AMD Ryzen 7 3700X vs Intel Core i9-9900K
Summary
-
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
100%
-
Intel Core i9-9900K
104%
Relative performance
-
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
100%
-
Intel Core i9-9900K
109%
Relative performance
-
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
101%
-
Intel Core i9-9900K
100%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider AMD Ryzen 7 3700X |
This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below). |
Reasons to consider Intel Core i9-9900K |
9% higher single threaded performance. |
Has an integrated GPU, which allows to run the system without a dedicated graphics card, unlike the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X. |
Gaming
No clear winner declared
Productivity
No clear winner declared
Features
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | Intel Core i9-9900K | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
MMX | ||||
SSE | ||||
SSE2 | ||||
SSE3 | ||||
SSSE3 | ||||
SSE4A | ||||
SSE4. 1 | ||||
SSE4.2 | ||||
AES | ||||
AVX | ||||
AVX2 | ||||
BMI1 | ||||
BMI2 | ||||
SHA | ||||
F16C | ||||
FMA3 | ||||
AMD64 | ||||
EVP | ||||
AMD-V | ||||
SMAP | ||||
SMEP | ||||
SMT | ||||
Precision Boost 2 | ||||
XFR 2 | ||||
EIST | ||||
Intel 64 | ||||
XD bit | ||||
VT-x | ||||
VT-d | ||||
HTT | ||||
AES-NI | ||||
TSX | ||||
TXT | ||||
CLMUL | ||||
Boost 2. 0 |
Architecture
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | Intel Core i9-9900K | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Architecture | AMD Zen 2 | vs | Intel_Coffelake | |
Market | Desktop | vs | Desktop | |
Memory Support | DDR4 | vs | DDR4 | |
Codename | Zen 2 | vs | Coffee Lake | |
Release Date | Dec 2019 | vs | Sep 2018 |
Cores
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | Intel Core i9-9900K | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cores | 8 | vs | 8 | |
Threads | 16 | vs | 16 | |
SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 | |
Integrated Graphics | No | vs | UHD Graphics 630 |
Cache
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | Intel Core i9-9900K | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
L1 Cache | 96K (per core) | vs | 64 KB (per core) | |
L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | vs | 256 KB (per core) | |
L3 Cache | 32MB | vs | 16896 KB (shared) |
Physical
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | Intel Core i9-9900K | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | vs | Intel Socket 1151 | |
Max Case Temp | unknown | vs | 72°C | |
Package | vs | FC-LGA14C | ||
Die Size | unknown | vs | unknown | |
Process | 7 nm | vs | 14 nm |
Performance
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | Intel Core i9-9900K | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cpu Frequency | 3600 MHz | vs | 3600 MHz | |
Turbo Clock | 4400 MHz | vs | 5000 MHz | |
Base Clock | 100 MHz | vs | 100 MHz | |
Voltage | variable | vs | unknown | |
TDP | 65 W | vs | 95 W |
-
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
4928 points
-
Intel Core i9-9900K
6000 points
Points — higher is better
-
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
39352 points
-
Intel Core i9-9900K
41472 points
Points — higher is better
-
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
2101
-
Intel Core i9-9900K
2077
points — higher is better
-
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
199
-
Intel Core i9-9900K
218
points — higher is better
Ryzen 7 3700X vs i9-9900K — Fortnite Battle Royale with GTX 1660 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison
GTX 1660 with
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Fortnite Battle Royale
GTX 1660 with
Intel Core i9-9900K @ 3. 60GHz
Ryzen 7 3700X
i9-9900K
Multi-Thread Performance
23838 Pts
20500 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2917 Pts
2908 Pts
Fortnite Battle Royale
Ryzen 7 3700X vs i9-9900K in Fortnite Battle Royale using GTX 1660 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions
Ryzen 7 3700X
i9-9900K
Ultra Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
87.4 FPS |
1080p |
90.1 FPS |
1440p |
57.0 FPS |
1440p |
57.9 FPS |
2160p |
30.9 FPS |
2160p |
31.3 FPS |
w1440p |
47.0 FPS |
w1440p |
47.7 FPS |
High Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
140. 7 FPS |
1080p |
144.3 FPS |
1440p |
97.8 FPS |
1440p |
99.1 FPS |
2160p |
57.8 FPS |
2160p |
58.4 FPS |
w1440p |
82.9 FPS |
w1440p |
84.0 FPS |
Medium Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
193.9 FPS |
1080p |
198.5 FPS |
1440p |
138.6 FPS |
1440p |
140.4 FPS |
2160p |
84.6 FPS |
2160p |
85.5 FPS |
w1440p |
118.9 FPS |
w1440p |
120.3 FPS |
Low Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
300. 4 FPS |
1080p |
307.0 FPS |
1440p |
220.3 FPS |
1440p |
222.9 FPS |
2160p |
138.3 FPS |
2160p |
139.7 FPS |
w1440p |
190.7 FPS |
w1440p |
192.8 FPS |
Ryzen 7 3700X
- The Ryzen 7 3700X has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
- The Ryzen 7 3700X has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
- The Ryzen 7 3700X is more power efficient and generates less heat.
- The Ryzen 7 3700X has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i9-9900K
- The i9-9900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
Compare Ryzen 7 3700X vs i9-9900K specifications
Ryzen 7 3700X vs i9-9900K Architecture
Ryzen 7 3700X | i9-9900K | |
---|---|---|
Codename | Zen 2 | Coffee Lake |
Generation | Ryzen 7 (Zen 2) |
Core i7 (Coffee Lake Refresh) |
Market | Desktop | Desktop |
Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Part# | unknown | unknown |
Production Status | Active | Active |
Released | Jul 2019 | Oct 2018 |
Ryzen 7 3700X vs i9-9900K Cache
Ryzen 7 3700X | i9-9900K | |
---|---|---|
Cache L1 | 96K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
Cache L2 | 512K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
Cache L3 | 32MB | 16MB (shared) |
Ryzen 7 3700X vs i9-9900K Cores
Ryzen 7 3700X | i9-9900K | |
---|---|---|
# of Cores | 8 | 8 |
# of Threads | 16 | 16 |
Integrated Graphics | N/A | N/A |
SMP # CPUs | 1 | 1 |
Ryzen 7 3700X vs i9-9900K Performance
Ryzen 7 3700X | i9-9900K | |
---|---|---|
Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
Frequency | 3. 6 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
Multiplier | 36.0x | 36.0x |
Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
TDP | 65 W | 95 W |
Turbo Clock | up to 4.4 GHz | up to 5 GHz |
Voltage | variable | variable |
Ryzen 7 3700X vs i9-9900K Physical
Ryzen 7 3700X | i9-9900K | |
---|---|---|
Die Size | unknown | unknown |
Foundry | TSMC | Intel |
Package | FC-LGA14C | |
Process Size | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | Intel Socket 1151 |
Transistors | 19,200 million | unknown |
tCaseMax | unknown | 72°C |
Share Your Comments 0
Compare Ryzen 7 3700X vs i9-9900K in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
AMD Ryzen7 3700X vs Intel Core i9-9900K: 8 cores with the same frequency
Home > New Gear
> AMD Ryzen7 3700X vs Intel Core i9-9900K: 8 cores with the same frequency
The performance of AMD’s third generation Ryzen should be taken into account in the evaluation. Therefore, we plan to measure interesting projects. Both the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X and the Intel i9-9900K are 8-core processors with 16 threads, but the standard frequencies are not the same, so the absolute performance is slightly different. What’s gonna happen?
Performance at the same frequency is one of the most important indicators of the pros and cons of architecture: in general, the stronger the performance at the same frequency, the greater the architectural advantage. Of course, the high frequency also represents the advantage of the architecture. Intel’s advantage is that it can be operated relatively easily at 5 GHz. It is also a fact that AMD is difficult to break through 4.4 GHz due to cold air and water.
But today this frequency indicator will not be discussed for the time being. We try to bring the Ryzen 7 3700X and the i9-9900K to a frequency of 4 GHz. Let them fight together to see if Zen 2 is powerful or Core Coffe Lake is powerful.
Ryzen 7 3700X vs i9-9900K Parameter comparison
CPU |
Ryzen 7 3700X |
I9-9900k |
Thread |
8/16 |
8/16 |
Process Node |
7 nm |
14nm |
Overclocking |
Yes |
Yes |
Clock speed |
3. 6-4.4Ghz |
3.6-4.7Ghz |
L3 cache |
36MB |
16MB |
Graphics |
No |
UHD630 |
TDP |
65W |
95W |
Price |
$399 |
$488 |
Ryzen 7 3700X uses TSMC’s 7nm process, while Intel uses 14nm technology, which hasn’t been heavily modified for many years.
The Ryzen 7 3700X’s L3 cache is much larger, and the L3 cache performance is actually very high and it’s worth looking forward to. In terms of frequency, the Intel Core architecture dominates, and for many years it has been the killer for gaming performance and single-core performance.
Also worth mentioning is the starting price, Ryzen 7 3700X from 2599, Intel i9-9900K from 4999. Both have a certain price reduction, but Ryzen 7 is much cheaper than i9.
Two processors, Intel core frequency off, AMD core acceleration off, PBO off, manual lock 40 times frequency, ie 4 GHz frequency, voltage auto, memory is also 3200 MHz, C14-14-14-34.
Ryzen 7 3700X vs i9-9900K: theoretical performance test
There are a total of 4 theoretical performance test projects, but what is unexpected is that 4 of them are all AMD victories. Although the lead is not large, it is basically able to complete the Zen 2 architecture.
Ryzen 7 3700X vs i9-9900K: Physical 3DMark calculation part
3DMARK is able to relieve the physics of the CPU: In this test, the Ryzen 7 3700X is much stronger than the i9-9900K, which is about 13% ahead.
Ryzen 7 3700X vs i9-9900K: game performance test
The difference in gaming performance between the two is not too big, but the Ryzen 7 3700X is slightly better. Given the CPU’s impact on the game, there is no large graphics card, so the superiority of Zen 2 can still be expressed.
Ryzen 7 3700X vs i9-9900K: current consumption temperature test
Power consumption and temperature test: After all of the above elements were abused by AMD, this element finally gave Intel i9-9900K a lost trust. After both sides have been downgraded to the same level, the Core i9-9900K has lower heat generation than AMD and lower power consumption.
Finally the same frequency test summary
By default, the i9-9900K can achieve the single-core score advantage of the i9-9900K CPU-Z from turbo to single-core 5.0GHz, full-core 4.7GHz, and after this round of low-frequency strike testing, the i9-9900K’s single-core score advantage was surpassed by the Ryzen 7 3700X. However, after shutdown, the i9-9900K consumes more power than the AMD processor and has a lower temperature.
This test shows that the same performance of the Ryzen 7 3700X and the i9-9900K is better than that of the i9-9900K, meaning that the AMD Zen 2 architecture has the same frequency IPC performance. Stronger than the Intel Core Coffee Lake, with a good architectural advantage to force 7nm.
Finally, a comprehensive performance comparison of all performance projects, Ryzen 7 3700X 4GHz comprehensive performance than i9-9900K be 7.8% stronger.
This is of course only a comparison test of the blocking frequency. As for the silent test, you can look down.
● Over 300,000 products ● 20 different categories ● 15 local warehosues ● Multiple top brands |
● Global payment options: Visa, MasterCard, American Express ● PayPal, Western Union and bank transfer are accepted ● Boleto Bancario via Ebanx (for Brazil) |
||
● Unregistered air mail ● Registered air mail ● Priority line ● Expedited shipping |
● 45 day money back guarantee ● 365 day free repair warranty ● 7 day Dead on Arrival guarantee (DOA) |
Related Products
Prev article:OPPO Find Y leaked: it may be the word’s first phone to adopt in-display camera technology
Next article:Xiaomi AirDots youth edition unboxing & teardown
You might also like:
Intel Core i9-9900K vs.
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Intel Core i9-9900K
Intel Core i9-9900K runs with 8 and 16 CPU threads It runs at 5.00 GHz base 4.70 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 95 W .CPU connects to socket LGA 1151-2 CPU This version includes 16.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR4-2666 RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 . Tjunction is kept below 100°C degrees C. Specifically, Coffee Lake S Refresh Architecture is advanced beyond 14 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q4/2018
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G runs with 8 and 16 CPU threads It runs at 4.60 GHz base 4.20 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 65 W .CPU connects to CPU socket AM4 This version includes 16.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR4-3200 RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 24 . Tjunction is kept below 95°C degrees C. In particular, Cezanne (Zen 3) architecture has been advanced over 7 nm and supports AMD-V, SVM . The product was launched Q2/2021
Intel Core i9-9900K
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Intel UHD Graphics 630
AMD Radeon 8 Graphics (Renoir)
Show more details
Show more details
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and gives a big advantage of hyper-threading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Theoretical processing performance of the processor’s internal graphics unit with simple precision (32 bits) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS specifies how many billions of floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies that can also be textured and animated in the program. The Blender test creates predefined scenes and measures the time(s) required for the entire scene. The less time it takes, the better. We chose the bmw27 as our reference scene.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and gives a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and gives a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU’s internal graphics unit to execute OpenGL commands.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the processors listed below have been tested with CPU-Comparison. However, most of the processors were not tested and the results were evaluated by the secret patented CPU-Comparison formula. As such, they do not accurately reflect the actual values of Passmark CPU ratings and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Monero Hashrate kH/s
Monero has been using the RandomX algorithm since November 2019of the year. This PoW (proof of work) algorithm can only be computed efficiently using either a processor (CPU) or a graphics card (GPU). The CryptoNight algorithm was used for Monero until November 2019, but it could be calculated using ASICs. RandomX benefits from a large number of CPU cores, cache, and fast memory connectivity through as many memory channels as possible.
Energy usage estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU usage (0-100%)
Cost of electricity, USD/kWh
Energy usage estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU usage (0-100%)
Cost of electricity, USD/kWh
Intel Core i9-9900K | AMD Ryzen 7 5700G | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
95 W | Max TDP | 65W | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
N. A. | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NA | Operating cost per day | NA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NA | Operating cost per year | NA |
Simple household tasks |
Core i9-9900K 79.6 (+7.7%) Ryzen 9 3900X 73.5 |
Demanding games and tasks |
Core i9-9900K 66. 2 Ryzen 9 3900X 67.1 (+1.3%) |
Extreme |
Core i9-9900K 26.1 Ryzen 93900X 39.1 (+33.2%) |
Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Benchmarks
Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.
Cinebench R23 Single Core
Intel Core i9-9900K
1284
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
1302 (+1.4%)
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
Intel Core i9-9900K
12450
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
18165 (+31.5%)
Cinebench R20 Single Core
Intel Core i9-9900K
518 (+3.1%)
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
502
Cinebench R20 Multi Core
Intel Core i9-9900k
4995
AMD Ryzen 9 3900x
6954 (+28.2%)
Cinebench R15 Single Core
Intel Core I9-9900K
219 (+2.3%)
AMD Ryzen 9
Cinebench R15 Multi Core
Intel Core i9-9900K
2245
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
3168 (+29.1%)
Geekbench 5 Single Core
Intel Core i9-9900K
1342 (+3.1%)
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
1300
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
Intel Core i9-9900K
8779
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
12454 (+29. 5%)
Blender 2.81 bmw27
Intel Core i9-9900K
163.8 (+ 29.2%)
AMD RYZEN 9 3900X
115.9
Passmark
Intel Core i9-9900k
18862
AMD Ryzen 9 3900x
32904 (+42.7%)
229
,
9,0003
tables may be missing information or missing existing features.
Basic
Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer. | Intel® Core™ i9-9900K Processor (16M Cache, up to 5.00 GHz) | |
ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. | Coffee Lake | |
Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. | 14 | No data |
Date of IssueMonth and year of the processor’s availability. | 02-2021 | 11-2021 |
Model Official name. | i9-9900K | |
Cores The number of physical cores. | 8 | 12 |
ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. | 16 | 24 |
Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores by the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. | Hyper-threading (note that some games may not work well with Hyper-threading, for maximum FPS you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard). | SMT (note that some games may not work well with SMT, for maximum FPS, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard). |
Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. | 3.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
Turbo frequencyThe maximum frequency of one processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU. | 5 | No data |
L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume. | 16 | No data |
Instructions | 64-bit | |
Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support. | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
Embedded Options Available Two enclosure versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. | No | No |
Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system. | 8 GT/s DMI3 | |
Number of QPI links | ||
TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines the heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. | 95 | No data |
Cooling system specifications | PCG 2015D (130W) |
Video core
Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. | Intel® UHD Graphics 630 | |
GPU base clockFrequency of 2D and idle operation. | 350 | No data |
Maximum GPU frequencyMaximum 3D frequency. | 1200 | No data |
Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology using the Wi-Fi 802.11n standard. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect. | ||
Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time. | 3 |
RAM
Maximum RAM Amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. | 64 | No data |
Supported type of RAM The type of RAM determines its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. | DDR4-2666 | |
RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available. | 2 | |
RAM bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | |
ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory that is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread. | No data | No data |
PCI
PCI-E The computer bus version of PCI Express. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. | 3 | No data |
PCI configuration options | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 |
Number of PCI lanes | 16 | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 |
Data Security
AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption. | No data | No data |
Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator. | No data | No data |
Design
Dimensions | No data | No data |
Supported sockets | No data | No data |
Maximum processors per motherboard | No data | No data |
Which is better
Intel Core i9-9900K
- On average, gaming performance is 6% better.
- Office applications and browsers are 5% faster.
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Faster and 13% better in complex multi-threaded applications.