Amd a4 vs intel i5: AMD A4-5000 APU vs Intel Core i5-5200U

7 декабря, 2022

AMD A4-5000 APU vs Intel Core i5-5200U

  • CPU
  • GPU
  • SSD
  • HDD
  • RAM
  • USB

▲
53944
▼

  

2 Cores, 4 Threads @2.2 GHz, Broadwell.
Release date ≈ Q1 2015.

VS

YouTube*NEW*

About

▲
5078
▼

  

Release date ≤ Q1 2014.

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 129,257 user samples

Benchmark your CPU here

119,093 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 60% Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 31% Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 0.5 GHz (avg)

Poor: 31%

Great: 60%

SPEED RANK: 748th / 1368

Gaming 51%

Yacht

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

10,164 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 33% Base clock 1. 5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 16% Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)

Poor: 16%

Great: 33%

SPEED RANK: 1297th / 1368

Gaming 27%

Raft

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 19%

Surfboard
Effective Speed

Effective CPU Speed 		50.8 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+86% 		27.3 %
Memory

Avg. Memory Latency 		71.7 Pts Much lower memory latency.
+73% 		41. 4 Pts
1-Core

Avg. Single Core Speed 		69.3 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+222% 		21.5 Pts
2-Core

Avg. Dual Core Speed 		118 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+176% 		42.7 Pts
4-Core

Avg. Quad Core Speed 		175 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+126% 		77.4 Pts
8-Core

Avg. Octa Core Speed 		180 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+124% 		80.5 Pts
Memory

OC Memory Latency 		87. 4 Pts Much lower OC memory latency.
+66% 		52.7 Pts
1-Core

OC Single Core Speed 		85.5 Pts Hugely faster OC single-core speed.
+270% 		23.1 Pts
2-Core

OC Dual Core Speed 		148 Pts Hugely faster OC dual-core speed.
+220% 		46.2 Pts
4-Core

OC Quad Core Speed 		210 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+129% 		91.6 Pts
8-Core

OC Octa Core Speed 		210 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+130% 		91.5 Pts

Market Share

Based on 56,439,683 CPUs tested.

See market share leaders
Market Share

Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.24 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞% 		0 %
User Rating

UBM User Rating 		53 % Slightly more popular.
+6% 		50 %
Age

Newest 		93+ Months More recent.
+11% 		104+ Months
64-Core

OC Multi Core Speed 		210 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+130% 		91. 2 Pts
64-Core

Avg. Multi Core Speed 		180 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+122% 		81 Pts

ADVERTISEMENT

its an good cpu if you want to do just browsing but other than tath terrible [Apr ’19 Tinus899]

MORE DETAILS

Systems with these CPUs

Top Builds that include these CPUs

  • Dell Inspiron 5558 (407)
  • Lenovo 80E5 (377)
  • Dell Inspiron 3543 (342)
  • HP Pavilion Notebook (325)
  • Dell Inspiron 3558 (311)
  • Asus X555LJ (294)
  • Asus X555LB (243)
  • HP Pavilion 15 Notebook PC (36)
  • HP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC (32)
  • Acer Aspire E1-522 (24)
  • Lenovo 20240 (18)
  • HP 255 G3 Notebook PC (17)
  • HP 15 Notebook PC (15)
  • Asus X550EA (15)

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance)
November 2022 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB

How it works
  • — Download and run UserBenchmark.
  • — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • — See speed test results from other users.
  • — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

  •   

    Intel Core i5-13600K

  •   

    Intel Core i5-12400F

  •   

    Intel Core i7-12700K

  •   

    Intel Core i5-12600K

  •   

    Intel Core i9-13900K

  •   

    Intel Core i5-12400

  •   

    AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

  •   

    Intel Core i3-12100F

  •   

    AMD Ryzen 5 3600

  •   

    Intel Core i7-11700K

  •   

    Intel Core i5-11400F

  •   

    Intel Core i3-12100

About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube
Feedback

AMD A4-5000 APU vs Intel Core i5-1035G1

  • CPU
  • GPU
  • SSD
  • HDD
  • RAM
  • USB

VS

YouTube*NEW*

About

▲
5078
▼

  

Release date ≤ Q1 2014.

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 63,672 user samples

Benchmark your CPU here

53,508 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 77% Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 38% Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 0.2 GHz (avg)

Poor: 38%

Great: 77%

SPEED RANK: 526th / 1368

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 49%

Yacht

10,164 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 33% Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 16% Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)

Poor: 16%

Great: 33%

SPEED RANK: 1297th / 1368

Gaming 27%

Raft

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 19%

Surfboard
Effective Speed

Effective CPU Speed 		61 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+123% 		27.3 %
Memory

Avg. Memory Latency 		67.2 Pts Much lower memory latency.
+62% 		41.4 Pts
1-Core

Avg. Single Core Speed 		103 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+379% 		21.5 Pts
2-Core

Avg. Dual Core Speed 		190 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+345% 		42.7 Pts
4-Core

Avg. Quad Core Speed 		302 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+290% 		77.4 Pts
8-Core

Avg. Octa Core Speed 		404 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+402% 		80.5 Pts
Memory

OC Memory Latency 		81.1 Pts Much lower OC memory latency.
+54% 		52.7 Pts
1-Core

OC Single Core Speed 		125 Pts Hugely faster OC single-core speed.
+441% 		23.1 Pts
2-Core

OC Dual Core Speed 		244 Pts Hugely faster OC dual-core speed.
+428% 		46.2 Pts
4-Core

OC Quad Core Speed 		418 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+356% 		91.6 Pts
8-Core

OC Octa Core Speed 		568 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+521% 		91.5 Pts

Market Share

Based on 56,439,683 CPUs tested.

See market share leaders
Market Share

Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.38 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞% 		0 %
User Rating

UBM User Rating 		56 % More popular.
+12% 		50 %
Age

Newest 		38+ Months Much more recent.
+63% 		104+ Months
64-Core

OC Multi Core Speed 		571 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+526% 		91.2 Pts
64-Core

Avg. Multi Core Speed 		399 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+393% 		81 Pts

ADVERTISEMENT

Systems with these CPUs

Top Builds that include these CPUs

  • Dell Inspiron 3593 (792)
  • Acer Aspire A315-57G (562)
  • Lenovo 81WE (551)
  • HP Pavilion Laptop 15-cs3xxx (468)
  • Acer Aspire A315-56 (395)
  • Lenovo 82C5 (357)
  • Acer Aspire A515-55 (339)
  • HP Pavilion 15 Notebook PC (36)
  • HP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC (32)
  • Acer Aspire E1-522 (24)
  • Lenovo 20240 (18)
  • HP 255 G3 Notebook PC (17)
  • HP 15 Notebook PC (15)
  • Asus X550EA (15)

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance)
November 2022 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB

How it works
  • — Download and run UserBenchmark.
  • — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • — See speed test results from other users.
  • — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

  •   

    Intel Core i5-13600K

  •   

    Intel Core i5-12400F

  •   

    Intel Core i7-12700K

  •   

    Intel Core i5-12600K

  •   

    Intel Core i9-13900K

  •   

    Intel Core i5-12400

  •   

    AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

  •   

    Intel Core i3-12100F

  •   

    AMD Ryzen 5 3600

  •   

    Intel Core i7-11700K

  •   

    Intel Core i5-11400F

  •   

    Intel Core i3-12100

About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube
Feedback

Compare AMD A4-9120e and Intel Core i5-3230M

Comparative analysis of AMD A4-9120e and Intel Core i5-3230M processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Compatibility, Technologies, Virtualization, Graphical Interfaces, Peripherals, Security and Reliability.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation ( Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames ), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).

AMD A4-9120e

versus

Intel Core i5-3230M

Advantages

Reasons to choose AMD A4-9120e

  • L1 cache is about 25% larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access

    • 9020 9020 ( a) more means more data can be stored in it for quick access

Level 1 cache 160 KB vs 128 KB
Level 2 cache 1MB vs 512KB

Reasons to choose Intel Core i5-3230M

  • 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
  • Approximately 45% more clock speed: 3. 20 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
  • Newer process technology to make the processor more powerful , but with lower power consumption: 22 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2.1 times greater performance in PassMark — Single thread mark benchmark: 1562 vs 751
  • 3x greater performance in PassMark — CPU mark benchmark: 2526 vs 854

Number of threads

4 vs 2
Maximum frequency 3.20 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
Technological process 22 nm vs 28 nm
PassMark — Single thread mark 1562 vs 751
PassMark — CPU mark 2526 vs 854

Benchmark comparison

CPU 1: AMD A4-9120e
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-3230M

PassMark — Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
PassMark — CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
Name AMD A4-9120e Intel Core i5-3230M
PassMark — Single thread mark 751 1562
PassMark — CPU mark 854 2526
Geekbench 4 — Single Core 576
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 1263
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 5.705
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 6.652
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.233
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 1.25
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 2.305
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 2846
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 2846

Performance comparison

AMD A4-9120e Intel Core i5-3230M
Architecture name Stoney Ridge

 Ivy Bridge
Place in the ranking 1988 1808
Processor Number A4-9120e i5-3230M
Applicability Mobile Mobile
Production date January 1, 2013
Price at first issue date $225
Price now $249. 65
Series Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors
Status Launched
Price/performance ratio (0-100) 4.65
Base frequency 1.5 GHz 2.60 GHz
Level 1 cache 160KB 128KB
Level 2 cache 1MB 512KB
Process 28nm 22nm
Maximum frequency 2. 2 GHz 3.20 GHz
Number of cores 2 2
Number of threads 2 4
Support 64 bit
Bus Speed ​​ 5 GT/s DMI
Crystal area 118mm
Level 3 cache 3072KB
Maximum core temperature 105 °C
Maximum number of memory channels 1 2
Maximum memory bandwidth 17. 1 GB/s 25.6 GB/s
Supported memory types DDR4-2133 DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600
Maximum memory size 32GB
Number of shaders 128
Integrated graphics Radeon R3 series Intel® HD Graphics 4000
Device ID 0x166
Graphics base frequency 650MHz
Graphics max dynamic frequency 1. 10 GHz
Maximum GPU clock 1.1 GHz
Intel® Clear Video HD Technology
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI)
Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology
Intel® Quick Sync Video
Supported sockets FT4 FCPGA988
Low Halogen Options Available
Maximum number of processors in configuration 1
Package Size 37. 5mm x 37.5mm (rPGA988B)
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP)
Fused Multiply-Add 3 (FMA3)
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions 2 (AVX2)
Intel® AES New Instructions
4G WiMAX Wireless
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology
Flexible Display interface (FDI)
Idle States
Extended instructions Intel® AVX
Intel 64
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Intel® Fast Memory Access
Intel® Flex Memory Access
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology
Intel® My WiFi Technology
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
Thermal Monitoring
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)
CRT
DisplayPort
eDP
HDMI
Maximum number of monitors supported 3
SDVO
WiDi support
Number of PCI Express lanes 16
PCI Express revision 3. 0
PCIe configurations 1×16, 2×8, 1×8 2×4
Anti-Theft Technology
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Identity Protection Technology
Intel® Secure Key Technology
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT)

Comparison AMD A4-4000 vs Intel Core i5-2300 which is better?

Main / Processor / AMD A4-4000 vs Intel Core i5-2300

AMD A4-4000

2%

DeviceList score

vs

Intel Core i5-2300

6%

DeviceList Score

We compared the specs of AMD A4-4000 and Intel Core i5-2300 and compiled a list of benefits and comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2022.

AMD A4-4000 Advantage

Base frequency

3 GHz

0.2 GHz (7.1%) better than

vs

2.8 GHz

Maximum frequency

3.2 GHz

0.1 GHz (3.2%) better than

vs

3.1 GHz

Value for money

89.4%

45.6% (104.1%) better than

vs

43.8%

Power Demand (TDP)

65 W

-30 W (-31.6%) better than

vs

95 W

Benefits of Intel Core i5-2300

Comparison winner

Core

4

2 (100%) better

vs

2

threads

4

2 (100%) better than

vs

2

64 bit support

vs

Passmark

3439

2286 (198. 3%) better than

vs

1153

General

Type

Desktop Desktop

Architecture code name

Richland Sandy Bridge

Cores

A large number of cores improves performance in multi-threaded applications.
At the moment, increasing the number of processor cores is one of the priorities for increasing performance.

2 4

2 (100%) better than

Threads

More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases).

2 4

2 (100%) better than

Base frequency

3 GHz

At 0. 2 GHz (7.1%) better than

2.8 GHz

Process

32 nm 32 nm

Chip size

246 mm2 216 mm2

Number of transistors

1 million 1 million

Maximum frequency

Faster clocked processors perform more calculations per second and thus provide better performance.

3.2GHz

Better than

at 0.1 GHz (3.2%)

3.1 GHz

Support 64 bit

Max. number of processors per configuration

1 1

Socket

FM2 LGA1155

AMD-V

Release price

n/a 168 $

Value for money

The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues.

89.4%

45.6% (104.1%) better than

43.8%

Maximum core temperature

n/a 73 °C

vPro

TXT

Intel Trusted Execution Technology for hardware-based malware protection. For each protected program, the processor allocates its own isolated section of RAM.

PCI Express revision

no data 2.0

Number of PCI-Express lanes

n/a 16

Identity Protection

n/a +

Flex Memory Access

n/a +

Quick Sync

n/a +

FDI

n/a +

Fast Memory Access

n/a +

Level 1 Cache

The fastest level of cache that works directly with the core. The larger the cache, the better the performance.

128 KB (per core) 64 KB (per core)

Level 2 cache

1 MB (per core) 256 KB (per core)

Level 3 Cache

n/a 6144 Kb (total)

Maximum case temperature (TCase)

70 °C no data

Power Demand (TDP)

The calculated heat output shows the average heat dissipation in load operation,
the larger the value, the more the requirements for cooling and power consumption increase.

65W

-30 W (-31.6%) better than

95 W

EDB

n/a +

InTru 3D

n/a +
Benchmarks

Passmark

1153 3439

2286 (198. 3%) better than

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

n/a 4680
Technologies and additional instructions

Extended instructions0028

 Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX

Turbo Boost

n/a 2.0

Idle States

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)

Technology from Intel that allows the processor to slow down to a minimum frequency to save power when the processor is idle.

Thermal Monitoring

Hyper-Threading

Intel hardware technology that allows multiple threads to be processed on each processor core. For server applications, the performance improvement is up to 30%.

AES-NI

Technology from Intel that speeds up the AES encryption process.

n/a +

AVX

The presence of AVX instructions improves performance in floating point and processor-intensive operations
applications.

RAM parameters

RAM types
Dual channel

DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333

Allowable memory

The maximum amount of RAM that can be used with this processor.

n/a 32 GB

Number of memory channels

n/a 2
Virtualization technologies

EPT

VT-d

Intel virtualization technology allows you to forward devices on the PCI bus to the guest operating system so that it can work with them using its standard tools.

2024 © All rights reserved