AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i5-4670K
UserBenchmark: AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i5-4670K
- CPU
- GPU
- SSD
- HDD
- RAM
- USB
BX80646I54670K
FD8350FRHKBOX
VS
YouTube*NEW*
About
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 500,597 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
134,745 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 87% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 61% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Poor: 61%
Great: 87%
SPEED RANK: 240th / 1368
Gaming 76% Battleship |
Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier |
Workstation 57% Gunboat |
365,852 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 69% Base clock 4. 8 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 53% Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Poor: 53%
Great: 69%
SPEED RANK: 503rd / 1368
Gaming 63% Destroyer |
Desktop 65% Destroyer |
Workstation 49% Yacht |
Effective Speed Effective CPU Speed |
76.1 % | Faster effective speed. +21% |
62.7 % |
Memory Avg. Memory Latency |
86.3 Pts | Slightly lower memory latency. +6% |
81. 8 Pts | |||
1-Core Avg. Single Core Speed |
104 Pts | Much faster single-core speed. +51% |
68.8 Pts | |||
2-Core Avg. Dual Core Speed |
205 Pts | Much faster dual-core speed. +59% |
129 Pts | |||
4-Core Avg. Quad Core Speed |
381 Pts | Much faster quad-core speed. +61% |
237 Pts | |||
8-Core Avg. Octa Core Speed |
386 Pts | +2% | 377 Pts |
Memory OC Memory Latency |
95. 7 Pts | +5% | 91.5 Pts | |||
1-Core OC Single Core Speed |
123 Pts | Much faster OC single-core speed. +62% |
75.9 Pts | |||
2-Core OC Dual Core Speed |
244 Pts | Much faster OC dual-core speed. +64% |
149 Pts | |||
4-Core OC Quad Core Speed |
467 Pts | Much faster OC quad-core speed. +68% |
278 Pts | |||
8-Core OC Octa Core Speed |
472 Pts | Slightly faster OC octa-core speed. +10% |
430 Pts |
Market Share
Based on 56,189,247 CPUs tested.
See market share leaders
Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days) |
0.17 % | Much higher market share. +55% |
0.11 % | |||
Value Value For Money |
100 % | Better value. +30% |
77.2 % | |||
User Rating UBM User Rating |
61 % | Slightly more popular. +9% |
56 % | |||
Price Price (score) |
$102 | Cheaper. +22% |
$130 |
Age Newest |
112 Months | Slightly more recent. +7% |
120 Months | |||
TDP Thermal Design Power (TDP) |
84 Watts | Much more energy efficient. +33% |
125 Watts | |||
Cores CPU Processing Cores |
4 cores | 8 cores | Hugely higher core count. +100% |
|||
Threads CPU Processing Threads |
4 threads | 8 threads | Hugely higher thread count. +100% |
|||
Lithography Manufacturing process |
22 nm | Much newer manufacturing. +31% |
32 nm | |||
Base Clock Base Clock Speed |
3.4 GHz | 4 GHz | Faster base frequency. +18% |
|||
Turbo Clock Turbo Clock Speed |
3.8 GHz | 4.2 GHz | Faster turbo frequency. +11% |
|||
64-Core OC Multi Core Speed |
470 Pts | Slightly faster OC 64-core speed. +9% |
431 Pts | |||
64-Core Avg. Multi Core Speed |
388 Pts | +1% | 383 Pts |
Series CPU Architecture |
Haswell | Piledriver | ||||
Socket Motherboard Socket |
FCLGA1150 | AM3+ | ||||
Graphics Integrated Graphics |
HD 4600 | None |
ADVERTISEMENT
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.
CHOOSE A COMPONENT:
CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance)
October 2022 CPU Rankings.
We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]
ADVERTISEMENT
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.
Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.
UserBenchmark of the month
Gaming
Desktop
ProGaming
CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB
How it works
- — Download and run UserBenchmark.
- — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
- — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
- — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- — See speed test results from other users.
- — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Frequently Asked Questions
Best User Rated
-
Intel Core i5-12600K
-
Intel Core i5-12400F
-
Intel Core i5-13600K
-
Intel Core i7-12700K
-
Intel Core i5-12400
-
Intel Core i9-13900K
-
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
-
Intel Core i3-12100F
-
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
-
Intel Core i3-12100
-
Intel Core i7-11700K
-
Intel Core i5-11400F
About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube
Feedback
AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i5-4670K: What is the difference?
35points
AMD FX-8350
43points
Intel Core i5-4670K
Comparison winner
vs
64 facts in comparison
AMD FX-8350
Intel Core i5-4670K
Why is AMD FX-8350 better than Intel Core i5-4670K?
- 2. 35x faster CPU speed?
8 x 4GHzvs4 x 3.4GHz - 266MHz higher ram speed?
1866MHzvs1600MHz - 4 more CPU threads?
8vs4 - 7MB bigger L2 cache?
8MBvs1MB - 0.4GHz higher turbo clock speed?
4.2GHzvs3.8GHz - 2MB bigger L3 cache?
8MBvs6MB - 128KB bigger L1 cache?
384KBvs256KB - 0.75MB/core more L2 cache per core?
1MB/corevs0.25MB/core
Why is Intel Core i5-4670K better than AMD FX-8350?
- 11.72°C higher maximum operating temperature?
72.72°Cvs61°C - 10nm smaller semiconductor size?
22nmvs32nm - 27.44% higher PassMark result?
7552vs5926 - 41W lower TDP?
84Wvs125W - 1 newer version of PCI Express (PCIe)?
3vs2 - Has integrated graphics?
- 4. 6GB/s more memory bandwidth?
25.6GB/svs21GB/s - 38.32% higher PassMark result (single)?
2162vs1563
Which are the most popular comparisons?
AMD FX-8350
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Intel Core i5-4670K
vs
AMD Pro A4-8350B
AMD FX-8350
vs
AMD Phenom II X4 965
Intel Core i5-4670K
vs
Intel Core i7-4790K
AMD FX-8350
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
Intel Core i5-4670K
vs
Intel Core i5-4690K
AMD FX-8350
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
Intel Core i5-4670K
vs
Intel Core i3-6100
AMD FX-8350
vs
Intel Core i7-4770
Intel Core i5-4670K
vs
Intel Core i5-12400
AMD FX-8350
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
Intel Core i5-4670K
vs
Intel Core i7-4770K
AMD FX-8350
vs
Intel Core i7-3770
Intel Core i5-4670K
vs
AMD A10-7850K
AMD FX-8350
vs
Intel Core i7-4770K
Intel Core i5-4670K
vs
AMD Phenom II X4 965
AMD FX-8350
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
Intel Core i5-4670K
vs
Intel Core i7-4770
AMD FX-8350
vs
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
Intel Core i5-4670K
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
AMD FX-8350
5 User reviews
AMD FX-8350
9. 8/10
5 User reviews
Intel Core i5-4670K
0 User reviews
Intel Core i5-4670K
0.0/10
0 User reviews
Features
Value for money
9.6/10
5 votes
No reviews yet
Gaming
9.6/10
5 votes
No reviews yet
Performance
9.2/10
5 votes
No reviews yet
Reliability
9.6/10
5 votes
No reviews yet
Energy efficiency
8.6/10
5 votes
No reviews yet
Performance
1.CPU speed
8 x 4GHz
4 x 3.4GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
2. CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
3.turbo clock speed
4.2GHz
3.8GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
4.Has an unlocked multiplier
✔AMD FX-8350
✔Intel Core i5-4670K
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
5.L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
6.L3 cache
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
7.L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
8.L2 core
1MB/core
0. 25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
9.L3 core
1MB/core
1.5MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Memory
1.RAM speed
1866MHz
1600MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
21GB/s
25.6GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
4.memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
5. maximum memory amount
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
6.bus transfer rate
5.4GT/s
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4670K)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7.Supports ECC memory
✖AMD FX-8350
✖Intel Core i5-4670K
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8350)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4670K)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
9. bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8350)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4670K)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Benchmarks
1.PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
2.PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4670K)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4670K)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 (single) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4670K)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4670K)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7.Blender (bmw27) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8350)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4670K)
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
8.Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8350)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4670K)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
9.performance per watt
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4670K)
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✖AMD FX-8350
✖Intel Core i5-4670K
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
2.Has AES
✔AMD FX-8350
✔Intel Core i5-4670K
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3.Has AVX
✔AMD FX-8350
✔Intel Core i5-4670K
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
4.SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔AMD FX-8350
✔Intel Core i5-4670K
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
6.bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8350)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4670K)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
7.Has MMX
✔AMD FX-8350
✔Intel Core i5-4670K
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖AMD FX-8350
✖Intel Core i5-4670K
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
9.front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8350)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4670K)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best CPUs?
AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i5-7400: What is the difference?
35 BALLLA
AMD FX-8350
49 BALLLA
Intel Core i5-7400
Winter when comparing
VS
64 Facts compared to
AMD FX-8350 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 Is FX-8350 better than Intel Core i5-7400?
- 2. 67x higher CPU speed?
8 x 4GHz vs 4 x 3GHz - 4 more CPU threads?
8 vs 4 - 7MB more L2 cache?
8MB vs 1MB - 0.7GHz higher turbo clock speed?
4.2GHz vs 3.5GHz - 2MB more L3 cache?
8MB vs 6MB - 128KB more L1 cache?
384KB vs 256KB - Has an unlocked multiplier?
- 0.75MB/core more L2 cache per core?
1MB/core vs 0.25MB/core
Why is Intel Core i5-7400 better than AMD FX-8350?
- 534MHz higher RAM speed?
2400MHz vs 1866MHz - 39°C higher than maximum operating temperature?
100°C vs 61°C - Are 18nm smaller semiconductors?
14nm vs 32nm - 24.76% higher PassMark score?
7393 vs 5926 - 60W below TDP?
65W vs 125W - 1 newer PCI Express (PCIe) version?
3 vs 2 - Has integrated graphics?
- 17. 4GB/s more memory bandwidth?
38.4GB/s vs 21GB/s
Which comparisons are the most popular?
AMD FX-8350
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Intel Core i5-7400
vs
Intel Core i3-10100
AMD FX-8350
VS
AMD Phenom II X4 965
Intel Core i5-7400
AMD RYZEN 3 2200G
AMD FX-8350
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5 5 Core i5-7400
VS
Intel Core i7-3770
AMD FX-8350
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
Intel Core I5-7400
VS
AMD AMD FX- 8350
vs
Intel Core i7-4770
Intel Core i5-7400
VS
Intel Core i7-4770
AMD FX-8350
VS
AMD RYZEN 5 5500U
Intel Core I5-7400 VS AMD RYZEN 3 3200G
AMD FX-8350
VS
Intel Core i7-3770
Intel Core i5-7400
VS
AMD A10-9700
AMD FX-8350
VS 9000 VS 9000) -4770K
Intel Core i5-7400
VS
AMD FX-6300
AMD FX-8350
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5600x
Intel Core i5-7400
VS
Intel Core i3-9100f
AMD FX-8350 9
AMD RYZEN 3 3200G
Intel Core i5-7400
VS
Intel Core i7-7500u
Comers
Reviews Users
0004 AMD FX-8350
9. 8 /10
5 Reviews of users
Intel Core i5-7400
3 Reviews of users
Intel Core i5-7400
8.7 /10
3 reviews of users 9000 Functions
The price ratio
9.6 /10
5 Votes
/10
3 Votes
Games
/10
003
8.3 /10
3 Votes
/10
5 Votes
8.7 /10
Votes
9000
9.0 /10
3 VOTES
Energy efficiency
8.6 /10
5 VOTES
10.0 /10
9000 3 VOTES
performance 900 200021
1. CPU speed
8 x 4GHz
4 x 3GHz
CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second a processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
2nd processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
3.speed turbo clock
4.2GHz
3.5GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
4. Unlocked
✔AMD FX-8350
✖Intel Core i5-7400
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.
5.L2 cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
6.L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
7.L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
8.core L2
1MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
9.core L3
1MB/core
1.5MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Memory
1.RAM speed
1866MHz
2400MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
2.max memory bandwidth
21GB/s
38.4GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3. DDR version
DDR (Dynamic Dynamic Random Access Memory Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
4.Memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
5.maximum memory capacity
Maximum memory capacity (RAM).
6.baud rate bus
5.4GT/s
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7.Supports memory troubleshooting code
✖AMD FX-8350
✖Intel Core i5-7400
Memory error recovery code can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-7400)
A newer version of eMMC — Built-in Flash Memory Card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
9.bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-7400)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Geotagging
1. PassMark result
This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.
2. PassMark result (single)
This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-7400)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)
4. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-7400)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
5. Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-7400)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-7400)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7. Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-7400)
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
8.Blender result (classroom)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-7400)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
9.performance per watt
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-7400)
This means that the processor is more efficient, resulting in more performance per watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✖AMD FX-8350
✖Intel Core i5-7400
processor cores into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
2. Has AES
✔AMD FX-8350
✔Intel Core i5-7400
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3. Has AVX
✔AMD FX-8350
✔Intel Core i5-7400
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
4. Version SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5. Has F16C
✔AMD FX-8350
✔Intel Core i5-7400
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.
6.bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-7400)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
7. Has MMX
✔AMD FX-8350
✔Intel Core i5-7400
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
8. TrustZone enabled
✖AMD FX-8350
✖Intel Core i5-7400
Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and video streaming through Digital Rights Management (DRM) ).
9.interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-7400)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which CPUs are better?
Comparison of AMD FX-8300 and Intel Core i5-3470
Comparative analysis of AMD FX-8300 and Intel Core i5-3470 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphical Interfaces, Security and Reliability.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).
AMD FX-8300
versus
Intel Core i5-3470
Advantages
reasons to select AMD FX-8300
- The Release Details 5 Month (S)
- The processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows you to easily make an airplane
- 4 more threads: 8 vs 4
- About 17% more clock speed: 4.2 GHz vs 3.60 GHz
- About 5% more maximum core temperature: 70.50°C vs 67.4°C
- About 50% more L1 cache, which means more data can be stored in it for
- L2 cache is 8 times larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- L3 cache is about 33% larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- Performance in PassMark benchmark — CPU mark about 13% more: 5293 vs 4670
- 2x more performance in CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) benchmark: 8.817 vs 3.217
- 2x performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) benchmark (a) more: 19.41 vs 9.637
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) about 1% more: 0.397 vs 0.393
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) about 11% more: 5.999 vs 5.424
. 4 more cores, the ability to run more applications simultaneously: 8 vs 4
Release date | October 2012 vs 8 April 2012 |
Unlocked | Unlocked / Locked |
Number of cores | 8 vs 4 |
Number of threads | 8 vs 4 |
Maximum frequency | 4.2 GHz vs 3.60 GHz |
Maximum core temperature | 70. 50°C vs 67.4°C |
Level 1 cache | 384 KB vs 64 KB (per core) |
Level 2 cache | 8 MB vs 1024 KB |
Level 3 cache | 8 MB vs 6144 KB |
PassMark — CPU mark | 5293 vs 4670 |
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 2697 vs 2691 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.817 vs 3.217 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 19.41 vs 9.637 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.397 vs 0.393 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.999 vs 5.424 |
Reasons to choose Intel Core i5-3470
- Newer process technology to make the processor more powerful but with lower power consumption: 22 nm vs 32 nm SOI
- About 23% less power consumption: 77 Watt vs 95 Watt
- PassMark — Single thread mark about 30% better performance: 1942 vs 1491
- Geekbench 4 — Single Core about 42% better performance: 734 vs 518
- Geekbench 4 — Multi-benchmark Core about 3% more: 2396 vs 2318
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) about 83% more: 1.821 vs 0.995
Technological process | 22 nm vs 32 nm SOI |
Power consumption (TDP) | 77 Watt vs 95 Watt |
PassMark — Single thread mark | 1942 vs 1491 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 734 vs 518 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 2396 vs 2318 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.821 vs 0.995 |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: AMD FX-8300
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-3470
PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|||
PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|||
Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|||
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|||
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score |
|
|||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
Name | AMD FX-8300 | Intel Core i5-3470 |
---|---|---|
PassMark — Single thread mark | 1491 | 1942 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 5293 | 4670 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 518 | 734 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 2318 | 2396 |
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 2697 | 2691 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.817 | 3.217 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 19.41 | 9.637 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.397 | 0.393 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.995 | 1.821 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.999 | 5.424 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 1515 | |
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 1515 |
Feature comparison
AMD FX-8300 | Intel Core i5-3470 | |
---|---|---|
Architecture name | Vishera | Ivy Bridge |
Family | AMD FX-Series Processors | |
Issue date | October 2012 | April 8, 2012 |
OPN PIB | FD8300WMHKBOX | |
OPN Tray | FD8300WMW8KHK | |
Place in the rating | 1844 | 1779 |
Price now | $80. 59 | $112.06 |
Series | AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 21.28 | 17.60 |
Applicability | Desktop | Desktop |
Price at first issue date | $184 | |
Processor Number | i5-3470 | |
Status | Discontinued | |
Support 64 bit | ||
Base frequency | 3. 3 GHz | 3.20 GHz |
Crystal area | 315 mm | 132.8 mm |
Level 1 cache | 384KB | 64 KB (per core) |
Level 2 cache | 8MB | 1024KB |
Level 3 cache | 8MB | 6144KB |
Process | 32nm SOI | 22 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 70.50°C | 67.4°C |
Maximum frequency | 4. 2 GHz | 3.60 GHz |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Number of threads | 8 | 4 |
Voltage P0 Vcore | Min: 1.075V — Max: 1.2875V | |
Number of transistors | 1200 million | |
Unlocked | ||
Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 67 °C | |
Supported memory frequency | 1866MHz | |
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 1333/1600 |
Maximum number of memory channels | 2 | |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25. 6 GB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 32GB | |
Maximum number of processors in | 1 | 1 |
Supported sockets | AM3+ | FCLGA1155 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 77 Watt |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
Thermal Solution | 2011D | |
PCI Express revision | n/a | 3. 0 |
PCIe configurations | up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8 & 2×4 | |
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | ||
Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
Idle States | ||
Extended instructions | Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX | |
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology | ||
Intel® TSX-NI | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Device ID | 0x152 | |
Graphics base frequency | 650MHz | |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.
|