Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/ryzen-5-1600-vs-ryzen-5-3600%23gaming
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
3060
Radeon RX
580
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i3
12100F
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Core i3
1115G4
Ryzen 5
5600X
Core i5
12400F
EPYC
7h22
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 5 1600 — Valorant with R5 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison
R5 with
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Valorant
R5 with
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 1600
Multi-Thread Performance
19634 Pts
12265 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2900 Pts
1821 Pts
Valorant
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 5 1600 in Valorant using R5 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions
Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 1600
Ultra Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
50. 0 FPS
|
1080p |
39.7 FPS
|
1440p |
39.5 FPS
|
1440p |
32.4 FPS
|
2160p |
34.4 FPS
|
2160p |
28.3 FPS
|
w1440p |
39.6 FPS
|
w1440p |
32.5 FPS
|
High Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
87.4 FPS
|
1080p |
71. 7 FPS
|
1440p |
71.4 FPS
|
1440p |
60.2 FPS
|
2160p |
63.4 FPS
|
2160p |
53.5 FPS
|
w1440p |
71.6 FPS
|
w1440p |
60.3 FPS
|
Medium Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
124.9 FPS
|
1080p |
103.7 FPS
|
1440p |
103. 3 FPS
|
1440p |
88.0 FPS
|
2160p |
92.4 FPS
|
2160p |
78.7 FPS
|
w1440p |
103.5 FPS
|
w1440p |
88.2 FPS
|
Low Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
199.8 FPS
|
1080p |
167.8 FPS
|
1440p |
167.1 FPS
|
1440p |
143. 5 FPS
|
2160p |
150.3 FPS
|
2160p |
129.2 FPS
|
w1440p |
167.5 FPS
|
w1440p |
143.9 FPS
|
Ryzen 5 3600
- The Ryzen 5 3600 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
- For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU’s with higher core count and lower core speed.
- The Ryzen 5 3600 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
- The Ryzen 5 3600 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Ryzen 5 1600
Compare Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 5 1600 specifications
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 5 1600 Architecture
Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 5 1600 | |
---|---|---|
Codename | Zen 2 | Zen |
Generation | Ryzen 5 (Zen 2) |
Ryzen 5 (Zen) |
Market | Desktop | Desktop |
Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Part# | unknown | YD1600BBM6IAEYD1600BBAEBOX |
Production Status | Active | Active |
Released | Jul 2019 | Apr 2017 |
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 5 1600 Cache
Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 5 1600 | |
---|---|---|
Cache L1 | 96K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
Cache L2 | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
Cache L3 | 32MB (shared) | 16MB (shared) |
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 5 1600 Cores
Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 5 1600 | |
---|---|---|
# of Cores | 6 | 6 |
# of Threads | 12 | 12 |
Integrated Graphics | N/A | N/A |
SMP # CPUs | 1 | 1 |
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 5 1600 Performance
Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 5 1600 | |
---|---|---|
Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
Frequency | 3. 6 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
Multiplier | 36.0x | 32.0x |
Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
TDP | 65 W | 65 W |
Turbo Clock | up to 4.2 GHz | up to 3.6 GHz |
Voltage | variable | unknown |
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 5 1600 Physical
Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 5 1600 | |
---|---|---|
Die Size | unknown | 192 mm² |
Foundry | TSMC | GlobalFoundries |
Package | µPGA | |
Process Size | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | AMD Socket AM4 |
Transistors | 4,800 million | 4800 million |
tCaseMax | unknown | unknown |
Share Your Comments 0
Compare Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 5 1600 in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity
2016
Hitman
2016
Rise of the Tomb Raider
2016
The Division
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
DiRT Rally
2015
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
The Witcher 3
2015
Total War: Attila
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Dragon Age: Inquisition
2014
Far Cry 4
2014
GRID Autosport
2014
Shadow of Mordor
2014
The Talos Principle
2014
Battlefield 4
2013
Crysis 3
2013
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
Comparison of AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF and AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF and AMD Ryzen 5 3600 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Technologies, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF
versus
AMD RYZEN 5 3600
Advantages
reasons to select AMD RYZEN 5 3600
- processor unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows you to easily make overclocking
- more, the ability to run more applications at the same time: 8 VS 6
- 4 threads more: 16 vs 12
- About 22% more clock speed: 4.4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process for the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Performance in the 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score benchmark is about 39% higher: 4652 vs 3343
Unlocked | Unlocked / Locked |
Number of cores | 8 vs 6 |
Number of threads | 16 vs 12 |
Maximum frequency | 4. 4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz |
Process | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 4652 vs 3343 |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 5 3600
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score |
|
Name | AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 3343 | 4652 |
PassMark — Single thread mark | 2568 | |
PassMark — CPU mark | 17794 | |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 1196 | |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 6759 |
Performance comparison
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | |
---|---|---|
Architecture name | Zen+ | Zen 2 |
Production date | Q1’2020 | March 2019 |
OPN Tray | YD1600BBAFBOX | |
Place in the ranking | 1562 | 866 |
Applicability | Desktop | Desktop |
Base frequency | 3. 2 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
Level 3 cache | 16MB | 16 MB (shared) |
Process | 12nm | 7nm |
Maximum frequency | 3.6 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
Number of cores | 6 | 8 |
Number of threads | 12 | 16 |
Support 64 bit | ||
Level 1 cache | 96K (per core) | |
Level 2 cache | 512K (per core) | |
Number of transistors | 4800 million | |
Unlocked | ||
Maximum number of memory channels | 2 | |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 39. 74 GB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 64GB | |
Supported memory types | DDR4-2667 | DDR4 |
Supported sockets | AM4 | AM4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Maximum number of processors in configuration | 1 | |
Number of PCI Express lanes | 20 | |
Fused Multiply-Add 3 (FMA3) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions 2 (AVX2) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |
News Sir Whoopass: Immortal Death: Updates
|
PC
Developers Atomic Heart unveiled extended PC system requirements with expected performance of
|
Industry
«She’s worth the wait»: Hollow Knight: Silksong tester decides to support desperate fans
|
PC
Hogwarts Legacy Early Access Available on PC
The Resident Evil 4 remake will include a knife fight with Krauser that inspired the new parry system
Stunning Poison Ivy figure from DC comics announced
|
Industry
Command & Conquer: Generals turns 20
|
Rumors
Resident Evil 4 is rumored to be a very «accurate» remake, but will «strongly rethink and change» some parts
|
Trailers
A new teaser for the atmospheric action game Nobody’s Left, which draws inspiration from The Last of Us series, has been released
|
Industry
Game journalists are afraid to write reviews on Hogwarts Legacy
|
Consoles
Video shows what a remake of Resident Evil 3 for PS1 would look like
|
Updates
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 technical issue pushed back content update
|
Events
We will be shown a new gameplay from Robocop: Rogue City: Nacon announced a new game presentation
|
Reviews
Editorial
Review of Hogwarts Legacy — the perfect magical world of the beloved universe
|
Trailers
A fresh trailer for the bloody action Wanted: Dead dedicated to the world of the game
|
Industry
Remedy: Alan Wake 2 is playable from start to finish.