AMD A8-7410 vs Intel Core i5-12400 Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
|
|
AMD A8-7410 vs Intel Core i5-12400
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD A8-7410 on one side and the Intel Core i5-12400 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the notebook sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 2,5GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 12 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | AMD A8-7410 | Intel Core i5-12400 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Notebook | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Puma | Alder Lake | ||||||
| Core name | Puma+ | Alder Lake-S | ||||||
| Family | A8-7000 | Core i5-12000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec |
AM7410ITJ44JB |
CM8071504555317, |
||||||
| Release date | Q2 2015 | Q1 2022 | ||||||
| Lithography | 28 nm | Intel 7 | ||||||
| Transistors | 930. 000.000 |
— | ||||||
| Cores | 4 | 6 | ||||||
| Threads | 4 | 12 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 2,2 GHz | 2,5 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 2,5 GHz | 4,4 GHz | ||||||
| High performance cores |
— |
6 Cores 12 Threads @ 2,5 / 4,4 GHz |
||||||
| Cache memory | 2 MB | 18 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 8 GB | 128 GB | ||||||
| Memory types |
DDR3-1866 |
DDR5-4800 |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 1 | 2 | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 8 | 20 | ||||||
| TDP | 15 W | 65 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | — | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | AMD Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics (Beema) | Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Alder Lake) | ||||||
| GPU cores | 8 | — | ||||||
| GPU execution units | — | 24 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 128 | 192 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 800 MHz | 300 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 847 MHz | 1450 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 216,8 GFLOPS | 537,6 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | BGA | LGA1700 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | — | Socket LGA 1700 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 90°C | 100°C | ||||||
| AI accelerator |
— |
Gaussian & Neural Accelerator |
||||||
| Crypto engine |
— |
AES New Instructions, |
||||||
| Security |
— |
OS Guard, |
||||||
| Max display resolution |
— |
4096 x 2160@60Hz (HDMI), |
||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 170 | 670 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 639 | 4. 972 |
||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 70 | 248 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 170 | 1.823 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 single thread | 134 | 637 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 327 | 4.773 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 792 | 3.038 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 1.817 | 17.124 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
1.280 | 7.313 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
3. 195 |
32.290 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 single core |
273 | 1.643 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core |
806 | 8.558 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
24,22 GFLOPS | 568,9 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
213 pts / W | 497 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor Intel Core i5-12400 has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i5-12400 is bigger, that the PDT of AMD A8-7410 is lower. The Intel Core i5-12400 was started more recently.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12400 |
670 4.  972 |
| AMD A8-7410 |
170 639 |
In single core, the difference is 294%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 678%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12400 |
248 1.823 |
| AMD A8-7410 |
70 170 |
In single core, the difference is 254%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 972%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12400 |
637 4.773 |
| AMD A8-7410 |
134 327 |
In single core, the difference is 375%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 1360%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12400 |
3.038 17.124 |
| AMD A8-7410 |
792 1.817 |
In single core, the difference is 284%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 842%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12400 |
7.313 32.290 |
| AMD A8-7410 |
1.280 3.195 |
In single core, the difference is 471%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 911%.
On Linux 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12400 |
6.681 29.855 |
| AMD A8-7410 |
1.157 2.131 |
In single core, the difference is 477%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 1301%.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12400 |
6.531 26.208 |
| AMD A8-7410 |
1.258 3.030 |
In single core, the difference is 419%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 765%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12400 |
1.643 8.558 |
| AMD A8-7410 |
273 806 |
In single core, the difference is 502%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 962%.
On Linux:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12400 |
1.816 9.158 |
| AMD A8-7410 |
284 862 |
In single core, the difference is 539%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 962%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
AMD A8-7410 Intel equivalentIntel Core i5-12400 AMD equivalent
See also:
Intel Core i5-12400FIntel Core i5-12400TIntel Core i5-1240PIntel Core i5-1240U
AMD A8-7600 vs. Intel Core i5-4460
AMD A8-7600
The AMD A8-7600 operates with 4 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 3.80 GHz base 3.50 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W.The processor is attached to the FM2+ CPU socket. This version includes 4.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-2133 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Kaveri (Steamroller) Architecture is enhanced with 28 nm technology and supports AMD-V. The product was launched on Q1/2014
Intel Core i5-4460
The Intel Core i5-4460 operates with 4 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 3.40 GHz base 3.30 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 84 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 1150 CPU socket.
This version includes 6.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-1600 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Haswell S Architecture is enhanced with 22 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q2/2014
AMD A8-7600
Intel Core i5-4460
Compare Detail
| 3.10 GHz | Frequency | 3.20 GHz |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 3.80 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 3.40 GHz |
| 3.50 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | 3.30 GHz |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking | No |
| normal | Core Architecture | normal |
|
AMD Radeon R7 — 512 (Kaveri) |
GPU |
Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | 1. 10 GHz |
| 28 nm | Technology | 22 nm |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | 1.10 GHz |
| 12 | DirectX Version | 11.1 |
| 2 | Max. displays | 3 |
| DDR3-2133 | Memory | DDR3-1600 |
| 2 | Memory channels | 2 |
| Max memory | ||
| Yes | ECC | No |
| — | L2 Cache | — |
| 4.00 MB | L3 Cache | 6.00 MB |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| 16 | PCIe lanes | 16 |
| 28 nm | Technology | 22 nm |
| FM2+ | Socket | LGA 1150 |
| 65 W | TDP | 84 W |
| AMD-V | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Q1/2014 | Release date | Q2/2014 |
|
Show more data |
Show more data |
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite.
Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.