Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/turion-64-x2-tl-50-vs-athlon-64-x2-tk-53%23general-info
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce RTX
2060
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
Popular graphics cards
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
4090
Radeon RX
Vega 7
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1650
Radeon RX
580
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Core i5
1135G7
vs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
EPYC
7h22
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
3500U
Ryzen 3
5300U
Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/turion-64-x2-tl-50-vs-athlon-64-x2-tk-53%23characteristics
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce RTX
2060
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
Popular graphics cards
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
4090
Radeon RX
Vega 7
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1650
Radeon RX
580
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Core i5
1135G7
vs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
EPYC
7h22
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
3500U
Ryzen 3
5300U
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core TK-53 or AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-52
- Come
- >
- Processors
- > 9000 53 vs AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-52
Family
- Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core TK-55
Compare
Family
- Mobile Technology TL-58 Turion 6580038
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Office speed
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core TK-53
25.8
Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-52
28.3 (+10%) 9003 Performance8
.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core TK-53
11.5
Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-52
12.
1 (+5%) maximum The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Speed of numerical operations
Simple household tasks
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core TK-53
19.3
Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-52
20.3 (+5%)
Demanding games and tasks
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core TK-53
4.
1 (+8%) Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-52
3.8
Extreme
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core TK-53
0.8
Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-52
0.8
Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6.
A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance. When choosing a processor to work with, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Characteristics
Main
Manufacturer Firm AMD AMD Performance
Cores The total number of physical cores. 
2 2 ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. 2 2 Multithreading TechnologyWith Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores in the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. Missing Missing Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all cores (P-cores in case of corresponding architecture) of the processor at maximum load. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. 
1.7 GHz 1.6 GHz Cache and RAM
Video core
PCI
Detailed information
Which is better
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core TK-53
- 8% faster performance in office applications and browsers.
- The base frequency is 0.1 GHz higher.
AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-52
- On average, 11% better gaming performance.
How they are similar
- In complex multi-threaded applications, they are approximately equal.
- The number of physical cores is equal.
No design bureau
RAM
RAM controller
There are
Types of RAM
DDR2-433, DDR2-400, DDR2-667
2
RIGH -56
Attention! The general rating calculation method is chosen, which means that the rating percentage is calculated relative to the most powerful processor participating on our site.
2835
(4.57%)
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Multipoque test
0.88
(0.83%)
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) single-circuit test
9003 4.28%)
Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test
73.75
(0.7%)
Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
37.57
10.21%
Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test
1696
(0.91%)
geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) single-test test
981
(6.24%)
x264 HD 4.0 Pass 1
20.7
(0.8%)
x264 HD 4.0 PASS 2
4.68
(0.76%)
3DMark06 CPU
1340
(0.94%)
Winrar 4.0
495.49
(0.83%)
Attention! The general rating calculation method is selected, which means that the percentage of the rating is calculated regarding the most powerful processor participating on our site.
Rating calculation method:
Overall rankingBy Trinidad architectureBy Socket S1Among Intel processorsAmong AMD processorsAmong mobile processorsAmong Turion family processorsAmong Turion 64 processorsAmong 2-core processorsAmong 2006 processorsOverall performance rating
0038(out of 3291)
Passmark CPU Mark
The ranking 3279 processors529 529 place
(out of 3279)
Cinebench 10 (32 bits) Multipoque Test
In the ranking is participated out of 723)Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test
3221 processors participate in the rating630 place
(out of 3221)
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
38
564 place
(out of 3215)
Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Multipoque test
in the ranking 3218 processors600
(out of 3218)
Cinebench 15 (64-Byt) one-time test 9002 The rating is participated in 3217 processors
624 place
(out of 3217)
Geekbench 4.
0 (64-bit) multi-control test
in the ranking 3209 processors(of 3209)
Geekben 4.0.0) Single Thread Test
The ranking is involved in 3209 processors562 place
(out of 3209)
x264 HD 4.0 Pass 1
in the ranking 3211 processors604 place
(out of 3211)
x264 HD 222 3211 processors
608 place
(from 3211)
3dmark06 CPU
in the ranking 3242 processors708 place
(out of 3242)
Winrar 4.0
in the ranking.0038546 place
(out of 3212)
Energy saving technologies Technology or instruction name Meaning Short description Deeper Sleep state Deeper sleep state. PowerNow! «PowerNow!» idle frequency reduction technology. Standard set of extensions Technology or instruction name Meaning Short description MMX (Multimedia Extensions) Multimedia extensions. 
SSE (Streaming SIMD Extensions) Processor streaming SIMD extension. SSE2 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 2) Processor Streaming SIMD Extension 2. SSE3 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 3) Streaming SIMD Processor Extension 3. AMD64 64-bit microprocessor architecture developed by AMD. 3DNow! Optional MMX extension for AMD processors. Safety technology Technology or instruction name Meaning Short description EVP (Enhanced Virus Protection) Improved virus protection. Virtualization technologies Technology or instruction name Meaning Short description AMD-V AMD-V Virtualization Technology. 
AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-56 Processor Overview
The Turion 64 X2 TL-56 belongs to AMD’s mobile processor family and uses the Trinidad microarchitecture at its core. Entered the processor market on May 4, 2007.
The temperature limit in the load will be 95 degrees. With a technical process of 90 Nm, the total number of transistors reaches 154 million. Compatible with Socket S1 motherboards. The bus speed will be 800 MHz 16-bit HyperTransport (1.6 GT/s).
A fairly powerful model when released in 2006, which can provide quality PC gaming.
Competitors and analogues
On the Socket S1 socket, AMD models should be noted among competitors: model P560 from the Turion II processor line, Turion II N550 2010, Athlon II N370 2011, Turion II UltraMobile M620 2009, model M660 among the line of processors Turion II UltraMobile, Turion II P540 based on Champlain architecture. Intel’s competitors include the 585 on a PGA478 socket among the Celeron line, which appeared later Pentium T3400, Core 2 Duo T5800 based on the Merom microarchitecture, Core 2 Duo T7250 based on the Merom microarchitecture, Celeron 575, released a little later, and Core 2 Duo T5900 2007 release.
