Amd fx 4350 vs fx 6300: AMD FX-4350 vs AMD FX-6300: What is the difference?

IntroductionGeneral PerformanceVideo Transcoding & Visual Studio 2012 PerformancePhotoshop & 3D Rendering Performance3D Gaming PerformancePower ConsumptionProjected Performance: Can AMD Catch up with Intel?OverclockingFinal Words

Last year’s launch of AMD’s FX processors was honestly disappointing. The Bulldozer CPU cores that were bundled into each Zambezi chip were hardly power efficient and in many areas couldn’t significantly outperform AMD’s previous generation platform. Look beyond the direct AMD comparison and the situation looked even worse. In our conclusion to last year’s FX-8150 review I wrote the following:

«Single threaded performance is my biggest concern, and compared to Sandy Bridge there’s a good 40-50% advantage the i5 2500K enjoys over the FX-8150. My hope is that future derivatives of the FX processor (perhaps based on Piledriver) will boast much more aggressive Turbo Core frequencies, which would do wonders at eating into that advantage.»

The performance advantage that Intel enjoyed at the time was beyond what could be erased by a single generation. To make matters worse, before AMD could rev Bulldozer, Intel already began shipping Ivy Bridge — a part that not only increased performance but decreased power consumption as well. It’s been a rough road for AMD over these past few years, but you have to give credit where it’s due: we haven’t seen AMD executing this consistently in quite a while. As promised we’ve now had multiple generations of each platform ship from AMD. Brazos had a mild update, Llano paved the way for Trinity which is now shipping, and around a year after Zambezi’s launch we have Vishera: the Piledriver based AMD FX successor.

At a high level, Vishera swaps out the Bulldozer cores from Zambezi and replaces them with Piledriver. This is the same CPU core that is used in Trinity, but it’s optimized for a very different purpose here in Vishera. While Trinity had to worry about working nicely in a laptop, Vishera is strictly a high-end desktop/workstation part. There’s no on-die graphics for starters. Clock speeds and TDPs are also up compared to Trinity.

CPU Specification Comparison
CPU	Manufacturing Process	Cores	Transistor Count	Die Size
AMD Vishera 8C	32nm	8	1. 2B	315mm2
AMD Zambezi 8C	32nm	8	1.2B	315mm2
Intel Ivy Bridge 4C	22nm	4	1.4B	160mm2
Intel Sandy Bridge E (6C)	32nm	6	2.27B	435mm2
Intel Sandy Bridge E (4C)	32nm	4	1. 27B	294mm2
Intel Sandy Bridge 4C	32nm	4	1.16B	216mm2
Intel Lynnfield 4C	45nm	4	774M	296mm2
Intel Sandy Bridge 2C (GT1)	32nm	2	504M	131mm2
Intel Sandy Bridge 2C (GT2)	32nm	2	624M	149mm2

Vishera is still built on the same 32nm GlobalFoundries SOI process as Zambezi, which means there isn’t much room for additional architectural complexity without ballooning die area, and not a whole lot of hope for significantly decreasing power consumption. As a fabless semiconductor manufacturer, AMD is now at GF’s mercy when it comes to moving process technology forward. It simply has to make 32nm work for now. Piledriver is a light evolution over Bulldozer, so there’s actually no substantial increase in die area compared to the previous generation. Cache sizes remain the same as well, which keeps everything roughly the same. These chips are obviously much larger than Intel’s 22nm Ivy Bridge parts, but Intel has a full node advantage there which enables that.

Piledriver is a bit more power efficient than Bulldozer, which enables AMD to drive Vishera’s frequency up while remaining in the same thermal envelope as Zambezi. The new lineup is in the table below:

CPU Specification Comparison
Processor	Codename	Cores	Clock Speed	Max Turbo	L2/L3 Cache	TDP	Price
AMD FX-8350	Vishera	8	4. 0GHz	4.2GHz	8MB/8MB	125W	$199
AMD FX-8150	Zambezi	8	3.6GHz	4.2GHz	8MB/8MB	125W	$183
AMD FX-8320	Vishera	8	3.5GHz	4.0GHz	8MB/8MB	125W	$169
AMD FX-8120	Zambezi	8	3. 1GHz	4.0GHz	8MB/8MB	125W	$153
AMD FX-6300	Vishera	6	3.5GHz	4.1GHz	6MB/8MB	95W	$132
AMD FX-6100	Zambezi	6	3.3GHz	3.9GHz	6MB/8MB	95W	$112
AMD FX-4300	Vishera	4	3. 8GHz	4.0GHz	4MB/4MB	95W	$122
AMD FX-4100	Zambezi	4	3.6GHz	3.8GHz	4MB/4MB	95W	$101

The table above says it all. TDPs haven’t changed, cache sizes haven’t changed and neither have core counts. Across the board Vishera ships at higher base frequencies than the equivalent Zambezi part, but without increasing max turbo frequency (in the case of the 8-core parts). The 6 and 4 core versions get boosts to both sides, without increasing TDP. In our Trinity notebook review I called the new CPU core Bulldozed Tuned. The table above supports that characterization.

It’s also important to note that AMD’s pricing this time around is far more sensible. While the FX-8150 debuted at $245, the 8350 drops that price to $199 putting it around $40 less than the Core i5 3570K. The chart below shows where AMD expects all of these CPUs to do battle:

AMD’s targets are similar to what they were last time: Intel’s Core i5 and below. All of the FX processors remain unlocked and ship fully featured with hardware AES acceleration enabled. Most Socket-AM3+ motherboards on the market today should support the new parts with nothing more than a BIOS update. In fact, I used the same ASUS Crosshair V Formula motherboard I used last year (with a much newer BIOS) for today’s review:

For more comparisons be sure to check out our performance database: Bench.

Motherboard:	ASUS Maximus V Gene (Intel Z77) ASUS Crosshair V Formula (AMD 990FX)
Hard Disk:	Intel X25-M SSD (80GB) Crucial RealSSD C300 OCZ Agility 3 (240GB) Samsung SSD 830 (512GB)
Memory:	4 x 4GB G. Skill Ripjaws X DDR3-1600 9-9-9-20
Video Card:	ATI Radeon HD 5870 (Windows 7) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 (Windows 8)
Desktop Resolution:	1920 x 1200
OS:	Windows 7 x64/Windows 8 Pro x64

General Performance
IntroductionGeneral PerformanceVideo Transcoding & Visual Studio 2012 PerformancePhotoshop & 3D Rendering Performance3D Gaming PerformancePower ConsumptionProjected Performance: Can AMD Catch up with Intel?OverclockingFinal Words

Tweet

PRINT THIS ARTICLE

Apex Legends system requirements | Can I Run Apex Legends

Check Pricing

Can I Run Apex Legends

Check the Apex Legends system requirements. Can I Run it? Test your specs and rate your gaming PC. System requirements Lab runs millions of PC requirements tests on over 8,500 games a month.

Can You Run It?   

Here are the

Apex Legends System Requirements (Minimum)

• CPU: Intel Core i3-6300 3.8GHz / AMD FX-4350 4.2 GHz Quad-Core Processor
• CPU SPEED: Info
• RAM: 6 GB
• OS: 64-bit Windows 7
• VIDEO CARD: 1 GB NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 / Radeon HD 7730
• PIXEL SHADER: 5.0
• VERTEX SHADER: 5.0
• FREE DISK SPACE: 56 GB
• DEDICATED VIDEO RAM: 1 GB

Click here to see Recommended Computer

Apex Legends Recommended Requirements

• CPU: Intel i5 3570K / Ryzen 5 CPU or equivalent
• CPU SPEED: Info
• RAM: 8 GB
• OS: 64-bit Windows 7
• VIDEO CARD: 8 GB Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 / AMD Radeon R9 290
• PIXEL SHADER: 5. 1
• VERTEX SHADER: 5.1
• FREE DISK SPACE: 56 GB
• DEDICATED VIDEO RAM: 8 GB

Latest Graphic Cards

Click here for the latest video card drivers

Online games
Test Latency

Can my computer play Apex Legends?

Apex Legends Min & Rec Specs — Find out if you can Run it. Apex Legends PC Specs — Can You Run Apex Legends Recommended Requirements?

Updated November 19, 2020 By Cliff Henjum
We are now a couple of weeks into Season 7 of Apex Legends, the free to play character-based Battle Royale from Respawn Entertainment. Reswan has continued to update the game with new weapons, characters, and items. The low system requirements for Apex Legends allows for a much larger variety of computers to run it, especially when compared to other Battle Royales like CoD Warzone. The Intel Core i3-6300 and the AMD FX-4350 are the minimum CPU benchmark to run Apex Legends on Low Graphics. Take the official system requirements test to determine if your hardware has what it takes.

By Cliff Henjum March 1, 2019

In a surprise announcement, Respawn Entertainment and EA Games launched a free to play battle royale game called Apex Legends! It’s set in the Titanfall universe and (at least at time of launch) features 20 teams of 3 for a maximum of 60 players per round. Apex Legends has some cool features that help set it apart from other battle royale games like the ability to revive dead teammates and a unique class system that will enhance various playstyles. On top of these gameplay mechanics, Apex Legends has created an impressive communication system that enables squadmates to communicate quickly and precisely during the heat of battle that is currently unrivaled. The game’s aesthetic, pace of play, and gun mechanics feel like Blackops 4’s Blackout with many more mobility options due to the abilities from your specific class. However, despite looking more like Black Ops 4, its system requirements are actually closer to that of Fortnite and PUBG Lite.

Due to the smaller player count, and a smaller map compared to some of PUBG’s choices, the minimum system requirements for Apex Legends are much lower than PUBG or BO4. Whether you’re grapple-hooking with Pathfinder, or running through portals as Wraith, you’ll want a computer that’s above the minimum requirements so you can enjoy a playable framerate. In order to pass the minimum video card requirement, your PC will need at least a GeForce GT 640 or a Radeon HD 7700. In contrast to Fortnite, you will need a bit more RAM to get Apex Legends running — 6 GB as opposed to 4 GB. Your computer also needs a halfway decent CPU — something along the lines of a Core i3-6300 or AMD FX-4350. If your computer meets these requirements, you’ll be hot dropping on to drop ships and down to Skull Town in no time.

In order to run Apex Legends on High or Max settings, your computer needs to pass the recommended system requirements. There is a pretty big jump in overall computing power between the minimum and recommended requirements. For a CPU, your PC needs at least a Core i5-3570K or its AMD equivalent. The recommended video card brings the requirement closer to Black Ops 4 and further away from PUBG Lite. A whopping GeForce GTX 970 or Radeon R9 290 are the recommended video card models if you want to push back that view distance and up those texture details. The required RAM shouldn’t break the bank — only 8 GB is needed as opposed to the 16 GB that PUBG requires.

The plethora of unique changes and additions to the battle royale genre will more than likely keep Apex Legends in the conversation for a long time to come. It’s free to play, it has pretty low system requirements for a battle royale, and it actually had a pretty smooth launch which is more than a lot of these other copycat games can claim. If Apex Legends rolls out regular content updates without messing up the game’s core mechanics (looking at you Realm Royale), we anticipate that it remains in the top 3 most played battle royale games for 2019.

Similar Games System Requirements

Fortnite

PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS

Call of Duty: Warzone

Below are some gaming computers with images that show how many games will run on each.
Each computer was tested against the minimum and recommended requirements of over 8,500 of the latest PC games.
Click here for more options.

System Requirements Lab may earn affiliate commissions from qualifying purchases via Amazon Associates, eBay Affiliates and other programs

AMD FX-4350 vs AMD FX-6300: What is the difference?

Smartphone-graphic wire headphones

39 BALLLA

AMD FX-4350

40 BALLLA

AMD FX-6300

VS

64 Facts compared to

AMD FX-4350

AMD FXD FX-6300 9000 9000 AMD FX Is 4350 better than AMD FX-6300?

• 0. 67MB/core more L3 cache per core?
  2MB/core vs 1.33MB/core

• 25% higher CPU speed?
  6 x 3.5GHz vs 4 x 4.2GHz
• 2 more CPU threads?
  6 vs 4
• 2MB more L2 cache?
  6MB vs 4MB
• 30W below TDP?
  95W vs 125W
• 1 newer PCI Express (PCIe) version?
  3 vs 2
• 96KB more L1 cache?
  288KB vs 192KB

What are the most popular comparisons?

AMD RYZEN 5 5500U

VS

Intel Core i5-1135g7

AMD Ryzen 3 3250U

VS

Intel Core I3-1115g4

AMD Ryzen 3 5300U

VS 9000 VS 9000.9000 9000. AMD Ryzen 7 3700U

vs

Intel Core i5-10210U

AMD Ryzen 7 3700U

vs

Intel Core i5-1135G7

AMD Ryzen 5

VS

Intel Core i5-10300h

Intel Core i3-1115G4

VS

Intel Core i5-10210u 9000u

AMD Ryzen 5 3500U 9000 VS 9000u 9000u 9000u 9000u 9000 AMD AMD AMD AMD

VS

Intel Core i3-1115g4

AMD Ryzen 7 5800h

VS

Intel Core i7-11800H

Complexation of

Users

Foreign rating

AMD FX-4350

0 Reviews of Users

AMD FX-4350

0. 0 /10

0 Reviews of users

AMD FX-6300

2 reviews of users

AMD FX-6300

9.5 /10 9000

Reviews 2 reviews Users

Functions

The price ratio

reviews is not

/10

2 Votes

Games

reviews yet there are no

8.0 /10

2 Votes

performance

Reviews yet not

8.5 /10

2 Votes

Reliability

9000 9000 9000 9000 8.5

2 votes

Energy efficiency

No reviews yet

7.5 /10

2 votes

CPU speed

0003

4 x 4.2GHz

6 x 3.5GHz

CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second a processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.

2nd processor thread

More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.

3.speed turbo clock

4.3GHz

4.1GHz

When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

4. Unlocked

✔AMD FX-4350

✔AMD FX-6300

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.

5.L2 cache

More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

6.L3 cache

More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

7.L1 cache

More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

8.core L2

1MB/core

1MB/core

More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

9.core L3

2MB/core

1.33MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

Memory

1.RAM speed

1866MHz

1866MHz

Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.

2.max memory bandwidth

21GB/s

21GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3rd DDR memory version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-4350)

DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of main memory. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.

4.Memory channels

More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.

5.max memory

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-4350)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)

Maximum amount of memory (RAM).

6.baud rate bus

5.4GT/s

5.4GT/s

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7.Supports memory error recovery code

✖AMD FX-4350

✖AMD FX-6300

Memory error recovery code can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-4350)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)

The newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.

9.bus frequency

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-4350)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device

Geotagging

1. PassMark result

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-4350)

This test measures processor performance using multithreading.

2nd PassMark result (single)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-4350)

This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-4350)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

4. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-4350)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-4350)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)

Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-4350)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7. Blender test result (bmw27)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-4350)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)

The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

8.Blender result (classroom)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-4350)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)

The Blender (classroom) test measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

9.power per watt

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-4350)

This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.

Functions

1.uses multi-threading

✖AMD FX-4350

✖AMD FX-6300

processor into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.

2. Has AES

✔AMD FX-4350

✔AMD FX-6300

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3. Has AVX

✔AMD FX-4350

✔AMD FX-6300

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.

4.Version SSE

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5. Has F16C

✔AMD FX-4350

✔AMD FX-6300

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.

6.bits transmitted at the same time

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-4350)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)

NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.

7. Has MMX

✔AMD FX-4350

✔AMD FX-6300

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

8. TrustZone enabled

✖AMD FX-4350

✖AMD FX-6300

Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and digital rights management (DRM) video streaming .

9.interface width

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-4350)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)

The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which CPUs are better?

This page is currently only available in English.

Comparison of AMD FX-4350 and AMD FX-6300

Comparative analysis of AMD FX-4350 and AMD FX-6300 processors according to all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Technologies, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation ( Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s).

AMD FX-4350

versus

AMD FX-6300

Advantages

Reasons to select AMD FX-4350

• The processor is more than 6 MONTH (S)
• The processor is unlocked, the unlocked factor allows you to easily make an airplane
• 13% more clock speed: 4.3 GHz vs 3.8 GHz
• Performance in PassMark — Single thread mark about 8% more: 1605 vs 1489
• Geekbench 4 — Single Core performance about 9% better: 572 vs 527

Release date	April 2013 vs October 2012
Unlocked	Unlocked / Locked
Maximum frequency	4. 3 GHz vs 3.8 GHz
PassMark — Single thread mark	1605 vs 1489
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	572 vs 527

Reasons to choose AMD FX-6300

• 2 more cores, ability to run more applications simultaneously: 6 vs 4
• 2 more threads: 6 vs 4
• About 15% more max core temperature: 70.50°C vs 61.10°C
• About 50% more L1 cache means more data can be stored in it for quick access
• About 50% more L2 cache means more data can be stored in it for quick access
• Approximately 32% less power consumption: 95 Watt vs 125 Watt
• Performance in PassMark — CPU mark about 28% more: 4176 vs 3267
• Performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi- Core about 20% more: 1914 vs 1589
• Approximately 27% more performance in CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.905 vs 5.452
• Approximately 38% improvement in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) : 16.195 vs 11.727
• CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) about 63% more performance: 0.339 vs 0.208
• CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) about 35% faster more: 4.767 vs 3.54

Number of cores	6 vs 4
Number of threads	6 vs 4
Maximum core temperature	70.50°C vs 61.10°C
Level 1 cache	288 KB vs 192 KB
Level 2 cache	6MB vs 4MB
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt vs 125 Watt
PassMark — CPU mark	4176 vs 3267
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	1914 vs 1589
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	6.905 vs 5.452
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	16.195 vs 11.727
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.339 vs 0.208
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	4.767 vs 3.54

Benchmark comparison

CPU 1: AMD FX-4350
CPU 2: AMD FX-6300

PassMark — Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2
PassMark — CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2
Geekbench 4 — Multi Core	CPU 1 CPU 2
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	11.727 16.195
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2

Name	AMD FX-4350	AMD FX-6300
PassMark — Single thread mark	1605	1489
PassMark — CPU mark	3267	4176
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	572	527
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	1589	1914
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	5.452	6.905
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	11.727	16.195
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.208	0.339
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	3.54	4.767
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score		2098
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)		0.85

Feature comparison

configuration

	AMD FX-4350	AMD FX-6300
Architecture name	Vishera	Vishera
Family	AMD FX-Series Processors	AMD FX-Series Processors
Issue date	April 2013	October 2012
OPN PIB	FD4350FRHKBOX	FD6300WMHKBOX
OPN Tray	FD4350FRW4KHK	FD6300WMW6KHK
Place in the rating	1979	1981
Price now	$129. 99	$58.99
Series	AMD FX 4-Core Black Edition Processors	AMD FX 6-Core Black Edition Processors
Price/performance ratio (0-100)	12.09	31.81
Applicability	Desktop	Desktop
Support 64 bit
Base frequency	4.2 GHz	3.5 GHz
Crystal area	315 mm	315 mm
Level 1 cache	192KB	288KB
Level 2 cache	4MB	6MB
Level 3 cache	8MB	8MB
Process	32nm SOI	32nm SOI
Maximum core temperature	61. 10°C	70.50°C
Maximum frequency	4.3 GHz	3.8 GHz
Number of cores	4	6
Number of threads	4	6
Voltage P0 Vcore	Min: 1.275 V — Max: 1.4 V	Min: 1.15V — Max: 1.3875V
Number of transistors	1200 million	1200 million
Unlocked
Supported memory frequency	1866 MHz	1866 MHz
Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR3
Maximum number of processors in	1	1
Supported sockets	AM3+	AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)	125 Watt	95 Watt
PCI Express revision	n/a	3. 0
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4)
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)

AMD FX-4350 vs. AMD FX-6300

AMD FX-4350

AMD FX-4350 runs with 4 and 4 CPU threads It runs at 4.30 GHz base 4.30 GHz all cores while the TDP is set to 125 W .The processor plugs into an AM3+ CPU socket This version includes 8. 00 MB of L3 cache on a single chip, supports 2 to support DDR3-1866 RAM, and supports PCIe Gen . Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, the Vishera (Bulldozer) Architecture is advanced beyond 32 nm and supports AMD-V . The product was launched Q2/2013

AMD FX-6300

AMD FX-6300 runs with 6 and 4 CPU threads It runs at 4.10 GHz base 4.10 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 95 W .CPU connects to AM3+ CPU socket This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen . Tjunction stays below 71°C degrees C. In particular, the Vishera (Bulldozer) architecture is advanced over 32 nm and supports AMD-V. The product was launched Q4/2012

AMD FX-4350

AMD FX-6300

Show more details

Show more details

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies that can also be textured and animated in the program. The Blender test creates predefined scenes and measures the time(s) required for the entire scene. The less time it takes, the better. We chose the bmw27 as our reference scene.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the processors listed below have been tested with CPU-Comparison. However, most of the processors were not tested and the results were evaluated by the secret patented CPU-Comparison formula. As such, they do not accurately reflect the actual values ​​of Passmark CPU ratings and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Energy usage estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU usage (0-100%)

Cost of electricity, USD/kWh

Energy usage estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU usage (0-100%)

Cost of electricity, USD/kWh

Comments

Intel Core i3-4350 or AMD FX-6300

• Main Page

0029

• FX-6350 SIX-Core
  Compare

Speed ​​in games

Core i3-4350

55. 8 (+5.7%)