A4-3300M [in 8 benchmarks]
AMD
A4-3300M
Buy
- Interface
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory
- Memory type
- Memory clock speed
- Maximum resolution
Summary
AMD started AMD A4-3300M sales 14 June 2011. This is Llano architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 2 cores and 2 threads, and is based on 32 nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 2500 MHz and a locked multiplier.
Compatibility-wise, this is
AMD Socket FS1
processor with a TDP of 35 Watt. It supports DDR3 memory.
It provides poor benchmark performance at
1.18%
of a leader’s which is AMD EPYC 7h22.
A4
3300M
vs
EPYC
7h22
General info
A4-3300M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.
| Place in performance rating | 2296 | |
| Market segment | Laptop | |
| Series | AMD A-Series | |
| Architecture codename | Llano (2011−2012) | |
| Release date | 14 June 2011 (11 years ago) | |
| Current price | $61 | of 16317 (EPYC 7351) |
Technical specs
Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | |
| Threads | 2 | |
| Base clock speed | 1. 9 GHz |
of 4.7 (FX-9590) |
| Boost clock speed | 2.5 GHz | of 5.8 (Core i9-13900K) |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | of 1536 (EPYC Embedded 3401) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | of 12 (Core 2 Quad Q9550) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | of 32768 (Ryzen Threadripper 1998) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | of 5 (Apple M1) |
| Die size | 228 mm2 | |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | of 9900000 (Ryzen 9 7950X) |
| 64 bit support | + | |
| Windows 11 compatibility | — |
Compatibility
Information on A4-3300M compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc.
Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | of 8 (Opteron 842) |
| Socket | FS1 | |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 35 Watt | of 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282) |
Technologies and extensions
Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by A4-3300M. You’ll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, DDR3 Memory Controller, Radeon HD 6480G |
Virtualization technologies
Supported virtual machine optimization technologies.
Some are specific to Intel only, some to AMD.
| AMD-V | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by A4-3300M’s memory controller. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | of 5200 (Ryzen 5 7600X) |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of GPU integrated into A4-3300M.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 6480G |
Benchmark performance
Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of A4-3300M. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
A4-3300M
1.18
- Passmark
- GeekBench 5 Single-Core
- GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
- Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
- Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
- 3DMark06 CPU
- Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 69%
A4-3300M
1186
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance.
This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
A4-3300M
253
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
A4-3300M
446
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
A4-3300M
1742
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads.
Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
A4-3300M
3417
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
A4-3300M
1556
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
A4-3300M
1
Relative perfomance
Overall A4-3300M performance compared to nearest competitors among notebook CPUs.
AMD A6-3400M
100
Intel Core i5-430M
100
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900
100
AMD A4-3300M
100
Intel Pentium N3530
100
Intel Celeron J3355
99.
15
Intel Core i3-390M
99.15
Intel equivalent
We believe that the nearest equivalent to A4-3300M from Intel is Core i5-430M, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 4 positions in our rating.
Core i5
430M
Compare
Here are some closest Intel rivals to A4-3300M:
Intel Pentium N3530
100
Intel Core i5-430M
100
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900
100
AMD A4-3300M
100
Intel Core i3-380M
99.15
Intel Core i3-390M
99.
15
Intel Pentium 3805U
99.15
Similar processors
Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
Core 2
Duo T9900
Compare
A6
3400M
Compare
Pentium
N3530
Compare
Core i5
430M
Compare
Core i3
3217U
Compare
Core i3
2310M
Compare
Recommended graphics cards
These graphics cards are most commonly used with A4-3300M according to our statistics.
Radeon HD
6480G
40%
Radeon HD
6650M
6.7%
Radeon HD
6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics
4.5%
Radeon HD
6410D IGP
4.4%
Radeon HD
6470M
4.4%
Radeon HD
7400G
2.7%
Radeon RX
6600M
2.3%
Radeon
Graphics
1.
8%
HD
Graphics 4000
1.5%
Radeon HD
6450
1.1%
User rating
Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about A4-3300M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/a4-3300m%23general-info
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce RTX
2060
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
Popular graphics cards
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
4090
Radeon RX
Vega 7
GeForce RTX
3090 Ti
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1650
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Core i5
1135G7
vs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 7
3700X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
EPYC
7h22
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
3500U
Ryzen 3
5300U
AMD A4-3300M APU:
processor specifications
AMD started selling the A4-3300M on June 14, 2011.
This is a processor for laptops, it has 2 cores and 2 threads, the processor is made according to the 32 nm process technology.
Processor made for socket FS1, TDP 35W. DDR3 memory is supported.
Specifications
General information
- Release date
- June 14, 2011
- Market price
- $61
- Purpose
- for laptops
- Architecture
- Llano
- Series
- AMD A-Series
- Process
- 32 nm
- Crystal size
- 228 mm²
- Number of transistors
- 178 million
- Processor capacity
- 64 bit
Frequencies and performance
- Clock speed
- 1900 MHz
- Maximum frequency
- 2500 MHz
- Number of cores
- 2
- Number of threads
- 2
- Level 1 cache
- 128 KB
- Level 2 cache
- 1024 KB
Memory
- Memory type
- DDR3
Integrated graphics
- Integrated graphics
- AMD Radeon HD 6480G
Compatible
- Socket
- FS1
- Heat dissipation
- 35W
- Maximum number of processors in configuration
- 1
- Windows 11 support
- No
Technology and instructions
- Virtualization technologies
- AMD-V
- Instruction sets
- 3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a
Benchmarks
Comparison with other processors
Processor 1:
Processor 2:
Video reviews and tests
Error 403 The request cannot be completed because you have exceeded your quota.
: quotaExceeded
If you find an error or have something to add, write in the comments. Have you had any experience with this processor? Is it worth buying one today?
Share with friends
Processor AMD A4-3300M APU: specifications and price
Amd a4 3300m test
The base frequency of the A4-3300M APU cores is 1.9 GHz. The maximum frequency in AMD Turbo Core mode reaches 2.2 GHz.
Price in Russia
Do you want to buy cheap A4-3300M APU? Look at the list of stores that already sell the processor in your city.
Family
Benchmarks AMD A4-3300M APU
Game speed
Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.
The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Speed in office use
Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office applications.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores.
The performance of all cores and their number have the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Numeric Speed
Simple Home Tasks
Demanding Games and Tasks
Extreme Load
Different tasks require different CPU strengths.
A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests of users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Benchmarks
Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.
Price in Russia
Do you want to buy cheap A4-3300M APU? Look at the list of stores that already sell the processor in your city.
Speed in games
Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.
The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Speed in office use
Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office applications.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores.
The performance of all cores and their number have the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.
Benchmarkdb. en
06/20/2020 18:58:39
2020-06-20 18:58:39
Sources:
Https://benchmarkdb. ru/cpu/amd/a4-3300m_apu/
Processor AMD A4-3300M: Notebook Center » /> » /> .keyword { color: red; }
Amd a4 3300m test
The AMD A4-3300M (codenamed Llano) is an entry level dual core processor (APU) for notebooks. APU (Accelerated Processing Units), belonging to the Fusion family, is equipped with an integrated graphics card Radeon HD 6480G. The cores run at 1.9 GHz, but with the TurboCore feature, the processor can be overclocked up to 2.5 GHz.
The processor core belongs to the Husky family. The Husky cores are very similar to those used in the Phenom II mobile processor. The difference is that the new chips have a hardware divider. However, the performance of the processor should be on par with the outdated Turion II, Athlon II, Phenom II (just like the Llano APU, these mobile CPUs have L2 cache).
AMD A4-3300M is comparable in performance to AMD Athlon II M320. In single-threaded applications with TurboCore, the processor will work a little faster, and in multi-threaded applications it will be slower. Therefore, CPU performance will be significantly worse than similarly clocked Sandy Bridge processors (eg Core i3-2310M).
The processors of the Llano family are equipped with an integrated graphics card that supports DirectX 11. The maximum number of shader cores is four hundred. The A4 series processors have an AMD Radeon HD 6480G card with 240 cores (444 MHz). The adapter does not have its own memory, it also cannot use the built-in cache memory (unlike the Intel HD 3000). In addition, the APU is equipped with a UVD3 video decoder for HD video decoding (H.264, VC-1, MPEG4).
The AMD A4-3300M has a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L-1333) and supports PCIe 2.0.
The TDP of the whole package is 35W. This allows you to install the processor in 14- and 15-inch laptops.
However, the performance of the processor should be on par with the outdated Turion II, Athlon II, Phenom II as well as Llano APU, these mobile CPUs have L2 cache.
www. notebook center. en
16.09.2018 15:27:20
2018-09-16 15:27:20
Sources:
Https://www. notebook center. ru/processor_526.html
AMD APU A4-3300 review and testing. Page 1 » /> » /> .keyword { color: red; }
Amd a4 3300m test
On the pages of our portal you could already get acquainted with different versions of hybrid processors ( A8-3850 , AMD A6-3650 , A4-3400 ), which are capable of providing system performance in a fairly wide range. Of course, they are not aimed at setting any record performance indicators, however, as practice shows, they provide the owner with a fairly powerful integrated graphics core, which in turn “opens up new horizons” for displaying media content, in comparison with integrated graphics adapters from Intel.
Today we will get acquainted with the junior representative of the AMD APU line. Naturally, AMD APU A4-3300 , like any other junior representative of any product line, is positioned as a budget solution aimed at providing a minimum level of performance. We will try to evaluate the possibilities and decide for what kind of tasks it is best suited.
Appearance and packaging
The graphic design of the boxed version of the junior representative of AMD APU A4-3300 hybrid CPUs is absolutely identical to the models reviewed earlier. The same bright and catchy.
Standard packaging is characterized by minimal dimensions, which is typical for the entire series. A traditional transparent window, through which you can easily get acquainted with the processor and its markings, is located on the left side wall. The main features are prudently emphasized by the manufacturer: increased energy efficiency, support for the DirectX 11 instruction set by the integrated video core.
The APUs of this series do an excellent job of playing HD video, and are also designed to «help keep in touch with relatives and friends», while providing system multitasking.
On the top side there is a familiar sticker with the key characteristics of the hybrid processor in question: model ( A4 3300 ), clock frequency ( 2.5 GHz ), cache memory size ( 1 MB ), processor connector ( FM1 ), serial number and product code.
An important and distinguishing feature of budget APUs belonging to the AMD VISION A4 class is support for AMD Dual Graphics technology. At the same time, it only supports operation in combination with AMD Radeon HD 6450 video cards. Naturally, no one says that the owner will not be able to supply a more productive solution at some point, however, guaranteed compatibility in this mode is present only with AMD Radeon HD 6450.
The usual configuration of the APU box version is typical for both high-performance solutions and budget ones.
It is represented by a cooling system, instructions for installing the processor, which also contains information about warranty obligations, and a branded sticker for a PC case indicating the model range.
The complete cooling system is marked 1A02M5M00. Judging by the information on the Web, this solution is the brainchild of AMD. Traditionally, it was used with processors that have a fairly low TDP value, such as the AMD Athlon II X4 615e. A cursory glance is enough to understand that this is a budget version of the cooler, which will provide the temperature regime required for a hybrid processor operating at standard settings, but no more. The design is standard for solutions of this class supplied in boxed versions of AMD CPUs — it consists of an aluminum heatsink and a fan. The background noise during operation is not too great, however, if the system unit is placed close to the user, over time, it may be necessary to replace it with a more efficient and quiet cooling system.