Radeon r5 m440: AMD Radeon R7 M440 — Benchmarks and Specs

AMD Radeon R5 Graphics vs AMD Radeon R7 M440

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 Graphics and AMD Radeon R7 M440 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark.

AMD Radeon R5 Graphics

Buy on Amazon

vs

AMD Radeon R7 M440

Buy on Amazon

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M440

• 5. 1x more core clock speed: 1021 MHz vs 200 MHz
• Around 68% higher texture fill rate: 20.42 GTexel / s vs 12.13 GTexel / s
• Around 25% higher pipelines: 320 vs 256
• Around 68% better floating-point performance: 653.4 gflops vs 388.1 gflops
• Around 83% better performance in Geekbench — OpenCL: 5598 vs 3054
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1935 vs 966
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames): 2067 vs 1363
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames): 2537 vs 1915
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1935 vs 966
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps): 2067 vs 1363
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps): 2537 vs 1915

Core clock speed	1021 MHz vs 200 MHz
Texture fill rate	20. 42 GTexel / s vs 12.13 GTexel / s
Pipelines	320 vs 256
Floating-point performance	653.4 gflops vs 388.1 gflops
Geekbench — OpenCL	5598 vs 3054
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1935 vs 966
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames)	2067 vs 1363
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	2537 vs 1915
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1935 vs 966
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps)	2067 vs 1363
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	2537 vs 1915

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M440

Geekbench — OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2

Name	AMD Radeon R5 Graphics	AMD Radeon R7 M440
Geekbench — OpenCL	3054	5598
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	6.331
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	119.568
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.543
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	12.649
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	42.459
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	966	1935
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)	1363	2067
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	1915	2537
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	966	1935
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)	1363	2067
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	1915	2537
PassMark — G3D Mark		867
PassMark — G2D Mark		175

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R5 Graphics	AMD Radeon R7 M440
Architecture	GCN 3. 0	GCN 3.0
Code name	Wani	Meso
Launch date	31 May 2016	15 May 2016
Place in performance rating	1442	1050
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Boost clock speed	800 MHz
Core clock speed	200 MHz	1021 MHz
Floating-point performance	388. 1 gflops	653.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	256	320
Texture fill rate	12.13 GTexel / s	20.42 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt
Transistor count	2,410 million	3,100 million
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Interface	IGP	PCIe 3. 0 x8
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Vulkan
Memory type	System Shared	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount		4 GB
Memory bandwidth		16 GB / s
Memory bus width		64 Bit
Memory clock speed		2000 MHz
Shared memory		0

Navigation

Choose a GPU

Compare videocards

Compare AMD Radeon R5 Graphics with others

AMD
Radeon R5 Graphics



vs



NVIDIA
GeForce 7050 PV + nForce 630a




AMD
Radeon R5 Graphics



vs



NVIDIA
GeForce 8600 GTS




AMD
Radeon R5 Graphics



vs



NVIDIA
GeForce 410M




AMD
Radeon R5 Graphics



vs



NVIDIA
NVS 315




AMD
Radeon R5 Graphics



vs



NVIDIA
GeForce GT 705 OEM




AMD
Radeon R5 Graphics



vs



Intel
UHD Graphics 600

AMD Radeon R5 M430 vs AMD Radeon R7 M440

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M430 and AMD Radeon R7 M440 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies.
Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon R5 M430

Buy on Amazon

vs

AMD Radeon R7 M440

Buy on Amazon

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M430

• Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 1021 MHz
• Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 20. 6 GTexel / s vs 20.42 GTexel / s
• Around 1% better floating-point performance: 659.2 gflops vs 653.4 gflops
• 2.9x better performance in PassMark — G2D Mark: 516 vs 175

Core clock speed	1030 MHz vs 1021 MHz
Texture fill rate	20.6 GTexel / s vs 20.42 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	659.2 gflops vs 653.4 gflops
PassMark — G2D Mark	516 vs 175

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M440

• Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 34% better performance in PassMark — G3D Mark: 867 vs 649
• Around 6% better performance in Geekbench — OpenCL: 5598 vs 5305
• Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1935 vs 1087
• Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames): 2067 vs 1157
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames): 2537 vs 2212
• Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1935 vs 1087
• Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps): 2067 vs 1157
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps): 2537 vs 2212

Memory clock speed	2000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
PassMark — G3D Mark	867 vs 649
Geekbench — OpenCL	5598 vs 5305
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1935 vs 1087
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)	2067 vs 1157
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	2537 vs 2212
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1935 vs 1087
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)	2067 vs 1157
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	2537 vs 2212

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M430
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M440

PassMark — G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2
PassMark — G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2
Geekbench — OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2

Name	AMD Radeon R5 M430	AMD Radeon R7 M440
PassMark — G3D Mark	649	867
PassMark — G2D Mark	516	175
Geekbench — OpenCL	5305	5598
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	13.812
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	144.604
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.981
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	18.55
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	65.872
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1087	1935
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)	1157	2067
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	2212	2537
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1087	1935
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)	1157	2067
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	2212	2537

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R5 M430	AMD Radeon R7 M440
Architecture	GCN 1. 0	GCN 3.0
Code name	Exo	Meso
Launch date	15 May 2016	15 May 2016
Place in performance rating	1049	1050
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Boost clock speed	855 MHz
Core clock speed	1030 MHz	1021 MHz
Floating-point performance	659. 2 gflops	653.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	320	320
Texture fill rate	20.6 GTexel / s	20.42 GTexel / s
Transistor count	1,040 million	3,100 million
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3. 0 x8
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Vulkan
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB / s	16 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	DDR3
Shared memory	0	0
DirectCompute 5. 0

AMD Radeon R7 M440 graphics card

AMD Radeon R7 M440 graphics card — specifications, tests, reviews

Video card memory size: 4096 MB;

Video memory type: DDR3;

GPU clock: 1.021 MHz.

Features AMD Radeon R7 M440

GPU

GPU manufacturer	AMD
GPU name	Meso
Platform	Laptop
Clock frequency	1.021 MHz
Turbo clock speed	855MHz
Two processors	No
Reference card	No

Performance

nine0024 653.4 GFLOPS

Number of shader units	320
Number of texture units (TMU)	20
Number of ROPs	8
Computer units	5
Pixel fill rate	8. 17 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate	20.42 GTexel/s
Number of floating point operations (FLOPS)

Memory

Memory clock	1.000 MHz
Effective memory frequency	2.000 MHz
Memory bus width	64bit
Video memory size	4.096 MB
Memory type	DDR3
Memory bandwidth	16 GB/s

Benchmarks Radeon R7 M440

PassMark

Radeon R7 M440	932
GeForce 940MX	1.225
GeForce 940M	952

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0)

Radeon R7 M440	3,361.46
GeForce 940MX	3,360.1
GeForce 940M	3,362. 34

Manhattan test (GFXBench 3.0)

Radeon R7 M440	1,736.26
GeForce 940M	3.714.04
GeForce 940MX	3,713.28

Battlefield 4

Radeon R7 M440	8.1
GeForce 940M	11.9
GeForce 940MX	11.9

Bioshock Infinite

Radeon R7 M440	11.4
GeForce 940MX	15.3
GeForce 940M	14.4

Crysis 3

Radeon R7 M440	4.8
GeForce 940M	7.15
GeForce 940MX	6.95

Metro: Last Light

Radeon R7 M440	6.1
GeForce 940MX	11.6
GeForce 940M	11. 05

Video reviews

Radeon R5 M420 Radeon R5 M430 Radeon R7 M440 Radeon R7 M445 gaming tests

Radeon R7 M445 2GB: mobile gameplay in two dozen popular games

902 Gaming1 AMD

Reviews of the Radeon R7 M440

At the moment it does not reach the performance of gtx 1060 3gb somewhere around 25-35%. nine0329 And more specifically, it is about 10-15% more powerful than gtx 960 4 gb, and 40% more powerful than 1050ti 4gb
.

in the built-in, a lot depends on the RAM, in fact. If we consider the ideal scenario for embedding, namely 2x16GB dual rank, sl20, 5000 MHz 128bit (dual channel), then I think in most games the embedding will show the best results or parity. But this is my humble opinion0004

the artifact problem on the R7 M445 reminded me of a wank from my RX 460 4gb asus. The essence of the artifacts was about the same: they appeared on a demanding project, but on such projects as DotA, vf, they were less common. Overclocking the PCI bus to + 50 MHz helped me, after that there were no artifacts

Tags:1.021 MHz, 4096 MB, AMD, DDR3, GPU, Radeon R7 M440

performance overview and gaming performance tests

The Radeon R7 M440 graphics card was released by AMD, release date: 15 May 2016. The graphics card is designed for laptop computers and is based on the GCN 3.0 architecture, codenamed Meso. nine0004

Core frequency — 1021 MHz. Texturing speed — 20.42 GTexel / s. Number of shader processors — 320. Floating point performance — 653.4 gflops. Technological process — 28 nm. The number of transistors is 3,100 million.

Memory type: DDR3. The maximum memory size is 4 GB. Memory bus width — 64 Bit. Memory frequency — 2000 MHz. The memory bandwidth is 16 GB / s. Shared memory — 0.

Benchmarks

PassMark G3D Mark	Top 1 GPU This GPU
PassMark G2D Mark	Top 1 GPU This GPU
GFXBench 4.0 Car Chase Offscreen	Top 1 GPU This GPU	nine0019
34770 Frames

1935 Frames

GFXBench 4. 0
Car Chase Offscreen

Top 1 GPU

This GPU

nine0019

34770.000 Fps

1935.000 Fps

GFXBench 4.0
Manhattan

Top 1 GPU

This GPU

nine0019

27823 Frames

2067 Frames

GFXBench 4.0
Manhattan

Top 1 GPU

This GPU

nine0019

27823. 000 Fps

2067.000 Fps

GFXBench 4.0
T-Rex

Top 1 GPU

This GPU

nine0019

69225 Frames

2537 Frames

GFXBench 4.0
T-Rex

Top 1 GPU

This GPU

nine0019

69225.000 Fps

2537. 000 Fps

Geekbench
OpenCL

Top 1 GPU

This GPU

nine0019

237214

nine0024 2067.000 Fps

Name	Meaning
PassMark — G3D Mark	867
PassMark — G2D Mark	175
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen	1935 Frames
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen	1935. 000 Fps
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan	2067 Frames
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex	2537 Frames
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex	2537.000 Fps
Geekbench — OpenCL	5598

Gaming performance

1. Ark Survival Evolved (2017)
2. Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017)
3. Team Fortress 2 (2017)
4 Resident Evil 7 (2017)
5. Dishonored 2 (2016)
6. Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (2016)
7. Titanfall 2 (2016)
8. Farming Simulator 17 (2016)
9 Civilization VI (2016)
10. Battlefield 1 (2016)
11 Mafia 3 (2016)
12. Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016)
13 Overwatch (2016)
14. Doom (2016)
15. The Division (2016)
16. Far Cry Primal (2016)

17. XCOM 2 (2016)
18 Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)
19 Rainbow Six Siege (2015)
20 Star Wars Battlefront (2015)
21. Fallout 4 (2015)
22. Anno 2205 (2015)
23. World of Warships (2015)
24. Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
25. The Witcher 3 (2015)
26. Dirt Rally (2015)
27. GTA V (2015)
28 Sims 4 (2014)
29. Battlefield 4 (2013)
30. Metro: Last Light (2013)
31 BioShock Infinite (2013)
32. Crysis 3 (2013)
33. Diablo III (2012)

Ark Survival Evolved (2017)

Low, 1280×720

15.80

Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017)

Low, 1280×720	22.00024 42.90
High, 1920×1080	45. 20
Ultra, 1920×1080	11.50
4K, 3820×2160	11.50

Resident Evil 7 (2017)

Low, 1280×720	40.60
Medium, 1920×1080	15.90

Dishonored 2 (2016)

9000

LOW, 1280×720
Medium, 1366×768	9.20

Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (2016)

Low, 1280×720	26.40
Medium, 1366×768	22.60
High , 1920×1080	12.10

Titanfall 2 (2016)

900 29.80

Low, 1280×720	41.10
Medium, 1366×768
High, 1920×1080	11.20

Farming Simulator 17 (2016)

Low, 1280×720	69. 70
Medium, 1366×768	59.30
High, 1920×1080	21.10

Civilization VI (2016)

Low, 1024×768	36.40
Medium, 13666×768
High, 1920×1080	9.50

Battlefield 1 (2016)

Low, 1280×720	31.80
Medium, 1366×768	22.70
High, 1920×1080	9.60
Ultra, 1920×1080	9.60

Mafia 3 (2016)

Low, 1280×720

140024 Medium, 1366×768

8.90

Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016)

Low, 1280×720	13.90
Medium, 1366×768	10.10
High, 1920×1080	5. 20

Overwatch (2016)

900 HIIT20x1080

Low, 1280×720	60.50.5025
Medium, 1366×768	42.60
22.30
Ultra, 1920×1080	12.40

Doom (2016)

Low, 1280×720	22.00
Medium, 1366×768	13.00
High, 1920×1080	8.10

The Division (2016)

9.60

Low, 1280×720	23.10
Medium, 1366×768
High, 1920×1080	6.20

Far Cry Primal (2016)

Low, 1280×720	20.60
Medium, 1920×1080	9.90
High, 1920×1080	8.90

xcom 2 (2016)

Low, 1280×720	22. 80
Medium, 1920×1080	7.90
High, 1920×1080	5.20
Ultra, 1920×1080	4.90

Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)

Low, 1024×768	22.25
Medium, 1366×768	12.00024 Low, 1024×768	54.00
Medium, 1366×768	42.90
High, 1920×1080	26.90
Ultra, 1920×1080	20.30

Star Wars Battlefront (2015)

LOW, 1024×768	25.60
Medium, 1366×768	18.60
HIGH, 1920×1080	900

Fallout 4 (2015)

Low, 1280×720	25.60
Medium, 1366×768	15. 80
High, 1920×1080	8.30

Anno 2205 (2015)

Low, 1024×768	35.30
Medium, 1366×768	17.10
High, 1920×1080	7.00

World of Warships (2015)

Low, 1366×768	52.60
Medium, 1366×768	43.80
High, 1920×1080	22.70

Dota 2 Reborn (2015)

Low, 1280×720	49.50
HIGH, 1920×1080	22.52.5025
Ultra, 1920×1080	21.00

the Witcher 3 (2015) 9 (2015) 9 (2015)

0019

Low, 1024×768 21.30 Medium, 1366×768 13.65 High, 1920×1080 7. 10

Dirt Rally (2015)

Low, 1024×768	93.40
Medium, 1366×768	36.40
High, 1920×1080	18.90
Ultra, 1920×1080

GTA V (2015)

Low, 1024×768	50.70
Medium, 1366×768	43.70
High, 1920×1080	12.20

Sims 4 (2014)

Low, 1024×768	81.90
Medium, 1366×768	40.40
High, 1920×1080	19.90
Ultra, 1920×1080	16.20

Battlefield 4 (2013)

Low, 1024×768	51.40
Medium, 1366×768	37.20
High, 1366×768	23. 50
Ultra, 1920×1080	7.85

Metro: Last Light (2013)

Low, 1024×768	32.70
Medium, 13666×760024 25.60
High, 1366×768	14.10
Ultra, 1920×1080	6.10

BioShock Infinite (2013)

Low, 1280×720	74.15
Medium, 1366×768	42.40
High, 1366×768	33.15
Ultra, 1920×1080	10.50

Crysis 3 (2013)

(2013)

(2013)

(2013)

(2013)

(2013)0019

Low, 1024×768 29.00 Medium, 1366×768 18.00 High, 1366×768 12.80 Ultra, 1920×1080 4.80

Diablo III (2012)

Low, 1024×768	58. 70
Medium, 1366×768	52.00
HIIIH, 1366×768	45.70
Ultra, 1920×1080	27.80

Features

nine0024 1050

Architecture	GCN 3.0
Codename	Meso
Production date	15 May 2016
Place in the ranking
Type	Laptop
Core frequency	1021MHz
Floating point performance	653.4 gflops
Process	28 nm
Number of shaders	320
Texturing speed	20.