Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/geforce-gtx-1050-ti-vs-radeon-rx-vega-11%23crypto-mining
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
3070
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i3
12100F
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Ryzen 5
5600X
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
12400F
Core i3
12100F
EPYC
7h22
Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/geforce-gtx-1050-ti-vs-radeon-rx-vega-11%23gaming
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
3070
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i3
12100F
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Ryzen 5
5600X
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
12400F
Core i3
12100F
EPYC
7h22
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q comparison, which is better? AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
28% 66%
DeviceList Score
We compared AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q specs and compiled a list of benefits and comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2023.
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Benefits
|
Power Demand (TDP) |
|
65 W -10 W (-13.3%) better than vs 75 W |
Benefits NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Comparison winner
|
Number of shader processors |
|
768 64 (9.1%) better than vs 704 |
|
Boost frequency |
|
1417 MHz 177 MHz (14.3%) better than vs 1240 MHz |
| General information | |
|
Architecture |
|
| GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
|
Codename |
|
| Raven | GP107 |
|
Type |
|
| Desktop | For laptops |
|
Number of shaders |
|
| 704 | 768
64 (9. |
|
Core clock |
|
| n/a | 1151 MHz |
|
Boost frequency |
|
| 1240 MHz | 1417 MHz
177 MHz (14.3%) better than |
|
Number of transistors |
|
| 4.940 million | 3.300 million |
|
Process |
|
| 14 nm | 14 nm |
|
Interface |
|
| IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
|
Power Demand (TDP) The calculated heat output indicates the average heat dissipation in load operation, |
|
| 65W
-10 W (-13.3%) better than |
75 W |
|
Additional power connectors |
|
| no | no |
|
G-SYNC Ready NVIDIA G-SYNC technology delivers a smooth gaming experience with variable refresh rates and the elimination of visual artifacts. |
|
|
Multi Monitor |
|
| n/a | + |
|
VR Ready Technology from NVIDIA that gives manufacturers access to Multi res Shading, Context Priority and GPU Direct virtual reality technologies. |
|
| n/a | + |
|
Vulkan NVIDIA’s Vulkan technology allows developers to gain low-level access to the GPU to optimize graphics commands (better than OpenGL and Direct3D APIs). |
|
| n/a | + |
|
Multi-Projection NVIDIA’s Multi-Projection technology improves graphics performance when building virtual worlds. Images for the left and right eyes are calculated simultaneously. |
|
| n/a | + |
|
Video connectors |
|
| No outputs | No outputs |
|
DirectX |
|
| 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
|
Floating point performance |
|
1. 760 gflops |
2.177 gflops |
1%) better than 
| Benchmark |
| Memory | |
|
Memory Type |
|
| Used system | GDDR5 |
|
Maximum memory Large video memory allows you to run demanding games with lots of textures, |
|
| n/a | 4 GB |
|
Memory bus width The larger the video memory bus width, the more data is transferred to the GPU per unit of time and the better performance in demanding games. |
|
| n/a | 128 bit |
|
Shared memory |
|
| — | — |
|
Memory frequency A high memory frequency has a positive effect on the speed of a video card with a large amount of data. |
|
| n/a | 7008 MHz |
|
Memory bandwidth The higher the data transfer bandwidth, the more effective RAM the PC can use. |
|
| n/a | 112.1 |
Compare AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
Comparative analysis of video cards AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory, Technology support.
Video card performance analysis by benchmarks: 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score, PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) ), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.
5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Mobile
versus
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
Benefits
Reasons to choose AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Mobile
- Newer graphics card, release date difference 1 year(s) 344 9054 Newer The technological process of video card production allows to make it more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.1 times less power consumption: 35 Watt vs 75 Watt
| Issue date | 15 May 2018 vs 1 February 2017 |
| Process | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- 5 times faster core clock: 1493 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 30% faster core clock in Boost mode: 1620 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- 36% faster texturing speed: 77.
76 GTexel / s vs 57.2 GTexel / s - 9% more shader processors: 768 vs 704
- 36% more floating point performance: 2,488 gflops vs 1,830 gflops
- 16x more max memory: 4 GB vs 256 MB
- Performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score about 93% more: 2337 vs 1213
| Core clock | 1493 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost core clock | 1620 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
| Texturing speed | 77.76 GTexel/s vs 57.2 GTexel/s |
| Number of shader processors | 768 vs 704 |
| Floating point performance | 2.488 gflops vs 1.830 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 256 MB |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 2337 vs 1213 |
Benchmark comparison
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score |
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 1213 | 2337 |
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 5919 | |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 323 | |
| Geekbench — OpenCL | 20024 | |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
75.758 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
3687 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 |
Feature comparison
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | GCN 5. 0 |
Pascal |
| Codename | Raven | GP106B |
| Production date | 15 May 2018 | February 1, 2017 |
| Place in the ranking | 1370 | 482 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Boost core clock | 1250MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Core frequency | 300MHz | 1493 MHz |
| Floating point performance | 1. 830 gflops |
2.488 gflops |
| Process | 14nm | 16nm |
| Number of shaders | 704 | 768 |
| Texturing speed | 57.2 GTexel/s | 77.76 GTexel/s |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Number of transistors | 4,940 million | 4,400 million |
| Video connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.
|