AMD Opteron 6276 vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600: What is the difference?
35points
AMD Opteron 6276
68points
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Comparison winner
vs
64 facts in comparison
AMD Opteron 6276
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Why is AMD Opteron 6276 better than AMD Ryzen 5 3600?
- 4 more CPU threads?
16vs12 - 1.7x faster CPU speed?
16 x 2.3GHzvs6 x 3.6GHz - Supports ECC memory?
- 384KB bigger L1 cache?
768KBvs384KB - 13MB bigger L2 cache?
16MBvs3MB - 0.5MB/core more L2 cache per core?
1MB/corevs0.5MB/core - Has FMA4?
Why is AMD Ryzen 5 3600 better than AMD Opteron 6276?
- 50W lower TDP?
65Wvs115W - 16MB bigger L3 cache?
32MBvs16MB - Has an unlocked multiplier?
- 25nm smaller semiconductor size?
7nmvs32nm - 26°C higher maximum operating temperature?
95°Cvs69°C - 1GHz higher turbo clock speed?
4.2GHzvs3.2GHz
- 1600MHz higher ram speed?
3200MHzvs1600MHz - Uses multithreading?
Which are the most popular comparisons?
AMD Opteron 6276
vs
AMD Opteron 6172
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 4500
AMD Opteron 6276
vs
AMD Opteron 6380
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5500
AMD Opteron 6276
vs
Intel Xeon E5-2620
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
AMD Opteron 6276
vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6148
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs
Intel Core i5-10400
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs
Intel Core i3-12100
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs
Intel Core i5-9400F
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 4650G
Price comparison
Cheap alternatives
User reviews
Overall Rating
AMD Opteron 6276
0 User reviews
AMD Opteron 6276
0.
0/10
0 User reviews
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
8 User reviews
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
9.4/10
8 User reviews
Features
Value for money
No reviews yet
9.3/10
8 votes
Performance
No reviews yet
9.1/10
8 votes
Reliability
No reviews yet
9.5/10
8 votes
Energy efficiency
No reviews yet
9.6/10
7 votes
Performance
CPU speed
16 x 2.3GHz
6 x 3.6GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
turbo clock speed
3.2GHz
4.2GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
L3 cache
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
L2 core
1MB/core
0.5MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
clock multiplier
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6276)
The clock multiplier controls the speed of the CPU.
Has an unlocked multiplier
✖AMD Opteron 6276
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
Memory
Supports ECC memory
✔AMD Opteron 6276
✖AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
maximum memory bandwidth
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6276)
47.68GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
DDR memory version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6276)
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
maximum memory amount
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6276)
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
RAM speed
1600MHz
3200MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
memory channels
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6276)
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
bus speed
3.2GHz
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
bus transfer rate
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6276)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6276)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device.
For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
Features
uses multithreading
✖AMD Opteron 6276
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
Has AES
✔AMD Opteron 6276
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
Has AVX
✔AMD Opteron 6276
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6276)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6276)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Has F16C
✖AMD Opteron 6276
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
Has FMA3
✖AMD Opteron 6276
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
FMA3 is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
Has FMA4
✔AMD Opteron 6276
✖AMD Ryzen 5 3600
FMA4 is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
Benchmarks
Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6276)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
Cinebench R20 (single) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6276)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6276)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)
Geekbench 5 result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6276)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)
PassMark result
Unknown.
Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6276)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
PassMark result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6276)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
performance per watt
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6276)
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Blender (bmw27) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6276)
235seconds
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6276)
705.
9seconds
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
Miscellaneous
CPU socket
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6276)
The CPU socket/s supported.
Type
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6276)
Desktop
The market that the CPU is designed for.
Chipset
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6276)
X570, B550, A520, X470, B450
The motherboard chipset/s supported.
Price comparison
Which are the best Enterprise CPUs?
AMD Opteron 6272 vs AMD Ryzen 3 2200G: What is the difference?
33points
AMD Opteron 6272
60points
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Comparison winner
vs
65 facts in comparison
AMD Opteron 6272
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Why is AMD Opteron 6272 better than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G?
- 12 more CPU threads?
16vs4 - 2.
4x faster CPU speed?
16 x 2.1GHzvs4 x 3.5GHz - 12MB bigger L3 cache?
16MBvs4MB - 384KB bigger L1 cache?
768KBvs384KB - 14MB bigger L2 cache?
16MBvs2MB - 0.5MB/core more L2 cache per core?
1MB/corevs0.5MB/core
Why is AMD Ryzen 3 2200G better than AMD Opteron 6272?
- Has integrated graphics?
- 50W lower TDP?
65Wvs115W - Has an unlocked multiplier?
- 26°C higher maximum operating temperature?
95°Cvs69°C - 0.7GHz higher turbo clock speed?
3.7GHzvs3GHz - 1393MHz higher ram speed?
2993MHzvs1600MHz - Has AVX?
- Has F16C?
Which are the most popular comparisons?
Intel Xeon Gold 6128
vs
Intel Xeon Silver 4110
Intel Xeon E5-2643
vs
Intel Xeon E5-2680
AMD Epyc 7282
vs
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4
AMD Epyc 7282
vs
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
AMD Epyc 72F3
vs
AMD Epyc 7F32
AMD Epyc 7742
vs
Intel Xeon Platinum 9282
AMD Epyc 9654
vs
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
AMD Epyc 9654
vs
Intel Xeon Platinum 9282
Intel Xeon D-1521
vs
Intel Xeon E-2136
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3
vs
Intel Xeon E3-1268L v3
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
AMD Opteron 6272
0 User reviews
AMD Opteron 6272
0.
0/10
0 User reviews
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
8 User reviews
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
8.3/10
8 User reviews
Features
Value for money
No reviews yet
9.3/10
8 votes
Performance
No reviews yet
7.4/10
8 votes
Reliability
No reviews yet
8.0/10
8 votes
Energy efficiency
No reviews yet
8.5/10
8 votes
Performance
CPU speed
16 x 2.1GHz
4 x 3.5GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
turbo clock speed
3.7GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
L3 cache
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
L2 core
1MB/core
0.5MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
clock multiplier
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6272)
The clock multiplier controls the speed of the CPU.
Has an unlocked multiplier
✖AMD Opteron 6272
✔AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
Memory
Supports ECC memory
✔AMD Opteron 6272
✔AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
maximum memory bandwidth
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6272)
43.7GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
DDR memory version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6272)
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
maximum memory amount
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6272)
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
RAM speed
1600MHz
2993MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
memory channels
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6272)
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
bus speed
3.2GHz
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 3 2200G)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
bus transfer rate
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6272)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 3 2200G)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6272)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 3 2200G)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device.
For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
Features
uses multithreading
✖AMD Opteron 6272
✖AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
Has AES
✔AMD Opteron 6272
✔AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
Has AVX
✖AMD Opteron 6272
✔AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6272)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 3 2200G)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6272)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 3 2200G)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Has F16C
✖AMD Opteron 6272
✔AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
Has FMA3
✖AMD Opteron 6272
✔AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
FMA3 is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
Has FMA4
✔AMD Opteron 6272
✔AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
FMA4 is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
Benchmarks
Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6272)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
Cinebench R20 (single) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6272)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6272)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)
Geekbench 5 result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6272)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)
PassMark result
Unknown.
Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6272)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
PassMark result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6272)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
performance per watt
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6272)
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Blender (bmw27) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6272)
680seconds
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6272)
2339.
7seconds
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
Miscellaneous
CPU socket
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6272)
The CPU socket/s supported.
Uses big.LITTLE technology
✖AMD Opteron 6272
✖AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Using big.LITTLE technology, a chip can switch between two sets of processor cores to maximize performance and battery life. For example, when playing a game the more powerful cores will be used to increase performance, whereas checking email will use the less powerful cores to maximize battery life.
Type
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Opteron 6272)
Desktop
The market that the CPU is designed for.
Chipset
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
(AMD Opteron 6272)
X470, B450, X370, B350, A320, X570
The motherboard chipset/s supported.
Price comparison
Which are the best Enterprise CPUs?
Ryzen 5 1600 [in 20 benchmarks]
AMD
Ryzen 5 1600
- Interface
- Core frequency
- Video memory size
- Memory type
- Memory frequency
- Maximum resolution
Description
AMD started selling AMD Ryzen 5 1600 on April 11, 2017 at a suggested price of $219. This is a desktop processor based on the Zen architecture, primarily designed for office systems. It has 6 cores and 12 threads and is manufactured using 14nm process technology, the maximum frequency is 3600MHz, the multiplier is unlocked.
In terms of compatibility, this is an AMD Socket AM4 processor with a TDP of 65W. It supports DDR4 memory.
It provides poor benchmark performance at
9.
91%
from the leader, which is AMD EPYC 9654.
EPYC
9654
Compare
General information
Information about the type (desktop or laptop) and architecture of the Ryzen 5 1600, as well as the time when sales started and the cost at that time.
| Performance ranking | 640 | |||
| Release date | April 11, 2017 (5 years ago) |
|||
| Price | Price now | 172 $ (0.8x) | out of 25332 (Xeon Platinum 8276L) |
The price-quality
To obtain the costs and their costs and their costs and their costs other processors.
- 0
- 50
- 100
Features
Ryzen 5 1600 quantitative parameters such as number of cores and threads, clock speeds, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock status. They indirectly speak about the performance of the processor, but for an accurate assessment, you need to consider the results of the tests.
| of 1536 (EPYC Embeded 3401) | |||
| CASH 2nd level | 512K | 16 MB (total) | of 32 (Ryzen Threadripper 1998) |
| Technological process | 14 Nm | of 4 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) |
Compatible
Information on Ryzen 5 1600 compatibility with other computer components. Useful, for example, when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one.
Please note that the power consumption of some processors can significantly exceed their nominal TDP even without overclocking. Some may even double their claims if the motherboard allows you to adjust the power settings of the processor.
Memory support
Types, maximum size and channels of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1600. Higher memory frequencies may be supported depending on the motherboard.
| Memory types | DDR4 | of 5600 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) |
| 64 GB | of 786 (Xeon E5-2670 V3) | The number of memory channels | 2 | 9005 9 (XEON Platinum 9221) | 42.671 GB/s | of 281.6 (Xeon Platinum 9221) |
| ECC -memory support |
0021
General parameters of the integrated video card in the Ryzen 5 1600.
| Video core | — |
Peripherals
Ryzen 5 1600 supported peripherals and how to connect them.
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | of 5 (EPYC 9654) |
| PCI-Express 9 lanes0055 | 20 | of 128 (EPYC 7401) |
Benchmark tests
These are the results of the Ryzen 5 1600 performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest processor at the moment.
Overall benchmark performance
This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Ryzen 5 1600
9.91
- Passmark
- GeekBench 5 Single-Core
- GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
- Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
- Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
- 3DMark06 CPU
- Cinebench 11.
5 64-bit multi-core - Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
- Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
- Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
- TrueCrypt AES
- x264 encoding pass 2
- x264 encoding pass 1
- WinRAR 4.0
- Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core
- Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core
- Geekbench 2
- Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core
- Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widely used benchmark that consists of 8 different tests, including integer and floating point calculations, extended instruction tests, compression, encryption, and game physics calculations. Also includes a separate single-threaded test.
Benchmark coverage: 67%
Ryzen 5 1600
12296
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance.
This version uses only one processor core.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
Ryzen 5 1600
897
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance. This version uses all available processor cores.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
Ryzen 5 1600
4910
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is a very outdated ray tracing benchmark for processors developed by the authors of Cinema 4D — Maxon. The Single-Core version uses a single CPU thread to render a futuristic motorcycle model.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
Ryzen 5 1600
4538
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 that uses all processor threads. The possible number of threads in this version is limited to 16.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Ryzen 5 1600
25970
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is an outdated set of benchmarks based on DirectX 9 by Futuremark. Its processor part contains two tests, one of which calculates the pathfinding of game AI, the other emulates game physics using the PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Ryzen 5 1600
8244
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 that uses all processor threads. This version supports a maximum of 64 threads.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Ryzen 5 1600
13
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core (sometimes referred to as Multi-Thread) is a variant of Cinebench R15 that uses all of the processor threads.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Ryzen 5 1600
1129
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (Release 15) is a benchmark created by Maxon, the creator of the popular Cinema 4D 3D modeling package.
It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench using more modern variants of the Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes referred to as Single-Thread) uses only one CPU thread to render a room full of mirror balls and complexly shaped lights.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Ryzen 5 1600
147
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark developed by Maxon. authors of Cinema 4D. It has been superseded by later versions of Cinebench which use more modern variants of the Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads one CPU thread with ray tracing, rendering a glossy room full of crystal spheres and lights.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Ryzen 5 1600
1.7
TrueCrypt AES
TrueCrypt is a deprecated program that was widely used to encrypt disk partitions on the fly. It contains several built-in benchmarks, one of which is TrueCrypt AES.
It measures the speed of data encryption using the AES algorithm. The result of the test is the encryption speed in gigabytes per second.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
Ryzen 5 1600
6
x264 encoding pass 2
x264 Pass 2 is a slower MPEG4 x264 video compression benchmark, resulting in a variable bit rate output file. This results in a better quality of the resulting video file, as a higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. The benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
Ryzen 5 1600
69
x264 encoding pass 1
The x264 benchmark uses the MPEG 4 x264 compression method to encode the HD (720p) sample video. Pass 1 is a faster option that produces an output file at a constant bit rate. Its result is measured in frames per second, that is, how many frames of the source video file were encoded in one second on average.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
Ryzen 5 1600
177
WinRAR 4.
0
WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of the popular archiver. It contains an internal speed test using maximum compression by the RAR algorithm on large amounts of randomly generated data. Results are measured in kilobytes per second.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
Ryzen 5 1600
3430
Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core
Benchmark coverage: 6%
Ryzen 5 1600
19391
Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core
Benchmark coverage: 6%
Ryzen 5 1600
3189
Geekbench 2
Benchmark coverage: 5%
Ryzen 5 1600
16217
Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core
Benchmark coverage: 3%
Ryzen 5 1600
15096
Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core
Benchmark coverage: 3%
Ryzen 5 1600
3652
Relative capacity
Overall performance of the Ryzen 5 1600 compared to its closest competitor in desktop processors.
Intel Core i3-12100T
104.04
Intel Core i7-5960X
103.53
Intel Core i5-10505
100.5
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
100
Intel Core i5-10400
99.9
Intel Core i7-8700B
98.49
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
96.97
Competitor from Intel
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Ryzen 5 1600 from Intel is Core i5-10400, which is roughly equal in speed and lower by 1 position in our rating.
Core i5
10400
Compare
Here are a few of Intel’s closest competitors to the Ryzen 5 1600:
Intel Core i3-12100T
104.04
Intel Core i7-5960X
103.
53
Intel Core i5-10505
100.5
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
100
Intel Core i5-10400
99.9
Intel Core i7-8700B
98.49
Intel Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition
93.84
Other processors
Here we recommend several processors that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one.
Core i7
8700B
Compare
Core i7
5960X
Compare
Core i7
7800X
Compare
Core i7
10700T
Compare
Core i7
8700
Compare
Ryzen 5
1600X
Compare
Best graphics cards for Ryzen 5 1600
We have 23782 configs based on Ryzen 5 1600 in our database.
According to statistics, these cards are most often used with Ryzen 5 1600:
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
12.5%
Radeon RX
570
7.9%
Radeon RX
580
7.2%
GeForce GTX
1650
6.6%
GeForce GTX
1060 6GB
5.9%
GeForce GTX
1060 3GB
4.8%
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
3.5%
Radeon RX
550
3%
GeForce GTX
1660
2.
8%
GeForce GT
1030
2.8%
Here are the most powerful graphics cards used with Ryzen 5 1600 according to user statistics:
GeForce RTX
4090
0.1% (28/23782)
GeForce RTX
4080
0.008% (2/23782)
GeForce RTX
3090 Ti
0.2% (50/23782)
Radeon RX
6950XT
0.004% (1/23782)
Radeon RX
7900XT
0.008% (2/23782)
GeForce RTX
3080 Ti
0.2% (52/23782)
GeForce RTX
3090
0.
2% (59/23782)
Radeon RX
6900XT
0.08% (20/23782)
GeForce RTX
3080 12GB
0.008% (2/23782)
GeForce RTX
3080
0.08% (18/23782)
User rating
Here you can see the rating of the processor by users, as well as put your own rating.
Tips and comments
Here you can ask a question about the Ryzen 5 1600 processor, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
Comparison AMD Opteron 6128 vs AMD Phenom II X4 B550055
8 8 vs. 4 Comparison of instructions and technologies
| Technology or instruction name | AMD Opteron 6128 | AMD Phenom II X4 B55 | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cool’n’Quiet | — | Coolness and silence. |
|
| CoolCore Technology | — | Complements Cool’n’Quiet. Temporarily disable unused processor blocks. | |
| DDPM (Dual Dynamic Power Management) | — | Dual dynamic power management. |
| Technology or instruction name | AMD Opteron 6128 | AMD Phenom II X4 B55 | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMX (Multimedia Extensions) | Multimedia extensions. | ||
| SSE (Streaming SIMD Extensions) | Streaming SIMD processor extension. | ||
| SSE2 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 2) | Processor Streaming SIMD Extension 2. |
||
| SSE3 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 3) | Streaming SIMD Processor Extension 3. | ||
| SSE4A (Streaming SIMD Extensions 4A) | Processor 4A streaming SIMD extension. | ||
| AMD64 | 64-bit microprocessor architecture developed by AMD. | ||
| 3DNow! | Optional MMX extension for AMD processors. |
| Technology or instruction name | AMD Opteron 6128 | AMD Phenom II X4 B55 | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EVP (Enhanced Virus Protection) | Improved virus protection. |
| Technology or instruction name | AMD Opteron 6128 | AMD Phenom II X4 B55 | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD-V | AMD-V Virtualization Technology. |
Benchmarks
Overall performance rating
The rating is calculated according to an internal formula, taking into account all the data, such as — test results for all programs, number of cores, threads, overclocking technologies, year of release, instructions, socket, temperature data, clock frequency, structure, and other data. The results of the overall rating showed that the Opteron 6128 processor is not much superior to its rival Phenom II X4 B55. The Phenom II X4 B55 processor itself managed to score 2858.63 points, slightly losing to the competitor.
PassMark CPU Mark
This is perhaps the most common benchmark tester on the Internet.
The benchmark includes a large pool of tests to evaluate the performance of the PC, including the processor. Among them are compression, integer calculations, game physics calculations, encryption, floating point calculations, extended instruction checking, single-threaded and multi-threaded tests. It is also possible to compare the received data with other configurations in the database. Almost all CPUs presented on our site have been tested in PassMark. The Performance Test showed slightly better performance for the Opteron 6128 (2826 points) over the Phenom II X4 B55 (2366 points). The Phenom II X4 B55 falls short in this test.
Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Single threaded test
Released by MAXON, it is based on Cinema 4D 3d editor. This benchmark for testing video cards and processors is already very outdated in our time. It uses a method of geometric optics — ray tracing. The test is carried out in Windows, Mac OS X. There is a possibility to test multi-processor systems.
Single-Core in its work uses only one core and one thread for rendering. The main mode of passing performance tests is multilevel reflections, working with light, imitation of global illumination, spatial light sources, photorealistic rendering of a 3D scene, and procedural shaders.
Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Multi-threaded test
Multi Core is another test option in the Cinebench R10 benchmark, which already uses multi-threaded and multi-core testing method. Keep in mind that the possible number of threads in this version is limited to 16.
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test
Multi-threaded version of the CINEBENCH R11.5 benchmark — can load the processor at 100% using all cores and threads. Differs from previous versions, 64 threads are used here. Testing the Phenom II X4 B55 in the Cinebench 11.5 benchmark showed a result of 3.24 points, slightly ahead of its competitor. At this time, the Opteron 6128 gets its 3.1 points, which fully justifies their close positions in the rating.
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
Excellent multifunctional Cinebench version R11.5 from Maxon. His tests are still relevant. In this Single-Core variant, tests occur using one core and one thread. In checks, as before, the ray tracing process is used, rendering a high-polygonal three-dimensional space with a large number of crystalline and glass and translucent balls. The result of the test is the value «frames per second». The Phenom II X4 B55 single-thread test results in Cinebench 11.5 Single-Core showed high performance compared to the competitor, with a score of 0.67 points. But the Opteron 6128 itself, scoring 0.32 points in this test, is far behind it.
Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test
Multi Core version of Cinebench R15 — will load your assembly to the full, showing what it is capable of. It is ideal for modern multi-threaded CPUs from AMD and Intel. it is capable of using 256 computation threads. All CPU cores and threads are used when rendering high-poly 3D objects.
The Phenom II X4 B55, with a score of 286.41, doesn’t outperform the Cinebench r15 multi-thread benchmark. The Opteron 6128 is slightly behind with 272.28 points.
Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
Cinebench Release 15 is the most up-to-date benchmark from Finns from Maxon. A complex 3D scene is rendered with many objects, light sources and reflections. The whole system is tested: both processors and video cards. For processors, the result of the calculation will be the value of PTS points, and for video processors, the value of frames per second FPS. In the Single Core version of the program, only 1 thread is involved in rendering. The single-threaded test of the Phenom II X4 B55 processor in the Cinebench R15 program indicates its high performance, the result is 72.53 points. Compared to it, its Opteron 6128 competitor fails this test with a score of 34.81 points.
Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test
This is a 64-bit multi-threaded Geekbench 4 benchmark.
It is the cross-platform device and OS support that makes Geekbench tests the most common now. In Geekbench 4 64-bit multi-core, the Phenom II X4 B55 received a score of 6952, which is significantly higher than the Opteron 6128. In this test, the Opteron 6128 scores a very low score of 5507 compared to the Phenom II X4 B55.
Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Single thread test
The program, like its earlier versions, can be run on operating systems running Linux, Windows, Mac OS. The Single-Core version uses one thread. For the first time, Android and iOS smartphones are also supported in this version of the tester. The current single-threaded version of Geekbench 4 for testing desktop PCs and laptops. The Phenom II X4 B55 scored higher in the Geekbench 4.0 single-thread test with a score of 2281. But its competitor Opteron 6128 is doing much worse — 1302 points.
Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Multi-threaded test
The Multi Core version of Geekbench 3 — allows you to make a strong test of the «strength» of your build and demonstrate the stability of your system.
Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Single-threaded benchmark
Multi-platform Geekbench is usually used to test a Mac system, but it works on both Linux and Windows. The main purpose is to test the performance of processors. The 32-bit version of the program uses one processor core and one thread.
Geekbench 2
Today there are more recent updates, 5v and fourth. A very outdated version of the Geekbench 2 tester. On our website, there are up to two hundred CPU models that have test results in this program.
X264 HD 4.0 Pass 1
In essence, this is a practical test of processor performance by transcoding HD video files to the new H.264 format, the so-called MPEG 4 x264 codec. The number of frames processed per second is an indicator of the check. This test is faster compared to Pass 2 as it renders at a constant rate. An ideal benchmark for multi-core and multi-threaded CPUs. The MPEG 4 video processing speed of the Phenom II X4 B55 is slightly higher than that of the Opteron 6128, and amounted to 75.
8 FPS. The Opteron 6128 managed to score 72.67 FPS, slightly behind the first processor.
X264 HD 4.0 Pass 2
This is a slightly different compared to slower test based on video file compression. The same MPEG4 x264 codec is used, but the rendering is done at a variable rate. As a result, we get a higher quality video file. You need to be aware that a real task is being performed, and the x264 codec is used in a large number of video encoders. The final value is also measured in frames per second. Therefore, the test results realistically reflect the performance of the platform. During the encoding of the video file by the Phenom II X4 B55 processor into the mpeg4 format, a processing speed of 17.41 Frames / s was obtained. While the Opteron 6128 trailed slightly behind with 16.8 FPS.
3DMark06 CPU
CPUs are tested in two ways: the game AI does pathfinding, and the other test emulates the physics engine using PhysX. Benchmark program for evaluating the performance of the video system, and CPU.
Created using the DirectX 9.0 API by the Finnish team Futuremark. This benchmark is often used by overclockers and gamers and those who like to overclock the system. The Phenom II X4 B55 performed slightly faster in the gaming physics and pathfinding tests, scoring up to 4204.02 points. The Opteron 6128 also coped with these tasks, showing a good result of 4086.07 points.
3DMark Fire Strike Physics
We can say that about 2 hundred CPUs on our website have 3DMark Physics test data. It represents an arithmetic test that performs calculations in game physics.
WinRAR 4.0
A well-known data archiver. The compression speed of the RAR algorithm was checked, for these purposes huge amounts of random data were used. The resulting speed during compression «kilobytes per second» — this is the test indicator. The tests were done under the Windows operating system. Phenom II X4 B55 is slightly ahead of the competitor in WinRAR file compression speed, the result of data encoding was 1830.