Amd a8 quad core vs intel i5 3rd generation: AMD A8-7600 vs Intel Core i5-3470: What is the difference?

AMD A8-7600 vs Intel Core i5-3470: What is the difference?

45points

AMD A8-7600

37points

Intel Core i5-3470

Comparison winner

vs

64 facts in comparison

AMD A8-7600

Intel Core i5-3470

Why is AMD A8-7600 better than Intel Core i5-3470?

• 533MHz higher ram speed?
  2133MHzvs1600MHz
• 70MHz faster GPU clock speed?
  720MHzvs650MHz
• 3.9°C higher maximum operating temperature?
  71.3°Cvs67.4°C
• 3MB bigger L2 cache?
  4MBvs1MB
• 0.2GHz higher turbo clock speed?
  3.8GHzvs3.6GHz
• 12W lower TDP?
  65Wvs77W
• 0.75MB/core more L2 cache per core?
  1MB/corevs0.25MB/core
• 8.5GB/s more memory bandwidth?
  34.1GB/svs25.6GB/s

Why is Intel Core i5-3470 better than AMD A8-7600?

• 6nm smaller semiconductor size?
  22nmvs28nm
• 30. 4% higher PassMark result?
  6606vs5066
• 23.66% higher PassMark result (single)?
  1908vs1543

Which are the most popular comparisons?

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

vs

Intel Core i5-1135G7

AMD Ryzen 3 3250U

vs

Intel Core i3-1115G4

AMD Ryzen 3 5300U

vs

Intel Core i3-1115G4

AMD Ryzen 7 5700U

vs

Intel Core i7-1165G7

AMD Ryzen 7 3700U

vs

Intel Core i5-10210U

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

vs

Intel Core i3-1115G4

AMD Ryzen 5 3500U

vs

Intel Core i5-10210U

Intel Core i3-1115G4

vs

Intel Core i5-1135G7

AMD Ryzen 7 5800H

vs

Intel Core i7-11800H

Intel Celeron N4020

vs

Intel Core i3-1005G1

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

AMD A8-7600

1 User reviews

AMD A8-7600

10.0/10

1 User reviews

Intel Core i5-3470

3 User reviews

Intel Core i5-3470

8. 3/10

3 User reviews

Features

Value for money

10.0/10

1 votes

9.0/10

3 votes

Gaming

10.0/10

1 votes

8.0/10

3 votes

Performance

8.0/10

1 votes

8.3/10

3 votes

Reliability

10.0/10

1 votes

9.3/10

3 votes

Energy efficiency

8.0/10

1 votes

9.3/10

3 votes

Performance

1.CPU speed

4 x 3.1GHz

4 x 3.2GHz

The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.

2.CPU threads

More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.

3.turbo clock speed

3.8GHz

3.6GHz

When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

4.Has an unlocked multiplier

✖AMD A8-7600

✖Intel Core i5-3470

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.

5.L2 cache

A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

6.L3 cache

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-7600)

A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

7.L1 cache

A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

8.L2 core

1MB/core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

9.L3 core

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-7600)

1.5MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

Memory

1.RAM speed

2133MHz

1600MHz

It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

34.1GB/s

25.6GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.DDR memory version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-7600)

DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.

4.memory channels

More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.

5. maximum memory amount

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-7600)

The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.

6.bus transfer rate

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-7600)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7.Supports ECC memory

✖AMD A8-7600

✖Intel Core i5-3470

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-7600)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-3470)

A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.

9.bus speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-7600)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-3470)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

Benchmarks

1.PassMark result

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.

2.PassMark result (single)

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-7600)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-7600)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 (single) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-7600)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-3470)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-7600)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7.Blender (bmw27) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-7600)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-3470)

The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

8.Blender (classroom) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-7600)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-3470)

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

9.performance per watt

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-7600)

This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.

Features

1.uses multithreading

✖AMD A8-7600

✖Intel Core i5-3470

Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.

2.Has AES

✔AMD A8-7600

✔Intel Core i5-3470

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3.Has AVX

✔AMD A8-7600

✔Intel Core i5-3470

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.

4.SSE version

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5.Has F16C

✔AMD A8-7600

✔Intel Core i5-3470

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

6.bits executed at a time

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-7600)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-3470)

NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.

7.Has MMX

✔AMD A8-7600

✔Intel Core i5-3470

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

8.Has TrustZone

✖AMD A8-7600

✖Intel Core i5-3470

A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).

9.front-end width

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-7600)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-3470)

The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best CPUs?

AMD A8-7600 vs Intel Core i5-3470

Comparative analysis of AMD A8-7600 and Intel Core i5-3470 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Peripherals, Security & Reliability.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score.

AMD A8-7600

Buy on Amazon

vs

Intel Core i5-3470

Buy on Amazon

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A8-7600

• Around 6% higher clock speed: 3.8 GHz vs 3.60 GHz
• Around 6% higher maximum core temperature: 71.30°C vs 67.4°C
• 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 77 Watt
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.318 vs 3.217
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 10.348 vs 9.637
• 13.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.707 vs 1.821
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames): 3961 vs 1515
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps): 3961 vs 1515

Maximum frequency	3.8 GHz vs 3.60 GHz
Maximum core temperature	71.30°C vs 67.4°C
L2 cache	4 MB vs 1024 KB
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt vs 77 Watt
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	4. 318 vs 3.217
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	10.348 vs 9.637
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	24.707 vs 1.821
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	3961 vs 1515
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	3961 vs 1515

Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-3470

• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 34% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 1942 vs 1454
• Around 45% better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 4666 vs 3217
• Around 51% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 734 vs 486
• Around 69% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 2396 vs 1415
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.393 vs 0.193
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 5.424 vs 4.274

Manufacturing process technology	22 nm vs 28 nm
PassMark — Single thread mark	1942 vs 1454
PassMark — CPU mark	4666 vs 3217
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	734 vs 486
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	2396 vs 1415
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.393 vs 0.193
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	5. 424 vs 4.274

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A8-7600
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-3470

PassMark — Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2
PassMark — CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	10.348
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	24.707
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	CPU 1 CPU 2
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps)	CPU 1 CPU 2

Name	AMD A8-7600	Intel Core i5-3470
PassMark — Single thread mark	1454	1942
PassMark — CPU mark	3217	4666
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	486	734
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	1415	2396
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	4.318	3.217
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	10.348	9.637
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.193	0.393
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	24.707	1.821
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	4.274	5.424
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1343
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)	1585
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	3961	1515
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1343
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)	1585
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	3961	1515
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score		2692

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD A8-7600	Intel Core i5-3470
Family	AMD A-Series Processors
OPN PIB	AD7600YBJABOX
OPN Tray	AD7600YBI44JA
Place in performance rating	1267	1779
Series	AMD A8-Series APU for Desktops	Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors
Vertical segment	Desktop	Desktop
Architecture codename		Ivy Bridge
Launch date		8 April 2012
Launch price (MSRP)		$184
Price now		$112. 06
Processor Number		i5-3470
Status		Discontinued
Value for money (0-100)		17.60
Base frequency	3.1 GHz	3.20 GHz
Compute Cores	10
L1 cache	256 KB	64 KB (per core)
L2 cache	4 MB	1024 KB
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	22 nm
Maximum core temperature	71. 30°C	67.4°C
Maximum frequency	3.8 GHz	3.60 GHz
Number of cores	4	4
Number of GPU cores	6
Number of threads	4	4
Unlocked
64 bit support
Bus Speed		5 GT/s DMI
Die size		132. 8 mm
L3 cache		6144 KB
Maximum case temperature (TCase)		67 °C
Max memory channels	2	2
Supported memory frequency	2133 MHz
Maximum memory bandwidth		25.6 GB/s
Maximum memory size		32 GB
Supported memory types		DDR3 1333/1600
Enduro
Graphics max frequency	720 MHz	1. 1 GHz
iGPU core count	384
Processor graphics	AMD Radeon R7 Graphics	Intel® HD Graphics 2500
Switchable graphics
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Codec Engine (VCE)
Device ID		0x152
Graphics base frequency		650 MHz
Graphics max dynamic frequency		1. 10 GHz
Intel® Clear Video HD technology
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI)
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology
Intel® Quick Sync Video
DisplayPort
HDMI
Number of displays supported		3
Wireless Display (WiDi) support
DirectX	12
Vulkan
Configurable TDP	45 Watt/65 Watt
Sockets supported	FM2+	FCLGA1155
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt	77 Watt
Low Halogen Options Available
Max number of CPUs in a configuration		1
Package Size		37. 5mm x 37.5mm
Thermal Solution		2011D
AMD App Acceleration
AMD Elite Experiences
AMD HD3D technology
AMD Mantle API
DualGraphics
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP)
FreeSync
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4)
Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions
Out-of-band client management
PowerGating
PowerNow
System Image Stability
TrueAudio
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
Flexible Display interface (FDI)
Idle States
Instruction set extensions		Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX
Intel 64
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® TSX-NI
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
Thermal Monitoring
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)
IOMMU 2. 0
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)
PCI Express revision		3.0
PCIe configurations		up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8 & 2×4
Anti-Theft technology
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Identity Protection technology
Intel® Secure Key technology
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)

A8-7680 vs Core i5-3470 Review

Add One More CPU To this Comparison
Select a CPU. .AMD A10 Micro-6700TAMD A10 Pro-7350BAMD A10-4600MAMD A10-4655MAMD A10-4657MAMD A10-5700AMD A10-5745MAMD A10-5750MAMD A10-5757MAMD A10-5800KAMD A10-6700AMD A10-6700TAMD A10-6790BAMD A10-6790KAMD A10-6800BAMD A10-6800KAMD A10-7300AMD A10-7350BAMD A10-7400PAMD A10-7700KAMD A10-7800AMD A10-7850KAMD A10-7860kAMD A10-7870KAMD A10-7890KAMD A10-8700PAMD A10-9600PAMD A10-9620PAMD A10-9700AMD A10-9700EAMD A12-9700PAMD A12-9720PAMD A12-9800AMD A12-9800EAMD A4 Micro-6400TAMD A4-1200AMD A4-1250AMD A4-1350AMD A4-3300AMD A4-3300MAMD A4-3305MAMD A4-3310MXAMD A4-3320MAMD A4-3330MXAMD A4-3400AMD A4-3420AMD A4-3450AMD A4-4000AMD A4-4020AMD A4-4300MAMD A4-4355MAMD A4-5000AMD A4-5050AMD A4-5100AMD A4-5145MAMD A4-5150MAMD A4-5300AMD A4-5300BAMD A4-6210AMD A4-6300AMD A4-6300BAMD A4-6320AMD A4-7210AMD A4-7300AMD A4-9120AMD A4-9120CAMD A6 Pro-7050BAMD A6-1450AMD A6-3400MAMD A6-3410MXAMD A6-3420MAMD A6-3430MXAMD A6-3500AMD A6-3600AMD A6-3620AMD A6-3650AMD A6-3670KAMD A6-4400MAMD A6-4455MAMD A6-5200AMD A6-5350MAMD A6-5357MAMD A6-5400BAMD A6-5400KAMD A6-6310AMD A6-6400KAMD A6-6420KAMD A6-7000AMD A6-7050BAMD A6-7310AMD A6-7400KAMD A6-7470KAMD A6-7480AMD A6-8500PAMD A6-9120AMD A6-9120CAMD A6-9210AMD A6-9220AMD A6-9220CAMD A6-9225AMD A6-9500AMD A6-9500EAMD A6-9550AMD A8-3500MAMD A8-3510MXAMD A8-3520MAMD A8-3530MXAMD A8-3550MXAMD A8-3800AMD A8-3820AMD A8-3850AMD A8-3870KAMD A8-4500MAMD A8-4555MAMD A8-5500AMD A8-5500BAMD A8-5545MAMD A8-5550MAMD A8-5557MAMD A8-5600KAMD A8-6410AMD A8-6500AMD A8-6500TAMD A8-6600KAMD A8-7100AMD A8-7150BAMD A8-7200PAMD A8-7410AMD A8-7600AMD A8-7650KAMD A8-7670KAMD A8-8600PAMD A8-9600AMD A9-9410AMD A9-9420AMD A9-9420eAMD A9-9425AMD Athlon 200GEAMD Athlon 220GEAMD Athlon 240GEAMD Athlon 3000GAMD Athlon 300UAMD Athlon 5150AMD Athlon 5350AMD Athlon 5370AMD Athlon 64 2000+AMD Athlon 64 2600+AMD Athlon 64 2800+AMD Athlon 64 3000+AMD Athlon 64 3200+AMD Athlon 64 3300+AMD Athlon 64 3400+AMD Athlon 64 3500+AMD Athlon 64 3600+AMD Athlon 64 3700+AMD Athlon 64 3800+AMD Athlon 64 4000+AMD Athlon 64 FX-51AMD Athlon 64 FX-53AMD Athlon 64 FX-55AMD Athlon 64 FX-57AMD Athlon 64 FX-60AMD Athlon 64 FX-62AMD Athlon 64 FX-72AMD Athlon 64 FX-74AMD Athlon 64 TF-20AMD Athlon 64 X2 3600+AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+AMD Athlon 64 X2 5400+AMD Athlon 64 X2 5600+AMD Athlon 64 X2 5800+AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+AMD Athlon 64 X2 FX-60AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-42AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-53AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-55AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-57AMD Athlon Gold 3150UAMD Athlon II 160uAMD Athlon II M300AMD Athlon II M320AMD Athlon II M340AMD Athlon II N330AMD Athlon II N350AMD Athlon II N370AMD Athlon II Neo K125AMD Athlon II Neo K145AMD Athlon II Neo K325AMD Athlon II Neo K345AMD Athlon II P320AMD Athlon II P340AMD Athlon II P360AMD Athlon II X2 210eAMD Athlon II X2 215AMD Athlon II X2 220AMD Athlon II X2 221AMD Athlon II X2 235eAMD Athlon II X2 240AMD Athlon II X2 240eAMD Athlon II X2 245AMD Athlon II X2 245eAMD Athlon II X2 250AMD Athlon II X2 250eAMD Athlon II X2 250uAMD Athlon II X2 255AMD Athlon II X2 260AMD Athlon II X2 260uAMD Athlon II X2 265AMD Athlon II X2 270AMD Athlon II X2 270uAMD Athlon II X2 280AMD Athlon II X2 340AMD Athlon II X2 370KAMD Athlon II X3 400eAMD Athlon II X3 405eAMD Athlon II X3 415eAMD Athlon II X3 420eAMD Athlon II X3 425AMD Athlon II X3 425eAMD Athlon II X3 435AMD Athlon II X3 440AMD Athlon II X3 445AMD Athlon II X3 450AMD Athlon II X3 455AMD Athlon II X3 460AMD Athlon II X4 600eAMD Athlon II X4 605eAMD Athlon II X4 610eAMD Athlon II X4 615eAMD Athlon II X4 620AMD Athlon II X4 620eAMD Athlon II X4 630AMD Athlon II X4 631AMD Athlon II X4 635AMD Athlon II X4 638AMD Athlon II X4 640AMD Athlon II X4 641AMD Athlon II X4 645AMD Athlon II X4 651AMD Athlon II X4 651KAMD Athlon II X4 740AMD Athlon II X4 750KAMD Athlon II X4 760KAMD Athlon II X4 860KAMD Athlon MP 2400+AMD Athlon MP 2800+AMD Athlon Neo MV-40AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325AMD Athlon Neo X2 L335AMD Athlon PRO 200GEAMD Athlon PRO 300GEAMD Athlon PRO 300UAMD Athlon Silver 3050UAMD Athlon X2 340AMD Athlon X2 350AMD Athlon X2 370KAMD Athlon X2 450AMD Athlon X2 BE-2300AMD Athlon X2 BE-2350AMD Athlon X2 BE-2400AMD Athlon X2 L310AMD Athlon X2 QL-60AMD Athlon X2 QL-64AMD Athlon X2 QL-65AMD Athlon X2 QL-66AMD Athlon X4 530AMD Athlon X4 550AMD Athlon X4 740AMD Athlon X4 750KAMD Athlon X4 760KAMD Athlon X4 835AMD Athlon X4 840AMD Athlon X4 845AMD Athlon X4 860KAMD Athlon X4 870KAMD Athlon X4 880KAMD Athlon X4 940AMD Athlon X4 950AMD Athlon X4 970AMD Athlon XP 1500+AMD Athlon XP 1600+AMD Athlon XP 1700+AMD Athlon XP 1800+AMD Athlon XP 1900+AMD Athlon XP 2000+AMD Athlon XP 2100+AMD Athlon XP 2200+AMD Athlon XP 2400+AMD Athlon XP 2500+AMD Athlon XP 2600+AMD Athlon XP 2700+AMD Athlon XP 2800+AMD Athlon XP 3000+AMD Athlon XP 3100+AMD Athlon XP 3200+AMD C-30AMD C-50AMD C-60AMD C-70AMD E-240AMD E-300AMD E-350AMD E-350DAMD E-450AMD E-Series E-450AMD E1-1200AMD E1-1500AMD E1-2100AMD E1-2200AMD E1-2500AMD E1-6010AMD E2-1800AMD E2-2000AMD E2-3000AMD E2-3000MAMD E2-3200AMD E2-3300MAMD E2-3800AMD E2-6110AMD E2-7110AMD E2-9000AMD E2-9010AMD EPYC 7371AMD Epyc 7232PAMD Epyc 7251AMD Epyc 7252AMD Epyc 7262AMD Epyc 7272AMD Epyc 7281AMD Epyc 7282AMD Epyc 7301AMD Epyc 7302AMD Epyc 7302PAMD Epyc 7351AMD Epyc 7351PAMD Epyc 7352AMD Epyc 7401AMD Epyc 7401PAMD Epyc 7402AMD Epyc 7402PAMD Epyc 7451AMD Epyc 7452AMD Epyc 7501AMD Epyc 7502AMD Epyc 7502PAMD Epyc 7532AMD Epyc 7542AMD Epyc 7551AMD Epyc 7551PAMD Epyc 7552AMD Epyc 7601AMD Epyc 7642AMD Epyc 7662AMD Epyc 7702AMD Epyc 7702PAMD Epyc 7742AMD FX-4100AMD FX-4130AMD FX-4150AMD FX-4170AMD FX-4200AMD FX-4300AMD FX-4320AMD FX-4350AMD FX-6100AMD FX-6120AMD FX-6130AMD FX-6200AMD FX-6300AMD FX-6330AMD FX-6350AMD FX-7500AMD FX-7600PAMD FX-8100AMD FX-8120AMD FX-8140AMD FX-8150AMD FX-8300AMD FX-8310AMD FX-8320AMD FX-8320EAMD FX-8350AMD FX-8370AMD FX-8370EAMD FX-8800PAMD FX-9370AMD FX-9590AMD FX-9800PAMD FX-9830PAMD G-T16RAMD G-T24LAMD G-T30LAMD G-T40EAMD G-T40NAMD G-T40RAMD G-T44RAMD G-T48EAMD G-T48LAMD G-T48NAMD G-T52RAMD G-T56EAMD G-T56NAMD Mobile Athlon 64 2700+AMD Mobile Athlon 64 2800+AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3000+AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3200+AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3400+AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3700+AMD Mobile Athlon 64 4000+AMD Mobile Sempron 210UAMD Mobile Sempron 2600+AMD Mobile Sempron 2800+AMD Mobile Sempron 3000+AMD Mobile Sempron 3100+AMD Mobile Sempron 3200+AMD Mobile Sempron 3300+AMD Mobile Sempron 3400+AMD Mobile Sempron 3500+AMD Mobile Sempron 3600+AMD Mobile Sempron 3800+AMD Mobile Sempron M100AMD Mobile Sempron SI-40AMD Mobile Sempron SI-42AMD Opteron 140AMD Opteron 142AMD Opteron 144AMD Opteron 146AMD Opteron 148AMD Opteron 150AMD Opteron 152AMD Opteron 154AMD Opteron 246AMD Opteron 248AMD Opteron 250AMD Opteron 252AMD Opteron 254AMD Opteron 3280AMD Opteron 3320 EEAMD Opteron 3350 HEAMD Opteron 3380AMD Opteron 4332 HEAMD Opteron 4334AMD Opteron 4386AMD Opteron 6272AMD Opteron 6274AMD Opteron 6276AMD Opteron 6282 SEAMD Opteron 6320AMD Opteron 6328AMD Opteron 6344AMD Opteron 6366 HEAMD Opteron 6376AMD Opteron 6378AMD Opteron 6380AMD Opteron 6386 SEAMD PRO A12-9800BAMD PRO A8-9600BAMD Phenom II 42 TWKR Black EditionAMD Phenom II X2 511AMD Phenom II X2 521AMD Phenom II X2 545AMD Phenom II X2 550AMD Phenom II X2 550 BlackAMD Phenom II X2 555AMD Phenom II X2 555 BlackAMD Phenom II X2 560AMD Phenom II X2 560 BlackAMD Phenom II X2 565AMD Phenom II X2 565 BlackAMD Phenom II X2 B53AMD Phenom II X2 B55AMD Phenom II X2 B57AMD Phenom II X2 B59AMD Phenom II X2 N620AMD Phenom II X2 N640AMD Phenom II X2 X640 BEAMD Phenom II X3 700eAMD Phenom II X3 705eAMD Phenom II X3 710AMD Phenom II X3 715AMD Phenom II X3 715 BlackAMD Phenom II X3 720AMD Phenom II X3 720 BlackAMD Phenom II X3 740AMD Phenom II X3 740 BlackAMD Phenom II X3 B73AMD Phenom II X3 B75AMD Phenom II X3 B77AMD Phenom II X3 N830AMD Phenom II X3 N850AMD Phenom II X3 N870AMD Phenom II X3 P820AMD Phenom II X3 P840AMD Phenom II X4 805AMD Phenom II X4 810AMD Phenom II X4 820AMD Phenom II X4 830AMD Phenom II X4 840AMD Phenom II X4 840TAMD Phenom II X4 850AMD Phenom II X4 900eAMD Phenom II X4 905eAMD Phenom II X4 910AMD Phenom II X4 910eAMD Phenom II X4 920AMD Phenom II X4 925AMD Phenom II X4 940AMD Phenom II X4 940 BlackAMD Phenom II X4 945AMD Phenom II X4 955AMD Phenom II X4 955 BlackAMD Phenom II X4 960TAMD Phenom II X4 960T BlackAMD Phenom II X4 965AMD Phenom II X4 965 BlackAMD Phenom II X4 965 Black (140W)AMD Phenom II X4 970AMD Phenom II X4 970 BlackAMD Phenom II X4 975AMD Phenom II X4 980AMD Phenom II X4 980 BlackAMD Phenom II X4 B93AMD Phenom II X4 B95AMD Phenom II X4 B97AMD Phenom II X4 B99AMD Phenom II X4 N930AMD Phenom II X4 N950AMD Phenom II X4 N970AMD Phenom II X4 P920AMD Phenom II X4 P960AMD Phenom II X4 X920 BEAMD Phenom II X6 1035TAMD Phenom II X6 1045TAMD Phenom II X6 1055TAMD Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)AMD Phenom II X6 1065TAMD Phenom II X6 1075TAMD Phenom II X6 1090TAMD Phenom II X6 1090T BlackAMD Phenom II X6 1100TAMD Phenom II X6 1100T BEAMD Phenom II X6 1100T BlackAMD Phenom X3 8250eAMD Phenom X3 8400AMD Phenom X3 8450AMD Phenom X3 8450eAMD Phenom X3 8550AMD Phenom X3 8600AMD Phenom X3 8650AMD Phenom X3 8750AMD Phenom X3 8850AMD Phenom X4 9100eAMD Phenom X4 9150eAMD Phenom X4 9350eAMD Phenom X4 9450eAMD Phenom X4 9500AMD Phenom X4 9550AMD Phenom X4 9600AMD Phenom X4 9600BAMD Phenom X4 9650AMD Phenom X4 9750BAMD Phenom X4 9850BAMD Pro A10-7800BAMD Pro A10-7850BAMD Pro A10-8700BAMD Pro A12-8800BAMD Pro A4-7300BAMD Pro A6-7400BAMD Pro A6-8500BAMD Pro A8-7600BAMD Pro A8-8600BAMD Ryzen 3 1200AMD Ryzen 3 1300XAMD Ryzen 3 2200GAMD Ryzen 3 2200GEAMD Ryzen 3 2200UAMD Ryzen 3 2300UAMD Ryzen 3 2300XAMD Ryzen 3 3100AMD Ryzen 3 3200GAMD Ryzen 3 3200UAMD Ryzen 3 3250UAMD Ryzen 3 3300UAMD Ryzen 3 3300XAMD Ryzen 3 4300UAMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GAMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200UAMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300UAMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GAMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300UAMD Ryzen 3 Pro 1200AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 1300AMD Ryzen 5 1400AMD Ryzen 5 1500XAMD Ryzen 5 1600AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AFAMD Ryzen 5 1600XAMD Ryzen 5 2400GAMD Ryzen 5 2400GEAMD Ryzen 5 2500UAMD Ryzen 5 2500XAMD Ryzen 5 2600AMD Ryzen 5 2600HAMD Ryzen 5 2600XAMD Ryzen 5 3400GAMD Ryzen 5 3500AMD Ryzen 5 3500UAMD Ryzen 5 3500XAMD Ryzen 5 3550HAMD Ryzen 5 3580UAMD Ryzen 5 3600AMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XTAMD Ryzen 5 4500UAMD Ryzen 5 4600HAMD Ryzen 5 4600UAMD Ryzen 5 5500AMD Ryzen 5 5600XAMD Ryzen 5 7600XAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500UAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500UAMD Ryzen 5 Pro 1500AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 1600AMD Ryzen 7 1700AMD Ryzen 7 1700XAMD Ryzen 7 1800XAMD Ryzen 7 2700AMD Ryzen 7 2700EAMD Ryzen 7 2700UAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 7 2800HAMD Ryzen 7 3700UAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 7 3750HAMD Ryzen 7 3780UAMD Ryzen 7 3800XAMD Ryzen 7 3800XTAMD Ryzen 7 4700UAMD Ryzen 7 4800HAMD Ryzen 7 4800HSAMD Ryzen 7 4800UAMD Ryzen 7 5700XAMD Ryzen 7 5800XAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3DAMD Ryzen 7 7700XAMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700UAMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700XAMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700UAMD Ryzen 7 Pro 1700AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 1700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900AMD Ryzen 9 3900XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XTAMD Ryzen 9 3950XAMD Ryzen 9 4900HAMD Ryzen 9 4900HSAMD Ryzen 9 4900UAMD Ryzen 9 5900XAMD Ryzen 9 5950XAMD Ryzen 9 7900XAMD Ryzen 9 7950XAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900AMD Ryzen PRO 7 4700UAMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900XAMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920XAMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950XAMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920XAMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950XAMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WXAMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WXAMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960XAMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970XAMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990XAMD Sempron 130AMD Sempron 140AMD Sempron 145AMD Sempron 150AMD Sempron 2200+AMD Sempron 2300+AMD Sempron 2400+AMD Sempron 2500+AMD Sempron 2600+AMD Sempron 2650AMD Sempron 2800+AMD Sempron 3000+AMD Sempron 3100+AMD Sempron 3200+AMD Sempron 3300+AMD Sempron 3400+AMD Sempron 3500+AMD Sempron 3600+AMD Sempron 3800+AMD Sempron 3850AMD Sempron LE-1100AMD Sempron LE-1150AMD Sempron LE-1200AMD Sempron LE-1250AMD Sempron LE-1300AMD Sempron X2 190AMD Sempron X2 198AMD Sempron X2 250AMD Turion 64 MK-36AMD Turion 64 MK-38AMD Turion 64 ML-28AMD Turion 64 ML-30AMD Turion 64 ML-34AMD Turion 64 ML-37AMD Turion 64 ML-40AMD Turion 64 ML-44AMD Turion 64 MT-28AMD Turion 64 MT-30AMD Turion 64 MT-32AMD Turion 64 MT-37AMD Turion 64 MT-40AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-50AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-52AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-56AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-58AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-60AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-62AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-64AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-66AMD Turion II M500AMD Turion II M520AMD Turion II N530AMD Turion II N550AMD Turion II Neo K625AMD Turion II Neo K685AMD Turion II P520AMD Turion II P540AMD Turion II P560AMD Turion II Ultra M600AMD Turion II Ultra M620AMD Turion II Ultra M660AMD Turion Neo X2 L625AMD Turion X2 RM-70AMD Turion X2 RM-72AMD Turion X2 RM-74AMD Turion X2 RM-75AMD Turion X2 RM-76AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86AMD V-Series V105AMD V-Series V120AMD V-Series V140AMD Z-01Intel Atom 230Intel Atom 330Intel Atom C2350Intel Atom C2530Intel Atom C2550Intel Atom C2730Intel Atom C2750Intel Atom C3538Intel Atom C3558Intel Atom C3858Intel Atom C3955Intel Atom C3958Intel Atom D2500Intel Atom D2550Intel Atom D2560Intel Atom D2700Intel Atom D410Intel Atom D425Intel Atom D510Intel Atom D525Intel Atom E3805Intel Atom E3815Intel Atom E3825Intel Atom E3826Intel Atom E3827Intel Atom E3845Intel Atom E660Intel Atom E680Intel Atom N2600Intel Atom N270Intel Atom N280Intel Atom N2800Intel Atom N435Intel Atom N450Intel Atom N455Intel Atom N470Intel Atom N475Intel Atom N550Intel Atom N570Intel Atom S1220Intel Atom S1240Intel Atom S1260Intel Atom Z2760Intel Atom Z3460Intel Atom Z3735DIntel Atom Z3735EIntel Atom Z3735FIntel Atom Z3735GIntel Atom Z3736FIntel Atom Z3736GIntel Atom Z3740Intel Atom Z3740DIntel Atom Z3745Intel Atom Z3745DIntel Atom Z3770Intel Atom Z3770DIntel Atom Z3775Intel Atom Z3775DIntel Atom Z3785Intel Atom Z3795Intel Atom Z510Intel Atom Z515Intel Atom Z520Intel Atom Z530Intel Atom Z540Intel Atom Z550Intel Atom Z670Intel Atom x5-E3930Intel Atom x5-E8000Intel Atom x5-Z8300Intel Atom x5-Z8330Intel Atom x5-Z8350Intel Atom x5-Z8500Intel Atom x5-Z8550Intel Atom x7-E3950Intel Atom x7-Z8700Intel Atom x7-Z8750Intel Celeron 1000MIntel Celeron 1005MIntel Celeron 1007UIntel Celeron 1017UIntel Celeron 1019YIntel Celeron 1020EIntel Celeron 1020MIntel Celeron 1037UIntel Celeron 1047UEIntel Celeron 2. 10Intel Celeron 2.20Intel Celeron 2.30Intel Celeron 2.40Intel Celeron 2.60Intel Celeron 2.70Intel Celeron 2.80Intel Celeron 220Intel Celeron 2950MIntel Celeron 2955UIntel Celeron 2957UIntel Celeron 2961YIntel Celeron 2970MIntel Celeron 2980UIntel Celeron 2981UIntel Celeron 3205UIntel Celeron 3215UIntel Celeron 3755UIntel Celeron 3765UIntel Celeron 3855UIntel Celeron 3865UIntel Celeron 3955UIntel Celeron 3965UIntel Celeron 3965YIntel Celeron 420Intel Celeron 4205UIntel Celeron 430Intel Celeron 440Intel Celeron 450Intel Celeron 5205UIntel Celeron 807Intel Celeron 807UEIntel Celeron 827EIntel Celeron 847Intel Celeron 847EIntel Celeron 857Intel Celeron 867Intel Celeron 877Intel Celeron 887Intel Celeron B710Intel Celeron B720Intel Celeron B800Intel Celeron B810Intel Celeron B815Intel Celeron B820Intel Celeron B830Intel Celeron B840Intel Celeron D 352Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1400Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1600Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3000Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3100Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3300Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500Intel Celeron E1200Intel Celeron E1400Intel Celeron E1500Intel Celeron E1600Intel Celeron E3200Intel Celeron E3300Intel Celeron E3400Intel Celeron E3500Intel Celeron G1101Intel Celeron G1610Intel Celeron G1610TIntel Celeron G1620Intel Celeron G1620TIntel Celeron G1630Intel Celeron G1820Intel Celeron G1820TIntel Celeron G1820TEIntel Celeron G1830Intel Celeron G1840Intel Celeron G1840TIntel Celeron G1850Intel Celeron G3900Intel Celeron G3900EIntel Celeron G3900TIntel Celeron G3900TEIntel Celeron G3920Intel Celeron G3930Intel Celeron G3930TIntel Celeron G3930TEIntel Celeron G3950Intel Celeron G440Intel Celeron G460Intel Celeron G465Intel Celeron G470Intel Celeron G4900Intel Celeron G4900TIntel Celeron G4920Intel Celeron G4930Intel Celeron G530Intel Celeron G530TIntel Celeron G540Intel Celeron G540TIntel Celeron G550Intel Celeron G550TIntel Celeron G555Intel Celeron J1750Intel Celeron J1800Intel Celeron J1850Intel Celeron J1900Intel Celeron J3060Intel Celeron J3160Intel Celeron J3355Intel Celeron J3455Intel Celeron J4005Intel Celeron J4025Intel Celeron J4105Intel Celeron J4125Intel Celeron M 340Intel Celeron M 353Intel Celeron M 360Intel Celeron M 370Intel Celeron M 380Intel Celeron M 390Intel Celeron M 410Intel Celeron M 420Intel Celeron M 430Intel Celeron M 440Intel Celeron M 450Intel Celeron M 520Intel Celeron M 530Intel Celeron M 540Intel Celeron M 550Intel Celeron M 560Intel Celeron M 575Intel Celeron M 585Intel Celeron M 723Intel Celeron M 743Intel Celeron M 900Intel Celeron M P4500Intel Celeron M P4600Intel Celeron M U3400Intel Celeron N2805Intel Celeron N2806Intel Celeron N2807Intel Celeron N2808Intel Celeron N2810Intel Celeron N2815Intel Celeron N2820Intel Celeron N2830Intel Celeron N2840Intel Celeron N2910Intel Celeron N2920Intel Celeron N2930Intel Celeron N2940Intel Celeron N3000Intel Celeron N3010Intel Celeron N3050Intel Celeron N3060Intel Celeron N3150Intel Celeron N3160Intel Celeron N3350Intel Celeron N3450Intel Celeron N4000Intel Celeron N4020Intel Celeron N4100Intel Celeron N4120Intel Celeron P4500Intel Celeron P4505Intel Celeron P4600Intel Celeron U3400Intel Celeron U3405Intel Celeron U3600Intel Core 2 Duo E4300Intel Core 2 Duo E4400Intel Core 2 Duo E4500Intel Core 2 Duo E4600Intel Core 2 Duo E4700Intel Core 2 Duo E6300Intel Core 2 Duo E6320Intel Core 2 Duo E6400Intel Core 2 Duo E6420Intel Core 2 Duo E6540Intel Core 2 Duo E6550Intel Core 2 Duo E6600Intel Core 2 Duo E6700Intel Core 2 Duo E6750Intel Core 2 Duo E6850Intel Core 2 Duo E7200Intel Core 2 Duo E7300Intel Core 2 Duo E7400Intel Core 2 Duo E7500Intel Core 2 Duo E7600Intel Core 2 Duo E8190Intel Core 2 Duo E8200Intel Core 2 Duo E8300Intel Core 2 Duo E8400Intel Core 2 Duo E8500Intel Core 2 Duo E8600Intel Core 2 Duo L7100Intel Core 2 Duo L7300Intel Core 2 Duo L7500Intel Core 2 Duo L7700Intel Core 2 Duo P7350Intel Core 2 Duo P7370Intel Core 2 Duo P7450Intel Core 2 Duo P7550Intel Core 2 Duo P7570Intel Core 2 Duo P8400Intel Core 2 Duo P8600Intel Core 2 Duo P8700Intel Core 2 Duo P8800Intel Core 2 Duo P9500Intel Core 2 Duo P9600Intel Core 2 Duo P9700Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400Intel Core 2 Duo T5200Intel Core 2 Duo T5250Intel Core 2 Duo T5270Intel Core 2 Duo T5300Intel Core 2 Duo T5450Intel Core 2 Duo T5470Intel Core 2 Duo T5500Intel Core 2 Duo T5550Intel Core 2 Duo T5600Intel Core 2 Duo T5670Intel Core 2 Duo T5750Intel Core 2 Duo T5800Intel Core 2 Duo T5850Intel Core 2 Duo T5870Intel Core 2 Duo T5900Intel Core 2 Duo T6400Intel Core 2 Duo T6500Intel Core 2 Duo T6570Intel Core 2 Duo T6600Intel Core 2 Duo T6670Intel Core 2 Duo T7100Intel Core 2 Duo T7200Intel Core 2 Duo T7250Intel Core 2 Duo T7300Intel Core 2 Duo T7400Intel Core 2 Duo T7500Intel Core 2 Duo T7600Intel Core 2 Duo T7700Intel Core 2 Duo T7800Intel Core 2 Duo T8100Intel Core 2 Duo T8300Intel Core 2 Duo T9300Intel Core 2 Duo T9400Intel Core 2 Duo T9500Intel Core 2 Duo T9550Intel Core 2 Duo T9600Intel Core 2 Duo T9800Intel Core 2 Duo T9900Intel Core 2 Duo U7500Intel Core 2 Duo U7600Intel Core 2 Duo U7700Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6800Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6850Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9300Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9775Intel Core 2 Extreme X6800Intel Core 2 Extreme X7800Intel Core 2 Extreme X7900Intel Core 2 Extreme X9000Intel Core 2 Extreme X9100Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W)Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200SIntel Core 2 Quad Q8300Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400SIntel Core 2 Quad Q9000Intel Core 2 Quad Q9100Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400SIntel Core 2 Quad Q9450Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505SIntel Core 2 Quad Q9550Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550SIntel Core 2 Quad Q9650Intel Core 2 Solo SU3300Intel Core 2 Solo SU3500Intel Core 2 Solo U2100Intel Core 2 Solo U2200Intel Core Duo L2300Intel Core Duo L2400Intel Core Duo L2500Intel Core Duo T2050Intel Core Duo T2250Intel Core Duo T2300Intel Core Duo T2350Intel Core Duo T2400Intel Core Duo T2450Intel Core Duo T2500Intel Core Duo T2600Intel Core Duo T2700Intel Core Duo U2400Intel Core Duo U2500Intel Core M-5Y10Intel Core M-5Y10aIntel Core M-5Y10cIntel Core M-5Y31Intel Core M-5Y51Intel Core M-5Y70Intel Core M-5Y71Intel Core Solo T1200Intel Core Solo T1300Intel Core Solo T1350Intel Core Solo T1400Intel Core Solo U1300Intel Core Solo U1400Intel Core Solo U1500Intel Core i3-1000G1Intel Core i3-1000G4Intel Core i3-1005G1Intel Core i3-10100Intel Core i3-10110UIntel Core i3-10110YIntel Core i3-10300Intel Core i3-10320Intel Core i3-11100Intel Core i3-11300Intel Core i3-11320Intel Core i3-12100Intel Core i3-12300Intel Core i3-2100Intel Core i3-2100TIntel Core i3-2102Intel Core i3-2105Intel Core i3-2120Intel Core i3-2120TIntel Core i3-2125Intel Core i3-2130Intel Core i3-2310EIntel Core i3-2310MIntel Core i3-2312MIntel Core i3-2328MIntel Core i3-2330EIntel Core i3-2330MIntel Core i3-2332MIntel Core i3-2340UEIntel Core i3-2348MIntel Core i3-2350MIntel Core i3-2357MIntel Core i3-2365MIntel Core i3-2367MIntel Core i3-2370MIntel Core i3-2375MIntel Core i3-2377MIntel Core i3-3110MIntel Core i3-3120MIntel Core i3-3130MIntel Core i3-3210Intel Core i3-3217UIntel Core i3-3217UEIntel Core i3-3220Intel Core i3-3220TIntel Core i3-3225Intel Core i3-3227UIntel Core i3-3229YIntel Core i3-3240Intel Core i3-3240TIntel Core i3-3245Intel Core i3-3250Intel Core i3-3250TIntel Core i3-330EIntel Core i3-330MIntel Core i3-330UMIntel Core i3-350MIntel Core i3-370MIntel Core i3-380MIntel Core i3-380UMIntel Core i3-390MIntel Core i3-4000MIntel Core i3-4005UIntel Core i3-4010UIntel Core i3-4010YIntel Core i3-4012YIntel Core i3-4020YIntel Core i3-4025UIntel Core i3-4030UIntel Core i3-4030YIntel Core i3-4100MIntel Core i3-4100UIntel Core i3-4110MIntel Core i3-4120UIntel Core i3-4130Intel Core i3-4130TIntel Core i3-4150Intel Core i3-4150TIntel Core i3-4158UIntel Core i3-4160Intel Core i3-4160TIntel Core i3-4170Intel Core i3-4330Intel Core i3-4330TIntel Core i3-4340Intel Core i3-4350Intel Core i3-4350TIntel Core i3-4360Intel Core i3-4360TIntel Core i3-4370Intel Core i3-5005UIntel Core i3-5010UIntel Core i3-5015UIntel Core i3-5020UIntel Core i3-5157UIntel Core i3-530Intel Core i3-540Intel Core i3-550Intel Core i3-560Intel Core i3-6006UIntel Core i3-6098PIntel Core i3-6100Intel Core i3-6100EIntel Core i3-6100HIntel Core i3-6100TIntel Core i3-6100TEIntel Core i3-6100UIntel Core i3-6102EIntel Core i3-6157UIntel Core i3-6167UIntel Core i3-6300Intel Core i3-6300TIntel Core i3-6320Intel Core i3-7020UIntel Core i3-7100Intel Core i3-7100EIntel Core i3-7100HIntel Core i3-7100TIntel Core i3-7100UIntel Core i3-7101EIntel Core i3-7101TEIntel Core i3-7102EIntel Core i3-7130UIntel Core i3-7167UIntel Core i3-7300Intel Core i3-7300TIntel Core i3-7320Intel Core i3-7350KIntel Core i3-8100Intel Core i3-8100BIntel Core i3-8100HIntel Core i3-8100TIntel Core i3-8109UIntel Core i3-8121UIntel Core i3-8130UIntel Core i3-8145UIntel Core i3-8300Intel Core i3-8300TIntel Core i3-8350KIntel Core i3-9100Intel Core i3-9100FIntel Core i3-9100TIntel Core i3-9300Intel Core i3-9300TIntel Core i3-9320Intel Core i3-9350KIntel Core i3-9350KFIntel Core i5-10210UIntel Core i5-10210YIntel Core i5-10300HIntel Core i5-1030G4Intel Core i5-1030G7Intel Core i5-10310YIntel Core i5-1035G1Intel Core i5-1035G4Intel Core i5-1035G7Intel Core i5-10400Intel Core i5-10400FIntel Core i5-10500Intel Core i5-10600Intel Core i5-10600KIntel Core i5-10600KFIntel Core i5-11400Intel Core i5-11500Intel Core i5-11600Intel Core i5-11600KIntel Core i5-12400Intel Core i5-12600KIntel Core i5-2300Intel Core i5-2310Intel Core i5-2320Intel Core i5-2380PIntel Core i5-2390TIntel Core i5-2400Intel Core i5-2400SIntel Core i5-2405SIntel Core i5-2410MIntel Core i5-2415MIntel Core i5-2430MIntel Core i5-2435MIntel Core i5-2450MIntel Core i5-2450PIntel Core i5-2467MIntel Core i5-2500Intel Core i5-2500KIntel Core i5-2500SIntel Core i5-2500TIntel Core i5-2510EIntel Core i5-2515EIntel Core i5-2520MIntel Core i5-2537MIntel Core i5-2540MIntel Core i5-2550KIntel Core i5-2557MIntel Core i5-2560MIntel Core i5-3210MIntel Core i5-3230MIntel Core i5-3317UIntel Core i5-3320MIntel Core i5-3330Intel Core i5-3330SIntel Core i5-3335SIntel Core i5-3337UIntel Core i5-3339YIntel Core i5-3340Intel Core i5-3340MIntel Core i5-3340SIntel Core i5-3350PIntel Core i5-3360MIntel Core i5-3380MIntel Core i5-3427UIntel Core i5-3437UIntel Core i5-3439YIntel Core i5-3450Intel Core i5-3450SIntel Core i5-3470SIntel Core i5-3470TIntel Core i5-3475SIntel Core i5-3550Intel Core i5-3550SIntel Core i5-3570Intel Core i5-3570KIntel Core i5-3570SIntel Core i5-3570TIntel Core i5-3610MEIntel Core i5-4200HIntel Core i5-4200MIntel Core i5-4200UIntel Core i5-4200YIntel Core i5-4202YIntel Core i5-4210HIntel Core i5-4210MIntel Core i5-4210UIntel Core i5-4210YIntel Core i5-4220YIntel Core i5-4250UIntel Core i5-4258UIntel Core i5-4260UIntel Core i5-4278UIntel Core i5-4288UIntel Core i5-4300MIntel Core i5-4300UIntel Core i5-4300YIntel Core i5-4302YIntel Core i5-4308UIntel Core i5-430MIntel Core i5-430UMIntel Core i5-4310MIntel Core i5-4310UIntel Core i5-4330MIntel Core i5-4340MIntel Core i5-4350UIntel Core i5-4360UIntel Core i5-4400EIntel Core i5-4402EIntel Core i5-4430Intel Core i5-4430SIntel Core i5-4440Intel Core i5-4440SIntel Core i5-4460Intel Core i5-4460SIntel Core i5-4460TIntel Core i5-450MIntel Core i5-4570Intel Core i5-4570RIntel Core i5-4570SIntel Core i5-4570TIntel Core i5-4570TEIntel Core i5-4590Intel Core i5-4590SIntel Core i5-4590TIntel Core i5-460MIntel Core i5-4670Intel Core i5-4670KIntel Core i5-4670RIntel Core i5-4670SIntel Core i5-4670TIntel Core i5-4690Intel Core i5-4690KIntel Core i5-4690SIntel Core i5-4690TIntel Core i5-470UMIntel Core i5-480MIntel Core i5-5200UIntel Core i5-520MIntel Core i5-520UMIntel Core i5-5250UIntel Core i5-5257UIntel Core i5-5287UIntel Core i5-5300UIntel Core i5-5350HIntel Core i5-5350UIntel Core i5-540MIntel Core i5-540UMIntel Core i5-5575RIntel Core i5-560MIntel Core i5-560UMIntel Core i5-5675CIntel Core i5-5675RIntel Core i5-580MIntel Core i5-6198DUIntel Core i5-6200UIntel Core i5-6260UIntel Core i5-6267UIntel Core i5-6287UIntel Core i5-6300HQIntel Core i5-6300UIntel Core i5-6350HQIntel Core i5-6360UIntel Core i5-6400Intel Core i5-6400TIntel Core i5-6402PIntel Core i5-6440EQIntel Core i5-6440HQIntel Core i5-6442EQIntel Core i5-650Intel Core i5-6500Intel Core i5-6500TIntel Core i5-6500TEIntel Core i5-655KIntel Core i5-6585RIntel Core i5-660Intel Core i5-6600Intel Core i5-6600KIntel Core i5-6600TIntel Core i5-661Intel Core i5-6685RIntel Core i5-670Intel Core i5-680Intel Core i5-7200UIntel Core i5-7260UIntel Core i5-7267UIntel Core i5-7287UIntel Core i5-7300HQIntel Core i5-7300UIntel Core i5-7360UIntel Core i5-7400Intel Core i5-7400TIntel Core i5-7440HQIntel Core i5-7442EQIntel Core i5-750Intel Core i5-7500Intel Core i5-7500TIntel Core i5-750SIntel Core i5-760Intel Core i5-7600Intel Core i5-7600KIntel Core i5-7600TIntel Core i5-7640XIntel Core i5-7Y54Intel Core i5-7Y57Intel Core i5-8200YIntel Core i5-8210YIntel Core i5-8250UIntel Core i5-8257UIntel Core i5-8259UIntel Core i5-8265UIntel Core i5-8269UIntel Core i5-8279UIntel Core i5-8300HIntel Core i5-8305GIntel Core i5-8310YIntel Core i5-8350UIntel Core i5-8365UIntel Core i5-8365UEIntel Core i5-8400Intel Core i5-8400HIntel Core i5-8400TIntel Core i5-8500Intel Core i5-8500BIntel Core i5-8500TIntel Core i5-8600Intel Core i5-8600KIntel Core i5-8600TIntel Core i5-9300HIntel Core i5-9300HFIntel Core i5-9400Intel Core i5-9400FIntel Core i5-9400HIntel Core i5-9400TIntel Core i5-9500Intel Core i5-9500FIntel Core i5-9500TIntel Core i5-9600Intel Core i5-9600KIntel Core i5-9600KFIntel Core i5-9600TIntel Core i7-10510UIntel Core i7-10510YIntel Core i7-1060G7Intel Core i7-1065G7Intel Core i7-1068G7Intel Core i7-10700Intel Core i7-10700FIntel Core i7-10700KIntel Core i7-10700KFIntel Core i7-10710UIntel Core i7-10750HIntel Core i7-10850HIntel Core i7-11700Intel Core i7-11700KIntel Core i7-12700KIntel Core i7-2600Intel Core i7-2600KIntel Core i7-2600SIntel Core i7-2610UEIntel Core i7-2617MIntel Core i7-2620MIntel Core i7-2630QMIntel Core i7-2635QMIntel Core i7-2637MIntel Core i7-2640MIntel Core i7-2655LEIntel Core i7-2657MIntel Core i7-2670QMIntel Core i7-2675QMIntel Core i7-2677MIntel Core i7-2700KIntel Core i7-2710QEIntel Core i7-2715QEIntel Core i7-2720QMIntel Core i7-2760QMIntel Core i7-2820QMIntel Core i7-2840QMIntel Core i7-2860QMIntel Core i7-2920XMIntel Core i7-2960XMIntel Core i7-3517UIntel Core i7-3517UEIntel Core i7-3520MIntel Core i7-3537UIntel Core i7-3540MIntel Core i7-3555LEIntel Core i7-3610QEIntel Core i7-3610QMIntel Core i7-3612QEIntel Core i7-3612QMIntel Core i7-3615QEIntel Core i7-3615QMIntel Core i7-3630QMIntel Core i7-3632QMIntel Core i7-3635QMIntel Core i7-3667UIntel Core i7-3687UIntel Core i7-3689YIntel Core i7-3720QMIntel Core i7-3740QMIntel Core i7-3770Intel Core i7-3770KIntel Core i7-3770SIntel Core i7-3770TIntel Core i7-3820Intel Core i7-3820QMIntel Core i7-3840QMIntel Core i7-3920XMIntel Core i7-3930KIntel Core i7-3940XMIntel Core i7-3960XIntel Core i7-3960X Extreme EditionIntel Core i7-3970XIntel Core i7-3970X Extreme EditionIntel Core i7-4500UIntel Core i7-4510UIntel Core i7-4550UIntel Core i7-4558UIntel Core i7-4578UIntel Core i7-4600MIntel Core i7-4600UIntel Core i7-4610MIntel Core i7-4610YIntel Core i7-4650UIntel Core i7-4700EQIntel Core i7-4700HQIntel Core i7-4700MQIntel Core i7-4702HQIntel Core i7-4702MQIntel Core i7-4710HQIntel Core i7-4710MQIntel Core i7-4712HQIntel Core i7-4712MQIntel Core i7-4720HQIntel Core i7-4722HQIntel Core i7-4750HQIntel Core i7-4760HQIntel Core i7-4765TIntel Core i7-4770Intel Core i7-4770HQIntel Core i7-4770KIntel Core i7-4770RIntel Core i7-4770SIntel Core i7-4770TIntel Core i7-4770TEIntel Core i7-4771Intel Core i7-4785TIntel Core i7-4790Intel Core i7-4790KIntel Core i7-4790SIntel Core i7-4790TIntel Core i7-4800MQIntel Core i7-4810MQIntel Core i7-4820KIntel Core i7-4850HQIntel Core i7-4860EQIntel Core i7-4860HQIntel Core i7-4870HQIntel Core i7-4900MQIntel Core i7-4910MQIntel Core i7-4930KIntel Core i7-4930MXIntel Core i7-4940MXIntel Core i7-4950HQIntel Core i7-4960HQIntel Core i7-4960XIntel Core i7-4960X Extreme EditionIntel Core i7-4980HQIntel Core i7-5500UIntel Core i7-5550UIntel Core i7-5557UIntel Core i7-5600UIntel Core i7-5650UIntel Core i7-5700HQIntel Core i7-5750HQIntel Core i7-5775CIntel Core i7-5775RIntel Core i7-5820KIntel Core i7-5850EQIntel Core i7-5850HQIntel Core i7-5930KIntel Core i7-5950HQIntel Core i7-5960XIntel Core i7-610EIntel Core i7-620LMIntel Core i7-620MIntel Core i7-620UMIntel Core i7-640LMIntel Core i7-640MIntel Core i7-640UMIntel Core i7-6498DUIntel Core i7-6500UIntel Core i7-6560UIntel Core i7-6567UIntel Core i7-6600UIntel Core i7-660UMIntel Core i7-6650UIntel Core i7-6700Intel Core i7-6700HQIntel Core i7-6700KIntel Core i7-6700TIntel Core i7-6700TEIntel Core i7-6770HQIntel Core i7-6785RIntel Core i7-6800KIntel Core i7-680UMIntel Core i7-6820EQIntel Core i7-6820HKIntel Core i7-6820HQIntel Core i7-6822EQIntel Core i7-6850KIntel Core i7-6870HQIntel Core i7-6900KIntel Core i7-6920HQIntel Core i7-6950XIntel Core i7-6970HQIntel Core i7-720QMIntel Core i7-740QMIntel Core i7-7500UIntel Core i7-7560UIntel Core i7-7567UIntel Core i7-7600UIntel Core i7-7660UIntel Core i7-7700Intel Core i7-7700HQIntel Core i7-7700KIntel Core i7-7700TIntel Core i7-7740XIntel Core i7-7800XIntel Core i7-7820EQIntel Core i7-7820HKIntel Core i7-7820HQIntel Core i7-7820XIntel Core i7-7920HQIntel Core i7-7Y75Intel Core i7-8086KIntel Core i7-820QMIntel Core i7-840QMIntel Core i7-8500YIntel Core i7-8550UIntel Core i7-8557UIntel Core i7-8559UIntel Core i7-8565UIntel Core i7-8569UIntel Core i7-860Intel Core i7-860SIntel Core i7-8650UIntel Core i7-8665UIntel Core i7-870Intel Core i7-8700Intel Core i7-8700BIntel Core i7-8700KIntel Core i7-8700TIntel Core i7-8705GIntel Core i7-8706GIntel Core i7-8709GIntel Core i7-870SIntel Core i7-8750HIntel Core i7-875KIntel Core i7-880Intel Core i7-8809GIntel Core i7-8850HIntel Core i7-920Intel Core i7-920XMIntel Core i7-930Intel Core i7-940Intel Core i7-940XMIntel Core i7-950Intel Core i7-960Intel Core i7-965Intel Core i7-965 Extreme EditionIntel Core i7-970Intel Core i7-9700Intel Core i7-9700FIntel Core i7-9700KIntel Core i7-9700KFIntel Core i7-9700TIntel Core i7-975Intel Core i7-975 Extreme EditionIntel Core i7-9750HIntel Core i7-9750HFIntel Core i7-980Intel Core i7-9800XIntel Core i7-980XIntel Core i7-980X EEIntel Core i7-980X Extreme EditionIntel Core i7-9850HIntel Core i7-990XIntel Core i7-990X EEIntel Core i7-990X Extreme EditionIntel Core i9-10875HIntel Core i9-10900Intel Core i9-10900FIntel Core i9-10900KIntel Core i9-10900KFIntel Core i9-10900XIntel Core i9-10920XIntel Core i9-10940XIntel Core i9-10980HKIntel Core i9-10980XEIntel Core i9-11900Intel Core i9-11900KIntel Core i9-12900KIntel Core i9-7900XIntel Core i9-7920XIntel Core i9-7940XIntel Core i9-7960XIntel Core i9-7980XEIntel Core i9-8950HKIntel Core i9-9800XIntel Core i9-9820XIntel Core i9-9880HIntel Core i9-9900Intel Core i9-9900KIntel Core i9-9900KFIntel Core i9-9900KSIntel Core i9-9900TIntel Core i9-9900XIntel Core i9-9920XIntel Core i9-9940XIntel Core i9-9960XIntel Core i9-9980HKIntel Core i9-9980XEIntel Core m3-6Y30Intel Core m3-7Y30Intel Core m3-7Y32Intel Core m3-8100YIntel Core m5-6Y54Intel Core m5-6Y57Intel Core m7-6Y75Intel Core2 Duo E6700Intel Mobile Pentium 4 2. 40Intel Mobile Pentium 4 2.66Intel Mobile Pentium 4 2.80Intel Mobile Pentium 4 3.06Intel Mobile Pentium 4 520Intel Mobile Pentium 4 532Intel Mobile Pentium 4 552Intel Pentium 2020MIntel Pentium 2030MIntel Pentium 2117UIntel Pentium 2127UIntel Pentium 2129YIntel Pentium 3550MIntel Pentium 3556UIntel Pentium 3558UIntel Pentium 3560MIntel Pentium 3560YIntel Pentium 3805UIntel Pentium 3825UIntel Pentium 4 1.80Intel Pentium 4 2.26Intel Pentium 4 2.4 GHzIntel Pentium 4 2.40Intel Pentium 4 2.53Intel Pentium 4 2.60Intel Pentium 4 2.66Intel Pentium 4 2.80Intel Pentium 4 560Intel Pentium 4 630Intel Pentium 4 660Intel Pentium 4 P4 3.0Intel Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7Intel Pentium 4405UIntel Pentium 4405YIntel Pentium 4415UIntel Pentium 957Intel Pentium 967Intel Pentium 977Intel Pentium 987Intel Pentium 997Intel Pentium B940Intel Pentium B950Intel Pentium B960Intel Pentium B970Intel Pentium B980Intel Pentium D 820Intel Pentium D 830Intel Pentium D 915Intel Pentium D 940Intel Pentium D 950Intel Pentium D 960Intel Pentium Dual Core SU4100Intel Pentium Dual Core T2060Intel Pentium Dual Core T2080Intel Pentium Dual Core T2130Intel Pentium Dual Core T2310Intel Pentium Dual Core T2330Intel Pentium Dual Core T2370Intel Pentium Dual Core T2390Intel Pentium Dual Core T2410Intel Pentium Dual Core T3200Intel Pentium Dual Core T3400Intel Pentium Dual-Core T4200Intel Pentium Dual-Core T4300Intel Pentium Dual-Core T4400Intel Pentium Dual-Core T4500Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2140Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2160Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2180Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2200Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2210Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2220Intel Pentium E2140Intel Pentium E2160Intel Pentium E2180Intel Pentium E2200Intel Pentium E2220Intel Pentium E5200Intel Pentium E5300Intel Pentium E5400Intel Pentium E5500Intel Pentium E5700Intel Pentium E5800Intel Pentium E6300Intel Pentium E6500Intel Pentium E6600Intel Pentium E6700Intel Pentium E6800Intel Pentium G2010Intel Pentium G2020Intel Pentium G2020TIntel Pentium G2030Intel Pentium G2100TIntel Pentium G2120Intel Pentium G2130Intel Pentium G2140Intel Pentium G3220Intel Pentium G3220TIntel Pentium G3240Intel Pentium G3240TIntel Pentium G3250Intel Pentium G3250TIntel Pentium G3258Intel Pentium G3260Intel Pentium G3420Intel Pentium G3420TIntel Pentium G3430Intel Pentium G3440Intel Pentium G3440TIntel Pentium G3450Intel Pentium G3450TIntel Pentium G3460Intel Pentium G3470Intel Pentium G4400Intel Pentium G4400TIntel Pentium G4400TEIntel Pentium G4500Intel Pentium G4500TIntel Pentium G4520Intel Pentium G4560Intel Pentium G4560TIntel Pentium G4600Intel Pentium G4600TIntel Pentium G4620Intel Pentium G550Intel Pentium G620Intel Pentium G620TIntel Pentium G630Intel Pentium G630TIntel Pentium G640Intel Pentium G640TIntel Pentium G645Intel Pentium G645TIntel Pentium G6950Intel Pentium G6951Intel Pentium G6960Intel Pentium G840Intel Pentium G850Intel Pentium G860Intel Pentium G870Intel Pentium Gold 4410YIntel Pentium Gold 4415UIntel Pentium Gold 4415YIntel Pentium Gold 4417UIntel Pentium Gold 4425YIntel Pentium Gold 5405UIntel Pentium Gold 6405UIntel Pentium Gold G5400Intel Pentium Gold G5400TIntel Pentium Gold G5420Intel Pentium Gold G5420TIntel Pentium Gold G5500Intel Pentium Gold G5500TIntel Pentium Gold G5600Intel Pentium Gold G5620Intel Pentium III 1133Intel Pentium III 1200Intel Pentium III 1266SIntel Pentium III 1400Intel Pentium III 1400SIntel Pentium J2850Intel Pentium J2900Intel Pentium J3710Intel Pentium J4205Intel Pentium M 1. 30Intel Pentium M 1.40Intel Pentium M 1.50Intel Pentium M 1.60Intel Pentium M 1.70Intel Pentium M 1300Intel Pentium M 705Intel Pentium M 710Intel Pentium M 715Intel Pentium M 718Intel Pentium M 725Intel Pentium M 730Intel Pentium M 735Intel Pentium M 738Intel Pentium M 740Intel Pentium M 745Intel Pentium M 750Intel Pentium M 753Intel Pentium M 758Intel Pentium M 760Intel Pentium M 765Intel Pentium M 770Intel Pentium M 780Intel Pentium N3510Intel Pentium N3520Intel Pentium N3530Intel Pentium N3540Intel Pentium N3700Intel Pentium N3710Intel Pentium N4200Intel Pentium P6000Intel Pentium P6100Intel Pentium P6200Intel Pentium P6300Intel Pentium SU2700Intel Pentium SU4100Intel Pentium Silver J5005Intel Pentium Silver J5040Intel Pentium Silver N5000Intel Pentium Silver N5030Intel Pentium U5400Intel Pentium U5600Intel Xeon 2.66Intel Xeon 3.06Intel Xeon 3.20Intel Xeon 5110Intel Xeon 5120Intel Xeon 5130Intel Xeon 5140Intel Xeon 5148Intel Xeon 5150Intel Xeon 5160Intel Xeon Bronze 3104Intel Xeon Bronze 3106Intel Xeon D-1518Intel Xeon D-1520Intel Xeon D-1521Intel Xeon D-1528Intel Xeon D-1531Intel Xeon D-1537Intel Xeon D-1539Intel Xeon D-1540Intel Xeon D-1541Intel Xeon D-1548Intel Xeon D-1557Intel Xeon D-1559Intel Xeon D-1567Intel Xeon D-1587Intel Xeon D-2123ITIntel Xeon D-2141IIntel Xeon D-2143ITIntel Xeon D-2146NTIntel Xeon D-2183ITIntel Xeon E-2104GIntel Xeon E-2124Intel Xeon E-2124GIntel Xeon E-2126GIntel Xeon E-2134Intel Xeon E-2136Intel Xeon E-2144GIntel Xeon E-2146GIntel Xeon E-2174GIntel Xeon E-2176GIntel Xeon E-2176MIntel Xeon E-2186GIntel Xeon E-2186MIntel Xeon E-2224Intel Xeon E-2224GIntel Xeon E-2226GIntel Xeon E-2236Intel Xeon E-2244GIntel Xeon E-2246GIntel Xeon E-2274GIntel Xeon E-2276GIntel Xeon E-2276MIntel Xeon E-2276MEIntel Xeon E-2276MLIntel Xeon E-2278GIntel Xeon E-2286GIntel Xeon E-2286MIntel Xeon E-2288GIntel Xeon E3-1220Intel Xeon E3-1220 V2Intel Xeon E3-1220 V3Intel Xeon E3-1220 V5Intel Xeon E3-1220 V6Intel Xeon E3-1220LIntel Xeon E3-1220L v2Intel Xeon E3-1220L v3Intel Xeon E3-1225Intel Xeon E3-1225 V2Intel Xeon E3-1225 V3Intel Xeon E3-1225 V5Intel Xeon E3-1225 V6Intel Xeon E3-1226 V3Intel Xeon E3-1230Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2Intel Xeon E3-1230 V3Intel Xeon E3-1230 V5Intel Xeon E3-1230 V6Intel Xeon E3-1230L v3Intel Xeon E3-1231 V3Intel Xeon E3-1235Intel Xeon E3-1235L V5Intel Xeon E3-1240Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2Intel Xeon E3-1240 V3Intel Xeon E3-1240 V5Intel Xeon E3-1240 V6Intel Xeon E3-1240L V5Intel Xeon E3-1241 V3Intel Xeon E3-1245Intel Xeon E3-1245 V2Intel Xeon E3-1245 V3Intel Xeon E3-1245 V5Intel Xeon E3-1245 V6Intel Xeon E3-1246 V3Intel Xeon E3-1260LIntel Xeon E3-1260L V5Intel Xeon E3-1265L V2Intel Xeon E3-1265L V3Intel Xeon E3-1268L v5Intel Xeon E3-1270Intel Xeon E3-1270 V2Intel Xeon E3-1270 V3Intel Xeon E3-1270 V5Intel Xeon E3-1270 V6Intel Xeon E3-1271 V3Intel Xeon E3-1275Intel Xeon E3-1275 V2Intel Xeon E3-1275 V3Intel Xeon E3-1275 V5Intel Xeon E3-1275 V6Intel Xeon E3-1276 V3Intel Xeon E3-1280Intel Xeon E3-1280 V5Intel Xeon E3-1280 V6Intel Xeon E3-1280 v2Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3Intel Xeon E3-1285 V6Intel Xeon E3-1285 v3Intel Xeon E3-1285 v4Intel Xeon E3-1285L v3Intel Xeon E3-1290Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2Intel Xeon E3-1505L v5Intel Xeon E3-1505L v6Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6Intel Xeon E3-1515M v5Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6Intel Xeon E3-1545M v5Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5Intel Xeon E3-1585 v5Intel Xeon E3-1585L v5Intel Xeon E5-1410Intel Xeon E5-1603 v4Intel Xeon E5-1607 v4Intel Xeon E5-1620Intel Xeon E5-1620 V2Intel Xeon E5-1620 V3Intel Xeon E5-1620 V4Intel Xeon E5-1630 V3Intel Xeon E5-1630 V4Intel Xeon E5-1650Intel Xeon E5-1650 V2Intel Xeon E5-1650 V3Intel Xeon E5-1650 V4Intel Xeon E5-1660Intel Xeon E5-1660 V2Intel Xeon E5-1660 V3Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4Intel Xeon E5-1680 V3Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4Intel Xeon E5-2403Intel Xeon E5-2403 v2Intel Xeon E5-2407Intel Xeon E5-2407 v2Intel Xeon E5-2418LIntel Xeon E5-2420Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2Intel Xeon E5-2420V2Intel Xeon E5-2430Intel Xeon E5-2430 v2Intel Xeon E5-2430LIntel Xeon E5-2430V2Intel Xeon E5-2440Intel Xeon E5-2440 v2Intel Xeon E5-2440V2Intel Xeon E5-2450Intel Xeon E5-2450LIntel Xeon E5-2450V2Intel Xeon E5-2470Intel Xeon E5-2470 v2Intel Xeon E5-2470V2Intel Xeon E5-2603Intel Xeon E5-2603 V2Intel Xeon E5-2603 V3Intel Xeon E5-2603 V4Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3Intel Xeon E5-2609Intel Xeon E5-2609 V2Intel Xeon E5-2609 V3Intel Xeon E5-2609 V4Intel Xeon E5-2618L v3Intel Xeon E5-2618L v4Intel Xeon E5-2620Intel Xeon E5-2620 V2Intel Xeon E5-2620 V3Intel Xeon E5-2620 V4Intel Xeon E5-2622 V3Intel Xeon E5-2623 V3Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4Intel Xeon E5-2628L v3Intel Xeon E5-2628L v4Intel Xeon E5-2630Intel Xeon E5-2630 V2Intel Xeon E5-2630 V3Intel Xeon E5-2630 V4Intel Xeon E5-2630LIntel Xeon E5-2630L V2Intel Xeon E5-2630L V3Intel Xeon E5-2630L v4Intel Xeon E5-2637Intel Xeon E5-2637 V2Intel Xeon E5-2637 V3Intel Xeon E5-2637 v4Intel Xeon E5-2640Intel Xeon E5-2640 V2Intel Xeon E5-2640 V3Intel Xeon E5-2640 V4Intel Xeon E5-2643Intel Xeon E5-2643 V2Intel Xeon E5-2643 V3Intel Xeon E5-2643 V4Intel Xeon E5-2648LIntel Xeon E5-2648L v3Intel Xeon E5-2648L v4Intel Xeon E5-2650Intel Xeon E5-2650 V2Intel Xeon E5-2650 V3Intel Xeon E5-2650 V4Intel Xeon E5-2650LIntel Xeon E5-2650L V2Intel Xeon E5-2650L V3Intel Xeon E5-2650L V4Intel Xeon E5-2658Intel Xeon E5-2658 V3Intel Xeon E5-2658 v4Intel Xeon E5-2660Intel Xeon E5-2660 V2Intel Xeon E5-2660 V3Intel Xeon E5-2660 V4Intel Xeon E5-2665Intel Xeon E5-2667Intel Xeon E5-2667 V2Intel Xeon E5-2667 V3Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4Intel Xeon E5-2670Intel Xeon E5-2670 V2Intel Xeon E5-2670 V3Intel Xeon E5-2673 v4Intel Xeon E5-2679 v4Intel Xeon E5-2680Intel Xeon E5-2680 V2Intel Xeon E5-2680 V3Intel Xeon E5-2680 V4Intel Xeon E5-2682 v4Intel Xeon E5-2683 V3Intel Xeon E5-2683 V4Intel Xeon E5-2685 V3Intel Xeon E5-2686 v4Intel Xeon E5-2687WIntel Xeon E5-2687W V2Intel Xeon E5-2687W V3Intel Xeon E5-2687W V4Intel Xeon E5-2689 v4Intel Xeon E5-2690Intel Xeon E5-2690 V2Intel Xeon E5-2690 V3Intel Xeon E5-2690 V4Intel Xeon E5-2692 v2Intel Xeon E5-2695 V2Intel Xeon E5-2695 V3Intel Xeon E5-2695 V4Intel Xeon E5-2696 v4Intel Xeon E5-2697 V2Intel Xeon E5-2697 V3Intel Xeon E5-2697 V4Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4Intel Xeon E5-2698 V3Intel Xeon E5-2698 V4Intel Xeon E5-2699 V3Intel Xeon E5-2699 V4Intel Xeon E5-4603Intel Xeon E5-4610Intel Xeon E5-4617Intel Xeon E5-4620Intel Xeon E5-4627 v4Intel Xeon E5-4640Intel Xeon E5-4650Intel Xeon E5-4650LIntel Xeon E5-4669 v4Intel Xeon E5502Intel Xeon E5503Intel Xeon E5504Intel Xeon E5506Intel Xeon E5507Intel Xeon E5520Intel Xeon E5530Intel Xeon E5540Intel Xeon E5603Intel Xeon E5606Intel Xeon E5607Intel Xeon E5620Intel Xeon E5630Intel Xeon E5640Intel Xeon E5645Intel Xeon E5649Intel Xeon E7-2850 v2Intel Xeon E7-2870 v2Intel Xeon E7-2880 v2Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2Intel Xeon E7-4809 v2Intel Xeon E7-4820 v2Intel Xeon E7-4830 v2Intel Xeon E7-4850 v2Intel Xeon E7-4860 v2Intel Xeon E7-4870 v2Intel Xeon E7-4880 v2Intel Xeon E7-4890 v2Intel Xeon E7-8850 v2Intel Xeon E7-8857 v2Intel Xeon E7-8870 v2Intel Xeon E7-8880 v2Intel Xeon E7-8880L v2Intel Xeon E7-8890 v2Intel Xeon E7-8891 v2Intel Xeon E7-8893 v2Intel Xeon Gold 5115Intel Xeon Gold 5117Intel Xeon Gold 5117FIntel Xeon Gold 5118Intel Xeon Gold 5119TIntel Xeon Gold 5120Intel Xeon Gold 5120TIntel Xeon Gold 5122Intel Xeon Gold 5215Intel Xeon Gold 5215LIntel Xeon Gold 5215MIntel Xeon Gold 5217Intel Xeon Gold 5218Intel Xeon Gold 5218BIntel Xeon Gold 5218NIntel Xeon Gold 5218RIntel Xeon Gold 5218TIntel Xeon Gold 5219YIntel Xeon Gold 5220Intel Xeon Gold 5220RIntel Xeon Gold 5220SIntel Xeon Gold 5220TIntel Xeon Gold 5222Intel Xeon Gold 6126Intel Xeon Gold 6126FIntel Xeon Gold 6126TIntel Xeon Gold 6128Intel Xeon Gold 6130Intel Xeon Gold 6130FIntel Xeon Gold 6130TIntel Xeon Gold 6132Intel Xeon Gold 6134Intel Xeon Gold 6134MIntel Xeon Gold 6136Intel Xeon Gold 6138Intel Xeon Gold 6138FIntel Xeon Gold 6138TIntel Xeon Gold 6140Intel Xeon Gold 6140MIntel Xeon Gold 6142Intel Xeon Gold 6142FIntel Xeon Gold 6142MIntel Xeon Gold 6144Intel Xeon Gold 6146Intel Xeon Gold 6148Intel Xeon Gold 6148FIntel Xeon Gold 6150Intel Xeon Gold 6152Intel Xeon Gold 6154Intel Xeon Gold 6208UIntel Xeon Gold 6209UIntel Xeon Gold 6210UIntel Xeon Gold 6212UIntel Xeon Gold 6222Intel Xeon Gold 6222VIntel Xeon Gold 6226Intel Xeon Gold 6226RIntel Xeon Gold 6230Intel Xeon Gold 6230NIntel Xeon Gold 6230RIntel Xeon Gold 6230TIntel Xeon Gold 6234Intel Xeon Gold 6238Intel Xeon Gold 6238LIntel Xeon Gold 6238MIntel Xeon Gold 6238RIntel Xeon Gold 6238TIntel Xeon Gold 6240Intel Xeon Gold 6240LIntel Xeon Gold 6240MIntel Xeon Gold 6240RIntel Xeon Gold 6240YIntel Xeon Gold 6242Intel Xeon Gold 6242RIntel Xeon Gold 6244Intel Xeon Gold 6246Intel Xeon Gold 6246RIntel Xeon Gold 6248Intel Xeon Gold 6250Intel Xeon Gold 6250LIntel Xeon Gold 6252Intel Xeon Gold 6252NIntel Xeon Gold 6254Intel Xeon Gold 6256Intel Xeon Gold 6258RIntel Xeon Gold 6262Intel Xeon Gold 6262VIntel Xeon Gold 6269YIntel Xeon L5506Intel Xeon L5520Intel Xeon L5530Intel Xeon L5630Intel Xeon L5638Intel Xeon L5640Intel Xeon Platinum 8124MIntel Xeon Platinum 8153Intel Xeon Platinum 8156Intel Xeon Platinum 8158Intel Xeon Platinum 8160Intel Xeon Platinum 8160FIntel Xeon Platinum 8160MIntel Xeon Platinum 8160TIntel Xeon Platinum 8164Intel Xeon Platinum 8168Intel Xeon Platinum 8170Intel Xeon Platinum 8173MIntel Xeon Platinum 8175MIntel Xeon Platinum 8176Intel Xeon Platinum 8268Intel Xeon Silver 4108Intel Xeon Silver 4109TIntel Xeon Silver 4110Intel Xeon Silver 4112Intel Xeon Silver 4114Intel Xeon Silver 4116Intel Xeon Silver 4208Intel Xeon Silver 4210Intel Xeon Silver 4214Intel Xeon Silver 4215Intel Xeon Silver 4216Intel Xeon W-2102Intel Xeon W-2104Intel Xeon W-2123Intel Xeon W-2125Intel Xeon W-2133Intel Xeon W-2135Intel Xeon W-2140BIntel Xeon W-2145Intel Xeon W-2150BIntel Xeon W-2155Intel Xeon W-2170BIntel Xeon W-2175Intel Xeon W-2191BIntel Xeon W-2195Intel Xeon W-2223Intel Xeon W-2225Intel Xeon W-2235Intel Xeon W-2245Intel Xeon W-2255Intel Xeon W-2265Intel Xeon W-2275Intel Xeon W-2295Intel Xeon W-3175XIntel Xeon W-3235Intel Xeon W-3265Intel Xeon W3503Intel Xeon W3505Intel Xeon W3520Intel Xeon W3530Intel Xeon W3540Intel Xeon W3550Intel Xeon W3565Intel Xeon W3570Intel Xeon W3580Intel Xeon W3670Intel Xeon W3680Intel Xeon W3690Intel Xeon W5580Intel Xeon W5590Intel Xeon X5550Intel Xeon X5560Intel Xeon X5570Intel Xeon X5647Intel Xeon X5650Intel Xeon X5660Intel Xeon X5667Intel Xeon X5670Intel Xeon X5672Intel Xeon X5675Intel Xeon X5677Intel Xeon X5680Intel Xeon X5687Intel Xeon X5690Intel Xeon X5698

Change GPU
AMD Radeon HD 6850AMD Radeon HD 6870AMD Radeon HD 6950AMD Radeon HD 6970AMD Radeon HD 6990AMD Radeon HD 7750AMD Radeon HD 7790AMD Radeon HD 7850AMD Radeon HD 7950AMD Radeon HD 7970AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz EditionAMD Radeon HD 7990AMD Radeon R7 250AMD Radeon R7 265AMD Radeon R7 370AMD Radeon R9 270AMD Radeon R9 280AMD Radeon R9 280XAMD Radeon R9 285AMD Radeon R9 290AMD Radeon R9 290XAMD Radeon R9 295X2AMD Radeon R9 380AMD Radeon R9 380XAMD Radeon R9 390AMD Radeon R9 390XAMD Radeon R9 FURYAMD Radeon R9 FURY XAMD Radeon R9 NanoAMD Radeon RX 460AMD Radeon RX 470AMD Radeon RX 480AMD Radeon RX 550AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GBAMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GBAMD Radeon RX 560AMD Radeon RX 5600 XTAMD Radeon RX 570AMD Radeon RX 5700AMD Radeon RX 5700 XTAMD Radeon RX 580AMD Radeon RX 590AMD Radeon RX 6600 XTAMD Radeon RX 6700 XTAMD Radeon RX 6800AMD Radeon RX 6800 XTAMD Radeon RX 6900 XTAMD Radeon RX Vega 56AMD Radeon RX Vega 64AMD Radeon VIIATI Radeon HD 4870NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030NVIDIA GeForce GT 640NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 TiNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GBNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GBNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 TiNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 TiNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPERNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPERNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 TiNVIDIA GeForce GTX 260NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 TiNVIDIA GeForce GTX 560NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 TiNVIDIA GeForce GTX 570NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 TiNVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti BoostNVIDIA GeForce GTX 660NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 TiNVIDIA GeForce GTX 670NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 TiNVIDIA GeForce GTX 760NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 TiNVIDIA GeForce GTX 950NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 TiNVIDIA GeForce GTX TITANNVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACKNVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN XNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPERNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPERNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPERNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 TiNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 TiNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 TiNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 TiNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090NVIDIA TITAN RTXNVIDIA TITAN VNVIDIA TITAN Xp

Change Resolution
1080p1440p4KUltrawide 1440p

Change Settings
Ultra SettingsHigh SettingsMedium SettingsLow Settings

AMD A8-3850 review: AMD A8-3850

The new A-Series desktop processors round out AMD’s Fusion CPU family, and make AMD the second processor manufacturer this year to combine a standard desktop chip with an embedded graphics processor on a single piece of silicon. Intel was the first, with its second-generation Core series (formerly known as Sandy Bridge) that debuted in January. While AMD’s approach is generally not as fast as Intel’s in terms of traditional processing power, it has drawn on the resources of its Radeon graphics business to provide the A8-3850 chip with impressive 3D performance for its price of $135. We can recommend AMD’s new chip as a low-cost gaming platform and for multithreaded applications, but many users will still get faster general performance from an equivalent Intel chip.

AMD has not competed well with Intel in recent years, in part due to Intel’s relentless pursuit of ever-more-efficient CPU manufacturing processes. In combination with the fact that Intel owns its own manufacturing facilities, compared with AMD which has to use other companies’ plants, the result has been that Intel’s CPUs have maintained a dollar-for-dollar performance lead over AMD’s since Intel first introduced its Core 2 Duo chip family in mid-2007.

Aside from that manufacturing competition, this latest generation of CPUs represents a major step in what’s been a slow shift in the way we think about computing. Traditionally, CPUs handle application processing duties, and GPUs (graphics processing units) were meant for gaming and dedicated video processing programs. Since Intel’s Core CPUs launched earlier this year, and really as early as the 2008 debut of Nvidia’s CUDA technology, those lines have blurred. Now, applications ranging from Adobe Creative Suite 5 and Flash 10.1 to Windows 7, Internet Explorer 9, and Firefox 4.0 can use the graphics processor to speed up performance, particularly when it comes to rendering visual elements. Windows’ translucent Aero visual theme, for example, supports GPU acceleration.

As Intel did with Sandy Bridge, AMD has rolled a graphics chip directly into its new A-Series processor designs. The A8-3850, reviewed here, offers the equivalent of four Phenom II CPU cores combined with an AMD Radeon HD 6550 graphics core. The result is a chip designed to handle the demands of different processing workloads quickly and efficiently.

Price	$135	$139
Number of physical cores/processing threads	4/4	2/4
Maximum CPU clock speed	2.9GHz	3.1GHz
L2 cache	4x1MB	2x256KB
L3 cache	NA	3MB
Manufacturing process	32nm	32nm
Maximum memory speed	1,866MHz DDR3 SDRAM	1,333MHz DDR3 SDRAM
Embedded graphics core	AMD Radeon HD 6550	Intel HD Graphics 3000
Graphics core clock speed	600MHz	850MHz

AMD is sticking with very mainstream price points and clock speeds for its new CPU. The A8-3850 is the most high-end chip of the four announced. A $119, the A6-3650 has a clock speed of 2.6GHz, with A8-3800 and A6-3600 variants filling in the price bands in between. The latter two chips use AMD’s Turbo Core technology, which dynamically ramps up the core CPU clock speed according to the workload, similar to Intel’s Turbo Boost feature. Unlike Turbo Boost, Turbo Core provides only a marginal speed increase to the chips that use it, and the bump applies to all four cores simultaneously. Intel’s Turbo Boost has a broader range of clock speeds, and can apply a speed boost to individual cores as workloads demand.

Intel’s dual-core Core i3 2105 CPU is the closest competitor to the fixed-frequency A8-3850 in terms of price. Although the Intel chip has a faster core clock speed, it has only two physical processing cores. Intel’s Hyper-Threading technology virtualizes an additional processing thread on each core, and in that way the Core i3 2105 mimics the behavior of a quad-core CPU. In contrast, the A8-3850, and all of AMD’s new desktop chips, each have four physical processing cores.

Apple iTunes encoding test (in seconds)
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)

Intel Core i3 2105 (1,333MHz RAM)

111 

AMD A8-3850 (1,600MHz RAM)

155 

AMD A8-3850 (1,333MHz RAM)

158 

Adobe Photoshop CS3 (in seconds)
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)

Intel Core i3 2105 (1,333MHz RAM)

83 

AMD A8-3850 (1,600MHz RAM)

104 

AMD A8-3850 (1,333MHz RAM)

109 

Adobe Photoshop CS5 image-processing test (in seconds)
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)

Intel Core i3 2105 (1,333MHz RAM)

250 

AMD A8-3850 (1,600MHz RAM)

322 

AMD A8-3850 (1,333MHz RAM)

352 

Multimedia multitasking (in seconds)
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)

Intel Core i3 2105 (1,333MHz RAM)

403 

AMD A8-3850 (1,600MHz RAM)

429 

AMD A8-3850 (1,333MHz RAM)

442 

Cinebench 11. 5
(Longer bars indicate better performance)

Rendering multiple CPUs

Rendering single CPU

AMD A8-3850 (1,333MHz RAM)

3.46 

0.88 

AMD A8-3850 (1,600MHz RAM)

3.38 

0.87 

Intel Core i3 2105 (1,333MHz RAM)

3.01 

1.24 

As you can see from our application performance tests, AMD’s new A8-3850 isn’t quite ready to compete with Intel on file conversion and other traditional multimedia tasks. The Core i3 2105 outperformed the A8-3850 in almost every application test, including our Photoshop CS5 test, which uses filters that can benefit from GPU processing capabilities. We thought that if the AMD chip and its beefy graphics core had a shot it would be on that test, but it seems that’s not the case.

Interestingly, for programs that are focused on multicore CPU processing, like our Cinebench test, the A83850 and its four native CPU cores will outperform Intel’s simulated four-core chip. This makes for a rather complicated competitive landscape. Do you opt for a CPU with strong single-core performance, strong multicore performance, or strong GPU computing performance? No vendor can claim superiority across all three processing strategies, which means you must either pick based on the design of the applications you use most commonly, or look for a chip that offers the best all-around performance. With many programs still reliant on single-core processing speed, Intel seems like the safest choice. For gamers (as you’ll see below) or users of multicore applications, we’d suggest AMD.

Also, note that you can see measurable performance gains from the AMD chip if you opt for 1,600MHz DDR3 RAM instead of 1,333MHz sticks. Even though the extra RAM speed doesn’t allow the A8-3850 to overtake Intel, the 1,666MHz memory showed gains of 30 seconds in our Photoshop CS 5 test, and just under 15 seconds in our multimedia multitasking test. While we can’t recommend the new AMD chip at this price if you need fast performance in digital media applications, we can at least say that using faster memory with the A8-3850 has real benefits. A quick scan of Newegg shows that 1,600MHz RAM will only cost about $5 more than equivalent 1,333MHz RAM, a relatively modest premium.

Far Cry 2 (in fps)
(Longer bars indicate better performance)

1,440×900 (DirectX 10, 4x aa, very high)

AMD A8-3850 (1,600MHz RAM)

23.4 

AMD A8-3850 (1,333MHz RAM)

19.6 

Intel Core i3 2105 (1,333MHz RAM)

9.5 

Metro 2033 (in fps)
(Longer bars indicate better performance)

1,600×1,080 (low detail)

AMD A8-3850 (1,600MHz RAM, DirectX 10)

18. 7 

AMD A8-3850 (1,333MHz RAM, DirectX 10)

18 

AMD A8-3850 (1,333MHz RAM, DirectX 11)

16.7 

AMD A8-3850 (1,600MHz RAM, DirectX 11)

16.7 

Intel Core i3 2105 (1,333MHz RAM, DirectX 10)

11.8 

While AMD may lag behind Intel in certain kinds of application performance, the A8-3850’s 3D graphics capabilities considerably improve the outlook for budget gaming desktops. Even at low resolution and image quality, Intel’s HD Graphics 3000 core can’t provide a playable Far Cry 2 experience. AMD’s Radeon HD 6550, particularly with the faster memory, offers nearly three times the performance.

The A8-3850’s advantage on the more demanding Metro 2033 is less dramatic, but still noticeable. Here the AMD chip offers marginally better performance in DirectX 10 mode than in DirectX 11. Intel’s chip offers only DirectX 10 support, but even compared with the A8-3850’s worst DirectX 11 frame rate, the Core i3 is still about 50 percent slower.

Between these two scores, with Far Cry 2 representing a very forgiving game, and Metro 2033 among the most demanding, we can say that while you would still enjoy a better gaming experience with a discrete graphics card, the AMD A8-3850 and its Radeon HD 6550 graphics core offer impressive PC gaming capabilities for the price. As AMD has done before, if you add a lower-end Radeon HD 6000-series card to a desktop with the A8-3850, the two will work together, in a sort of budget dual-graphics card mode. A more high-end graphics card won’t receive a boost from the embedded CPU graphics core, but paired with a Radeon HD 6750, for example, AMD says the A8-3850 will provide roughly between 10 percent and 25 percent more performance than you’d see from the 6750 card by itself.

Due to the new architecture, AMD’s new chips will require new motherboard chipsets as well. You’ll find AMD’s new A55 and A75 chipsets in motherboards from the usual third-party vendors. Our test board, an ASRock A75 Pro4, comes in on the higher end, but offers a modern assortment of ports, including four USB 3.0 inputs, five SATA III ports, and two PCI Express graphics card slots, the most we’ve seen on one motherboard. You also get HDMI, VGA, and DVI video outputs, and dual-monitor support. The motherboard also supports 6GBps SATA inputs.

The A55 variants have USB 2.0 jacks only, and support only SATA II storage devices. AMD’s new platform can also support 3D Blu-ray playback. That might not be the most popular feature, but home-theater PC builders may appreciate it, and it’s not a feature supported by Intel’s second-gen Core platform.

AMD A8-3850	Average watts per hour
Off (watts)	0.019
Sleep (watts)	2.95
Idle (watts)	49. 17
Load (watts)	113.67
Raw (annual kWh)	201.926322
Annual power consumption cost (@$0.1135/kWh)	$22.92

Our power consumption comparison was thwarted somewhat by the fact that the Intel Z68 motherboard wouldn’t work with our admittedly old 500-watt Antec Neo HE 500 power supply. To keep things equal, we tested both systems with a 1,000-watt PSU, but that much wattage is completely overkill for these CPUs, and the resulting power efficiency comparison was not representative of the power draw you’d see from desktops using these chips. With a more typical power supply, the AMD A8-3850 offered power efficiency that seemed to improve on that of older AMD chips with similar performance, like the 2.9GHz AMD Phenom II X4 810T CPU in the HP Pavilion P6720f. In any case, the A8-3850’s power draw even in our unoptimized test bed was impressive. We’d expect a vendor-built system with a more efficient power supply and strategically selected power management features to offer even greater efficiency.

Conclusions
Budget gamers in particular should be excited about AMD’s new family of APU desktop chips due to their strong 3D performance. We’d hoped to see faster graphics processing in Photoshop CS5 as well, but Intel’s standard CPU performance superiority seems to give it the edge there and with programs that rely on more traditional CPU processing. If you regularly use a program designed to make use of multiple processing cores, the A8-3850 is a better choice. Regardless of situational hair-splitting, AMD’s A8-3850 is robust enough to offer an acceptable computing experience, and its 3D processing power, both by itself and in conjunction with a lower-end Radeon graphics card, should make this chip popular, particularly among mainstream gamers.

Test system configurations:

AMD test bed
Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit; 2.9GHz AMD A8-3850; ASRock A75 Pro4 motherboard; 8GB 1,600MHz DDR3 SDRAM/1,333MHz DDR3 SDRAM; 512MB ATI Radeon HD 6550 embedded; 500GB, 7,200rpm Western Digital SATA II hard drive

Intel test bed
Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit; 3. 1GHz Intel Core i3 2105; 8GB 1,333MHz DDR3 SDRAM; Intel DZZ68DB motherboard; 64MB Intel HD Graphics 2000 embedded; 500GB, 7,200rpm Western Digital SATA II hard drive

Which is Better for Gaming?

Which processor brand should you be looking at in the mid-range market? AMD’s Ryzen 5? Or Intel’s Core i5? In this post, we compare Intel’s i5 series and AMD’s Ryzen 5 series to help you determine which option is right for you.

When it comes to Intel vs AMD for gaming, the battle often takes place in the midrange. AMD’s Ryzen 5 and Intel’s Core i5 lineups host some of the best gaming CPUs in each generation. This is because they tend to offer an unrivalled balance of gaming performance on the one hand and a reasonable price on the other.

High-end CPUs aren’t usually recommended just for gaming unless money is of no concern, because your money is often better spent on one of the best graphics cards which should net you better performance than a CPU upgrade. AMD Ryzen 5 and Intel Core i5 CPUs are great in this respect because they usually hit that sweet spot that occurs just before diminishing price-performance returns come into play, making them the perfect choice for gaming.

The middle of AMD’s ‘Zen 3’, 5000-series range, Intel’s ‘Rocket Lake’, 11th Gen range, and Intel’s ‘Alder Lake’, 12th Gen range is more inviting for gaming than the low- or high-end of these ranges. For AMD this means the Ryzen 5 5600X, and for Intel this means either the Core i5-11600K or the Core i5-12600K. We’re going to focus on the former Intel chip because the latter’s price and stock levels haven’t yet settled, and there aren’t many 12th Gen motherboards retailing at present.

Table of Contents

1. AMD Ryzen 5 Overview

2. Intel Core i5 Overview

3. AMD Ryzen 5 vs Intel Core i5

4. Best Value: Intel Core i5-11400F

5. Best for Gaming: Ryzen 5 5600X

6. Best out of the Box: Intel Core i5-11600K

7. Most Promising: Intel Core i5-12600K

AMD Ryzen 5 Overview

AMD’s Ryzen 5 5600X hit the market in the final quarter of 2020, and it’s still holding strong. Retailing for about $300, this 6-core, 12-thread CPU offers a great balance of multi-threaded power and single-threaded grunt. With a base clock of 3.7GHz and a boost clock of 4.6GHz, it can handle any moderate workload with ease, and it’s a dab hand at gaming, too, being able to keep up with the most powerful graphics cards on the market without bottlenecking them, even topping many of the gaming benchmarks for this CPU generation before Alder Lake hit the market.

The Ryzen 5 5600X costs more than Intel’s 11th Gen competing options, but price differences aren’t always what they seem. For instance, while this chip costs more than the i5-11400F or i5-11600K, the i5-11400F’s stock cooler isn’t great, and the i5-11600K doesn’t come with a cooler at all – and don’t forget that the best gaming coolers often let you squeeze out extra performance from your chip. Plus, the Ryzen 5 5600X might work out cheaper if you already own a B400-series motherboard capable of housing the 5600X with a simple BIOS update.

However, these price conundrums are often rendered irrelevant in 2021 thanks to chip shortages which seem to be impacting AMD more than Intel – sometimes, you just have to take what you can get.

Intel Core i5 Overview

Intel’s Core i5-11400F is the stand-out chip of its Rocket Lake generation. But whether you should opt for it depends on whether you’re comfortable, and have a motherboard that will support, unlocking this chip’s power limits. At stock settings, this $157-MSRP CPU boasts 6 cores, 12 threads, a base clock of 2.6GHz and a boost clock of 4.4GHz, with an all-core boost of up to 4.2GHz.

These numbers don’t scream ‘competitive’, but the magic happens when you unlock the Core i5-11400F’s power limits in the BIOS. When these limits are lifted, this chip comes close to the performance of the more expensive Intel Core i5-11600K and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X. Bear in mind, though, that it lacks integrated graphics, so you’ll have to run a graphics card alongside it.

Moving on to the Intel Core i5-11600K, this CPU was almost the stand-out chip of the Rocket Lake generation, but not quite, thanks to the i5-11400F. But even though the i5-11400F exists, the i5-11600K is still very competitive. Retailing for about $260, this 6-core, 12-thread chip offers a 3.9GHz base clock and a 4.9GHz boost clock. Its clock multiplier is unlocked, too, meaning it can be manually overclocked if it sits in an overclocking-compatible motherboard. Getting good returns from manual overclocks is very difficult with Intel’s 11th generation, though, so unless you’re a real overclocking enthusiast it’s probably better to save your energy.

As far as real-world performance goes, at stock settings the Core i5-11600K should beat – albeit only slightly – a power level-unlocked Core i5-11400F both when gaming and when undertaking multi-threaded workloads. It should also run neck-and-neck, or only a little behind, a Ryzen 5 5600X at stock settings, and yet costs a fair amount less.

The final chip to consider is Intel’s new Core i5-12600K. This ‘Alder Lake’ chip, retailing for around $320, combines ‘P-Cores’ and ‘E-Cores’ on a single die – the former core type is designed to deal with more strenuous tasks, the latter with background tasks. The i5-12600K has 6 P-Cores, 4 E-Cores, and 16 threads, with a P-Core boost clock of 4.9GHz.

The upshot is that this chip performs significantly better in many multi-threaded tasks than both the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X and 5800X, and the i5-12600K also matches or slightly edges in front of both of these chips in many games. But, for such a new chip with potential pricing and stock volatility, not to mention so few motherboard options, it’s too soon for a proper price-performance verdict.

AMD Ryzen 5 vs Intel Core i5

Intel Core i5-11400F: Best Value

The best value chip from the AMD Ryzen 5 and Intel Core i5 bunch is definitely the Intel Core i5-11400F. For a $157 MSRP, this chip is cheaper than the Intel Core i5-11600K and much cheaper than the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X.

Its performance measures only a sliver behind these two more expensive CPUs – but there’s a caveat: it only performs so well when its power limits are unlocked in the BIOS, which essentially gives it an easy all-core overclock.

This means you’ll need a motherboard that allows the CPU’s power limits to be unlocked and that has a good VRM, and you’ll probably also need a third-party CPU cooler that can handle the heat. But, providing you have the motherboard and cooler for it, and providing you have a graphics card running alongside it to compensate for its lack of integrated graphics, the Core i5-11400F is unrivalled in terms of price-performance.

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X: Best for Gaming

The best midrange CPU for gaming at the moment, not including Intel’s 12th Gen, seems to be the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X. I say ‘seems’ because there are slim deltas between the gaming performances of all three of these midrange CPUs, and these deltas will likely almost disappear on higher resolutions when paired with anything other than an Nvidia RTX 3090. In fact, the same can be said for any current-gen midrange or high-end CPU: they’re all roughly equal in terms of gaming performance. But slight differences still count.

When it comes to raw gaming performance, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X wins, even if only just. This isn’t surprising, because we all know that AMD Ryzen is good for gaming and has been since its first generation’s inception. In fact, in some gaming benchmarks the 5600X can be seen competing with the most expensive high-end processors on the market. And while good overclocking results are never guaranteed, the Ryzen 5 5600X seems to offer more overclocking headroom than Intel’s Core i5 options. While each game is different – there are certainly games where Intel Core i5 CPUs will perform better than the 5600X – the 5600X seems to perform better in more of them. This is especially true when it comes to eSports titles like Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. So, while it’s not a landslide win, the gaming victor is the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X.

Intel Core i5-11600K: Best out of the Box

Despite the great value of the Core i5-11400f and the stellar gaming performance of the Ryzen 5 5600X, it’s not all hopeless for the Core i5-11600K. For one, with the i5-11600K you get great out-of-the-box performance that beats the stock-limited i5-11400F by a large margin, and that still beats it by a smaller margin when the i5-11400F is running at full power. We see similar performance deltas in multi-threaded tasks, too. Compared to the Ryzen 5 5600X, while it loses by a slim margin in gaming and by a bigger margin in multi-threaded workloads, the i5-11600K holds its own and is more than justified by its cheaper price tag. This is only exacerbated by the 5600X’s stock issues which have often led to the red team’s chip costing even more than intended.

The ultimate win for the i5-11600K, then, is its great out-of-the-box performance. Such competitive performance from the i5-11600K doesn’t requiring any BIOS tinkering or overclocking, and it comes with integrated graphics unlike the i5-11400F, all for a lower price than the Ryzen 5 5600X. If you want something that’s more likely to be in stock than its AMD competitor, offers great value, can be unboxed, plugged in under a CPU cooler, and booted up, all the while being confident that you’re getting close to the best CPU gaming performance out there, the i5-11600K is your best bet.

Intel Core i5-12600K: Most Promising

Intel’s Core i5-12600K is the most promising chip on the market at the moment. Its new architecture which mashes together P- and E-Cores works surprisingly well, giving us a midrange CPU with 16 threads that beats its competition handily in productivity tasks and only a little less handily in games. Intel’s 12th Gen platform also offers a great deal with DDR5, PCIe 5.0, and XMP 3.0 support.

Unfortunately, it’s too soon to give this chip a full verdict, because pricing and stock fluctuations are likely to occur, and a full range of compatible motherboards will likely only hit the market next year.

Plus, Microsoft still has some issues to smooth over for Alder Lake’s CPU task scheduling. It’s definitely the processor to look out for, though, because it looks like it could be the very best gaming CPU considering price and performance.

---

More Articles Like This…

• Intel Core i3 vs i5 vs i7 vs i9: Which CPU is Best?
• AMD Ryzen 5 vs Intel Core i5: Which is Better for Gaming?
• 7 CPU Intensive Games for Benchmarking Your Processor
• Dedicated Graphics Card vs. Integrated Graphics
• Best Budget Gaming PC Builds

What is AMD Equivalent to Intel Core i5?

Comparing AMD to Intel is like comparing oranges to tangerines. That said, the closest AMD equivalent for an Intel Core i5 you can find is the AMD Ryzen 5. This is a mid-tier line of processors which offer competitive price to performance ratios.  

AMD has gained a lot of traction in recent times, eventually locking horns in the battle for processor supremacy with Intel. With top-of-the-line chips across all price points, many might wonder, what is AMD equivalent to Intel Core i5.

A direct comparison is not possible, however, because even in the Core i5 and Ryzen 5 families, there are numerous CPU models that vary in performance across generations and even within generation.

But the common notion here is that AMD Ryzen 5 and Intel Core i5 are most reasonable for those looking for performance and value. When in doubt, go for a mid range Intel Core i5 or AMD Ryzen 5 processor. Whether you are building a gaming, productivity or work PC, these mainstream lines of processors can handle your tasks very well.

They excel in terms of single core performance particular. In fact, the single core performance of a Core i5 and Ryzen 5 is on par with their Core i7 and Ryzen 7 counterparts.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

What is AMD Equivalent to Intel Core i5?

 

Ryzen 5 is the AMD equivalent to Intel Core i5.  It is as simple as that. It denotes a line of processors that has been winning users to the “Team Red” since April of 2017 with the first generation, Ryzen 5 1600X.

When comparing both the Intel Core i5 and the AMD Ryzen 5 within a generation, they are more or less the same in performance.

Generally though, when it comes to single core performance, the Intel takes the cake. When it comes to multi-core performance AMD takes take cake.

However, this is not always the case particularly with the recent generation of Ryzen processors. AMD has improved their performance by leaps and bounds and thus you should check out benchmark results such as Cinebench R20 or R23 for better understanding of a particular processor you want to compare.

But again when comparing performance and value, Intel Core i5 and AMD Ryzen 5 are close rivals. Comparing AMD Ryzen 5 with any other Intel Core series such as i3, or i7 would not be fair in terms of price point particularly.

Also Read:

• Is a Dual Core Processor Good for Gaming?
• Is a Quad Core Processor Good for Gaming?

Characteristics of AMD Ryzen 5 Processors

Ryzen 5 refers to a family of AMD processors that share a few characteristics.

• They come in two common configurations, 4 cores 8 threads, and 6 cores with 12 threads.
• There are three variant i.e Desktop base WITHOUT integrated graphics, Desktop based WITH integrated graphics, and laptop/mobile based.
• Unlike Intel where most of the Intel Core series processor feature an integrated graphics, with AMD, only a handful of processors with ‘G’ suffix, offer an integrated graphics.
• They feature a lot of overclocking potential. Unlike Intel Core processors where only the “K” series processors are overclockable, with AMD, all Ryzen 5 processors are overclockable.

AMD Ryzen 5 Generations and Top of The Line CPUs

Like the Intel Core i5 series, the Ryzen 5 series also has different generation with each generation significantly better than the previous.

The current AMD generation of chips is the 5^th. This features the series 5000 processors that were released in the fourth quarter of 2020.

Let us look at the performance and specs of some of the top of the line Ryzen 5 newer gen processors.

• AMD Ryzen 5 5600X: Desktop based, top of the line 5000 series Ryzen 5 processor. Desktop based. 6 cores and 12 threads. 3.7 GHz – 4.6 GHz clock speed.
• AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT: Desktop based, from the older 3000 series. Ryzen 5 3600 XT also features 6 cores, 12 threads but base clock speed of 3.8 GHz, Max clock speed of 4.5 GHz.
• AMD Ryzen 5 5600G: Desktop based. APU, meaning it has an integrated graphics. 6 Cores / 12 threads. Speeds of 3.9 GHz – 4.4 GHz base and boost frequency respectively
• AMD Ryzen 5 5600H: Laptop based. To of the line mobile processr. 6 Cores and 12 thread. 3.3 GHz – 4.2 GHz clock speed.

Also Read: What is a Good Processor Speed for a Laptop?

Characteristics of Intel Core I5 Processors

The Core i5 lineup is aimed at users with demanding power requirements. However, it is affordable enough to be mainstream.

The characteristics are almost identical to Ryzen 5 processor. The newer 10th and 11th Gen Core i5 processors also feature 6 cores and 12 threads like the newer Ryzen 5 processors.

Intel Core i5 Generations and Top of The Line Processors

The current generation of Intel Core i5 processors is the 11th gen. However, due to the lower price tag, the 10th Gen Intel Core i5 processors are also quite famous.

It should be noted that in addition to a better performance from the 11th gen processors compared to the 10th gen processors, the 11th gen CPUs also have 20 PCIe Lanes compared to 16 on the previous gens.

Also Read: What are PCIe Lanes?

• Intel Core i5-11600K: Desktop Based – The flagship Intel Core i5 processor of the latest 1tth generation.  The processor features 6 cores and 12 threads. It offers a higher base and max clock speed of 3.90 GHz and 4.90 GHz respectively.
• Intel Core i5-10600K and 10600KF: Desktop Based. The “KF” variant does not features an integrated graphics card. Both have 6 cores and 12 threads. Both have 4.1 GHz – 4.8GHz clock speed. Both are overclockable.
• Intel Core i5 11400H: Flagship laptop/mobile based Intel Core i5 processor. 6 cores/ 12 threads. 2.60 – 4.40 GHz.

Benchmark Results Comparison

The Intel Core i5 11600K, 10600K, 10600KF, and the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X are the top performers in their lineups.

Let us now look at how the processors compare using benchmark.

The free tool lets you compare and benchmark your CPU performance with tests based on real-world computer usages.

For instance, let us compare the single and multi core performance of the Intel Core i5 -11600K vs the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X using the Cinebench R20 benchmark and Passmark Benchmark results.

Intel Core i5 -11600K vs the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

Cinebench R20 Single Core Performance

• AMD Ryzen 5 5600X: 604
• Intel Core i5-11600K: 598

As far as the single core performance goes in this bechmark, the results are quite comparable.

Cinbench R20 Multi Core Performance

• AMD Ryzen 5 5600X: 4562
• Intel Core i5-11600K: 4293

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600X seems to take the cake in terms of its multi-core performance.

Passmark Single Core Score

• AMD Ryzen 5 5600X: 3380
• Intel Core i5-11600K: 3380

Again, according to Passmark scores, both have similar single core performance.

Passmark Overall Score

• AMD Ryzen 5 5600X: 22191
• Intel Core i5-11600K: 19932

The overall winner in the Passmark benchmark is AMD Ryzen 5 5600X owing to its better multi-core performance.

Note On Single Core and Multi Core Performance

When comparing processors, you must look at both its single and multi core performance.

This is because certain apps and tasks are more reliant on single core. In other words, they do not utilize all cores. On the other hand, there are other tasks that leverage multiple CPU cores.

Games like FPS, RPG, online MMORPG games, and professional work like designing in CAD or working in the timeline are all highly single core based tasks.

On the other hand, games like strategy and simulation games and work like rendering, encoding are multicore reliant.

Therefore, you have to gauge your needs well. In most cases, for gamers and most intermediate professionals, Single Core performance should be the more important characteristic to look at.

Also Read: Is a Quad Core Processor Good for Gaming?

Complete Comparison of Top Intel Core and Ryzen 5 Processor

The following table compares the top processors from their respective category in the Core i5 and the Ryzen 5 series.

Product	Type	Single Core Cinebench R20 Score	Multi Core Cinebench R20 Score	Passmark Score	Clock Speed Base / Boost
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X	Desktop	604	4562	22191	3. 7/4.6 GHz
Intel Core i5 11600K	Desktop	598	4293	19932	3.9/4.9 GHz
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT	Desktop	519	3855	18842	3.8/4.5 GHz
Intel Core i5 10600K	Desktop	501	3629	6	4.1/4.8 GHz
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G	Desktop (W/O iGPU)	574	4511	19959	3.9/4.4 GHz
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	Laptop	—	—	18309	3.3/4.2 GHz
Intel Core i5 11400H	Laptop	—	—	17901	2.6/4.4 GHz

Also Read:

• What is AMD Equivalent to Intel Core i3?
• What is AMD Equivalent to Intel Core i7?
• What is AMD Equivalent to Intel Core i9?

Conclusion

So to reiterate the answer to what is AMD equivalent to Intel Core i5, it is AMD Ryzen 5. However, when drawing up a comparison, you have to take into consideration the generation and the type of processor.

For instance, you cannot take a laptop based Intel Core i5 processor and compare it with a desktop based Ryzen 5 processor. Laptop based processor are far weaker than their desktop counterparts and hence this comparison will not work.

Also Read: How to Check How Many CPU Threads Do I Have

AMD A8-3800 vs Intel Core i5-3330: What is the difference?

Smartphone-graphic wire headphones

29 Ballla

A8-3800

37 BALLLA

Intel Core i5-3330

Winner at

VS

64 facts compared to

AMD A8-0002 AMD A8-0002 AMD A8-0002 AMD A8-0002 AMD A8-0002 AMD A8-0002 AMD A8-0002 AMD A8-0002 AMD AL 3330

Why is AMD A8-3800 better than Intel Core i5-3330?

• 266MHz higher RAM speed?
  1866MHz vs 1600MHz
• 3MB more L2 cache?
  4MB vs 1MB
• 12W below TDP?
  65W vs 77W
• 256KB more L1 cache?
  512KB vs 256KB
• 0. 75MB/core more L2 cache per core? more memory bandwidth?
  29.8GB/s vs 25.6GB/s
• 32GB more max memory?
  64GB vs 32GB
• 0.1 newer version of OpenCL?
  1.2 vs 1.1

Why is Intel Core i5-3330 better than AMD A8-3800?

• 25% higher CPU speed?
  4 x 3GHz vs 4 x 2.4GHz
• GPU frequency 50MHz higher?
  650MHz vs 600MHz
• Semiconductor size 10nm smaller?
  22nm vs 32nm
• 1.81x higher PassMark result?
  5885 vs 3249
• 0.5GHz higher turbo clock speed?
  3.2GHz vs 2.7GHz
• 1 is the PCI Express (PCIe) version newer?
  3 vs 2
• 1.91x higher PassMark score (single)?
  1695 vs 886
• Has AES?

What are the most popular comparisons?

AMD A8-3800

VS

Intel Core i5-4258U

Intel Core i5-3330

VS

Intel Core i3-7100

A8-3800

VS

AMD ATHLON II X4 64000 9000 3

VS

Intel Core i3-4130

AMD A8-3800

VS

Intel Core i3-2348M

Intel Core i5-3330

VS

Intel Core i7-37770

A8-3800

vs

AMD A6-3600

Intel Core i5-3330

VS

Intel Core i5-3470

AMD A8-3800

VS

AMD A6-3500

Intel Core i5-3330 9000 9000

AMD Phenom II X4 AMD A8-3800

VS

AMD A8-3870K

Intel Core i5-330

VS

AMD Phenom II X4 965

A8-3800

VS

Intel Core I222 ° Intel Core INTEL

. Core i5-3330

vs

Intel Core i3-8100

A8-3800

VS

AMD FX-6300

Intel Core i5-3330

VS

AMD FX-6300

AMD A8-3800

VS 9000 VS 9000 VS

AMD AMD PHE II X4 965

Intel Core i5-3330

VS

Intel Core i7-2600

A8-3800

VS

AMD A4-3300

Intel Core i5-3330

9000 VS

AMD PRO A8 -8650B

Price comparison

User reviews

Performance

1.CPU speed

4 x 2.4GHz

4 x 3GHz

CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second a processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.

2nd processor thread

More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.

3.speed turbo clock

2. 7GHz

3.2GHz

When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

4. Unlocked

✖AMD A8-3800

✖Intel Core i5-3330

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and can be easily overclocked for better performance in games and other applications.

5.L2 cache

More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

6.L3 cache

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-3800)

More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

7.L1 cache

More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

8.core L2

1MB/core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

9. L3 core

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-3800)

1.5MB/core

More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

Memory

1.RAM speed

1866MHz

1600MHz

Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.

2.max memory bandwidth

29.8GB/s

25.6GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3rd DDR memory version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-3800)

DDR (Dynamic Dynamic Random Access Memory, Double Data Rate) is the most common type of main memory. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.

4.Memory channels

More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.

5.Maximum memory

Maximum memory (RAM).

6.bus baud rate

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-3800)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.

7.Supports memory troubleshooting code

✖AMD A8-3800

✖Intel Core i5-3330

The memory error recovery code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-3800)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-3330)

The newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.

9.bus frequency

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-3800)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-3330)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device

Geotagging

1. PassMark result

This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.

2. PassMark result (single)

This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-3800)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-3330)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

4. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-3800)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-3330)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-3800)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-3330)

Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-3800)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-3330)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7. Blender test result (bmw27)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-3800)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-3330)

Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

8.Blender result (classroom)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-3800)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-3330)

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

9.performance per watt

This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.

Functions

1.uses multithreading

✖AMD A8-3800

✖Intel Core i5-3330

processor cores into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.

2. Has AES

✖AMD A8-3800

✔Intel Core i5-3330

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3. Has AVX

✖AMD A8-3800

✔Intel Core i5-3330

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.

4.Version SSE

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5. Has F16C

✖AMD A8-3800

✔Intel Core i5-3330

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.

6.bits transmitted at the same time

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-3800)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-3330)

NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.

7. Has MMX

✔AMD A8-3800

✔Intel Core i5-3330

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

8.Has TrustZone

✖AMD A8-3800

✖Intel Core i5-3330

The technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and streaming video using Digital Rights Management (DRM) technology ).

9.interface width

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-3800)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-3330)

The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which CPUs are better?

This page is currently only available in English.

AMD A8-9600 APU Review — Very Budget Games

The reasons why I switched from a blue T-shirt to a red golf can be found here. Now — the promised review of one of the most affordable AMD processors on the market. It is average in its own line, therefore it does not provide exorbitant capacities, but you cannot call it weak either — for its price, in any case. This, pepper is clear, is about the APU AMD A8-9600.

[socialmart-widget id=”IWiijFTY” search=”AMD A8-9600″]

one.
AMD A8-9 Processor Package and Unboxing600

1.1. Characteristics of APU

1.2. Performance A8-9600

1.3. Results for AMD A8-9600

The processor comes in a box with a cooler, instructions and a sticker. By the way, the cooler is pre-applied with good thermal paste, far from budget “snots” at 5 kopecks per liter. But the devil would spit in your ear — is it really impossible to write on the box that the paste was applied in advance? Because some do not know this, and out of habit they put the cooler as a heat sink on a freshly bought sofa, which can now be called “AMD Edition”, since it is impossible to remove a stain from thermal paste.

But don’t say anything, but the processor is beautiful. Spiked, with a plump heat spreader, it is inserted simply, it is clamped securely. The cooler is also installed in two spats, much easier and more convenient than Intel’s. Despite the fact that the fan is small, 80 millimeters, if not less, it makes noise only after the first start of the system and after resetting the BIOS. The rest of the time, even the hard drive is louder.

Specifications APU

AMD A8-9600 is an honest quad-core fellow with built-in Radeon R7 video about six video cores. The base frequency is 3100 MHz, in Turbo mode it is 300 MHz higher. The cat wept for the cache, 512 KB L2 and 64 KB L1 per core — and there is no L3 cache at all. PCI-E support is available, and the third revision, but only x8. Virtualization is supported, as are the FMA4, AVX, and AES instruction sets. That is, we have such a “AMD Celeron” in front of us, slowly chewing information, but with four honest cores. It’s also one of AMD’s cheapest APUs, supporting DDR4 memory up to 2400MHz, dual-channel, and up to 64GB.

But the video core is more interesting. It is the vaguely named Radeon R7 with a base core clock of 900 MHz, six graphics cores, 384 shader cores, and a maximum video memory of up to 2 GB. There is support for DirectX 12 and Vulkan. Judging by the characteristics, the video block is slightly better than the R7 240, which in turn is slightly more powerful than the NVIDIA GT 730. The total TDP is 65 W, like the Intel Core i5-6500, from which I moved to the A8-9600. Which is logical — we have the same 4 honest cores and an integrated video chip.

A12-9800, the older brother of the hero of the review, is quietly chasing up to 4.8 GHz, and videos with A8 overclocking to 4.1 GHz on a stock cooler are walking around the network. However, as it turned out during testing, only ASUS motherboards support overclocking the 9600, and only they, thanks to the «experimental BIOS». This was confirmed — my MSI B350M Pro-VDH could not overclock the chip at all, even by +100 MHz, even by +900. Voltage up to an adequate stop, playing with the parameters, replacing the stock cooler with an air cooler from be quiet! — nothing helped. Or rather, I managed to overclock, and high frequencies were shown, but any hint of a load reset them to standard ones. And this despite the fact that the unlocked multiplier is officially confirmed by the processor page on the AMD website.

The temperature of the AMD A8-9600 with the system unit open does not rise above 48 degrees even in AIDA64 stress tests, although it can jump up to 50 if the video core is also loaded to the limit, say, by playing 4K video. Monitoring through the MSI Command Center and HWiNFO64 showed 25 degrees Celsius both in idle and under load. However, it is worth clarifying that I almost immediately put a be quiet! cooler on the A8! Shadow Rock TF2 with a maximum TDP of 165 W, so I did not expect any problems.

Now about the cons. For this processor to work properly, you will need to completely reinstall the system if, like me, you are moving to AMD from Intel. There is also an option to uninstall the chipset drivers if you don’t want to reinstall your system, but AMD recommends starting from scratch. And I warn you right away — until you update Windows to the limit, do not expect stable work. A freshly installed OS through CPU-Z could not even recognize the A8-9600, confusing it with the FX-6300, or something like that, I lost the screenshot. There is, however, a possibility that this is a problem with the old version of CPU-Z, but who knows?

I also advise you to check the quality of your RAM before moving to AM4. I have two 8 GB sticks, GeIL and AFOX, not the most expensive and far from the most compatible. And I will say right away — not only Ryzen is picky about this matter. In dual-channel mode, I constantly had crashes while testing games in the most unexpected places. And the stronger the load on the video chip, the more frequent crashes. Changing the position of the dice on the motherboard — and I put them a little wrong in the heat and heat — slightly improved the situation, I was able to conduct tests in 3DMark, but the crashes did not stop completely.

Read also: Cougar Deathfire EX kit review (keyboard and mouse) — combat rainbow

Performance A8-9600

In general, the performance of the chip, excluding constant crashes, is much higher than the Intel Core i5-6500 with HD Graphics 530. For example, Batman: Arkham Knight didn’t even run on the 530, unlike the R7. However, the performance varies from game to game — in DOOM at the minimum in FullHD, Intel took over by 2-3 FPS, displaying 24 frames at the first open level. In GTA V, on the contrary, the A8 beat the i5-6500 by as much as 10 frames, demonstrating 30 FPS versus an average of 20. In other games, the A8-9600 either took over, or was at the level … Naturally, until a crash happened.

General table of average FPS in games (minimum graphics settings, HD resolution):

these results were earned by one of the cheapest processors on the market WITHOUT a discrete graphics card AT ALL. What’s more, it did even better than my previous Core i5 and some Core i7s. For comparison, the 7700K at the same settings produced 40% more frames, although it costs 7 times more ($380 vs. $62).

See also: RN FAQ #14: SATA vs M.2 using Transcend as an example

Luckily for me and the review, Kingston bailed out my fresh red ass by providing a 2666 MHz HyperX 2×8 kit. And compatibility brought stability!

Not only crashes disappeared, but also glitches in Premiere Pro, and the project that had gobbled up 28 gigabytes was opened and completed without problems. However, the RAM frequency had to be lowered to 2133 MHz, because even at 2400 the system would not start.

Testing in 3DMark showed 1681 points for Fire Strike, including 1942 points for graphics, 4182 for physics and 592 for math … that is, for the combined test. Throwing in 300 points is the result of my old Core i3-4130 and GTX 650 2GB machine, but even now this set costs $50 more.

On the whole, I am satisfied with the result, because I was not sure of a clear victory of one side or another in the game application. The fact is that the i5-6500 has excellent four cores, but a bottleneck in the form of a weak video chip. A8-9600, in turn, can only boast of a video chip, but the processor cores are weaker. The forces seemed equal — but they were not very. The A8 is clearly more powerful for gaming. The speed of the system, of course, is higher in the case of Intel, but the rendering of video files is almost the same everywhere in terms of speed.

See also: How much RAM does a PC need in 2017?

Again, the lack of processor power is compensated by the acceleration of the video adapter, and since both the HD Graphics 530 and the Radeon R7 use Mercury Playback for this purpose, pure power decides. But the stability of the system suffers terribly under load — for example, in a heavy render scene in Premiere Pro, I encountered a glitch when the program started to devour all the RAM in the system, and then the swap file, and after the 28th gigabyte it solemnly hung the system .

Regarding overclocking in general. The A8-9600 — surprise, surprise — isn’t the optimal processor for the job. For example, my MSI B350M Pro-VDH motherboard has several overclocking tools, including A-XMP specifically for AMD memory, and OC Genie 4 for fast CPU overclocking. A8 does not support either, nor XMP in general.

CPU power consumption is expected. When running DOOM, I got an impressive 93 watts per system unit alone in DOOM. This seems to be a lot, considering that my Core i5 pulled 30% less even at maximum loads. But it is worth remembering that the A8 has a discrete video core in five minutes, so the appetite is obvious. In addition, in idle mode, the system consumed only 50-60 watts, which is almost the same as Intel. In an attempt to disperse the little one to 3.9GHz indicator went off scale for 130 watts.

Before the results, a few words about competitors. We talked about the G4560 — this is a slightly different field. As for the Ryzen 3 1200, for a price 50% higher, the chip offers the same frequencies, but 10 megabytes more cache and memory support up to 3200 MHz, but it lacks a video core and needs a companion video card, which increases the cost of the solution one and a half times — two. This is clearly not the initial stage of a PC upgrade — for someone it can be the final one.

As for the cost, the processor was bought for 1800 hryvnias ($66) in the CAN.ua store. This is not the best, but one of the cheapest options.

Read also: RN FAQ #11: How to choose a processor for a PC — AMD vs Intel

AMD A8-9600 Summary

For all its cons, the processor is a vital element of the ecosystem called AM4. AMD A8-9600 is a balanced budget model, with a processor and a video core of approximately the same power, the best option for many purposes, including moving to a new, promising socket without much money, but with a further reserve for an upgrade. The smartest solution for an HTPC or a simple gaming system, and with luck — and the potential for overclocking. And of course — one of the best foundations for further moving to Ryzen.

The shortcoming of the A8-9600 rests on the almost military requirement for RAM. The kit, which I exploited without problems and mercilessly with the Core i5-6500, turned out to be simply unsuitable for the AM4 socket. However, if you are 100% moving to Ryzen, then I recommend selling the old one and buying the best possible RAM, like the GeIL EVO X RGB or HyperX Fury kits.

If you are building a system from scratch and on a minimal budget, you can take a 2×4 GB kit, the main thing is dual-channel operation and maximum compatibility between two dies if you plan to use the video core to the fullest. If not, then one good die for 8 GB 2400 MHz is enough. Well, as for the further upgrade for me personally, the Ryzen 5 1600 and GTX 1060 6GB will be the very thing.

Compare AMD A6 6310 and Intel Core i3 4130

The choice of processor is one of the most important decisions that affect the performance of a computer or laptop, so you should at least know what to expect from it

When choosing, each wants to get the best. There are not many tasks here. Usually they ask what is the best manufacturer amd or manufacturer intel, which generation, which line and which manufacturer.

Regarding which processor is better than amd or intel, then everyone is inclined towards intel, and they are correspondingly more expensive.

Usually they rush between intel core2 duo, pentium, celeron, atom, i3, i5, i7 in search, but if you choose, for example, for games, then it’s not a fact that intel core i5 will be better than i3, since there are many of those and those .

The wrong choice of computing device can lead to a deep sense of dissatisfaction, for example, when you are a gamer and accidentally bought a strictly office model.

Unfortunately, this will not pass painlessly, because the insight into change comes too late.

There are significant differences among systems installed in desktop PCs, which makes it difficult to make a quick decision.

ATTENTION: when choosing a processor, it is imperative to determine whether it is compatible with the computer’s motherboard — how to do this is described here.

The number of cores, confusing symbols, Turbo mode, multipliers — such a flow of information, most buyers are in a stupor.

They don’t understand what’s what and rely on the experience of retailers who are not always competent in these matters, but are well versed in marketing.

• More cores (4 vs. 2) allows more processes to run simultaneously, speeding up computer performance and processing speed
• More L2 cache (2 MB vs. 0.5 MB) allows the processor to access data faster
• Larger L2 cache per core: 0.5 MB/core vs. 0.25 MB/core
• Higher critical temperature (90°C vs. 72°C) allows the processor to operate in harsher temperatures
• High frequency integrated video processor: 800 MHz vs 350 MHz

Which is the best processor of the Intel Celeron line

For desktop computers, the cheapest dual-core Celeron processors that use the modern energy-efficient Haswell architecture, thus providing good performance in mainstream applications.

Work with spreadsheets, documents, tests, surf the net or watch movies with Celeron will not be a problem.

It’s important to note that the integrated Intel HD graphics chip eliminates the need for an external graphics card, allowing you to keep your computer costs down if you’re interested in gaming.

Social networking sites are available to hobbyists — Celeron is up to the task. The series includes the following models (in all sections, the lower the better):

• Celeron G1840T — 2500 MHz -> two cores / two threads / Intel HD.
• Celeron G1840 — 2800 MHz -> 2 cores / 2 threads / Intel HD.
• Celeron G1850 — 2900 MHz -> two cores / two threads / Intel HD.

Celerons, due to their budgetary nature, are recommended for people with the least requirements, on a very limited budget.

For example, the Celeron G1840 build is suitable for creating a small media center connected to a TV or a home file server, taking a minimum amount of energy, so they can be passively cooled.

Features

Their advantage over weaker brothers is higher clock speed, but the price is still low. Although the manufacturer did not create them for entertainment, ie. technically advanced games, in combination with an external graphics card, perform well in games that do not use more than two cores. Unfortunately, people who are looking to the future should consider buying something faster. The Pentium line includes the following models: Pentium G3240T — 2700 MHz -> 2 cores / 2 threads / Intel HD. Pentium G3440T — 2800 MHz -> 2 cores / 2 threads / Intel HD. Pentium G3240 — 3200 MHz -> 2 cores / 2 threads / Intel HD. Pentium G3258 — 3200 MHz -> 2 cores / 2 threads / Intel HD. Pentium G3440 — 3300 MHz -> 2 cores / 2 threads / Intel HD. Pentium G3450 — 3400 MHz -> 2 cores / 2 threads / Intel HD. Pentiums are inexpensive — the price depends on the configuration. Since Intel HD is integrated into them, they can work successfully without an external video card. These solutions are admittedly weak, but easily allow you to display your desktop, watch a movie, or play a simple game. The latest Pentium celebrated its 20th birthday, which the manufacturer celebrated with the release of a limited overclocking G3258 processor. It’s an interesting choice for the budget-conscious enthusiast. Instructions supported AMD A6 6310 Intel Core i3 4130 mmx sse sse2 sse3 ssse3 sse4 sse41 sse4a sse42 amd64 AMD_V AVX AVX_20 BMI1 F16C AES F16C F16C F16C F16C F16C F16C F16C0775 Which is the best Intel Core i3 processor The Core i3 certainly belongs to the higher league than the Celeron and Pentium processors. It supports Hyper Threading technologies, doubling the number of supported threads and improving the efficiency of parallel computing. The dual-core processor can perform up to four operations simultaneously. But here you must clearly understand that such a function must be supported by the operating system and the application being launched. Thus, the advantage of Hyper Threading may not always work, but on the latest games it is immediately noticeable. The series includes the following models: i3-4150T — 3000 MHz -> two cores / 4 threads / Intel 4400 HD. i3-4350T — 3100 MHz -> two cores / 4 threads / Intel 4600 HD. i3-4150 — 3500 MHz -> two cores / 4 threads / Intel 4400 HD. i3-4350 — 3600 MHz -> two cores / 4 threads / Intel 4600 HD. i3-4360 — 3700 MHz -> two cores / 4 threads / Intel 4600 HD. Core i3 fourth generation that can be used for various tasks. While players recommend investing in a Core i5 Quad, the Core i3s also provide decent liquidity, especially when paired with NVIDIA GeForce graphics whose drivers enable Hyper Threading. In addition, Core i3 processors have their own integrated Intel HD 4000 cards, which are much faster than those found in Celeron and Pentium, allowing you to run more modern games.

25600 MB/s

Maximum memory

32768 MB

other models in the same system.

The first — four cores and support for Hyper Threading, doubling the number of threads supported in parallel, that is: a quad-core processor can perform up to eight operations simultaneously.

Of course, this function must be supported by the operating system, as well as the application being launched. The second thing is the Turbo Boost mode, in which the clock speed is automatically increased to very high values, reaching up to 4400 MHz, providing owners with uncompromising performance. The series includes models:

1. i7-4785T -> 2200 MHz — 3200 MHz Turbo / 4 cores / 8 threads / Intel 4600 HD.
2. i7-4790T -> 2700 MHz — 3900 MHz Turbo / 4 cores / 8 threads / Intel 4600 HD.
3. i7-4790S -> 3200 MHz — 4000 MHz Turbo / 4 cores / 8 threads / Intel 4600 HD.
4. i7-4790 -> 3600 MHz — 4000 MHz Turbo / 4 cores / 8 threads / Intel 4600 HD.

Until recently, the Core i7 required specialized software that was able to take advantage of Hyper Threading.

Nowadays, more and more games are starting to use Hyper Threading, such as Crysis 3.

Core i7 processors have integrated graphics, these are among the fastest among all models designed for the desktop market.

AMD builds strength

Intel continues to lose ground to its main competitor, AMD, in almost all segments of the processor market. AMD is stepping up the offensive, and there’s little to no match against Intel in terms of performance and cost at the moment.

Engadget published a devastating article analyzing Intel’s failures resulting from incorrect pricing and too slow development and innovation rates compared to AMD.

AMD’s triumph is underlined by the fact that in the ranking of the top 10 most popular processors in the world, compiled by the major online store Amazon based on the preferences of its customers, the vast majority of positions are occupied by AMD chips. For example, in the UK and Germany, AMD holds six out of ten spots, indicating that those who prefer to build their own PCs, not trusting ready-made builds, are more likely to choose Ryzen chips over Core processors.

Ryzen processors are becoming more attractive to users

Intel is gradually yielding to AMD, unable to cope either with the required production volumes of its processors (it even turned to Samsung for help in this matter), or with the transition to modern technical processes. Most Intel chips are still 14nm despite the debut of the 10nm Ice Lake series in August 2021, while AMD has long embraced 7nm.

The never-ending struggle

But despite AMD’s best efforts, Intel continues to hold the leading position. 2.5 years is not enough to displace her from the first place, which she held for more than 10 years.

According to analyst firm Mercury Research, AMD reached 18% share in the desktop processor segment in Q3 2021, up 5% year-on-year, even as the company experienced a number of technical difficulties in the production of Ryzen 3000 series processors.

AMD owns the server market by 4.3% against 2.74% a year ago. Analysts at Mercury Research have suggested that by the end of 2020 AMD’s share in this segment will exceed 10%. In the field of mobile processors, AMD is also in second place with a score of 14.7%.

• Choose the best virtual VPS/VDS server on Market.CNews

Elyas Kasmi
Share Short link

⇡#Conclusions

this direction is AMD. Having developed a new concept, the manufacturer meticulously thought out its implementation in hardware, so if you are looking for a basis for an inexpensive gaming system, and the performance provided by modern integrated graphics does not disgust you, you need to stop the choice on the Socket FM1 platform and processors of the family Llano. Although these hybrid processors are based on a fairly old microarchitecture, they look very confident in real applications and are in no way inferior to the newfangled Sandy Bridge of similar price even with a purely computing load. When the graphics core comes into play, representatives of the Llano family leave the Core i3 no chance of revenge at all.

Intel’s attempts to somehow raise the graphics performance of its own processors to a competitive level by introducing a faster version of the graphics core into them turned out to be doomed to failure. The difference in performance between AMD and Intel integrated graphics processors is so great that the best Intel HD Graphics 3000 core is almost 40% behind even the simplified Radeon HD 6530D core, not to mention the full-fledged Radeon HD 6550D. In addition, the graphics offered by Intel do not provide the proper level of functionality, since it does not support modern DirectX 11 and OpenCL programming interfaces.

Unfortunately, Intel will not be able to change the current situation with some cosmetic measures. And announcements of products like the Core i3-2125 have no effect on the balance of power in the hybrid processor market. Really serious changes can happen only with the release of fundamentally new products, for example, promising Intel Ivy Bridge processors. They will implement both a faster graphics core and support for all the necessary APIs. And just then, perhaps, we will be able to write an article about real competition in the APU market.

What’s next

AMD is developing new processors that are ideal for gaming PCs and laptops. Intel, however, can still prevent its failure in this segment — if it manages to release 10nm gaming chips before AMD introduces its new products, then it will be able to maintain its leadership, since 10nm Core, according to its own Intel will be faster than competitors from the Ryzen camp by 10% with less power consumption.

AMD roadmap

But she needs to do this before AMD officially launches Zen 3. Given that the development of the 10nm process technology has stretched for four long years for Intel, it may not be in time. Meanwhile, Lisa Su has promised that Zen 3 will provide a 15 percent jump in performance over Zen 2 while reducing power consumption «dramatically». This could pave the way for AMD to enter the high performance gaming laptop segment.

Reviews of Athlon X2 340

The two-core aflon itself is obsolete. But yes, it’s not possible to play normally on two cores with two threads now. In my opinion, the minimum for games is the Xeon E5450 or Q9650 (overclocked to 3.5). Under it can be set to 460, and the same 750 (Or 7850 — 7870). You can try to get this processor, an interesting test will turn out) 320 bit 12 gb ddr3 now I want to disperse the baby to its very limit, do not tell me how much it can be max dispersed. and if anyone fumbles explain how and how much voltage to raise.

The meaning of the processor is not enough at \»max \» … 650 is not enough to play at max, you had to slow down the settings. And 560se will be more powerful. At the same time, do not forget: the processor does not suffer at all from most graphics settings.

Tags:3.2 GHz, 65W, AMD, Athlon X2 340, CPU

Blitzkrieg AMD

Intel’s troubles began in Q1 2021 when AMD released its first-generation 14nm Zen architecture in an active takeover market through the release of affordable processors that are not inferior in their capabilities to Intel products. For example, at that time Intel i7-6900 with eight cores on board cost around $1100, and AMD responded in March 2021 with the release of Ryzen 7 1800X for $500. A little later, in August 2021, the top-end Threadripper 1950X with 16 cores was released for $1000. At that time, Intel had a Core i9-7980XE with 18 cores ready, which outperformed AMD’s brainchild in performance, but with a small difference in capabilities, it was estimated at $2000.

AMD’s next target, according to Engadget, was the workstation processor segment. With the release of the 12nm Zen+ architecture in April 2021, it developed the 32-core Threadripper 29 based on it.90X for $1800, which was practically in no way inferior to the top-end Intel Xeon W-3175X for $3000 at that time.

A few months later, Intel released the i9-9980XE for $2,000, to which AMD responded with a 16-core Ryzen 9 3950X asking $750 for it. It surpassed its competitor in terms of clock speeds and overall performance, but at the same time it cost almost three times cheaper. Intel countered with the release of the $ 1000 Core i9-10980XE with 18 cores, but this was still not enough — AMD had rivals prepared for it, more expensive, but also more powerful. They were 24- and 32-core Threadripper 3960X and 3970X for $1400 and $2000 respectively.

Lisa Su, Head of AMD

In July 2021, the official launch of the 7nm Zen 2 architecture took place, although AMD demonstrated the first processors based on it even earlier, at the very beginning of 2021. In total, AMD needed only 2.5 year, in order to seriously scare Intel, forcing it to take drastic measures, including a sharp decrease in the cost of its old processors.

Similarity Intel Atom and Intel Celeron

• The processors are in the same price category.
• Both platforms have the same cache size.
• The technological process of the platforms is the same and equal to 14HM.
• Maximum TDP — the indicator showing heat dissipation is identical, equal to 6 W.
• The performance of Atom and Celeron processors with four cores is almost the same.
• Tests that measure the performance of all cores and threads and in game and application mode showed similar results between platforms.
• The speed of operation in complex applications is identical.

Specifications Intel Atom

The Intel Atom is a range of microprocessors. The Intel Atom family is represented on the market by a series of several platforms with one, two and four computing cores. Processors have three positive parameters: speed, price and energy efficiency. The Intel Atom is an improved version of the Intel Pentium. It is designed according to a system that allows you to significantly reduce the cost of installing some elements and, accordingly, reduce the price of the final product. This was facilitated by the location of the memory controller and video card on the same chip.

The power of Intel Atom allows you to get the best out of your netbooks, nettops and other mobile devices. One of the main advantages of Atom is low power consumption, the calculated power of which does not exceed 40 W . Initially, Atom included two series of platforms: Z for tablets and nettops, and N for netbooks. They are manufactured using the 45nm process technology. Models also support Hyper-Threading.

⇡ # Results of graphic tests

The second part of the tests is gaming applications. Here, the APU’s power is fully utilized, since the graphics core is loaded with processing and output of 3D graphics.

In addition to the results of gaming tests, we also conducted an OpenGL benchmark from the Cinebench package, which characterizes APU performance when working with professional graphics.

In graphical tests, the picture is changing — we are no longer talking about any equality. The HD Graphics 3000 graphics core, which Intel has taken care of introducing into desktop processors, certainly seriously improves performance. On the example of our tests, we can state about a 50% advantage of the Core i3-2125 over the Core i3-2120 with a slow two thousandth graphics modification. However, for the Core i3-2125 to be able to compete at least with the cheaper AMD A6-3650, this is clearly not enough. The advantage of AMD’s APUs in 3D graphics workloads is overwhelming, and Intel has obviously lost this round of competition.

And if we add the lack of support for DirectX 11 in Intel’s APUs to the results shown in the diagrams, then the situation for the current solutions of this manufacturer seems even more hopeless. Only the next generation of the Ivy Bridge microarchitecture can fix it, the Carlow graphics core in which will receive additional execution units, OpenCL support, and DirectX 11 compatibility. parts of the screen resolution and image quality settings allow you to play almost any modern game without resorting to the services of an external video card. Intel’s APU options, on the other hand, deliberately put an end to the most demanding games, so using them as the basis of a budget gaming system is not the most reasonable choice.

Comparison of AMD Ryzen 5 or Intel Core i5 processors.

Choosing the best

The best processors for gaming laptops

Modern games are the locomotive of progress in computer systems. To create virtual reality, 3D engines generate millions of polygons, apply shadows and reflections, repeating this dozens of times per second. Calculations require huge computing power, as a result, a lot of heat is generated.

Modern mobile processors have learned to strike a balance between heat dissipation and speed, invalidating the oxymoron «gaming laptop». And if recently Intel reigned supreme in this market with their Core 5-7-9, then in 2021, productive systems based on AMD Ryzen 7 chips show at least no worse speed. Next — the top best processors for gaming laptops.

4Core i9-8950HK

Cost 7 Performance 10 Power consumption 7

Total rating, calculated as an average of the sum of the main parameters.

8.0Score

Pros

• Top performance
• Multi-threaded cores
• Overclocking capabilities

Cons

• High heat generation
• Weak integrated graphics
• High price of the chip (Hyper-threading).

  Base frequency — 2.91 GHz, multiplier unlocked, overclockers can catch it up to 4.3 GHz on all cores or up to 4.8 GHz on one. No wonder i9hot as morning coffee — heat dissipation reaches 45 W — you need a spacious case, a thick heat pipe and a resourceful propeller. Gigahertz wins — 14 thousand units according to the PassMark test give a performance-per-watt ratio of 319.

  The integrated graphics chip Intel UHD Graphics 630 is weak, modern games alone cannot pull. Paired with a powerful discrete card, such as the GeForce GTX 1080, the CPU will unfold in full force, raising the FPS to almost a hundred.

  3Core i7-7820HK

  Intel officially allows overclocking, frequencies change from 2.9 GHz to 3.9 GHz, up to 45 W of power goes into heat — without cooling, the chip will simply evaporate. The PassMark test estimates the chip at 10 thousand parrots, the costs reduced to Watts are 223, which is not bad for such a boiler.

  The Intel HD Graphics 630 video chip is put on display, as it will not be able to unleash the potential of the processor. In gaming laptops with flagship vidyuhi fresh «Assassin» produces up to 90 frames / sec.

  2 Core i5-8300H

  Cost 9 Performance 9 Energy consumption 8

  Overall rating, calculated as an average of the sum of the main parameters.

  8.7 Access

  Plus

  • Good speed
  • The price is half the flagship
  • Dynamic frequency setting
  • Farms as a kettle of
  • Simple GPU
  • Simple GPU
  • Similar to the simplified Core i5 family, in 2019is produced on the basis of the new Coffee Lake structure. The plate has 4 cores with multithreading support, in fact, 2 more virtual computers in each.

    The CPU can dynamically change the frequency of the cores from 2.3 to 4 GHz, but the multiplier is locked — lovers of «turn on the gas» should choose another model. The heat pack has not changed, the same 45 W of power supplied for heating — a cooler is required.

    Luckily, the big cache is the same as the i7: 256 KB / 1 MB / 8 MB, so the overall performance didn’t drop much. PassMark index fell to 9.5 thousand, or 210 units per watt. But the price of the stone is two times less than that of the flagship i9. You can ignore the integrated Intel UHD 630 graphics, it is extremely weak for games.

    1Ryzen 7 2700U

    Cost 8 Performance 9 Power consumption 10

    Total rating, calculated as the average of the sum of the main parameters.

    9.0Rating

    Pros

    • Competitive i5 speed
    • Price one third less than i5
    • Reduced heat transfer

    disadvantages

    • TOPU AMD is slower I7
    • The multiplication multiplier multiplication multi -built graphics

    AMD in 2021 acts with the Ryzen processor, organized by the architecture of Zen (RAVE) players, and the blue competitor got nervous. The quartet of cores provides processing of up to 8 parallel streams, while the frequency floats from 2.2 to 3.8 GHz (feature Precision Boost), but without manual overclocking — the multiplier is locked.

    Thermal package optimized for notebooks with only 15W. With such a modest heat transfer, the reduced performance reaches 490 units per watt. The stone heats up slightly, while giving PassMark quite competitive 7342 points. And all this at a price not exceeding the Core i5.

    Additionally, a slow AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 card is implanted on silicon, but together with the GeForce GTX 1050, the laptop shows up to 40 FPS at high settings in Battlefield 1.

    Intel Core i5 — Overview

    As mentioned above, it makes sense to compare only similar generations of «stones». In particular, we are talking about the Kaby Lake and Coffee Lake families, and the 7600K and 8600K models, respectively.

    None of them support multithreading. The Core i5 7600K is quad-core, while the 8600K is six-core. The clock frequency of the first is 3.8 GHz, and the second is 3.6 GHz. In «turbo» mode, they are capable of overclocking up to 4.2-4.3 GHz. The 7600K has 6 MB L3 cache, while the 8600K has 9 MB. MB.

    Both chips are equipped with an integrated video card anyway — Intel UHD Graphics 620 for the older one and UHD 630 for the newer one. True, its performance is quite average. Both models also support DDR4 RAM.

    In general, it looks like the Core i5 loses to Ryzen 5. The competitor from AMD will have more cores, and there is multithreading, and as much as 16 megabytes of cache memory. But not everything is so clear.

    The best processors for a powerful ultrabook

    Thanks to Apple for introducing ultrabooks to us. Three-kilogram boxes have been replaced by thin books that work for hours and cope with HD video encoding — the best choice for a journalist, blogger or system administrator. Such strict requirements are provided by special calculators — powerful, but at the same time economical.

    CPUs with the letter U in the code name operate at a reduced supply voltage (ULV) and tightly control heat dissipation, typically at 15 watts. The developer can further adjust this parameter, achieving the perfect balance.

    The best processors for powerful ultrabooks are produced by Intel, but AMD with the new Ryzen is not far behind them either. Details — further.

    4Core i7-8550U

    Cost 7 Performance 10 Power consumption 10

    Overall rating, calculated as an average of the sum of the main parameters.

    9.0Rating

    Pros

    • Decent performance
    • Outstanding energy efficiency
    • Load based frequency tuning

    Cons

    • Cannot be manually overclocked
    • Non-gaming graphics co-processor
    • High processor price

    8th generation i7 processor based on Kaby Lake Refresh microarchitecture. Unlike the seventh generation, obviously with an eye on AMD, it has 4 cores with a dual computing thread.

    Turbo Boost technology allows you to change the clock speed depending on the load within the range of 1.8 — 4.0 GHz, but the possibilities for experimental overclocking are disabled.

    Improved process technology called «14nm+», the thermal regime is made sparing — only 15W per chip. In the PassMark synthetic test, the calculator shows a score of 8313 stars, which provides an outstanding performance per watt — 554.

    The chip has an integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 card — if you do not play games, the speed is enough for any office tasks, including graphics and video encoding .

    Read on the siteRating of the best processors for smartphones

    3Core i5-8250U

    Cost 10 Performance 8 Power consumption 9

    Overall rating, calculated as an average of the sum of the main parameters.

    9.0 Estisus

    Plus

    • Good price ratio
    • High energy efficiency
    • Widespread frequency tacuations

    Minutes

    • There is no field for experiments with overcloking
    • simple integrated schedule

    8th generation mid-range master computer uses Kaby Lake-R block diagram. In it, the number of cores with parallel Hyper-threading calculations has been increased to four.

    The operating frequencies are almost doubled — from 1. 6 to 3.4 GHz, but the setting is performed only by the automatic Turbo Boost algorithm — inquisitive enthusiasts have no access to the multiplier.

    Low power 14nm crystal, TDP limited to 15W — ideal for mobile devices. Limits slightly reduced performance — PassMark shows 7686 points, but the figures are impressive — 512 units per watt.

    The integrated UHD Graphics 620 graphics co-processor is not relevant for gaming, but it can handle office work well.

    2Core i3-8130U

    Cost 9 Performance 8 Power consumption 8

    Total rating, calculated as an average of the sum of the main parameters.

    8.3Rating

    Pros

    • Good microprocessor price
    • Decent power efficiency
    • Auto-tuning

    Cons

    • Blocked multipliers
    • Slow graphics chip

    Powerful laptops can also be produced on the basis of budget i3, the eighth generation of Intel processors based on the Kaby Lake microarchitecture helps engineers with this. In it for the first time for the i3, Turbo Boost technology is used, which automatically changes the clock frequency from 2.2 to 3.4 GHz.

    A couple of cores received the Hyper-threading parallel computing mode — if you count by virtual cores, you get four of them. Together with a large 4 MB L3 cache, they show good speed — 5069chips according to PassMark — only 1.5 times less than i7.

    Especially for ultrabooks, the thermal pack is clamped within 15 W, so the energy efficiency is also decent — 338.

    The graphics chip is the same as in the entire eighth series — UHD Graphics 620 — good for Photoshop and Premiere, but slow for fashion 3D games.

    1Ryzen 5 2500U

    Cost 7 Performance 9 Power Consumption 9

    Overall rating, calculated as an average of the sum of the main parameters.

    8.3 -certificate

    Plus

    • Frequency setting
    • Excellent energy efficiency
    • Good built -in graphics

    Minuses

    • No manual acceleration
    • High price

    Modern seed Lenovo, Acer and HP are sure of it. The mid-range processor is based on the Zen hierarchy and has four cores processing two threads at a time (for a total of eight logical cores).

    The clock generator is controlled by Precision Boost logic, which smoothly changes the frequency from 2.0 to 3.6 GHz. Unfortunately, overclocking fans have nothing to catch here, multipliers are not set by hand.

    The optimal power package of the crystal is set to 15 W, despite this, the CPU shows excellent performance comparable to the i5 — 7311 flags or 487 units per watt.

    Interestingly, the internal video chip Radeon Vega Mobile Gfx is twice ahead of the Intel graphics — on this platform you can assemble not only office, but also inexpensive gaming machines.

    AMD Ryzen 5 at a glance

    AMD Ryzen 5, if we talk only about top models, are six-core chips with multi-threading support. That is, they are capable of processing up to 12 computational threads simultaneously. The base clock frequency in both generations is 3. 6 GHz, and the maximum is 4.2 GHz for the more recent one.

    They also feature 16MB L3 cache and 95W TPD. The chips are oriented to work with DDR4 RAM. In general, these are the usual high-end configurations, but not top-end ones.

    Some models are also equipped with an integrated graphics card of the Radeon Vega series, which, in principle, is quite productive — but only if high-frequency RAM is used. The integrated «graphics» of both models can be compared with the discrete NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030, providing sufficient frame rate for many games.

    The Best Mid-Price Notebook Processors

    To fit in the mid-range price range, notebook manufacturers have to make trade-offs, such as choosing cooler processors or using older generation chips.

    Intel and AMD engineers have prepared for this by refining the already well-known lines of mobile processors with the letter U with a limited 15 W TDP. Savings on chips manifest themselves in various forms — the number of cores is reduced, auto-tuning circuits are turned off, and the amount of cache memory is reduced.

    All this reduces the overall performance, so average laptops are no longer strong in new games, but they are purchased not for fun, but for texts, layout or calculations. Below is a selection of the best processors for mid-range laptops.

    4Core i7-7500U

    Cost 7 Performance 10 Power consumption 8

    Overall rating, calculated as an average of the sum of the main parameters.

    8.3 -certificate

    Plus

    • Excellent performance in the segment0031

    The seventh generation computer is structured according to the Kaby Lake architecture. This is not a premium segment, so there are only a couple of physical cores inside, but two threads for each — four virtual cores.

    The manufacturing process is quite modern — 14 nm, the operating frequency changes dynamically from 2.7 to 3.5 GHz, manual tuning is not available.

    The letter U in the name refers to reduced heat dissipation, which, according to the specification, does not exceed 15 W. Computing power, as expected, is average, but the cache L3 cache is good — 4 MB. The PassMark test winds up 5163 tokens, which is two times less than the top Intel stones. If you bring it to Watts, it turns out not bad — 344 units.

    Integrated video core — Intel HD Graphics 620, not suitable for heavy games, but quite enough for Photoshop or Premier.

    3Core i5-6200U

    Cost 8 Performance 9 Power consumption 8

    Total rating, calculated as an average of the sum of the main parameters.

    8.3Score

    Pros

    • Multi-threaded cores
    • Low heat dissipation
    • Good compute speed

    Cons

    • Small frequency adjustment limits
    • No manual tuning
    • Average reduced efficiency

    Intel mid-range processor belongs to the sixth release, built on the Skylake reference architecture of recent years. Computations are entrusted to two cores with a pair of virtual threads in each.

    The master oscillator changes the frequency within a small range of 2. 3 — 2.8 GHz, there is no question of any manual tuning.

    The heat output is clamped at 15 W, slightly warm air will come out of the ventilation grille. Intel engineers decided to leave a 3 MB L3 cache, so the overall performance is not bad — 4016 sticks according to PassMark — 3.5 times slower than the flagship. The value reduced to Watts comes out as an average — 268.

    Graphics co-processor — Intel HD Graphics 520, if you play 3D games, then only old ones. MS Office does not slow down, Photoshop works with simple pictures.

    2Core i3-6100U

    Cost 9 Performance 8 Power consumption 7

    Overall rating, calculated as an average of the sum of the main parameters.

    8.0Score

    Pros

    • Average chip price
    • Multithreading budget
    • The crystal almost does not heat up

    Cons

    • The clock frequency is hard beaten
    • Average reduced efficiency
    • Outdated and weak video subsystem

    — there are only two of them, and also in a fixed clock frequency at 2. 3 GHz — Intel deliberately does not use Turbo Boost technology.

    Hyper-threading slightly improves the situation, each core can execute two instruction streams, the processor is quasi-quad-core.

    Circuit — ULV-class with reduced voltage and limited 15 W thermal pack — the hard drive heats up more than the chip. Fortunately, 3 MB L3 cache was left, the crystal threshes numbers 4 times slower than the i9 — 3603 by PassMark or 240 units per watt.

    The usual block of Intel HD Graphics 520 is divorced on the same plate, laptops on the platform with office programs and 3D models cope, but complex games are not for them.

    1Ryzen 3 2200U

    Cost 8 Performance 9Energy consumption 9

    Overall rating, calculated as an average of the sum of the main parameters.

    8.7 Access

    Plus

    • Good calculation speed in segment
    • Parallel calculations in nuclei
    • Good built -in graphic chip

    minus

    • The price of the processor is higher than that of the i5

    2021. It is built on the basis of the modern Zen architecture, lithographed on a 14nm process, contains 2 cores with two parallel calculations.

    The clock generator automatically adjusts the frequency from 2.5 to 3.4 GHz according to the load, user intervention is not allowed.

    AMD places the Ryzen 3 product in the lower end, but it’s slightly better than the i5 in performance. The heat pack is optimized for compact computers — 15 W, there is a solid 4 MB L3 cache in place, so according to PassMark’s calculation, 4459 marks are obtained, which, translated into Watts, gives a good 298 units.

    AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 GPU outperforms Intel counterparts, games run fine at medium settings. Formulas in MatLab are calculated quickly, WinRar quickly packs files.

    The best processors for inexpensive laptops

    With the advent of cheap laptops, desktop computers are no longer needed, but to provide laptops to everyone, prices do not have to be outrageous. Factories and design bureaus are working in this direction, as well as the masters of silicon — Intel together with AMD.

    The idea of ​​netbooks, for which the Atom was invented, was canceled by suddenly appearing tablets, so there is no point in considering this processor. Other economical chips include Celeron, Pentium, lower versions of the Core i3, as well as AMD’s A-series.

    To reduce consumption, the heat packs are clamped down to 6 W — you can cool without a cooler, the number of cores is small, the frequencies are not top-end. Which processors are better to choose for inexpensive laptops — read below.

    4Celeron N4000

    Cost 9 Performance 7 Power consumption 9

    Overall rating, calculated as an average of the sum of the main parameters.

    8.3Rating

    Pros

    • Excellent energy package
    • Cheap processor
    • There is a second level cache

    Cons

    • Low performance
    • Not suitable for serious games

    The budget Celeron chip has Gemini Lake architecture, it has two cores without multithreading. Photolithography is modern — 14 nm.

    The master oscillator is tuned within 1.1 — 2.6 GHz, the frequency cannot be tweaked by hand. To speed up the work, a 4 MB second-level cache is provided.

    Impressive heat dissipation — only 6 W, a laptop with such a cold processor can last up to 10 hours. The performance, of course, is not a record — PassMark assigns 1460 stars, while the conversion to Watts gives 243 units, but the chip is cheap.

    The built-in UHD Graphics 600 co-processor only allows you to play Tetris or the first Heroes. Lightweight laptops and netbooks on the platform are suitable for Internet and travel writing.

    3Pentium N4200

    Cost 8 Performance 8 Power consumption 8

    Overall rating, calculated as an average of the sum of the main parameters.

    8.0Rating

    Pros

    • Good performance
    • Inexpensive processor
    • Auto-tuning

    Cons

    • Small L2 cache
    • 3D games won’t run

    The inexpensive «stump» is based on the Apollo Lake platform with a quartet of cores, each running only one thread. The resolution of the lithography is 14 nm, a small L2 cache of 2 MB is provided for acceleration.

    The rhythm of the system is determined by the variable frequency oscillator 1.2 — 2.5 GHz, no manual multipliers are provided.

    On the other hand, a 6 W thermal package allows you to create quiet subnotes without coolers at all. Still, two pairs of cores make themselves felt — PassMark tests score good 2021 points, and the conversion to Watts is surprising — as many as 336 units, like the i7.

    However, the HD Graphics 505 card will not even allow you to run cool games, and the old ones will run at low settings. The comfort of working on a laptop will depend on the amount of memory and the speed of the drive.

    2Core i3-6006U

    Cost 7 Performance 10 Power consumption 9

    Overall rating, calculated as an average of the sum of the main parameters.

    8.7Evaluation

    Pros

    • Multi-threaded
    • Normal L3 cache
    • Excellent speed

    Cons

    • Fixed oscillator frequency
    • Increased price per die
    • Not for heavy gaming

    For simple laptops, a third category processor built on the basic structure of Skylake. Unlike the Pentium, Intel decided to add multi-threading, so 2 physical cores work like four virtual ones — it has a positive effect on performance. The technical process is worked out, 14 nm.

    Master frequencies are hard-locked to 2.0 GHz, do not change either automatically or manually. It’s good that the L3 cache is left, which is a good 3 MB.

    The thermal power of the i3 is average for ULV processors — 15 W, the air from the ventilation does not burn. Hyper-threading, together with cache memory, provides significant advantages — PassMark estimates performance at 5412 caps, which is only 2.6 times less than the i9 flagship, and the given numbers look nice — 361 units.

    The Intel HD Graphics 520 will not allow you to play complex games. Laptops based on this are designed for MS Office, Chrome and Skype — they do an excellent job with these tasks.

    1A9-9420

    Cost 8 Performance 7 Energy consumption 8

    Total rating, calculated as the average of the sum of the main parameters.

    7.7 Essential

    Plus

    • There is a frequency auto -adjustment
    • A good graphic accompaniment
    • is a small cache L2

    minus

    • not the best performance
    • 0031

    AMD’s unpretentious stone for modest laptops belongs to the seventh generation and has a Stoney Ridge architecture. Calculations inside are occupied by a pair of cores without multithreading. The technological process is slightly outdated — 28 nm.

    The automatic circuit changes the driving pulses within a small range — from 3.0 to 3.6 GHz, manual settings of the coefficients are blocked. To optimize memory management, a small 1 MB L2 cache is provided.

    Heat dissipation is limited to 10 W, this significantly affects performance — 2308 crumbs according to PassMark — 6 times less than the leader, in the given units the average is estimated — 230.

    The Radeon R5 graphics module is on the same plate as the CPU. In general, laptops on this platform are designed to work — Lightroom, Photoshop or Sony Vegas. WoW will run on medium settings.

    Conclusion

    When choosing a laptop, the main parameters are usually known — gaming, portable or budget, the desired screen size and hard drive capacity are clear. But with the main computing unit (CPU), not everything is obvious. Marketers have taught buyers that the conditional Core i7 is cooler than the Core i3, but this is not entirely true.
    Important information is hidden in the letter marking of the processor, which determines the performance and energy consumption, as well as the final cost of the machine. For example, ultra-economical calculators with the letter Y are produced for ultrabooks, with the symbol U for medium laptops. Their performance is lower than that of HQ, core overclocking is prohibited, but the computer will not heat up the air and will last longer on battery power.

    Comparison of the performance of different generations of Intel processors

    Almost every year, a new generation of Intel Xeon E5 CPUs enter the market. In each generation, the socket and technological process alternately change. There are more and more cores, and the heat dissipation is gradually decreasing. But a natural question arises: “What does the new architecture give to the end user?” To do this, I decided to test the performance of similar processors of different generations. I decided to compare models of the mass segment: 8-core processors 2660, 2670, 2640V2, 2650V2, 2630V3 and 2620V4. Testing with such a generational spread is not entirely fair, because between V2 and V3 there is a different chipset, a new-generation memory with a higher frequency, and most importantly, there are no direct peers in frequency among models of all 4 generations. But, in any case, this study will help to understand to what extent the performance of new processors has increased in real applications and synthetic tests. The selected line of processors has many similar parameters: the same number of cores and threads, 20 MB SmartCache, 8 GT/s QPI (except 2640V2) and the number of PCI-E lanes is 40.

    To assess the feasibility of testing all processors, I turned to the PassMark test results.

    Below is a summary graph of the results:

    Since the frequency is significantly different, it is not entirely correct to compare the results. But despite this, conclusions immediately arise:

    1. 2660 is equivalent in performance to 2620V4 2. 2670 outperforms 2620V4 in performance (obviously, due to the frequency) 3. 2640V2 sags, and 2650V2 beats everyone (also because of the frequency)

    I divided the result by the frequency and got some performance value at 1 GHz:

    Here the results are more interesting and clear:

    the fact that its overall performance is very high 2. 2640V2 and 2650V2 — a very strange low result, which is worse than that of 2660 3. 2630V3 and 2620V4 — the only logical increase (apparently just due to the new architecture …)

    After analyzing the result, I decided to weed out some of the uninteresting models that have no value for further testing:

    costs unreasonably more than the 2620V4, given the similar performance and, moreover, this is already the outgoing generation of processors 3. threading is on our list, so we definitely leave 4 for further tests. 2660 and 2670 are excellent results compared to 2620V4. In my opinion, it is the comparison of the first and last (at the moment) generation in the Intel Xeon E5 line that is of particular interest. In addition, we still have sufficient stocks of first-generation processors in stock, so this comparison is very relevant for us.

    The cost of servers based on 2660 and 2620V4 processors can differ by almost 2 times against the latter, so by comparing their performance and choosing a server based on V1 processors, you can significantly reduce the budget for buying a new server. But I will talk about this proposal after the results of testing.

    3 stands were assembled for testing:

    1. 2 x Xeon E5-2660, 8 x 8Gb DDR3 ECC REG 1333, SSD Intel Enterprise 150Gb 2. 2 x Xeon E5-2670, 8 x 8Gb DDR3 ECC REG 1333, SSD Intel Enterprise 150Gb 3. 2 x Xeon E5-2620V4, 8 x 8Gb DDR4 ECC REG 2133, SSD Intel Enterprise 150Gb

    PassMark PerformanceTest 9.

    0

    When selecting processors for tests, I already used the results of synthetic tests, but now it’s interesting to compare these models in more detail. The comparison was made in groups: the 1st generation against the 4th.

    A more detailed test report allows us to draw some conclusions:

    1. Mathematics, incl. and floating point, mainly depends on the frequency. The difference of 100 MHz allowed the 2660 to outperform the 2620V4 in computational operations, in encryption and compression (and this despite a significant difference in memory frequency) 2. Physics and calculations using extended instructions on the new architecture are performed better, despite the low frequency 3. And, of course, the test with the use of memory passed in favor of V4 processors, since in this case different generations of memory competed — DDR4 and DDR3.

    It was synthetic. Let’s see what specialized benchmarks and real applications will show.

    7ZIP archiver

    Here the results are similar to the previous test — direct binding to the processor frequency. It does not matter that a slower memory is installed — V1 processors confidently take the lead in frequency.

    CINEBENCH R15

    CINEBENCH is a computer performance benchmark for MAXON Cinema 4D professional animation software.
    Xeon E5-2670 pulled out in frequency and beat 2620V4. But the E5-2660, which has a less visible advantage in frequency, lost to the 4th generation processor. Hence the conclusion — this software uses useful additions to the new architecture (although it may be all about memory …), but not so much that it was a decisive factor.

    3DS MAX + V-Ray

    To evaluate the performance of processors when rendering in a real application, I took a bunch: 3ds Max 2021 + V-ray 3.4 + a real scene with several light sources, specular and transparent materials, and an environment map.
    The results were similar to CINEBENCH: the Xeon E5-2670 had the lowest render time, while the 2660 couldn’t beat the 2620V4.

    1C: SQL/File

    At the end of the test, I enclose the results of the gilev tests for 1C.
    When testing a database with file access, the E5-2620V4 processor confidently leads. The table shows the average values ​​of 20 runs of the same test. The difference between the results of each stand in the case of the file base was no more than 2%.

    A single-threaded SQL database test showed very strange results. The difference turned out to be negligible, given the different frequencies for 2660 and 2670, and the different frequencies for DDR3 and DDR4. There was an attempt to optimize the SQL settings, but the results turned out to be worse than it was, so I decided to test all the stands on the basic settings.

    The results of the multi-threaded SQL test turned out to be even more strange and inconsistent. The maximum speed of 1 thread in MB/s was equivalent to the performance index in the previous single-threaded test.

    The next parameter was the maximum speed (of all streams) — the result was almost identical for all stands. Since the results of different runs fluctuated greatly (+ -5%) — sometimes they were at different stands with a significant margin both in one direction and in the other. The same average multi-threaded SQL test results lead me to 3 thoughts:

    1. This situation is caused by a non-optimized SQL configuration 2. The SSD became a system bottleneck and did not allow processors to overclock 3. There is almost no difference between the memory and processor frequencies for these tasks (which is extremely unlikely)

    If you have reliable explanations for such results — I ask you to share them in the comments.

    Also, the result for the “Recommended number of users” parameter turned out to be inexplicable. The average result of the 2660 turned out to be the highest of all — and this is despite the low results of all tests. I will also be glad to see your comments on this issue.

    Conclusions

    The results of several comprehensive computational tests showed that the processor frequency in most cases turned out to be more important than the generation, architecture, and even memory frequency. Of course, there is modern software that uses all the improvements of the new architecture. For example, video transcoding is sometimes performed incl. using AVX2.0 instructions, but this is specialized software — and most server applications are still tied to the number and frequency of cores.
    Of course, I’m not saying that there is absolutely no difference between processors, I just want to note that for certain applications there is no point in a «planned» transition to a new generation.

    If you do not agree with me or you have suggestions for testing, the stands have not yet been sorted out, and I will be happy to test your tasks.

    Economic benefits

    As I wrote at the beginning of the article, we offer a line of servers based on the first generation Xeon E5 processors, which are significantly more expensive than servers based on the E5-2620V4. These are the same new servers (not to be confused with used ones) with a 3-year warranty.
    Below I give the estimated calculation:

    STSS Flagman RX227.4-008LH

    In configuration
    2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620v4
    + 8 x 8GB DDR4 ECC Region is for today
    6 966 900 9,1466,
    6,
    6,
    6,
    6,
    6,
    6,
    6,
    ,
    6, 9,146, 9,146,
    6,
    6,
    6,
    Similar configuration STSS Flagman EX227.