Radeon r4 vs 820m: Radeon R4 Graphics vs GeForce 820M

Page not found

Page not found









We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/geforce-820m-vs-radeon-r4-graphics%23characteristics

Popular graphics cards comparisons



GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs



GeForce RTX
3060




GeForce RTX
2060 Super

vs



GeForce RTX
3060




GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs



GeForce RTX
3070




GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB

vs



Radeon RX
580




GeForce GTX
1660 Super

vs



GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB




GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

vs



GeForce GTX
1650

Popular graphics cards



GeForce RTX
4090




Radeon RX
580




Radeon RX
Vega 7




GeForce GTX
1050 Ti




GeForce GTX
1660 Super




GeForce GTX
1650

Popular CPU comparisons



Ryzen 5
5600X

vs



Core i5
12400F




Core i5
10400F

vs



Core i3
12100F




Ryzen 5
3600

vs



Ryzen 5
5500




Ryzen 5
3600

vs



Core i5
10400F




Ryzen 5
3600

vs



Core i3
12100F




Ryzen 5
3600

vs



Ryzen 5
5600X

Popular CPUs



EPYC
9654




Ryzen 5
5500U




Core i3
1115G4




Core i5
12400F




Core i5
1135G7




Ryzen 5
3600








Page not found

Page not found









We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/geforce-820m-vs-radeon-r4-graphics%23memory-specs

Popular graphics cards comparisons



GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs



GeForce RTX
3060




GeForce RTX
2060 Super

vs



GeForce RTX
3060




GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs



GeForce RTX
3070




GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB

vs



Radeon RX
580




GeForce GTX
1660 Super

vs



GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB




GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

vs



GeForce GTX
1650

Popular graphics cards



GeForce RTX
4090




Radeon RX
580




Radeon RX
Vega 7




GeForce GTX
1050 Ti




GeForce GTX
1660 Super




GeForce GTX
1650

Popular CPU comparisons



Ryzen 5
5600X

vs



Core i5
12400F




Core i5
10400F

vs



Core i3
12100F




Ryzen 5
3600

vs



Ryzen 5
5500




Ryzen 5
3600

vs



Core i5
10400F




Ryzen 5
3600

vs



Core i3
12100F




Ryzen 5
3600

vs



Ryzen 5
5600X

Popular CPUs



EPYC
9654




Ryzen 5
5500U




Core i3
1115G4




Core i5
12400F




Core i5
1135G7




Ryzen 5
3600








Compare NVIDIA GeForce 820M and AMD Radeon R4 Graphics

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 820M and AMD Radeon R4 Graphics video cards by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory, Technology support.
Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T -Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce 820M

versus

AMD Radeon R4 Graphics

Benefits

Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce 820M

  • Newer graphics card, release date difference 9 month(s)
  • Core clock about 1% more: 810 MHz vs 800 MHz
  • 56% faster texturing speed: 10 GTexel / s vs 6. 4 GTexel / s
  • 17% faster floating point performance: 240.0 gflops vs 204.8 gflops
  • Approximately 54% improvement in PassMark — G3D Mark benchmark: 507 vs 330
  • Approximately 15% improvement in PassMark — G2D Mark benchmark: 114 vs 99 pixels/ s) about 64% more: 7.765 vs 4.721
  • Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) about 50% more: 161.305 vs 107.613
  • Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T- rex( Frames/s) about 54% more: 0.686 vs 0.445
  • CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) about 34% better performance: 14.257 vs 10.612 097
  • Performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) about 70% better: 1195 vs 701
  • Performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) about 8% better: 1447 vs 1338
  • About 85% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) benchmark: 3349 vs 1811
  • About 70% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1195 vs 701
  • 900 19 Productivity in about 8% more performance in GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps) benchmark: 1447 vs 1338

  • About 85% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) benchmark: 3349 vs 1811
9 0056

Issue date 21 March 2015 vs 11 June 2014
Core frequency 810 MHz vs 800 MHz
Texturing speed 10 GTexel/s vs 6.4 GTexel/s
Floating point performance 240.0 gflops vs 204.8 gflops
PassMark — G3D Mark 507 vs 330
PassMark — G2D Mark 114 vs 99
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 7. 765 vs 4.721
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 161.305 vs 107.613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.686 vs 0.445
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 14.257 vs 10.612
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 22.768 vs 13.097
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1195 vs 701
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 1447 vs 1338
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3349 vs 1811
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1195 vs 701
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 1447 vs 1338
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3349 vs 1811

Reasons to choose AMD Radeon R4 Graphics

  • 33% more shader processors: 128 vs 96
  • 3 times less power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
  • Benchmark performance e Geekbench — OpenCL 3.1 times(a ) more: 8386 vs 2684
Number of shaders 128 vs 96
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
Geekbench — OpenCL 8386 vs 2684

Benchmark comparison

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 820M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R4 Graphics

PassMark — G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
PassMark — G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
Geekbench — OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
161.305
107.613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14.257
10.612
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
22.768
13.097
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
Name NVIDIA GeForce 820M AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
PassMark — G3D Mark 507 330
PassMark — G2D Mark 114 99
Geekbench — OpenCL 2684 8386
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 7. 765 4.721
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 161.305 107.613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.686 0.445
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 14.257 10.612
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 22.768 13.097
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1195 701
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) 1447 1338
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3349 1811
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1195 701
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 1447 1338
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3349 1811
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score 847

Performance comparison

NVIDIA GeForce 820M AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Architecture Kepler GCN 2. 0
Codename GK107 Beema
Production date 21 March 2015 11 June 2014
Place in the ranking 1429 1493
Type Laptop Desktop
Core frequency 810MHz 800 MHz
Floating point performance 240.0 gflops 204.8 gflops
Process 28nm 28nm
Number of shaders 96 128
Texturing speed 10 GTexel/s 6. 4 GTexel/s
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 15 Watt
Number of transistors 1,270 million 930 million
Video connectors No outputs No outputs
Tire PCI Express 2.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 IGP
DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL 4. 5 4.5
Maximum memory size 1GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4GB/s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory frequency 1802 MHz
Memory type DDR3 System Shared
Shared memory 0
CUDA
GameWorks
GPU Boost
Optimus
Verde Drivers

Apple M1 vs Intel Core i5+8400: What is the difference?

67points

Apple M1

44points

Intel Core i5+8400

2 Comparison winner

584

vs

61 facts in comparison

Apple M1

Intel Core i5+8400

Why is Apple M1 better than Intel Core i5+8400?

  • 23. 81% higher CPU speed?
    4 x 3.2GHz & 4 x 2GHz vs 6 x 2.8GHz
  • 1600MHz higher RAM speed?
    4266MHz vs 2666MHz
  • 2 more CPU threads?
    8 vs 6
  • Are 9nm smaller semiconductors?
    5nm vs 14nm
  • 51.2W below TDP?
    13.8W vs 65W
  • 10.5MB more L2 cache?
    12MB vs 1.5MB
  • 1.63x higher PassMark score?
    15127 vs 9253
  • 1.25MB/core more L2 cache per core?
    1.5MB/core vs 0.25MB/core

Why is Intel Core i5+8400 better than Apple M1?

  • 0.8GHz higher turbo clock speed?
    4GHz vs 3.2GHz
  • 192KB more L1 cache?
    384KB vs 192KB
  • 48GB more max memory?
    64GB vs 16GB
  • Has AES?
  • Uses multithreading?
  • Supports 1 more displays?
    3 vs. 2

Apple M1

vs.

002 vs

Intel Core i7-3770

Apple M1

vs

Intel Core i7-12700K

Intel Core i5+8400

vs

Intel Core i3-9100F

Apple M1

vs

Intel Core i7- 1065G7

Intel Core i5+8400

vs

Intel Core i3-10100

Apple M1

vs

Intel Core i5-12500H

9 0002 Intel Core i5+8400

vs

Intel Core i7-4770

Apple M1

vs

Intel Core i7-11800H

Intel Core i5+8400

vs

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

Apple M1

vs

Intel Core i7-9750H

Intel Core i5+8400

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

Apple M1

vs

Intel Core i3-1005G1

Intel Core i5+8400

vs

Intel Core i7-6700

Apple M1

vs

Intel Core i5- 13500H

Intel Core i5+8400

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Apple M1

vs

Intel Core i9-9880H

Intel Core i5 +8400

vs

Intel Core i5-10400

Apple M1

vs

Intel Core i9-9980HK

Intel Core i5+8400

vs

Intel Core i7-7700

Price Comparison

Intel Core i5+8400

Buy used:

€67

Product Shop Price
Intel Core i5-8400, 6C/6T, 2. 80-4 .00GHz,…Intel Core i5-8400, 6C/6T, 2.80-4.00 GHz, boxed (BX80684I58400) €584

User reviews

Overall rating

Apple M1

7 User reviews

Apple M1

9.0 /10

7 User reviews

Intel Core i5+8400

4 User reviews

Intel Core i5+8400

7.3 /10

4 User reviews

Features

9000 2 Value for money

8.7 /10

7 votes

7.5 /10

4 votes

Games 191 7.3 /10

4 votes

Productivity

9 9.1 /10

7 votes

8.0 /10

4 votes

Reliability

9 .3 /10

7 votes

7.8 /10

4 votes

Energy efficiency

9.1 /10

7 votes

7.3 /10

4 votes

Performance

cpu speed 900 03

4 x 3.2GHz & 4 x 2GHz

6 x 2. 8GHz

CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second the processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.

processor thread

More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.

turbo clock speed

3.2GHz

When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

Has an unlocked multiplier

✖Apple M1

✖Intel Core i5+8400

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.

L2 Cache

More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

L3 cache

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Apple M1)

More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

L1 cache

More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

L2 core

1.5MB/core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

L3 core

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Apple M1)

1.5MB/core

More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

Geotagging

PassMark result

This benchmark measures CPU performance using multithreading.

PassMark result (single)

This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.

Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Apple M1)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.

Cinebench R20 result (single core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Apple M1)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)

Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.

Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)

Geekbench 5 result (single core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)

Blender test result (bmw27)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Apple M1)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)

The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

Blender (classroom) result

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Apple M1)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)

The Blender benchmark (classroom) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

performance per watt

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Apple M1)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)

This means that the processor is more efficient, resulting in more performance per watt of power used.

Integrated graphics

GPU clock speed

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Apple M1)

350MHz

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

Turbo GPU

1278MHz

1050MHz

When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

GPU actuators

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)

A graphics processing unit (GPU) with more execution units can provide better graphics.

monitor support

By using multiple displays, you can increase your workspace, making it easier to work across multiple applications.

DirectX version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Apple M1)

DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.

OpenGL version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Apple M1)

The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.

OpenCL version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Apple M1)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)

Some applications use OpenCL to use the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.

texture units (TMUs)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)

TMUs take texture units and map them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.

imaging units ROPs

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)

ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.

Memory

RAM speed

4266MHz

2666MHz

Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.

maximum memory bandwidth

68.25GB/s

41.6GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

DDR memory version

DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of main memory. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.

memory channels

More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.

maximum memory

Maximum memory (RAM).

bus baud rate

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Apple M1)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.

Supports memory recovery code

✖Apple M1

✖Intel Core i5+8400

Memory error recovery code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

eMMC version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Apple M1)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)

The newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.

bus frequency

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Apple M1)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device

Functions

instruction sets

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Apple M1)

SSE 4.2, SSE 4.1, AVX, AES, FMA3, F16C, MMX

Instruction sets are sets of codes that the CPU executes for certain functions.

uses multithreading

✖Apple M1

✔Intel Core i5+8400

known as streams. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.

bits transmitted at the same time

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Apple M1)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)

NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.

Has TrustZone

✔Apple M1

✖Intel Core i5+8400

Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and digital rights management (DRM) video streaming.

interface width

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)

Processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better

Has NX bit

✔Apple M1

✔Intel Core i5+8400

nx bit helps protect your computer from virus attacks.