Radeon RX 5600 XT Gets Modded With 12GB Of VRAM For A Huge Performance Boost
homeVideos
It can be easy to overlook VRAM capacity when shopping for a new mainstream graphics card. After all, having more than you need does not really confer any extra performance. Too little though? Well, that can result in stutters, graphical artifacts, and generally poor performance. It is becoming a hot topic as more and more modern AAA games are requiring massive resources, which can cripple otherwise capable GPUs.
AMD has taken some pleasure in pointing out deficiencies in some of NVIDIA’s offerings, but even the red team isn’t perfect. The Brazilian electronics repair team behind the Paulo Gomes channel on YouTube have released a series of videos where they physically add or swap memory chips on NVIDIA GeForce cards to expand VRAM capacity. The results have clearly laid bare the impact of insufficient video memory on gaming performance.
The subject of the latest video, however, is an AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT. This Navi 10 based card was released in January of 2020 at a time when its 6GB frame buffer would have been considered more than enough for its performance category and 1080p gaming. While that assessment is still somewhat true, there are cases where that 6GB can be overrun, no matter how unrealistic.
Radeon RX 5700 XT Stock Benchmark Run
Case in point, Paulo Gomes shows the unmodified card running the Unigine Superposition benchmark at a ludicrous 10240 x 4320 resolution. That factors out to just north of 44 megapixels, or around 21.3x the pixel count of 1080p. It is little surprise then that the card chokes out an average of 1.43 FPS and a score of 191.
Inspecting the Radeon RX 5700 XT After Memory Swap
Noting that the VRAM buffer was maxed out through the run (6000+ MB in use), they decided to see what doubling the memory capacity could do for performance. The video details the process of desoldering the 6 x 1GB Samsung memory chips and replacing them with 2GB variants to bring the total capacity up to 12GB.
He explains that the two remaining chips are unused and do not need to be replaced. That’s just enough to support the benchmark’s full VRAM load, which sits just north of 10GB.
Modifying The ROM With A Hex Editor
As with the NVIDIA cards, the mod requires more than a simple chip swap. Unlike the NVIDIA cards, it is actually feasible to edit the AMD GPU’s ROM so other workarounds (like borrowing a VBIOS from a higher memory variant or swapping around resistors) are unnecessary. Some selected edits with a hex editor and reflash were all that was needed here – and a pile of research to figure out what edits to make in the first place.
Before And After Unigine Benchmark Results
With the VRAM now clocking in at 12272 MB, the card was rerun through the ultra high-res Unigine Superposition test. The results are still pitiful, but in a relative sense the average framerate has more than doubled to 3.09 FPS. Now scoring 412, the mod yielded a 216% improvement in framerate which is remarkable.
My own GeForce RTX 4090 clocks in around 21FPS in these same conditions, for reference, and that costs an order of magnitude more.
Of course, few would expect to play Minesweeper at a resolution of 10240 x 4320, let alone run a dynamically lit 3D scene on the Radeon RX 5600 XT. Nevertheless, it is a fun exploration of commonly overlooked bottlenecks in a system. At the same time, we would caution readers about putting too much emphasis on these results.
YouTube Can Auto-Translate Captions From Portuguese Under Settings
Apart from a few select titles, VRAM limitations even on leaner cards are seldom much of an issue within a card’s intended resolution and performance class. Even if a higher resolution is demanded, gamers can compensate by turning down texture quality or other settings without missing out on too much of the visual experience. We would, of course, like to see cards outfitted with more VRAM from the jump – looking at you, GeForce RTX 4070 Series – but the flip side would bring even greater cost without any tangible benefit in many games.
Passive AMD Radeon RX 6400 Mod Dwarfs Compact Graphics Card PCB
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works.
(Image credit: revocases on reddit)
Silent PC enthusiast and redditor revocases has been showing off a very interesting AMD Radeon RX 6400 modification (h/t FanlessTech). The modification work meant chucking away the stock active cooler, precisely machining a 3 mm copper cold plate and mount (covering both GPU and memory), and then fixing on an Arctic Accelero S1 passive cooler (discontinued). In testing, the project was a resounding success, with the GPU running at just a smidgeon over 50 degrees Celsius under load – but we have to ask, is this passive solution overkill?
Passive PC systems have a strong following, as silence is golden. However, to cool higher performance PC components a passive cooler might sometimes start to dominate your build. We have seen this with some recent implementations of passive coolers and cases.
To be fair, we wouldn’t put revocases’ RX 6400 mod into this category, though.
The Radeon RX 6400 is a 54W graphics card, so doesn’t present a strenuous challenge for passive cooling technology. Instead we could say the low TGP makes the card a comfortable target for a modest passive cooling adaptation. In revocases’ shared images you can see that the passively cooled (ex)low-profile Radeon ran at a more than comfortable average GPU temperature of 54 degrees Celsius (hot spot 60) when under full load. Sadly, off-the-peg choices for passive GPU coolers are incredibly limited or we would suggest using a smaller one.
Image 1 of 4
(Image credit: revocases on reddit)(Image credit: revocases on reddit)(Image credit: revocases on reddit)(Image credit: revocases on reddit)
In the images, the RX 6400 PCB is absolutely dwarfed by the Arctic Accelero S1, and might look somewhat silly outside of the context of a PC. However, in November last year we reported on the Intel Arc A380 (>75W) being cooled by the same Arctic Accelero S1.
In the visual context of a complete passive build that card looked reasonable – it was installed next to a Noctua NH-P1 cooled CPU.
Considering things from another angle, a commercially produced passive card like the Palit GeForce GTX 1650 KalmX looks well proportioned at 138 x 178 x 38 mm, and the GPU will peek at around 80 degrees Celsius under load. The Palit isn’t a great amount smaller than the Arctic Accelero S1 cooler at 138 x 215 x 33 mm (but you have to add the card which will add further bulk).
We hope that the great efficiency gains touted for the latest AMD and Nvidia graphics architectures means that some more compact passive commercially available graphics cards hit the market. Graphics card makers could be attracted by the passive premium that silent PC enthusiasts might pay for something more performant than the likes of the RX 6400, Arc A380, or GTX 1650.
Join the experts who read Tom’s Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years.
We’ll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.
Contact me with news and offers from other Future brandsReceive email from us on behalf of our trusted partners or sponsors
Mark Tyson is a Freelance News Writer at Tom’s Hardware US. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason.
Topics
GPUs
AMD Radeon HD 5670 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT240 / Habr
Dear Habro-readers, below I published a literary translation of an article by a good friend of OCClub.ru, a well-known Romanian IT journalist and overclocker Monstru , one of the founders of the LAB501 project. I decided to share this material with you for a reason — I really liked the style of analytics (in IT, unfortunately, there is very little journalism in general, and this is just such a “hot” example :)), and the topic is very, very relevant. I invite you to evaluate the work of my colleague too!
Attention! Under the cut — quite a lot of photos.
Introduction
Much has been written about the cool, powerful, tasty, especially from the point of view of overclockers and gamers-maniacs, and the most expensive dual-chip AMD Radeon HD 5970, but today we will talk, on the contrary, about the cheapest (at the moment) video card in the Radeon HD 5xxx line , codenamed Redwood (mahogany) AMD Radeon HD 5670 , which can be a «ray of light» for users who do not have abnormal budgets. To be honest, you experience a strange feeling when, after opening the box, you come face to face with a sound card with a DVI output, especially if you have dealt only with top products before. You don’t feel any better when you run into her quiet «girlfriend» from HIS — a Batman-on-steroids-style cooled network card. Usually, I avoided such “pieces of jewelry”, but I must admit that now, during the economic recession, these little ones will be of interest to many readers who prefer video cards priced around $100. So I stocked up on patience, stuck a “sound card” into the test bench, put on Batman ears, and sat down for tests to find out if it was possible to play on it somehow? Am I right in my skepticism or wrong? What will be seen next.
But not before I say a few words about what’s going on :). The situation on the market for graphics cards now, frankly speaking, is interesting, unique and even unexpected. AMD was the first to release the powerful 5-series, which not only introduced support for the DirectX 11 , but also has a monstrous processing power, and this applies to graphics cards of all price segments. HD 5970, HD 5870, HD 5850, HD 5770 and HD 5750 are simply trendsetters in the current market, while NVIDIA is all about «enriching» its range with PhysX, CUDA, 3D Vision technologies, but not new products. AMD graphics cards dominate the entire lineup, but face affordability and usability issues, and NVIDIA waves “future technology” — Tesla, 3D imaging, 40nm process technology in front of our noses and renames old products … GT 240, GTS 240 … Who are they on figs needed?! Give us a GT300 and period, instead of releasing old «new» products for 7-8 months already!
To be honest, I don’t like NVIDIA’s marketing policy last year at all.
Well, okay, I’m willing to forgive them for that, but the painful delay in launching a new generation of their graphics chips has affected us all, whether we realize it or not. Because of this, AMD, whose key sales until recently were based on providing the best price-performance ratio, has dramatically shaken up the price lists, and now we have tighter prices for cheaper products. Until you catch the meaning in my words? Well, let’s not beat around the bush… Simply put, the video card, which now stands like the HD 4770 at the start of sales, is replacing the HD 4650 — feel the irony! The lack of a real reaction from a competitor hit the market segment, where 7 bucks is still what a fucking difference!
I’ve been out of the middle for too long, so I’ve become overly optimistic. Well, now it depends only on what kind of performance the new product will show, whether I will change my attitude towards it or not.
Product introduction
For testing, I received from HIS a reference version of the AMD Radeon HD 5670 and a proprietary model with a dual-slot Ice-Q cooling system from Arctic Cooling.
We are exploring the retail version of HIS, which should soon appear in stores. The package contains the video card itself, CD with drivers and user manual. Quite enough, considering that we are dealing with an entry-level product, albeit with non-reference cooling.
The solution from HIS made me soften my opinion a bit — the card looks really good. When the graphics card is being cooled by a system significantly larger than the reference model, it starts to look like a small diamond to me.
Connectors are varied (D-SUB, DVI and HDMI) and cover the entire range of interfaces currently in use.
The cooling system occupies two slots and exhausts hot air outside the PC case. This is a definite plus, which cannot be said about the reference AMD Radeon HD 5670, which will fry hoo! Also, the 80mm fan keeps the chipset cooler at lower RPMs, making this a very quiet product, which you can’t help but admit is quite impressive for a product in this price range.
The heatsink used in Arctic Cooling’s cooling system is all aluminum. It has a fair amount of spacing between the fins, which allows this specimen to achieve low temperatures with fairly low airflow. The only drawback of the non-reference heatsink is the lack of direct contact with the memory chips, but, as stability tests show, they are not prone to overheating, so in practice this is not so important.
Comparison with reference card
We haven’t had a chance to test a retail reference version of the card (and something tells me we’ll see more variants of AMD/ATI «reference» models provided as first engineering samples for testing), but obviously it will have a small a cooler that is objectively louder than that of the HIS solution, and a black textolite (in HIS it is dark blue), but, except for configuration engineering switches and output ports, the boards will be identical.
As I said about the comparison of output ports, HIS has D-SUB, DVI and HDMI on the card, while AMD’s engineering sample has VDI, HDMI and Display Port.
The absence of D-SUB in this price segment seems counterintuitive, but it’s most likely because AMD wanted to show that even the tiny HD 5670 could use Eyefinity technology.
I think the most attentive readers have already noticed that something is missing here. To be honest, this is generally the first thing I looked for while sitting at the presentation — yeah, we are talking about the CrossFire connector. Yes, ladies and gentlemen, despite the fact that I carefully examined all three reference samples at the presentation, I did not find anything like this on any of them. This unfortunately limits the use of the AMD Radeon HD 5670 in a CrossFire array to only two video cards combined by means of a motherboard. Although I was very curious to know how three of these «animals» would behave in CrossFireX, it is impossible to know physically.
Looking at cooling systems, it’s not hard to imagine that very soon we will see fanless solutions ideal for HTPC enthusiasts.
Under the hood
Okay, now that we have twisted the video cards and examined them from all sides, let’s do what both me and the readers like the most — stripping :). I «bare» both video cards — HIS and AMD Radeon HD 5670.
The board is as simple as possible, which makes it look like an HD 4770. A two-phase power circuit for the GPU and one phase for powering GDDR5 is quite enough for the little Red Tree. The memory chips are manufactured by Hynix and certified to operate at 1 GHz (4 GHz effective QDR frequency). Note the absence of CrossFire pins in the photos provided. However, as I said before, you can use the software CrossFire of two boards that communicate only through the motherboard bus.
Specifications
The AMD Radeon HD 5670 belongs to the 5 series of AMD graphics cards, so we have DirectX 11 support, 40nm manufacturing process and GDDR5 memory. The memory bus width is kept at 128 bit, like in the HD 57xx, and the number of stream processors is reduced to 400 (half compared to the HD 57xx).
By comparison, the AMD Radeon HD 4770 has 640 stream processors but only supports DirectX 10.1. The processor performance of 620 Gflops also tells us that we are not dealing with weak graphics, but we will judge this after practical tests. Another thing to mention is that the HD 5670 is a sub-$100 card that can stream HD content (video and audio) over an HDMI cable without issue.
Eyefinity, HDMI 1.3a with support for Dolby True HD and DTS Master Audio — indicate AMD in their presentation. I draw your attention to the critical aspects: ~$100, ~61W. «Fairly low price, very economical» — this is how I would describe this video card if I had to do it in a short SMS.
Test platform
For the AMD Radeon HD 5670 benchmark, I’ll be using the platform I previously used for the Gigabyte GeForce GT240 benchmark. Why? And to understand how these two new products are positioned relative to each other. I do this for clarity of information — not for direct comparison.
To remove all the «bottlenecks» from the platform, I used an Intel Core i7 870, overclocked to 4 GHz, 4 GB DDR3 2000 CL9Avexir, P55-based High-End motherboard — EVGA Classified P55 NF200. However, it is clear that happy HD 5670 buyers are clearly not in the «Classified + i870» category, so I also used the second test platform, consisting of a Biostar TH55 XE, Core i3 530 at stock frequency (2.93 GHz) and 4 GB DDR3 1333 CL9. In other words, an inexpensive but powerful platform. I also wanted to test the E4300 + DFI Infinity P965-S + 2 GB DDR2, but Windows 7 with the 965th DFI chipset and HD 5670 refused to be friends, so due to some lack of time I had to abandon this idea.
Test stand:
Processor:
1) Intel Core i7 870 @ 4GHz
2) Intel Core i3 530 @ 2.93GHz
Motherboard:
1) EVGA Classified P55 NF200
2) Biostar TH55 XE
RAM:
2×2 GB DDR3 2000 MHz Avexir
1) 2000 MHz 9-9-9-24 1T
2) 1333MHz 9-9-9-24 1T
Cooling: Noctua NH-U12P + Coolink SWIF 2 120P 1950 rpm
Video card:
1) Gigabyte GeForce GT240 93 GHz versus the more powerful 4-core, 8-thread Lynnfield at 4 GHz when paired with an entry-level graphics card.
Also, the difference in memory settings was huge (DDR3 2000 MHz CL9 vs. DDR3 1333 MHz CL9), which made it possible to finally answer the question of whether it makes sense to spend money on memory «with requests» for systems of this performance level.
Specifications:
| Graphics chip | HD 5670 | GT240 |
| Chip name | Redwood | GT215 |
| GPU frequency | 775 MHz | 550 MHz |
| Memory frequency | 1000 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Shader frequency | 775 MHz | 1340 MHz |
| GDDR capacity | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| Number of shaders | 400 | 96 |
| Texture blocks (ROP) | 8 | 8 |
| Process | 40nm | 40nm |
| GPU frequency (overclocking) | 850 MHz | 615 MHz |
| Memory frequency (overclocking) | 1000 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Schneider frequency (acceleration) | 850 MHz | 1500 MHz |
AMD’s new product is priced head to head with the Gigabyte GeForce GT240 equipped with 512 MB GDDR5 (~$100).
This is the latest NVIDIA product launched in the entry-level segment, manufactured using the 40nm process technology and bringing support for DirectX 10.1. The Gigabyte version is also in «Batman-style», as you can see from the photo.
Testing
As always, we start with synthetic tests to determine the «gross» performance of the tested video cards.
3DMark 2003
The HD 5670 immediately pulled away from the GT240, and the lead is significant for this level of performance. CrossFire achieved a significant performance boost, although the gain could not overcome the 50% performance of a single video card.
3DMark 2005
The situation remained unchanged in 3DMark 2005, however, the HD 5670 outperforms its rival GT240 by far less than in the previous benchmark.
3DMark 2006
The performance difference between the competitors’ graphics cards remained at the same level in 3DMark 2006, but was unexpectedly surprised by CrossFire, which managed to impress us with ~90% gain.
It looks like the latest graphics technology has managed to increase the value of adding a second graphics card to a computer.
3DMark Vantage
And Vantage also notes an increase in gain from the second video card, while the difference between the GT240 and HD 5670 remains unshakable.
Game tests
This time games are a really interesting agenda item even for me: I’ve always been curious to see what these «3D gnomes» can do. The choice of settings this time required great delicacy and serious preliminary testing to select the optimal settings for each game. Finally, I decided to settle for 1680 x 1050 with two levels of detail where possible. Thus, I tried to choose a number of settings that brought the results closer to a playable level, because, in the end, these video cards will be bought in huge quantities not by benchmarking monsters, but by users who just want to play.
FarCry2
Well, who would doubt that we will start with FarCry2 — Duna is still one of the most advanced graphics engines at the moment.
Unfortunately, it was not possible to select two levels of detail in DX10 mode — any increase in them led to blocking of test results or too low frame rates. Thus, the presets for DX10 were used with all settings in Hihg mode without anti-aliasing (smoothing). Fire, physics and trees have been set to low, while textures have been set to medium. Any attempt to run the test with these settings on Hihg would crash the test. This is likely a driver issue that occurs even with performance-limiting settings.
It is immediately evident that the difference between competing video cards is negligible. Yes, 3-4 frames per second is about 8-10% at 45 fps, but at this level this difference does not affect the normal gameplay in any way. Much more interesting is the monstrous gain that CrossFire has given, so the addition of a second video card can significantly change the gaming experience.
And finally, but no less interesting to compare the two platforms Core i3 530 at 2.
93 GHz and Core i7 870 at 4 GHz, and the difference between them is … zero!
Tom Clancy’s HAWX
Thanks to the implementation of DX10.1, HAWX has always been a very interesting benchmark, and AMD graphics cards have had the upper hand on this issue. Well, now NVIDIA graphics cards also support DX 10.1, so I was very interested in what we would get in the end. In HAWX (as well as in other games, with the exception of FarCry2) I was able to use two levels of quality settings at a resolution of 1680 x 1050. Thus, the first time I ran the benchmark with high detail and 2x anti-aliasing (AA x2), and the second — with less detail (low/medium) and anti-aliasing off. At pen settings, the difference between AMD and NVIDIA is quite large, but it’s almost negligible when you run the test in low detail. Again there is a monstrous gain from using CrossFire, but no difference between the two platforms.
Resident Evil 5
Resident Evil 5 holds its own: ~10% difference between AMD and NVIDIA, while the multi-card configuration shoots for 50% (except in anti-aliased high detail mode, where even it stumbles).
Again (yes, I know, I’m repeating myself) no difference between a stock Core i3 and an overclocked Core i7.
STALKER: Call of Pripyat
Call of Pripyat is one of the first games to use DX11, providing a thrilling visual experience for the user. Interestingly, Call of Pripyat is the only game where the GT240 celebrated victory. At high settings the GT240 manages to go further than the HD 5670, but at low details the performance is again the same. And it’s quite interesting that both video cards get approximately the same results in the first three tests (Day, Night, Rain, Sunshafts) and experience serious problems in the 4th, where the HD 5670 gains 1.5 fps, and the GT240 — 5 fps.
The increase in CrossFire is slightly smaller — about 30%, and there is obviously no difference between the stock Core i3 and the overclocked Core i7.
Temperatures
I must say that from the very beginning of testing until its end, there were no problems with the temperature reached by the devices during the tests.
The AMD reference card reached 69°C at 39% fan speed when overclocked, and 67°C at typical settings with the fan at 38%. The HIS model behaved similarly, reaching 70°C at 39% of cooler operation during overclocking and 68°C at 37% of the maximum speed at standard settings. Obviously, the fundamental difference between the two solutions is in the noise level, which is significantly lower for HIS. The GT240 also follows the trend, showing 72°C at 35% cooler, showing very low noise levels, thanks to a non-reference cooling system from Gigabyte. Although I laughed at him at the beginning, Batman does his job very well!
Obviously, with this power consumption (61W), the HD 5670 is great for HTPCs and fans of silent computers. Of course, fanless solutions will not keep you waiting long and will allow you to find complete silence.
Influence of used CPUs
Although I could not test everything that was originally intended (an even weaker processor — Intel Core 2 Duo E4300), I was able to compare two platforms: Intel Core i3 530 + DDR3 1333 MHz CL9 and Intel Core i7 870 + DDR3 2000 MHz CL9 — and the results are inspiring.
If the budget does not allow you to buy a powerful graphics solution, then the processor will not affect performance in any way, for example, the HD 5670 — the system is limited by processing power, and not by CPU frequency, as is the case with more expensive video cards. Thus, you can save a significant amount by purchasing a relatively cheap Core i3-based platform and a graphics card from the latest AMD Radeom 5-series line. In other words, a system that can play at 1680 x 1050 resolution with medium detail settings, can play full HD video and has an acceptable noise level can be purchased for as little as $700. Personally, I think this is a very good buy. It is worth noting that, obviously, the impact of the processor will be higher if you run games at a lower resolution, but in this case it becomes not very clear the point of purchasing a video card with support for DX 11.
Pins
So we’ve reached the end of our 3D gnome adventure and it’s time to draw the line. What do you think, to stay in the position voiced at the very beginning of the material? Or acknowledge the success of the HD 5670? My personal opinion — it all depends on the price.
The closer it gets to $100, the more confident we can say that the HD 5670 is worth the money and outperforms competitors in the same price range. The news is encouraging — the first batches received in online stores are sold at a price in the range of 112 — 119dollars. One particular product that definitely deserves attention is the HIS HD 5670 because, in my opinion, the Arctic Cooling Silencer cooling system gives it some added value at the same price and provides decent noise levels. Perhaps we will see similar solutions from other manufacturers, but so far only HIS has announced its readiness to supply its devices and is trying to keep the price at an acceptably low level.
Finally, I must admit that the HD 5670 exceeded my expectations — performance in games at a resolution of 1680 x 1050 is very decent. However, for better visual experiences at this resolution, a little more power doesn’t hurt. A bit more performance and a $95 price tag would make this an absolute «Best Buy» model in this price range.
The dual HD 5670 solution in CrossFire is getting really interesting. The only problem is the change in pricing strategy, due to the lack of competition, as a result of which the HD 5670 is positioned differently than its predecessors. Thus, the emphasis is on DX 11, Eyefinity and HD playback adding value to the product, while gaming performance is maintained at the level of the Radeon HD 4850, positioned by the manufacturer at a MSRP of $119. Thus, AMD offers a new level of technology with gaming performance of an old repositioned product. I personally can’t be thankful for the price increase for the X650 class product, but I must admit that it’s a more elegant solution than the constant rebranding practiced by some manufacturers.
We can conclude that AMD now has a full range of products from $100 to $770 and won the competition for the entry-level segment as well. Of course, by launching its new competing product, the “green camp” will unleash a new price war that will create the price pressure we need so much and allow us to get better prices than now.
Well, while very cheap solutions are being prepared for release, the HD 5670 remains the cheapest product with DX 11 support on the market.
RADEON GRAPHICS BLIMP MOD — GTA5-Mods.com
Download
Nicolas Domenic
All Versions
1.0 (current)
145 downloads, 2.3 MB
October 14, 2017
- Loading
- Max Payne
- Rockstar Games
Max Payne Loading Theme For GTA V
2.0
By Nicolas Domenic
- Loading
Indiana Jones Charging Theme
1.0
By Nicolas Domenic
- Loading
Psycho Loading Theme
2.0
By Nicolas Domenic
- Trevor
- Clothing
- Skins
Trevor Maid Dress
1.0
By Nicolas Domenic
- Other textures
Argentina banknotes. / Billetes Argentinos.
1.0
By NicolasDomenic
5.
0 / 5 stars (1 vote)
The radeon textures for gta blimp
path in the readme
UPDATE: I cant release the update 1.1 because i’m very occupied with other topics, Thanks For supporting Me
Show Full Description
First boot:
October 14, 2017
Last update:
October 15, 2017
Last download:
May 29, 2023
All Versions
1.0 (current)
145 downloads, 2.3 MB
October 14, 2017
- Loading
- Max Payne
- Rockstar Games
Max Payne Loading Theme For GTA V
2.0
By Nicolas Domenic
- Loading
Indiana Jones Charging Theme
1.0
By Nicolas Domenic
- Loading
Psycho Loading Theme
2.