Videocard benchmark list: PassMark Software — Video Card (GPU) Benchmarks

8 февраля, 2023

GPU 2012 Benchmarks — Compare Products on AnandTech

BENCH
Bench gives you access to our internal benchmark data so that you can compare the products without searching for an older review. Make reliable comparisons between products by clicking
on product categories below!

  • SSD 2021

  • CPU 2021

  • GPU 2019

  • Mobile 2018

  • SSD 2018

  • Notebook

  • Mobile 2016

  • CPU 2019

  • GPU 2018

  • GPU 2017

  • CPU

  • SSD 2017

  • Mac

  • CPU Cooling

  • GPU 2016

  • GPU 2015

  • GPU 2014

  • GPU 2013

  • GPU 2012

  • Mobile 14

  • SSD 2015

  • SSD 2013



GPU12 Product Benchmarks


Choose First ProductAMD Radeon HD 3870AMD Radeon HD 4870AMD Radeon HD 5750AMD Radeon HD 5770AMD Radeon HD 5850AMD Radeon HD 5870AMD Radeon HD 5970AMD Radeon HD 6670AMD Radeon HD 6850AMD Radeon HD 6870AMD Radeon HD 6950AMD Radeon HD 6970AMD Radeon HD 6990AMD Radeon HD 7750AMD Radeon HD 7770AMD Radeon HD 7850AMD Radeon HD 7870AMD Radeon HD 7950AMD Radeon HD 7950 w/BoostAMD Radeon HD 7970AMD Radeon HD 7970 CFAMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz EditionNVIDIA GeForce 8800GTNVIDIA GeForce GT 240NVIDIA GeForce GT 440NVIDIA GeForce GT 640NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 1GBNVIDIA GeForce GTX 470NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 TiNVIDIA GeForce GTX 560NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 TiNVIDIA GeForce GTX 570NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 SLINVIDIA GeForce GTX 590NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 TiNVIDIA GeForce GTX 660NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 TiNVIDIA GeForce GTX 670NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 SLINVIDIA GeForce GTX 690


Choose Second ProductAMD Radeon HD 3870AMD Radeon HD 4870AMD Radeon HD 5750AMD Radeon HD 5770AMD Radeon HD 5850AMD Radeon HD 5870AMD Radeon HD 5970AMD Radeon HD 6670AMD Radeon HD 6850AMD Radeon HD 6870AMD Radeon HD 6950AMD Radeon HD 6970AMD Radeon HD 6990AMD Radeon HD 7750AMD Radeon HD 7770AMD Radeon HD 7850AMD Radeon HD 7870AMD Radeon HD 7950AMD Radeon HD 7950 w/BoostAMD Radeon HD 7970AMD Radeon HD 7970 CFAMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz EditionNVIDIA GeForce 8800GTNVIDIA GeForce GT 240NVIDIA GeForce GT 440NVIDIA GeForce GT 640NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 1GBNVIDIA GeForce GTX 470NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 TiNVIDIA GeForce GTX 560NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 TiNVIDIA GeForce GTX 570NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 SLINVIDIA GeForce GTX 590NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 TiNVIDIA GeForce GTX 660NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 TiNVIDIA GeForce GTX 670NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 SLINVIDIA GeForce GTX 690


View Single Product
View Comparison





Bench Results

Crysis: Warhead — 1920×1200 — Frost Bench — Enthusiast Quality + 4xAA
Frames per Second — Higher is Better

Product Ratings & Comparisons


AMD Radeon HD 7970 CF
2x925MHz/5. 5GHz 3GB GDDR5
99.7


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 SLI
2x1006MHz/6.006GHz 2GB GDDR5
87


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
2x915MHz/6.006GHz 2GB GDDR5
85.5


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 SLI
2x772MHz/1544MHz/4.0GHz 1.5GB GDDR5
75.5


AMD Radeon HD 6990
2x830MHz/5.0GHz 2x2GB GDDR5
66.3


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
2x607MHz/2x1214MHz/3. 414GHz 2×1.5GB GDDR5
64


AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition
1000MHz/1050MHz/6.0GHz 3GB GDDR5
58.8


AMD Radeon HD 7970
925MHz/5.5GHz 3GB GDDR5
54.7


AMD Radeon HD 5970
2x725MHz/4GHz 1GB GDDR5
53.3


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
1006MHz/6.006GHz 2GB GDDR5
50.2


AMD Radeon HD 7950 w/Boost
850MHz/925MHz/5.5GHz 3GB GDDR5
49. 4


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
915MHz/6.006GHz 2GB GDDR5
48


AMD Radeon HD 7950
800MHz/5GHz 3GB GDDR5
47.7


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
772MHz/1544MHz/4.0GHz 1.5GB GDDR5
41.7


AMD Radeon HD 7870
1000MHz/4.8GHz 2GB GDDR5
39.9


AMD Radeon HD 6970
880MHz/5.5GHz 2GB GDDR5
39.1


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
915MHz/6. 006GHz 2GB GDDR5
38.8


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
980MHz/6.006GHz 2GB GDDR5
37.1


AMD Radeon HD 7850
860MHz/4.8GHz 2GB GDDR5
35.4


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
732MHz/1464MHz/3.8GHz 1.25GB GDDR5
35.2


AMD Radeon HD 6950
800MHz/5.0GHz 2GB GDDR5
34.8


AMD Radeon HD 5870
850MHz/4.8GHz 1GB GDDR5
33. 2


AMD Radeon HD 6870
900MHz/4.2GHz 1GB GDDR5
30.4


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
822MHz/1644MHz/4.008GHz 1GB GDDR5
29.7


AMD Radeon HD 5850
725MHz/4.0GHz 1GB GDDR5
27.9


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
607MHz/1215MHz/3.348GHz 1.25 GDDR5
27.5


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
810MHz/1620MHz/4.004GHz 1GB GDDR5
26.5


AMD Radeon HD 6850
775MHz/4GHz 1GB GDDR5
26. 2


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
925MHz/5.4GHz 1GB GDDR5
23.7


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 1GB
675MHz/1350MHz/3.6GHz 1GB GDDR5
23.1


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
648MHz/1476MHz/2.484GHz 1GB GDDR3
21.5


AMD Radeon HD 7770
1000MHz/4.5GHz 1GB GDDR5
20.7


AMD Radeon HD 5770
850MHz/4.8GHz 1GB GDDR5
18.7


AMD Radeon HD 4870
750MHz/3. 6GHz 1GB GDDR5
18.6


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
1058MHz/5GHz 1GB GDDR5
17.8


AMD Radeon HD 7750
800MHz/4.5GHz 1GB GDDR5
17.7


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
900MHz/1800MHz/4.104GHz 1GB GDDR5
17.7


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
576MHz/1242MHz/2GHz 896MB GDDR3
17.2


AMD Radeon HD 5750
700MHz/4.6GHz 1GB GDDR5
16. 2

Apex Legends Video Card Benchmark & Best GPUs at 1080p, 1440p, 4K | GamersNexus

Bench Components









 

Component

Courtesy of

CPU

Intel i7-8086K 5.0GHz

GamersNexus

GPU

This is what we’re testing!

Often the company that makes the card, but sometimes us (see article)

Motherboard

ASUS ROG Maximus X Hero

ASUS

RAM

Corsair Vengeance LPX 32GB 3200MHz

Corsair

PSU

Corsair AX1600i

Corsair

Cooler

NZXT Kraken X62

NZXT

SSD

Plextor 256-M7VC
Crucial MX300 1TB

GamersNexus

The latest drivers were used as of 2/19/19. GPUs tested:

  1. NVIDIA RTX 2080 Ti

  2. MSI RTX 2080 Trio

  3. EVGA RTX 2070 XC

  4. Gigabyte RTX 2060

  5. EVGA GTX 1080 Ti FTW3

  6. EVGA GTX 1060 6GB SC

  7. EVGA GTX 980 Ti Hybrid

  8. EVGA GTX 970 SC

  9. AMD Radeon VII

  10. AMD RX Vega 56

  11. XFX RX 590

  12. MSI RX 580 8GB Gaming X

  13. Gigabyte RX 570 4GB

  14. AMD Fury X

The following is the script from our video. If you prefer reading, carry on, but when you encounter references to “on screen” or video footage, check the video above.

Research & Practice Mode – Apex Legends

The most important thing to do before embarking on testing dozens of configurations is to establish some level of reproducible result within the game. Multiplayer is clearly where everyone is playing, but the map is huge: It has desert regions, grassy and mountainous regions, it has a river with semi-flooded buildings, and there’s the initial drop from the sky with a fuller view of everything. Framerate is all over the place in this game, which makes it functionally impossible to benchmark with full accuracy to absolute numbers. Just switching through clips in our video, you can see how varied the environments are. The best we can do is establish a reliable benchmark that gives accurate relative performance scaling, determining “best” choices in each price category, rather than try to look at absolute performance everywhere in the game.

Let’s start with a study of 4K performance to see consistency from match-to-match. We’ll look at frametime plots after we get through the framerate graphs.

With the 1080 Ti and 4K settings at High, we observed an average FPS of 47 when dropping into the match, with framerate primarily driven downward when looking over the landscape at a glancing angle. Viewing angles perpendicular to the ground boosted framerates significantly – not shown here – but wider views of the landscape and horizon drove FPS down to about 47FPS AVG. For 5 minutes in the hills and burned forest, we monitored framerate at about 60FPS AVG, with lows at 45FPS 1% and 39FPS 0. 1%. This was just coincidentally 60FPS averaged (Vsync and adaptive sync were both disabled). In some areas of play, as we’ll show in frametime plots, we saw spikes up to 70-80FPS AVG, with lows never falling much below 52FPS AVG. It appears that the framerate range is relatively constant when the GPU is stressed this heavily, but our follow-up 1080p testing will demonstrate that framerate is less consistent when strain is removed from the pixel processing pipeline.

Finally, testing with practice mode instead of multiplayer, we see that our framerate shoots high – we’re at 73FPS AVG instead of the 47-60FPS range. Ultimately, we’d deem the drop FPS to be of minimal concern as that only happens once per game and slight settings adjustments to view distance and LOD scaling can assist in this. The 60-range is what we’re looking for to see most accuracy to multiplayer. 73FPS is close – it’s within reason, really – but it’s clearly not realistic. This is a 20% performance gap, and even ignoring that, there’s still the question of whether other cards scale accurately in practice mode. The answer is “no,” as we’ll prove to you later, and so we ultimately abandoned practice mode and instead went for multiplayer testing. With multiplayer, as long as testing is conducted in exactly the same spot every time, it is accurate from run-to-run and game-to-game. The testing only deviates and becomes variable when testing in random locations. As long as control is exercised, multiplayer is a much better test environment for accurate data. It’s ultimately the landscape and prefab objects that impact performance, not necessarily the players, and testing paths can just avoid players to solve that concern.

At 1080p, the initial drops plot between 126FPS AVG and 137FPS AVG, with that difference primarily emerging from whether we looked straight down or with a wider viewing angle of the horizon. Our two 5-minute test passes covered the entire map, plotting between 162FPS AVG and 182FPS AVG, with lows functionally equal between each. The equality between lows is good for testing and shows that few actions within the game cause severe drops. Still, though, the difference between these two numbers allows the 2nd test pass a 12% improvement over the first. That’s a big leap, and clearly illustrates that just randomly testing on the multiplayer map is not sufficient for a like-for-like comparison. Practice mode also poses a problem, with even our heavier load practice testing landing at 206FPS AVG. This ranks it as 13% ahead of the fastest gameplay test – not unreasonable, really – or 27% ahead of the slower test. That’s where the real challenge is.

For these reasons, we’re going with multiplayer testing in a controlled area with heavy load, using the river region of the map. This will give us data that best represents the real gameplay experience, but remains controllable for variables and reproducible in testing.

Apex Legends Frametimes

For 1080p frametimes between the two in-game test passes, we get the chart being drawn now. Remember that frametimes are representative of frame-to-frame interval, so we’re looking at about 50,000 frames of data here and trying to keep an eye out for spikes above the mean. Spikes greater than 8-12ms become noticeable to the player as a spike. Consistency is most important, with low frametime being the next most important. These two tests were actual gameplay sessions without deaths for 5 minutes, with no particular mind paid to specific test paths. They were tested in different regions of the game. As you can see, playing as a real player would, the two actually don’t deviate all that much from one another in frametime. The red line is spikier on average, which leads to the worse overall average FPS. It also climbs above the blue line toward the beginning, where we start hitting 10-12ms while blue is still at 6-8ms frametimes.

Both of these are completely acceptable, of course, but the point is to show how those earlier averages are created, and that the game has some natural variance depending on type of play encountered. Simulating this play in a realistic fashion is impossible – you can’t get exactly the same test path each time in multiplayer, and so singleplayer remains our current best option for consistency. A reliable test is more important than a random test that seems closer to real gameplay, because then we can’t fairly judge one card versus another. We’ll just have to keep in mind that the absolute numbers displayed in the upcoming charts need to be considered lower for actual multiplayer; instead, we suggest focusing on the relative scaling.

Apex Legends 1080p & High Settings Benchmark

Finally getting into the results, here’s 1080p with multiplayer testing near the river part of the map, where we see medium to heavy load without introducing one-off load inducers like grenades – more on that after the charts. Further, note that we disabled the framerate limit completely.

The 2080 Ti ends up at about 161FPS AVG, with the Radeon VII card shockingly close at 153FPS AVG. We didn’t trust these numbers, so reran both devices again, then reran a different 2080 Ti a third time for parity. At the end, the numbers repeated. The Radeon VII card falls off hard as resolution increases, curiously and counter to what one might expect with its memory bandwidth, but this game does seem to run well on it at 1080p when compared to the 2080 Ti. We may be bumping into a bit of a framerate limit on the CPU at 1080p, but our peak FPS numbers do post at 240FPS and above, so those spikes won’t be shaved too short. There may be some heavy draw call regions that are more CPU-intensive, but on average, we are reasonably distant from the FPS bottleneck. Radeon VII seems to do well here.

The 2080 Trio ends up at 145FPS AVG, allowing the 2080 Ti a lead of 11%, with the Radeon VII leading by 5%. The 1080 Ti is further behind the 2080 than it has been in other titles, ending up at 128FPS AVG to 145FPS of the 2080, producing a gap of 13%, favoring the 2080, and matching the 2070 in performance. For this title, it seems that an RX 580 with a light overclock – i.e. an RX 590 – or an RTX 2060 would be good, modern-day options for the mid-range to upper mid-range price categories. The 980 Ti still holds on well, ranking at 80FPS AVG with 1080p/High settings, and the 970 seems to do alright. Remember that settings can be dropped below what we’re running to further improve performance. The Fury X ends up with frametime consistency issues, as does the RX 570, where both have low framerates dropping below the mean distance against the average.

Apex Legends 1440p GPU Benchmark: RTX 2080 vs. Radeon VII, Vega 56, GTX 970, & More

1440p has the 2080 Ti at about 124FPS AVG, so we see uplift of about 62% over the AVG FPS of our upcoming 4K numbers. The low performance is still consistent and good on the 2080 Ti, with frametimes on average within a few milliseconds of each other. The 2080 Ti runs 12.7% ahead of the RTX 2080, which runs about 3.4% ahead of the Radeon VII card. This is about within the performance range that we observed for the Radeon VII in our initial review. As for the rest, the 2060 seems to be a line of division against the lower-end of the charts, offering a good upgrade pathway for those wanting to play Apex Legends at 1440p with high settings. 82FPS AVG with lows around 60FPS is widely acceptable performance. Interestingly, we see big performance hits on the Fury X and RX 570, where the limited VRAM of the Fury X seems to cause a massive hit to frametime consistency, dropping lows to 22FPS 0. 1% and 36FPS 1%. The RX 570 experiences similar behavior. The GTX 970 does not seem to encounter this same impact, but we believe that’s because it’s so strained elsewhere in the pipeline that memory is less of an issue. The card has trouble running at even 30FPS AVG for 1440p/High.

Apex Legends 4K Benchmark — RTX 2080 Ti vs. RTX 2080, 1080 Ti

At 4K/High, the 2080 Ti ends up at 76FPS AVG, ranked about 16% ahead of the RTX 2080 Trio and 34% ahead of the Radeon VII. The 2080 ends up 16% ahead of the Radeon VII card, which is functionally tied with the 1080 Ti. Interestingly, in this game, we actually do see the 2080 placing reasonably above the 1080 Ti. In our launch testing, the 2080 was closer to parity with the 1080 Ti in just about every game, and sometimes falling behind. Here, the 2080 leads the 1080 Ti. Speaking of parity, the RTX 2070 isn’t far behind the 1080 Ti in this testing, with the 1080 Ti posting a lead of just 3.4%. This matches what we saw in the practice tests as well, although we consider those tests invalid for wider performance analytics due to scaling limitations.

The RTX 2070 leads the 2060 by about 20%, and at this point, we’d probably recommend the 2060 drop to much lower settings or to 1440p. The 2070 does OK, but in a fast-paced game like Apex Legends, it’d probably also benefit from a slight settings reduction. Vega 56 struggles to keep pace here, although its frametime performance is consistently good in this title, so for that it gets praise. The R9 Fury X ends up behind Vega 56, with lows dropping off to inconsistency, likely a result of the 4GB limitations. The Fury X also ends up roughly tied with the aging and once-king 980 Ti, which is just 8% ahead of the XFX RX 590.

Clearly, these cards are not really meant for 4K gaming, but some of them could be made to play Apex Legends at nearing 60FPS with enough graphics quality reductions – it’d probably be better to just play at 1440p, though.

Grenades

These numbers are accurate for multiplayer use on average, so can be used reliably even for relatively absolute testing. That will become less true if patches launch or the game changes significantly, but for now, they can be used as both absolute and relative performance scaling numbers. This becomes a bit less true in the absolute most load-intensive scenarios, but for the vast majority of the multiplayer experience, the numbers are a good representation of performance. One example of where our numbers would no longer be reliable as an absolute metric would be if involved in very heavy combat where multiple grenades are going off. As an example, the incendiary grenades that we tested in practice mode, where you have an infinite amount of them, would drop framerate by roughly 23% when detonating several in sequence. That’s a big performance hit and isn’t accounted for in our charts, so keep that in mind for decision making. If you want to be sure that things hit a specific FPS target in all scenarios, including high incendiary grenade counts, factor-in another 20% drop to FPS. To be fair, this is not going to be a commonly encountered scenario, but it’s an important one to know about.

Example of Practice Benchmark’s Poor Scaling (Invalid Test Path)

Finally, here’s what a Practice mode test would look like. Let’s first firmly note that this is invalid data – we’ll mark the chart that way, too, since people will otherwise paste it everywhere without listening and just assume it to be accurate. This data is valid only to practice mode, but does not scale well to multiplayer when looking at relative performance card-to-card. One good example is the Fury X: In multiplayer, we ran into frametime consistency issues as a result of memory limitations, but those limitations did not emerge in the much more limited practice mode. This is a huge difference in play experience, even ignoring the higher average FPS. The next difference is the 2080 TI, where we see nearly 300FPS in practice, but about half of that in multiplayer. Even if scaling were perfect card-to-card – which it isn’t – there is a point at which it’s so far from reality that the numbers are no longer useful.

This scaling is way off. The Radeon VII, for example, ends up nowhere close to where it should land, the 2080 Ti does uncharacteristically well versus even the 2080, the Fury X isn’t suffering like it should, and so forth. Some numbers, like the 580 versus the 1060, are actually relatively representative of reality, but are still flawed. Going forward, we will only test with our multiplayer test path, as the practice mode is simply not representative of play. We hope that Apex Legends introduces a replay mode for easier testing, assuming it’s accurate.

Conclusion

Apex Legends is relatively lightweight to run at high settings, despite having some very taxing scenes. Heavy incendiary grenades will tank FPS, but are also rare to really stack-up in actual multiplayer gaming. The drop-in is also intensive if looking toward the horizon (longer view distances), but that only happens once per game. Overall, then, that leaves us with gameplay on the ground, and it’s overall playable on just about everything in the ~$150 and up class at 1080p/High. There’s more room for FPS increases if settings are lowered, of course, but High settings are not that intensive.

Editorial, Test Lead: Steve Burke
Additional Testing: Patrick Lathan
Video: Andrew Coleman

RX 580 with i7-7700K benchmarks in Ultra quality settings

Compare with
Select..AMD Radeon HD 6850 — RUB 13,052AMD Radeon HD 6870 — RUB 13,052AMD Radeon HD 6950 — RUB 16,398AMD Radeon HD 6970 — RUB 19,619 ₽ 45,847AMD Radeon HD 7750 — ₽ 9,183AMD Radeon HD 7750M — ₽ 56,276AMD Radeon HD 7790 — ₽ 9,773AMD Radeon HD 7850 — ₽ 16,332AMD Radeon HD 7850M — ₽ 63,229AMD Radeon HD 7 AMD7 AMD7 795050M — RUB 67,099 AMD Radeon HD 7970 — RUB 19,611 AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition — RUB 19,611 Radeon R5 — RUB 45,979AMD Radeon R7 250 — RUB 6,231AMD Radeon R7 265 — RUB 9,773AMD Radeon R7 370 — RUB 13,249AMD Radeon R9 270 — RUB 18,037AMD Radeon R9 280 — RUB 22,957AMD Radeon R9,290 285 — ₽ 24,924AMD Radeon R9 290 — ₽ 20,333AMD Radeon R9 290X — ₽ 26,170AMD Radeon R9 295X2 — ₽ 9AMD Radeon R9 380 — RUB 19,611AMD Radeon R9 380X — RUB 15,020AMD Radeon R9 390 — RUB 30,499AMD Radeon R9 390X — RUB 32,467AMD Radeon R9 FURY — RUB 36,099AMD Radeon R9 -FURY X — RUB 58D 66,639AMD Radeon R9 M280X — ₽ 70,181AMD Radeon R9 M280X 2GB — ₽ 70,181AMD Radeon R9 M290X — ₽ 79,298AMD Radeon R9 M380 — ₽ 70,444AMD Radeon R9 Nano — ₽ 100,287AMD Radeon RX 460 — ₽ 9,183AMD Radeon RX 470 — ₽ 22,432AMD Radeon RX 470 Mobile — ₽ 78,905AMD Radeon RX 480 — ₽ 26,170AMD Radeon RX 480 Mobile — ₽ 83,627AMD Radeon RX 540 Mobile — ₽ 42,306AMD Radeon RX 550 — ₽ 4,854AMD Radeon RX 550 Mobile — ₽ 4,854AMD Radeon RX 550 Mobile0,5 5500 XT 4GB — RUB 11,085AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB — RUB 13,052AMD Radeon RX 550X Mobile — RUB 60,540AMD Radeon RX 560 — RUB 6. 493AMD Radeon RX 560 Mobile — $64,737AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT — $18,300AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile — $42,043AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile 2GB — $64,737 RX 5700 — RUB 22,891AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT — RUB 26,170AMD Radeon RX 580 Mobile — RUB 85,726AMD Radeon RX 580X Mobile — RUB 85,726AMD Radeon RX 590 — RUB 14,036AMD Radeon RX 6600 RX4 XT4 — RUB 85D AMD Radeon RX 6800 — RUB 37,977 AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT — RUB 42,568 AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT — $65,524AMD Radeon RX VEGA 10 — $41,453AMD ​​Radeon RX VEGA 3 — $37,190AMD Radeon RX VEGA 6 — $73,395AMD Radeon RX VEGA 8 — $39,420AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 — $17.64 Radeon RX Vega 56 — $17.64 Mobile — ₽ 103,567AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 — ₽ 27,482AMD Radeon VII — ₽ 43,552ATI Radeon HD 4870 — ₽ 19,611NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 — ₽ 5,182NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 — ₽ 5,182NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 — ₽ 13,052NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 — ₽ 8,461NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q — ₽ 84,086NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile — ₽ 49,193NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 2GB — ₽ 69,657NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti — ₽ 8,461NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q — ₽ 83,299NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile — ₽ 57,457NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB — ₽ 11,150NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB — ₽ 10,429NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q — ₽ 77,724NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile — ₽ 64,737NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 — ₽ 21,579NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q — ₽ 72,543NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile — ₽ 102,255NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti — $32,992NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 — $34,238NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q — $128,229NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile — ₽ 121,801NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti — ₽ 52,931NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 — ₽ 9,773NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q — ₽ 81,266NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile — ₽ 75,494NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER — ₽ 10,494NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 — ₽ 14,430NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER — ₽ 15,020NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti — ₽ 18,300NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q — ₽ 77,724NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile — ₽ 115,307NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 — ₽ 29,450NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 — ₽ 19,611NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 — ₽ 42,568NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 — ₽ 16,332NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 — ₽ 19,611NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 — ₽ 32,729NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti — ₽ 13,052NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 — ₽ 10,035NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti — ₽ 14,430NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 — ₽ 22,891NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 — ₽ 26,170NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 — ₽ 45,847NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 — ₽ 3,214NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti — ₽ 4,198NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost — ₽ 11,085NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 — ₽ 5,182NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti — ₽ 19,611NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M — ₽ 64,737NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 — ₽ 5,182NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M — ₽ 69,394NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX — ₽ 69,394NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 — ₽ 31,811NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M — ₽ 71,034NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 — ₽ 28,794 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti — ₽ 18,300NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 — ₽ 20,989NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M — ₽ 67,951NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 — ₽ 11,741NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M — ₽ 72,149NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 — ₽ 23,285NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti — ₽ 26,892NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M — ₽ 76,216NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M — ₽ 76,216NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 — ₽ 5,838NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 — ₽ 5,838NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M — ₽ 69,919NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 — ₽ 29,450NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M — ₽ 81,922NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M 6GB — ₽ 81,922NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 — ₽ 16,332NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Mobile — ₽ 88,219NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti — ₽ 40,600NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M — ₽ 88,219NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980MX — ₽ 88,219NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN — ₽ 42,634NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK — ₽ 65,524NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X — ₽ 72,083 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 — $22. 891NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile — ₽ 72,411NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER — ₽ 26,236NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 — ₽ 30,762NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q — ₽ 99,434NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile — ₽ 113,077NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER — ₽ 32,729NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 — ₽ 45,454NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q — ₽ 116,226NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile — ₽ 127,376NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER — ₽ 45,847NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti — ₽ 77,855NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 — ₽ 13,118NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti — $16,332NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 — $21,579NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti — ₽ 26,170NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 — ₽ 32,729NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti — ₽ 39,288NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 — ₽ 45,847NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti — ₽ 52,406NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 — ₽ 98,319NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 — ₽ 13,118NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 — ₽ 21,579NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti — ₽ 26,170NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 — ₽ 32,729NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 — ₽ 45,847NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti — ₽ 52,406NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 — ₽ 98,319NVIDIA TITAN RTX — $163,909NVIDIA TITAN V — $196,704NVIDIA TITAN Xp — RUB 78,642

Change CPU to
Select. .AMD Athlon 5000 Dual-Core — RUB 6555.7AMD Athlon 5200 Dual-Core — RUB 1967AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+ — RUB 8523.4 — RUB 23609.1AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4800+ — RUB 30168.1AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+ — RUB 21742.4AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+ — RUB 3482.2AMD Athlon 64 X4 Dual Core 5400+ — RUB 3482.2AMD Athlon 64 X4 Dual Core 5400+ — RUB X2 Dual Core 5600+ — RUB 9835.2AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5800+ — RUB 1639.1AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+ — RUB 3013.9AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6400+ — RUB 17050.1AMD Athlon 7550 Dual-Core — RUB 3935.4 AMD Athlon Dual Core 5000B — $ 6231.1AMD Athlon II X2 215 — $ 786.4AMD Athlon II X2 220 — $ 2111.3 II X2 255 — RUB 4277.8AMD Athlon II X2 260 — RUB 1311.1AMD Athlon II X2 265 — RUB 5436.1AMD Athlon II X2 270 — RUB 1573.5AMD Athlon II X2 B22 — RUB 2358AMD Athlon II X2AMD II2 X20. — ₽ 3217.2AMD Athlon II X3 425 — ₽ 6835.1AMD Athlon II X3 435 — ₽ 3278.8AMD Athlon II X3 440 — ₽ 3079.5AMD ATHLON II X3 445 — ₽ 5968.7AMD athlon II X3 450 — ₽ 2622. 9AMD ATHLON II X3 455 — ₽ 7664.2AMD ATHLON II X3 460 — ₽ 3278.8AMD ATHO X4 620 — ₽ 3932.1AMD ATHLON 28 Athlon II X4 631 Quad-Core — $ 5247.2AMD Athlon II X4 635 — $ 4588AMD Athlon II X4 640 — $ 5243.9AMD Athlon II X4 641 Quad-Core — $ 6001.5 — ₽ 18168.4AMD Athlon X4 760K Quad Core — ₽ 3017.1AMD Athlon X4 840 — ₽ 5164.6AMD Athlon X4 845 — ₽ 3278.8AMD Athlon X4 860K — ₽ 4196.4AMD ATHLON X4 870K — ₽ 5246.5AMD Athlon X4 880K — ₽ 5902.4AMD ATHLON X4 950 — ₽ 3934.7AMD E2-3200 APU — ₽ 524.1AMD FX -4100 Quad -Core — ₽ 8526AMD FX -4130 QUAD -₽ 4984. FX-4170 Quad-Core — RUB 6558.3AMD FX-4200 Quad-Core — RUB 14968.3AMD FX-4300 Quad-Core — RUB 3501.9AMD FX-4350 Quad-Core — RUB 8526AMD FX-6200 Six-Core — RUB 22297.3FX -6300 Six-Core — RUB 3869.2AMD FX-6350 Six-Core — RUB 8526AMD FX-8120 Eight-Core — RUB 6558.3AMD FX-8150 Eight-Core — RUB 25153.8AMD FX-8300 Eight-Core — RUB 5285.9AMD 8320 Eight-Core — ₽ 5214.4AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core — ₽ 6484.9AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core — RUB 5246.5 AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core — RUB 8853. 3AMD FX-8370E Eight-Core — RUB 11805.5 Phenom 8250e Triple-Core — ₽ 3082.1AMD Phenom 8450 Triple-Core — ₽ 1964.4AMD Phenom 8600 Triple-Core — ₽ 3475.6AMD Phenom 8600B Triple-Core — ₽ 3475.6AMD Phenom 8650 Triple-Core — ₽ 3278.8AMD Phenom 9100e Quad-Core — ₽ 2620.3AMD Phenom 9150e Quad-Core — ₽ 2620.3AMD Phenom 9350e Quad-Core — ₽ 221830AMD Phenom 9450e Quad-Core — ₽ 6887AMD Phenom 9500 Quad-Core — ₽ 3934.7AMD Phenom 9550 Quad-Core — ₽ 2620.3AMD Phenom 9600 Quad-Core — ₽ 3276.2AMD Phenom 9600B Quad-Core — ₽ 9654.2AMD Phenom 9650 Quad-Core — ₽AMD-Core 360 ₽ 3932.1AMD Phenom 9850 Quad -Core — ₽ 3279.5AMD Phenom 9950 Quad -Core — ₽ 11804.9AMD Phenom II X2 545 — ₽ 2884.6AMD Phenom II X2 550 — ₽ 3278.8AMD PHENOM II X2 555 — ₽ 9323AMD PEN 1967AMD Phenom II X2 B550.6AMD Phenom II X3 B73 — ₽ 4919.3AMD Phenom II X4 805 — ₽ 11412AMD Phenom II X4 810 — ₽ 7607.8AMD Phenom II X4 820 — ₽ 4916AMD Phenom II X4 840 — ₽ 5899.8AMD Phenom II X4 905E — ₽ 13 905E — ₽ 13 910 — ₽ 65559AMD Phenom II X4 910e — ₽ 10297AMD Phenom II X4 920 — ₽ 4393. 9AMD Phenom II X4 925 — ₽ 10493.7AMD Phenom II X4 940 — ₽ 7870.1AMD PHENOM II X4 945 — ₽ 3278.8AMD Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd AMD Phenom II X4 960T — RUB 8854 AMD Phenom II X4 965 — RUB 3902.6AMD Phenom II X4 B95 — RUB 4784.8AMD Phenom II X4 B97 — ₽ 5899.8AMD Phenom II X6 1035T — ₽ 12396.5AMD Phenom II X6 1045T — ₽ 11478.3AMD Phenom II X6 1055T — ₽ 12134.2AMD Phenom II X6 1075T — ₽ 17052.7AMD PHENOM II X6 1090T — ₽ 259978.90T — ₽ 259978.90T ₽ 13117.3AMD Phenom X3 8550 — ₽ 11147AMD RYZEN 3 1200 — ₽ 6230.4AMD RYZEN 3 1300X — ₽ 8198.1AMD RYZEN 3 2200G — ₽ 6427.2AMD RYZEN 3 3100 — ₽ 5903.1AMD RYZEN 3 3200G — ₽ 6493.4AMD RYZEN 3300 — AMD Ryzen 5 1400 — $ 8789.1AMD Ryzen 5 1500X — $ 9503.3AMD Ryzen 5 1600 — $ 10165.8AMD Ryzen 5 1600X — $ 11701.3837.8AMD RYZEN 5 2600X — ₽ 13773.2AMD RYZEN 5 3400G — ₽ 9837.8AMD RYZEN 5 3500 — ₽ 9707.3AMD RYZEN 5 3500X — ₽ 10527.2AMD RYZEN 5 3600 — ₽ 13052.4AMD RYZEN 5 3600X — ₽ 16331. AMD RYZEN 5 5600X — ₽ 19611.4AMD RYZEN 7 1700 — ₽ 12461.4AMD RYZEN 7 1700X — ₽ 13117.3AMD RYZEN 7 1800X — ₽ 16396.8AMD RYZEN 7 2700 — ₽ 16347AMD RYZEN 7 2700X — ₽ 20004.3AMD RYZEN 7, 3700X — ₽ ₽ ₽ ¦ 3800X — RUB 26170.4AMD Ryzen 7 5700X — RUB 19676.3AMD Ryzen 7 5800X — RUB 26170.4AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D — RUB 29514.8AMD Ryzen 9 3900X — ₽ 32729.4AMD Ryzen 9 3950X — ₽ 49192.5AMD Ryzen 9 5900X — ₽ 32729.4AMD Ryzen 9 5950X — ₽ 46568.9AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X — ₽ 22955.8AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X — ₽ 27547.1AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X — ₽ 44600.5 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X — ₽ 59030.3AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX — ₽ 112814.1Intel Core i3-10100 — ₽ 8002Intel Core i3-10300 — ₽ 9379.4Intel Core i3-11100 — ₽ 8002Intel Core i3-11300 — ₽ 9379.4Intel Core i3-12100 — ₽ 8002Intel Core i3-12300 — ₽ 9379.4Intel Core i3-2100 @ 3.10GHz — ₽ 3934.7Intel Core i3-2102 @ 3.10GHz — RUB 3804.2Intel Core i3-2105 @ 3.10GHz — RUB 5246.5Intel Core i3-2120 @ 3.30GHz — RUB 1967.7Intel Core i3-2125 @ 3.30GHz — RUB 13052. 2Intel Core0 @ 3.40GHz — RUB 4590.6Intel Core i3-3210 @ 3.20GHz — RUB 6558.3Intel Core i3-3220 @ 3.30GHz — RUB 2289.1Intel Core i3-3225 @ 3.30GHz — RUB 6558.3Intel Core i3-3240 @ 3.40GHz — RUB 1 Intel Core i3-3245 @ 3.40GHz — $ 5246.5 Intel Core i3-3250 @ 3.50GHz — $ 6230.4 Intel Core i3-4130 @ 3.40GHz — $ 9181.9 3.60GHz — ₽ 9181.9Intel Core i3-4170 @ 3.70GHz — Rs. 9837.8Intel Core i3-4330 @ 3.50GHz — Rs. 11805.5Intel Core i3-4340 @ 3.60GHz — Rs. @ 3.70GHz — RUB 18361.9Intel Core i3-4370 @ 3.80GHz — RUB 29513.5Intel Core i3-530 @ 2.93GHz — RUB 1311.8Intel Core i3-540 @ 3.07GHz — RUB 1377.4Intel Core i3-550 @ 3.20GHz — RUB Intel Core i3-560 @ 3.33GHz — RUB 1966.4Intel Core i3-6098P @ 3.60GHz — RUB 8772Intel Core i3-6100 @ 3.70GHz — RUB 10895.2Intel Core i3-6300 @ 3.80GHz — RUB 9Intel Core i3-7320 @ 3.90GHz Intel Core i3-8100 @ 3.60GHz — RUB 8526 i3-9100F @ 3.60GHz — $ 6886.3Intel Core i3-9320 @ 3.70GHz — $ 10625.6Intel Core i3-9350KF @ 4.00GHz — $ 14691.537.4Intel Core i5-10600K — $15533. 7Intel Core i5-11400 — $11937.4Intel Core i5-11600K — $17184.6Intel Core i5-12400 — $9379.4Intel Core i5-12600K — $19.05GHz ₽ 5246.5Intel Core i5-2310 @ 2.90GHz — ₽ 5245.9Intel Core i5-2320 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 12806.4Intel Core i5-2380P @ 3.10GHz — ₽ 5902.4Intel Core i5-2400 @ 3.10GHz — ₽ tel5 Core508.9 2400S @ 2.50GHz — RUB 4309.3 Intel Core i5-2405S @ 2.50GHz — RUB 10783 Intel Core i5-2450P @ 3.20GHz — RUB 5902.4 Intel Core i5-2500 @ 3.30GHz — RUB 6886.3 Intel Core i5-2500S @ 2.70GHz — ₽ 4918.6Intel Core i5-2550K @ 3.40GHz — Rs. 8526Intel Core i5-3330 @ 3.00GHz — Rs. 6558.3Intel Core i5-3330S @ 2.70GHz — Rs. 2.80GHz — $ 9837.8 Intel Core i5-3350P @ 3.10GHz — $ 11149.6 Intel Core i5-3450 @ 3.10GHz — $ 8394.9 Intel Core i5-3470S @ 2.90GHz — RUB 9188.5 Intel Core i5-3475S @ 2.90GHz — RUB 9412.2 GHz — ₽ 9181.9Intel Core i5-3570K @ 3.40GHz — RUB 9444.3Intel Core i5-3570S @ 3.10GHz — RUB 18693.2Intel Core i5-4430 @ 3.00GHz — RUB 11805.5Intel Core i5-4430S @ 2.70-44Intel Core i5-4430S @ 2.70-44Intel Core05 @ 3. 10GHz — $ 11149.6Intel Core i5-4440S @ 2.80GHz — $ 30366.2Intel Core i5-4460 @ 3.20GHz — $ 11149.6Intel Core i5-4460S @ 2.90GHz — $ 43288.7 Intel Core i5-4570S @ 2.90GHz — $14536.7 Intel Core i5-4590 @ 3.30GHz — $12133.5Intel Core i5-4590S @ 3.00GHz — $12986.2 3.40GHz — ₽ 16396.8Intel Core i5-4670R @ 3.00GHz — Rs. 18102.8Intel Core i5-4690 @ 3.50GHz — Rs. 13117.3Intel Core i5-4690K @ 3.50GHz — Rs. @ 3.10GHz — $ 26235.3 Intel Core i5-6400 @ 2.70GHz — $ 13117.3 Intel Core i5-6402P @ 2.80GHz — $ 12461.4 Intel Core i5-650 @ 3.20GHz — $ 6558.3 Intel Core i5-655K @ 3.20GHz — RUB 3934.7 Intel Core i5-660 @ 3.33GHz — RUB 3213.9 Intel Core i5-6600 @ 3.30GHz — RUB 14429.148.3Intel Core i5-661 @ 3.33GHz — Rs. 6558.3Intel Core i5-670 @ 3.47GHz — Rs. 5902.4Intel Core i5-680 @ 3.60GHz — Rs. @ 2.67GHz — $ 10527.2 Intel Core i5-7500 @ 3.40GHz — $ 13773.2 Intel Core i5-760 @ 2.80GHz — $ 6558.3 ​​Intel Core i5-7600 @ 3.50GHz — $ 15739.6 Intel Core i5-7640X @ 4.00GHz — $16396.8 Intel Core i5-8400 @ 2.80GHz — $13117. 3Intel Core i5-8500 @ 3.00GHz — $15676 GHz — ₽ 24770.1Intel Core i5-9400 @ 2.90GHz — $ 11149.6Intel Core i5-9400F @ 2.90GHz — $ 11149.6Intel Core i5-9600K @ 3.70GHz — $ 18364.5 i7-11700K — $ 26891.9Intel Core i7-12700K — $ 30826.6Intel Core i7-2600 @ 3.40GHz — $ 9837.2 -2700K @ 3.50GHz — $13117.3Intel Core i7-3770 @ 3.40GHz — $11740Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.50GHz — $16330.6Intel Core i7-3770S @ 3.10GHz — $13117.3Intel Core i7-3820 13117.3Intel Core i7-3930K @ 3.20GHz — RUB 26169.1Intel Core i7-3960X @ 3.30GHz — RUB 52471.3Intel Core i7-3970X @ 3.50GHz — RUB 62572.2Intel Core i7-4770 @ 3.40GHz — RUB 15740.9Intel Core i7-4770K 20tel Core135 3.20GHz — RUB 22470.5 Intel Core i7-4820K @ 3.70GHz — RUB 32794.3 Intel Core i7-4930K @ 3.40GHz — RUB 26169.1514.8Intel Core i7-5820K @ 3.30GHz — RUB 19676.3Intel Core i7-5930K @ 3.50GHz — RUB 32728.1Intel Core i7-5960X @ 3.00GHz — RUB 50503.6Intel Core i7-6700 @ 3.40GHz — RUB 28Intel Core06.4 @ 4.00GHz — RUB 21972Intel Core i7-6800K @ 3.40GHz — RUB 27547. 1Intel Core i7-6850K @ 3.60GHz — RUB 36073.8Intel Core i7-6900K @ 3.20GHz — RUB 78706.7Intel Core i7-6900K @ 3.20GHz — RUB 78706.7Intel Core i7-6950X @ 3.0GHz Intel Core i7-7700 @ 3.60GHz — RUB 21325.3 Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20GHz — RUB 23283.8 Intel Core i7-7740X @ 4.30GHz — RUB 22890.3 GHz — ₽ 60998Intel Core i7-8086K @ 4.00GHz — Rs. Intel Core i7-8700 @ 3.70GHz -930 @ 2.80GHz — $3934.7Intel Core i7-940 @ 2.93GHz — $4637.2Intel Core i7-950 @ 3.07GHz — $16069.6Intel Core i7-960 @ 3.20GHz — $6558.3Intel Core i7-965 @ 3.20GHz — $ 9181.9Intel Core i7-970 @ 3.20GHz — $ 9837.2Intel Core i7-9700 @ 3.00GHz — $ 21644 Intel Core i7-975 @ 3.33GHz — RUB 11805.5 Intel Core i7-980 @ 3.33GHz — RUB 13116.7 Intel Core i7-980X @ ​​3.33GHz — RUB 14428.5 ₽ 38698.1Intel Core i9-11900K — ₽ 32007.9Intel Core i9-12900K — ₽ 38697.4Intel Core i9-7900X @ 3.30GHz — ₽ 90513.5Intel Core i9-7920X @ 2.90GHz — $ 71932.6 Intel Core i9-7940X @ 3.10GHz — $ 78191.2 Intel Core i9-7960X @ 2.80GHz — $ 131179.3 i9-9900K @ 3. 60GHz — ₽ 54767Intel Core2 Duo E4300 @ 1.80GHz — ₽ 10359.9Intel Core2 Duo E4400 @ 2.00GHz — ₽ 587Intel Core2 Duo E4500 @ 2.20GHz — ₽ 2622.9Intel Core2 Duo E4600 @ 2.40GHz — ₽ 10359.9Intel Core2 Duo E4700 @ 2.60GHz — ₽ 6559Intel Core2 Duo E6300 @ 1.86GHz — ₽ 852Intel Core2 Duo E6320 @ 1.86GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Core2 Duo E6400 @ 2.13GHz — ₽ 1308.5Intel Core2 Duo E6420 @ 2.13GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Core2 Duo E6550 @ 2.33GHz — ₽ 980.6Intel Core2 Duo E6600 @ 2.40GHz — ₽ 983.2Intel Core2 Duo E6700 @ 2.66GHz — ₽ 1967Intel Core2 Duo E6750 @ 2.66GHz — ₽ 849.4Intel Core2 Duo E6850 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Core2 Duo E7200 @ 2.53GHz — ₽ 4919.3 Intel Core2 Duo E7300 @ 2.66GHz — $1311.1 Intel Core2 Duo E7400 @ 2.80GHz — $1901.5 Intel Core2 Duo E7500 @ 2.93GHz — $ 983.2 Intel Core2 Duo E8300 @ 2.83GHz — RUB 1311.1Intel Core2 Duo E8400 @ 3.00GHz — RUB 642.1Intel Core2 Duo E8500 @ 3.16GHz — RUB 2622.9Intel Core2 Duo E8600 @ 3.33GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Core2 Extreme Q6800 @ 2.93GHz — ₽ 73788.8Intel Core2 Extreme Q6850 @ 3. 00GHz — ₽ 98119.4Intel Core2 Extreme X6800 @ 2.93GHz — ₽ 17292.1Intel Core2 Extreme X9650 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 59621.3 Intel Core2 Extreme X9770 @ 3.20GHz — ₽ 105531Intel Core2 Extreme X9775 @ 3.20GHz — ₽ 118452.3Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 @ 2.40GHz — ₽ 2622.3Intel Core2 Quad Q6700 @ 2.66GHz — ₽ 2950.9Intel Core2 Quad Q8200 @ 2.33GHz — ₽ 1507.9Intel Core2 Quad Q8300 @ 2.50GHz — RUB 3278.8Intel Core2 Quad Q8400 @ 2.66GHz — RUB 6526.2Intel Core2 Quad Q9300 @ 2.50GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Core2 Quad Q9400 @ 2.66GHz — ₽ 2228.7Intel Core2 Quad Q9450 @ 2.66GHz — ₽ 21972.7Intel Core2 Quad Q9500 @ 2.83GHz — ₽ 2295Intel Core2 Quad Q9505 @ 2.83GHz — ₽ 12462.1Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 @ 2.83GHz — ₽ 3213.3Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 4576.9Intel Pentium G2010 @ 2.80GHz — ₽ 2288.4Intel Pentium G2020 @ 2.90GHz — ₽ 2155.3Intel Pentium G2030 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 2688.5Intel Pentium G2120 @ 3.10GHz — ₽ 3016.5Intel Pentium G2130 @ 3.20GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Pentium G2140 @ 3.30GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Pentium G3220 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 7867. 5Intel Pentium G3240 @ 3.10GHz — ₽ 5246.5Intel Pentium G3250 @ 3.20GHz — ₽ 7214.2Intel Pentium G3258 @ 3.20GHz — ₽ 11693.4Intel Pentium G3260 @ 3.30GHz — ₽ 6886.3Intel Pentium G3420 @ 3.20GHz — ₽ 7214.2Intel Pentium G3430 @ 3.30GHz — ₽ 5902.4Intel Pentium G3440 @ 3.30GHz — ₽ 10490.5Intel Pentium G3450 @ 3.40GHz — ₽ 6558.3Intel Pentium G3460 @ 3.50GHz — ₽ 18903Intel Pentium G3470 @ 3.60GHz — ₽ 6840.4Intel Pentium G4400 @ 3.30GHz — ₽ 5246.5Intel Pentium G4500 @ 3.50GHz — ₽ 5592.2Intel Pentium G4520 @ 3.60GHz — ₽ 7273.3Intel Pentium G4560 @ 3.50GHz — ₽ 6763.6Intel Pentium G4600 @ 3.60GHz — ₽ 6558.3Intel Pentium G4620 @ 3.70GHz — ₽ 6943.4Intel Pentium G640 @ 2.80GHz — ₽ 1639.1Intel Pentium G645 @ 2.90GHz — ₽ 6231.1Intel Pentium G840 @ 2.80GHz — ₽ 2295Intel Pentium G850 @ 2.90GHz — ₽ 1967Intel Pentium G860 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 1967Intel Pentium G870 @ 3.10GHz — ₽ 6362.2Intel Pentium Gold G5400 @ 3.70GHz — ₽ 8123.3Intel Pentium Gold G5500 @ 3.80GHz — ₽ 6580Intel Pentium Gold G5600 @ 3.90GHz — ₽ 6618

Change Variant To
Select. .AMD Radeon RX 580AREZ DUAL RX 580 4 GBAREZ DUAL RX 580 8 GBAREZ DUAL RX 580 OC 4 GBAREZ DUAL RX 580 OC 8 GBAREZ STRIX RX 580 GAMINGAREZ STRIX RX 580 GAMING OCASRock Phantom Gaming D RX 580 OC 4 GBASRock Phantom Gaming D RX 580 OC 4 GBASRock DUAL RX Phantom Gaming 580 OC 8 GBASRock Phantom Gaming M2 RX 580ASRock Phantom Gaming X RX 580 OCASUS DUAL RX 580 4 GBASUS DUAL RX 580 8 GBASUS DUAL RX 580 OC 4 GBASUS DUAL RX 580 OC 8 GBASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 8GASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 OC RX 580 OC 8GASUS ROG STRIX RX 580 GAMINGASUS ROG STRIX RX 580 GAMING OCASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 580ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 580 OCASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 580 RX 580 X-Serial 4 GBDataland RX 580 X-Serial 8 GBDataland RX 580 X-Serial God of War 4 GBDataland RX 580 X-Serial God of War 8 GBDiamond RX 580GIGABYTE AORUS RX 580 4 GBGIGABYTE AORUS RX 580 8 GBGIGABYTE RX 580GIGABYTE RX 580 GAMING 4 GBGIGABYTE RX 580 GAMING 8 GBGIGABYTE RX 580 GAMING Mining 4 GBGIGABYTE RX 580 GAMING Mining 8 GBGIGABYTE RX 580 Gaming BoxHIS RX 580 IceQ X2 OC 4 GBHIS RX 580 IceQ X2 OC 8 GBHIS RX 580 IceQ X2 TurboKUROTOSHIKOU RX 580MAXSUN RX 580 JetStreamMSI RX 580MSI RX 580 ARMOR 4 GBMSI RX 580 ARMOR 8 GBMSI RX 580 ARMOR MK2MSI RX 580 ARMOR MK2 OCMSI RX 580 ARMOR OC 4 GBMSI RX 580 ARMOR OC 8 GBMSI RX 580 GAMINGMSI RX 580 GAMING X 4 GBMSI RX 580 GAMING X 8 GBMSI RX 580 MECH 2 OCMSI RX 580 V1ONDA RX 580 Model 4 GBPCYES RX 580PowerColor RX 580 MiningPowerColor Red Devil RX 580 OCPowerColor Red Dragon RX 580 OC 4 GBPowerColor Red Dragon RX 580 OC 8 GBPowerColor Red Dragon RX 580 OC V2Sapphire NITRO+ RX 580 4 GBSapphire NITRO+ RX 580 8 GBSapphire 58 GBSapphire PULSE RX 580 4 GBSapphire PULSE RX 580 8 GBSapphire PULSE RX 580 V2 8 GBVisionTek RX 580 OverclockedXFX GTR RX 580 Black Edition OCXFX GTR RX 580 XXX OCXFX GTS RX 580 Black EditionXFX GTS RX 580 Black EditionXFX GTS RX 580 XXX5 0 XXX 8 GBYeston RX 580 GAMEACE 4 GBYeston RX 580 GAMEACE 8 GB

Desired tuning quality
Select. .Ultra quality — MSAA, HBAO, and advanced shadowsHigh quality — No MSAA, HBAO, or advanced shadowsMedium qualityLow quality

check for errors, performance and serviceability — an overview of diagnostic programs

Do you want to know the status of the card? If yes, then the best option would be to check the video card in special testing programs (stress tests). With their help, we will find errors, find out the current performance and health of the card, and also form a list of further recommendations based on the data received. nineOl000

  • Video Memory Stress Test
  • Unigine Heaven Benchmark
  • Windows tools
  • Data analysis
  • Detailed video tutorial
  • User comments

    • The information that I will share in this section is required reading for anyone who tests their hardware. If you do not familiarize yourself with it, do not apply the recommendations, then your equipment may fail and it is unlikely that it will be possible to bring it back to life.

    So, here are the recommendations that it is desirable to follow:

    1. Update drivers . I’ll tell you how to do it right. First you need to download the latest version of the software from the official website (so as not to catch viruses). Here is a link to NVIDIA’s website, and here’s to AMD’s. Everything is simple there, choose the model of the video adapter, the system and download. After that, you need to remove the old drivers through special programs. Then install new drivers and restart the PC. nine0018
    2. Visually inspect the graphics card for damage . Make sure that there is no physical damage (breakage, swollen capacitors, etc.). Clean the cooling system of the entire computer (if you have a laptop, you will have to completely disassemble it), replace the thermal paste. If you notice that some fans do not work or spin poorly, you can lubricate them with engine oil (service), or even better, change them right away. This is extremely important, since during the test of the video card, the maximum load is created by the testing programs (this means that the temperature increases to the limit), and if there are any problems with cooling, then the risk of finishing off the card increases significantly. nine0018
    3. Notebook users . When conducting a video card test, in no case place the device on surfaces that absorb and store heat. Also make sure the ventilation holes are not blocked or clogged with dust. You can lift the device by placing it on matchboxes (if you don’t have a cooling pad) to allow hot air to escape from under the laptop.
    4. Overclocked . If you want to improve the performance of the card by increasing the speed and FPS, then I recommend getting the MSI Afterburner utility and reading a detailed article on this topic. Next, we will test the overclocked card to make sure that everything is in order with it. nine0018
    5. How to do stress tests correctly . Whatever program you use, I recommend being near the computer, or at least periodically looking at it. It is important to monitor the process and avoid excessive overheating. Luckily, metrics such as temperature, FPS (frames per second), fan speed, memory usage, and everything else are displayed in any normal application. If the video adapter heats up to 90-95 degrees, you need to stop the process and deal with the causes of overheating. nine0018
    6. Simple test options . Non-lovers of third-party software will use the usual methods. The first is to open the video on YouTube as 2k+ and wait half an hour or an hour. The second is to play a demanding game on high or ultra graphics settings. The third is to start rendering the video, for example, through Adobe Premiere. Create any project, upload a video so that the process lasts at least 30 minutes, sit down at a computer or laptop and watch the process. These are the best options for determining the health of a video card, since testing takes place in the mode of performing real tasks. At the same time, it is useful to have «GPU-Z» (Sensors) running for detailed monitoring (viewing frequency, bus, cooler speed, etc.). nine0018

    But sometimes simple options are not suitable, uninformative, complicated or inconvenient, so I will talk about special tools for checking the performance of a video card. I will consider only free ones that I used myself.

    Programs for video card test

    Let’s start reviewing the best applications and talk about how to use them correctly. So let’s go!

    FurMark (fluffy bagel)

    A simple, free and convenient program with which you can check the health of your laptop or computer graphics card. Furmark performs a stress test (creates the maximum load through a graphic donut, as while working in a resource-intensive application or in games). Judging by the system requirements, Furmark functions stably on all versions of the OS, including Windows 10, 8 and 7, so feel free to use it. nine0003

    How to work with it:

    1. First you need to download the utility on your PC, install and run (after closing all running applications and games). After launching, Furmark will automatically detect the model of the graphics adapter, screen resolution modes and temperature.
    2. Choose « Resolution » (resolution) depending on the resolution of your monitor. «Present 1080» is for PC with Full HD (1920×1080 pixels) and «Present 720» for PC with HD (1280×720 pixels). nine0018
    3. Open « GPU-Z » and move to « Sensors » for more detailed monitoring (view frequency, cooler speed, etc.).
    4. Start the donut test by clicking on the » GPU stress test » button or on the appropriate resolution button.
    5. Next, testing will begin, at this time it is better not to use the PC. The recommended test time is 30-60 minutes.
    6. Upon completion, a window with results (characteristics, device parameters and other indicators) will be displayed. nine0018

    You can also compare the received data with the indicators of other users. To do this, in Furmark, click the button » Submit «, after the results are uploaded to the server, then the browser will automatically start with the page of the comparison table.

    OCCT

    Free benchmark with simple interface. Popular among overclockers who like to squeeze the maximum performance out of video cards and processors. The utility will stress test the video card and find errors. It has some settings, for example, you can choose the type of testing, duration, DirectX version and much more. nine0003

    How to use it:

    1. Download the stable version (Stable) and install.
    2. Run the application and open the section « Test» .
    3. We go to the tab with the image of the video card and the inscription « 3D» . Set the following scan parameters.
      • Duration — 30 or 60 minutes. Putting less makes no sense. The longer the testing lasts, the more likely it is to get objective and correct data on the performance and serviceability of the video card. nine0018
      • Error detection — enabled.
      • Shader complexity — 3 (you can set more if you wish).
      • Load limit (load) — unscrew the value to 100%.
    4. Now let’s check the memory of the video card. We move to « VRAM «, select the video adapter, unscrew the memory slider to the maximum and click on the button « Start «.

    When completed, OCCT will display the found problems and video memory errors that affect the performance and health of the video adapter. Also, during a stress test, it is useful to look at the «Monitoring» section to prevent overheating and failure of the card. nine0003

    3DMark Basic Edition

    A popular benchmark that combines many different gaming tests, which increases the reliability of the data obtained. And this is very important, because the further fate of the video adapter depends on it. It will fall for prevention, repair or disposal.

    1. Click « BENCHMARKS «, then « FILTERS «. Choose the appropriate DirectX and resolution.
    2. In the column « Best match » select any test from the list. nine0018
    3. Press « RUN «.
    4. The collection of information about the system and verification will begin, which takes place in several stages:
      • The first stage — preparation begins.
      • The second and third steps are graphics checks (1) and (2).
      • The fourth stage is the PhysX test.
      • Fifth step — evaluates the overall performance of the system.
    5. At the end, a window with results will be displayed. You will see temperature, performance (FPS) and more. nine0018
    6. If desired, you can click on the button » Compare Result Online » (Compare results online). After that, the obtained synthetic results will be uploaded to the network and a page will open in the browser with a comparative table.

    The standard language is English, it is possible to switch to Russian in the settings.

    AIDA64 Extreme

    The program gives detailed information about the installed software, components and has on board the function of conducting stress tests to check the performance of hardware and individual components. Distributed free of charge and in Russian. Let’s use it and test our video card. nine0003

    1. Go to the menu « Service » and click on the item « GPGPU «.
    2. Uncheck the box « CPU » and leave it on « GPU «.
    3. Click on the « Start Benchmark » button.
    4. The benchmark will start. It goes through many stages, memory is checked (reading, writing and copying to video memory) and much more. When finished, the results will appear in the same window.

    The test is quite fast and not very informative. Therefore, additionally use « System stability test «.

    Check all parameters or only on the video processor « GPU «.

    The output will display much more complete information (voltage, fan speed, etc.).

    MSI Kombustor

    Utility from Furmark developers. All the functionality of MSI Kombustor is aimed at testing the video processor « GPU » and the CPU « CPU «. I can single out only one good thing — the artifact scanner, everything else is like everyone else. nine0003

    Brief operating instructions:

    1. Select a synthetic stress test from the list, for example, the default « (GL) msi-01 «.
    2. Specify the resolution and enable « Artifact Scanner «.
    3. Click « RUN stress test «.
    4. We are waiting for 30 — 60 minutes and all this time we are monitoring the process. Found errors will be displayed in the column » Artifacts «.

    NVIDIA MATS/MODS

    This application is used by computer technicians who professionally repair video cards. With the help of NVIDIA MATS/MODS, memory chips are tested in detail for errors and failures. nine0003

    1. To work with it, you will need to create a bootable USB flash drive. Rufus will help with this.
    2. Boot from the flash drive via BIOS and enter the command:

      op-mats

    3. The application will download the patches and get ready to go. Enter the command:

      ./mats -c 100

    4. The video memory scan will start for 1-2 hours (the exact time depends on the amount of memory). We are waiting for the appearance of the inscription » PASS » and enter the following command:

      nano report.txt

    5. The MATS/MODS utility will display results with the number of errors found for specific memory chips. If the video card is working, then the columns will remain empty. Video Memory Stress Test This increases the reliability of the obtained data.

      1. Downloaded as an archive with files that must be unpacked by any archiver to a convenient location. nine0018
      2. Run the application through the file « vmt.exe » (does not require installation), select a graphics device and click « Start «.
      3. We are waiting for the completion of all stages (there are 254 of them). Next, look at the column « Found errors » and « Log «. Errors will be displayed here.

      Unigine Heaven Benchmark

      Powerful and stable tool for evaluating the performance of computer components (video adapter, power supply and cooling). Make sure your components are working properly with our state-of-the-art diagnostic tool « Unigine Heaven Benchmark .

      Instruction:

      1. We accept the agreement « Agree «.
      2. We set the following settings:
        • Language — Russian.
        • Preset (Profile) — Extreme (Extreme).
        • The rest remains as default.
      3. Click « RUN «. Hotkeys will appear in the next window. It is advisable to remember them. Needed to control the procedure.
      4. It is important to monitor the process (we control the indicators in the upper right corner of the window). nine0128
      5. Number of frames per second (FPS).
      6. Graphics — the frequency of the core and shader units (MHz).
      7. Memory — video memory frequency (MHz).