Amd a4 6410: AMD A4-6210 APU vs AMD A8-6410 APU [cpubenchmark.net] by PassMark Software

AMD A4-9125 vs AMD A8-6410

AMD A4-9125 vs AMD A8-6410

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD A4-9125 on one side and the AMD A8-6410 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the notebook sector, It has 2 cores, 2 threads, a maximum frequency of 2,6GHz. The second is used on the notebook segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2,4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specifications:

Processor	AMD A4-9125	AMD A8-6410
Market (main)	Notebook	Notebook
ISA	x86-64 (64 bit)	x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture	Excavator	Puma
Core name	Stoney Ridge	Beema
Family	A4-9000	A8-6000
Part number(s), S-Spec	AM9125AYN23AC	AM6410ITJ44JB
Release date	Q4 2018	Q2 2014
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors	1. 200.000.000	930.000.000
Cores	2	4
Threads	2	4
Base frequency	2,3 GHz	2,0 GHz
Turbo frequency	2,6 GHz	2,4 GHz
Cache memory	1 MB	2 MB
Max memory capacity	12 GB	8 GB
Memory types	DDR4-1866	DDR3L-1866
Max # of memory channels	1	1
Max PCIe lanes	8	8
TDP	15 W	15 W
GPU integrated graphics	AMD Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics (Stoney)	AMD Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics (Beema)
GPU cores	2	8
GPU shading units	128	128
GPU base clock	200 MHz	800 MHz
GPU boost clock	686 MHz	847 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point	167,7 GFLOPS	216,8 GFLOPS
Socket	BGA	BGA769, FT3b
Maximum temperature	90°C	90°C
CPU-Z single thread	142	126
CPU-Z multi thread	265	462
Cinebench R15 single thread	60	49
Cinebench R15 multi-thread	100	164
Cinebench R20 single thread	160	104
Cinebench R20 multi-thread	240	349
PassMark single thread	1. 028	781
PassMark CPU Mark	1.202	1.759
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core	1.560	1.213
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core	2.393	3.136
(Windows) Geekbench 5 single core	308	255
(Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core	518	773
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance	28,83 GFLOPS	22,8 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio	160 pts / W	209 pts / W
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

The processor AMD A8-6410 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of AMD A4-9125 is greater, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The AMD A4-9125 was designed earlier.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

	CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD A8-6410	126 462
AMD A4-9125	142 265

In single core, the difference is 13%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 74%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.

	Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD A8-6410	49 164
AMD A4-9125	60 100

In single core, the difference is 22%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 64%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.

	Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD A8-6410	104 349
AMD A4-9125	160 240

In single core, the difference is 54%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 45%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.

	PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
AMD A8-6410	781 1.759
AMD A4-9125	1.028 1.202

In single core, the difference is 32%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 46%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit
AMD A8-6410	1.213 3.136
AMD A4-9125	1.560 2.393

In single core, the difference is 29%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 31%.

On Linux 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit
AMD A8-6410	1. 019 1.961
AMD A4-9125	1.430 1.513

In single core, the difference is 40%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 30%.

On Android 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit
AMD A8-6410	1.209 3.294
AMD A4-9125	1.973 2.976

In single core, the difference is 63%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 11%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

On Windows:

	Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows
AMD A8-6410	255 773
AMD A4-9125	308 518

In single core, the difference is 21%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 49%.

On Linux:

	Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux
AMD A8-6410	281 787
AMD A4-9125	361 473

In single core, the difference is 28%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 66%.

On Android:

	Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Android
AMD A8-6410	301 884
AMD A4-9125	408 667

In single core, the difference is 36%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 33%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.

Equivalence:

AMD A4-9125 Intel equivalentAMD A8-6410 Intel equivalent

AMD A4-9125 vs AMD A8-6410

Comparative analysis of AMD A4-9125 and AMD A8-6410 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).

AMD A4-9125

Buy on Amazon

AMD A8-6410

Buy on Amazon

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A4-9125

Around 8% higher clock speed: 2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
Around 32% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 1041 vs 787

Maximum frequency	2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
PassMark — Single thread mark	1041 vs 787

Reasons to consider the AMD A8-6410

2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
Around 47% better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 1775 vs 1210

Number of cores	4 vs 2
L2 cache	2 MB vs 1 MB
PassMark — CPU mark	1775 vs 1210

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A4-9125
CPU 2: AMD A8-6410

PassMark — Single thread mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

PassMark — CPU mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

Name	AMD A4-9125	AMD A8-6410
PassMark — Single thread mark	1041	787
PassMark — CPU mark	1210	1775
Geekbench 4 — Single Core		252
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core		749
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)		2.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		98.139
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.1
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)		6.441
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		1.59
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		685
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)		1097
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)		3853
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		685
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)		1097
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)		3853

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD A4-9125	AMD A8-6410
Family	AMD A-Series Processors	AMD A-Series Processors
Launch date	Q2 2018	1 June 2014
OPN Tray	AM9125AYN23AC	AM6410ITJ44JB
OS Support	Windows 10 — 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Linux x86_64
Place in performance rating	1608	1788
Series	AMD A4-Series APU for Laptops	AMD A8-Series APU for Laptops
Vertical segment	Laptop	Laptop
Architecture codename		Beema
Base frequency	2. 3 GHz	2 GHz
Compute Cores	4
L2 cache	1 MB	2 MB
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Maximum core temperature	90°C	90°C
Maximum frequency	2.6 GHz	2.4 GHz
Number of cores	2	4
Number of GPU cores	2
Unlocked
64 bit support
Number of threads		4
Transistor count		930 Million
Max memory channels	1	1
Supported memory frequency	2133 MHz	1866 MHz
Supported memory types		DDR3L
Enduro
Graphics max frequency	686 MHz	847 MHz
iGPU core count	2
Processor graphics	AMD Radeon R3 Graphics	AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Switchable graphics
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Codec Engine (VCE)
DisplayPort
HDMI
DirectX	12	12
Vulkan
Configurable TDP	10-15 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	15 Watt
Sockets supported		FT3b
PCI Express revision	3. 0	2.0
Adaptive Voltage and Frequency Scaling (AVFS)
AMD App Acceleration
AMD HD3D technology
AMD Mantle API
DualGraphics
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4)
Intel® AES New Instructions
AMD Elite Experiences
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP)
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
PowerGating
PowerNow
VirusProtect
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)
IOMMU 2. 0

Navigation

Choose a CPU

Compare processors

Compare AMD A4-9125 with others

AMD
A4-9125

vs

AMD
A8-3550MX

AMD
A4-9125

vs

AMD
A10 Pro-7350B

AMD
A4-9125

vs

AMD
A10-8700P

AMD
A4-9125

vs

Intel
Celeron 4205U

AMD
A4-9125

vs

Intel
Atom x5-E3930

AMD
A4-9125

vs

Intel
Core i7-2610UE

Compare AMD A4-9125 and AMD A8-6410

Comparative analysis of AMD A4-9125 and AMD A8-6410 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphical Interfaces, Graphics API Support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Technologies, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation ( Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames ), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).
nine0003

AMD A4-9125

versus

AMD A8-6410

Advantages

Reasons to select AMD A4-9125

about 8% more clock frequency: 2.6 GHZ VS 2.4 GHZ
Passmark Benchmark-Single Three Mark Single Mark over: 1041 vs 787

max frequency	2. 6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
PassMark — Single thread mark	1041 vs 787

Reasons to choose AMD A8-6410

2 more cores, the ability to run more applications simultaneously: 4 vs 2
L2 cache is 2 times (s) more, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
PassMark — CPU mark about 47% better performance: 1775 vs 1210

Number of cores	4 vs 2
Level 2 cache	2MB vs 1MB
PassMark — CPU mark	1775 vs 1210

Benchmark comparison

CPU 1: AMD A4-9125
CPU 2: AMD A8-6410

nine0027

PassMark — Single thread mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

PassMark — CPU mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

nine0157

Name	AMD A4-9125	AMD A8-6410
PassMark — Single thread mark	1041	787
PassMark — CPU mark	1210	1775
Geekbench 4 — Single Core		252
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core		749
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)		2.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	nine0027 98.139
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.1
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)		6.441
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1.59
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		685
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)		1097
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	3853
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		685
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)		1097
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	3853

Performance comparison

nine0157

nine0027 Laptop

nine0031

nine0027

nine0031

nine0157

nine0027

	AMD A4-9125	AMD A8-6410
Family	AMD A-Series Processors	AMD A-Series Processors
Issue date	Q2 2018	June 1, 2014
OPN Tray	AM9125AYN23AC	AM6410ITJ44JB
OS Support	Windows 10 — 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Linux x86_64
Place in the ranking	1608	1788
Series	AMD A4-Series APU for Laptops	AMD A8-Series APU for Laptops
Applicability	Laptop
Architecture name		Beema
Base frequency	2. 3 GHz	2 GHz
Compute Cores	4	nine0031
Level 2 cache	1MB	2MB
Process	28nm	28nm
Maximum core temperature	90°C	90°C
Maximum frequency	2.6 GHz	2.4 GHz
Number of cores	2	4
Number of GPU cores	2
Unlocked
Support 64 bit
Number of threads		4
Number of transistors		930 Million
Maximum number of memory channels	1	1
Supported memory frequency	2133MHz	1866 MHz
Supported memory types		DDR3L
Enduro
Maximum GPU clock	686MHz	847MHz
Number of iGPU cores	2
Integrated graphics	AMD Radeon R3 Graphics	AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Switchable graphics
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Codec Engine (VCE)
DisplayPort
HDMI
DirectX	12	12
Vulcan
Configurable TDP	10-15 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	15 Watt
Supported sockets		FT3b
Revision PCI Express	3. 0	2.0
Adaptive Voltage and Frequency Scaling (AVFS)
AMD App Acceleration
AMD HD3D technology
AMD Mantle API
DualGraphics
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4)
Intel® AES New Instructions
AMD Elite Experiences
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP)
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
PowerGating
PowerNow
VirusProtect
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)
IOMMU 2. 0

Compare AMD A4-9120e and AMD A8-6410

Comparative analysis of AMD A4-9120e and AMD A8-6410 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Compatibility, Technologies, Virtualization, Graphical Interfaces, Graphics API Support, Peripherals.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation ( Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames ), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).
nine0003

AMD A4-9120e

versus

AMD A8-6410