Intel Core i5-2400 vs Xeon W3503
- CPU
- GPU
- SSD
- HDD
- RAM
- USB
BX80623I52400
VS
YouTube*NEW*
About
▲
595,780
▼
BUY • $20
4 Cores, 4 Threads @3.1GHz, Sandy Bridge.
Release date: Q1 2011.
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 175,620 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
1,633 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 55% Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 37% Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 37%
Great: 55%
SPEED RANK: 792nd / 1368
|
Gaming 49% Yacht |
Desktop 57% Gunboat |
Workstation 33% Sail boat |
173,987 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 74% Base clock 3. 1 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 54% Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 54%
Great: 74%
SPEED RANK: 425th / 1368
|
Gaming 67% Battle cruiser |
Desktop 71% Battleship |
Workstation 49% Yacht |
| Effective Speed Effective CPU Speed |
49.2 % | 67 % | Much faster effective speed. +36% |
| Memory Avg. Memory Latency |
80.5 Pts | 84 Pts | +4% | |||
| 1-Core Avg.  Single Core Speed
|
55.6 Pts | 81.2 Pts | Much faster single-core speed. +46% |
|||
| 2-Core Avg. Dual Core Speed |
105 Pts | 160 Pts | Much faster dual-core speed. +52% |
|||
| 4-Core Avg. Quad Core Speed |
107 Pts | 290 Pts | Hugely faster quad-core speed. +171% |
|||
| 8-Core Avg. Octa Core Speed |
108 Pts | 296 Pts | Hugely faster octa-core speed. +174% |
| Memory OC Memory Latency |
91 Pts | 91. 7 Pts |
+1% | |||
| 1-Core OC Single Core Speed |
60.4 Pts | 88.1 Pts | Much faster OC single-core speed. +46% |
|||
| 2-Core OC Dual Core Speed |
120 Pts | 172 Pts | Much faster OC dual-core speed. +43% |
|||
| 4-Core OC Quad Core Speed |
120 Pts | 335 Pts | Hugely faster OC quad-core speed. +179% |
|||
| 8-Core OC Octa Core Speed |
120 Pts | 334 Pts | Hugely faster OC octa-core speed. +178% |
Market Share
Based on 56,334,052 CPUs tested.
See market share leaders
| Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days) |
0 % | 0. 34 % |
Insanely higher market share. +∞% |
|||
| Value Value For Money |
89.1 % | 138 % | Much better value. +55% |
|||
| User Rating UBM User Rating |
50 % | 59 % | More popular. +18% |
|||
| Price Price (score) |
$32 | $20 | Much cheaper. +38% |
| Age Newest |
105+ Months | More recent. +26% |
142 Months | |||
| 64-Core OC Multi Core Speed |
120 Pts | 334 Pts | Hugely faster OC 64-core speed. +178% |
|||
| 64-Core Avg. Multi Core Speed |
108 Pts | 298 Pts | Hugely faster 64-core speed. +176% |
ADVERTISEMENT
Pros: Brilliant value for money. Cons: It’s not the 2400k which can be had for just a tiny bit more and offers a lot more flexibility in terms of overclocking. [Apr ’12 CPUPro]
MORE DETAILS
Systems with these CPUs
Top Builds that include these CPUs
- Dell Precision WorkStation T3500 (55)
- HP Z400 Workstation (50)
- Fujitsu CELSIUS M470-2 (6)
- Intel X58 (3)
- Lenovo 410597U (2)
- Asus P6T (1)
- EVGA X58 Classified 4-Way SLI (1)
- Dell OptiPlex 790 (1,253)
- HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC (1,031)
- Dell OptiPlex 990 (734)
- Dell OptiPlex 390 (553)
- Intel H61 (492)
- bin bin (482)
- HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (395)
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.
CHOOSE A COMPONENT:
CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance)
November 2022 CPU Rankings.
We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]
ADVERTISEMENT
Group Test Results
- Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
- Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.
- Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.
Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.
UserBenchmark of the month
Gaming
Desktop
ProGaming
CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB
How it works
- — Download and run UserBenchmark.
- — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
- — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
- — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- — See speed test results from other users.
- — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Frequently Asked Questions
Best User Rated
-
Intel Core i5-13600K
-
Intel Core i5-12400F
-
Intel Core i7-12700K
-
Intel Core i5-12600K
-
Intel Core i5-12400
-
Intel Core i9-13900K
-
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
-
Intel Core i3-12100F
-
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
-
Intel Core i7-11700K
-
Intel Core i3-12100
-
Intel Core i5-11400F
About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube
Feedback
Intel Core i5-3470 vs Xeon W3503
- CPU
- GPU
- SSD
- HDD
- RAM
- USB
BX80637I53470
VS
YouTube*NEW*
About
▲
566,320
▼
BUY • $160
4 Cores, 4 Threads @3.
2GHz, Ivy Bridge.
Release date: Q2 2012.
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 216,088 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
1,633 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 55% Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 37% Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 37%
Great: 55%
SPEED RANK: 792nd / 1368
|
Gaming 49% Yacht |
Desktop 57% Gunboat |
Workstation 33% Sail boat |
214,455 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 76% Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 58% Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 58%
Great: 76%
SPEED RANK: 397th / 1368
|
Gaming 68% Battle cruiser |
Desktop 72% Battleship |
Workstation 51% Yacht |
| Effective Speed Effective CPU Speed |
49. 2 % |
68.4 % | Much faster effective speed. +39% |
| Memory Avg. Memory Latency |
80.5 Pts | 82.2 Pts | +2% | |||
| 1-Core Avg. Single Core Speed |
55.6 Pts | 88.4 Pts | Much faster single-core speed. +59% |
|||
| 2-Core Avg. Dual Core Speed |
105 Pts | 175 Pts | Much faster dual-core speed. +67% |
|||
| 4-Core Avg. Quad Core Speed |
107 Pts | 315 Pts | Hugely faster quad-core speed. +194% |
|||
| 8-Core Avg. Octa Core Speed |
108 Pts | 323 Pts | Hugely faster octa-core speed. +199% |
| Memory OC Memory Latency |
91 Pts | 92.2 Pts | +1% | |||
| 1-Core OC Single Core Speed |
60.4 Pts | 95.6 Pts | Much faster OC single-core speed. +58% |
|||
| 2-Core OC Dual Core Speed |
120 Pts | 189 Pts | Much faster OC dual-core speed. +58% |
|||
| 4-Core OC Quad Core Speed |
120 Pts | 363 Pts | Hugely faster OC quad-core speed. +203% |
|||
| 8-Core OC Octa Core Speed |
120 Pts | 363 Pts | Hugely faster OC octa-core speed. +203% |
Market Share
Based on 56,334,052 CPUs tested.
See market share leaders
| Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days) |
0 % | 0.58 % | Insanely higher market share. +∞% |
|||
| Value Value For Money |
89.1 % | Better value. +12% |
79.6 % | |||
| User Rating UBM User Rating |
50 % | 56 % | More popular. +12% |
|||
| Price Price (score) |
$32 | Hugely cheaper. +80% |
$160 |
| Age Newest |
105+ Months | More recent. +17% |
127 Months | |||
| 64-Core OC Multi Core Speed |
120 Pts | 361 Pts | Hugely faster OC 64-core speed. +201% |
|||
| 64-Core Avg. Multi Core Speed |
108 Pts | 323 Pts | Hugely faster 64-core speed. +199% |
ADVERTISEMENT
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.
CHOOSE A COMPONENT:
CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance)
November 2022 CPU Rankings.
We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]
ADVERTISEMENT
Group Test Results
- Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
- Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.
- Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.
Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.
UserBenchmark of the month
Gaming
Desktop
ProGaming
CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB
How it works
- — Download and run UserBenchmark.
- — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
- — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.
com. - — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- — See speed test results from other users.
- — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Frequently Asked Questions
Best User Rated
-
Intel Core i5-13600K
-
Intel Core i5-12400F
-
Intel Core i7-12700K
-
Intel Core i5-12600K
-
Intel Core i5-12400
-
Intel Core i9-13900K
-
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
-
Intel Core i3-12100F
-
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
-
Intel Core i7-11700K
-
Intel Core i3-12100
-
Intel Core i5-11400F
About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube
Feedback
Comparison Intel Xeon W3503 vs Intel Core i5-2320 which is better?
Home / Intel Xeon W3503 VS Intel Core i5-2320
Intel Xeon W3503
2%
Devicelist
VS
Intel Core i5-2320 9000
4%
Devicelist 9000 specifications of the Intel Xeon W3503 and Intel Core i5-2320 and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you.
Find out which one to choose in 2022.
Benefits of Intel Xeon W3503
|
Number of transistors |
|
731 million 730 million (73000%) better than vs 1 million |
|
Release price |
|
$65 -95$ (-59.4%) better than vs 160 $ |
|
Value for money |
|
35.2% 1.2% (3.5%) better than vs 34% |
|
TXT |
|
vs |
Benefits of Intel Core i5-2320
Comparison winner
|
Core |
|
4 2 (100%) better than vs 2 |
|
Threads |
|
4 2 (100%) better than vs 2 |
|
Maximum frequency |
|
3. At 0.9 GHz (37.5%) better than vs 2.4 GHz |
|
Process |
|
32 nm -13 nm (-28.9%) better than vs 45 nm |
|
Power consumption (TDP) |
|
95 W -35 W (-26.9%) better than vs 130 W |
|
Passmark |
|
3649 2538 (228.4%) better than vs 1111 |
3 GHz
| General Information | |
|
Type |
|
| Server | Desktop |
|
Architecture code name |
|
| Bloomfield | Sandy Bridge |
|
Cores A large number of cores improves performance in multi-threaded applications. |
|
| 2 | 4
2 (100%) better than |
|
Threads More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
|
| 2 | 4
2 (100%) better than |
|
Base frequency |
|
| n/a | 3 GHz |
|
Process |
|
| 45 nm | 32 nm
-13 nm (-28.9%) better than |
|
Chip size |
|
| 263 mm2 | 216 mm2 |
|
Number of transistors |
|
| 731 million
730 million (73000%) better than |
1 million |
|
Maximum frequency Faster clocked processors perform more calculations per second and thus provide better performance. |
|
| 2.4GHz | 3.3 GHz
Better than at 0.9 GHz (37.5%) |
|
Support 64 bit |
|
|
Max. number of processors in configuration |
|
| 1 | 1 |
|
Socket |
|
| 1366 | LGA1155 |
|
Release price |
|
| $65
-95 $ (-59.4%) better than |
160 $ |
|
Value for money The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues. |
|
| 35.2%
1.2% (3.5%) better than |
34% |
|
Maximum core temperature |
|
| n/a | 73 °C |
|
vPro |
|
|
TXT Intel Trusted Execution Technology for hardware-based malware protection. |
|
|
PCI Express revision |
|
| no data | 2.0 |
|
Number of PCI-Express lanes |
|
| n/a | 16 |
|
Identity Protection |
|
| n/a | + |
|
Flex Memory Access |
|
| n/a | + |
|
Quick Sync |
|
| n/a | + |
|
FDI |
|
| n/a | + |
|
Fast Memory Access |
|
| n/a | + |
|
Level 1 Cache The fastest level of cache that works directly with the core. The larger the cache, the better the performance. |
|
| 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
|
Level 2 cache |
|
| 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
|
Level 3 cache |
|
| 4 MB (total) | 6 MB (total) |
|
Power Demand (TDP) Calculated thermal power shows the average heat dissipation in load operation, |
|
| 130W | 95 W
-35 W (-26.9%) better than |
|
EDB |
|
| n/a | + |
|
InTru 3D |
|
| n/a | + |
For each protected program, the processor allocates its own isolated section of RAM. 
| 3649
2538 (228.4%) better than |
||
| Technology and additional instructions | |
|
Extended instructions |
|
| n/a | Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX |
|
Turbo Boost |
|
| n/a | 2.0 |
|
Idle States |
|
|
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) Intel’s technology that allows the processor to slow down to its lowest frequency to conserve power when the processor is idle. |
|
|
Thermal Monitoring |
|
|
Hyper-Threading Intel hardware technology that allows multiple threads to be processed on each processor core. For server applications, the performance improvement is up to 30%. |
|
|
AES-NI Technology from Intel that speeds up the AES encryption process. |
|
| n/a | + |
|
AVX The presence of AVX instructions improves performance in floating point and processor-intensive operations |
|
| RAM parameters | |
|
RAM types |
|
| DDR3 | DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333 |
|
Allowable memory The maximum amount of RAM that can be used with this processor. |
|
| n/a | 32 GB |
|
Number of memory channels |
|
| n/a | 2 |
| Virtualization Technologies | |
|
VT-x |
|
|
EPT |
|
|
VT-d Intel virtualization technology allows you to forward devices on the PCI bus to the guest operating system so that it can work with them using its standard tools. |
|
| Integrated graphics | |
|
Max GPU clock |
|
| n/a | 1. 10 GHz |
|
Maximum number of monitors |
|
| n/a | 2 |
|
Clear Video HD |
|
|
Video core The presence of the video core allows you to use your computer without using a video card. |
|
| n/a | + |
Comparison Intel Xeon W3503 vs Intel Core i5-650 which is better?
Main / Processor / Intel Xeon W3503 vs Intel Core i5-650
Intel Xeon W3503
2%
Devicelist
VS
Intel Core i5-6502 8%
Devicelist
We compared the Intel Xeon W3503 and Intel Core i5-650 and compiled for you benefits and comparison table. Find out which one to choose in 2022.
Benefits of Intel Xeon W3503
|
Number of transistors |
|
731 million 349 million (91. vs 382 million |
4%) better than Benefits of Intel Core i5-650
Comparison winner
|
Threads |
|
4 2 (100%) better than vs 2 |
|
Maximum frequency |
|
3.46 GHz 1.06 GHz (44.2%) better than vs 2.4 GHz |
|
Process |
|
32 nm -13 nm (-28.9%) better than vs 45 nm |
|
Price at exit |
|
$35 -30$ (-46.2%) better than vs 65 $ |
|
Value for money |
|
73.6% 38.4% (109.1%) better than vs 35. |
|
Power consumption (TDP) |
|
73 W -57 W (-43.8%) better than vs 130 W |
|
Passmark |
|
2257 1146 (103.2%) better than vs 1111 |
2% | General Information | |
|
Type |
|
| Server | Desktop |
|
Architecture code name |
|
| Bloomfield | Clarkdale |
|
Cores A large number of cores improves performance in multi-threaded applications. |
|
| 2 | 2 |
|
Threads More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. |
|
| 2 | 4
2 (100%) better than |
|
Base frequency |
|
| n/a | 3.2 GHz |
|
Process |
|
| 45 nm | 32 nm
-13 nm (-28.9%) better than |
|
Chip size |
|
| 263 mm2 | 81 mm2 |
|
Number of transistors |
|
| 731 million
349 million (91.4%) better than |
382 million |
|
Maximum frequency Faster clocked processors perform more calculations per second and thus provide better performance. |
|
| 2.4GHz | 3.46 GHz
Better at 1.06 GHz (44.2%) than |
|
Support 64 bit |
|
|
Max. |
|
| 1 | 1 |
|
Socket |
|
| 1366 | FCLGA1156 |
|
Exit price |
|
| 65 $ | $35
-30 $ (-46.2%) better than |
|
Value for money The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues. |
|
| 35.2% | 73.6%
38.4% (109.1%) better than |
|
Maximum core temperature |
|
| n/a | 73 °C |
|
vPro |
|
|
TXT Intel Trusted Execution Technology for hardware-based malware protection. For each protected program, the processor allocates its own isolated section of RAM. |
|
|
PCI Express revision |
|
| no data | 2.0 |
|
Number of PCI-Express lanes |
|
| n/a | 16 |
|
Demand Based Switching |
|
| n/a | — |
|
PAE |
|
| n/a | 36 bit |
|
FDI |
|
| n/a | + |
|
Level 1 Cache The fastest level of cache that works directly with the core. The larger the cache, the better the performance. |
|
| 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
|
Level 2 cache |
|
| 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
|
Level 3 cache |
|
| 4 MB (total) | 4 MB (total) |
|
Power Demand (TDP) Calculated thermal power shows the average heat dissipation in load operation, |
|
| 130W | 73 W
-57 W (-43.8%) better than |
|
EDB |
|
| n/a | + |
|
Permissible core voltage |
|
| n/a | 0.65V-1.4V |
Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). 
number of processors in configuration 
| Benchmarks | |
|
Passmark |
|
| 1111 | 2257
1146 (103.2%) better than |
|
3DMark Fire Strike Physics |
|
| n/a | 6640 |
| Technology and additional instructions | |
|
Extended instructions |
|
| n/a | Intel® SSE4.2 |
|
Turbo Boost |
|
| n/a | 1.0 |
|
Idle States |
|
|
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) Intel’s technology that allows the processor to slow down to its lowest frequency to conserve power when the processor is idle. |
|
|
Hyper-Threading Intel hardware technology that allows multiple threads to be processed on each processor core. For server applications, the performance improvement is up to 30%. |
|
|
AES-NI Technology from Intel that speeds up the AES encryption process. |
|
| n/a | + |
| RAM options | |
|
RAM types |
|
| DDR3 | DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333 |
|
Allowable memory The maximum amount of RAM that can be used with this processor. |
|
| n/a | 16.38 GB |
|
Number of memory channels |
|
| n/a | 2 |
| Virtualization technologies | ||
|
EPT |
||
|
VT-d Intel virtualization technology allows you to forward devices on the PCI bus to the guest operating system so that it can work with them using its standard tools. | ||
