AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM vs Intel HD Graphics 2500
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM and Intel HD Graphics 2500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.
AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM
Buy on Amazon
vs
Intel HD Graphics 2500
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher core clock speed: 875 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 6.
1x more texture fill rate: 7 GTexel / s vs 1.15 GTexel / s
- 26.7x more pipelines: 160 vs 6
- 20.3x better floating-point performance: 280.0 gflops vs 13.8 gflops
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench — OpenCL: 869 vs 401
| Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 1 April 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 875 MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 7 GTexel / s vs 1.15 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 160 vs 6 |
| Floating-point performance | 280.0 gflops vs 13.8 gflops |
| Geekbench — OpenCL | 869 vs 401 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 2500
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 40 nm |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 2500
| Geekbench — OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM | Intel HD Graphics 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 262 | |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 174 | |
| Geekbench — OpenCL | 869 | 401 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
1.988 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 104.327 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.239 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.628 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.365 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 672 | |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
1078 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 2093 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 672 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 1078 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 2093 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM | Intel HD Graphics 2500 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Generation 7. 0 |
| Code name | Caicos | Ivy Bridge GT1 |
| Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 1 April 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1412 | 1554 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Core clock speed | 875 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 280.0 gflops | 13.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 22 nm |
| Pipelines | 160 | 6 |
| Texture fill rate | 7 GTexel / s | 1. 15 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 370 million | 392 million |
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| DirectX | 11.
|