Radeon vega 48: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 Specs

5 января, 2023

Radeon Pro Vega 48 [in 3 benchmarks]



Radeon Pro Vega 48

Buy

  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x16

  • Core clock speed 1200 MHz

  • Max video memory 8 GB

  • Memory type HBM2

  • Memory clock speed 1572 MHz

  • Maximum resolution

Summary

AMD started Radeon Pro Vega 48 sales 19 March 2019. This is GCN 5.0 architecture desktop card based on 14 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at designers. 8 GB of HBM2 memory clocked at 1.57 GHz are supplied, and together with 2048 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 402.4 GB/s.

Compatibility-wise, this is an integrated video card.

It provides good gaming and benchmark performance at


38.37%

of a leader’s which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti.


Radeon Pro
Vega 48

vs


GeForce RTX
3090 Ti

General info


Of Radeon Pro Vega 48’s architecture, market segment and release date.

Place in performance rating 119
Value for money 31.88
Architecture GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code name Vega 10
Market segment Workstation
Release date 19 March 2019 (3 years ago)
Current price $671 of 49999 (A100 SXM4)

Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.

  • 0

  • 50

  • 100

Technical specs


Radeon Pro Vega 48’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Radeon Pro Vega 48’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores 3072 of 18432 (AD102)
Core clock speed 1200 MHz of 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT)
Boost clock speed 1300 MHz of 2903 (Radeon Pro W6600)
Number of transistors 12,500 million of 14400 (GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile)
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm of 4 (GeForce RTX 4080 Ti)
Texture fill rate 249. 6 of 939.8 (h200 SXM5)

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements


Information on Radeon Pro Vega 48’s compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it’s interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Width IGP
Supplementary power connectors None

Memory


Parameters of memory installed on Radeon Pro Vega 48: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don’t have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type HBM2
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB of 128 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory bus width 2048 Bit of 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory clock speed 1572 MHz of 21000 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti)
Memory bandwidth 402. 4 GB/s of 14400 (Radeon R7 M260)

Video outputs and ports


Types and number of video connectors present on Radeon Pro Vega 48. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.

Display Connectors No outputs

API support


APIs supported by Radeon Pro Vega 48, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX 12 (12_1)
Shader Model 6.4
OpenGL 4.6
OpenCL 2.0
Vulkan 1.1.125

Benchmark performance


Non-gaming benchmark performance of Radeon Pro Vega 48. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.


Pro Vega 48
38.37

  • Passmark

  • GeekBench 5 OpenCL

  • GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Passmark

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 26%


Pro Vega 48
11352

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU’s processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%


Pro Vega 48
51123

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU’s processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%


Pro Vega 48
56184

Game benchmarks


Let’s see how good Radeon Pro Vega 48 is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

Average FPS
Popular games

Relative perfomance


Overall Radeon Pro Vega 48 performance compared to nearest competitors among server video cards.


NVIDIA Quadro M6000
103.49


NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB
102.71


NVIDIA Quadro P4000
100.63


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
100


NVIDIA Tesla T4
94.53


AMD Radeon Pro SSG
92.47


NVIDIA Tesla M40
87.52

NVIDIA equivalent


The nearest Radeon Pro Vega 48’s NVIDIA equivalent is Quadro P4000, which is faster by 1% and higher by 2 positions in our rating.


Quadro
P4000


Compare


Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon Pro Vega 48:


NVIDIA Quadro M6000
103. 49


NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB
102.71


NVIDIA Quadro P4000
100.63


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
100


NVIDIA Tesla T4
94.53


NVIDIA Tesla M40
87.52


NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q
86.29

Similar GPUs

Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.


Radeon Pro
5700


Compare


Tesla
T4


Compare


Radeon Pro
SSG


Compare


Radeon Pro
Vega 64


Compare


Radeon Pro
5700 XT


Compare


Quadro P5200
Max-Q


Compare

Recommended processors

These processors are most commonly used with Radeon Pro Vega 48 according to our statistics.


Core i9
9900K

16.4%


Ryzen 5
3500U

14.8%


Ryzen 3
3200G

9.8%


Ryzen 3
2200G

8.2%


Core i3
9100F

3.3%


Ryzen 5
3600

3.3%


Ryzen 5
3550H

3.3%


Core i5
9600K

3. 3%


Ryzen 3
PRO 2200G

3.3%


Athlon Silver
3050U

3.3%

User rating


Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.

Questions and comments


Here you can ask a question about Radeon Pro Vega 48, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Radeon Pro 580x vs Vega 48 [Detailed Comparison]










You must have heard or have used the Radeon Pro 580x or the Vega 48 version, most popular among gamers. Here is an honest comparison between the two versions.

Table of Contents

Introduction

Apple products are known for style. Their superior quality, aesthetic and ergonometric design, and ever smooth performance all speak of luxury at its finest. However, that’s only the tip of the iceberg.

IOS is the prime factor that makes apple a top choice for video editors and filmmakers.

So if you are considering buying an iMac, you may be thinking, which GPU to buy?

Key Specifications

The choice between the Radeon pro 580x and Vega 48 has sparked a great debate across the globe. Let’s have a look at the key specs of each:

Radeon Pro 580x

  • 5700 million transistors
  • Efficient clock speeds 1257 MHz – 1340 MHz
  • The thermal design point (TDP) is 185 watts only
  • 1 HD media interface and three display ports
  • Memory generation is GDDR5

Radeon Pro Vega 48

  • Transistors 12500 million
  • Core clock speed 1200 MHz
  • Boost clock 1300 MHz
  • Enriched textures: 249. 6
  • TDP 12500 million watts
  • Memory generation is HBM2

Radeon Pro Vega 48 and Radeon 580x: A Comparison

  1. AMD Radeon Pro 580x is older than the vega 48. (2017 vs. 2019)
  2. The Radeon Pro 580x comes with 8GB of GDDR5 memory vs. 8GB HMB2.
  3. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 gives about 50% higher performance than the Radeon 580x 2017. It even scores 30-40% more than the 580x 2019 iMac.
  4. Based on the performance on Passmark benchmark tests, Radeon Pro Vega48 scores better than 580x.
  5. Radeon Pro Vega 48 is 1.5 times faster based on various other game benchmark tests.
  6. Radeon 580x costs $671 compared to Radeon Pro Vega 48, which is $5999.

What Do you Want the 2019 iMAC for?

A better way to decide which GPU to go for is to consider your core usage. See if you need it for primary use, heavy video editing, games, or something else.

Video Editing

The Radeon Pro Vega 48 offers more value but comes with a heavy price tag. If you are into video editing, content creation, or stream a lot of media, it will undoubtedly give you better performance, i.e., about 30-40% higher than the Radeon Pro 580x.

Gaming

Radeon 580x is quite good. Especially if you are an occasional gamer, you don’t need to go all-in for Radeon Pro Vega 48; that’s too much money for the value.

Game Development

For game developers, the Vega 48 is a win. It would be best if you had good graphic support and high-definition streaming for editing when graphics-intensive games were run on both GPUs, Vega 48 outputs very high-resolution textures.

For instance, GPU intensive games like ‘Aztec Ruins’ were run on both systems. Vega 48 gave a 33% faster performance, i.e., higher frames per second (FPS).

Lightroom Use

For basic applications – most miniature graphic-intensive tools – such as the basic features of photoshop, for instance, you don’t need a highly efficient upgrade.

The AMD Radeon Pro 580x will do just great. Instead of investing in the Vega 48, you can buy an SSD card for your iMac and upgrade the ram for a smooth experience.

Is Radeon Pro 580x Good for Gaming?

Radeon pro 580x will give you the HD streaming and graphics that you need for playing games. Though the Vega 48 gives a better output, it mainly does better for game development not, gaming.

Alternatively

Another option you can explore is getting an upgrade or coupling the standard Radeon Pro 580x with, say, an external GPU box via a thunderbolt port. However, the limitation is that the bandwidth speed is significantly slower than the internal GPUs.

Keep in mind; the installation cost will cross about $500.

Verdict

While AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 gives you more room for game development, the Radeon Pro 580x is a better choice for primary users.

As benchmarks reveal in general usage, either video card will give you similar results. Vega 48 is not worth the price for photoshop, gaming, etc.

One may benefit more if they can add more ram or spend on the i9 processor.

Increasing the RAM and installing an SSD will boost the system’s performance, and you will see your programs will run faster without overloading the graphics card or ram.

For professional film-making, video editing, or developing games, AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 is your best bet. You will enjoy improved textures and graphics and faster performance. All that you need to meet the expectations for advanced gaming or professional editing.






Share Article:



Radeon Pro Vega 48 vs Radeon Pro Vega 64 Graphics cards Comparison

In this comparison between Radeon Pro Vega 48 and Radeon Pro Vega 64 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today’s games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards’ performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don’t overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon Pro Vega 48 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro Vega 64 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Radeon Pro Vega 48

Radeon Pro Vega 64

Main Specs

  Radeon Pro Vega 48 Radeon Pro Vega 64
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt
Interface PCIe 3. 0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None None
Memory type HBM2 HBM2
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
 
  • Both video cards are using PCIe 3. 0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
  • Radeon Pro Vega 64 has 8 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro Vega 48.
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • Radeon Pro Vega 48 and Radeon Pro Vega 64 are build with GCN 5.0 architecture.
  • Core clock speed of Radeon Pro Vega 64 is 50 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro Vega 48.
  • Radeon Pro Vega 48 and Radeon Pro Vega 64 are manufactured by 14 nm process technology.
  • Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro Vega 48 and Radeon Pro Vega 64 is 1572 MHz.

Game benchmarks

Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks
high / 1080p 55−60 55−60
ultra / 1080p 35−40 40−45
QHD / 1440p 30−35 30−35
4K / 2160p 18−20 18−20
low / 720p 80−85 85−90
medium / 1080p 65−70 65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 64 in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is 4% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 48.
high / 1080p 85−90 90−95
ultra / 1080p 75−80 80−85
QHD / 1440p 60−65 60−65
4K / 2160p 30−35 30−35
low / 720p 140−150 140−150
medium / 1080p 95−100 100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 64 in Battlefield 5 is 3% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 48.
low / 768p 45−50 45−50
Radeon Pro Vega 48 and Radeon Pro Vega 64 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p 250−260 250−260
medium / 768p 230−240 230−240
QHD / 1440p 150−160 150−160
4K / 2160p 100−110 100−110
high / 768p 220−230 220−230
Radeon Pro Vega 48 and Radeon Pro Vega 64 have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive.
low / 768p 70−75 70−75
medium / 1080p 50−55 50−55
Radeon Pro Vega 48 and Radeon Pro Vega 64 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p 120−130 120−130
medium / 768p 110−120 110−120
ultra / 1080p 110−120 110−120
Radeon Pro Vega 48 and Radeon Pro Vega 64 have the same average FPS in Dota 2.
high / 1080p 70−75 75−80
ultra / 1080p 65−70 70−75
QHD / 1440p 45−50 45−50
4K / 2160p 24−27 24−27
low / 720p 100−110 110−120
medium / 1080p 75−80 75−80
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 64 in Far Cry 5 is 6% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 48.
high / 1080p 100−110 110−120
ultra / 1080p 80−85 85−90
QHD / 1440p 50−55 55−60
4K / 2160p 21−24 21−24
low / 720p 230−240 230−240
medium / 1080p 150−160 160−170
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 64 in Fortnite is 4% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 48.
high / 1080p 95−100 95−100
ultra / 1080p 75−80 75−80
QHD / 1440p 55−60 55−60
4K / 2160p 35−40 40−45
low / 720p 140−150 140−150
medium / 1080p 100−110 100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 64 in Forza Horizon 4 is 1% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 48.
low / 768p 160−170 160−170
medium / 768p 150−160 150−160
high / 1080p 100−110 110−120
ultra / 1080p 55−60 55−60
QHD / 1440p 45−50 50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 64 in Grand Theft Auto V is 2% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 48.
high / 1080p 40−45 45−50
ultra / 1080p 35−40 35−40
QHD / 1440p 27−30 27−30
4K / 2160p 16−18 18−20
low / 720p 100−110 100−110
medium / 1080p 55−60 60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 64 in Metro Exodus is 4% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 48.
low / 768p 120−130 120−130
Radeon Pro Vega 48 and Radeon Pro Vega 64 have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
high / 1080p 90−95 95−100
ultra / 1080p 65−70 65−70
4K / 2160p 18−20 18−20
low / 720p 130−140 130−140
medium / 1080p 100−110 100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 64 in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 48.
high / 1080p 40−45 40−45
ultra / 1080p 27−30 27−30
QHD / 1440p 20−22 21−24
4K / 2160p 12−14 14−16
low / 720p 100−110 100−110
medium / 1080p 60−65 65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 64 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 48.
low / 768p 200−210 210−220
medium / 768p 140−150 140−150
high / 1080p 80−85 85−90
ultra / 1080p 45−50 45−50
4K / 2160p 30−33 30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 64 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 48.
low / 768p 140−150 140−150
ultra / 1080p 70−75 70−75
Radeon Pro Vega 48 and Radeon Pro Vega 64 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.

Full Specs

  Radeon Pro Vega 48 Radeon Pro Vega 64
Architecture GCN 5.0 GCN 5.0
Code name Vega 10 Vega 10
Type Workstation Workstation
Release date 19 March 2019 27 June 2017
Pipelines 3072 4096
Core clock speed 1200 MHz 1250 MHz
Boost Clock 1300 MHz 1350 MHz
Transistor count 12,500 million 12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 14 nm
Texture fill rate 249. 6 345.6
Floating-point performance 11,059 gflops
Length 267 mm
Memory bus width 2048 Bit 2048 Bit
Memory clock speed 1572 MHz 1572 MHz
Memory bandwidth 402.4 GB/s 402.4 GB/s
DirectX 12 (12_1) 12 (12_1)
Shader Model 6.4 6.4
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.0 2.0
Vulkan 1.1.125 1.1.125
 

Similar compares

  • Radeon Pro Vega 48 vs GeForce GTX 1660
  • Radeon Pro Vega 48 vs Quadro P4000
  • Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs GeForce GTX 1660
  • Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs Quadro P4000
  • Radeon Pro Vega 48 vs Apple M1 8 Core GPU
  • Radeon Pro Vega 48 vs GeForce RTX 2060 mobile
  • Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs Apple M1 8 Core GPU
  • Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs GeForce RTX 2060 mobile

Radeon Pro Vega 48 [in 3 benchmarks]

Radeon Pro Vega 48

  • PCIe 3. 0 x16 interface
  • Core frequency 1200 MHz
  • Video memory 8 GB
  • Memory type HBM2
  • Memory frequency 1572 MHz
  • Maximum resolution

Description

AMD launches Radeon Pro Vega 48 19March 2019. This is a GCN 5.0 architecture desktop card based on 14 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at designers. It has 8 GB of HBM2 memory at 1.57 GHz, and coupled with a 2048-bit interface, this creates a bandwidth of 402.4 GB / s.

In terms of compatibility, this is an integrated graphics card.

It provides good performance in tests and games at the level of

38.37%

from the leader, which is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti.


Radeon Pro
Vega 48

or


GeForce RTX
3090 Ti

General information

Information about the type (desktop or laptop) and architecture of Radeon Pro Vega 48, as well as sales start time and cost at that time.

  • 50
  • 100

    • Features

    Radeon Pro Vega 48’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. They indirectly speak of Radeon Pro Vega 48’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

    Number of stream processors 90 ti)
    memory capacity 402.4 GB/s of 14400 (Radeon R7 M260)

    video exit

    21

    Types and number of video connectors present on Radeon Pro Vega 48. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for laptop ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.

    Video connectors

    		OpenCL 2.0
    VULKAN 1. 1.125

    Tests in benchmers 9000.
    These are the results of Radeon Pro Vega 48 rendering performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest video card at the moment.

    Overall benchmark performance

    This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

    Pro Vega 48
    38.37

    • Passmark
    • GeekBench 5 OpenCL
    • GeekBench 5 Vulcan
    Passmark

    This is a very common benchmark included in the Passmark PerformanceTest package. He gives the card a thorough evaluation, running four separate tests for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11, and 12 (the latter being done at 4K resolution whenever possible), and a few more tests using DirectCompute.

    Benchmark coverage: 26%

    Pro Vega 48
    11352

    GeekBench 5 OpenCL

    Geekbench 5 is a widely used benchmark for graphics cards that combines 11 different test scenarios. All of these scenarios are based on the direct use of the processing power of the GPU, without the use of 3D rendering. This option uses the Khronos Group’s OpenCL API.

    Benchmark coverage: 9%

    Pro Vega 48
    51123

    GeekBench 5 Vulkan

    Geekbench 5 is a widely used benchmark for graphics cards that combines 11 different test scenarios. All of these scenarios are based on the direct use of the processing power of the GPU, without the use of 3D rendering. This option uses the Vulkan API from AMD and the Khronos Group.

    Benchmark coverage: 5%

    Pro Vega 48
    56184

    Game tests

    FPS in popular games on Radeon Pro Vega 48, as well as compliance with system requirements. Remember that the official requirements of the developers do not always match the data of real tests.

    Average FPS
    Popular games

    Relative performance

    Radeon Pro Vega 48 overall performance compared to its closest competitor workstation graphics cards.

    NVIDIA Quadro M6000
    103.49

    NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB
    102.71

    NVIDIA Quadro P4000
    100.63

    AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
    100

    NVIDIA Tesla T4
    94.53

    AMD Radeon Pro SSG
    92.47

    NVIDIA Tesla M40
    87.52

    Competitor from NVIDIA

    We believe that the nearest equivalent to Radeon Pro Vega 48 from NVIDIA is Quadro P4000, which is faster by 1% and higher by 2 positions in our rating, on average.


    Quadro
    P4000

    Compare

    Here are some of NVIDIA’s closest competitors to the Radeon Pro Vega 48:

    NVIDIA Quadro M6000
    103. 49

    NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB
    102.71

    NVIDIA Quadro P4000
    100.63

    AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
    100

    NVIDIA Tesla T4
    94.53

    NVIDIA Tesla M40
    87.52

    NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q
    86.29

    Other video cards

    Here we recommend several video cards that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one.


    Radeon Pro
    5700

    Compare


    Tesla
    T4

    Compare


    Radeon Pro
    SSG

    Compare


    Radeon Pro
    Vega 64

    Compare


    Radeon Pro
    5700XT

    Compare


    Quadro P5200
    Max-Q

    Compare

    Recommended Processors

    According to our statistics, these processors are most often used with the Radeon Pro Vega 48.


    Core i9
    9900K

    16.4%


    Ryzen 5
    3500U

    14.8%


    Ryzen 3
    3200G

    9.8%


    Ryzen 3
    2200G

    8.2%


    Core i3
    9100F

    3.3%


    Ryzen 5
    3600

    3.3%


    Ryzen 5
    3550H

    3.3%


    Core i5
    9600K

    3.3%


    Ryzen 3
    PRO 2200G

    3.3%


    Athlon Silver
    3050U

    3. 3%

    User rating

    Here you can see the rating of the video card by users, as well as put your own rating.

    Tips and comments

    Here you can ask a question about Radeon Pro Vega 48, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.

    Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

    performance overview and gaming performance tests

    The Radeon Pro Vega 48 graphics card was released by AMD, release date: 19 March 2019. The graphics card is designed for desktop computers and is based on the Vega 10 PRO architecture, codenamed Greenland.

    Core frequency — 1200 MHz. The core frequency in Boost mode is 1300 MHz. Texturing speed — 249.6 GTexel/s. Number of shader processors — 3072. Technological process — 14 nm. Power consumption (TDP) — 12500 million.

    Memory type: HBM2. The maximum memory size is 8 GB. The memory bus width is 2048 bit. Memory frequency — 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective). The memory bandwidth is 402.4 GB/s.

    Benchmarks

    PassMark
    G3D Mark
    Top 1 GPU
    This GPU
    PassMark
    G2D Mark
    Top 1 GPU
    This GPU
    Geekbench
    OpenCL
    Top 1 GPU
    This GPU
    237214
    CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop
    Face Detection
    Top 1 GPU
    This GPU
    735.800 mPixels/s
    135.416 mPixels/s
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop
    Ocean Surface Simulation
    Top 1 GPU
    This GPU
    7585.258 Frames/s
    1531.134 Frames/s
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop
    T-Rex
    Top 1 GPU
    This GPU
    66. 951 Frames/s
    12.678 Frames/s
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop
    Bitcoin Mining
    Top 1 GPU
    This GPU
    2600.207 mHash/s
    883.876 mHash/s
    GFXBench 4.0
    Car Chase Offscreen
    Top 1 GPU
    This GPU
    34770 Frames
    11925 Frames
    GFXBench 4. 0
    Manhattan
    Top 1 GPU
    This GPU
    27823 Frames
    3947 Frames
    GFXBench 4.0
    T-Rex
    Top 1 GPU
    This GPU
    69225 Frames
    10411 Frames
    GFXBench 4.0
    Car Chase Offscreen
    Top 1 GPU
    This GPU
    34770. 000 Fps
    11925.000 Fps
    GFXBench 4.0
    Manhattan
    Top 1 GPU
    This GPU
    27823.000 Fps
    3947.000 Fps
    GFXBench 4.0
    T-Rex
    Top 1 GPU
    This GPU
    69225.000 Fps
    10411. 000 Fps
    Name Meaning
    PassMark — G3D Mark 11353
    PassMark — G2D Mark 795
    Geekbench — OpenCL 51123
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection 135.416 mPixels/s
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation 1531.134 Frames/s
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex 12.678 Frames/s
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining 883. 876 mHash/s
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen 11925 Frames
    GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan 3947 Frames
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex 10411 Frames
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen 11925.000 Fps
    GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan 3947.000 Fps
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex 10411.000 Fps

    Features

    Architecture Vega 10 PRO
    Codename Greenland
    Generation GCN GCN 5. 0
    Production date March 19, 2019
    Place in the ranking 141
    Type Desktop
    Boost core clock 1300MHz
    Core frequency 1200MHz
    Process 14nm
    Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 499.2GFLOPS
    Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 15.97TFLOPS
    Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 7. 987TFLOPS
    Number of shaders 3072
    Pixel fill rate 83.20 GPixel/s
    Texturing speed 249.6 GTexel/s
    Power consumption (TDP) 12500 million
    Video connectors No outputs
    Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
    DirectX 12.1
    OpenCL 2.0
    OpenGL 4. 6
    Shader Model 6.3
    Vulcan
    High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
    Maximum memory size 8GB
    Memory bandwidth 402.4 GB/s
    Memory bus width 2048 bit
    Memory frequency 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
    Memory type HBM2
    Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
    Video Code Engine (VCE)

    Navigation

    Choose your graphics card

    Compare graphics cards

    Compare AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 with other graphics cards

    AMD
    Radeon Pro Vega 48

    versus

    ATI
    Radeon HD 4850 X2

    AMD
    Radeon Pro Vega 48

    versus

    AMD
    Radeon R7 M380

    AMD
    Radeon Pro Vega 48

    versus

    NVIDIA
    GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)

    AMD
    Radeon Pro Vega 48

    versus

    AMD
    Radeon RX 460 1024SP

    AMD
    Radeon Pro Vega 48

    versus

    NVIDIA
    GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

    AMD
    Radeon Pro Vega 48

    versus

    AMD
    Radeon RX 5600M

    AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 Overview.

    Benchmarks and specs

    The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 graphics card (GPU) is position 69 in our performance ranking. Manufacturer: AMD. AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 runs at a minimum clock speed of 1200 MHz. The graphics chip is equipped with an acceleration system and can operate in turbo mode or when overclocked at a frequency of 1300 MHz. The RAM size is 8 GB GB with a clock speed of 1572 MHz and a bandwidth of 402.4 GB/s.

    The power consumption of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 is , and the process technology is only 14 nm. Below you will find key compatibility, sizing, technology, and gaming performance test results. You can also leave comments if you have any questions.

    Let’s take a closer look at the most important characteristics of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48. To get an idea of ​​which video card is better, we recommend using the comparison service.

    4.4
    From 24
    Hitesti Grade

    Popular video cards

    Most viewed

    AMD Radeon RX Vega 7

    Intel UHD Graphics 630

    Intel UHD Graphics 600

    NVIDIA Quadro T1000

    AMD Radeon RX Vega 10

    NVIDIA GeForce MX330

    Intel HD Graphics 530

    Intel UHD Graphics 620

    Intel HD Graphics 4600

    Intel HD Graphics 520

    Buy here:

    AliExpress

    General information

    The base set of information will help you find out the release date of the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 graphics card and its purpose (laptops or PCs), as well as the price at the time of release and the average current cost. This data also includes the architecture used by the manufacturer and the video processor code name.

    Performance Rating Position: 111
    Architecture: GCN 5.0
    Code name: Vega 10
    Type: Workstation
    Release date: March 19, 2019 (2 years ago)
    Current price: $671
    Value for money: 41.33
    GPU code name: Vega 10
    Market segment: Workstation

    Specifications

    This is important information that determines all the power characteristics of the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 video card. The less technological process of manufacturing a chip, the better (in modern realities). The clock frequency of the core is responsible for its speed (direct correlation), while signal processing is carried out by transistors (the more transistors, the faster the calculations are performed, for example, in cryptocurrency mining).

    Conveyors: 3072
    Core Clock: 1200MHz
    Acceleration: 1300MHz
    Number of transistors: 12,500 million
    Process: 14nm
    Number of texels processed in 1 second: 249.6
    Pipelines / CUDA cores: 3072
    Acceleration speed: 1300MHz
    Number of transistors: 12,500 million

    Dimensions, connectors and compatibility

    There are many form factors of PC cases and laptop sizes today, so it is extremely important to know the length of the video card and its connection types (except for laptop versions). This will help make the upgrade process easier, as Not all cases can accommodate modern video cards.

    Interface: PCIe 3.0 x16
    Additional power: None

    Memory (frequency and overclocking)

    The internal memory is used to store data when performing calculations. Modern games and professional graphics applications place high demands on the amount and speed of memory. The higher this parameter, the more powerful and faster the video card. Memory type, size and bandwidth for AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 + overclocking in turbo mode.

    Memory type: HBM2
    Maximum RAM amount: 8GB
    Memory bus width: 2048 Bit
    Memory frequency: 1572 MHz
    Memory bandwidth: 402. 4 GB/s

    Support for ports and displays

    As a rule, all modern video cards have several types of connections and additional ports, for example HDMI and DVI . Knowing these features is very important to avoid problems when connecting a video card to a monitor or other peripherals.

    Display connections: No outputs

    API support

    All APIs supported by the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 graphics card are listed below. This is a minor factor that does not greatly affect the overall performance.

    DirectX: 12 (12_1)
    OpenGL: 4.6

    Overall gaming performance

    All tests are based on FPS. Let’s take a look at how AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 ranks in the gaming performance test (calculated according to the game developer’s recommendations for system requirements; it may differ from actual situations).

    Select games
    Horizon Zero DawnDeath StrandingF1 2020Gears TacticsDoom EternalHunt ShowdownEscape from TarkovHearthstoneRed Dead Redemption 2Star Wars Jedi Fallen OrderNeed for Speed ​​HeatCall of Duty Modern Warfare 2019GRID 2019Ghost Recon BreakpointFIFA 20Borderlands 3ControlF1 2019League of LegendsTotal War: Three KingdomsRage 2Anno 1800The Division 2Dirt Rally 2.0AnthemMetro ExodusFar Cry New DawnApex LegendsJust Cause 4Darksiders IIIFarming Simulator 19Battlefield VFallout 76Hitman 2Call of Duty Black Ops 4Assassin´s Creed OdysseyForza Horizon 4FIFA 19Shadow of the Tomb RaiderStrange BrigadeF1 2018Monster Hunter WorldThe Crew 2Far Cry 5World of Tanks enCoreX-Plane 11.11Kingdom Come: DeliveranceFinal Fantasy XV BenchmarkFortniteStar Wars Battlefront 2Need for Speed ​​PaybackCall of Duty WWIIAssassin´s Creed OriginsWolfenstein II: The New ColossusDestiny 2ELEXThe Evil Survival 2Middle-earth:8 Shadow of WarFIFA EvolvedF1 2017Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (2017)Team Fortress 2Dirt 4Rocket LeaguePreyMass Effect AndromedaGhost Recon WildlandsFor HonorResident Evil 7Dishonored 2Call of Duty Infinite WarfareTitanfall 2Farming Simulator 17Civilization VIBattlefield 1Mafia 3Deus Ex Mankind Divid edMirror’s Edge CatalystOverwatchDoomAshes of the SingularityHitman 2016The DivisionFar Cry PrimalXCOM 2Rise of the Tomb RaiderRainbow Six SiegeAssassin’s Creed SyndicateStar Wars BattlefrontFallout 4Call of Duty: Black Ops 3Anno 2205World of WarshipsDota 2 RebornThe Witcher 3Dirt RallyGTA VDragon Age: InquisitionFar Cry 4Assassin’s Creed UnityCall of Duty: Advanced WarfareAlien: IsolationMiddle-earth: Shadow of MordorSims 4Wolfenstein: The New OrderThe Elder Scrolls OnlineThiefX-Plane 10. 25Battlefield 4Total War: Rome IICompany of Heroes 2Metro: Last LightBioShock InfiniteStarCraft II: Heart of the SwarmSimCityTomb RaiderCrysis 3Hitman: AbsolutionCall of Duty: Black Ops 2World of Tanks v8Border 2Counter-Strike: GODirt ShowdownDiablo IIIMass Effect 3The Elder Scrolls V: SkyrimBattlefield 3Deus Ex Human RevolutionStarCraft 2Metro 2033Stalker: Call of PripyatGTA IV — Grand Theft AutoLeft 4 DeadTrackmania Nations ForeverCall of Duty 4 — Modern WarfareSupreme Commander — FA BenchCrysi s — GPU BenchmarkWorld in Conflict — BenchmarkHalf Life 2 — Lost Coast BenchmarkWorld of WarcraftDoom 3Quake 3 Arena — TimedemoHalo InfiniteFarming Simulator 22Battlefield 2042Forza Horizon 5Riders RepublicGuardians of the GalaxyBack 4 BloodDeathloopF1 2021Days GoneResident Evil VillageHitman 3Cyberpunk 2077Assassin´s Creed ValhallaDirt 5Watch Dogs LegionMafia Definitive EditionCyberpunk 2077 1.5 GRID LegendsDying Light 2Rainbow Six ExtractionGod of War

    low

    1280×720

    med.

    1920×1080

    high

    1920×1080

    ultra

    1920×1080

    QHD

    2560×1440

    4K

    3840×2160

    Horizon Zero Dawn (2020)

    low

    1280×720

    med.

    1920×1080

    high

    1920×1080

    ultra

    1920×1080

    QHD

    2560×1440

    4K

    3840×2160

    Death Stranding (2020)

    low

    1280×720

    med.

    1920×1080

    high

    1920×1080

    ultra

    1920×1080

    QHD

    2560×1440

    4K

    3840×2160

    F1 2020 (2020)

    low

    1280×720

    med.

    1920×1080

    high

    1920×1080

    ultra

    1920×1080

    QHD

    2560×1440

    4K

    3840×2160

    Gears Tactics (2020)

    low

    1280×720

    med.

    1920×1080

    high

    1920×1080

    ultra

    1920×1080

    QHD

    2560×1440

    4K

    3840×2160

    Doom Eternal (2020)

    low

    1280×720

    med.

    1920×1080

    high

    1920×1080

    ultra

    1920×1080

    QHD

    2560×1440

    4K

    3840×2160

    Description
    5 Stutter — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been studied enough. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to stutter and display low frame rates.
    May Stutter — The performance of this video card with this game has not been studied enough yet. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to stutter and display low frame rates.
    30 Fluent — Based on all known benchmarks with the specified graphic settings, this game is expected to run at 25 fps or more
    40 Fluent — According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphics settings, this game is expected to run at 35fps or more
    60 Fluent — According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphics settings, this game is expected to run at 58 fps or more
    May Run Fluently — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been sufficiently studied. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to show smooth frame rates.
    ? Uncertain — testing this video card in this game showed unexpected results. A slower card could provide higher and more consistent frame rates while running the same reference scene.
    Uncertain — The performance of this video card in this game has not yet been studied enough. It is not possible to reliably interpolate data based on the performance of similar cards in the same category.
    The value in the fields reflects the average frame rate across the entire database. To get individual results, hover over a value.

    AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 in benchmark results

    Benchmarks help you determine performance in standard AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 benchmarks. We’ve compiled a list of the world’s best-known benchmarks so you can get accurate results for each one (see description).