Page not found
Page not found
We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/geforce-820m-vs-radeon-r4-graphics%23characteristics
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
Radeon RX
580
Radeon RX
Vega 7
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce GTX
1650
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5500
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Popular CPUs
EPYC
9654
Ryzen 5
5500U
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
12400F
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
3600
Page not found
Page not found
We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/geforce-820m-vs-radeon-r4-graphics%23memory-specs
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
Radeon RX
580
Radeon RX
Vega 7
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce GTX
1650
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5500
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Popular CPUs
EPYC
9654
Ryzen 5
5500U
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
12400F
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
3600
Compare NVIDIA GeForce 820M and AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 820M and AMD Radeon R4 Graphics video cards by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory, Technology support.
Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T -Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.
NVIDIA GeForce 820M
versus
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Benefits
Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce 820M
- Newer graphics card, release date difference 9 month(s)
- Core clock about 1% more: 810 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 56% faster texturing speed: 10 GTexel / s vs 6.
4 GTexel / s
- 17% faster floating point performance: 240.0 gflops vs 204.8 gflops
- Approximately 54% improvement in PassMark — G3D Mark benchmark: 507 vs 330
- Approximately 15% improvement in PassMark — G2D Mark benchmark: 114 vs 99 pixels/ s) about 64% more: 7.765 vs 4.721
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) about 50% more: 161.305 vs 107.613
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T- rex( Frames/s) about 54% more: 0.686 vs 0.445
- CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) about 34% better performance: 14.257 vs 10.612 097
- Performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) about 70% better: 1195 vs 701
- Performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) about 8% better: 1447 vs 1338
- About 85% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) benchmark: 3349 vs 1811
- About 70% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1195 vs 701
- About 85% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) benchmark: 3349 vs 1811
900 19 Productivity in about 8% more performance in GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps) benchmark: 1447 vs 1338
Issue date | 21 March 2015 vs 11 June 2014 |
Core frequency | 810 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Texturing speed | 10 GTexel/s vs 6.4 GTexel/s |
Floating point performance | 240.0 gflops vs 204.8 gflops |
PassMark — G3D Mark | 507 vs 330 |
PassMark — G2D Mark | 114 vs 99 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.![]() |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.305 vs 107.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.686 vs 0.445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.257 vs 10.612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.768 vs 13.097 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1195 vs 701 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 1447 vs 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 1811 |
GFXBench 4.![]() |
1195 vs 701 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 1447 vs 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 1811 |
Reasons to choose AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
- 33% more shader processors: 128 vs 96
- 3 times less power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
- Benchmark performance e Geekbench — OpenCL 3.1 times(a ) more: 8386 vs 2684
Number of shaders | 128 vs 96 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Geekbench — OpenCL | 8386 vs 2684 |
Benchmark comparison
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 820M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
PassMark — G3D Mark |
|
|||||
PassMark — G2D Mark |
|
|||||
Geekbench — OpenCL |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1.![]() |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1.![]() |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|||||
GFXBench 4.![]() |
|
|||||
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|||||
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|||||
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|||||
GFXBench 4.![]() |
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 820M | AMD Radeon R4 Graphics |
---|---|---|
PassMark — G3D Mark | 507 | 330 |
PassMark — G2D Mark | 114 | 99 |
Geekbench — OpenCL | 2684 | 8386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.![]() |
4.721 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.305 | 107.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.686 | 0.445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.257 | 10.612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.768 | 13.097 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1195 | 701 |
GFXBench 4.![]() |
1447 | 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 1811 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1195 | 701 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 1447 | 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 1811 |
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 847 |
Performance comparison
NVIDIA GeForce 820M | AMD Radeon R4 Graphics | |
---|---|---|
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 2.![]() |
Codename | GK107 | Beema |
Production date | 21 March 2015 | 11 June 2014 |
Place in the ranking | 1429 | 1493 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Core frequency | 810MHz | 800 MHz |
Floating point performance | 240.0 gflops | 204.8 gflops |
Process | 28nm | 28nm |
Number of shaders | 96 | 128 |
Texturing speed | 10 GTexel/s | 6.![]() |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 15 Watt |
Number of transistors | 1,270 million | 930 million |
Video connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Tire | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.![]() |
4.5 |
Maximum memory size | 1GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory frequency | 1802 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | System Shared |
Shared memory | 0 | |
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers |
Apple M1 vs Intel Core i5+8400: What is the difference?
67points
Apple M1
44points
Intel Core i5+8400
2 Comparison winner
€ 584
vs
61 facts in comparison
Apple M1
Intel Core i5+8400
Why is Apple M1 better than Intel Core i5+8400?
- 23.
81% higher CPU speed?
4 x 3.2GHz & 4 x 2GHz vs 6 x 2.8GHz - 1600MHz higher RAM speed?
4266MHz vs 2666MHz - 2 more CPU threads?
8 vs 6 - Are 9nm smaller semiconductors?
5nm vs 14nm - 51.2W below TDP?
13.8W vs 65W - 10.5MB more L2 cache?
12MB vs 1.5MB - 1.63x higher PassMark score?
15127 vs 9253 - 1.25MB/core more L2 cache per core?
1.5MB/core vs 0.25MB/core
Why is Intel Core i5+8400 better than Apple M1?
- 0.8GHz higher turbo clock speed?
4GHz vs 3.2GHz - 192KB more L1 cache?
384KB vs 192KB - 48GB more max memory?
64GB vs 16GB - Has AES?
- Uses multithreading?
- Supports 1 more displays?
3 vs.2
Apple M1
vs.
002 vs
Intel Core i7-3770
Apple M1
vs
Intel Core i7-12700K
Intel Core i5+8400
vs
Intel Core i3-9100F
Apple M1
vs
Intel Core i7- 1065G7
Intel Core i5+8400
vs
Intel Core i3-10100
Apple M1
vs
Intel Core i5-12500H
9 0002 Intel Core i5+8400
vs
Intel Core i7-4770
Apple M1
vs
Intel Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i5+8400
vs
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
Apple M1
vs
Intel Core i7-9750H
Intel Core i5+8400
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
Apple M1
vs
Intel Core i3-1005G1
Intel Core i5+8400
vs
Intel Core i7-6700
Apple M1
vs
Intel Core i5- 13500H
Intel Core i5+8400
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Apple M1
vs
Intel Core i9-9880H
Intel Core i5 +8400
vs
Intel Core i5-10400
Apple M1
vs
Intel Core i9-9980HK
Intel Core i5+8400
vs
Intel Core i7-7700
Price Comparison
Intel Core i5+8400
Buy used:
€67
Product | Shop | Price | |
---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-8400, 6C/6T, 2.![]() |
€584 |
User reviews
Overall rating
Apple M1
7 User reviews
Apple M1
9.0 /10
7 User reviews
Intel Core i5+8400
4 User reviews
Intel Core i5+8400
7.3 /10
4 User reviews
Features
9000 2 Value for money
8.7 /10
7 votes
7.5 /10
4 votes
Games 191 7.3 /10
4 votes
Productivity
9 9.1 /10
7 votes
8.0 /10
4 votes
Reliability
9 .3 /10
7 votes
7.8 /10
4 votes
Energy efficiency
9.1 /10
7 votes
7.3 /10
4 votes
Performance
cpu speed 900 03
4 x 3.2GHz & 4 x 2GHz
6 x 2. 8GHz
CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second the processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
turbo clock speed
3.2GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
Has an unlocked multiplier
✖Apple M1
✖Intel Core i5+8400
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.
L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L3 cache
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Apple M1)
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L2 core
1.5MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
L3 core
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Apple M1)
1.5MB/core
More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Geotagging
PassMark result
This benchmark measures CPU performance using multithreading.
PassMark result (single)
This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Apple M1)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Apple M1)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)
Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)
Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Apple M1)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Apple M1)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)
The Blender benchmark (classroom) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
performance per watt
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Apple M1)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)
This means that the processor is more efficient, resulting in more performance per watt of power used.
Integrated graphics
GPU clock speed
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Apple M1)
350MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
Turbo GPU
1278MHz
1050MHz
When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
GPU actuators
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)
A graphics processing unit (GPU) with more execution units can provide better graphics.
monitor support
By using multiple displays, you can increase your workspace, making it easier to work across multiple applications.
DirectX version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Apple M1)
DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.
OpenGL version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Apple M1)
The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.
OpenCL version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Apple M1)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)
Some applications use OpenCL to use the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.
texture units (TMUs)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)
TMUs take texture units and map them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.
imaging units ROPs
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)
ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.
Memory
RAM speed
4266MHz
2666MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
maximum memory bandwidth
68.25GB/s
41.6GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of main memory. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
maximum memory
Maximum memory (RAM).
bus baud rate
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Apple M1)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
Supports memory recovery code
✖Apple M1
✖Intel Core i5+8400
Memory error recovery code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Apple M1)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)
The newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Apple M1)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Functions
instruction sets
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Apple M1)
SSE 4.2, SSE 4.1, AVX, AES, FMA3, F16C, MMX
Instruction sets are sets of codes that the CPU executes for certain functions.
uses multithreading
✖Apple M1
✔Intel Core i5+8400
known as streams. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Apple M1)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
Has TrustZone
✔Apple M1
✖Intel Core i5+8400
Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and digital rights management (DRM) video streaming.
interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)
Processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better
Has NX bit
✔Apple M1
✔Intel Core i5+8400
nx bit helps protect your computer from virus attacks.