AMD E1-6010 with Radeon R2 Integrated Graphics [Review] – Laptop Processors
The AMD E1-6010 is a very basic processor for inexpensive laptops. Featuring two cores, a clock speed of only 1.35GHz, and 1MB of cache, the E1-6010 “Beema” APU can’t offer anything but entry-level performance. In fact, it is one of the slowest notebook-use CPUs on the market today, as you can see in the PassMark benchmark comparison chart.
However, it can be used for the daily chores and provides an acceptable experience if you don’t do anything too complex on it and don’t multitask too much. Just like the competing Intel Celeron N2820/N2830/N2840 series CPUs we reviewed recently.
In the video below, you can see what doing everyday light tasks on a laptop with the E1-6010 looks like. It’s a Dell Inspiron 3541 series configuration with 4GB of RAM and a mechanical hard drive. Scrolling through web pages is quite smooth, as well as switching between a couple of opened apps – YouTube video in Internet explorer, a text document in WordPad, and a 5MP image in Paint. net. YouTube 1080p-resolution videos play without a glitch. The aforementioned Intel Celerons provide a bit snappier experience, but overall the E1-6010 has a real life performance very close to them.
As for gaming, the Radeon R2 is also similar to the Intel HD integrated graphics used in the Celeron chips. This means playable frame rates only in less demanding games on lower graphics settings and low 720p resolution. Under these conditions, our test showed playable are League of Legends, Counter Strike: Global Offensive, and Team Fortress 2, all running at about 25 fps.
However, in some titles the E1-6010 / Radeon R2 performed unexpectedly bad. Among the tested games, in Dota 2 and Minecraft in particular. Due to some reason, the frame rates on the lowest settings and 720p resolution were around 10fps in Dota 2 and around 15 fps in Minecraft most of the time. It appears the CPU clock speed of 1.35GHz throttles the system in these games. On the other hand, Minecraft and Dota 2 are playable on the Celeron CPUs at above 20 fps.
Performance of the E1-6010 is sacrificed big time in interest of lower costs, better power efficiency, and lower heat. The processor consumes 10 Watts, which is below consumption of the popular Intel Core series chips with 15W or greater TDP, but still above the Celeron N-series with 7.5W TDP. The E1 runs quite cool. In the tested notebook, the CPU temperatures were between 40 degrees Celsius on idle and up to 60 degrees under heavy stress. The laptop itself stayed almost cold most of the time with fans blowing only occasionally on low and quiet rotating speeds.
All in all, the E1-6010 review shows us that even the cheapest notebooks with slowest CPUs on the current market are usable machines, which perform the daily web, office, and multimedia tasks at acceptable speeds and even run some lighter games.
Laptops with the AMD E1-6010.
Update: The E1-6015 is an updated version of the same chip. The only difference between the 6010 and 6015 are their clock speeds of 1.35 and 1.4 MHz, respectively, without any noticeable impact on performance.
Note: The benchmark scores of the listed processors are averages measured across various devices with these processors. The scores and real-world performance of the AMD E1-6010 and compared CPUs may vary depending on the notebooks’ other components, settings, cooling, and other factors. However, the benchmark results are good indicators of the processors’ performance.
Below you can read and submit user reviews, questions, and answers about the processor. Thank you for your contribution.
Current rating: 3.73 out of 5 stars
×
Email address *
Please CLICK HERE to provide e-mail for receiving notifications when there are new replies
(The e-mail won’t be used for any other purposes.)
Leave a Review
Ask a Question
Leave a Review
Please select stars to rate this itemPerfect Good Average Mediocre Poor
Title (optional)
Attach a photo or videoPhoto Video
Enter a URL (optional)
Choose a file
Name *
Email *
Ask a Question
Attach a photo or videoPhoto Video
Enter a URL (optional)
Choose a file
Name *
Email *
AMD E1-1200 review | 64 facts and highlights
25points
AMD E1-1200
AMD E1-1200
Why is AMD E1-1200 better than the average?
- GPU clock speed?
500MHzvs419. 31MHz - Thermal Design Power (TDP)?
18Wvs48.12W - L2 core?
0.5MB/corevs0.44MB/core
Which are the most popular comparisons?
AMD E1-1200
vs
Intel Core i3-3220
AMD E1-1200
vs
Intel Core i3-2350M
AMD E1-1200
vs
Intel Core i3-2100
AMD E1-1200
vs
Intel Core i3-3225
AMD E1-1200
vs
Intel Core i5-4288U
AMD E1-1200
vs
Intel Atom D2550
AMD E1-1200
vs
Intel Core i3-2375M
AMD E1-1200
vs
Intel Core i5-3230M
AMD E1-1200
vs
AMD E1-2100
AMD E1-1200
vs
AMD E2-1800
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
AMD E1-1200
1 User reviews
AMD E1-1200
9.0/10
1 User reviews
Features
Value for money
10.0/10
1 votes
Gaming
9.0/10
1 votes
Performance
8. 0/10
1 votes
Reliability
10.0/10
1 votes
Energy efficiency
9.0/10
1 votes
Performance
1.CPU speed
2 x 1.4GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
2.CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
3.turbo clock speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
4.Has an unlocked multiplier
✖AMD E1-1200
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
5.L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
6.L3 cache
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
7.L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
8.L2 core
0.5MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
9.L3 core
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Memory
1.RAM speed
1066MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.DDR memory version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
4.memory channels
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
5.maximum memory amount
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
6.bus transfer rate
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7.Supports ECC memory
✖AMD E1-1200
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
9.bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Benchmarks
1.PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
2.PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 (single) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7.Blender (bmw27) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
8.Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
9.performance per watt
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✖AMD E1-1200
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
2.Has AES
✖AMD E1-1200
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3.Has AVX
✖AMD E1-1200
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
4.SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✖AMD E1-1200
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
6.bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
7.Has MMX
✔AMD E1-1200
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖AMD E1-1200
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
9.front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best CPUs?
E1-1200 [in 11 benchmarks]
AMD
E1-1200
Buy
- Interface
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory
- Memory type
- Memory clock speed
- Maximum resolution
Summary
AMD started AMD E1-1200 sales 20 March 2012. This is Zacate architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at home systems. It has 2 cores and 2 threads, and is based on 40 nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 1400 MHz and a locked multiplier.
Compatibility-wise, this is FT1 BGA 413-Ball processor with a TDP of 18 Watt and a maximum temperature of 100 °C. It supports DDR3 memory.
We have no data on E1-1200 benchmark results.
General info
E1-1200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.
Place in performance rating | not rated | |
Market segment | Laptop | |
Series | AMD E-Series | |
Architecture codename | Zacate (2011−2013) | |
Release date | 20 March 2012 (10 years ago) | |
Current price | $99 | of 14999 (Xeon Platinum 9282) |
Technical specs
Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | |
Threads | 2 | |
Boost clock speed | 1.4 GHz | of 5.8 (Core i9-13900K) |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | of 1536 (EPYC Embedded 3401) |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | of 12288 (Core 2 Quad Q9550) |
L3 cache | 0 KB | of 32768 (Ryzen Threadripper 1998) |
Chip lithography | 40 nm | of 5 (Apple M1) |
Die size | 75 mm2 | |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 100 °C | of 105 (Core i7-5950HQ) |
64 bit support | + | |
Windows 11 compatibility | — |
Compatibility
Information on E1-1200 compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | of 8 (Opteron 842) |
Socket | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | |
Thermal design power (TDP) | 18 Watt | of 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282) |
Technologies and extensions
Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by E1-1200. You’ll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V | |
PowerNow | + |
Virtualization technologies
Supported virtual machine optimization technologies. Some are specific to Intel only, some to AMD.
AMD-V | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by E1-1200’s memory controller. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | of 5200 (Ryzen 5 7600X) |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of GPU integrated into E1-1200.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 7310 |
Benchmark performance
Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of E1-1200. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
- Passmark
- GeekBench 5 Single-Core
- GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
- Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
- Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
- 3DMark06 CPU
- Cinebench 11. 5 64-bit multi-core
- Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
- WinRAR 4.0
- Geekbench 2
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
E1-1200
374
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
E1-1200
117
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
E1-1200
214
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
E1-1200
912
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
E1-1200
1682
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
E1-1200
874
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
E1-1200
1
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
E1-1200
0.3
WinRAR 4.0
WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using ‘Best’ setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
E1-1200
418
Geekbench 2
Benchmark coverage: 5%
E1-1200
1440
Similar processors
Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
Recommended graphics cards
These graphics cards are most commonly used with E1-1200 according to our statistics.
Radeon HD
7310
69.5%
Radeon
Graphics
2.9%
HD
Graphics 4000
1.5%
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
1. 5%
UHD
Graphics 630
1.2%
Radeon HD
8210
1%
Radeon RX
Vega 7
0.8%
Radeon HD
6310
0.7%
Radeon HD
7730
0.7%
Radeon HD
7400G
0.7%
User rating
Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about E1-1200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
AMD E1-1200 Specs, Price, and FPS in Games
2 | 2 | 1.4 GHz |
Cores | Threads | Base Frequency |
---|
Geekbench 5 Single-Core
118
2%
Geekbench 5 Multi-Core
220
0%
Availability
No items available
Graphics Card
Resolution
Select game resolution
Graphics Settings
Select game graphics
Offset
…
Apply Offset
Value Rating
Performance Rating
Value per FPS
You will receive
… FPS
Alternatives for E1-1200
1080p, High
No alternatives — this is the best option
Specifications
General | |
---|---|
Release Date | Jun 6th, 2012 |
Segment | Desktop |
Socket | AMD Socket FT1 |
Collection | E1 |
Codename | Zacate |
Performance | |
---|---|
Cores | 2 |
Threads | 2 |
Base Frequency | 1. 4 GHz |
Other | |
---|---|
Power Consumption | 18 W |
Overclockable | No |
Integrated Graphics | Radeon HD 7310 |
Builds Using AMD E1-1200
1080p, High
Find out which of the 2 CPUs performs better, view a side-by-side specification comparison.
Ryzen 5 5600X
$193.99
Ryzen 7 5800X
$269.99
Ryzen 7 5800X
$269.99
Ryzen 5 3600
$138.44
Ryzen 7 5800X
$269.99
Ryzen 9 5900X
Core i9-12900K
$582.66
Core i9-9900K
Ryzen 5 5600X
$193.99
Ryzen 5 5600G
$134.21
Ryzen 7 5800X
$269.99
Ryzen 5 3600X
Refine results to filter 1558 processors by performance, release date, price, and value. Click on a CPU to view more in-depth specifications and game FPS.
Found 1558 CPUs.
Popularity
Processor
Performance
Ryzen 5 5600X
Release Date: Nov 5th, 2020
Performance Rating
$193. 99 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i9-9900
Release Date: Apr 23rd, 2019
Performance Rating
$715.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 7 5800X
Release Date: Nov 5th, 2020
Performance Rating
$269.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i7-12700K
Release Date: Nov 4th, 2021
Performance Rating
$401.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i5-9600K
Release Date: Oct 19th, 2018
Performance Rating
$235 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 9 5900X
Release Date: Nov 5th, 2020
Performance Rating
$399 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i9-10900K
Release Date: Apr 30th, 2020
Performance Rating
$340 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i9-12900K
Release Date: Nov 4th, 2021
Performance Rating
$582.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 5 3600
Release Date: Jul 7th, 2019
Performance Rating
$138. 44 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 7 5700U
Release Date: Unknown
Performance Rating
Core i5-11260H
Release Date: May 11th, 2021
Performance Rating
Core i7-6700K
Release Date: Aug 1st, 2015
Performance Rating
$239.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 9 3900X
Release Date: Jul 7th, 2019
Performance Rating
$350 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i5-12600K
Release Date: Nov 4th, 2021
Performance Rating
$277.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 5 3600X
Release Date: Jul 7th, 2019
Performance Rating
$245 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 5 5600G
Release Date: Apr 13th, 2021
Performance Rating
$134.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i5-11400F
Release Date: Mar 16th, 2021
Performance Rating
$179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 9 5950X
Release Date: Nov 5th, 2020
Performance Rating
$548. 99 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i7-4790K
Release Date: May 1st, 2014
Performance Rating
$312.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 7 4800H
Release Date: Jan 6th, 2020
Performance Rating
Core i7-8700K
Release Date: Oct 5th, 2017
Performance Rating
$330 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i5-11400H
Release Date: May 11th, 2021
Performance Rating
Core i5-10400F
Release Date: Apr 30th, 2020
Performance Rating
$107 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i7-11800H
Release Date: May 11th, 2021
Performance Rating
Core i7-11700K
Release Date: Mar 16th, 2021
Performance Rating
$272.43 on Amazon
In Stock
- Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- …
- 61
- 62
- 63
- Next
AMD E1-6015 processor review: CPU specs, performance benchmarks
Buy on Amazon
E1-6015 processor released by AMD; release date: Q2’15. The processor is designed for mobile-computers and based on Beema microarchitecture.
CPU is locked to prevent overclocking. Total number of cores — 2, threads — 2. Manufacturing process technology — 28 nm. Cache size: L1 — 128 KB, L2 — 1024 KB.
Supported memory types: DDR3L.
Supported socket types: BGA769 (FT3b).
The processor has integrated graphics Radeon R2 series.
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 Car Chase Offscreen |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 Car Chase Offscreen |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 Manhattan |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 Manhattan |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4. 0 T-Rex |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 T-Rex |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Face Detection |
|
|
Name | Value |
---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen | 393 Frames |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen | 393.000 Fps |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan | 985 Frames |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan | 985.000 Fps |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex | 2454 Frames |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex | 2454.000 Fps |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection | 2.146 mPixels/s |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 179.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 5.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 930 million |
Games performance
1. Counter-Strike: GO (2012)
2. Team Fortress 2 (2017)
3. Rocket League (2017)
4. Prey (2017)
5. Farming Simulator 17 (2016)
6. Civilization VI (2016)
7. Overwatch (2016)
8. Rainbow Six Siege (2015)
9. World of Warships (2015)
10. Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
11. Dirt Rally (2015)
12. Dragon Age: Inquisition (2014)
13. Alien: Isolation (2014)
14. Sims 4 (2014)
15. BioShock Infinite (2013)
16. Tomb Raider (2013)
17. Diablo III (2012)
18. The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)
19. Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011)
20. StarCraft 2 (2010)
21. World of Warcraft (2005)
Counter-Strike: GO (2012)
Low, 1024×768 | 26.90 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 21.70 |
High, 1366×768 | 20.00 |
Team Fortress 2 (2017)
Low, 1280×720 | 19.70 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 18.50 |
Rocket League (2017)
Low, 1280×720 | 30.80 |
Prey (2017)
Low, 1280×720 | 9.40 |
Farming Simulator 17 (2016)
Low, 1280×720 | 43.50 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 26. 40 |
Civilization VI (2016)
Low, 1024×768 | 21.60 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 8.50 |
Overwatch (2016)
Low, 1280×720 | 17.50 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 15.00 |
Rainbow Six Siege (2015)
Low, 1024×768 | 20.40 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 13.80 |
World of Warships (2015)
Low, 1366×768 | 25.50 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 20.30 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
Low, 1280×720 | 28.70 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 18.40 |
Dirt Rally (2015)
Low, 1024×768 | 25.10 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 13.00 |
Dragon Age: Inquisition (2014)
Low, 1024×768 | 11. 20 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 8.70 |
Alien: Isolation (2014)
Low, 1024×768 | 17.80 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 10.30 |
Sims 4 (2014)
Low, 1024×768 | 82.10 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 20.70 |
BioShock Infinite (2013)
Low, 1280×720 | 34.45 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 17.25 |
High, 1366×768 | 14.00 |
Tomb Raider (2013)
Low, 1024×768 | 35.70 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 15.70 |
High, 1366×768 | 11.10 |
Diablo III (2012)
Low, 1024×768 | 28.50 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 17.80 |
High, 1366×768 | 15.90 |
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)
Low, 1280×720 | 24. 70 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 16.30 |
High, 1366×768 | 10.80 |
Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011)
Low, 1024×768 | 41.00 |
High, 1366×768 | 20.30 |
StarCraft 2 (2010)
Low, 1024×768 | 59.60 |
Medium, 1360×768 | 17.80 |
High, 1360×768 | 14.10 |
World of Warcraft (2005)
Low, 800×600 | 65.20 |
Medium, 1024×768 | 33.20 |
Specifications (specs)
Architecture codename | Beema |
Family | AMD E1-Series for Notebooks |
Launch date | Q2’15 |
Place in performance rating | 1773 |
Processor Number | E1-6015 |
Vertical segment | Mobile |
64 bit support | |
Base frequency | 1400 MHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 1024 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm |
Number of cores | 2 |
Number of threads | 2 |
|
|
Max memory channels | 1 |
Supported memory types | DDR3L |
Processor graphics | Radeon R2 series |
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | |
Sockets supported | BGA769 (FT3b) |
PCI Express revision | 2. 0 |
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | |
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | |
Intel® AES New Instructions | |
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |
AMD E1-2500 processor review: CPU specs, performance benchmarks
Buy on Amazon
E1-2500 processor released by AMD; release date: 23 May 2013. The processor is designed for laptop-computers and based on Kabini microarchitecture.
CPU is unlocked for overclocking. Total number of cores — 2, threads — 2. Manufacturing process technology — 28 nm. Cache size: L2 — 1 MB.
Supported memory types: Not Listed.
Supported socket types: FT3. Maximum number of processors in a configuration — 1. Power consumption (TDP): 15 Watt.
The processor has integrated graphics AMD Radeon HD 8240.
Benchmarks
PassMark Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop Face Detection |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Ocean Surface Simulation |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop T-Rex |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Video Composition |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Bitcoin Mining |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 Car Chase Offscreen |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 Manhattan |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4. 0 T-Rex |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 Car Chase Offscreen |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 Manhattan |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 T-Rex |
|
|
Name | Value |
---|---|
PassMark — Single thread mark | 461 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 595 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 149 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 261 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection | 2.416 mPixels/s |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation | 62.654 Frames/s |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex | 0.225 Frames/s |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition | 5.067 Frames/s |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining | 12.810 mHash/s |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen | 390 Frames |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan | 889 Frames |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex | 2470 Frames |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen | 390.000 Fps |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan | 889.000 Fps |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex | 2470.000 Fps |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 128 |
Games performance
1. Counter-Strike: GO (2012)
2. Company of Heroes 2 (2013)
3. Metro: Last Light (2013)
4. BioShock Infinite (2013)
5. StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013)
6. Tomb Raider (2013)
7. Hitman: Absolution (2012)
8. Diablo III (2012)
9. The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)
10. Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011)
11. Trackmania Nations Forever (2008)
12. World of Warcraft (2005)
Counter-Strike: GO (2012)
Low, 1024×768 | 21.10 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 19.20 |
Company of Heroes 2 (2013)
Low, 1024×768 | 5.00 |
Metro: Last Light (2013)
Low, 1024×768 | 6.40 |
BioShock Infinite (2013)
Low, 1280×720 | 19. 90 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 9.60 |
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013)
Low, 1024×768 | 46.00 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 18.50 |
Tomb Raider (2013)
Low, 1024×768 | 21.80 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 11.00 |
Hitman: Absolution (2012)
Low, 1024×768 | 7.40 |
Diablo III (2012)
Low, 1024×768 | 28.00 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 18.60 |
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)
Low, 1280×720 | 14.80 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 11.10 |
Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011)
Low, 1024×768 | 28.70 |
High, 1366×768 | 13.30 |
Trackmania Nations Forever (2008)
Low, 640×480 | 59. 80 |
High, 1024×768 | 18.50 |
World of Warcraft (2005)
Low, 800×600 | 46.70 |
Medium, 1024×768 | 33.70 |
Specifications (specs)
Architecture codename | Kabini |
Family | AMD E-Series Processors |
Launch date | 23 May 2013 |
OPN Tray | EM2500BJ23HM |
Place in performance rating | 2115 |
Series | AMD E1-Series APU for Laptops |
Vertical segment | Laptop |
64 bit support | |
Base frequency | 1. 4 GHz |
Die size | 246 mm |
L2 cache | 1 MB |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 90 °C |
Number of cores | 2 |
Number of threads | 2 |
Transistor count | 1178 million |
Unlocked | |
|
|
Max memory channels | 1 |
Supported memory types | Not Listed |
Enduro | |
Processor graphics | AMD Radeon HD 8240 |
Switchable graphics | |
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | |
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | |
DisplayPort | |
HDMI | |
DirectX | 12 |
Vulkan | |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 |
Sockets supported | FT3 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt |
PCI Express revision | 2. 0 |
AMD App Acceleration | |
AMD Elite Experiences | |
AMD HD3D technology | |
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | |
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | |
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | |
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | |
Intel® AES New Instructions | |
PowerGating | |
PowerNow | |
VirusProtect | |
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | |
IOMMU 2. 0 |
Processor E1-2100 [in 18 benchmarks]
AMD
E1-2100
- Interface
- Core frequency
- Video memory size
- Memory type
- Memory frequency
- Maximum resolution
Description
AMD started AMD E1-2100 sales 23 May 2013. This is Kabini architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at home systems. It has 2 cores and 2 threads and is manufactured using 28nm process technology, the maximum frequency is 1000MHz, the multiplier is locked.
In terms of compatibility, this is an FT3 socket processor with a TDP of 9W and a maximum temperature of 90°C. It supports DDR3 memory.
We don’t have test results for the E1-2100.
General
Information about the type (for desktops or laptops) and architecture of the E1-2100, as well as the time when sales began and the cost at that time.
Place in the performance rating | does not participate 172$ | of 14999 (Xeon Platinum 9282) |
Features
E1-2100 quantitative parameters: number of cores and threads, clock speeds, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock status. They indirectly speak about the performance of the processor, but for an accurate assessment, you need to consider the results of the tests.
Core | 2 |
Expanded instructions | 86x SSE (1, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), 64, AES, DDR3L-1333 | Aes-Ni | + | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FMA | FMA4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AVX | + | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PowerTune | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TrueAudio | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PowerNow | + | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PowerGating | + | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Out-of-band | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
VirusProtect | + |
AMD-V | + | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IMMU 2.0 | + |
DisplayPort | + | |||||
HDMI | + |
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | |
Vulkan0041 |
Peripherals
E1-2100 supported peripherals and how to connect them.
Aviation PCI Express | 2.0 | of 5 (Core i9-12900K) |
Tests in the benchmarks
These are the results of the E1-2100 performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The total score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest processor at the moment.
- Passmark
- GeekBench 5 Single-Core
- GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
- Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
- Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
- 3DMark06 CPU
- Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
- Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
- Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
- Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
- TrueCrypt AES
- WinRAR 4.0
- x264 encoding pass 2
- x264 encoding pass 1
- Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core
- Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core
- Geekbench 2
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widely used benchmark that consists of 8 different tests, including integer and floating point calculations, extended instruction tests, compression, encryption, and game physics calculations. Also includes a separate single-threaded test.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
E1-2100
406
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance. This version uses only one processor core.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
E1-2100
108
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance. This version uses all available processor cores.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
E1-2100
191
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is a very outdated ray tracing benchmark for processors developed by the authors of Cinema 4D — Maxon. The Single-Core version uses a single CPU thread to render a futuristic motorcycle model.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
E1-2100
765
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 that uses all processor threads. The possible number of threads in this version is limited to 16.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
E1-2100
1435
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is an outdated set of benchmarks based on DirectX 9 by Futuremark. Its processor part contains two tests, one of which calculates the pathfinding of game AI, the other emulates game physics using the PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
E1-2100
772
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 that uses all processor threads. This version supports a maximum of 64 threads.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
E1-2100
0
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core (sometimes referred to as Multi-Thread) is a variant of Cinebench R15 that uses all of the processor threads.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
E1-2100
36
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (Release 15) is a benchmark created by Maxon, the creator of the popular Cinema 4D 3D modeling package. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench using more modern variants of the Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes referred to as Single-Thread) uses only one CPU thread to render a room full of mirror balls and complexly shaped lights.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
E1-2100
20
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark developed by Maxon. authors of Cinema 4D. It has been superseded by later versions of Cinebench which use more modern variants of the Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads one CPU thread with ray tracing, rendering a glossy room full of crystal spheres and lights.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
E1-2100
0. 2
TrueCrypt AES
TrueCrypt is a deprecated program that was widely used to encrypt disk partitions on the fly. It contains several built-in benchmarks, one of which is TrueCrypt AES. It measures the speed of data encryption using the AES algorithm. The result of the test is the encryption speed in gigabytes per second.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
E1-2100
0
WinRAR 4.0
WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of the popular archiver. It contains an internal speed test using maximum compression by the RAR algorithm on large amounts of randomly generated data. Results are measured in kilobytes per second.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
E1-2100
492
x264 encoding pass 2
x264 Pass 2 is a slower MPEG4 x264 video compression benchmark, resulting in a variable bit rate output file. This results in a better quality of the resulting video file, as a higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. The benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
E1-2100
3
x264 encoding pass 1
The x264 benchmark uses the MPEG 4 x264 compression method to encode the sample video in HD (720p). Pass 1 is a faster option that produces an output file at a constant bit rate. Its result is measured in frames per second, that is, how many frames of the source video file were encoded in one second on average.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
E1-2100
15
Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core
Benchmark coverage: 6%
E1-2100
1016
Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core
Benchmark coverage: 6%
E1-2100
595
Geekbench 2
Benchmark coverage: 5%
E1-2100
1443
Other processors
Here we recommend several processors that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one.
Recommended video cards
According to our statistics, these video cards are most often used with E1-2100:
Radeon HD
8210
70.8%
Radeon
Graphics
3.7%
Radeon HD
7310
1.4%
Radeon HD
8570M
1.3%
Radeon HD
8210E
1.1%
Radeon HD
8180
1%
HD
Graphics 4000
1%
Radeon R5
M230
1%
UHD
Graphics 630
1%
UHD
Graphics
0. 8%
User rating
Here you can see the evaluation of the processor by users, as well as put your own rating.
Tips and comments
Here you can ask a question about the E1-2100 processor, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
AMD E1-2100 APU specifications, price, test, competitors
- Main page
- >
- processors
- >
- AMD
- >
- E1-2100 APU
processor E1-2100 APU
Number Number-2.
Basic frequency of nuclei E1-2100 APU-1 GGC. The maximum frequency in AMD Turbo Core mode reaches 1 GHz.
Price in Russia
Want to buy cheap E1-2100 APU? Look at the list of stores that already sell the processor in your city.
Family
- E1-1200 APU
- E1-2500 APU
Benchmarks AMD E1-2100 APU
Gaming speed
Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.
The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Speed in office use
Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office programs.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores.
The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Speed of numerical operations
Simple household tasks |
||
Minimum | Average | Maximum |
9 | Memory: 33 | 50 9003 |
Memory 35.3 |
||
7 | 1 core: 15 | 17 |
1 core 7. 1 |
||
12 | 2 cores: 26 | 34 |
2 cores 6.4 |
||
Demanding games and tasks |
||
Minimum | Average | Maximum |
14 | 4 cores: 27 | 34 9003 |
4 cores 3.4 |
||
16 | 8 cores: 28 | 35 |
8 cores 1. 8 |
Extreme |
||
Minimum | Average | Maximum |
14 | All Cores: 28 | 34 9003 |
All cores 0.5 |
Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
When choosing a processor to work with, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Benchmarks
Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.
Passmark
Intel Celeron N2820
440
AMD ATHLON LE-1640
430
Intel Atom D525
423
AMD E-450 APU
000 9000 9000 APU0868 AMD E-350
413
AMD E1-2100 APU
409
Intel ATOM N2800
Intel ATOM D510 9000 385
Intel
9000 3000 AMEL 9000. AMEN
383
Intel Atom Z2760
375
Game Tests
FPS measured by us in popular games on AMD E1-2100 APU and system requirements met. Please note that the official requirements of developers in games do not always match the data of real tests. Also, the result is strongly influenced by the overclocking of the system and the graphic settings in the game. We test at high settings in FullHD resolution to get numbers close to real gameplay.
RAM
- No data
SSD
- A400 240GB
- A400 120GB
- 850 EVO
We collected a list -2100 APUs. Also with these components, the best results in tests and stable operation are achieved.
Most popular config: motherboard for AMD E1-2100 APU — HP 15 Notebook PC, graphics card — Quadro NVS 295, SSD — A400 240GB.
Characteristics
The data is not yet filled in, so the tables may lack information or existing functions may be omitted.
Basic
Manufacturer | AMD |
Release dateMonth and year of the processor’s availability. | 10-2016 |
Cores The number of physical cores. | 2 |
ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. | 2 |
Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores in the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. | Missing |
Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. | Yes GHz |
Turbo frequencyThe maximum frequency of one processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU. | Yes GHz |
Embedded Options Available Two enclosure versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. | No |
Video core
RAM
PCI
Data protection
Design
Competitors
Please note that competitors are selected automatically based on performance in a particular task. Therefore, some may puzzle you. We are improving our selection algorithm, treat with understanding.
Compare
AMD E1-2100 APU vs Intel Atom 230
AMD E1-2100 APU vs Intel Atom D510
AMD E1-2100 APU vs Intel Atom N270
AMD E1-2100 APU vs Intel Atom Z520
AMD E1-2100 APU vs Intel Atom 230
AMD E1-2100 APU vs Intel Atom 230
characteristics AMD E1-1200 APU, price, competitors,
- Home
- >
- Processors
- >
- AMD
- E1-1200 APU
9000>
Processor E1-1200 APU APU APU APU APU APU cores — 2.
The base frequency of the E1-1200 APU cores is 1.4 GHz. The maximum frequency in AMD Turbo Core mode reaches 1.4 GHz.
Price in Russia
Want to buy cheap E1-1200 APU? Look at the list of stores that already sell the processor in your city.
Family
- E1-2100 APU
- E1-2500 APU
AMD E1-1200 APU Benchmarks
Game Speed
Performance in games and similar applications.
The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Speed in office use
Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office applications.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores.
The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Speed of numerical operations
Simple household tasks |
||
Minimum | Average | Maximum |
18 | Memory: 45 | 74 9003 |
Memory 47 |
||
8 | 1 core: 18 | 21 |
1 core 8.5 |
||
14 | 2 cores: 32 | 42 |
2 cores 7.8 |
||
Demanding games and tasks |
||
Minimum | Average | Maximum |
16 | 4 cores: 33 | 42 9003 |
4 cores 4. 2 |
||
18 | 8 cores: 34 | 42 |
8 cores 2.2 |
Extreme |
||
Minimum | Average | Maximum |
15 | All cores: 34 | 42 9003 |
All cores 0.6 |
Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
When choosing a processor to work with, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Benchmarks
Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.
Passmark
AMD E-350
413
AMD E1-2100 APU
409
Intel Atom N2800
408
Intel Atom D510
385 9000 385 9000 385 9000 385 9000 385 9000 385 9000 38500
384
AMD E1-1200 APU
383
AMD Athlon 64 3400+
375
Intel Atom Z2760
375
AMD V140
372
Intel Atom 330
371
AMD Athlon 64 3500+
366
Game Tests
FPS measured by us in popular games on AMD E1-1200 APU and system requirements. Please note that the official requirements of developers in games do not always match the data of real tests. Also, the result is strongly influenced by the overclocking of the system and the graphic settings in the game. We test at high settings in FullHD resolution to get numbers close to real gameplay.
RAM
- No data
SSD
9000
0 most often chosen when building a computer based on the E1-1200 APU. Also with these components, the best results in tests and stable operation are achieved.
The most popular config: motherboard for AMD E1-1200 APU — HP Compaq CQ58 Notebook PC, video card — GeForce GT 220M, SSD — A400 120GB.
Characteristics
The data is not yet filled in, so the tables may lack information or existing functions may be omitted.
Basic
Manufacturer | AMD |
Release dateMonth and year of the processor’s availability. | 10-2016 |
Cores The number of physical cores. | 2 |
ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. | 2 |
Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores in the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. | Missing |
Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. | 1.4 GHz |
Turbo frequencyThe maximum frequency of one processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU. | 1.4 GHz |
Embedded Options Available Two enclosure versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. | No |
Video core
RAM
PCI
Data protection
Design
Competitors
Please note that competitors are selected automatically based on performance in a particular task. Therefore, some may puzzle you. We are improving our selection algorithm, treat with understanding.
Compare
AMD E1-1200 APU vs Intel Pentium 4 2. 93GHz
AMD E1-1200 APU vs Intel Celeron N3010
AMD E1-1200 APU vs Intel Celeron 723
AMD E1-1200 APU vs Intel Pentium M processor 1.60GHz
AMD E1-1200 APU vs Intel Pentium M processor 1.60GHz
AMD E1-1200 APU vs Intel Celeron M 430
AMD E1-2100 processor review: features, benchmark tests
The E1-2100 processor was released by AMD, release date: 23 May 2013. The processor is designed for laptop computers and is built on the Kabini architecture.
Processor unlocked for overclocking. Total number of cores — 2, threads — 2. Technological process — 28 nm. Cache size: L2 — 1 MB.
Supported memory type: Not Listed.
Supported socket type: FT3. The maximum number of processors in the configuration is 1. Power consumption (TDP): 9Watt.
AMD Radeon HD 8210 graphics integrated into the processor.
Top1 CPU |
This CPU |
CPU mark
Top1 CPU |
This CPU |
118142 |
Single Core
Top1 CPU |
This CPU |
Multi-Core
Top1 CPU |
This CPU |
Face Detection
Top1 CPU |
This CPU |
56.680 mPixels/s |
0.547 mPixels/s |
Ocean Surface Simulation
Top1 CPU |
This CPU |
741.453 Frames/s |
1.584 Frames/s |
T-Rex
Top1 CPU |
This CPU |
3. 237 Frames/s |
0.040 Frames/s |
Video Composition
Top1 CPU |
This CPU |
49.002 Frames/s |
3.862 Frames/s |
Bitcoin Mining
Top1 CPU |
This CPU |
218.231 mHash/s |
9. 251 mHash/s |
Car Chase Offscreen
Top1 CPU |
This CPU |
9047 Frames |
311 Frames |
Manhattan
Top1 CPU |
This CPU |
7128 Frames |
1098 Frames |
T-Rex
Top1 CPU |
This CPU |
12887 Frames |
1840 Frames |
Car Chase Offscreen
Top1 CPU |
This CPU |
9047.000 Fps |
311.000 Fps |
Manhattan
Top1 CPU |
This CPU |
7128. 000 Fps |
1098.000 Fps |
T-Rex
Top1 CPU |
This CPU |
12887.000 Fps |
1840.000 Fps |
Name | Meaning |
---|---|
PassMark — Single thread mark | 326 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 406 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 109 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 183 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection | 0.547 mPixels/s |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation | 1.584 Frames/s |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex | 0.040 Frames/s |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition | 3.862 Frames/s |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining | 9.251 mHash/s |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen | 311 Frames |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan | 1098 Frames |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex | 1840 Frames |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen | 311.000 Fps |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan | 1098.000 Fps |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex | 1840.000 Fps |
Core frequency | 300MHz |
Process | 28nm |
Number of shaders | 128 |
Gaming performance
1. Counter-Strike: GO (2012)
2.X-Plane 11.11 (2018)
3. Team Fortress 2 (2017)
4. Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
5 Dirt Rally (2015)
6 Sims 4 (2014)
7. The Elder Scrolls Online (2014)
8. Thief (2014)
9. X-Plane 10.25 (2013)
10. Battlefield 4 (2013)
11. Total War: Rome II (2013)
12. Company of Heroes 2 (2013)
13. Metro: Last Light (2013)
14. BioShock Infinite (2013)
15. StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013)
16 SimCity (2013)
17. Tomb Raider (2013)
18. Crysis 3 (2013)
19 Hitman: Absolution (2012)
20. Borderlands 2 (2012)
21. Diablo III (2012)
22 Mass Effect 3 (2012)
23. The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)
24 Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011)
25. StarCraft 2 (2010)
26. Metro 2033 (2010)
27. World of Warcraft (2005)
Counter-Strike: GO (2012)
Low, 1024×768 | 19.30 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)
Low, 1280×720 | 4.69 |
Medium, 1920×1080 | 2.860046 |
Team Fortress 2 (2017)
Low, 1280×720 | 13.00 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
Low, 1280×720 | 12. 70 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 9.60 |
HIGH, 1920×1080 | 5.00 |
Ultra, 1920×1080 | 4.60 |
9003 DIRT RALLLLES
13.10 |
Sims 4 (2014)
Low, 1024×768 | 27.30 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 8.40 |
The Elder Scrolls Online (2014)
Low, 1024×768 | 17.10 |
Thief (2014)
Low, 1024×768 | 2.20 |
X-Plane 10.25 (2013)
Low, 1024×768 | 11.20 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 5.50 |
Battlefield 4 (2013)
Low, 1024×768 | 9. 90 |
Total War: Rome II (2013)
Low, 1024×768 | 9.70 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 7.20 |
Company of Heroes 21
Low, 1024×768 | 3.28 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 2.70 |
High, 1366×768 | 1.80 |
Metro: Last Light (2013)
Low, 1024×768 | 4.70 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 4.50 |
HIGH, 1366×768 | 3.00 |
Low, 1280×720 | 16.90 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 8.30 |
High, 1366×768 | 7.10 |
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013)
Low 1024×768 | 39. 20 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 15.40 |
HIGH, 1366×768 | |
Low, 1024×768 | 37.80 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 7.90 |
Tomb Raider (2013)
Low, 1024×768 | 15.80 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 8.80 |
HIGH, 1366×768 | 6.10 |
Crysis 3 (2013)
Low, 1024×768 | 8.80 |
Low, 1024×768 | 4.95 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 4.10 |
High, 1366×768 | 2.60 |
Borderlands 2 (2012)
Low, 1024×768 | 5.40 |
Diablo III (2012)
Low, 1024×768 | 21. 10 |
Medium, 13666×0038 | 14.00 |
High, 1366×768 | 11.05 |
Mass Effect 3 (2012)
Low, 1280×720 | 11.40 |
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)
Low, 1280×720 | 10.05 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 9.00 |
High, 1366×768 | 6.10 |
Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011)
Low, 1024×768 | 20.50 |
High, 1366×768 | 11.60 |
StarCraft 2 (2010)
Low, 1024×768 | 35.00 |
Medium, 1360×768 | 14.00 |
Metro 2033 (2010)
Low, 800×600 | 11.80 |
World of Warcraft
Issue date | 23 May 2013 |
OPN Tray | EM2100CJ23HM |
Place in the ranking | 2385 |
Series | AMD E1-Series APU for Laptops |
Applicability | Laptop |
Support 64 bit | |
Base frequency | 1GHz |
Crystal area | 246mm |
Level 2 cache | 1MB |
Process | 28nm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 90 °C |
Number of cores | 2 |
Number of threads | 2 |
Number of transistors | 1178 million |
Unlocked | |
Maximum number of memory channels | 1 |
Supported memory types | Not Listed |
Enduro | |
Integrated graphics | AMD Radeon HD 8210 |
Switchable graphics | |
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | |
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | |
DisplayPort | |
HDMI | |
DirectX | 12 |
Vulcan | |
Maximum number of processors in configuration | 1 |
Supported sockets | FT3 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 9 Watt |
PCI Express revision | 2. 0 |
AMD App Acceleration | |
AMD Elite Experiences | |
AMD HD3D technology | |
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | |
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | |
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | |
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | |
Intel® AES New Instructions | |
PowerGating | |
PowerNow | |
VirusProtect | |
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | |
IOMMU 2. 0 |
AMD E1-7010 Processor Review: Specifications, Benchmark Tests
The E1-7010 processor was released by AMD, release date: 7 May 2015. The processor is designed for laptop computers and built on the Carrizo-L architecture.
Processor unlocked for overclocking. The total number of cores — 2, threads — 2. The maximum clock frequency of the processor — 1.5 GHz. Maximum temperature — 90°C. Technological process — 28 nm. Cache size: L2 — 1 MB.
Supported memory type: DDR3L.
Supported socket type: FP4. Power consumption (TDP): 10 Watts.
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics is integrated into the processor with the following graphics settings: maximum frequency — 400 MHz.
Benchmarks
PassMark Single thread mark |
|
||||
PassMark CPU mark |
|
|
|||
Geekbench 4 Single Core |
|
||||
Geekbench 4 Multi-Core |
|
Name | Meaning |
---|---|
PassMark — Single thread mark | 492 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 582 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 164 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 302 |
Core frequency | 700MHz |
Floating point performance | 179. 2 gflops |
Process | 28nm |
Number of shader processors | 128 |
Texturing speed | 5.6 GTexel/s |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt |
Number of transistors | 930 million |
Gaming performance
1. Counter-Strike: GO (2012)
2. Team Fortress 2 (2017)
3 Rocket League (2017)
4 Prey (2017)
5. Farming Simulator 17 (2016)
6 Civilization VI (2016)
7. Overwatch (2016)
8 Rainbow Six Siege (2015)
9. World of Warships (2015)
10. Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
11. Dirt Rally (2015)
12. Dragon Age: Inquisition (2014)
13 Alien: Isolation (2014)
14 Sims 4 (2014)
15. BioShock Infinite (2013)
16. Tomb Raider (2013)
17. Diablo III (2012)
18. The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)
19. Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011)
20. Starcraft 2 (2010)
21. World of Warcraft (2005)
Counter-Strike: GO (2012)
Low, 1024×768 | 26.90 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 21.70 |
High, 1366×768 | 20.00 |
Team Fortress 2 (2017)
Low, 1280×720 | 19.70 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 18.50 |
Rocket League (2017)
Low, 1280×720 | 30.80 |
Low, 1280×720 | 9.40 |
Farming Simulator 17 (2016)
Low, 1280×720 | 43.50 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 26.40 |
Civilization VI (2016)
LOW, 1024×768 | 21.60 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 8. 50 |
Low, 1280×720 | 17.50 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 15.00 |
Rainbow Six Siege (2015)
Low, 1024×768 | 20.40 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 13.80 |
World of WarsHips (2015)
LOW, 1366×768 | 25.50 |
Medium, 1366×768 900 9.30 9.0038 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
Low, 1280×720 | 28.70 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 18.40 |
Dirt Rally (2015)
Low, 1024×768 | 25.10 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 13.00 |
DRAGON AGE: Inquisition (2014)
Low, 1024×7.2010046 | |
Medium, 1366×768 | 8. 70 |
Alien: Isolation (2014)
Low, 1024×768 | 17.80 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 10.30 |
Sims 4 (2014 )
LOW, 1024×768 | 82.10 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 20.70 |
BIOSHOCKCK INFINITE
Low, 1280×720 | 34.45 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 17.25 |
High, 1366×768 | 14.00 |
Tomb Raider (2013)
Low, 1024×768 | 35.70 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 15.70 |
HIGH, 1366×768 | 11.10 |
Diablo III (2012)
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)
Low, 1280×720 | 24.70 | |
Medium, 1366×768 | 16.370038 | 41.00 |
High, 1366×768 | 20.30 |
StarCraft 2 (2010)
Low, 1024×768 | 59.60 |
Medium, 1360×768 | 17.80 |
High, 1360×768 | 14.10 |
World of Warcraft (2005)
65.20 |
Medium, 10247.3.0038 |
Features
Architecture name | Carrizo-L |
Family | AMD E-Series Processors |
Production date | May 7, 2015 |
OPN Tray | EM7010JCY23JB |
Place in the ranking | 2618 |
Series | AMD E1-Series APU for Laptops |
Applicability | Laptop |
Support 64 bit | |
Base frequency | 1. 5 GHz |
Level 2 cache | 1MB |
Process | 28nm |
Maximum core temperature | 90°C |
Maximum frequency | 1.5 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 |
Number of threads | 2 |
Number of transistors | 930 Million |
Unlocked | |
Maximum number of memory channels | 1 |
Supported memory frequency | 1333 MHz |
Supported memory types | DDR3L |
Enduro | |
Maximum GPU clock | 400MHz |
Integrated graphics | AMD Radeon R2 Graphics |
Switchable graphics | |
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | |
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | |
DisplayPort | |
HDMI | |
DirectX | 12 |
Vulcan | |
Supported sockets | FP4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt |
PCI Express revision | 2. 0 |
AMD App Acceleration | |
AMD Elite Experiences | |
AMD HD3D technology | |
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | |
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | |
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | |
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | |
Intel® AES New Instructions | |
PowerGating | |
PowerNow | |
VirusProtect | |
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | |
IOMMU 2. 0 |
AMD E1-2100
Top specifications and features
- PassMark CPU score
- Cinebench score21.5 (single)
- Heat dissipation (TDP)
- Technological process
- Number of transistors
PassMark CPU
AMD E1-2100 score:
421
Best score:
89379
Test results for
AMD E1-2100:
3537
Best score:
Technologies
AMD E1-2100:
2500
Best score:
Performance
AMD E1-2100:
1002
Best score:
Memory specification
AMD E1-2100:
216
Best score:
Description
AMD E1-2100 processor runs at 1 Hz. 2 cores available. Power consumption at peak times can reach 9Tue
The maximum number of threads that AMD E1-2100 can handle is 2.
AMD E1-2100 works on 28nm architecture. Total number of transistors 1178 million
Regarding memory specification. The AMD E1-2100 processor supports DDR0. The maximum memory bandwidth is 10.7. Number of supported memory channels 1.
Speaking of AMD E1-2100 integrated graphics, AMD Radeon HD 8210 is installed here.
Now about AMD E1-2100 tests. According to PassMark, the processor scored 421 of the possible points. Based on the analysis of more than 4000 processors, AMD E1-2100 took the 2524th place in the ranking of the best.
Why AMD E1-2100 is better than others
- Thermal Dissipation (TDP) 9 W. This parameter is lower than 94%
- Technological process 28 nm. This parameter is lower than that of 49%
- PassMark CPU score 421 . This parameter is lower than 49%
- Cinebench score21.5 (single) 1 . This parameter is lower than 13%
- Number of transistors 1178 million. This parameter is lower than 23%
- Number of cores 2 . This parameter is lower than that of 87%
- Number of threads 2 . This setting is lower than 81%
- L2 cache size 1 MB. This parameter is lower than that of 58%
Review AMD E1-2100
Test results
Technology
Performance
Memory specification
Interfaces and communications
Main characteristics
AMD E1-2100 Review Highlights
PassMark CPU score
The PassMark benchmark considers read speed, write speed, and seek time when testing SSD performance.
Show all
421
max 89379
Average: 6033.5
89379
Cinebench21.5 score (single)
A benchmark that measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
one
max 51
Average: 5. 6
51
3DMark06 test score
812
max 18628
Average: 3892.6
18628
Cinebench R11.5 /64bit (Multi-Core) test score
0.4905
max 45.3622
Average: 5.3
45.3622
Cinebench R15 test score (Multi-Core)
38
max 4614
Average: 638.4
4614
Cinebench R15 test score (Single-Core)
21
max 276
Average: 128.5
276
IOMMU v2.0
Yes
AMD Enduro
Yes
Switchable Graphics
Yes
Vulkan API
Yes
AES
Yes
Number of threads
The more threads, the higher the performance of the processor, and it will be able to perform several tasks at the same time.
Show all
2
max 256
Average: 10.7
256
L2 Cache Size
L2 cache with large scratchpad memory can increase processor speed and overall system performance.
Show all
1MB
max 512
Average: 4.5 MB
512MB
Number of cores
2
max 72
Mean: 5.8
72
Processor base clock speed
1GHz
max 4.7
Average: 2.5 GHz
4.7GHz
Unlocked CPU multiplier
Some processors have an unlocked multiplier, which makes them faster and better in games and other applications.
Show all
No
Graphics
AMD Radeon HD 8210
Max. number of processors in configuration
one
Mean: 1.3
8
DDR version
0
Mean: 3.5
5
Max. memory bandwidth
This is the speed at which the device stores or reads information.
10.7GB/s
max 352
Average: 41.4 GB/s
352GB/s
Max. number of memory channels
The greater their number, the higher the data transfer rate from memory to processor
one
max 16
Mean: 2. 9
16
ECC memory support
Memory debugging code is used when it is necessary to avoid data corruption during scientific computing or server startup. It finds possible errors and repairs data corruption.
Show all
Yes
Intel® AES-NI Commands
AES is needed to speed up encryption and decryption.
Yes
AVX
AVX allows you to increase the speed of calculations in multimedia, financial and scientific applications, it also improves the performance of Linux RAID.
Show all
Yes
Version sse
Allows you to speed up multimedia tasks (such as adjusting the sound intensity). Each subsequent version has a number of improvements
Show all
four
max 4.2
Mean: 4. 1
4.2
Socket
FT3
AMD Virtualization Technology
Yes
DisplayPort
Yes
HDMI
Yes
Process technology
The small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip.
28 nm
Average: 36.8 nm
5 nm
Number of transistors
1178 million
max 57000
Average: 1517.3 million
57000 million
Heat Dissipation (TDP)
The Heat Dissipation Requirements (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
Show all
9W
Average: 67. 6 W
0.025W
Line
AMD E-Series Processors
DirectX
Used in demanding games, providing enhanced graphics
0
max 12.1
Average: 12
12.1
Code name
Kabini
Maximum temperature Tcase
90°C
max 105
Average: 75.1 °C
105°C
Destination
Laptop
FAQ
How fast is the AMD E1-2100 5600X?
The processor runs at 1 GHz.
How many cores does the AMD E1-2100 have?
2 cores
Does AMD E1-2100 support ECC memory?
Yes.
Does the AMD E1-2100 have integrated graphics?
AMD Radeon HD 8210
What RAM does AMD E1-2100 support
AMD E1-2100 supports DDR0.