Scrolls OnlineThiefX-Plane 10. 25Battlefield 4Total War: Rome IICompany of Heroes 2Metro: Last LightBioShock InfiniteStarCraft II: Heart of the SwarmSimCityTomb RaiderCrysis 3Hitman: AbsolutionCall of Duty: Black Ops 2World of Tanks v8Border 2Counter-Strike: GODirt ShowdownDiablo IIIMass Effect 3The Elder Scrolls V: SkyrimBattlefield 3Deus Ex Human RevolutionStarCraft 2Metro 2033Stalker: Call of PripyatGTA IV — Grand Theft AutoLeft 4 DeadTrackmania Nations ForeverCall of Duty 4 — Modern WarfareSupreme Commander — FA BenchCrysi s — GPU BenchmarkWorld in Conflict — BenchmarkHalf Life 2 — Lost Coast BenchmarkWorld of WarcraftDoom 3Quake 3 Arena — TimedemoHalo InfiniteFarming Simulator 22Battlefield 2042Forza Horizon 5Riders RepublicGuardians of the GalaxyBack 4 BloodDeathloopF1 2021Days GoneResident Evil VillageHitman 3Cyberpunk 2077Assassin´s Creed ValhallaDirt 5Watch Dogs LegionMafia Definitive EditionCyberpunk 2077 1.5 GRID LegendsDying Light 2Rainbow Six ExtractionGod of War

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Horizon Zero Dawn (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Death Stranding (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

F1 2020 (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Gears Tactics (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Doom Eternal (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Description
5	Stutter — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been studied enough. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to stutter and display low frame rates.
	May Stutter — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been studied enough. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to stutter and display low frame rates.
30	Fluent — Based on all known benchmarks with the specified graphic settings, this game is expected to run at 25fps or more
40	Fluent — Based on all known benchmarks with the specified graphic settings, this game is expected to run at 35fps or more
60	Fluent — According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphic settings, this game is expected to run at 58 fps or more
	May Run Fluently — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been sufficiently studied. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to show smooth frame rates.
?	Uncertain — testing this video card in this game showed unexpected results. A slower card could deliver higher and more consistent frame rates while running the same reference scene.
	Uncertain — The performance of this video card in this game has not yet been studied enough. It is not possible to reliably interpolate data based on the performance of similar cards in the same category.
The value in the fields reflects the average frame rate across the entire database. To get individual results, hover over a value.

AMD Radeon R7 265 in benchmark results

Benchmarks help determine performance in standard AMD Radeon R7 265 benchmarks. We’ve compiled a list of the world’s best-known benchmarks so you can get accurate results for each one (see description). Pre-testing the graphics card is especially important when there are high loads, so that the user can see how the graphics processor copes with calculations and data processing.

Overall performance in benchmarks

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics is a special Benchmark that is made for testing GPU and its components. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results for any graphic card on Hitesti.com

AMD Radeon R9 M290X

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M

AMD Radeon R7 265

AMD Radeon HD 7850

AMD Radeon RX 460 Mobile

4.5
From 10
Hitesti Grade

Share on social networks:

You need to log in to write a review

Review AMD Radeon R7 265

Compare AMD Radeon R7 265

VS

AMD Bonaire

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition

AMD Radeon R5 M230

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

AMD Fiji

AMD Cypress

AMD Radeon HD 7990

Sapphire Radeon R7 265 900Mhz PCI-E 3.

0 2048Mb 5600Mhz 256 bit 2xDVI HDMI HDCP

Advantages

Defects

Comment

Estimated

I accept the terms
providing data.

Average rating Sapphire Radeon R7 265 900Mhz PCI-E 3.0 2048Mb 5600Mhz 256 bit 2xDVI HDMI HDCP — 3. 67
There are 3 known reviews about Sapphire Radeon R7 265 900Mhz PCI-E 3.0 2048Mb 5600Mhz 256 bit 2xDVI HDMI HDCP

From 11 sources we collected 3 negative, negative and positive reviews.

We will show all the advantages and disadvantages of Sapphire Radeon R7 265 900Mhz PCI-E 3.0 2048Mb 5600Mhz 256 bit 2xDVI HDMI HDCP detected by users. We do not hide anything and post all positive and negative honest customer reviews about Sapphire Radeon R7 265 900Mhz PCI-E 3.0 2048Mb 5600Mhz 256 bit 2xDVI HDMI HDCP, and we also offer alternative analogues. Is it worth it to buy — the decision is only yours!

Best deals on Sapphire Radeon R7 265 900Mhz PCI-E 3.0 2048Mb 5600Mhz 256 bit 2xDVI HDMI HDCP

Reviews of Sapphire Radeon R7 265 900Mhz PCI-E 3.0 2048Mb 5600Mhz 256 bit 2xDVI HDMI HDCP

Information about recalls updated on 05.10.2022

write a feedback

Volodin Denis, 12/12/2017

Advantages:
I was attracted to this video card by not bad declared characteristics and price.

Disadvantages:
After I bought and tested this vidyuhi, I was not very satisfied. The declared characteristics are somehow not felt, many games (which, in theory, should normally run at such indicators) do not run even after updating the drivers. Although if you take the tighter geforce with more modest characteristics that I had before, then its efficiency looks much better.

Comment:
In general, of course, the video card is mediocre.

Mowgli Wild, 01/06/2015

Advantages:
Large size copper heatsink, large soleplate, non-fluxed heatsink tubes, allow sandpaper to remove plaque from copper, improving cooling. The chip is chasing if you know how to do it.

Disadvantages:
They simply do not exist

Comment:
So, the review came from Wild Mowgli. It is a pity that at this time it is no longer on sale 🙁
I bought a video card for games. And she approached me, in plain text! I chose according to the characteristics, weeded out with poor cooling, and chose this one. A large copper radiator, a large sole, non-fluxed radiator tubes make it possible to remove plaque from copper with sandpaper, improving cooling. The chip is chasing if you know how to do it.

Guest, 07/19/2014

Advantages:
2 very quiet coolers, you can hardly even hear it. The cooling system is perfect, it does not heat up just like that. All my games run great! Originally bought for video and photo editors! 256 bits DDR5!

Weaknesses:
none.

Comment:
For the money this option is the best!!!

General specifications

Video card type

office/gaming

GPU

AMD Radeon R7 265

Interface

PCI-E 16x 3.0

GPU code name

Pitcairn PRO

Manufacturing process

28 nm

Number of monitors supported

3

Maximum resolution

4096×2160

Specifications

GPU frequency

900 MHz

Video memory size

2048 MB

Video memory type

GDDR5

Video memory frequency

5600 MHz

Video memory bus width

256 bit

Frequency RAMDAC

400 MHz

SLI/CrossFire support

is

CrossFire X support

is

Connection

Connectors

DVI x2, support HDCP, HDMI, DisplayPort

HDMI version

1. 4a

Math block

Number of universal processors

1024

Shader version

5.0

Number of texture units

64

Number of ROPs

32

Maximum anisotropic filtering

16x

Maximum grade FSAA

24x

Standards

DirectX 12, OpenGL 4.5

Additional features

OpenCL version

1.2

AMD APP support (ATI Stream)

is

Additional power required

yes, 6 pin

TDP

150 W

Cooling design

custom

Number of fans

2

Dimensions

228×109 mm

Number of slots occupied

2

Before buying, check the technical characteristics and equipment with the seller

Manufacturers

• ASUS1189
• GIGABYTE1047
• MSI955
• Sapphire659
• Palit655
• PowerColor390
• 903D3820433
• XFX266
• Gainward257
• HIS204
• EVGA164
• PNY109
• Leadtek83
• KFA275
• Sparkle72
• Point of View56
• HP41
• VTX3D33
• Albatron27
• ECS27
• Manli26
• Foxconn20
• Colorful20
• GALAXY20
• GeCube16
• Chaintech23
• Club-3D13
• Forsa10
• BFG10
• AMD9
• ASRock7
• GALAX6
• FORCE3D6
• XpertVision6
• AFOX5
• VVIKOO2
• Lenovo2
• Jetway2
• Biostar2
• OCZ2
• ZOGIS2
• Matrox2
• Diablotek2
• Sysconn2
• Diamond2
• NVIDIA1

show more

AMD Radeon R7 265 specs, price and review

Video card		AMD Radeon R7 265
Market (main)		Desktop
Release date		Q1 2014
Model Number		215-0828062, Pitcairn PRO
GPU name		Pitcairn
Architecture		GCN 1. 0
Generation		Volcanic Islands R7 200
Lithograph		28nm
Transistors		2.800.000.000
Bus interface		PCIe 3.0 x16

GPU base clock		900MHz
GPU clock speed		925MHz
Memory frequency		1.400 MHz
Effective memory speed		5.6 GB/s

Memory size		2GB
Memory type		GDDR5
Memory Bus		256 Bit
Memory bandwidth		179. 2 GB/s
TDP		150W
Multi-card technology		—
Outlets		2x DVI 1x HDMI 1x DisplayPort
Cores (computing units, SM, SMX)		16

Unit shading		1.024
TMUs		64
ROPs		32
Cache		512KB
Pixel Fill Rate		29.6 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate		59.2 GTexel/s
Performance FP32 (float)		1.9TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double)		118. 4 GFLOPS

Latest devices

More from the same brand

Official PC System Requirements for Sackboy: A Big Adventure

Revealed

Sony has released the system requirements for the PC version of Sackboy: A Big Adventure. Specifications are forgiving.

Sumo Digital recommends an Intel Core i7-4770K or AMD Ryzen 5 1500X processor, 8 GB of RAM, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 or AMD Radeon RX580 graphics cards. The game also requires 60 GB of free hard disk space.

Sackboy: A Big Adventure will support NVIDIA DLSS 2 AI-upscaling, 21:9 ultra-wide monitors, and variable refresh rates.

Minimum system requirements:

• OS: Windows 10 64-bit (version 1809)
• Processor: Intel Core i5-6400 @ 2.7GHz or AMD FX-6300 @ 3.5GHz

  RAM

• GB
• Video card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 or AMD Radeon R7 265
• Disk space: 60 GB (SSD recommended)

Recommended system requirements:

• OS: Windows 10 64-bit (version 1809)

CPU: Intel3 iK7

• GHz or AMD Ryzen 5 1500X @ 3.5 GHz
• RAM: 8 GB
• Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 or AMD Radeon RX580
• Storage: 60 GB free space
• Disk space: 60 GB (SSD recommended)

2022-09-30 10:05:50

Dmitry Krivov

Sackboy: A Big Adventure

Meet the Collector’s Edition of The Callisto Protocol. Known price

Dragon Age: Dreadwolf will appeal to fans and new players alike. BioWare promises a story for everyone

News

Publications

Absolute gacha. Tower of Fantasy Review

Reviews

October 04 17:59

eleven

Tower of Fantasy (available on smartphones and PCs) was expected to compete with the great Genshin Impact. The developers did not even try to avoid comparing the two projects. On the contrary, they emphasized that during the development of the game they peeped a lot from HoYoverse, calling Genshin Impact the new standard. Did you manage to match?

What to play in October: Scorn, A Plague Tale 2, Bayonetta 3, Persona 5, Victoria 3

Results

October 03 11:20

9

It was expected that October will be rich in releases, but not so much!. Genre diversity rolls over: action movies, tactics, global strategies, role-playing games and even slashers. In 2022, there has not been a single month that would have been so busy.

What to play on a smartphone. Lost Light, Tank Company, Wild Arena Survivors, Railbound, Iron Marines Invasion

Results

September 30 21:28

3

In this issue: Chinese developers have released «their» Escape from Tarkov and World of Tanks, French — Fortnite, Uruguayan — StarCraft. Polish developers were more original and created a puzzle for all ages. In addition, Genshin Impact 3.1 expanded Sumeru’s area, Tower of Fantasy 2.0 introduced a cyberpunk city, and Ubisoft showed off new mobile games.

French robbery. Should Ubisoft games cost $70?

Articles

September 29 20:22

12

The announcement of an important change in the pricing policy of the French company was a thin thread through the news portals and on the same day they forgot about it.