AMD A4-5300 vs Intel Core i3-2120: What is the difference?
40points
AMD A4-5300
32points
Intel Core i3-2120
Comparison winner
vs
64 facts in comparison
AMD A4-5300
Intel Core i3-2120
Why is AMD A4-5300 better than Intel Core i3-2120?
- 533MHz higher ram speed?
1866MHzvs1333MHz - 0.5MB bigger L2 cache?
1MBvs0.5MB - 0.25MB/core more L2 cache per core?
0.5MB/corevs0.25MB/core - 0.9 newer version of DirectX?
11vs10.1 - Has AES?
- 1.2 newer version of OpenGL?
4.2vs3 - 205million more transistors?
1200 millionvs995 million - 0.4GT/s faster bus transfer rate?
5.4GT/svs5GT/s
Why is Intel Core i3-2120 better than AMD A4-5300?
- 2 more CPU threads?
4vs2 - 127MHz faster GPU clock speed?
850MHzvs723MHz - 1.
89x higher PassMark result?
3885vs2051 - 32KB bigger L1 cache?
128KBvs96KB - 31.39% higher PassMark result (single)?
1687vs1284 - Uses multithreading?
- 1.85x higher PassMark result (overclocked)?
4122vs2230 - 36.0 more performance per watt?
95.0vs59.0
Which are the most popular comparisons?
AMD A4-5300
vs
Intel Core i5-3470
Intel Core i3-2120
vs
Intel Celeron N3060
AMD A4-5300
vs
Intel Core i5-4570TE
Intel Core i3-2120
vs
Intel Core i3-2130
AMD A4-5300
vs
Intel Core i5-3330
Intel Core i3-2120
vs
Intel Celeron 1007U
AMD A4-5300
vs
Intel Core i3-3220
Intel Core i3-2120
vs
Intel Celeron G530
AMD A4-5300
vs
Intel Core i5-2400
Intel Core i3-2120
vs
Intel Core i3-3240
AMD A4-5300
vs
AMD A6-5400K
Intel Core i3-2120
vs
Intel Core i5-3470
AMD A4-5300
vs
AMD Athlon II X4 651
Intel Core i3-2120
vs
Intel Core i5-2400
AMD A4-5300
vs
Intel Core i3-4130
Intel Core i3-2120
vs
Intel Core i3-3220
AMD A4-5300
vs
AMD A6-3500
Intel Core i3-2120
vs
Intel Celeron G1620
Price comparison
User reviews
Performance
1.
CPU speed
2 x 3.4GHz
2 x 3.3GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
2.CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
3.turbo clock speed
3.6GHz
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-2120)
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
4.Has an unlocked multiplier
✖AMD A4-5300
✖Intel Core i3-2120
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
5.L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
6.L3 cache
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A4-5300)
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
7.L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
8.L2 core
0.5MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
9.L3 core
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A4-5300)
1.5MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Memory
1.RAM speed
1866MHz
1333MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
2.
maximum memory bandwidth
21GB/s
21GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
4.memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
5.maximum memory amount
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A4-5300)
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
6.bus transfer rate
5.4GT/s
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7.Supports ECC memory
✖AMD A4-5300
✖Intel Core i3-2120
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption.
It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A4-5300)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-2120)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
9.bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A4-5300)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-2120)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Benchmarks
1.PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
2.PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A4-5300)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-2120)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A4-5300)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-2120)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 (single) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A4-5300)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-2120)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single)
Unknown.
Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A4-5300)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-2120)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7.Blender (bmw27) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A4-5300)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-2120)
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
8.Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A4-5300)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-2120)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
9.performance per watt
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✖AMD A4-5300
✔Intel Core i3-2120
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
2.Has AES
✔AMD A4-5300
✖Intel Core i3-2120
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3.Has AVX
✔AMD A4-5300
✔Intel Core i3-2120
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
4.SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔AMD A4-5300
✖Intel Core i3-2120
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
6.bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A4-5300)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-2120)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
7.Has MMX
✔AMD A4-5300
✔Intel Core i3-2120
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖AMD A4-5300
✖Intel Core i3-2120
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
9.front-end width
Unknown.
Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A4-5300)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-2120)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best CPUs?
AMD A4 4000 Dual Core Processor (APU) Review – goldfries
Probably the most under-rated processor this year, the AMD A4 4000 APU is actually a really good processor.
Saw the image above? It’s powered by my PSU that’s more than 5 years old. It’s a 150w PSU from Sunbeam and it powered the rig with 2 drives and a few fans just fine.
Let’s move on to the good bits.
Test Setup
| Processor | AMD A4 4000 |
| RAM | Avexir Core Series 8GB DDR3-1600 / 4GB Kingston Value RAM DDR3 1333. |
| Motherboard | Asrock FM2A85X-ITX |
| Cooler | Stock Cooler |
| Monitor | 40″ LCD TV |
| Power Supply | Cooler Master GX 750W |
| Casing | Cooler Master N200 |
| Drives | 60GB Intel 330 series SSD, 1TB Western Digital Slim HDD |
| Operating System | Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit |
| Driver | AMD Catalyst 13. 4 |
Below are the details of the CPU and IGP
In reference to the AMD processor list ….. I think AMD needs a sledgehammer on the head for not listing this processor there. ? Even the A10-6800K isn’t listed! Ohmai AMD – what have you been doing!??!
No product page link this time.
Benchmark
Starting off with Processor tests…
PC Mark 8
Below are the details of the Creative test used – A4 4000 vs A10 6800K
Then the video test…
x264 – 10bit to 8bit Video Conversion
The source video is a 720p MKV file that is 90 seconds in duration. x264 settings at the slowest.
| AMD A4 4000 | 957 seconds |
| AMD A10 6800K | 407 seconds |
I kid you not. It’s really that far behind.
Now moving on, the GPU test.
Graphics Benchmark
Due to the APU’s graphic processor being on the weaker side, I tested with various resolutions and detail settings to give you a better idea on what the APU can do.
Fortunately this time, the setting of Dual Graphics worked without a hitch.
Unigine Heaven 4.0
*720 Low = no AA, no tessalation, low details.
| Card | 720p LOW(avg) | 720p (avg) |
| A4 4000 | 24.2 | 6.2 |
| A10 6800K | 43.8 | 14.1 |
It’s not that bad actually, have a look at the video below.
The camera recorded video is to show the machine (lower left side) and the FRAPS number. I’m not using FRAPS to record the video because this really isn’t the processor that one should do recording with. ?
The System : AMD A4-4000 on Asrock FM2A85X-ITX (mini-ITX) board with 4GB Kingston Value RAM DDR3 1333.
Running an Intel 60GB 330 Series SSD and a 1TB Western Digital Blue Slim HDD, the system is powered by a 150w (yes, you read that right) PSU from SunbeamTech that’s about half a decade old.
?
Temperature
Here’s the temperature test for the both Richland unit.
| Card | Idle(°C) | Load (°C) |
| A4 4000 | 43 | 71 |
| A10 6800K | 29 | 60 |
I have no explanation for the above. They were tested with the same setup, same environment.
The Verdict
The A4-4000 is priced at around RM 170, pair it with a decent board and it still costs you less than RM 400, slap on 2x 4GB DDR3 1600Mhz RAM and it’s still under RM 600!
The A4-4000 is listed on Newegg.com at $45.99, comes to about RM 150. Pretty good price if that’s the latest price in Malaysia.
Yes, you saw that right. It’s a lovely processor, I have no problem recommending it for really low cost gaming setup. Not every game is graphically demanding. If you’re with 720p resolution with reduced details AND insist on keeping the cost low then I highly recommend using the A4 4000 APU.
goldfries rated this product :
Processor A4-4300M [in 18 benchmarks]
AMD
A4-4300M
- Interface
- Core frequency
- Video memory size
- Memory type
- Memory frequency
- Maximum resolution
Description
AMD started AMD A4-4300M sales 30 June 2012.
This is Trinity architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 2 cores and 2 threads and is manufactured using 32nm process technology, the maximum frequency is 3000MHz, the multiplier is locked.
In terms of compatibility, this is a socket processor
AMD Socket FS1r2
with TDP 35W. It supports memory
unknown
.
It provides poor benchmark performance at
0.97%
from the leader, which is AMD EPYC 7h22.
A4
4300M
vs
EPYC
7h22
General information
Information about the type (desktop or laptop) and architecture of the A4-4300M, as well as when sales started and cost at that time.
| place in performance rating | 2409 | ||
| for laptops | |||
| Series | AMD A-Series | ||
| CODTOM ARCHITETURE | TRINITY (2012-2013) | ||
| Price now | 61 $ | of 16317 (Epyc 7351) |
Quantitative parameters of A4-4300M: number of cores and threads, clock speeds, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock status.
They indirectly speak about the performance of the processor, but for an accurate assessment, you need to consider the results of the tests.
05
| Expanded instructions | 86x SSE (1, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, FMA | |
| AES | 9004 9 + | |
| FMA | + | |
| AVX | ||
| AMD-V | + |
RAM support
Types, maximum size and number of channels of RAM supported by A4-4300M.
Higher memory frequency may be supported depending on the motherboard.
| Memory types | unknown | out of 5200 (Ryzen 5 7600X) |
Integrated video — specifications
General parameters of the integrated video card in A4-4300M.
| GPU | AMD Radeon HD 7420G |
Benchmarks
These are the results of the A4-4300M performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest processor at the moment.
Overall performance in tests
This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
A4-4300M
0.97
- Passmark
- GeekBench 5 Single-Core
- GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
- Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
- Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
- 3DMark06 CPU
- Cinebench 11.
5 64-bit multi-core - Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
- Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
- Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
- TrueCrypt AES
- x264 encoding pass 2
- x264 encoding pass 1
- WinRAR 4.0
- Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core
- Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core
- Geekbench 2
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widely used benchmark that consists of 8 different tests, including integer and floating point calculations, extended instruction tests, compression, encryption, and game physics calculations. Also includes a separate single-threaded test.
Benchmark coverage: 69%
A4-4300M
980
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance. This version uses only one processor core.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
A4-4300M
324
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance. This version uses all available processor cores.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
A4-4300M
490
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is a very outdated ray tracing benchmark for processors developed by the authors of Cinema 4D — Maxon. The Single-Core version uses a single CPU thread to render a futuristic motorcycle model.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
A4-4300M
1997
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 that uses all processor threads. The possible number of threads in this version is limited to 16.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
A4-4300M
3144
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is an outdated set of benchmarks based on DirectX 9 by Futuremark. Its processor part contains two tests, one of which calculates the pathfinding of game AI, the other emulates game physics using the PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
A4-4300M
1684
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 that uses all processor threads. This version supports a maximum of 64 threads.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
A4-4300M
1
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core (sometimes referred to as Multi-Thread) is a variant of Cinebench R15 that uses all of the processor threads.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
A4-4300M
93
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (Release 15) is a benchmark created by Maxon, the creator of the popular Cinema 4D 3D modeling package.
It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench using more modern variants of the Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes referred to as Single-Thread) uses only one CPU thread to render a room full of mirror balls and complexly shaped lights.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
A4-4300M
60
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark developed by Maxon. authors of Cinema 4D. It has been superseded by later versions of Cinebench which use more modern variants of the Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads one CPU thread with ray tracing, rendering a glossy room full of crystal spheres and lights.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
A4-4300M
0.7
TrueCrypt AES
TrueCrypt is a deprecated program that was widely used to encrypt disk partitions on the fly. It contains several built-in benchmarks, one of which is TrueCrypt AES. It measures the speed of data encryption using the AES algorithm.
The result of the test is the encryption speed in gigabytes per second.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
A4-4300M
1
x264 encoding pass 2
x264 Pass 2 is a slower MPEG4 x264 video compression benchmark that results in a variable bit rate output file. This results in a better quality of the resulting video file, as a higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. The benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
A4-4300M
7
x264 encoding pass 1
The x264 benchmark uses the MPEG 4 x264 compression method to encode the sample video in HD (720p). Pass 1 is a faster option that produces an output file at a constant bit rate. Its result is measured in frames per second, that is, how many frames of the source video file were encoded in one second on average.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
A4-4300M
36
WinRAR 4.
0
WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of the popular archiver. It contains an internal speed test using maximum compression by the RAR algorithm on large amounts of randomly generated data. Results are measured in kilobytes per second.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
A4-4300M
1072
Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core
Benchmark coverage: 6%
A4-4300M
2115
Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core
Benchmark coverage: 6%
A4-4300M
1512
Geekbench 2
Benchmark coverage: 5%
A4-4300M
3184
Relative performance
Overall performance of the A4-4300M compared to its closest competitor in notebook processors.
Intel Pentium B950
101.03
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800
100
Intel Core i3-2340UE
100
AMD A4-4300M
100
Intel Core i7-620UM
98.
97
AMD A6-9220e
98.97
Intel Celeron 1037U
98.97
Competitor from Intel
We believe that the nearest equivalent to A4-4300M from Intel is Core 2 Duo T7800, which is approximately equal in speed and lower by 2 positions in our rating.
Core 2
Duo T7800
Compare
Here are some of Intel’s closest competitors to the A4-4300M:
Intel Pentium B950
101.03
Intel Core i3-2340UE
100
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800
100
AMD A4-4300M
100
Intel Core i7-620UM
98.97
Intel Celeron 1037U
98.97
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800
97.
94
Other processors
Here we recommend several processors that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one.
Core i3
2340UE
Compare
Celeron
1037U
Compare
Core i7
620UM
Compare
Pentium
B950
Compare
Celeron
2981U
Compare
Core i3
330M
Compare
Recommended graphics cards
According to our statistics, these graphics cards are most often used with A4-4300M:
Radeon HD
7420G
50.
6%
Radeon HD
7670M
11.9%
Radeon HD
7650M
4.5%
Radeon HD
8750M
3.9%
Radeon HD
7600G
2.3%
Radeon
Graphics
1.6%
Radeon HD
7480D
1%
HD
Graphics 4000
1%
Radeon HD
7640G
0.8%
Radeon HD
7520G
0.8%
User rating
Here you can see the evaluation of the processor by users, as well as put your own rating.
Tips and comments
Here you can ask a question about the A4-4300M processor, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
Review and testing AMD APU A4-3300 GECID.com. Page 1
::>Processors
>2012
> AMD APU A4-3300
26-03-2012
Page 1
Page 2
One page
0003 A8-3850 , AMD A6-3650 , A4-3400 ), which are able to provide system performance in a fairly wide range. Of course, they are not aimed at setting any record performance indicators, however, as practice shows, they provide the owner with a fairly powerful integrated graphics core, which in turn “opens up new horizons” for displaying media content, in comparison with integrated graphics adapters from Intel.
Today we will get acquainted with the junior representative of the AMD APU line. Naturally, AMD APU A4-3300 , like any other junior representative of any product line, is positioned as a budget solution aimed at providing a minimum level of performance. We will try to evaluate the possibilities and decide for what kind of tasks it is best suited.
Appearance and packaging
The graphic design of the boxed version of the junior representative of AMD APU A4-3300 hybrid CPUs is absolutely identical to the models considered earlier. The same bright and catchy.
Standard packaging is characterized by minimal dimensions, which is typical for the entire series. A traditional transparent window, through which you can easily get acquainted with the processor and its markings, is located on the left side wall. The main features are prudently emphasized by the manufacturer: increased energy efficiency, support for the DirectX 11 instruction set by the integrated video core.
AMD APU A4-3300 belongs to the AMD VISION A4 class. The APUs of this series do an excellent job of playing HD video, and are also designed to «help keep in touch with relatives and friends», while providing system multitasking.
On the top side there is a familiar sticker with the key characteristics of the hybrid processor in question: model ( A4 3300 ), clock frequency ( 2.5 GHz ), cache size ( 1 MB ), processor socket ( FM1 ), serial number, and product code. Support for AMD Dual Graphics Technology At the same time, it only supports operation in combination with AMD Radeon HD 6450 video cards. Naturally, no one says that the owner will not be able to supply a more productive solution at some point, however, guaranteed compatibility in this mode is present only with AMD Radeon HD 6450.
The usual configuration of the boxed version of the APU is typical for both a high-performance solution and a budget one.
It is represented by a cooling system, instructions for installing the processor, which also contains information about warranty obligations, and a branded sticker for a PC case indicating the model range.
The complete cooling system is marked 1A02M5M00. Judging by the information on the Web, this solution is the brainchild of AMD. It has traditionally been used with processors that have fairly low TDPs, such as the AMD Athlon II X4 615e. A cursory glance is enough to understand that this is a budget version of the cooler, which will provide the temperature regime required for a hybrid processor operating at standard settings, but no more. The design is standard for solutions of this class supplied in boxed versions of AMD CPUs — it consists of an aluminum heatsink and a fan. The background noise during operation is not too great, however, if the system unit is placed close to the user, over time, it may be necessary to replace it with a more efficient and quiet cooling system.
The heat spreader cover of the processor contains brief information about the “product”: processor model, marking (AD3300OJZ22GX) and place of production (Malaysia). You can decipher the marking as follows:
-
A — the processor belongs to the AMD Athlon family;
-
D — the scope of this processor — workstations;
-
3300 — model number;
-
OJ — thermal package of the processor 65 W;
-
Z — the processor is packaged in a 905 pin Socket FM1 package;
-
2 — total number of active cores;
-
2 — 512 KB L2 cache per core and no L3 cache;
-
GX is the core of the LN-B0 stepping processor.
The back of the APU has 905 pins and is compatible exclusively with Socket FM1. Please note that motherboards with this processor socket will cost a little more and this, ultimately, does not affect the cost of the system in the best way.
Specification
|
Model |
AMD APU A4-3300 |
|
Marking |
AD3300OJZ22GX |
|
Processor socket |
Socket FM1 |
|
Clock frequency, GHz |
2.5 |
|
Multiplier |
25 |
|
Bus frequency, MHz |
100 |
|
L1 cache size (Data / Instructions), KB |
2×64 / 2×64 |
|
L2 cache size, KB |
2×512 |
|
L3 cache size, KB |
— |
|
Core |
Llano |
|
Number of cores / threads |
2 / 2 |
|
Instruction support |
MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, x86-64 |
|
Supply voltage, V |
— |
|
Power dissipation, W |
65 |
|
Critical temperature, °C |
71. |
|
Process |
32 nm |
|
Technology support |
Dual Graphics |
|
Built-in memory controller |
|
|
Maximum memory, GB |
64 |
|
Memory types |
DDR3 (up to 1600 MHz) |
|
Number of memory channels |
2 |
|
Maximum throughput, GB/s |
29.8 |
|
ECC support |
No |
|
Radeon HD 6410D 9 integrated graphics0005 |
|
|
Stream Processors |
160 |
|
SIMD |
2 |
|
Texture Blocks |
8 |
|
ROP blocks |
4 |
|
GPU clock frequency, MHz |
443 |
|
Instruction support |
DirectX 11 (Tessellation, ShaderModel 5. |
|
Video decode acceleration |
Video Decoder Generation 3 (UVD3) |
Reading the specification of this solution, it becomes clear that the AMD APU A4-3300 differs from the AMD APU A4-3400 solely in the reduced frequencies of both the processor unit (by 200 MHz) and the graphics component (by 157 MHz). The lack of support for Turbo Core technology further emphasizes the budget model.
According to the readings of the CPU-Z utility, we have a processor made using a 32-nm process technology based on the Llano architecture, which, of course, emphasizes the manufacturability of the product. The clock frequency of the hybrid processor is 2500 MHz, while the core voltage was 1.008 V, which in itself looks quite attractive in terms of energy efficiency. The maximum TDP of the AMD APU A4-3300 model is determined by the manufacturer at 65 W.
Cache memory is distributed similarly to the previously discussed AMD APU A4-3400 model. 64 KB L1 cache with 2-line associativity per core, split equally between data and instruction caching; L2 cache — 512 KB per core with 16-line associativity.
The DDR3 memory controller operates in dual channel mode and can support up to DDR3-1600 RAM.
We have already encountered the Radeon HD 6410D graphics core during our acquaintance with the AMD APU A4-3400. There are no fundamental differences in terms of the number of computing units, however, for the younger model of the line, the core frequency was slowed down and is 443 MHz, unlike the older version. You can find out the most complete information about the performance and capabilities of the graphics cores of hybrid processors in comparison with discrete video cards, as well as evaluate their work in AMD Dual Graphics mode, in material «AMD Radeon HD 6410D, Radeon HD 6530D, and Radeon HD 6550D Integrated Graphics Testing» .
Radeon HD 6410D graphics core performance
To determine the performance ratio of the graphics cores of the APUs we have already studied in comparison with the «top» integrated graphics solution from Intel, a series of tests was performed.
9000 9000 9000 9000