Amd x3 720 black edition: Amd Phenom II X3 720 Black Ed

AMD Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition PCSTATS Review

Abstract: Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition processor is one of the first Phenom
II processors, and it’s got a secret that has PCSTATS very excited.
 78% Rating:   

Table of Contents

Filed under: CPU / Processors Published:  Author: 
External Mfg. Website:
AMD
Feb 28 2009   J. Apong  

Home >
Reviews >
CPU / Processors >
AMD Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition

AMD’s latest Phenom II CPUs are built on a 45nm
manufacturing process. It will be interesting to see if this, and
re-architecting of the Phenom II’s microprocessor reduce power draw
significantly compared to Intel’s Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Quad CPUs.

As always, before any power measurements are taken the CPU power saving and
clock speed throttling technologies like Cool ‘n’ Quiet, EIST (speedstep) and
C1E power states are disabled. PCSTATS then set about stressing each core of the
processor one by one, until all cores were loaded.

For this we used Stress
Prime (SP2004). The total system
power consumption, measured in Watts, is monitored with an Extech Power Analyzer
Datalogger (model 380803). The power meter is located between the main 120AC
supply and the PC’s power supply so it measures the entire computer system, the
difference between CPU loaded and unloaded states is the key value to pay
attention to.

Total System Idle
Power Draw
Processor Total System Power Draw
Intel Pentium 4 540 150 Watts
Intel Pentium D 840 165 Watts
Intel Pentium D 940 168 Watts
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 117 Watts
Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 123 Watts
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 131 Watts
Intel Core i7 920 144
Watts
AMD Sempron 3600+ 120 Watts
AMD Athlon64 4000+ 163 Watts
AMD Athlon64 FX-60 127 Watts
AMD Athlon64 X2 4800+ 143 Watts
AMD Athlon64 X2 5000+ 156 Watts
AMD Athlon64 FX-62 168 Watts
AMD Athlon II X2 250 128
Watts
AMD Phenom II X2 550 BE

145
Watts

AMD Phenom II X3 720* 155
Watts
AMD Phenom II X3 720** 128
Watts

* DDR2 based system, ** DDR3 based PC system.

Running three Phenom II cores in DDR2 memory mode draws a bit more power than PCSTATS likes to see,
but fortunately a switch to a socket AM3 motherboard and DDR3 memory mode reduced
power draw signficantly in idle mode, bringing the AMD Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition in line with the
Core 2 Duo E8400 processor.

Total System
Stressed Power Draw — All Cores/Threads
Processor Total System Power Draw (All Cores)
Intel Pentium 4 540 223 Watts
Intel Pentium D 840 (2 Core ) 240 Watts
Intel Pentium D 940 (2 Core Load) 253 Watts
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 (2 Core Load) 156 Watts
Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 (2 Core Load) 163 Watts
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 (2 Core Load) 158 Watts
Intel Core i7 920 (8 Thread Load) 213
Watts
AMD Sempron 3600+ 148 Watts
AMD Athlon64 4000+ 172 Watts
AMD Athlon64 FX-60 (2 Core Load) 196 Watts
AMD Athlon64 X2 4800+ (2 Core Load) 173 Watts
AMD Athlon64 X2 5000+ (2 Core Load) 207 Watts
AMD Athlon64 FX-62 (2 Core Load) 235 Watts
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2 Core Load) 163
Watts
AMD Phenom II X2 550 (2 Core Load) 181
Watts
AMD Phenom II X3 720* (1 Core) 182
Watts
AMD Phenom II X3 720** (1
Core)
157
Watts
AMD Phenom II X3 720* (2 Core) 196
Watts
AMD Phenom II X3 720** (2
Core)
176
Watts
AMD Phenom II X3 720* (3 Core) 213
Watts
AMD Phenom II X3 720** (3
Core)
190
Watts

* DDR2 based system, ** DDR3 based PC system.

When stressed the power consumption of the Phenom II AMD
Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition was 190W in DDR3 mode
, and broke the 200W barrier when using higher-wattage DDR2 memory. It seems
like AMD doesn’t have a lot of headroom with this generation of processors, we
may not see Phenom II processors clocked higher than 3.4-3.6GHz or
so.

< Previous Page

© 2022 PCSTATS.com

Next Page >

 

Contents of Article: AMD Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition


 Pg 1.  

AMD Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition 45nm Socket AM3 Processor Review
 Pg 2. 

Enter the Dragon (Platform)
 Pg 3. 

Socket AM3 and compatibility
 Pg 4. 
— System Power Draw Tests
 Pg 5. 

45nm Overclocking Potential?
 Pg 6. 

Test System Specs / Benchmarks: Sysmark, PCMark Vantage
 Pg 7. 

32-Bit CPU Synthetic Benchmarks: Sandra 2009 Processor / Memory
 Pg 8. 

32-Bit CPU Calculation Benchmarks: Super Pi, wPrime2.0
 Pg 9. 

32-Bit CPU Calculation Benchmarks: ScienceMark2, WinRAR
 Pg 10. 

32-Bit CPU Rendering Benchmarks: Cinebench R10, Bibble 5
 Pg 11. 

32-Bit CPU Rendering Benchmarks: POV-Ray, 3.7, SPECviewPerf 10
 Pg 12. 

32-Bit CPU Synthetic Gaming Benchmarks: 3DMark Vantage, 3DMark 06
 Pg 13. 

32-Bit CPU Gaming Benchmarks: Crysis, FEAR
 Pg 14. 

Conclusions: World’s First Triple-Core CPU

AMD Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition 45nm Socket AM3 Processor Review

Abstract: Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition processor is one of the first Phenom
II processors, and it’s got a secret that has PCSTATS very excited.
 78% Rating:   

Table of Contents

Filed under: CPU / Processors Published:  Author: 
External Mfg. Website:
AMD
Feb 28 2009   J. Apong  

Home >
Reviews >
CPU / Processors >
AMD Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition

AMD’s Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition processor is one of the first Phenom
II processors, and it’s got a secret that
has PCSTATS very excited. Designed for AMD’s socket AM3 form factor, the AMD Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition is a
2.8GHz processor equipped with 6MB of L3 cache and dual DDR2/DDR3 memory support. However
the real shocker is that the AMD Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition isn’t a dual-core processor. Or a quad-core
processor. It’s actually the world’s first triple-core
desktop processor.

To understand the significance of a triple-core processor, it’s a good idea
to take a quick step back and look at the state of multi-core desktop
processing. When the first dual-core desktop processors launched
in late 2005, they increased system performance across the
board . With two cores to process data in parallel, it was possible to run
Windows and its background services on one core, while the second core ran an
intensive application (say, Crysis). Running two cores in parallel
improved overall processor efficiency, eliminating the wasted processor cycles
induced by swapping between applications.

Shortly after dual-core processors made their debut, quad-core designs were
introduced by both Intel and AMD. While in certain applications like video
encoding or 3D rendering having four cores could theoretically quadruple
performance, most of the time the system simply wasn’t doing
enough to utilize all four cores efficiently. Surely there had to be a
number between two and four that would solve this problem!

AMD believes that number is… three. The new AMD Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition is a
triple-core processor, and it strikes a balance between dual and quad-core
processors in more ways than one. At 2.8GHz it’s the fastest of AMD’s new
line-up of Phenom II processors, reaching the same clocks as some of their
dual-core offerings. However it has the same large 6MB of L3 cache as the
high-end quad-core Phenom II X4 810 processor, which means it gets 2MB of cache
per core.

AMD Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition Processor
Tech
Specs

Phenom II X3 720 Black
Edition

Clock: 2.8 GHz
Cores: 3
L1:128KB
L2:512KB
L3:6MB

Multipiler: 14x
Package:
938-pin
Socket: AM3 (AM2+)
organic mPGA
Core:
45nm SOI
Power: 95W
Vcore:1.25-1.35V
Cost: $130 USD

However three cores and big caches isn’t the only trick that the AMD Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition has in
store. The Phenom II is a socket AM3 product, and if you’ve been following along
that means that not only will it fit into AMD’s new socket AM3 motherboards, it
will also be backwards compatible with socket AM2+ and certain socket AM2
motherboards. This cross-compatiblity comes thanks to a dual memory
controller that supports both DDR2 and DDR3 memory. This make the AMD Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition a very
versatile processor, and PCSTATS will be testing out it new memory modes
and performance in both socket AM2+ and socket AM3 motherboards.

To top everything off, the Phenom II X3 720 is a Black Edition
processor. The overclockers in the crowd already know that this means it
has an unlocked multiplier, so the AMD Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition’s speed can be increased without
adjusting the FSB. Unlocked processors are often capable of extreme
overclocks, so you can bet that PCSTATS will be cranking up the megahertz of the
AMD Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition a little later on in this review.

The AMD Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition is based largely on the design of the Phenom II X4 920, and the two
processors share a 758 million transistor count and a 258mm2 die size.
Both processor are also produced on a 45nm node, which makes them more power
efficient and reduces excess heat. Since the AMD Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition has one fewer core than
the Phenom II X4 920, its TDP has dropped to a reasonable 95W.

Although its suggested price is only $145 CDN ($130 USD £90 GBP), AMD suggests that the AMD Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition’s most
direct competition comes from the $200 Intel Core 2 Duo E8400, a favorite
amongst high-performance/low-cost system builders. PCSTATS has both
processors loaded onto the test bench, so we’ll see if the AMD
AMD Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition’s triple-cores, dual-memory controllers and unlocked multiplier
will make it a match for Intel’s Wolfdale processors. It’s
a head-to-head battle that only one processor can win!

First though, it’s time to take a look at AMD’s new plans for the
desktop. ..

© 2022 PCSTATS.com

Next Page >

 

Contents of Article: AMD Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition


 Pg 1. 
— AMD Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition 45nm Socket AM3 Processor Review
 Pg 2. 

Enter the Dragon (Platform)
 Pg 3. 

Socket AM3 and compatibility
 Pg 4. 

System Power Draw Tests
 Pg 5. 

45nm Overclocking Potential?
 Pg 6. 

Test System Specs / Benchmarks: Sysmark, PCMark Vantage
 Pg 7.  

32-Bit CPU Synthetic Benchmarks: Sandra 2009 Processor / Memory
 Pg 8. 

32-Bit CPU Calculation Benchmarks: Super Pi, wPrime2.0
 Pg 9. 

32-Bit CPU Calculation Benchmarks: ScienceMark2, WinRAR
 Pg 10. 

32-Bit CPU Rendering Benchmarks: Cinebench R10, Bibble 5
 Pg 11. 

32-Bit CPU Rendering Benchmarks: POV-Ray, 3.7, SPECviewPerf 10
 Pg 12. 

32-Bit CPU Synthetic Gaming Benchmarks: 3DMark Vantage, 3DMark 06
 Pg 13. 

32-Bit CPU Gaming Benchmarks: Crysis, FEAR
 Pg 14. 

Conclusions: World’s First Triple-Core CPU

Review AMD Phenom II X3 720



  • Introduction
  • Test configuration
  • Instrumentation and test procedure
  • Test results: performance comparison
    • Arcania — Gothic 4 (Fishir)
    • ARMA 2 (Benchmark #1)
    • Battlefield Bad Company 2 (Multiplier Power)
    • Borderlands (Badlands)
    • Colin McRae DIRT 2 (Battle of Battersea — London)
    • Crysis (Village)
    • Dragon Age Origins (Ostagar)
    • Far Cry 2 (First ride)
    • Formula 1 2010 (Benchmark)
    • Grand Theft Auto 4 EFLC (Lost and Damned)
    • Kane & Lynch 2 — Dog Days (Air Strike)
    • Lost Planet Colonies (Zone 1)
    • Mafia 2 (Benchmark)
    • Mass Effect 2 (Tali’s Judgment)
    • Need for Speed ​​SHIFT
    • Prototype (Then and Now)
    • R. U.S.E. (Benchmark)
    • Splinter Cell — Conviction (Lincoln Memorial)
    • StarCraft 2: Wings of Liberty (Into Darkness)
    • World in Conflict: Soviet Assault (Coast)
  • Pins
  • Applications. General performance comparison of
  • processors

    • Phenom II X3 720 vs. Core 2 Quad Q8300
    • Phenom II X3 720 vs Core 2 Duo E8400
    • Phenom II X3 720 vs Core 2 Duo E7600
    • Phenom II X3 720 vs Athlon II X4 640
    • Phenom II X3 720 vs Athlon II X3 440


    The latest reviews, where processors were tested, were devoted to AMD products — Athlon II X4 640, Athlon II X3 440, Athlon II X2 220. This material begins a cycle that examines the older models of the company of the same name, namely Phenom II.

    It will be opened by the Phenom II X3 720 processor, which has an undeniable advantage over the younger Athlon II brothers in the form of 6 MB L3 cache. Let’s see what dividends this technological advantage will bring to our hero in the confrontation with rivals: Athlon II X4 640, Athlon II X3 440, Core 2 Quad Q8300, Core 2 Duo E8400 and Core 2 Duo E7600.

    recommendations

    Starting with this review, I introduce a serious distinction between test packages for processors and video cards. An analysis of the work done earlier revealed a big minus of the unified toolkit: «non-processor-dependent» games greatly blurred the final result, distorting the final picture. Therefore, in the future, when testing processors, games that load them most heavily will be selected. And accordingly, another package will be selected for video cards, with increased requirements for the graphic component of the computer.



    Stand #1:

    • Motherboard: GigaByte GA-EX38-DS4, BIOS F6c
    • RAM: 2 x 2048MB DDR2 Hynix (Spec: 800MHz / 5-5-5-15-2t / 1. 9V)

    Stand #2:

    • Motherboard: GigaByte GA-890FXA-UD7, BIOS F4
    • RAM: 2 x 2048MB DDR3 Corsair (Spec: 1600MHz / 8-8-8-20-1t / 1.65V)

    Processors:

    • Core 2 Quad Q8300 — 2500 @ 3400 MHz
    • Core 2 Duo E8400 — 3000 @ 4200 MHz
    • Core 2 Duo E7600 — 3060 @ 4000 MHz
    • Phenom II X3 720 — 2800 @ 3700 MHz
    • Athlon II X4 640 — 3000 @ 3600 MHz
    • Athlon II X3 440 — 3000 @ 3700 MHz

    Other components:

    • Video card: GeForce GTX 480 1536 MB — 700/1400/3696 MHz (Palit)
    • CPU cooling system: Cooler Master V8 (~1100 rpm)
    • Drive subsystem: SATA-II 500 GB, WD 5000KS, 7200 rpm, 16 MB
    • PSU: Corsair TX 950 Watt (stock fan: 140mm blown)
    • Housing: open test stand
    • Monitor: 23″ Acer V233H (Wide LCD, 1920×1080 / 60Hz)

    Software:

    • Operating system: Windows 7 build 7600 RTM x64
    • Graphics drivers: GeForce 260. 89 WHQL


    For a more visual comparison of processors, all games used as test applications were launched at 1280×1024 and 1920×1080 resolutions.

    The following games used benchmarks:

    • ARMA 2 (Benchmark #1)
    • Colin McRae DIRT 2 (Battle of Battersea — London)
    • Crysis (Village)
    • Formula 1 2010 (Benchmark)
    • Grand Theft Auto 4 EFLC (Lost and Damned)
    • Lost Planet Colonies (Zone 1)
    • Mafia 2 (Benchmark)
    • R.U.S.E. (Benchmark)
    • World in Conflict: Soviet Assault (Coast)

    Performance in these games was measured using FRAPS v3.2.1 build 11425 and AutoHotkey v1.0.48.05:

    • Arcania — Gothic 4 (Fishir)
    • Battlefield Bad Company 2 (Multiplier Power)
    • Borderlands (Badlands)
    • Dragon Age Origins (Ostagar)
    • Far Cry 2 (First ride)
    • Kane & Lynch 2 — Dog Days (Air Strike)
    • Mass Effect 2 (Tali’s Judgment)
    • Need for Speed ​​SHIFT
    • Prototype (Then and Now)
    • Splinter Cell — Conviction (Lincoln Memorial)
    • StarCraft 2: Wings of Liberty (Into Darkness)

    minimum and average FPS values ​​were measured in all games.

    In tests where it was not possible to measure the minimum FPS , this value was measured by the FRAPS utility.

    VSync was disabled during testing.

    To avoid errors and minimize measurement errors, all tests were performed three to five times. When calculating the average FPS, the final result was taken as the arithmetic mean of the results of all runs (three not «idle»). As the minimum FPS, the minimum value of the indicator based on the results of three runs was chosen.


    Intel Processor Specifications



    AMD Processor Specifications


    Processors were overclocked as follows. The stability of overclocking was checked by the OSST 3.1.0 «Perestroika» utility by running the processor for half an hour on the maximum matrix with a forced 100% load. We agree that the overclocking we have identified is not absolutely stable, but it is one hundred percent suitable for any modern game.

    Core 2 Quad Q8300

    Regular mode. Clock frequency 2500 MHz, system bus frequency 333 MHz (333×7.5), DDR2 frequency — 1066 MHz (333×3.2), core supply voltage 1.29 V, DDR2 supply voltage — 2.1 V.

    The processor was overclocked to a modest 3400 MHz. To do this, the system bus frequency was raised to 453 MHz (453×7.5), the core supply voltage — up to 1.45 V, the DDR2 supply voltage — 2.1 V, the system bus supply voltage — by 0.2 V, the north bridge voltage — by 0.1 V. DDR2 frequency was 1087 MHz (453×2.4).

    Core 2 Duo E8400

    Regular mode. Clock frequency 3000 MHz, system bus frequency 333 MHz (333×9), DDR2 frequency — 1066 MHz (333×3.2), core supply voltage 1.275 V, DDR2 supply voltage — 2.1 V.

    3400 MHz — system bus frequency 378 MHz (378×9), DDR2 frequency — 1006 MHz (378×2.66), core supply voltage 1.275 V, DDR2 supply voltage — 2.1 V.

    The processor was overclocked to 4200 MHz. For this, the system bus frequency was raised to 467 MHz (467×9), the core supply voltage — up to 1. 45 V, the DDR2 supply voltage — 2.1 V, the system bus supply voltage — by 0.2 V, the north bridge voltage — by 0.1 V. The DDR2 frequency was 1121 MHz (467×2.4).

    Core 2 Duo E7600

    Regular mode. Clock frequency 3060 MHz, system bus frequency 266 MHz (266×11.5), DDR2 frequency — 1066 MHz (266×4), core supply voltage 1.275 V, DDR2 supply voltage — 2.1 V.

    3400 MHz — system bus frequency 296 MHz (296×11.5), DDR2 frequency — 987 MHz (296×3.33), core supply voltage 1.275 V, DDR2 supply voltage — 2.1 V.

    The processor was overclocked to 4000 MHz. To do this, the system bus frequency was raised to 348 MHz (348×11.5), the core supply voltage — up to 1.45 V, the DDR2 supply voltage — 2.1 V, the system bus supply voltage — by 0.2 V, the north bridge voltage — by 0.1 V. DDR2 frequency was 1044 MHz (348×3).

    Phenom II X3 720

    Regular mode. Clock frequency 2800 MHz, system bus frequency 200 MHz (200×14), memory controller frequency 2000 MHz (200×10), DDR3 frequency — 1333 MHz (200×6. 66), core supply voltage 1.31 V, DDR3 supply voltage — 1.65 V.

    3400 MHz — bus frequency 242 MHz (242×14), memory controller frequency 2420 MHz (242×10), DDR3 frequency — 1612 MHz (242×6.66), core supply voltage 1.38 V, DDR3 supply voltage — 1.65 V.

    The processor was overclocked to 3700 MHz. To do this, the bus frequency was raised to 265 MHz (265×14), the memory controller to 2650 MHz (265×10), the core supply voltage to 1.52 V, the DDR3 supply voltage to 1.65 V, the north bridge voltage to 0.1 V. The DDR3 frequency was 1766 MHz (265×6.66).

    Athlon II X4 640

    Regular mode. Clock frequency 3000 MHz, system bus frequency 200 MHz (200×15), memory controller frequency 2000 MHz (200×10), DDR3 frequency — 1333 MHz (200×6.66), core supply voltage 1.3 V, DDR3 supply voltage — 1.65 V.

    3400 MHz — bus frequency 227 MHz (227×15), memory controller frequency 2270 MHz (227×10), DDR3 frequency — 1512 MHz (227×6.66), core supply voltage 1. 375 V, DDR3 supply voltage — 1.65 V.

    The processor was overclocked to 3600 MHz. To do this, the bus frequency was raised to 240 MHz (240×15), the memory controller to 2400 MHz (240×10), the core supply voltage to 1.48 V, the DDR3 supply voltage to 1.65 V, the north bridge voltage to 0.1 V. The DDR3 frequency was 1600 MHz (240×6.66).

    Athlon II X3 440

    Regular mode. Clock frequency 3000 MHz, system bus frequency 200 MHz (200×15), memory controller frequency 2000 MHz (200×10), DDR3 frequency — 1333 MHz (200×6.66), core supply voltage 1.4 V, DDR3 supply voltage — 1.65 V.

    3400 MHz — bus frequency 227 MHz (227×15), memory controller frequency 2270 MHz (227×10), DDR3 frequency — 1512 MHz (227×6.66), core supply voltage 1.43 V, DDR3 supply voltage — 1.65 V.

    The processor was overclocked to 3700 MHz. To do this, the bus frequency was raised to 247 MHz (247×15), the memory controller to 2470 MHz (247×10), the core supply voltage to 1. 48 V, the DDR3 supply voltage to 1.65 V, the north bridge voltage to 0.1 V. The DDR3 frequency was 1645 MHz (247×6.66).

    Let’s go directly to the tests.






    • Version 1.1
    • DirectX9
      • texture quality — high
      • SSAO quality — high
      • light quality — high
      • shadow quality — ultra
      • dynamic shadows — world and geometry
      • shadows — world and geometry
      • the quality of the characters is high
      • world quality — high
      • particle quality — high
      • exposure — incl.
      • glare — incl.
      • face detail — incl.
      • post-processing — incl.


    1280 x 1024

    Please enable JavaScript to see graphs

    1920 x 1080

    Please enable JavaScript to see graphs



    minimum and average FPS

    Despite the rather «heavy» graphics, the game Arcania — Gothic 4 unexpectedly turned out to be «hungry» for the number of processor cores. Thus, all three- and four-core processors easily overtook such a well-deserved veteran as the Core 2 Duo E8400.

    The game makes serious demands on the power of processors, in the normal mode and at a resolution of 1280×1024 all CPUs could not provide comfortable performance, except that the Athlon II X4 640 was close to it.

    It is also worth noting that the influence of processors is also observed at 1920×1080 — the results of the rivals, of course, smoothed out, but the trends remained similar to 1280×1024.

    The

    Phenom II X3 720 made a favorable impression. At nominal frequencies, it was able to confidently compete for second place with Athlon II X4 640 and Core 2 Quad Q8300, and after overclocking, it took this position, slightly ahead of its rivals.





    • Version 1.05.62017
    • DirectX9
      • full screen anti-aliasing (AA) 4
      • anisotropic filtering (AF) 16
      • viewing distance — maximum
      • texture quality — very high
      • shadow size — 4096
      • landscape quality — very high
      • the quality of the objects is very high
      • shadow quality — very high
      • post-processing — very high


    1280 x 1024

    Please enable JavaScript to see graphs

    1920 x 1080

    Please enable JavaScript to see graphs



    minimum and average FPS

    The game ARMA 2 became a serious test for all test participants — not a single (even overclocked) processor reached the level of comfortable performance. The influence of processors on the results turned out to be so great that they practically did not change when switching from a resolution of 1280×1024 to 1920×1080.

    Phenom II X3 720 once again showed its best side, being able to compete on equal terms with Athlon II X4 640 for the first positions in average FPS. and Core 2 Quad Q8300.