Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/radeon-pro-vega-20-vs-geforce-rtx-2080%23general-info
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce RTX
2060
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
Popular graphics cards
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
4090
Radeon RX
Vega 7
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1650
Radeon RX
580
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Core i5
1135G7
vs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
EPYC
7h22
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
3500U
Ryzen 3
5300U
Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/radeon-pro-vega-20-vs-geforce-rtx-2080%23characteristics
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce RTX
2060
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
Popular graphics cards
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
4090
Radeon RX
Vega 7
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1650
Radeon RX
580
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Core i5
1135G7
vs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
EPYC
7h22
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
3500U
Ryzen 3
5300U
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 video cards by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory.
Video card performance analysis by benchmarks: 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
versus
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
Benefits
Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
- Newer graphics card, 2 year(s) 7 month(s) 902 core frequency difference
- % more: 1365 MHz vs 1138 MHz
- Boost core clock 25% more: 1560 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Texturing speed in 990. 4 times bigger: 299.5 GTexel/s vs 302.4 GTexel / s
- Newer GPU manufacturing process allows for more powerful graphics card but lower power consumption: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- About 40% less power consumption: 150 Watt vs 210 Watt
- 11% more memory clock: 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1572 MHz
- Performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) about 58% more: 20291 vs 12822
- GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen performance (Fps) about 58% higher: 20291 vs 12822
Release date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 14 August 2017 |
Core frequency | 1365 MHz vs 1138 MHz |
Boost core clock | 1560 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Texturing speed | 299.5 GTexel/s vs 302. 4 GTexel/s |
Process | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 210 Watt |
Memory frequency | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1572 MHz |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 vs 12822 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 vs 12822 |
Reasons to choose AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
- 17% more shader processors: 3584 vs 3072
- About 2% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames): 3709 vs 3652
- Performance in GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames) 57.8x more: 3353 vs 58
- Performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T- Rex (Fps) 57.8 times bigger: 3353 vs 58
4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) about 2% more: 3709 vs 3652
Number of shaders | 3584 vs 3072 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 58 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 58 |
Benchmark comparison
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|||
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|||
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|||
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|||
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) |
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 10649 | |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 | 12822 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 | 12822 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 58 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 58 | 3353 |
PassMark — G3D Mark | 12564 | |
PassMark — G2D Mark | 814 | |
Geekbench — OpenCL | 60993 | |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 153.117 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1722.138 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.901 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 126.528 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1172.788 |
Performance comparison
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 | |
---|---|---|
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5. 0 |
Codename | TU104 | Vega 10 |
Production date | 2 Apr 2020 | 14 August 2017 |
Place in the ranking | 138 | 134 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Price at first issue date | $399 | |
Boost core clock | 1560 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Core frequency | 1365 MHz | 1138MHz |
Process | 12nm | 14nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 299. 5GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.585TFLOPS | |
Number of shaders | 3072 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
Texturing speed | 299.5 GTexel/s | 302.4 GTexel/s |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 210 Watt |
Number of transistors | 13600 million | 12,500 million |
Floating point performance | 9. 677 gflops | |
Video connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Additional power connectors | None | None |
Width | Dual slot | |
Length | 267mm | |
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4. 6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulcan | ||
Maximum memory size | 8GB | 8GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 402.4 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory frequency | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 1572 MHz |
Memory type |