Intel — Pentium — 120 MHz — chipdb.org
Intel — Pentium — 120 MHz — chipdb.org
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
de
Powered by 4images 1.7.10
Copyright © 2002-2022 4homepages.
de
Intel Mobile Pentium 120 — A80502120-WWW.NBCPU.COM
We specialized in CPU trade, contact us if you need bulk sale or purchase this kind of CPU,please do not hesitate to contact us :
Email :[email protected],Tel: +86 0755-82928539
| Type:CPU | Manufacturer:Intel |
| family:Mobile Pentium | microprocessors:Intel Mobile Pentium 120 — A80502120 |
| Type | CPU / Microprocessor | ||||||||||||||||||
| Market segment | Mobile | ||||||||||||||||||
| Family | Intel Mobile Pentium | ||||||||||||||||||
| CPU part number |
|
||||||||||||||||||
| Frequency | 120 MHz | ||||||||||||||||||
| Bus speed | 60 MHz | ||||||||||||||||||
| Clock multiplier | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Package | 296-pin Ceramic Staggered Pin Grid Array (SPGA) 1.  95″ x 1.95″ (4.95 cm x 4.95 cm) |
||||||||||||||||||
| Sockets | Socket 5 Socket 7 |
||||||||||||||||||
| ICOMP 2 index | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Upgrade options | Not supported | ||||||||||||||||||
| S-spec numbers | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| Architecture / Microarchitecture | |||||||||||||||||||
| Microarchitecture | P5 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Core steppings | mcB1 (Q0808, SX999) mcC0 (Q0880, SY027, SY030) |
||||||||||||||||||
| CPUIDs | 52B (Q0808, SX999) 52C (Q0880, SY027, SY030) |
||||||||||||||||||
| Manufacturing process | 0. 35 micron low-voltage BiCMOS silicon technology3.3 million transistors |
||||||||||||||||||
| Data width | 32 bit | ||||||||||||||||||
| Data bus width | 64 bit | ||||||||||||||||||
| Floating Point Unit | Integrated | ||||||||||||||||||
| Level 1 cache size | 8 KB 2-way set associative code cache 8 KB 2-way set associative write-back data cache |
||||||||||||||||||
| Multiprocessing | Not supported | ||||||||||||||||||
| Low power features |
|
||||||||||||||||||
| On-chip peripherals | Memory Management Unit | ||||||||||||||||||
| Electrical / Thermal parameters | |||||||||||||||||||
| Min/Recommended/Max V core | 2.735V / 2.9V / 3.065V 3.  1V3.3V |
||||||||||||||||||
| Min/Recommended/Max V I/O or secondary | 3.135V / 3.3V / 3.465V | ||||||||||||||||||
| Minimum/Maximum operating temperature | 0°C — 85°C | ||||||||||||||||||
| Minimum/Typical/Maximum power dissipation | 1.2 Watt (Stop Grant mode) / 2.5 Watt — 3.5 Watt / 8.77 Watt | ||||||||||||||||||
| Thermal Design Power | 7.1 Watt | ||||||||||||||||||
| Notes on Intel Mobile Pentium 120 MHz | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Intel Mobile Pentium 120 — A80502120microprocessors pictures
other microprocessors
|
Intel Mobile Pentium 120 — TT80502120 (PP120) |
Intel Mobile Pentium 133 — A80502133 |
|
Intel Mobile Pentium 133 — TT80502133 (PP133) |
Intel Mobile Pentium 150 — A80502150 |
|
Intel Mobile Pentium 150 — TT80502150 (PP150) |
Intel Mobile Pentium 4 2.  3 GHz — RK80532GC052512 |
|
Intel Mobile Pentium 4 2.4 GHz — RK80532GE056512 |
Intel Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 GHz — RK80532GE067512 |
|
Intel Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 GHz — RK80532HE067512 |
Intel Mobile Pentium 4 2.8 GHz — RK80532GE072512 |
|
Intel Mobile Pentium 4 2.8 GHz — RK80532HE072512 |
Intel Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 GHz — RK80532GE083512 |
Tel:+86 0755-83247530 Email:[email protected]
NBCPU All rights reserved..
Intel Pentium G620 and G850 processors for LGA1155
Sandy Bridge for economical
As promised earlier, Intel continues to expand processors based on the Sandy Bridge architecture, mastering more and more new market segments in accordance with the schedule. In particular, on May 22 (despite the Sunday :)) eight more new processors were released. Two of them (Core i3-2105 and i5-2405S) repeat the earlier ones (i3-2100 and i5-2400S) in their characteristics, except that they contain GMA HD 3000 graphics instead of HD 2000.
Significant event — earlier « the older «GPU was present only in the mobile segment, and in two expensive representatives of the desktop (i5-2500K and i7-2600K), so it deserves a separate discussion. The Core i5-2310 processor, on the contrary, is not of interest — it’s just a modification of the Core i5-2300 accelerated by 100 MHz, sold at the same price as its predecessor. But the rest of the models will be the topic of today’s article.
Why are they interesting? All four belong to the Pentium budget line. Once this trademark showed that we are talking about the fastest Intel processors, but now the situation has changed to almost the opposite — processors with a wholesale price of less than $100 are produced under it. Below that are the Celerons, which cost less than $60 but will have to wait until the next quarter for updates. And Pentium — here they are. Why is it important? Because in this segment, until recently, Intel colors actually protected only long-obsolete models for the LGA775 platform.
Under LGA1156, however, a couple of Pentium models were also released, but they did not have a significant impact on the market: they are expensive (87 for G6950 and 89 for the G6960 dollars in bulk), performance is only at the level of cheaper E-family models, and the platform that has not become popular … In general, this page of history should be turned over by skipping a generation in this price segment 🙂
What’s in new generation? The top is the G800 family (please note: if the various Core model numbers have changed from three-digit ones to four-digit ones, then everything is the opposite here), consisting of two models. G850 runs at 2.9GHz, contains 3 MB of L3 cache and GMA HD 2000 video core, supports DDR3-1333 and costs $86. The G840 differs from it only at 2.8 GHz (even if you don’t remember the days of Pentium 4/D, this is the fourth Pentium with such a clock speed) and the price is $75. It’s also $11 cheaper than the 2.6GHz G620. How is the G600 different from the G800? Only one — for the youngest of the modern Pentium line, the company limited memory support to only DDR3-1066 (as in the G6000 for LGA1156).
The positioning of these families is the most direct: G800 replaces E6000 (FSB frequency 1066 MHz), and G600 replaces E5000 (800 MHz). And similarly to these families, but unlike the G6000, all processors fit into a 65 W thermal package. Despite the presence of an integrated video core, i.e. the entire processor-chipset system fits into 70 W, and for the LGA775 the official value was closer to 100 W. If you need even less, the company also offers a Pentium G620T with a TDP of 35W. Yes, of course, just two cores without Hyper-Threading support at 2.2 GHz will make it much slower than the top Core i5-239 in this class0T, but it is the cheapest of the «cold» ones — some $ 70 in bulk (2390T, we recall, in large quantities it costs all 195).
In general, already quite curious. Moreover, a noticeable lag behind other processors based on Sandy Bridge DC in terms of clock frequency (Core i3-2100 is already 3.1 GHz) allows us to hope that faster representatives of both the G800 and G600 families will appear in the future with the same wholesale prices.
And the first acceleration will certainly be made no later than the appearance of the Celeron G500, which will make the new Pentiums more attractive than they are today. And how much they can be considered as such today, we will check in practice.
—
,
2 3
6
Testing
The performance testing methodology (list of software used and testing conditions) is described in detail in a separate article. For ease of perception, the results on the diagrams are presented in percentages (the result of AMD Athlon II X4 620 is taken as 100% in each of the tests).
Detailed results in absolute terms are available as a spreadsheet in Microsoft Excel format.
3D visualization
This group of tests has always gravitated towards high-frequency dual-core processors with large capacity fast cache memory. The release of models on Sandy Bridge showed that the frequency for the programs included in the group is not an end in itself, so you can limit yourself to less, but with greater efficiency. And the new Pentiums successfully confirmed this, taking the second and third places. In general, in the case of the G620, we shouldn’t talk about competition with the E5000, since, as we can see, there are tasks where it is even faster than the E6800, whose frequency is a quarter higher. And the G850 falls just a little short of the Core i3-2100. Thus, the use of budget models for interactive work with professional programs is more than justified.
3D rendering
But the real shock for us was that they are not so bad for the final rendering 🙂 Yes, of course, we hope that in these applications, which perfectly use multithreading, «simple» dual-core processors will be able to compete on equal terms with three- and four-core processors, or at least with models with support for Hyper-Threading, it would be reckless, however .
.. However, Phenom II X3 720 and Core i3-530 in this group received 91 points, and Core 2 Quad Q8200, despite four (!) cores, could boast only 94 points. And against this background of 83 points Pentium G850 can not be considered a bad result. It’s a pity that we haven’t tested any of the first Phenom X4s using this version of the methodology — it may very well be that after that the question is: «Which is better — a fast dual-core or a slow quad-core?» — would suddenly cease to seem simple and unambiguous 🙂
Although it’s clear that it’s still not worth seriously considering new Pentiums as potential render processors, but only because multi-core processors have seriously fallen in price lately. Particularly thanks to the efforts of AMD, which offers the Athlon II X3 at extremely aggressive prices. However, as we can see, the dual-core Athlon II X2 has nothing to catch here. They easily and effortlessly competed with the Pentium E6000 and G6000, but the expected Athlon II X2 275 will not be able to keep up even with the cheap Pentium G620, and the G800 is not worth mentioning.
Scientific and engineering calculations
Only one test can boast of multithreading support, and not bad, but one is not a warrior in the field. Thus, we get something similar to the first diagram — all the prizes went to Sandy Bridge. This time, the G620, however, only slightly outperformed its competitors, but, most importantly, it outperformed. And overtook everyone. Although its direct competitor according to Intel was not among the participants 😉
Graphic editors
And here discoveries have already begun. First of all — ACDSee, or rather its RAW Plugin, which is not only single-threaded, but generally does not differ in any «advanced» optimization, preferring Intel processors with the highest possible clock speed. In other applications, there were no surprises, but the effect of the only one turned out to be enough to push the G620 back to fifth place. But we won’t criticize him much for this — the leading four are more expensive, and sometimes noticeably 🙂 The G620, with its two low-frequency cores, is only 5% behind the Phenom II X4 840 and a little ahead of the Athlon II X3 455.
In general, the number of cores does not determine everything, even where they can all be used. And where it is impossible — even more so 🙂
Archivers
A slightly more complicated case: one test out of three is radically multi-threaded, one is no less radically single-threaded, but everyone loves the cache and the speed of working with RAM 🙂 In general, the G620 again failed to impress us with its performance, although Athlon II X2 265, as well as the Pentium G6960, he overtook more than convincingly. And the G850 once again took second place without much tension.
Compilation
Once again we are convinced that even the G620, which is much cheaper, is more than enough to replace the Pentium G6000. Moreover, the price issue also allows you to condescendingly look at its lag behind the E6800: as we have already said, the processor is supposed to compete with the cheaper and slower E5000, so some 5% lag pales against the background of a 33% difference in price.
But the G850 costs the same as the E6800, but it works faster. Moreover, once again, we note that this is despite the fact that the clock frequency of this pair is lower than that of all the other processors presented in the diagram that exceed 3 GHz (with the exception of the G6960, but it is an obvious outsider) — the effectiveness of the new architecture is really very high. But, of course, it is not large enough to be compared with multi-threaded processors: two cores without Hyper-Threading are two cores. Accordingly, the manufacturer can only take comfort in the fact that its «two cores» are now the fastest (and the expected appearance of Athlon II X2 275 will not change anything) in this task. Assuming, of course, that Intel needs consolation 🙂
Java
In this test, multithreading is also used very well, but not only it, so once again we state the fact that the Pentium G620 is inferior only to the models of the G800 line and outperforms all other current «ordinary» dual cores.
Although here Athlon II X2 is able to win back with an increase in the clock frequency, but it is not destined to catch up with the G850.
Internet browsers
The traditionally strong positions of high-frequency AMD processors and the almost complete disregard for the charms of improvements in Sandy Bridge lead to one of the few losses of the new Pentium. Let it be nominal (someone is not enough to view pages on the Internet Athlon II X4 620, the performance of which, we recall, is taken as 100 points?), But I will lose. Although extremely insignificant for the G850, the G620 looks normal if we compare it only with the predecessors of the Pentium line, but not AMD products.
Audio encoding
Another task where dual-core processors simply have nothing to catch, and the code of the audio decoders is so primitive that, other things being equal, everything is decided by the frequency. More precisely, almost everything — the new Pentiums have higher efficiency per gigahertz, but only by 10 percent, which is somewhat insufficient even to unconditionally outperform their predecessors.
However, this group of tests does not apply well to AMD processors, so at least Athlon II X2 can be dealt with easily.
Video encoding
The objective preferences of these programs are the same, but there are no subjective ones, which just makes AMD products look good. So good that earlier older Athlon II X2 outperformed any Pentium. But now everything has returned to the normal state of affairs — they can compete only with the younger Pentium G600. And the older G850, even though it lags behind modern multi-core models, but … Recall that 100 points in this test are Athlon II X4 620 and Core 2 Quad Q8200. A 96 points scored by the new «oldest of the youngest» is only 5% less. Moreover, it can be argued that this is a little more than Phenom X4 9850 would have received in this test: the oldest of the first generation of AMD quad-core processors. In general, as in rendering, we get a curious effect: modern «fast» dual-core processors are able to demonstrate results at the level of old «slow» quad-core ones.
However, it does not contradict the theory, but somehow it becomes a shame for those who bought the same Phenom X4 or the younger Core 2 Quad «for the future» — in the future, indeed, multi-core software began to be used more fully than four or five years ago, however, this does not make it easier for the “old people”: their already more primitive state employees begin to catch up even in such uncomfortable conditions for themselves.
Games
But for most games, multithreading was somehow not required until recently, and even now it is needed only occasionally. And the fact that the older Athlon II X3 overtook both Pentiums in the tests according to our methodology was largely due to the fact that we collected almost all the games (from those suitable for organizing testing, of course) that are really capable of using more than two cores, and even added a chess benchmark to this pile. After that, it turned out to be a bit of a shock for us that Pentium for LGA1155 performed very well under such conditions.
Let’s explain with an example. We have two games that generally «behave badly» on dual-core processors: GTA IV and World in Conflict. If we take the Athlon II X4 620 as a starting point (as is done in the tests according to this version of the method), then the performance of the Pentium E6800 in both is about 3/4 of the standard, and the Athlon II X2 265 provides 4/5 of the standard. At the same time, Athlon II X3 455 is capable of 115% in the first and 100% in the second game. That is, it would seem that everything is clear — for such games you need at least a high-frequency triple-core. And it was like that before. However, today the Pentium G620 «shot back» at 91/95%, and the G850 gave out 105/100%, i.e. just at the level of that same high-frequency tri-core processor and faster than the reference processor with four cores.
Total
Testing top processors is usually boring because of its predictability, but interesting because of absolute records. With budget processors, everything is strictly the opposite: it makes no sense to expect high absolute results from them (because all this is to some extent a cropped «middle class»).
But the diversity of competitors in this market segment is great, so it’s always interesting to see how new solutions compare with existing ones. What can be said about the new Pentium?
To begin with, not much was expected of them. Moreover, dual-core processors without any multithreading enhancement technologies and with relatively low clock speeds, according to some users, should have been relatively slow devices in general. And Intel itself didn’t even hint at any outstanding performance: the G600 line, we recall, is positioned in the same way as the Pentium E5000, and the G800 — like the Pentium E6000/G6000. The reality somewhat exceeded expectations. Already the youngest G620 turned out to be one of the fastest dual-core processors on the market — even it is quite enough both to eliminate all the old Pentiums and to fully compete with the Athlon II X2 (including the price). And it’s okay that the cost of the latest processor is slightly lower — unlike the Pentium, it is not equipped with graphics and PCIe, so it requires more complex and expensive chipsets.
Well, since there is no competition in the chipset market now, Intel may well set a lower price for processors (and this is what many users pay attention to first of all), compensating for lost profits with the help of support chips.
As for the G840/G850, they are even faster, so there are simply no competitors among «honest» dual-core models. And the only thing that can overshadow their triumph is the availability of tri-core processors of the Athlon II X3 line in the same price segment. However, this state of affairs did not happen yesterday, however, over the past year and a half since the announcement, three-core processors have not managed to “defeat everyone”. There are several reasons for this. Firstly, in a huge number of applications, these processors are no faster (or even slower) than older dual-core processors. Secondly, users who really need a lot of computation threads most often consider it quite reasonable not to «squeeze» a hundred dollars, but to find funds for a quad-core processor, even if it is younger — the effect of the latter is greater 🙂 Thirdly, which is important , AMD itself doesn’t want to «overdo it» with the promotion of these models, since they are made on the basis of the same Propus chip, also used in Athlon II X4, i.
e. the cost of processors of these lines is almost the same, but the uncut version can be sold a little more expensive. So it turns out that with all its advantages, the Athlon II X3 existed on the market “in balance” with the Pentium and Athlon II X2, even though in some cases it looked like a more interesting purchase than some Core i3-500 . Well, now Intel Pentiums have become faster and cheaper, which further reduces the attractiveness of tri-cores in the mass market and forces AMD to sell expensive chips cheaply. And Intel sells cheap cheap ones, which I think the company really likes 🙂
In addition, it seems to us that the Blues have not yet played all their cards in the public sector. In essence, modern Pentiums are somewhat similar to the Celeron 400. Both of them are special budget solutions based on the new architecture, “for the sake of order” cut down to the state of old processors of the same price class, which consisted in disabling the second core in Celeron and Hyper-Threading blocking in the Pentium G.
Both, respectively, can be improved in terms of increasing the number of computational threads, which was done with Celeron. And Pentium… here, of course, we are already entering the realm of conjectures and assumptions, but there are quite a lot of facts that testify in favor of the version that Pentium will soon gain NT support.
First, note the gaps in the model numbers — Intel carefully avoids using the G700 marking (why the gap in numbers between two close Pentium families looks somewhat strange) and 2200 (all Core i3 are 21xx, and all Core i5 are like at least 2300). In addition, the use of a “full-sized” SBDC chip for the Core i3 with cutting half of the graphics pipelines is also somewhat surprising, although the company already has an initially simplified version. What for? And, for example, in order to eventually give all Core i3 the GMA HD 3000 video core (which is now only available in the recently released Core i3-2105) and an extra megabyte of cache memory, calling it the Core i3-2200 line.
Processors equivalent to the current Core i3-2100 and 2120 in terms of technical characteristics may well become Pentium G900. And the Pentium G700 is an analogue of the G600, but with HT.
Of course, such improvements will look most logical after the release of Ivy Bridge, but they are quite possible within the same technological process: we remember very well how Celeron from single-core became dual-core within 65 nm, and Pentium at 45 nm “suddenly” acquired support for FSB 1066 MHz (which before that was the prerogative of only Core 2 Duo, and even then not all). The same can happen with Hyper-Threading, but everything will depend on how soon and successfully AMD Llano manages to enter the market. If the company succeeds, then competition will intensify, so Intel will have to take retaliatory steps. If not, then until next year you can not rush. Because, as we can see, already released Pentiums for LGA1155 turned out to be very successful. So much so that the production and sales of previous members of the family for other constructs can be painlessly curtailed, leaving only Celeron for the LGA775.
And even then — not for long 🙂
We thank the Russian representative office of the company Gigabyte ,
as well as the companies «F-Center» and Crucial
for their help in completing the test benches.
Intel Core i7-4770K vs Intel Pentium G4560: What is the difference?
smartphonesgraphic cardswireless headphones CPU
49points
Intel Core i7-4770K
46points
Intel Pentium G4560
Comparison Winner
vs
63 facts in comparison
Intel Core i7-4770K
Intel Pentium G4560
Why is Intel Core i7-4770K better than Intel Pentium G4560?
- 2x higher CPU speed?
4 x 3.5GHz vs 2 x 3.5GHz - 4 more CPU threads?
8 vs 4 - 0.5MB more L2 cache?
1MB vs 0.5MB - 1.99x higher PassMark score?
7042 vs 3531 - 5MB more L3 cache?
8MB vs 3MB - 128KB more L1 cache?
256KB vs 128KB - Has an unlocked multiplier?
- 0.
5MB/core more L3 cache per core?
2MB/core vs 1.5MB/core
Why is Intel Pentium G4560 better than Intel Core i7-4770K?
- 800MHz higher RAM speed?
2400MHz vs 1600MHz - Are 8nm semiconductors smaller?
14nm vs 22nm - 30W below TDP?
54W vs 84W - 12.8GB/s more memory bandwidth?
38.4GB/s vs 25.6GB/s - 0.9 newer version of DirectX?
12 vs 11.1 - 32GB more max memory?
64GB vs 32GB - 0.4 newer version of OpenGL?
4.4 vs 4 - 3GT/s higher data rate?
8GT/s vs 5GT/s
Which comparisons are the most popular?
Intel Core i7-4770K
vs
Intel Core i7-4790K
Intel Pentium G4560
vs
Intel Core i7-7500U
Intel Core i7-4770K
vs
AMD A10-7850K
Intel Pentium G4560
VS
Intel Core i5-7400
Intel Core i7-4770K
VS
Intel Core i7-4770
Intel Pentium G4560 VS
INTEL COREE I3-7100 9000 INTEL INTEL INTEL INTEL INTEL INTEL INTEL INTEL INTEL
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
Intel Pentium G4560
vs
Intel Core i3-6100
Intel Core i7-4770K
vs
Intel Core i5-11400H
Intel Pentium G4560
vs
Intel Celeron N3350
Intel Core i7-4770K
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Intel Pentium G4560
vs
Intel Core i5-3470
Intel Core i7-4770K
vs
Intel Core i7-4770s
Intel Pentium G4560
VS
AMD RYZEN 3 1200
Intel Core i7-4770K
VS
AMD RYZEN 3 2200G
INTEL Pentium G4560 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS0003
Intel Core i7-4770K
vs
Intel Core i5-4690K
Intel Pentium G4560
vs
Intel Core i5-6500
Intel Core i7-4770K
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
Intel Pentium G4560
vs
AMD A8-7600
Price Comparison
User Reviews
Overall Rating
Intel Core i7-4770K
0 User Reviews
03
0.
0 /10
0 reviews of users
Intel Pentium G4560
3 Reviews of Users
Intel Pentium G4560
9000 No reviews yet
7.7 /10
3 votes0003
3 Votes
performance
reviews not yet
7.0517 /10
3 VOTES
Reliability
reviews yet not
/10
3 VOTES
9000
No reviews yet
10.0 /10
3 votes
Performance
CPU speed
4 x 3.5GHz
2 x 3.5GHz
CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second the processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
turbo clock speed
3.
9GHz
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium G4560)
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
Has an unlocked multiplier
✔Intel Core i7-4770K
✖Intel Pentium G4560
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and can be easily overclocked for better performance in games and other applications.
L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L2 core
0.25MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
L3 core
2MB/core
1.5MB/core
More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Geotagging
PassMark result
This benchmark measures CPU performance using multithreading.
PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium G4560)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium G4560)
Cinebench R20 is a test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown.
Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium G4560)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium G4560)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
Blender test result (bmw27)
440.7seconds
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium G4560)
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
result Blender (classroom)
1376.9seconds
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium G4560)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
performance per watt
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium G4560)
This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Integrated graphics
GPU clock speed
350MHz
350MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
turbo GPU
1250MHz
1050MHz
When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
GPU Execution Units
A Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) with more execution units can provide better graphics.
Monitor support
By using multiple displays, you can increase your workspace, making it easier to work across multiple applications.
version of DirectX
DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.
OpenGL version
The newer the OpenGL version, the better graphics quality in games.
version of OpenCL
Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.
texture units (TMUs)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4770K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium G4560)
TMUs take texture units and map them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.
imaging units ROPs
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4770K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium G4560)
ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.
Memory
RAM speed
1600MHz
2400MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
maximum memory bandwidth
25.6GB/s
38.4GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
DDR memory version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium G4560)
DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of main memory. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
maximum memory
Maximum memory (RAM).
bus baud rate
A bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
Supports memory troubleshooting code
✖Intel Core i7-4770K
✖Intel Pentium G4560
Memory troubleshooting code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4770K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium G4560)
A newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4770K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium G4560)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Functions
uses multithreading
or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) delivers faster performance by dividing each physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads.
Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
Has AES
✔Intel Core i7-4770K
✔Intel Pentium G4560
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
Has AVX
✔Intel Core i7-4770K
✖Intel Pentium G4560
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
version of SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
Has F16C
✔Intel Core i7-4770K
✖Intel Pentium G4560
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown.